首页 > 最新文献

Australasian Journal of Educational Technology最新文献

英文 中文
Impact of lecturers’ emotional intelligence on students’ learning and engagement in remote learning spaces: A cross-cultural study 远程学习空间中讲师情商对学生学习和投入的影响:一项跨文化研究
IF 4.1 3区 教育学 Q1 Social Sciences Pub Date : 2022-11-04 DOI: 10.14742/ajet.7848
A. Gunasekara, K. Turner, Chorng Yuan Fung, C. Stough
Higher education institutions have recently transitioned from face-to-face to online teaching and learning environments. However, academic staff lack sufficient training in applying emotional intelligence (EI) skills and strategies in online learning environments. Although literature addressing academics’ EI is sparse, some studies have suggested that lecturers’ EI greatly influences teaching and learning. This study used the concept of EI to understand students’ perceptions of how lecturers’ EI impacted their learning and engagement in an online learning environment. We conducted four online focus group interviews of 14 students pursuing a bachelor’s degree at two campuses of an Australian university, one in Melbourne and the other in Malaysia. Four main themes were identified using thematic analysis. Students discussed their perceptions and experiences on (a) vulnerabilities, coping and empathy; (b) relationships with lecturers, trust and safety; (c) communication, tone and voice; and (d) managing emotions of lecturers. Our findings suggest that lecturers’ EI impacted students’ learning and engagement in online learning spaces. However, the impact differs between Australia and Malaysia due to cultural differences. Drawing on the findings, we present online education good practices grounded in the theory of EI. Lecturers delivering online courses should consider employing these practices for effective teaching.Implications for practice or policy:Higher educational institutions need to support lecturers in developing the necessary EI skills to engage students in online learning.Lecturers need to make meaningful attempts to develop positive relationships with students in online forums to support students’ engagement.Lecturers working in online learning environments need to support students to develop friendships and connections with their peers.Lecturers need to include regular discussion breaks during online lectures to allow students to share their opinions and experiences.
高等教育机构最近已从面对面教学环境过渡到在线教学环境。然而,学术人员在在线学习环境中应用情商(EI)技能和策略方面缺乏足够的培训。尽管关于学者EI的文献很少,但一些研究表明,讲师的EI对教学有很大影响。本研究使用EI的概念来了解学生对讲师的EI如何影响他们在在线学习环境中的学习和参与的看法。我们对在澳大利亚一所大学的两个校区(一个在墨尔本,另一个在马来西亚)攻读学士学位的14名学生进行了四次在线焦点小组访谈。通过专题分析确定了四个主要专题。学生们讨论了他们对(a)脆弱性、应对和同理心的看法和经历;(b) 与讲师的关系、信任和安全;(c) 沟通、语气和声音;以及(d)管理讲师的情绪。我们的研究结果表明,讲师的EI影响了学生在在线学习空间的学习和参与。然而,由于文化差异,澳大利亚和马来西亚的影响有所不同。根据研究结果,我们提出了基于EI理论的在线教育良好实践。提供在线课程的讲师应考虑采用这些做法进行有效教学。对实践或政策的影响:高等教育机构需要支持讲师发展必要的EI技能,让学生参与在线学习。讲师需要做出有意义的尝试,在在线论坛上与学生建立积极的关系,以支持学生的参与。在在线学习环境中工作的讲师需要支持学生与同龄人建立友谊和联系。讲师需要在在线讲座期间定期进行讨论,让学生分享他们的观点和经验。
{"title":"Impact of lecturers’ emotional intelligence on students’ learning and engagement in remote learning spaces: A cross-cultural study","authors":"A. Gunasekara, K. Turner, Chorng Yuan Fung, C. Stough","doi":"10.14742/ajet.7848","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.7848","url":null,"abstract":"Higher education institutions have recently transitioned from face-to-face to online teaching and learning environments. However, academic staff lack sufficient training in applying emotional intelligence (EI) skills and strategies in online learning environments. Although literature addressing academics’ EI is sparse, some studies have suggested that lecturers’ EI greatly influences teaching and learning. This study used the concept of EI to understand students’ perceptions of how lecturers’ EI impacted their learning and engagement in an online learning environment. We conducted four online focus group interviews of 14 students pursuing a bachelor’s degree at two campuses of an Australian university, one in Melbourne and the other in Malaysia. Four main themes were identified using thematic analysis. Students discussed their perceptions and experiences on (a) vulnerabilities, coping and empathy; (b) relationships with lecturers, trust and safety; (c) communication, tone and voice; and (d) managing emotions of lecturers. Our findings suggest that lecturers’ EI impacted students’ learning and engagement in online learning spaces. However, the impact differs between Australia and Malaysia due to cultural differences. Drawing on the findings, we present online education good practices grounded in the theory of EI. Lecturers delivering online courses should consider employing these practices for effective teaching.\u0000Implications for practice or policy:\u0000\u0000Higher educational institutions need to support lecturers in developing the necessary EI skills to engage students in online learning.\u0000Lecturers need to make meaningful attempts to develop positive relationships with students in online forums to support students’ engagement.\u0000Lecturers working in online learning environments need to support students to develop friendships and connections with their peers.\u0000Lecturers need to include regular discussion breaks during online lectures to allow students to share their opinions and experiences.\u0000","PeriodicalId":47812,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Journal of Educational Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.1,"publicationDate":"2022-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45246667","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
What is the metaverse? Definitions, technologies and the community of inquiry 什么是元宇宙?定义,技术和社区的调查
IF 4.1 3区 教育学 Q1 Social Sciences Pub Date : 2022-11-04 DOI: 10.14742/ajet.7945
D. Ng
The term metaverse appeared for the first time in a novel published in 1992. Since the early 2000s, researchers have started to use this term to refer to digital technologies for learners to interact with other users with avatars. The term came to prominence in around 2020 due to the rebranding of Facebook. However, there was no consensus on what kind of technologies should belong to the metaverse and how to conceptualise the term. As such, this paper presents an exploratory review for conceptualising the metaverse based on 19 articles from the Web of Science database. This review focuses on the metaverse trend, how researchers in the past and present conceptualizing the term, and key technologies identified in the metaverse world. The findings identify the major types of technologies used in the metaverse studies and offers a sound theoretical foundation in terms of cognitive, social and teacher presence to understand what future potential of these technologies could bring to online learning. Five major types of technologies are identified which could map to four key elements of the metaverse (i.e., immersion, advanced computing, socialisation, decentralisation). At the end, a model is proposed to connect the key elements of the metaverse and its three presences in the community of inquiry that enhance students’ learning outcomes in the metaverse learning environment.Implications for practice or policy:Educators and researchers could rethink what types of technologies belong to the metaverse and how it has the potential to influence the education sector.Instructional designers could create meaningful learning experiences through the four key elements of the metaverse – immersion, advanced computing, socialisation and decentralisation.Policy-makers and educators could refer to the model of metaverse learning environment to guide their future policy and practices.
“元宇宙”一词首次出现在1992年出版的一部小说中。自21世纪初以来,研究人员开始使用这个术语来指代学习者通过虚拟形象与其他用户互动的数字技术。由于Facebook的品牌重塑,这个词在2020年左右开始流行起来。然而,对于什么样的技术应该属于元宇宙以及如何概念化这个术语,并没有达成共识。因此,本文基于Web of Science数据库中的19篇文章,对元宇宙的概念化进行了探索性回顾。本文主要介绍了虚拟世界的发展趋势、过去和现在的研究人员如何对虚拟世界进行概念化,以及在虚拟世界中确定的关键技术。研究结果确定了虚拟世界研究中使用的主要技术类型,并在认知、社会和教师在场方面提供了良好的理论基础,以了解这些技术未来可能给在线学习带来的潜力。本文确定了五种主要类型的技术,它们可以映射到虚拟世界的四个关键元素(即沉浸式、高级计算、社会化、去中心化)。最后,提出了一个模型来连接元宇宙的关键要素及其在探究社区中的三种存在,从而提高学生在元宇宙学习环境中的学习成果。对实践或政策的影响:教育工作者和研究人员可以重新思考哪些类型的技术属于虚拟世界,以及它如何有可能影响教育部门。教学设计师可以通过虚拟世界的四个关键要素——沉浸式学习、高级计算、社会化和去中心化——创造有意义的学习体验。政策制定者和教育工作者可以参考元学习环境模型来指导他们未来的政策和实践。
{"title":"What is the metaverse? Definitions, technologies and the community of inquiry","authors":"D. Ng","doi":"10.14742/ajet.7945","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.7945","url":null,"abstract":"The term metaverse appeared for the first time in a novel published in 1992. Since the early 2000s, researchers have started to use this term to refer to digital technologies for learners to interact with other users with avatars. The term came to prominence in around 2020 due to the rebranding of Facebook. However, there was no consensus on what kind of technologies should belong to the metaverse and how to conceptualise the term. As such, this paper presents an exploratory review for conceptualising the metaverse based on 19 articles from the Web of Science database. This review focuses on the metaverse trend, how researchers in the past and present conceptualizing the term, and key technologies identified in the metaverse world. The findings identify the major types of technologies used in the metaverse studies and offers a sound theoretical foundation in terms of cognitive, social and teacher presence to understand what future potential of these technologies could bring to online learning. Five major types of technologies are identified which could map to four key elements of the metaverse (i.e., immersion, advanced computing, socialisation, decentralisation). At the end, a model is proposed to connect the key elements of the metaverse and its three presences in the community of inquiry that enhance students’ learning outcomes in the metaverse learning environment.\u0000Implications for practice or policy:\u0000\u0000Educators and researchers could rethink what types of technologies belong to the metaverse and how it has the potential to influence the education sector.\u0000Instructional designers could create meaningful learning experiences through the four key elements of the metaverse – immersion, advanced computing, socialisation and decentralisation.\u0000Policy-makers and educators could refer to the model of metaverse learning environment to guide their future policy and practices.\u0000","PeriodicalId":47812,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Journal of Educational Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.1,"publicationDate":"2022-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42864467","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 29
Addressing the challenges of online and blended STEM learning with grounded design 解决在线和混合STEM学习与基础设计的挑战
IF 4.1 3区 教育学 Q1 Social Sciences Pub Date : 2022-10-30 DOI: 10.14742/ajet.7620
Yunjeong Chang, Eunbae Lee
During the COVID-19 pandemic, online learning became a major alternative to college science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) courses in postsecondary education. Faculty members, although subject matter experts, often lack pedagogical knowledge and training on how to effectively teach new generations of students online, or incorporate appropriate technologies. Faculty teaching online courses needed a new guiding framework to balance domain goals and emerging technologies. We present grounded design for STEM courses to align domain goals and instructional methods and technologies while reflecting instructors’ pedagogical beliefs and addressing cultural and pragmatic issues. It is critical to provide students with aligned STEM learning experience and engagement via defensible theories and research-evidenced pedagogy in online and blended courses while technological, cultural, and pragmatic considerations are also addressed. We suggest grounded design as the conceptual and design framework for designing online and blended courses and discuss the assumptions, approaches, and examples. We provide practical guidelines to apply grounded design to online and blended learning environments and suggest future research. This article can assist both novice and seasoned STEM faculty to connect theory and research to teaching practices and optimise their online and blended courses.Implications for practiceUniversity STEM instructors can use grounded design framework for online, blended, and technology-enhanced teaching.Instructors should begin the course design by aligning the domain goals with optimal psychological and pedagogical foundations.When choosing technology to support online learning, instructors should align it with learning goals and needs of students, and consider cultural and pragmatic foundations.
在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间,在线学习成为高等教育中大学科学、技术、工程和数学(STEM)课程的主要替代方案。教师虽然是学科专家,但往往缺乏教学知识和培训,不知道如何有效地在线教授新一代学生,或采用适当的技术。教授在线课程的教师需要一个新的指导框架来平衡领域目标和新兴技术。我们提出了STEM课程的接地设计,以协调领域目标和教学方法和技术,同时反映教师的教学信念,并解决文化和实用问题。在在线和混合课程中,通过可辩护的理论和研究证明的教学法,为学生提供一致的STEM学习经验和参与是至关重要的,同时也要考虑技术、文化和实用主义方面的考虑。我们建议将基础设计作为设计在线和混合课程的概念和设计框架,并讨论假设、方法和示例。我们提供实用的指导方针,将接地设计应用于在线和混合学习环境,并建议未来的研究。本文可以帮助新手和经验丰富的STEM教师将理论和研究与教学实践联系起来,并优化他们的在线和混合课程。对实践的启示大学STEM教师可以使用基于基础的设计框架进行在线、混合和技术增强的教学。教师应该将领域目标与最佳的心理和教学基础结合起来,开始课程设计。在选择支持在线学习的技术时,教师应使其与学生的学习目标和需求保持一致,并考虑文化和实用基础。
{"title":"Addressing the challenges of online and blended STEM learning with grounded design","authors":"Yunjeong Chang, Eunbae Lee","doi":"10.14742/ajet.7620","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.7620","url":null,"abstract":"During the COVID-19 pandemic, online learning became a major alternative to college science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) courses in postsecondary education. Faculty members, although subject matter experts, often lack pedagogical knowledge and training on how to effectively teach new generations of students online, or incorporate appropriate technologies. Faculty teaching online courses needed a new guiding framework to balance domain goals and emerging technologies. We present grounded design for STEM courses to align domain goals and instructional methods and technologies while reflecting instructors’ pedagogical beliefs and addressing cultural and pragmatic issues. It is critical to provide students with aligned STEM learning experience and engagement via defensible theories and research-evidenced pedagogy in online and blended courses while technological, cultural, and pragmatic considerations are also addressed. We suggest grounded design as the conceptual and design framework for designing online and blended courses and discuss the assumptions, approaches, and examples. We provide practical guidelines to apply grounded design to online and blended learning environments and suggest future research. This article can assist both novice and seasoned STEM faculty to connect theory and research to teaching practices and optimise their online and blended courses.\u0000Implications for practice\u0000\u0000University STEM instructors can use grounded design framework for online, blended, and technology-enhanced teaching.\u0000Instructors should begin the course design by aligning the domain goals with optimal psychological and pedagogical foundations.\u0000When choosing technology to support online learning, instructors should align it with learning goals and needs of students, and consider cultural and pragmatic foundations.\u0000","PeriodicalId":47812,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Journal of Educational Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.1,"publicationDate":"2022-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41874444","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A technology-enhanced scaffolding instructional design for fully online courses 一种用于完全在线课程的技术增强的脚手架教学设计
IF 4.1 3区 教育学 Q1 Social Sciences Pub Date : 2022-10-30 DOI: 10.14742/ajet.6991
Juan Yang, Rui Jiang, Han Su
The COVID-19 pandemic has forced teachers to implement fully online teaching. This study reviewed the popular technologies that are used in online learning, as well as the advantages and difficulties of applying fully online courses for formal education. Based on this research background, this study proposed a nested scaffolding design of an online course for 215 college students in China with the help of six technological tools, which effectively replaced face-to-face interactions and significantly improved the usage of the supporting learning platform. The inner-outer learning cycles supported by the technological tools improved the quality of the scaffolding conversations, reduced the scaffolding time cost that teachers had to expend and enhanced the effectiveness of the individualised scaffolding instructions.Implications for practice or policy:First-year students’ learning outcomes can be improved by the scaffolding support from Web 2.0 resource URLs, a small private online course, and EducCoder resources.Course leaders should construct at least 3–5 stage-wise evaluations to deconstruct the big learning process into several observable learning cycles, making the Kolb (1984) cycles controllable.Assessors may need to consider involving various exercises, such as quizzes, online experiments and synthesised tasks to facilitate students’ learning.
新冠肺炎疫情迫使教师实施全面在线教学。本研究回顾了在线学习中使用的流行技术,以及将完全在线课程应用于正规教育的优势和困难。基于这一研究背景,本研究在六种技术工具的帮助下,为中国215名大学生的在线课程提出了嵌套脚手架设计,有效地取代了面对面的互动,并显著提高了支持学习平台的使用率。技术工具支持的内外学习周期提高了脚手架对话的质量,降低了教师必须花费的脚手架时间成本,并提高了个性化脚手架教学的有效性。对实践或政策的影响:一年级学生的学习成绩可以通过Web2.0资源URL、小型私人在线课程和EducCode资源的脚手架支持来提高。课程领导者应构建至少3-5个阶段性评估,将大的学习过程解构为几个可观察的学习周期,使Kolb(1984)周期可控。评估人员可能需要考虑参与各种练习,如测验、在线实验和综合任务,以促进学生的学习。
{"title":"A technology-enhanced scaffolding instructional design for fully online courses","authors":"Juan Yang, Rui Jiang, Han Su","doi":"10.14742/ajet.6991","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.6991","url":null,"abstract":"The COVID-19 pandemic has forced teachers to implement fully online teaching. This study reviewed the popular technologies that are used in online learning, as well as the advantages and difficulties of applying fully online courses for formal education. Based on this research background, this study proposed a nested scaffolding design of an online course for 215 college students in China with the help of six technological tools, which effectively replaced face-to-face interactions and significantly improved the usage of the supporting learning platform. The inner-outer learning cycles supported by the technological tools improved the quality of the scaffolding conversations, reduced the scaffolding time cost that teachers had to expend and enhanced the effectiveness of the individualised scaffolding instructions.\u0000Implications for practice or policy:\u0000\u0000First-year students’ learning outcomes can be improved by the scaffolding support from Web 2.0 resource URLs, a small private online course, and EducCoder resources.\u0000Course leaders should construct at least 3–5 stage-wise evaluations to deconstruct the big learning process into several observable learning cycles, making the Kolb (1984) cycles controllable.\u0000Assessors may need to consider involving various exercises, such as quizzes, online experiments and synthesised tasks to facilitate students’ learning.\u0000","PeriodicalId":47812,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Journal of Educational Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.1,"publicationDate":"2022-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48155194","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
The current research trend of artificial intelligence in language learning: A systematic empirical literature review from an activity theory perspective 人工智能在语言学习中的研究趋势——基于活动理论的系统实证文献综述
IF 4.1 3区 教育学 Q1 Social Sciences Pub Date : 2022-10-02 DOI: 10.14742/ajet.7492
Hongzhi Yang, Suna Kyun
Although the field of artificial intelligence (AI) has rapidly developed, there has been little research to review, describe, and analyse the trends and development of empirical research on AI-supported language learning. This paper selected and analysed 25 empirical research papers on AI-supported language learning published in the last 15 years. These empirical studies were analysed using the activity theory from seven constituents: tool, subject, object, rules, community, division of labour, and outcome. A key contribution of this paper is the use of activity theory to illustrate the dynamic interactions and contradictions between the seven elements. AI-supported technology as a mediating tool demonstrated some effectiveness in language learning but needs further improvement in the use of language for communication and collaborative design. We argue that teachers’ intervention and configuration of AI-supported language learning in the pedagogical design plays an important role in the effectiveness of learning. More research is needed to explore the use of AI-supported language learning in the classroom or the real-life learning context.Implications for practice or policy:Research on AI-supported language learning should view teacher and students as active agents in interacting with technology and making transformations in real life learning situations.More research should focus on productive dialogue and communication in AI-supported language learning with collaborative design.A mixed module of AI-supported language learning and formal teacher instruction should be incorporated in pedagogical design.
尽管人工智能领域发展迅速,但很少有研究回顾、描述和分析人工智能支持的语言学习实证研究的趋势和发展。本文选取并分析了过去15年中发表的25篇关于人工智能支持的语言学习的实证研究论文。这些实证研究是使用活动理论从七个组成部分进行分析的:工具、主体、对象、规则、社区、分工和结果。本文的一个重要贡献是使用活动理论来说明七要素之间的动态互动和矛盾。人工智能支持的技术作为一种中介工具在语言学习中表现出了一定的有效性,但在沟通和协作设计中使用语言方面需要进一步改进。我们认为,教师在教学设计中对人工智能支持的语言学习的干预和配置对学习的有效性起着重要作用。需要更多的研究来探索在课堂或现实生活中使用人工智能支持的语言学习。对实践或政策的影响:人工智能支持的语言学习研究应将教师和学生视为与技术互动和在现实生活学习环境中进行变革的积极参与者。更多的研究应该集中在人工智能支持的语言学习与协作设计中的富有成效的对话和交流上。人工智能支持的语言学习和正式教师教学的混合模块应纳入教学设计。
{"title":"The current research trend of artificial intelligence in language learning: A systematic empirical literature review from an activity theory perspective","authors":"Hongzhi Yang, Suna Kyun","doi":"10.14742/ajet.7492","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.7492","url":null,"abstract":"Although the field of artificial intelligence (AI) has rapidly developed, there has been little research to review, describe, and analyse the trends and development of empirical research on AI-supported language learning. This paper selected and analysed 25 empirical research papers on AI-supported language learning published in the last 15 years. These empirical studies were analysed using the activity theory from seven constituents: tool, subject, object, rules, community, division of labour, and outcome. A key contribution of this paper is the use of activity theory to illustrate the dynamic interactions and contradictions between the seven elements. AI-supported technology as a mediating tool demonstrated some effectiveness in language learning but needs further improvement in the use of language for communication and collaborative design. We argue that teachers’ intervention and configuration of AI-supported language learning in the pedagogical design plays an important role in the effectiveness of learning. More research is needed to explore the use of AI-supported language learning in the classroom or the real-life learning context.\u0000Implications for practice or policy:\u0000\u0000Research on AI-supported language learning should view teacher and students as active agents in interacting with technology and making transformations in real life learning situations.\u0000More research should focus on productive dialogue and communication in AI-supported language learning with collaborative design.\u0000A mixed module of AI-supported language learning and formal teacher instruction should be incorporated in pedagogical design.\u0000","PeriodicalId":47812,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Journal of Educational Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.1,"publicationDate":"2022-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49265512","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5
Preparing pre-service teachers for instructional innovation with ICT via co-design practice 通过共同设计实践,为职前教师做好信息通信技术教学创新的准备
IF 4.1 3区 教育学 Q1 Social Sciences Pub Date : 2022-10-02 DOI: 10.14742/ajet.7743
Wenli Chen, Zhongling Pi, Jesmine S. H. Tan, Qianru Lyu
Information and communications technology (ICT) is rapidly changing how we teach and how we learn. ICT can not only act as a teaching and learning aid but also reshape the delivery of instruction and bring about changes in education. Research has largely examined the effects of teacher education programs on their knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs of technology integration and relatively little attention has been paid to their ability to use ICT to innovate instruction. This study examined how pre-teachers engaged in co-design via Google Slides, and how their behavioural characteristics influenced their improvement of instructional innovation with ICT of lesson design. The results of correlation and step regression analyses and lag sequential analysis showed that behaviours of engagement into individual ideation and within-group ideation in co-design activities positively related to the pre-service teachers’ innovations of lesson designs (i.e., usefulness and originality). The clarification type and positive affection type of peer feedback negatively related and predicted their innovations, and the worst-performed group tended to directly copy information from peer feedback. The implications of how pre-service teachers engaging in co-design activities affect their instructional innovations with ICT are discussed.Implications for practice or policyCo-design activities are helpful for instructional innovation for pre-service teachers.Pre-service teachers are encouraged to engage in individual ideation, group ideation, and peer feedback during co-design activities.
信息和通信技术正在迅速改变我们的教学方式和学习方式。信息和通信技术不仅可以起到教学和学习辅助的作用,还可以重塑教学方式,带来教育变革。研究在很大程度上考察了教师教育项目对他们的知识、态度和技术整合信念的影响,而对他们使用信息通信技术创新教学的能力关注相对较少。本研究考察了学前教师如何通过谷歌幻灯片参与共同设计,以及他们的行为特征如何影响他们利用课程设计的ICT改进教学创新。相关分析、逐步回归分析和滞后序列分析结果表明,在共同设计活动中,参与个人意念和群体内意念的行为与职前教师的课程设计创新(即有用性和独创性)呈正相关。同伴反馈的澄清型和正向情感型对其创新具有负相关和预测作用,表现最差的群体倾向于直接复制同伴反馈中的信息。讨论了职前教师参与共同设计活动如何影响他们的ICT教学创新的影响。对实践或政策的启示联合设计活动有助于职前教师的教学创新。鼓励职前教师在共同设计活动中参与个人思维、集体思维和同伴反馈。
{"title":"Preparing pre-service teachers for instructional innovation with ICT via co-design practice","authors":"Wenli Chen, Zhongling Pi, Jesmine S. H. Tan, Qianru Lyu","doi":"10.14742/ajet.7743","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.7743","url":null,"abstract":"Information and communications technology (ICT) is rapidly changing how we teach and how we learn. ICT can not only act as a teaching and learning aid but also reshape the delivery of instruction and bring about changes in education. Research has largely examined the effects of teacher education programs on their knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs of technology integration and relatively little attention has been paid to their ability to use ICT to innovate instruction. This study examined how pre-teachers engaged in co-design via Google Slides, and how their behavioural characteristics influenced their improvement of instructional innovation with ICT of lesson design. The results of correlation and step regression analyses and lag sequential analysis showed that behaviours of engagement into individual ideation and within-group ideation in co-design activities positively related to the pre-service teachers’ innovations of lesson designs (i.e., usefulness and originality). The clarification type and positive affection type of peer feedback negatively related and predicted their innovations, and the worst-performed group tended to directly copy information from peer feedback. The implications of how pre-service teachers engaging in co-design activities affect their instructional innovations with ICT are discussed.\u0000Implications for practice or policy\u0000\u0000Co-design activities are helpful for instructional innovation for pre-service teachers.\u0000Pre-service teachers are encouraged to engage in individual ideation, group ideation, and peer feedback during co-design activities.\u0000","PeriodicalId":47812,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Journal of Educational Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.1,"publicationDate":"2022-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48170257","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
The influence of teaching motivations on student engagement in an online learning environment in China 中国在线学习环境中教学动机对学生参与的影响
IF 4.1 3区 教育学 Q1 Social Sciences Pub Date : 2022-10-02 DOI: 10.14742/ajet.7280
Qi Li, Qiang Jiang, Jyh‐Chong Liang, X. Pan, Wei Zhao
Given the importance of student engagement for educational success, it is essential to explore how teachers can stimulate student engagement in online learning environment. However, relatively little research drawing from self-determination theory has examined the links between teaching motivations and student engagement. To this end, this study was conducted to survey 414 Chinese college students’ perceptions of teaching motivations, their own intrinsic and extrinsic motivations during the learning process, as well as their engagement with online learning. The findings indicated that the survey had satisfactory validity and internal consistency. Structural equation model revealed the interrelationships between autonomy-supportive teaching motivations, controlling teaching motivations, student intrinsic and extrinsic motivations, and student engagement. The results showed that in online learning environments, autonomy-supportive teaching motivations and student intrinsic motivation were positively related to student engagement. Unexpectedly, controlling teaching motivations and student extrinsic motivation had no significant effect on student engagement. Moreover, the mediating effects of student intrinsic motivation including perceived autonomy, competence, and relatedness offered a deeper understanding of the association between autonomy-supportive teaching motivations and student engagement. The main findings and practical implications together are discussed in depth.Implications for practice or policy:Teachers could adopt autonomy-supportive teaching strategies and stimulate students’ intrinsic motivation as they have shown to be positive factors for student engagement.Developers and educators could enhance student engagement through nurturing inner motivational resources in online learning environment.Researchers could verify more factors that influence student engagement and clarify how they could be manipulated in future studies.
鉴于学生参与对教育成功的重要性,探索教师如何在在线学习环境中激发学生的参与是至关重要的。然而,从自我决定理论出发的研究相对较少,研究了教学动机和学生参与之间的联系。为此,本研究调查了414名中国大学生对教学动机的认知、学习过程中自身的内在动机和外在动机以及在线学习的参与情况。结果表明,本调查具有良好的效度和内部一致性。结构方程模型揭示了自主支持性教学动机、控制性教学动机、学生内在动机和外在动机与学生敬业度之间的相互关系。结果表明,在网络学习环境中,自主支持型教学动机和学生内在动机与学生投入呈正相关。出乎意料的是,控制教学动机和学生外在动机对学生投入没有显著影响。此外,学生内在动机的中介作用,包括感知自主性、能力和相关性,为自主支持教学动机与学生参与之间的关系提供了更深入的理解。本文对研究的主要发现和实际意义进行了深入讨论。对实践或政策的启示:教师可以采用自主支持教学策略,激发学生的内在动机,因为它们已被证明是学生参与的积极因素。开发者和教育者可以通过培养在线学习环境中的内在激励资源来提高学生的参与度。研究人员可以验证更多影响学生参与度的因素,并阐明在未来的研究中如何操纵这些因素。
{"title":"The influence of teaching motivations on student engagement in an online learning environment in China","authors":"Qi Li, Qiang Jiang, Jyh‐Chong Liang, X. Pan, Wei Zhao","doi":"10.14742/ajet.7280","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.7280","url":null,"abstract":"Given the importance of student engagement for educational success, it is essential to explore how teachers can stimulate student engagement in online learning environment. However, relatively little research drawing from self-determination theory has examined the links between teaching motivations and student engagement. To this end, this study was conducted to survey 414 Chinese college students’ perceptions of teaching motivations, their own intrinsic and extrinsic motivations during the learning process, as well as their engagement with online learning. The findings indicated that the survey had satisfactory validity and internal consistency. Structural equation model revealed the interrelationships between autonomy-supportive teaching motivations, controlling teaching motivations, student intrinsic and extrinsic motivations, and student engagement. The results showed that in online learning environments, autonomy-supportive teaching motivations and student intrinsic motivation were positively related to student engagement. Unexpectedly, controlling teaching motivations and student extrinsic motivation had no significant effect on student engagement. Moreover, the mediating effects of student intrinsic motivation including perceived autonomy, competence, and relatedness offered a deeper understanding of the association between autonomy-supportive teaching motivations and student engagement. The main findings and practical implications together are discussed in depth.\u0000Implications for practice or policy:\u0000\u0000Teachers could adopt autonomy-supportive teaching strategies and stimulate students’ intrinsic motivation as they have shown to be positive factors for student engagement.\u0000Developers and educators could enhance student engagement through nurturing inner motivational resources in online learning environment.\u0000Researchers could verify more factors that influence student engagement and clarify how they could be manipulated in future studies.\u0000","PeriodicalId":47812,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Journal of Educational Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.1,"publicationDate":"2022-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42619539","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5
A Developmental Study of Instructional Model for Flipped Learning Process based Online Project-Based Learning(PjBL) 基于在线项目学习(PjBL)的翻转学习过程教学模式发展研究
IF 4.1 3区 教育学 Q1 Social Sciences Pub Date : 2022-09-30 DOI: 10.17232/kset.38.3.907
Ji-hyun Choi, Eunmo Sung
{"title":"A Developmental Study of Instructional Model for Flipped Learning Process based Online Project-Based Learning(PjBL)","authors":"Ji-hyun Choi, Eunmo Sung","doi":"10.17232/kset.38.3.907","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.17232/kset.38.3.907","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":47812,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Journal of Educational Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.1,"publicationDate":"2022-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"89579493","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Exploring the Types and Influencing Factors of Pre-Service Teachers’ Problem Solving Performance 职前教师问题解决绩效的类型及影响因素探讨
IF 4.1 3区 教育学 Q1 Social Sciences Pub Date : 2022-09-30 DOI: 10.17232/kset.38.3.779
Soyoung Shin, Minjeong Kim
{"title":"Exploring the Types and Influencing Factors of Pre-Service Teachers’ Problem Solving Performance","authors":"Soyoung Shin, Minjeong Kim","doi":"10.17232/kset.38.3.779","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.17232/kset.38.3.779","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":47812,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Journal of Educational Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.1,"publicationDate":"2022-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"75824697","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Effects of Retrieval Practice Type and Retention Interval on Mind Wandering, Metacognitive Judgments, and Academic Achievement for Online Classes 检索练习类型和保留时间对网络课堂学生走神、元认知判断和学习成绩的影响
IF 4.1 3区 教育学 Q1 Social Sciences Pub Date : 2022-09-30 DOI: 10.17232/kset.38.3.743
I. Seo, Echeol Kang
{"title":"Effects of Retrieval Practice Type and Retention Interval on Mind Wandering, Metacognitive Judgments, and Academic Achievement for Online Classes","authors":"I. Seo, Echeol Kang","doi":"10.17232/kset.38.3.743","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.17232/kset.38.3.743","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":47812,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Journal of Educational Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.1,"publicationDate":"2022-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"83516188","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Australasian Journal of Educational Technology
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1