Psychotherapie Psychosomatik Medizinische Psychologie最新文献

Up to now, there is little bundled knowledge about how psychotherapists deal with their own aging. The aim of the present study was a systematic review of the existing literature on the topic of psychotherapists' aging. In a systematic literature search, which was primarily conducted via electronic databases, 55 relevant hits (empirical studies, literature-based texts, books and book contributions, and free text forms) were identified, whose relevant contents were systematically compiled. The literature search revealed a lack of empirical research on the question of how psychotherapists deal with their own aging. Within the systematic review, key findings were presented in areas of 1. age-related issues and challenges among older psychotherapists, 2. resources and sources of experience among older psychotherapists, and 3. engagement with aging and exit from psychotherapy practice. The systematic review illustrates the comprehensiveness of the topics that are relevant in the context of psychotherapists' aging. Dealing with aging also includes the discussion of one's own retirement, whereby the literature suggests a high propensity to work among older psychotherapists, who highly value their status and their individual professional freedoms in old age. It was shown that one's own aging is associated with diverse effects on professional identity and psychotherapeutic work. Future empirical research should address age-related changes in the context of psychotherapeutic work and inquire about attitudes of psychotherapists towards age-related issues. Interests and plans of (older) psychotherapists should be heard and their resources should be used.

Cancer-related fatigue (CRF) is a burdensome condition of persistent tiredness, weakness, and lack of energy on physical, emotional, and cognitive level. CRF occurs in the context of cancer and/or its therapy and correlates with limitations in everyday life functioning, quality of life, and survival time. Up to now, medical care in Germany is inadequate. German wide institutions are lacking, which are specialised in identifying treatable factors influencing CRF as well as in counselling of adequate, evidence-based treatments. Since 2013, the Bavarian Cancer Society (BCS) implemented a nationwide health care structure with ten psychosocial cancer counselling centers in Bavaria. At these locations, the BCS offers for cancer patients with CRF special consultation hours with well-founded diagnostic and guidance. During the conception and further development of the consultation hour, all relevant guidelines have been considered. All consultation hours are directed by physicians with oncological and psycho-oncological experience. All of them took part in an extensive CRF training. The aim of this prospective, multicentre, observational study is the evaluation of the actual state of the TF-consultation including the analyses of offer and need for TF-consultation hours, of patient-reported TF before TF-consultation and ten weeks later, of realization of the recommended interventions to reduce TF as well as the analysis of strengths and potentials for improvement of the current system. The results will help to implement a German wide care structure.

Being diagnosed with cancer is commonly associated with psychological distress. Especially patients with advanced disease report a range of distinct symptoms that are referred to as existential distress. The conceptualization of existential distress is mainly characterized by the loss of a sense of meaning and purpose in life resulting from the confrontation with a life-threatening disease. Existential distress has a significant impact on health care outcomes and quality of life. It has been found to be associated with suicidal ideation, even in the absence of mental disorders such as depression. Meaning-centered psychotherapy offers effective interventions with regard to reducing existential distress in cancer patients.

Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate the extent to which the therapeutic relationship changed as a result of the COVID-19-related switch from face-to-face to video therapy.

Method: Twenty-one psychotherapists, who had changed the setting of therapy from face-to-face to video therapy were interviewed. The interviews were then transcribed, coded and superordinate themes were created in the context of a qualitative analysis.

Results: More than half of the therapists reported that the therapeutic relationship with their patients remained stable. In addition, the majority of therapists described uncertainties in dealing with and responding to non-verbal signals, as well as maintaining an appropriate distance to their patients. Overall, both an improvement and a deterioration of the therapeutic relationship was reported.

Discussion: The stability of the therapeutic relationship was mainly attributed to the therapists' previous face-to-face contact with their patients. The uncertainties expressed could be interpreted as risk factors for the therapeutic relationship. Although the sample represented only a small portion of working therapists, the findings from this study represent an important milestone in understanding how psychotherapy has changed as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Conclusion: The therapeutic relationship remained stable despite the change from face-to-face to video therapy.

Objective: Sleep disturbances are one of the most prevalent health complaints in the general population. Thus, the need for validated screening instruments and prevention measures is high. The aim of the current study is to evaluate a potential single-item screening instrument and therefore, contribute to an improved early detection.

Methods: Data from Saxony Longitudinal Study (SLS) is being analyzed. Based on data of 32nd wave (n=321, 172 women, 149 men, M age=48.42, SD=0.64), the G-Score Item #3 ("Have you had the following complaints in the last 12 months? Please indicate how often they occurred. - sleeplessness"), a potential screening instrument, is psychometrically evaluated. A Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC)-Analysis is calculated to assess the predictive validity of the G-Score Item #3.

Results: Retestreliability for the G-Score Item #3 is 0.70 (p<0.001). Correlation with the Jenkins Sleep Scale (JSS) was r=0.79 (p<0.01). The area under the curve (AUC) is 0.92, providing evidence for a very good predictive validity.

Discussion and conclusion: This study provides evidence for the use of the G-Score Item #3 as a screening instrument for sleep disturbances by showing good psychometric properties and brevity.