Behavior Analysis in Practice最新文献

Abstract

Quality assurance in behavior planning may best be accomplished when quality measures match governing policies that closely parallel best practice standards. This article provides an example of state government creating practice guidelines for focused behavioral services delivered in a home and community-based waiver system. We provide an overview of existing quality assurance instruments for behavior plans and share a unique quality review tool with several automated features designed to assess adherence to these practice guidelines. Considerations are offered for others with interest in policy to practice alignment, along with suggestions on how behavior analysts can successfully participate in policy making and quality assurance.

The purpose of this article was to review and summarize the literature investigating the impact of differential reinforcement on skill acquisition. Researchers synthesized data from 10 articles across the following categories: (1) participant characteristics; (2) setting; (3) reinforcement procedures; (4) within-subject replication; (5) results; and (6) secondary measures (e.g., social validity). Results indicated that most of the participants were male, had a diagnosis of autism, and communicated vocally. The differential reinforcement condition in which reinforcement favored independent responses (e.g., edible for independent; praise for prompted responses) was the most frequently employed differential reinforcement condition and it resulted in the acquisition of more responses or faster acquisition for most participants. In addition, when differing reinforcement procedures manipulating different parameters of reinforcements were compared, better outcomes were attained when the schedule of the reinforcer was manipulated within the differential reinforcement procedure relative to when quality or magnitude were manipulated. Limitations of the previous research, recommendations for future research, and implications for clinical practice are discussed.

ABA research abounds with articles on increasing or decreasing a small set of behaviors. These articles fit nicely within the framework of Focused ABA Treatment in which the goal of treatment centers on only a few behaviors. However, many behavioral practitioners spend most of their time developing Comprehensive ABA Treatment in which a large number of behaviors are systematically changed across multiple developmental domains. Few resources are available to help in designing and implementing such programming. This article presents a model from the field of instructional design for the development of comprehensive programming. Applying the ADDIE model—Analyze, Design, Develop, Implement, Evaluate—the article identifies a consistent process to follow, critical actions to take, and helpful resources to use when developing comprehensive programming for individuals with autism.

Reinforcers frequently chosen may not offer the same nutritional value as fruits and vegetables. Prior researchers have explored preferences and the effectiveness of salty and sweet foods compared to fruits and vegetables, but the criteria for demonstrating effectiveness have often been arbitrary rather than academic. In addition, it remains unclear how the integration of these potentially nutritious reinforcers might affect learning or hinder learning efficiency. Therefore, the objective of this study was to investigate whether introducing fruits or vegetables as potential reinforcers could sustain responding achieved with salty or sweet reinforcers. The implications of this model for incorporating a variety of reinforcers while maintaining responding are also discussed.

Developing and improving organizational processes is an important element for staff satisfaction, effective communication, and ultimately the success of an organization (Rummler & Brache, 2013). Human-service organizations are no exception and, in fact, could greatly benefit from process improvement. This article provides guided steps for using process maps as a means for improving processes in human-service organizations.

Students with emotional/behavioral disorders (EBD) commonly engage in both externalizing and internalizing behaviors—a behavioral profile that has been connected to childhood trauma. Although the efficacy of function-based interventions for students with EBD has been documented, the extent to which these interventions align with principles of trauma-informed care (TIC) is unknown. We conducted a systematic review of function-based intervention studies for students with EBD to evaluate whether and how these interventions incorporated critical elements of TIC. We identified 56 articles that met the eligibility criteria and used an iterative process to identify intervention practices consistent with each of six pillars of TIC, then evaluated the extent to which interventions in the study sample incorporated these practices. Despite identifying 45 function-based intervention practices aligned with pillars of TIC, we found most of these practices were absent in most interventions. We identified teaching skills, building healthy relationships, and including family, culture, and community as three pillars of TIC that warrant more attention when developing function-based interventions for students with EBD. For pillars of TIC that lack a strong empirical foundation in behavior analysis, we point to related literatures and disciplines with potential to inform next steps in behavior analytic research and practice.

Criticisms of applied behavior analysis (ABA) from the autistic community continue to intensify and have an appreciable impact on research, practice, and conversation in stakeholder groups. ABA providers aspire to increase quality of life for autistic people; thus, it is imperative for providers to listen with humility and openness to the population we serve. Autistic individuals have unparalleled expertise in their own lives and their own communities. The concerns raised by the autistic community cannot, morally or ethically, be swept aside. There may be a misguided and harmful tendency to devalue concerns due to the speaker’s identification as autistic or due to their difference in professional credentials. The concept of neurodiversity can help the ABA field respond to these concerns and collaborate with the largest stakeholders of our services, the autistic clients we serve. This article summarizes some of the key criticisms that autistic advocates raise concerning ABA, discusses the social model of disability and the neurodiversity paradigm, and proposes practical guidance to help the field of ABA integrate neurodiversity and thereby evolve our research and practice. By openly acknowledging the criticisms against ABA and recognizing how we can do better as a field, we believe we can take practical steps towards a profession and a society that more fully embraces inclusion.

This article addresses the relationship between applied behavior analysis (ABA) and the emergence of positive behavior support (PBS) in context of autism spectrum disorder (ASD) in the UK and Ireland. Two overarching issues that are salient in this discussion are professional training and certification. To date, there has been a lack of standardized training or statutory requirements to practice PBS despite proponents insisting that its practice should be grounded in behavior analytic principles. Furthermore, there is an undercurrent of anti-ABA bias fueled by misinterpretation and unsubstantiated anecdotal claims used to promote an alternative “value based” approach to managing behavior.