首页 > 最新文献

Journal of Research in Reading最新文献

英文 中文
Development and validation of the simplified Chinese Author Recognition Test: Evidence from eye movements of Chinese adults in Mainland China 简体中文作者识别测验的开发与验证:来自中国大陆成年人眼球运动的证据
IF 2.7 2区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2023-10-06 DOI: 10.1111/1467-9817.12437
Yongqiang Su, Yixun Li, Hong Li

Background

It is well evident that individuals' levels of print exposure are significantly correlated with their reading ability across languages, and an author recognition test is commonly used to measure print exposure objectively. For the first time, the current work developed and validated a Simplified Chinese Author Recognition Test (SCART) and examined its role in explaining Chinese online reading.

Methods

In Study 1, we constructed the SCART for readers of simplified Chinese and validated the test using data collected from 203 young adults in Mainland China. Participants were measured on the SCART and three self-report tasks about their reading experiences and habits. Study 2 recruited additional 68 young adults in Mainland and measured their print exposure (with the same tasks used in Study 1), reading-related cognitive ability (working memory, rapid automatic naming, Chinese character reading, and vocabulary knowledge), and Chinese online reading via an eye-tracking passage reading task.

Results

Results of Study 1 support the high reliability and validity of the SCART. Results of Study 2 indicate that SCART scores significantly predicted participants' online reading processing while controlling for subjective reading experiences and habits, and reading-related cognitive abilities. Across two studies, we found converging evidence that the in-depth recognition of the authors (i.e., participants have read the books written by these authors) appears to be a better indicator of print exposure than the superficial recognition of the author names.

Conclusions

Taken together, this work filled in the gap in the literature by providing an evidence-based, objective print exposure measure for simplified Chinese and contributes to a broader understanding of print exposure and online reading processing across different writing systems.

研究背景 众所周知,个人的印刷品接触水平与其跨语言阅读能力显著相关,而作者识别测验通常被用来客观测量印刷品接触水平。本研究首次开发并验证了简体中文作者识别测验(SCART),并考察了它在解释中文在线阅读中的作用。 研究方法 在研究 1 中,我们为简体中文读者构建了 SCART,并使用从中国大陆 203 名青少年中收集的数据对该测试进行了验证。我们对参与者进行了 SCART 测验,并对他们的阅读经验和习惯进行了三项自我报告。研究 2 在中国大陆招募了另外 68 名青少年,并通过眼动跟踪段落阅读任务测量了他们的印刷接触情况(与研究 1 中使用的任务相同)、与阅读相关的认知能力(工作记忆、快速自动命名、汉字阅读和词汇知识)以及中文在线阅读情况。 结果 研究 1 的结果支持 SCART 的高度可靠性和有效性。研究 2 的结果表明,在控制主观阅读经验和习惯以及与阅读相关的认知能力的情况下,SCART 分数能显著预测受试者的在线阅读处理能力。在两项研究中,我们发现了一致的证据,即对作者的深入认识(即参与者读过这些作者所写的书)似乎比对作者姓名的肤浅认识更能说明阅读量。 结论 综上所述,这项研究提供了一种基于证据的、客观的简体中文印刷接触测量方法,填补了文献空白,并有助于更广泛地了解不同书写系统中的印刷接触和在线阅读处理。
{"title":"Development and validation of the simplified Chinese Author Recognition Test: Evidence from eye movements of Chinese adults in Mainland China","authors":"Yongqiang Su,&nbsp;Yixun Li,&nbsp;Hong Li","doi":"10.1111/1467-9817.12437","DOIUrl":"10.1111/1467-9817.12437","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Background</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>It is well evident that individuals' levels of print exposure are significantly correlated with their reading ability across languages, and an author recognition test is commonly used to measure print exposure objectively. For the first time, the current work developed and validated a Simplified Chinese Author Recognition Test (SCART) and examined its role in explaining Chinese online reading.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>In Study 1, we constructed the SCART for readers of simplified Chinese and validated the test using data collected from 203 young adults in Mainland China. Participants were measured on the SCART and three self-report tasks about their reading experiences and habits. Study 2 recruited additional 68 young adults in Mainland and measured their print exposure (with the same tasks used in Study 1), reading-related cognitive ability (working memory, rapid automatic naming, Chinese character reading, and vocabulary knowledge), and Chinese online reading via an eye-tracking passage reading task.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Results of Study 1 support the high reliability and validity of the SCART. Results of Study 2 indicate that SCART scores significantly predicted participants' online reading processing while controlling for subjective reading experiences and habits, and reading-related cognitive abilities. Across two studies, we found converging evidence that the in-depth recognition of the authors (i.e., participants have read the books written by these authors) appears to be a better indicator of print exposure than the superficial recognition of the author names.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusions</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Taken together, this work filled in the gap in the literature by providing an evidence-based, objective print exposure measure for simplified Chinese and contributes to a broader understanding of print exposure and online reading processing across different writing systems.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":47611,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research in Reading","volume":"47 1","pages":"20-44"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2023-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135347063","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
What's format got to do with it? A comparison of three syntactic comprehension measures 格式有什么关系?三种句法理解测量方法的比较
IF 2.7 2区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2023-10-05 DOI: 10.1111/1467-9817.12438
Jessie Leigh Nielsen, Rikke Vang Christensen, Mads Poulsen

Background

Studies of syntactic comprehension and reading comprehension use a wide range of syntactic comprehension tests that vary considerably in format. The goal of this study was to examine to which extent different formats of syntactic comprehension tests measure the same construct.

Methods

Sixty-nine Grade 4 students completed multiple tests of decoding, vocabulary, fluid-reasoning skill, reading comprehension and three tests of syntactic comprehension: the TROG-2, a sentence repetition test and a whodunnit test.

Results

There was limited shared variance between the syntactic comprehension tests, indicating that they only partially tapped into the same construct. Furthermore, the TROG-2 was more highly correlated with fluid-reasoning skill than the other syntax tests. Finally, the TROG-2 and the whodunnit test explained additional variance in reading comprehension after controls, while sentence repetition did not.

Conclusions

There are important differences between syntactic comprehension tests. This has consequences both for the interpretation of previous studies of syntactic comprehension and reading comprehension and for the design of future studies as the choice of syntactic comprehension measure may directly influence the results of the study.

研究背景 对句法理解和阅读理解的研究使用了大量的句法理解测试,这些测试的形式差异很大。本研究的目的是考察不同形式的句法理解测试在多大程度上测量了相同的结构。 方法 69 名四年级学生完成了解码、词汇、流畅推理能力、阅读理解等多项测试,以及三项句法理解测试:TROG-2、句子重复测试和侦探小说测试。 结果 句法理解测试之间的共享方差有限,这表明它们只是部分地挖掘了同一结构。此外,与其他句法测试相比,TROG-2 与流畅推理能力的相关性更高。最后,TROG-2 和whodunnit 测试能解释对照组之后阅读理解能力的额外差异,而句子重复则不能。 结论 句法理解测试之间存在重要差异。这既影响了对以往句法理解和阅读理解研究的解释,也影响了未来研究的设计,因为句法理解测试方法的选择可能会直接影响研究结果。
{"title":"What's format got to do with it? A comparison of three syntactic comprehension measures","authors":"Jessie Leigh Nielsen,&nbsp;Rikke Vang Christensen,&nbsp;Mads Poulsen","doi":"10.1111/1467-9817.12438","DOIUrl":"10.1111/1467-9817.12438","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Background</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Studies of syntactic comprehension and reading comprehension use a wide range of syntactic comprehension tests that vary considerably in format. The goal of this study was to examine to which extent different formats of syntactic comprehension tests measure the same construct.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Sixty-nine Grade 4 students completed multiple tests of decoding, vocabulary, fluid-reasoning skill, reading comprehension and three tests of syntactic comprehension: the TROG-2, a sentence repetition test and a whodunnit test.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>There was limited shared variance between the syntactic comprehension tests, indicating that they only partially tapped into the same construct. Furthermore, the TROG-2 was more highly correlated with fluid-reasoning skill than the other syntax tests. Finally, the TROG-2 and the whodunnit test explained additional variance in reading comprehension after controls, while sentence repetition did not.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusions</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>There are important differences between syntactic comprehension tests. This has consequences both for the interpretation of previous studies of syntactic comprehension and reading comprehension and for the design of future studies as the choice of syntactic comprehension measure may directly influence the results of the study.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":47611,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research in Reading","volume":"47 1","pages":"1-19"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2023-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135482645","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Classroom effects are as large as grade-level effects on curriculum-based measurement maze reading scores of secondary school students with and without special educational needs 课堂效应与年级水平对有特殊教育需求和无特殊教育需求中学生基于课程测量的迷宫阅读成绩的影响一样大
IF 2.7 2区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2023-09-18 DOI: 10.1111/1467-9817.12436
Jana Jungjohann, Michael Schurig, Markus Gebhardt

Background

Previous studies used curriculum-based measurement (CBM) maze scores as an indicator of the reading comprehension level of secondary school students with and without special educational needs in multiple grades, pinpointing a high influence of both student- and context-related variables. However, studies on cumulative influence are necessary for better understanding of data-based decision-making.

Methods

We examined a sample of 1066 secondary school students using four linear mixed-effect models: How much variance in maze scores exists between multiple student characteristics (i.e., gender, immigration background, learning disability and developmental language disorder) and context variables (i.e., classroom, grade and school type) across Grades 5–8?

Results

The intra-class correlation (ICC) results show that the influence by the context-related variable classroom (ICC = .094) is almost as large as by the variable grade level (ICC = .126). School type (i.e., inclusive school vs. special school) has the least influence (ICC = .02). In addition, the effects of student-related variables explain only a small proportion of the variance (marginal R2 = .114).

Conclusions

Maze scores can be used as a screening instrument for students with multiple characteristics across grades; they also show that it makes no difference which type of school students attend. As teachers and further classroom-related variables have almost as much influence as grade level, we discuss that teachers can minimise classroom effects by using maze scores as a formative approach.

背景先前的研究使用基于课程的测量(CBM)迷宫得分作为多个年级有和没有特殊教育需求的中学生阅读理解水平的指标,指出了学生和情境相关变量的高度影响。然而,对累积影响的研究对于更好地理解基于数据的决策是必要的。方法我们使用四个线性混合效应模型对1066名中学生进行了抽样调查:不同年级的多个学生特征(即性别、移民背景、学习障碍和发展性语言障碍)和情境变量(即课堂、年级和学校类型)之间的迷宫得分差异有多大5–8?结果班内相关性(ICC)结果显示,与情境相关的可变课堂(ICC=.094)的影响几乎与可变年级水平(ICC=.126)的影响一样大。学校类型(即包容性学校与特殊学校)的影响最小(ICC=.02)。此外,学生相关变量的影响只解释了一小部分方差(边际R2=0.114)。结论迷宫分数可以作为跨年级具有多种特征的学生的筛选工具;他们还表明,学生就读哪种类型的学校没有区别。由于教师和其他课堂相关变量的影响几乎与年级水平一样大,我们讨论了教师可以通过使用迷宫得分作为一种形成性方法来最大限度地减少课堂影响。
{"title":"Classroom effects are as large as grade-level effects on curriculum-based measurement maze reading scores of secondary school students with and without special educational needs","authors":"Jana Jungjohann,&nbsp;Michael Schurig,&nbsp;Markus Gebhardt","doi":"10.1111/1467-9817.12436","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.12436","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Background</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Previous studies used curriculum-based measurement (CBM) maze scores as an indicator of the reading comprehension level of secondary school students with and without special educational needs in multiple grades, pinpointing a high influence of both student- and context-related variables. However, studies on cumulative influence are necessary for better understanding of data-based decision-making.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>We examined a sample of 1066 secondary school students using four linear mixed-effect models: How much variance in maze scores exists between multiple student characteristics (i.e., gender, immigration background, learning disability and developmental language disorder) and context variables (i.e., classroom, grade and school type) across Grades 5–8?</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>The intra-class correlation (<i>ICC</i>) results show that the influence by the context-related variable classroom (<i>ICC</i> = .094) is almost as large as by the variable grade level (<i>ICC</i> = .126). School type (i.e., inclusive school vs. special school) has the least influence (<i>ICC</i> = .02). In addition, the effects of student-related variables explain only a small proportion of the variance (marginal <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = .114).</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusions</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Maze scores can be used as a screening instrument for students with multiple characteristics across grades; they also show that it makes no difference which type of school students attend. As teachers and further classroom-related variables have almost as much influence as grade level, we discuss that teachers can minimise classroom effects by using maze scores as a formative approach.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":47611,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research in Reading","volume":"46 4","pages":"411-429"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2023-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1467-9817.12436","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"50137449","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Effects of word emotional experience and participant emotionality in lexical decision 词汇情感体验和参与者情感在词汇决策中的作用
IF 2.7 2区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2023-09-06 DOI: 10.1111/1467-9817.12435
Ethan Prueitt, Mark Yates

Background

Previous research has shown that the emotional content of words affects how quickly they are recognised. One recent measure of word emotionality is emotional experience that measures the degree to which reading a word can invoke emotional experiences tied to the word. Words that are higher in emotional experience are recognised more rapidly in the lexical decision task.

Methods

The current study examines how words' emotional experience and participants' emotionality affect performance on the lexical decision task. To this end, participants were given five emotion measures and completed a lexical decision task with words varying on emotional experience.

Results

It was found that participants who scored higher on the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule showed a weaker emotional experience effect. No other emotion measures interacted with emotional experience.

Conclusions

These results are predicted by and interpreted within a framework where the semantic representation of words includes emotion information that is grounded in experience of our internal states.

背景先前的研究表明,单词的情感内容会影响它们被识别的速度。最近对单词情感性的一种衡量是情感体验,它衡量阅读一个单词能在多大程度上唤起与该单词相关的情感体验。情绪体验较高的单词在词汇决策任务中被更快地识别。方法本研究考察了词汇的情绪体验和参与者的情绪性如何影响词汇决策任务的表现。为此,参与者被给予五种情绪测量,并完成了一项词汇决策任务,其中单词因情绪体验而异。结果研究发现,在积极和消极情绪表中得分较高的参与者表现出较弱的情绪体验效应。没有其他情绪测量与情绪体验相互作用。结论这些结果是在一个框架内预测和解释的,其中单词的语义表示包括基于我们内部状态经验的情感信息。
{"title":"Effects of word emotional experience and participant emotionality in lexical decision","authors":"Ethan Prueitt,&nbsp;Mark Yates","doi":"10.1111/1467-9817.12435","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.12435","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Background</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Previous research has shown that the emotional content of words affects how quickly they are recognised. One recent measure of word emotionality is emotional experience that measures the degree to which reading a word can invoke emotional experiences tied to the word. Words that are higher in emotional experience are recognised more rapidly in the lexical decision task.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>The current study examines how words' emotional experience and participants' emotionality affect performance on the lexical decision task. To this end, participants were given five emotion measures and completed a lexical decision task with words varying on emotional experience.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>It was found that participants who scored higher on the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule showed a weaker emotional experience effect. No other emotion measures interacted with emotional experience.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusions</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>These results are predicted by and interpreted within a framework where the semantic representation of words includes emotion information that is grounded in experience of our internal states.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":47611,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research in Reading","volume":"46 4","pages":"430-440"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2023-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"50123439","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Effects of word emotional experience and participant emotionality in lexical decision 词汇情绪体验和参与者情绪对词汇决策的影响
IF 2.7 2区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2023-09-06 DOI: 10.1111/1467-9817.12435
Ethan Prueitt, Mark Yates
Previous research has shown that the emotional content of words affects how quickly they are recognised. One recent measure of word emotionality is emotional experience that measures the degree to which reading a word can invoke emotional experiences tied to the word. Words that are higher in emotional experience are recognised more rapidly in the lexical decision task.The current study examines how words' emotional experience and participants' emotionality affect performance on the lexical decision task. To this end, participants were given five emotion measures and completed a lexical decision task with words varying on emotional experience.It was found that participants who scored higher on the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule showed a weaker emotional experience effect. No other emotion measures interacted with emotional experience.These results are predicted by and interpreted within a framework where the semantic representation of words includes emotion information that is grounded in experience of our internal states.
先前的研究表明,单词的情感内容会影响它们被识别的速度。最近有一种衡量词汇情绪性的方法是“情感体验”,它衡量的是阅读一个单词能在多大程度上唤起与该单词相关的情感体验。在词汇决策任务中,情感体验较高的单词被识别得更快。本研究考察了词汇的情绪体验和参与者的情绪如何影响词汇决策任务的表现。为此,参与者被给予了五种情绪测量,并完成了一项词汇决策任务,其中的词汇随情绪体验而变化。研究发现,积极和消极情绪量表得分越高的参与者,其情绪体验效应越弱。没有其他情绪测量与情绪体验相互作用。这些结果是通过一个框架来预测和解释的,在这个框架中,单词的语义表示包括基于我们内部状态经验的情感信息。
{"title":"Effects of word emotional experience and participant emotionality in lexical decision","authors":"Ethan Prueitt, Mark Yates","doi":"10.1111/1467-9817.12435","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.12435","url":null,"abstract":"Previous research has shown that the emotional content of words affects how quickly they are recognised. One recent measure of word emotionality is emotional experience that measures the degree to which reading a word can invoke emotional experiences tied to the word. Words that are higher in emotional experience are recognised more rapidly in the lexical decision task.The current study examines how words' emotional experience and participants' emotionality affect performance on the lexical decision task. To this end, participants were given five emotion measures and completed a lexical decision task with words varying on emotional experience.It was found that participants who scored higher on the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule showed a weaker emotional experience effect. No other emotion measures interacted with emotional experience.These results are predicted by and interpreted within a framework where the semantic representation of words includes emotion information that is grounded in experience of our internal states.","PeriodicalId":47611,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research in Reading","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2023-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"62643093","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The imaginary experience of a picture book based on Gaston Bachelard’s image theory : For Lee Sooji’s picture book 基于巴舍拉形象理论的绘本想象体验——以李秀姬绘本为例
IF 2.7 2区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2023-08-31 DOI: 10.17095/jrr.2023.68.10
Woonyoung Lee
{"title":"The imaginary experience of a picture book based on Gaston Bachelard’s image theory : For Lee Sooji’s picture book","authors":"Woonyoung Lee","doi":"10.17095/jrr.2023.68.10","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.17095/jrr.2023.68.10","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":47611,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research in Reading","volume":"50 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2023-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"77709396","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Aspects of establishing the relationship between reading and literature in the language curriculum 在语文课程中建立阅读与文学关系的几个方面
IF 2.7 2区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2023-08-31 DOI: 10.17095/jrr.2023.68.2
Chibeom Park
{"title":"Aspects of establishing the relationship between reading and literature in the language curriculum","authors":"Chibeom Park","doi":"10.17095/jrr.2023.68.2","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.17095/jrr.2023.68.2","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":47611,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research in Reading","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2023-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"72978007","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Changes in the reading society and new reading education : Focusing on changes in the reading environment and educational responses 阅读社会的变迁与新型阅读教育:关注阅读环境的变迁与教育对策
IF 2.7 2区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2023-08-31 DOI: 10.17095/jrr.2023.68.1
Hyuk Suh
{"title":"Changes in the reading society and new reading education : Focusing on changes in the reading environment and educational responses","authors":"Hyuk Suh","doi":"10.17095/jrr.2023.68.1","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.17095/jrr.2023.68.1","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":47611,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research in Reading","volume":"82 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2023-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"79336337","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Question generation and reading education for readers in the artificial intelligence era 人工智能时代读者的问题生成与阅读教育
IF 2.7 2区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2023-08-31 DOI: 10.17095/jrr.2023.68.4
Heejeong Baek
{"title":"Question generation and reading education for readers in the artificial intelligence era","authors":"Heejeong Baek","doi":"10.17095/jrr.2023.68.4","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.17095/jrr.2023.68.4","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":47611,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research in Reading","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2023-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"80141846","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Issues in the design of disciplinary literacy tests using multimodal materials : From a basic academic skills perspective for high school students 多模态材料学科素养测试设计中的问题:基于高中生基本学术技能的视角
IF 2.7 2区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2023-08-31 DOI: 10.17095/jrr.2023.68.7
Sungmin Jang
{"title":"Issues in the design of disciplinary literacy tests using multimodal materials : From a basic academic skills perspective for high school students","authors":"Sungmin Jang","doi":"10.17095/jrr.2023.68.7","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.17095/jrr.2023.68.7","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":47611,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research in Reading","volume":"21 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2023-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"81753315","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Journal of Research in Reading
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1