European Eating Disorders Review最新文献

Avoidant Restrictive Food Intake Disorder (ARFID) was first included as a diagnostic category in 2013, and over the past 10 years has been adopted by the international eating disorder community. While greater awareness of these difficulties has increased identification, demand and enabled advocacy for clinical services, the heterogeneous nature of ARFID poses unique challenges for eating disorder clinicians and researchers. This commentary aims to reflect on some of these challenges, focussing specifically on the risk of viewing ARFID through an eating disorder lens. This includes potential biases in the literature as most recent research has been conducted in specialist child and adolescent eating disorder clinic settings, bringing in to question the generalisability of findings to the broad spectrum of individuals affected by ARFID. We also consider whether viewing ARFID predominantly through an eating disorder lens risks us as a field being blinkered to the range of effective skills our multi-disciplinary feeding colleagues may bring. There are opportunities that may come with the eating disorder field navigating treatment pathways for ARFID, including more joined up working with multi-disciplinary colleagues, the ability to transfer skills used in ARFID treatment to individuals with eating disorder presentations, and most notably an opportunity to provide more effective treatment and service pathways for individuals with ARFID and their families. However, these opportunities will only be realised if eating disorder clinicians and researchers step out of their current silos.

Withdrawal: The above article, published online on 28 February 2002 on Wiley Online Library (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/erv.461) has been withdrawn by agreement between the author Anu Raevuori, the Editor-in-Chief, Beate Herpertz-Dahlmann, the Eating Disorders Association, and John Wiley & Sons Ltd. The withdrawal has been agreed due to concerns over violation of the privacy of a research subject.

The objectives of this study were (a) to explore the preliminary cross-cultural validity of a visual-perceptual method to assess body image; (b) to examine potential differences and similarities in body image phenomena between women from two Western countries (i.e., Canada and Spain). 201 self-identified women participated in this cross-sectional study. Ideal, normal, and self-perceived body sizes were assessed using a visual-perceptual method, whereas body dissatisfaction was measured using both a visual-perceptual method and a questionnaire. Visual-perceptual body dissatisfaction was significantly correlated with questionnaire body dissatisfaction, suggesting a preliminary convergent validity between the two assessment methods. Women in both countries were dissatisfied with their bodies. Compared to their self-perceived body, all women chose a significantly thinner visual representation of their “normal” and ideal body. These results may suggest a shift towards the “thin” body as not only ideal, but also normative. This study provides the first evidence for the cross-cultural validity of a visual-perceptual body image assessment tool. The results of the current study confirm the presence of “normative discontent”, and suggest more cross-country similarities than differences among women from these two Western societies.

Haas, V., Nadler, J., Crosby, R. D., Madden, S., Kohn, M., L Grange, D., Gonçalves, A. S. O., Hebebrand, J., & Correll, C. U. (2022). Comparing randomized controlled trials of outpatient family-based or inpatient multimodal treatment followed by outpatient care in youth with anorexia nervosa: Differences in populations, metrics, and outcomes. European Eating Disorders Review, 30(6), 693–705. https://doi.org/10.1002/erv.2907

Funding details in the Acknowledgements section was incomplete. It should have been:

Background: Eating disorders (ED) are serious mental illnesses affecting young adults (YA). Parent-supported treatment for this age cohort is an important consideration given the unique developmental needs and norms of familial social support, but more research is needed to understand parental perceptions of treatment involvement.

Methods: 33 parent-supports of YA with ED completed self-report assessments at admission and discharge of participation in brief, intensive, young-adult focused eating disorder treatment. Assessments measured programme satisfaction, parental self-efficacy, and parent and YA report of eating disorder-related psychopathology. Repeated measures ANOVAs were used to examine pre-post outcome differences and between group differences among parent-supports and their YA (i.e., the patients) on eating disorder psychopathology, clinical impairment, and family functioning using the EDEQ/P-EDEQ Global, P-CIA/CIA, and Family Assessment Device Family Functioning scales. Group differences across time points were examined with paired sample t-tests adjusted for multiple comparisons. Changes in parental self-efficacy were examined separately using two-tailed paired sample t-tests.

Results: Parents reported high acceptability and learning, improvements in self-efficacy, and significant reductions of YA psychopathology at post-treatment. Parents reported comparable reductions in ED psychopathology post-treatment, but significantly greater reductions in clinical impairment compared to YA. Measures of family functioning did not improve for either parent or YA at post-treatment.

Conclusion: Results from this study suggest that parental involvement in a YA programme is feasible and acceptable from a parental perspective and improves parental self-efficacy.