Radiography最新文献

Purpose

Artificial intelligence (AI) in positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) can be used to improve image quality when it is useful to reduce the injected activity or the acquisition time. Particular attention must be paid to ensure that users adopt this technological innovation when outcomes can be improved by its use. The aim of this study was to identify the aspects that need to be analysed and discussed to implement an AI denoising PET/CT algorithm in clinical practice, based on the representations of Nuclear Medicine Technologists (NMT) from Western-Switzerland, highlighting the barriers and facilitators associated.

Methods

Two focus groups were organised in June and September 2023, involving ten voluntary participants recruited from all types of medical imaging departments, forming a diverse sample of NMT. The interview guide followed the first stage of the revised model of Ottawa of Research Use. A content analysis was performed following the three-stage approach described by Wanlin. Ethics cleared the study.

Results

Clinical practice, workload, knowledge and resources were de 4 themes identified as necessary to be thought before implementing an AI denoising PET/CT algorithm by ten NMT participants (aged 31–60), not familiar with this AI tool. The main barriers to implement this algorithm included workflow challenges, resistance from professionals and lack of education; while the main facilitators were explanations and the availability of support to ask questions such as a “local champion”.

Conclusion

To implement a denoising algorithm in PET/CT, several aspects of clinical practice need to be thought to reduce the barriers to its implementation such as the procedures, the workload and the available resources. Participants emphasised also the importance of clear explanations, education, and support for successful implementation.

Implications for practice

To facilitate the implementation of AI tools in clinical practice, it is important to identify the barriers and propose strategies that can mitigate it.

Introduction

Elastic stable intramedullary nailing (ESIN) is a well-defined and appropriate treatment of choice for long bone fractures. Despite its benefits, the risk of cancer from imaging devices is of particular concern for younger adults. So, this survey was conducted to estimate the doses administered to patients undergoing ESIN of long bone fractures utilizing a 2-dimensional (2D) C-arm fluoroscopy machine during surgery, as well as the carcinogenic risk associated with the use of the machine.

Methods

This study was conducted on 147 patients who required ESIN for long-bone fractures. Patients' demographic data, surgical data and imaging information were collected. For each patient, the organ doses and the effective doses were computed with the Monte Carlo PCXMC 2.0 simulation software. The cancer risk models proposed in the Biological Effects of Ionizing Radiation VII (BEIR VII) Phase 2 report were used to evaluate the risk of exposure-induced cancer death (REID) values.

Results

For all patients, the highest organ dose was delivered to the gonads. The mean effective dose was 0.026 ± 0.015 mSv and 1.3E-04 ± 1E-04 mSv for ESIN of femur and tibia fractures, respectively. Males had a mean REID of 1 per million, while females had a mean REID of 0.19 per million. The younger males had considerably higher REID values. The effective dose was significantly correlated with age, gender, and irradiation time.

Conclusion

Low levels of effective doses and cancer risks associated with the utilization of the fluoroscopy machine in current practice were found in ESIN treatment of long-bone fractures.

Implications for practice

This outcome will help to raise surgeons' awareness of radiation risks and encourage them to initiate measures to keep radiation dose and exposure time as low as reasonably achievable.

Introduction

This paper presents motivational factors to engage, start a research project and pursue a research career. The study aimed to investigate radiographer's motivation for engaging in research.

Methods

Eight radiographers from Denmark with experience in research were interviewed in a 2-h focus group interview in October 2023. This qualitative approach was selected to allow the participants to discuss their opinions and values. The discussions were audio recorded and transcribed before the thematic analysis was performed.

Results

The analysis revealed six main themes: the importance of radiographic research, the importance of radiographers' participation in research, research radiographers’ motivation, funding and participation in research projects, demotivation and difficulties, and facilitating radiographic research in the future.

Conclusion

The participants were motivated by different factors. The participants found both research in radiography and radiographers’ participation in research-related activities important, although they found lack of support from managers, funding, and time to be demotivational factors.

Implication for practice

This study contributes to the limited literature on motivational factors for becoming a researcher within radiography.

Introduction

Evidence based practice relies on availability of research evidence mostly through peer-reviewed journal publications. No consensus currently exists on the best hierarchy of research evidence, often categorised by the adopted research designs. Analysing the prevalent research designs in radiography professional journals is one vital step in considering an evidence hierarchy specific to the radiography profession and this forms the aim of this study.

Methods

Bibliometric data of publications in three Radiography professional journals within a 10-year period were extracted. The Digital Object Identifier were used to locate papers on publishers' websites and obtain relevant data for analysis. Descriptive analysis using frequencies and percentages were used to represent data while Chi-square was used to analyse relationship between categorical variables.

Results

1830 articles met the pre-set inclusion criteria. Quantitative descriptive studies were the most published design (26.6%) followed by non-RCT experimental studies (18.7%), while Randomised Controlled Trials (RCT) were the least published (1.0%). Systematic reviews (42.9%) showed the highest average percentage increase within the 10-year period, however RCTs showed no net increase. Single-centre studies predominated among experimental studies (RCT = 88.9%; Non-RCT = 95%). Author collaboration across all study designs was notable, with RCTs showing the most (100%). Quantitative and qualitative studies comparatively had similar number of citations when publication numbers were matched. Quantitative descriptive studies had the highest cumulative citations while RCTs had the least.

Conclusion

There is a case to advocate for more study designs towards the peak of evidence hierarchies such as systematic reviews and RCT. Radiography research should be primarily designed to answer pertinent questions and improve the validity of the profession's evidence base.

Implication for practice

The evidence presented can encourage the adoption of the research designs that enhances radiography profession's evidence base.

Introduction

Evidence suggests the bladder trigone to be a potential organ at risk (OAR) in predicting acute and late genitourinary (GU) side effects when treating prostate cancer with radiotherapy.

Methods

A search of MEDLINE, Cinahl, EMBASE, PubMed, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and OpenGrey was conducted and no current or underway systematic reviews or scoping reviews on the topic were identified. A systematic literature review was carried out assessing the quality of this evidence. All evidence that prospectively or retrospectively reviewed radiotherapy or modelled radiotherapy dose to the bladder trigone were included. The search was conducted on the 8th July 2021 with 32 studies included in this review. This was repeated 10th June 2023 and two additional studies were identified. Any evidence published since this date have not been included and are a limitation of this review.

Results

MRI imaging is recommended to assist in delineating the trigone which has been shown to have a high amount of inter-observer variability and the use of specific training may reduce this. Across all radiotherapy treatment modalities, trigone dose contributed to GU acute and late toxicity symptoms. Trigone motion is relative to prostate motion but further research is required to confirm if the prostate can be used as a reliable surrogate for trigone position. The dose tolerance given for specific trigone related toxicities is debated within the literature, and on analysis the authors of this review suggest bladder trigone dose limits: Dmean < 45.8 Gy, V61.0Gy < 40%, V59.8Gy < 25%, V42.5Gy-V41.0Gy < 91% and V47.4Gy-V43.2Gy < 91% with α/β of 3 Gy to reduce acute and late GU toxicities.

Conclusion

There is evidence to support further research into bladder trigone sparing radiotherapy to improve patient outcomes.

Implication for practice

Using the bladder trigone as an organ at risk is possible and the authors are currently seeking funding for a feasibility trial to further investigate this.

Introduction

Delivering 24 h healthcare requires rotational shift work from doctors and the medical imaging team, while contributing to safe and timely care of patients. Additional service pressure and staff shortfall leads to workload pressures, adjusted shift patterns and risk of burnout. Evidence should be sought to the effects of this work on staff.

Methods

This systematic review followed PRISMA reporting guidelines, using a convergent mixed methods approach according to Guidance from Joanna Briggs International. Quantitative trends and results were qualified in order to thematically analyse in conjunction with qualitative data and discussed together in context.

Following initial searching, returned articles were screened by title and abstract. A team of 3 reviewers undertook blinded critical appraisal of those suitable, with quality assurance from a 4th team member. Papers passing a threshold of 75% on JBI appraisal tools were accepted for synthesis. Data extraction of appropriate articles retrieved was undertaken in parallel.

Results

Following screening and critical appraisal, 13 studies were returned focusing exclusively on Non Consultant Doctors. No studies investigated diagnostic radiographers. 85% (n = 11) reported negative association between shift work and the three themes of sleep/fatigue, burnout and wellbeing: including after the introduction of shift pattern control or adjusted shift patterns. The remainder showed no change, or any improvement nullified by countermeasures to maintain service delivery.

Conclusion

Current working practices and shift plans in the target population showed detrimental effects on the participants – this can be suggested that Diagnostic Radiographers may suffer fatigue, burnout and poor mental health from stretched shift working patterns.

Implications for Practice: Further study into the effects of shift work on Diagnostic Radiographers and other allied health professionals is indicated - relating to the above themes in the context of errors and patient safety. Additional research into Non Consultant Doctors, shift work effects and the context of wider service delivery required; with suitable interventions and education to maximise understanding of legal working practices, monitoring and self-management of symptoms.

Introduction

Optimal radiographic image quality is critical because it affects the accuracy of the reporter's interpretation. Radiographers have an ethical obligation to obtain quality diagnostic images while protecting patients from unnecessary radiation, including minimizing rejected and repeated images. Repeated imaging due to positioning errors have increased in recent years.

Methods

This study evaluated the effectiveness of non-immersive virtual reality (VR) simulation on first-year students' evaluation of positioning errors on resultant knee and lumbar spine images. Crossover intervention design was used to deliver radiographic image evaluation instruction through traditional lecture and guided simulation using non-immersive VR to 33 first-year radiography students at a single academic institution located across four geographic program locations. Pre- and post-test knowledge assessments examined participants’ ability to recognize positioning errors on multiple-choice and essay questions.

Results

Raw mean scores increased on multiple choice questions across the entire cohort for the knee (M = 0.82, SD = 3.38) and lumbar spine (M = 2.91, SD = 3.69) but there was no significant difference in performance by instructional method (p = 0.60). Essay questions reported very minimal to no raw mean score increases for the knee (M = 0.27, SD = 2.78) and lumbar spine (M = 0.00, SD = 2.55), with no significant difference in performance by instructional method (p = 0.72).

Conclusion

Guided simulation instruction was shown to be as effective as traditional lecture. Results also suggest that novice learners better recognize image evaluation errors and corrections from a list of options but have not yet achieved the level of competence needed to independently evaluate radiographic images for diagnostic criteria.

Implications for practice

Non-immersive VR simulation is an effective tool for image evaluation instruction. VR increases access to authentic image evaluation practice by providing a simulated resultant image based off the students’ applied positioning skills.

Introduction

Work-related back pain has a major impact on diagnostic radiographers’ clinical task performance in terms of sickness absenteeism, disability and loss of productivity due to presenteeism. However, there is limited information about the burden of work-related back pain among diagnostic radiographers in Ghana. The aim was to explore diagnostic radiographers’ experiences of work-related back pain in Ghana.

Methods

An exploratory-descriptive qualitative study using semi-structured telephone interviews was conducted. Purposive and snowball sampling techniques were used to recruit participants. The interviews were facilitated by an interview guide. Thematic network approach was used to analyse the data.

Results

Eighteen participants, with 14 males and 4 females were interviewed. The mean age of the participants was 31.7 ± 7.3 years. Three themes were developed: increasing burden of work-related back pain; making sense of the multifaceted risk factors for work-related back pain; and preventing work-related back pain. Low back pain was the most common, followed by neck pain with thoracic pain as the least common reported work-related back pain by participants. Identified risk factors included: physical factors; environmental ergonomic factors; and psychosocial factors. Prevention strategies identified were categorised into: health and safety training; creating lifting team; leadership support from diagnostic imaging managers; participatory ergonomics; workforce planning and scheduling; mindfulness exercises; and physical rehabilitation.

Conclusion

Assessing the level of ergonomic risks is critical to identifying, analysing and controlling workplace risk factors that can lead to work-related back pain among diagnostic radiographers. Future research is recommended to design and evaluate a multicomponent ergonomic intervention for the prevention of work-related back pain among diagnostic radiographers to enable them deliver care safely and healthily.

Implications for practice

Understanding diagnostic radiographers experiences of work-related back pain can help develop effective strategies to reduce the growing burden of pain back.

Introduction

The primary aim of statutory regulation in healthcare is patient safety. Few studies examine health professionals’ perceptions of statutory regulation and its impact on patient safety. Statutory regulation of sonographers is different in Australia and New Zealand which affords a unique opportunity to compare and contrast regulation and its impact.

Methods

An interpretive policy analysis investigated how statutory regulation in the sonography profession addresses patient safety in Australia and New Zealand. A framework analysis explored relevant statutory regulatory policy as well as interviews from sonographers.

Results

Four policy documents were included. Thirty-one sonographers in Australia and nine in New Zealand took part in semi-structured interviews. Four themes described statutory regulation and its impact on patient safety: how statutory regulation is implemented in practice to address patient safety; factors contributing to implementation of statutory regulation; impact of statutory regulation on sonographers; and considerations for regulation.

Conclusion

Statutory regulation provides a reference point for safe practice but can be non-specific in defining sonographers’ roles and outlining strategies that address patient safety.

Sonographers' perspectives of how regulation of practice addresses patient safety was mixed. A gap exists in sonographers’ understanding of the role of statutory regulation in patient safety.

Implications for practice

Regulatory authorities must consider how to effectively engage and educate both patients and practitioners about their role in patient safety.

Practitioners should also take the opportunity to engage in understanding the role of statutory regulation in enhancing patient safety.

A broader view of how Fitness-to-Practice in sonography is managed should be considered in light of the findings.