Luisa Kcomt, Kevin M Gorey, Betty Jo Barrett, Dana S Levin, Jill Grant, Sean Esteban McCabe
This study examines past-year unmet healthcare need due to cost experienced by transgender and gender-expansive (TGE) adults in the United States in the context of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA). It also aims to estimate the importance of having health insurance among TGE Americans (transgender men, transgender women, nonbinary/genderqueer people, and cross-dressers). Data were from the 2015 U.S. Transgender Survey (N = 19,157 adults, aged 25 to 64 years). Multivariable logistic regression models were used to determine the adjusted odds ratios (AOR) and 95 percent confidence intervals (CI) of TGE individuals' past-year unmet healthcare need due to cost. Although the majority (86.8 percent) reported seeing a doctor or healthcare provider in the past year, 32.1 percent reported past-year unmet healthcare need due to cost. One in six respondents (17.1 percent) was uninsured and almost one-third (29.8 percent) were at/near poverty. The prevalence of unmet healthcare need was greater among the uninsured (65.1 percent) than among the insured (25.2 percent). Compared with transgender women, nonbinary/genderqueer people (AOR = 1.31, 95% CI [1.18, 1.46]) and transgender men (AOR = 1.30, 95% CI [1.18, 1.42]) had greater odds of unmet healthcare need due to cost. Social workers can lobby to fully enact the ACA by underscoring affordability and availability as important dimensions of healthcare access for TGE populations.
{"title":"Unmet Healthcare Need Due to Cost Concerns among U.S. Transgender and Gender-Expansive Adults: Results from a National Survey.","authors":"Luisa Kcomt, Kevin M Gorey, Betty Jo Barrett, Dana S Levin, Jill Grant, Sean Esteban McCabe","doi":"10.1093/hsw/hlab029","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/hsw/hlab029","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study examines past-year unmet healthcare need due to cost experienced by transgender and gender-expansive (TGE) adults in the United States in the context of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA). It also aims to estimate the importance of having health insurance among TGE Americans (transgender men, transgender women, nonbinary/genderqueer people, and cross-dressers). Data were from the 2015 U.S. Transgender Survey (N = 19,157 adults, aged 25 to 64 years). Multivariable logistic regression models were used to determine the adjusted odds ratios (AOR) and 95 percent confidence intervals (CI) of TGE individuals' past-year unmet healthcare need due to cost. Although the majority (86.8 percent) reported seeing a doctor or healthcare provider in the past year, 32.1 percent reported past-year unmet healthcare need due to cost. One in six respondents (17.1 percent) was uninsured and almost one-third (29.8 percent) were at/near poverty. The prevalence of unmet healthcare need was greater among the uninsured (65.1 percent) than among the insured (25.2 percent). Compared with transgender women, nonbinary/genderqueer people (AOR = 1.31, 95% CI [1.18, 1.46]) and transgender men (AOR = 1.30, 95% CI [1.18, 1.42]) had greater odds of unmet healthcare need due to cost. Social workers can lobby to fully enact the ACA by underscoring affordability and availability as important dimensions of healthcare access for TGE populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":47424,"journal":{"name":"Health & Social Work","volume":"46 4","pages":"250-259"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2021-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39493159","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Vera Steiner, Lynette Joubert, Aron Shlonsky, Anita Morris
Patients with incurable end-stage cancer (IESC) who are parenting minor-age children often experience parenting-related distress. Parenting concerns are not always addressed as part of routine hospital-based psychosocial care. Currently, there is a lack multidisciplinary health professional (HP) perspectives in this area. An exploratory study of hospital-based HP perspectives of adult patients' and coparents' parenting experiences, support needs, and parenting supportive care practice was conducted. Twelve multidisciplinary HPs from one Australian tertiary hospital participated in a semistructured focus group and interviews. Data were audio recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using thematic analysis. Results showed HPs were cognizant of patients' and coparents' diverse parenting support needs and experiences and other aspects that comprise best practice. However, multilevel organization, HP, and patient/coparent barriers impeded optimal practice. Barriers included a nonsystemized approach to screening patients' parenting status and parenting support needs, inadequate resources, limited professional support, hospital environment, and parent psychosocial factors. This article provides feasible options for addressing practice barriers. Reviewing what factors influence optimal parenting focus from interdisciplinary HP perspectives helped identify potential strategies that could influence a shift from medical-focused care to more holistic family-focused patient care.
{"title":"Hospital Parenting Support for Adults with Incurable End-Stage Cancer: Multidisciplinary Health Professional Perspectives.","authors":"Vera Steiner, Lynette Joubert, Aron Shlonsky, Anita Morris","doi":"10.1093/hsw/hlab024","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/hsw/hlab024","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Patients with incurable end-stage cancer (IESC) who are parenting minor-age children often experience parenting-related distress. Parenting concerns are not always addressed as part of routine hospital-based psychosocial care. Currently, there is a lack multidisciplinary health professional (HP) perspectives in this area. An exploratory study of hospital-based HP perspectives of adult patients' and coparents' parenting experiences, support needs, and parenting supportive care practice was conducted. Twelve multidisciplinary HPs from one Australian tertiary hospital participated in a semistructured focus group and interviews. Data were audio recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using thematic analysis. Results showed HPs were cognizant of patients' and coparents' diverse parenting support needs and experiences and other aspects that comprise best practice. However, multilevel organization, HP, and patient/coparent barriers impeded optimal practice. Barriers included a nonsystemized approach to screening patients' parenting status and parenting support needs, inadequate resources, limited professional support, hospital environment, and parent psychosocial factors. This article provides feasible options for addressing practice barriers. Reviewing what factors influence optimal parenting focus from interdisciplinary HP perspectives helped identify potential strategies that could influence a shift from medical-focused care to more holistic family-focused patient care.</p>","PeriodicalId":47424,"journal":{"name":"Health & Social Work","volume":"46 4","pages":"289-298"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2021-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39517262","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Catherine Wilsnack, Jennifer L Young, Shana L Merrill, Victoria Groner, Jennifer T Loud, Renee C Bremer, Mark H Greene, Payal P Khincha, Allison Werner-Lin
Li-Fraumeni syndrome (LFS) is a rare hereditary cancer syndrome in which individuals have a significantly increased risk of developing multiple cancers throughout the life span. An LFS diagnosis may shift the individual's sense of self and tolerance of cancer risk as they engage in cancer screening and cancer prevention activities. This study examined the impact of family identity on health decision making, communication, and role function. Forty-five families completed one or more interviews during an annual, protocol-specific cancer screening study. An interdisciplinary team analyzed 66 interviews using interpretive description and modified grounding theory. Thematically, identity emerged as an evolving construct regarding self and/or family, embedded in historical and ongoing experiences with LFS. Notions of individual and shared family identities guided decision making related to healthcare and influenced interpersonal communication and role function between supportive networks and families. Alignment between individual, family, and generational identities may shape engagement in genetic testing, risk management, and family life. Medical teams that are unequipped to address the psychosocial challenges that LFS populations face may include mental health professionals on interprofessional care teams to navigate risk management and consequential familial conflict.
{"title":"Family Identity and Roles in the Context of Li-Fraumeni Syndrome: \"No One's Like Us Mutants\".","authors":"Catherine Wilsnack, Jennifer L Young, Shana L Merrill, Victoria Groner, Jennifer T Loud, Renee C Bremer, Mark H Greene, Payal P Khincha, Allison Werner-Lin","doi":"10.1093/hsw/hlab032","DOIUrl":"10.1093/hsw/hlab032","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Li-Fraumeni syndrome (LFS) is a rare hereditary cancer syndrome in which individuals have a significantly increased risk of developing multiple cancers throughout the life span. An LFS diagnosis may shift the individual's sense of self and tolerance of cancer risk as they engage in cancer screening and cancer prevention activities. This study examined the impact of family identity on health decision making, communication, and role function. Forty-five families completed one or more interviews during an annual, protocol-specific cancer screening study. An interdisciplinary team analyzed 66 interviews using interpretive description and modified grounding theory. Thematically, identity emerged as an evolving construct regarding self and/or family, embedded in historical and ongoing experiences with LFS. Notions of individual and shared family identities guided decision making related to healthcare and influenced interpersonal communication and role function between supportive networks and families. Alignment between individual, family, and generational identities may shape engagement in genetic testing, risk management, and family life. Medical teams that are unequipped to address the psychosocial challenges that LFS populations face may include mental health professionals on interprofessional care teams to navigate risk management and consequential familial conflict.</p>","PeriodicalId":47424,"journal":{"name":"Health & Social Work","volume":"46 4","pages":"299-307"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2021-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8783604/pdf/hlab032.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39493023","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Values Not Our Own: Interrogating Psychosocial Suitability in the Transplant Social Work Assessment.","authors":"Sinthu Srikanthan","doi":"10.1093/hsw/hlab028","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/hsw/hlab028","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":47424,"journal":{"name":"Health & Social Work","volume":"46 4","pages":"308-311"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2021-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39479280","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
N ot surprisingly, a great deal of literature continues to emerge that addresses the effects of COVID-19 on various populations of interest to social work policy and practice. A substantial number of such articles have been and will be published in Health & Social Work and other journals central to the discipline. This growing body of literature addresses a wide range of presenting concerns across varied settings with attention to particular disparities faced by vulnerable populations. While the focus of social work practice centers around the needs of those we serve, it is essential to consider how COVID-19 has affected—and may enduringly affect—us, both as individuals and professionals. The challenges faced by social workers during the pandemic are far-reaching and unique to each of us. As a profession, social work has been confronted with an increase in mental, behavioral, and physical health concerns among those with whom we work; overwhelming job demands that carry the expectation of maintaining productivity while adapting to physical distancing protocols; rising social inequities; a worldwide atmosphere suffused in complex grief; anxieties about personal safety and that of our loved ones; expanding responsibilities in caring for children and other family members; and the innumerable ethical dilemmas that come with this intricate combination of obligations (McClain, 2020). It is certainly no wonder that social worker wellness, work–life balance, and selfcare feel monumentally difficult to consider, no less to achieve. The pressure to do so can in itself be experienced as just another unreachable expectation or chore rather than a benefit. The familiar airline instructions “Please place the mask over your own mouth and nose before assisting others” come to mind. Yet, these routine safety precautions fall short as we should not wait for the unexpected, emergency situations or global pandemics to employ self-care strategies. The importance of wellness has long been a consistent part of our training and continual professional development that is supported by the National Association of Social Workers (NASW, 2021) Code of Ethics as professional responsibility to ensure ethical practice (Downing et al., 2021). COVID-19 brought the necessity of self-care practices to the forefront and tested our ability to use them, often while working and living in the same space. The standard recipe—taking time for oneself, maintaining social connections, seeking support, setting boundaries, self-reflecting, taking measures to prevent burnout—can be difficult to attain or maintain in the best circumstances. While facing the additional stressors introduced by a global pandemic, these recommendations can feel insufficient and be easily brushed aside in the moment. Complicating matters, various physical distancing, quarantine, and isolation procedures forced us to reimagine how these strategies can be implemented safely while maintaining their effectiveness. For exa
{"title":"Self-Care Insights from COVID-19.","authors":"Christine M Rine","doi":"10.1093/hsw/hlab030","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/hsw/hlab030","url":null,"abstract":"N ot surprisingly, a great deal of literature continues to emerge that addresses the effects of COVID-19 on various populations of interest to social work policy and practice. A substantial number of such articles have been and will be published in Health & Social Work and other journals central to the discipline. This growing body of literature addresses a wide range of presenting concerns across varied settings with attention to particular disparities faced by vulnerable populations. While the focus of social work practice centers around the needs of those we serve, it is essential to consider how COVID-19 has affected—and may enduringly affect—us, both as individuals and professionals. The challenges faced by social workers during the pandemic are far-reaching and unique to each of us. As a profession, social work has been confronted with an increase in mental, behavioral, and physical health concerns among those with whom we work; overwhelming job demands that carry the expectation of maintaining productivity while adapting to physical distancing protocols; rising social inequities; a worldwide atmosphere suffused in complex grief; anxieties about personal safety and that of our loved ones; expanding responsibilities in caring for children and other family members; and the innumerable ethical dilemmas that come with this intricate combination of obligations (McClain, 2020). It is certainly no wonder that social worker wellness, work–life balance, and selfcare feel monumentally difficult to consider, no less to achieve. The pressure to do so can in itself be experienced as just another unreachable expectation or chore rather than a benefit. The familiar airline instructions “Please place the mask over your own mouth and nose before assisting others” come to mind. Yet, these routine safety precautions fall short as we should not wait for the unexpected, emergency situations or global pandemics to employ self-care strategies. The importance of wellness has long been a consistent part of our training and continual professional development that is supported by the National Association of Social Workers (NASW, 2021) Code of Ethics as professional responsibility to ensure ethical practice (Downing et al., 2021). COVID-19 brought the necessity of self-care practices to the forefront and tested our ability to use them, often while working and living in the same space. The standard recipe—taking time for oneself, maintaining social connections, seeking support, setting boundaries, self-reflecting, taking measures to prevent burnout—can be difficult to attain or maintain in the best circumstances. While facing the additional stressors introduced by a global pandemic, these recommendations can feel insufficient and be easily brushed aside in the moment. Complicating matters, various physical distancing, quarantine, and isolation procedures forced us to reimagine how these strategies can be implemented safely while maintaining their effectiveness. For exa","PeriodicalId":47424,"journal":{"name":"Health & Social Work","volume":"46 4","pages":"245-246"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2021-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8500082/pdf/hlab030.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39471191","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The relationship between chronic medical conditions and PTSD within-race in Black adults is not well understood and there exists a dearth of empirical research investigating the gender differences. Cross-sectional data from the National Survey of American Life were used to examine the relationship between PTSD and obesity, hypertension, diabetes, heart disease, and asthma (five of the most commonly identified COVID-19 underlying medical conditions) among Black adults in the United States. Results from modified Poisson regression analyses revealed that Black adults across all three groups (overall, male, and female samples) who reported two or more chronic medical conditions had a higher prevalence of PTSD than those who reported zero or one. Black men with obesity, diabetes, or heart disease and Black women with asthma had a higher prevalence of PTSD than those who did not report obesity, diabetes, heart disease, or asthma. Findings from this study underscore the need to alert social workers to the potential relationship between obesity, diabetes, or heart disease and PTSD for Black men and asthma and PTSD for Black women to help develop culturally appropriate biopsychosocial-spiritual assessments, with a measured focus on Black men based on their comparatively worse health status.
{"title":"Chronic Medical Conditions as Predictors of the Likelihood of PTSD among Black Adults: Preparing for the Aftermath of COVID-19.","authors":"Paul Archibald, Roland Thorpe","doi":"10.1093/hsw/hlab025","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/hsw/hlab025","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The relationship between chronic medical conditions and PTSD within-race in Black adults is not well understood and there exists a dearth of empirical research investigating the gender differences. Cross-sectional data from the National Survey of American Life were used to examine the relationship between PTSD and obesity, hypertension, diabetes, heart disease, and asthma (five of the most commonly identified COVID-19 underlying medical conditions) among Black adults in the United States. Results from modified Poisson regression analyses revealed that Black adults across all three groups (overall, male, and female samples) who reported two or more chronic medical conditions had a higher prevalence of PTSD than those who reported zero or one. Black men with obesity, diabetes, or heart disease and Black women with asthma had a higher prevalence of PTSD than those who did not report obesity, diabetes, heart disease, or asthma. Findings from this study underscore the need to alert social workers to the potential relationship between obesity, diabetes, or heart disease and PTSD for Black men and asthma and PTSD for Black women to help develop culturally appropriate biopsychosocial-spiritual assessments, with a measured focus on Black men based on their comparatively worse health status.</p>","PeriodicalId":47424,"journal":{"name":"Health & Social Work","volume":"46 4","pages":"268-276"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2021-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39498044","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Transgender people often avoid going to the bathroom in public, at work, and at school because they are afraid of facing problems while using them. Utilizing the 2015 U.S. Transgender Survey, the largest sample to date with transgender people, this study (N = 25,694) aimed to understand the factors associated with avoiding bathroom usage as well as how the avoidance may impact the health of transgender people. Logistic regression was used to examine factors associated with avoidance of bathrooms. More than six out of 10 transgender people avoided using public bathrooms. Being questioned about a person's bathroom choice, gender identity, perception of gender identity, previous experiences of discrimination, suicidal ideation, and serious psychological distress were found to be associated with avoidance of public bathrooms due to fears of having problems when using them. Gender-neutral bathrooms that are safe and accessible for transgender people need to be more available and accessible in the United States.
{"title":"Having to \"Hold It\": Factors That Influence the Avoidance of Using Public Bathrooms among Transgender People.","authors":"Justin Evan Lerner","doi":"10.1093/hsw/hlab027","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/hsw/hlab027","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Transgender people often avoid going to the bathroom in public, at work, and at school because they are afraid of facing problems while using them. Utilizing the 2015 U.S. Transgender Survey, the largest sample to date with transgender people, this study (N = 25,694) aimed to understand the factors associated with avoiding bathroom usage as well as how the avoidance may impact the health of transgender people. Logistic regression was used to examine factors associated with avoidance of bathrooms. More than six out of 10 transgender people avoided using public bathrooms. Being questioned about a person's bathroom choice, gender identity, perception of gender identity, previous experiences of discrimination, suicidal ideation, and serious psychological distress were found to be associated with avoidance of public bathrooms due to fears of having problems when using them. Gender-neutral bathrooms that are safe and accessible for transgender people need to be more available and accessible in the United States.</p>","PeriodicalId":47424,"journal":{"name":"Health & Social Work","volume":"46 4","pages":"260-267"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2021-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39476345","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Co-occurring traumatic brain injury (TBI) and substance use disorders (SUD) are a major public health concern, yet TBI is often underrecognized within SUD treatment organizations. Social workers in these organizations are well positioned to deliver tailored treatment, but little is known about what social workers are doing to address the needs of these clients. The purpose of this study was to examine current social work practices in providing care to clients with co-occurring TBI and SUD. Using grounded theory methodology, authors conducted semistructured interviews with 17 licensed social workers employed in various SUD treatment settings. Transcript coding was conducted through an iterative process and data were analyzed using NVivo (version 12.0). Results demonstrated that social workers lack basic knowledge on the relationship between TBI and SUD. Additional barriers to providing care included lack of skills to identify history of TBI, lack of community resources, poor agency collaboration, and access-to-care restrictions. Social workers identified their primary roles as advocacy, care coordination, and serving on multidisciplinary teams. These results informed development of a capacity-building model, with recommendations for social work situated in each level of the socioecological framework. This study has important implications for building workforce capacity and collaborative care systems to improve client outcomes.
{"title":"Social Work Care in Traumatic Brain Injury and Substance Use Disorder Treatment: A Capacity-Building Model.","authors":"Kathryn A Coxe, Erica K Pence, Njeri Kagotho","doi":"10.1093/hsw/hlab023","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/hsw/hlab023","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Co-occurring traumatic brain injury (TBI) and substance use disorders (SUD) are a major public health concern, yet TBI is often underrecognized within SUD treatment organizations. Social workers in these organizations are well positioned to deliver tailored treatment, but little is known about what social workers are doing to address the needs of these clients. The purpose of this study was to examine current social work practices in providing care to clients with co-occurring TBI and SUD. Using grounded theory methodology, authors conducted semistructured interviews with 17 licensed social workers employed in various SUD treatment settings. Transcript coding was conducted through an iterative process and data were analyzed using NVivo (version 12.0). Results demonstrated that social workers lack basic knowledge on the relationship between TBI and SUD. Additional barriers to providing care included lack of skills to identify history of TBI, lack of community resources, poor agency collaboration, and access-to-care restrictions. Social workers identified their primary roles as advocacy, care coordination, and serving on multidisciplinary teams. These results informed development of a capacity-building model, with recommendations for social work situated in each level of the socioecological framework. This study has important implications for building workforce capacity and collaborative care systems to improve client outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":47424,"journal":{"name":"Health & Social Work","volume":"46 4","pages":"277-288"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2021-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39520135","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Student Mental Health: A Guide for Teachers, School and District Leaders, School Psychologists and Nurses, Social Workers, Counselors, and Parents. William Dikel","authors":"M. Smith","doi":"10.1093/hsw/hlab022","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/hsw/hlab022","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":47424,"journal":{"name":"Health & Social Work","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2021-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46285078","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Direct care workers (DCWs) provide personal care, emotional support, and companionship, helping older adults maintain quality lives. DCWs earn low wages, have little training, and experience high turnover rates. While the demand for DCWs grows, real wages continue to fall. Undervaluing DCWs threatens the continuity and quality of care that older adults receive. Through the social work grand challenges lens, this article discusses two qualitative studies, in home care (n = 24) and nursing homes (n = 23), that demonstrate that while DCWs help advance long and productive lives, they experience extreme economic inequality and lack equal opportunity and justice. The article concludes with a discussion of social work's role in advancing opportunity and justice.
{"title":"Direct Caregiving in Older Adults: How Systems of Care Perpetuate the Grand Challenges and What Social Workers Can Do about It.","authors":"Nancy Kusmaul, Stephanie P Wladkowski","doi":"10.1093/hsw/hlab017","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/hsw/hlab017","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Direct care workers (DCWs) provide personal care, emotional support, and companionship, helping older adults maintain quality lives. DCWs earn low wages, have little training, and experience high turnover rates. While the demand for DCWs grows, real wages continue to fall. Undervaluing DCWs threatens the continuity and quality of care that older adults receive. Through the social work grand challenges lens, this article discusses two qualitative studies, in home care (n = 24) and nursing homes (n = 23), that demonstrate that while DCWs help advance long and productive lives, they experience extreme economic inequality and lack equal opportunity and justice. The article concludes with a discussion of social work's role in advancing opportunity and justice.</p>","PeriodicalId":47424,"journal":{"name":"Health & Social Work","volume":"46 3","pages":"218-226"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2021-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39231455","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}