Head & Neck Pathology最新文献

Purpose: Accuracy in the diagnosis of HPV-associated oropharyngeal carcinoma (OPSCC) of a rapid, low-cost lateral flow immunochromatographic assay for detecting E6 oncoprotein of HPV-16 and HPV-18 was previously evaluated in a small pilot study. This cross-sectional study aimed to assess on a large case series the sensitivity and specificity of E6 oncoprotein as a diagnostic marker for HPV-associated carcinogenesis in OPSCC.

Methods: 137 consecutive patients with histologically confirmed OPSCC were enrolled in two hospitals in Northeast Italy. HPV status was determined by PCR for HPV DNA and p16^INK4a immunohistochemistry on primary tumor biopsies. An OPSCC was defined as HPV-associated when double positive for high-risk HPV-DNA and p16^INK4a overexpression in primary lesion. Cytological samples from primary tumors and metastatic lymph nodes were obtained and tested for HPV16/18 E6 oncoproteins using the lateral flow immunochromatographic assay, which requires between 90 and 120 min to provide a result. Diagnostic performances were calculated as percentage with confidence intervals (CI).

Results: Of the 137 OPSCC cases, 68 (49.6%) were HPV-associated, testing positive for both high-risk HPV-DNA and p16^INK4a, with HPV16 predominating (82.4%). An average waiting time of 22 days was observed to obtain the results of p16^INK4a and HPV-DNA after primary lesions biopsy. In patients with HPV16/18-associated OPSCC, the HPV16/18 E6 oncoprotein was detected in 59 out of 60 cytological samples from the primary lesion (sensitivity: 98.3%; 95% CI: 91.1-100%) and in 45 out of 51 cytological samples from lymph node metastases (sensitivity: 88.2%; 95% CI: 76.1-95.6%). The E6 oncoprotein assay showed a specificity of 100% in both primary tumors and lymph node metastases.

Conclusion: The low-cost lateral flow immunochromatographic assay for detecting HPV16/18 E6 oncoproteins confirmed high accuracy for identifying HPV-associated OPSCC, particularly in primary tumors, suggesting its potential as a valuable diagnostic tool in clinical practice. Its rapid diagnostic capability could significantly accelerate the process of treatment decision-making, enhancing the timely management of patients.

Aim: To characterize the immunohistochemical expression of MDM2, Bcl-2, SATB2 and Ki-67 in histological variants of unicystic ameloblastoma (UA).

Methodology: Following the ethical approval, forty (40) patients with unicystic ameloblastoma were retrieved from the archives and subjected to immunohistochemistry (IHC). Sociodemographic and clinical data were also retrieved. The results were entered into a Microsoft Excel spreadsheet and analyzed using SPSS software.

Results: Human tooth germs, which served as the control, showed moderate expression of Bcl-2 and MDM2 with slight proliferative activity in ameloblasts and moderate expression of SATB2 in ectomesenchyme and odontoblasts. Luminal UA (Type 1) showed low Ki-67 index and negative to mild Bcl-2 and MDM2 expression, whilst Type 1.2 (luminal and intraluminal), Type 1.2.3 (luminal, intraluminal and mural), and Type 1.3 (luminal and mural), including the recurrent cases, showed moderate to intense expression with high mean Ki-67 index. The difference between the study groups was statistically significant (p value < 0.001). No expression of SATB2 was noted in any histological variant of UA. Furthermore, no significant differences were noted in age, gender, site and location between the groups.

Conclusion: In contrast to luminal variant of UA, mural±intraluminal variants and recurrent cases demonstrate higher expression of Bcl-2 and MDM2 with higher mean Ki-67 index. It may thus be prudent to provide aggressive treatment for cases, not just with mural follicles but also for the patients with intraluminal plexiform proliferation, to prevent recurrence and improve patient outcomes.

Our goal for medicine is to make zero mistakes, yet the reality is that mistakes are an unfortunate part of medical practice. And when it comes to surgical pathology, it is a special case where the diagnostic "bottom line" is provided starkly and directly for all to see in the final diagnosis of the pathology report. When this diagnosis is wrong, particularly when it has serious adverse consequences for the patient, the resulting physical, mental, and emotional effects on patient, provider, pathologist, and health care system can be extremely serious. Head and neck surgical pathology, based on large second review-type studies, is a subspecialty area with average rates of major diagnostic error, but with potential for severely negative impacts on patients. Studies have shown between 1% and 7% major error rates for head and neck practice. How then, as the pathologist, can we react to and manage things when we have made a serious diagnostic mistake? Through personal experience over more than two decades, the hard-won answer is through extreme ownership and a focus on the needs of the patients, who, in the words of William J. Mayo, should have their "needs come first". The emotional impact on us as pathologists and on the clinicians we work with should also be acknowledged and managed. This article will serve as a thorough and open examination of these mistake scenarios and, focusing specifically on diagnostic errors, serve as a practical guide for what you can do, moving forward, to "make things right" to the best of your ability.

Context: Myoepithelial carcinoma (MECA) represents < 1% percent of salivary gland (SG) tumors with a mean age of 55 years. These tumors can arise de novo or in association with pre-existing pleomorphic Adenoma (PA). The cytologic features of MECA overlap with other SG neoplasms including the more common benign entities like PA and myoepithelioma and can pose a diagnostic challenge.

Design: A database search for MECA was performed spanning 10 years. 3 cases qualified with available cyto-histologic correlation. All were morphologically MECA with one case diagnosed as MECA ex-PA. The cases were subjected to a comprehensive immunohistochemical and molecular evaluation (Case#1 has been previously reported and published in head and neck pathology in 2021).

Results: A comparative analysis of these cases is presented in Table 1. All three cases were initially diagnosed as PA on cytology. On review of cytology slides, presence of metachromatic stromal fragments and bland myoepithelial cells was found to be the most common diagnostic pitfall. S100 was positive in all cases while myosin, p63, and GFAP were variably positive. Molecular analysis revealed novel, previously undescribed mutations in the three cases. Additionally, two of three cases expressed PD-L1, suggesting a role for immunotherapy in treatment.

Conclusions: Cytomorphology of MECA is poorly described in literature and can pose a diagnostic challenge due to overlapping features with salivary gland benign neoplasms. A conclusive diagnosis on cytology is often not possible. However, a high cellularity, predominant oncocytoid/ myoepithelial cell population on smears and cell block, along with a strong clinical and radiologic suspicion for malignant salivary gland tumor, should alert the cytopathologist and help avoid an erroneous benign diagnosis on cytology.

Mast cell sarcoma (MCS) is an extremely rare and aggressive malignancy primarily affecting bones, with limited literature associating it with neuroendocrine marker expression. This report presents a rare case of MCS arising in the maxillary sinus and gingiva. A 74-year-old man presented with a progressively enlarging ulcer on the right-sided upper gingiva. Magnetic resonance imaging revealed a 3.4 cm tumor on the floor of the right maxillary sinus. The patient underwent an inferior maxillectomy and right-sided neck dissection. Microscopically, the tumor consisted of monotonous round cells with oval nuclei, vesicular chromatin, inconspicuous nucleoli, and brisk mitoses. A panel of immunohistochemical stains was initially applied to exclude common sinonasal undifferentiated neoplasms, such as sinonasal undifferentiated carcinoma, melanoma, rhabdomyosarcoma, Ewing sarcoma, and lymphoma. The tumor cells showed patchy staining for INSM1 and synaptophysin, but were negative for AE1/AE3, CAM5.2, p40, chromogranin, S100, HMB45, NKX2.2, desmin, CD45 (LCA), CD3, and CD20, with intact INI1 and BRG1 expression. No specific diagnosis could be rendered based on the staining results, leading to consideration of other rare malignancies. Additional staining revealed positivity for CD117, mast cell tryptase, CD13, CD33, CD43, and CD68, confirming the MCS diagnosis. Molecular testing for KIT mutation was negative. Subsequent bone marrow biopsy demonstrated infiltration of atypical mast cells, which led to a diagnosis of mast cell leukemia. Despite high-dose chemotherapy, the patient died three months after the initial diagnosis. The undifferentiated epithelioid morphology and unusual aberrant neuroendocrine marker expression posed significant diagnostic challenges. The major differential diagnoses were discussed in this report.

Metastases in the oral and maxillofacial region, particularly in soft tissues, are exceedingly rare. Such metastases can present as swelling in older individuals, especially in the tongue and gingiva. Furthermore, colorectal metastases at this site are commonly found in the mandible and gingiva and usually share the same morphology as the primary tumor. Herein, we report the case of a 61-year-old woman with a metastatic nodule in the tongue covered by normal mucosa. The clinical, histopathological, and immunohistochemical findings were essential for the final diagnosis of colorectal metastasis, consistent with adenocarcinoma with mucinous differentiation and intestinal phenotype. Metastases of colorectal adenocarcinoma to the tongue are rare but should be included in the differential diagnosis of nodular lesions at this site. The diagnosis can therefore be made based on meticulous clinical and histopathological examination complemented by immunohistochemistry.

Purpose: Radiation therapy is a treatment modality for various ocular and ocular adnexal tumors. The histopathology of chronic radiation dermatitis has been well-described. The authors present two cases demonstrating and characterizing "chronic radiation conjunctivitis" which has not been histopathologically illustrated in detail.

Methods: Retrospective case review of two patients who received proton beam irradiation for an anterior uveal melanoma and external beam radiation for conjunctival lymphoma, and developed leukoplakia and/or thickening of the eyelid margin and symblepharon. Hematoxylin and eosin-stained sections of eyelid margin and conjunctival biopsies as well as clinical histories were reviewed.

Results: Conjunctival biopsies in both cases revealed squamous epithelial metaplasia, chronic inflammation and bizarre-appearing stromal cells with hyperchromatic nuclei in a fibrotic/sclerotic stroma, consistent with chronic radiation conjunctivitis. These stromal cells are believed to be the same "radiation fibroblasts" described in chronic radiation dermatitis.

Conclusion: The radiation fibroblast is characteristic for the diagnosis of chronic radiation conjunctivitis, as it is in radiation dermatitis. Features of squamous metaplasia of conjunctival epithelium, keratinization, subepithelial fibrosis/sclerosis and chronic inflammation are frequently found but not specific. A detailed history and other ancillary tests help differentiate cicatrizing conjunctival conditions, and biopsy should be performed in the setting of suspicion for a secondary malignancy.

Purpose: Mesenchymal neoplasms composed of vascular, smooth muscle, and adipocytic components are uncommon in the nasal cavity. While angioleiomyoma (AL) is a smooth muscle tumor in the Head & Neck WHO classification, it is considered of pericytic origin in the Skin as well as Soft Tissue and Bone classifications. For nasal AL with an adipocytic component, the terms AL with adipocytic differentiation and angiomyolipoma (AML) have been applied, among others. AML is a type of perivascular epithelioid cell tumor (PEComa), most often arising in the kidney, sometimes associated with the tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC). It is uncertain whether nasal cavity AML and AL are best considered hamartomas or neoplasms, as their genetics are largely unexplored.

Methods: We performed a multi-institutional retrospective study of nasal cavity mesenchymal lesions. Patient demographics, clinical histories, and histologic and immunohistochemical findings were collected. DNA and RNA were extracted from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue and analyzed by SNP-based chromosomal microarray, targeted RNA fusion sequencing, and whole-exome sequencing.

Results: Fifteen lesions (3-42 mm) were identified, predominantly in male (87%) patients with a median age of 60. Patients typically presented with obstructive symptoms, and none had a history of TSC. One AL was a recurrence from six years prior; 11 cases showed no recurrence (median 4.7 years, range: 0.88-12.4). Morphologically, 11 AML contained 30-80% smooth muscle, 10-25% vasculature, and 2-60% adipose tissue, while four AL contained 70-80% smooth muscle and 20-30% vasculature. Other histologic observations included ulceration, thrombosis, inflammation, myxoid change, senescent nuclei, and extramedullary hematopoiesis; no well-developed epithelioid cell morphology was identified. Immunohistochemically, all cases were positive for smooth muscle markers (actin, desmin, and/or caldesmon) and negative for melanocytic markers. Molecular analysis revealed loss of 3p and 11q in a single AML. No other known pathogenic copy number or molecular alterations were seen, including in TSC1/2, TFE3, or NOTCH2.

Conclusion: Nasal cavity AML lacks morphologic, immunophenotypic, and genetic features of PEComa family AML. The significant histologic overlap between nasal AML and AL without distinguishing molecular features in either entity suggests "sinonasal angioleiomyoma with adipocytic differentiation" may be the most appropriate terminology for hybrid vascular and smooth muscle lesions containing adipocytic components.