For almost seventy years, parties to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) and members of the World Trade Organization (WTO) did not use multilateral dispute resolutionmechanisms to address questions relating to the interpretation of security exceptions.1 The United States—Origin Marking Requirement (Hong Kong, China) (U.S.—Origin Marking Requirement) Panel Report,2 which is the latest addition to the limited but expanding WTO jurisprudence in this area, shows the growing importance of security exceptions in WTO law.3 It is a highly politicized dispute in which the separate customs territory of Hong Kong, China invoked the multilateral dispute mechanism of the WTO for the second time since it joined the WTO as a founding member in 1995 and since it became a contracting party to the 1947 GATT in 1986. Notably, theU.S.—Origin Marking Requirement ruling is the only panel report issued in proceedings with Hong Kong as the disputing party.4 Against the backdrop of the U.S.-China trade war, this important decision tests the limits of the WTO’s architecture and has implications for its future relevance. The origins of the dispute can be traced to July 14, 2020, when President Donald J. Trump issued the Executive Order on Hong Kong Normalization. Following a determination that Hong Kong was no longer sufficiently autonomous to justify differential treatment in relation to China, this executive order suspended the application of Section 201(a) of the United States-Hong Kong Policy Act of 1992, which had previously granted Hong Kong special
{"title":"United States—Origin Marking Requirement, WT/DS597/R","authors":"J. Chaisse, Kehinde Folake Olaoye","doi":"10.1017/ajil.2023.29","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/ajil.2023.29","url":null,"abstract":"For almost seventy years, parties to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) and members of the World Trade Organization (WTO) did not use multilateral dispute resolutionmechanisms to address questions relating to the interpretation of security exceptions.1 The United States—Origin Marking Requirement (Hong Kong, China) (U.S.—Origin Marking Requirement) Panel Report,2 which is the latest addition to the limited but expanding WTO jurisprudence in this area, shows the growing importance of security exceptions in WTO law.3 It is a highly politicized dispute in which the separate customs territory of Hong Kong, China invoked the multilateral dispute mechanism of the WTO for the second time since it joined the WTO as a founding member in 1995 and since it became a contracting party to the 1947 GATT in 1986. Notably, theU.S.—Origin Marking Requirement ruling is the only panel report issued in proceedings with Hong Kong as the disputing party.4 Against the backdrop of the U.S.-China trade war, this important decision tests the limits of the WTO’s architecture and has implications for its future relevance. The origins of the dispute can be traced to July 14, 2020, when President Donald J. Trump issued the Executive Order on Hong Kong Normalization. Following a determination that Hong Kong was no longer sufficiently autonomous to justify differential treatment in relation to China, this executive order suspended the application of Section 201(a) of the United States-Hong Kong Policy Act of 1992, which had previously granted Hong Kong special","PeriodicalId":47841,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of International Law","volume":"117 1","pages":"488 - 493"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46341959","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Kees Bastmeijer, Akiho Shibata, Imme Steinhage, L. Ferrada, Evan T. Bloom
In the 2022-2023 season, more than 104,000 tourists visited Antarctica. This represents an increase of more than 40 percent compared to the 2019-20 pre-pandemic season. The diversity of activities is also constantly growing. This note provides an overview of these developments and discusses the extent to which the Antarctic Treaty Consultative Parties, that govern Antarctica on the basis of consensus, have responded with regulatory action. The analysis shows that little decision-making has taken place and that no consensus could be reached on many policy questions in relation to growing Antarctic tourism. Failure to ensure timely and adequate international responses to environmental challenges poses not only a risk to the Antarctic environment, but could also constitute a challenge to the legitimacy and stability of the Antarctic Treaty governance system. In this light, options are identified for strengthening Antarctic decision-making regarding Antarctic tourism.
{"title":"Regulating Antarctic Tourism: The Challenge of Consensus-Based Decision-Making","authors":"Kees Bastmeijer, Akiho Shibata, Imme Steinhage, L. Ferrada, Evan T. Bloom","doi":"10.1017/ajil.2023.34","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/ajil.2023.34","url":null,"abstract":"In the 2022-2023 season, more than 104,000 tourists visited Antarctica. This represents an increase of more than 40 percent compared to the 2019-20 pre-pandemic season. The diversity of activities is also constantly growing. This note provides an overview of these developments and discusses the extent to which the Antarctic Treaty Consultative Parties, that govern Antarctica on the basis of consensus, have responded with regulatory action. The analysis shows that little decision-making has taken place and that no consensus could be reached on many policy questions in relation to growing Antarctic tourism. Failure to ensure timely and adequate international responses to environmental challenges poses not only a risk to the Antarctic environment, but could also constitute a challenge to the legitimacy and stability of the Antarctic Treaty governance system. In this light, options are identified for strengthening Antarctic decision-making regarding Antarctic tourism.","PeriodicalId":47841,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of International Law","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3,"publicationDate":"2023-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41624484","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Abstract The 1918 Soviet default is the longest and most complex sovereign debt dispute in history. The first settlement with a major Western power came with the United Kingdom in 1986. It followed a settlement almost twenty years earlier for claims arising from the Soviet annexation of the Baltic states. We show how the two negotiations became intertwined and prompted both states to take pragmatic positions on international law. Whereas the Soviet Union showed little interest in legally justifying its inconsistent positions on debt succession, the United Kingdom developed contested legal arguments on state recognition to justify using gold belonging to the Baltic States to settle Soviet claims. In addition, we document how UK government lawyers admitted internally that Britain's involvement in the Russian Civil War had been illegal, which in turn justified very limited compensation to British claimants.
{"title":"Settling Russia's Imperial and Baltic Debts","authors":"E. Denza, L. Poulsen","doi":"10.1017/ajil.2023.23","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/ajil.2023.23","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The 1918 Soviet default is the longest and most complex sovereign debt dispute in history. The first settlement with a major Western power came with the United Kingdom in 1986. It followed a settlement almost twenty years earlier for claims arising from the Soviet annexation of the Baltic states. We show how the two negotiations became intertwined and prompted both states to take pragmatic positions on international law. Whereas the Soviet Union showed little interest in legally justifying its inconsistent positions on debt succession, the United Kingdom developed contested legal arguments on state recognition to justify using gold belonging to the Baltic States to settle Soviet claims. In addition, we document how UK government lawyers admitted internally that Britain's involvement in the Russian Civil War had been illegal, which in turn justified very limited compensation to British claimants.","PeriodicalId":47841,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of International Law","volume":"117 1","pages":"441 - 480"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3,"publicationDate":"2023-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46954746","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Turkey – Certain Measures Concerning the Production, Importation and Marketing of Pharmaceutical Products, WT/DS583/ARB25.","authors":"Weihuan Zhou","doi":"10.1017/ajil.2023.10","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/ajil.2023.10","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":47841,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of International Law","volume":"117 1","pages":"322 - 329"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45804899","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
sometimes nicely tucked away in a footnote— the reader should not be daunted by the book’s size nor shy away from reading it cover to cover. She will then discover that the book is a veritable trove of intellectual pleasure, full of ideas and written in a remarkably accessible style. She will also discover, and maybe deplore, that aside from the brief introduction and conclusion, and altogether very rare discursive interventions in between, Koskenniemi gives relatively little guidance in terms of making explicit connections between the authors, the ideas, the Chapters, and the Parts. He leaves the reader to think for herself. In doing so, he has issued an open invitation for further research and reflection on some grand topics that spring to mind, such as the genealogies of ideas, the comparison of national or regional approaches, the transnational debates between scholars from different countries, the role of shared ideas and values in international networks of diplomats and economic elites, and most ambitiously, a global approach to constitutional history. With this book, Koskenniemi has pioneered an integrated constitutional history of international order. He has set a high bar for those who want to follow on this path, but he has also offered strong foundations to build on.
{"title":"Animals in International Law. By Anne Peters. The Hague, Netherlands: Brill|Nijhoff, 2021. P. 641. Index.","authors":"W. Scholtz","doi":"10.1017/ajil.2023.3","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/ajil.2023.3","url":null,"abstract":"sometimes nicely tucked away in a footnote— the reader should not be daunted by the book’s size nor shy away from reading it cover to cover. She will then discover that the book is a veritable trove of intellectual pleasure, full of ideas and written in a remarkably accessible style. She will also discover, and maybe deplore, that aside from the brief introduction and conclusion, and altogether very rare discursive interventions in between, Koskenniemi gives relatively little guidance in terms of making explicit connections between the authors, the ideas, the Chapters, and the Parts. He leaves the reader to think for herself. In doing so, he has issued an open invitation for further research and reflection on some grand topics that spring to mind, such as the genealogies of ideas, the comparison of national or regional approaches, the transnational debates between scholars from different countries, the role of shared ideas and values in international networks of diplomats and economic elites, and most ambitiously, a global approach to constitutional history. With this book, Koskenniemi has pioneered an integrated constitutional history of international order. He has set a high bar for those who want to follow on this path, but he has also offered strong foundations to build on.","PeriodicalId":47841,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of International Law","volume":"117 1","pages":"386 - 391"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42190727","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
• The United States Agrees to Loss and Damage Fund at COP27 • The Treasury Department Implements Security Council Resolution Establishing a Humanitarian Carveout for UN Sanctions • President Biden Issues Executive Order on Ensuring Robust Consideration of Evolving National Security Risks by the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States • The United States and the European Union Begin Implementation of the European Union-U.S. Data Privacy Framework • The Department of Defense Issues Civilian Harm Mitigation and Response Action Plan • The Justice for Victims of War Crimes Act
{"title":"The United States Agrees to Loss and Damage Fund at COP27","authors":"","doi":"10.1017/ajil.2023.13","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/ajil.2023.13","url":null,"abstract":"• The United States Agrees to Loss and Damage Fund at COP27 • The Treasury Department Implements Security Council Resolution Establishing a Humanitarian Carveout for UN Sanctions • President Biden Issues Executive Order on Ensuring Robust Consideration of Evolving National Security Risks by the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States • The United States and the European Union Begin Implementation of the European Union-U.S. Data Privacy Framework • The Department of Defense Issues Civilian Harm Mitigation and Response Action Plan • The Justice for Victims of War Crimes Act","PeriodicalId":47841,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of International Law","volume":"117 1","pages":"330 - 335"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42209031","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
“highlights CFIUS’s increasing attention to national security risks in several key areas and sharpens the Committee’s focus on protecting America’s national security, while maintaining the U.S. open investment policy.”48 Together with the new enforcement and penalty guidelines, the order, according to the White House, “send[s] a very clear message, a public message, to the private sector . . . about what are some factors that we as an administration are very focused on.”49 It also sends a message to “the public as a whole, as well as foreign governments, allies, and partners around the world.”50 Part of a broader set of actions, the order “explicitly ties CFIUS’s role, actions, and capabilities with the Administration’s overall national security priorities.”51 It is a part, as well, of a transnational proliferation of heightened investment screening.52
{"title":"The United States and the European Union Begin Implementation of the European Union-U.S. Data Privacy Framework","authors":"Janet L. Yellen","doi":"10.1017/ajil.2023.17","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/ajil.2023.17","url":null,"abstract":"“highlights CFIUS’s increasing attention to national security risks in several key areas and sharpens the Committee’s focus on protecting America’s national security, while maintaining the U.S. open investment policy.”48 Together with the new enforcement and penalty guidelines, the order, according to the White House, “send[s] a very clear message, a public message, to the private sector . . . about what are some factors that we as an administration are very focused on.”49 It also sends a message to “the public as a whole, as well as foreign governments, allies, and partners around the world.”50 Part of a broader set of actions, the order “explicitly ties CFIUS’s role, actions, and capabilities with the Administration’s overall national security priorities.”51 It is a part, as well, of a transnational proliferation of heightened investment screening.52","PeriodicalId":47841,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of International Law","volume":"117 1","pages":"346 - 352"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41452902","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Statelessness: A Modern History. By Mira L. Siegelberg. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2020. Pp. 235. Index.","authors":"M. Stewart","doi":"10.1017/ajil.2022.74","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/ajil.2022.74","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":47841,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of International Law","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43457353","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"AJI volume 117 issue 2 Cover and Back matter","authors":"","doi":"10.1017/ajil.2023.20","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/ajil.2023.20","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":47841,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of International Law","volume":"117 1","pages":"b1 - b18"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41981443","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"The UN Security Council and International Law. By Michael Wood and Eran Sthoeger. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. 2022. Pp. xx, 213. Index.","authors":"V. Lowe","doi":"10.1017/ajil.2023.2","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/ajil.2023.2","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":47841,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of International Law","volume":"117 1","pages":"392 - 395"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46448702","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：