Pub Date : 2023-11-03DOI: 10.1080/02673037.2023.2200236
Mary-Kay Bachour
AbstractService providers’ crucial roles in securing housing for refugees in Canada is a topic scantly addressed in the broader literature. A focus on frontline workers in the housing and settlement sectors offers a productive analytic lens to map the critical link between service provision and housing access for refugees. Based on thirteen semi-structured interviews with service providers across nine organizations in Toronto, Canada, this study illuminates housing access barriers, such as lack of affordable housing and perceived housing discrimination. Furthermore, this paper unearths the intersectional praxis of frontline workers. Broadening the analytical frame to include an intersectional lens centring race, class, immigration status, and gender, this paper enriches current scholarship on 1) housing inequality, 2) refugee settlement, and 3) intersectionality. This paper also makes an epistemic intervention in the evolving field of housing studies at critical junctures. While this research was conducted prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, this study reflects on the added complexity of the pandemic to refugees’ housing access.Keywords: Housing inequalityintersectionalityaffordable housingrefugeessettlementsocial service provision AcknowledgmentThank you to all of the service providers who participated in this project. Your knowledge, experience, and insights made this paper possible.A special thank you to my post-doctoral supervisor, Dr. Marieme Lo, for reading several drafts of this paper. Your insights and support throughout the years were integral to the completion of this paper. I would also like to thank my PhD supervisor, Dr. Rachel Silvey, and the entire dissertation committee for supporting this work. Lastly, a big thank you to all of my family and friends, including Sumaya, Thom, Killian, Ashley, and many more, for all of your support, edits, and encouragement.In addition, I would like to thank the reviewers of this paper for their valuable comments.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author.Notes1 These statistics are non-inclusive of the recent displacement of Ukrainian refugees resulting from the current Russian invasion.2 Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada (IRCC) is the federal governing body that develops and regulates policies related to immigration in Canada.3 There are different admission categories and classes to immigrate to Canada. These categories include economic immigrant, family-sponsored, and refugees. There are also different categories of refugees, which include government-assisted refugees (GARs), privately sponsored refugees (PSR), blended visa office-referred program (BVOR), and refugee claimants. GARs, PSRs and BVORs, are considered resettled refugees and are designated refugees prior to arrival to Canada. Refugee claimants are those who make a refugee claim, while living or arriving in Canada.4 Frontline staff were contacted via e-mail from a list of organizations avail
Regent Park是多伦多市中心的一个社区,由多伦多社区住房公司(TCHC)管理的公共住房项目组成过度拥挤的住房也会对健康产生负面影响,特别是在大流行期间,在感染COVID-19时进行自我隔离非常重要。然而,对于低收入者来说,多户家庭住在一个单位有时是唯一可行的选择在安大略省,房东在法律上可以要求担保人。这个人同意在租约上的房客没有支付租金和/或在租约约定的日期之前搬走的情况下支付租金难民申请人和寻求庇护者将在本文中交替使用。作者简介:mary - kay BachourDr。Mary-Kay Bachour是多伦多大学妇女与性别研究所的博士后,她在那里调查了大多伦多地区(GTA)种族化难民妇女的住所和住房经历。bacour博士在多伦多大学获得地理和规划博士学位以及妇女和性别研究硕士学位。她的研究兴趣包括难民和移民研究、女权主义地理学、跨国和反种族主义女权主义、批判性城市研究、服务提供、住房获取、住房危机、公平和正义。
{"title":"Can Canada become home without a house? The intersectional challenges to housing and settlement among refugees","authors":"Mary-Kay Bachour","doi":"10.1080/02673037.2023.2200236","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02673037.2023.2200236","url":null,"abstract":"AbstractService providers’ crucial roles in securing housing for refugees in Canada is a topic scantly addressed in the broader literature. A focus on frontline workers in the housing and settlement sectors offers a productive analytic lens to map the critical link between service provision and housing access for refugees. Based on thirteen semi-structured interviews with service providers across nine organizations in Toronto, Canada, this study illuminates housing access barriers, such as lack of affordable housing and perceived housing discrimination. Furthermore, this paper unearths the intersectional praxis of frontline workers. Broadening the analytical frame to include an intersectional lens centring race, class, immigration status, and gender, this paper enriches current scholarship on 1) housing inequality, 2) refugee settlement, and 3) intersectionality. This paper also makes an epistemic intervention in the evolving field of housing studies at critical junctures. While this research was conducted prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, this study reflects on the added complexity of the pandemic to refugees’ housing access.Keywords: Housing inequalityintersectionalityaffordable housingrefugeessettlementsocial service provision AcknowledgmentThank you to all of the service providers who participated in this project. Your knowledge, experience, and insights made this paper possible.A special thank you to my post-doctoral supervisor, Dr. Marieme Lo, for reading several drafts of this paper. Your insights and support throughout the years were integral to the completion of this paper. I would also like to thank my PhD supervisor, Dr. Rachel Silvey, and the entire dissertation committee for supporting this work. Lastly, a big thank you to all of my family and friends, including Sumaya, Thom, Killian, Ashley, and many more, for all of your support, edits, and encouragement.In addition, I would like to thank the reviewers of this paper for their valuable comments.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author.Notes1 These statistics are non-inclusive of the recent displacement of Ukrainian refugees resulting from the current Russian invasion.2 Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada (IRCC) is the federal governing body that develops and regulates policies related to immigration in Canada.3 There are different admission categories and classes to immigrate to Canada. These categories include economic immigrant, family-sponsored, and refugees. There are also different categories of refugees, which include government-assisted refugees (GARs), privately sponsored refugees (PSR), blended visa office-referred program (BVOR), and refugee claimants. GARs, PSRs and BVORs, are considered resettled refugees and are designated refugees prior to arrival to Canada. Refugee claimants are those who make a refugee claim, while living or arriving in Canada.4 Frontline staff were contacted via e-mail from a list of organizations avail","PeriodicalId":48138,"journal":{"name":"HOUSING STUDIES","volume":"42 7","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135867944","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-11-02DOI: 10.1080/02673037.2023.2269114
Katriina Rosengren, Jarkko Rasinkangas, Hannu Ruonavaara
Segregation is a relatively recent issue in larger Finnish cities. The existence of segregation contradicts the Nordic welfare model, and segregation has been raised to the national policy level in Finland to combat a slowly widening gap between social groups on a spatial level. Local municipalities are central actors in urban policies. Therefore, we look at segregation from a local policy perspective. Our results confirm that segregation has not been seen as a burning issue in Finland on a local level, and recognition depends on the size of the city. Where segregation is acknowledged, it is often named a problem in city strategies but does not translate into anti-segregation policies locally. In mid-size cities, ‘spatial deprivation’ rather than segregation is acknowledged, rendering systematic interventions aimed at segregation even more difficult.
{"title":"Awareness of segregation in a welfare state: a Finnish local policy perspective","authors":"Katriina Rosengren, Jarkko Rasinkangas, Hannu Ruonavaara","doi":"10.1080/02673037.2023.2269114","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02673037.2023.2269114","url":null,"abstract":"Segregation is a relatively recent issue in larger Finnish cities. The existence of segregation contradicts the Nordic welfare model, and segregation has been raised to the national policy level in Finland to combat a slowly widening gap between social groups on a spatial level. Local municipalities are central actors in urban policies. Therefore, we look at segregation from a local policy perspective. Our results confirm that segregation has not been seen as a burning issue in Finland on a local level, and recognition depends on the size of the city. Where segregation is acknowledged, it is often named a problem in city strategies but does not translate into anti-segregation policies locally. In mid-size cities, ‘spatial deprivation’ rather than segregation is acknowledged, rendering systematic interventions aimed at segregation even more difficult.","PeriodicalId":48138,"journal":{"name":"HOUSING STUDIES","volume":"201 4","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135974437","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-11-02DOI: 10.1080/02673037.2023.2274444
Heather Rollwagen, Brennan Mayhew
AbstractThis paper critically examines why young adults characterize themselves as ‘lucky’ when describing their housing experiences, often when those experiences reflect considerable struggle. We explore this narrative as it emerges in conversation with 29 young adults living in Toronto, Canada. Results of the analysis indicate that some young adults employ the narrative of luck to describe structural forms of privilege they experience within the housing system, while others make use of this narrative in ways that reflect their sense of disentitlement to housing. A critical interpretation of these findings suggests that these two narratives, while used by different groups of individuals, both reflect and reinforce a broader discourse of neoliberalism within the housing system. Specifically, our analysis highlights how the narrative of luck obscures structural inequalities that condition access to safe, secure and suitable housing, while simultaneously reinforcing a neoliberal ideology of (dis)entitlement to housing. We conclude our analysis by considering the implications of this narrative for the immediate- and long-term housing struggles of young adults.Keywords: Luckhousing aspirationsyoung adults and housingneoliberal housing systemsentitlement AcknowledgmentsThe authors are grateful for the helpful comments and feedback provided in a preliminary version of this paper, which was presented virtually at the 2020 Housing Studies Association conference, as well as the constructive feedback of the anonymous reviewers. We would also like to acknowledge the research assistance provided by Renée Ferguson and Chelsea James.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 Initial plans had been in place to conduct more interviews; however, due to the COVID-19 pandemic, all interviews ceased in March 2020 when the Canadian government declared a state of emergency. The present analysis reflects the sentiments of young adults in the pre-COVID housing market. Like many urban centres, Toronto’s housing system has seen tremendous instability since this time. While some temporary policy changes were implemented during various waves of the pandemic, such as a temporary ban on evictions, the private rental market and the ownership market remain extremely unaffordabe.Additional informationNotes on contributorsHeather RollwagenHeather Rollwagen is an associate professor in the Sociology Department at Toronto Metropolitan University (formerly Ryerson University). Her research lies at the intersection of housing studies and criminology, exploring questions related to safety, precarity, and urban livability.Brennan MayhewBrennan Mayhew recently completed her Master’s in Urban Planning at the School of Urban Planning at McGill University. Her research spans housing studies and urban design, with a particular focus on topics such as placemaking, housing justice, and food systems.
{"title":"Feeling lucky: young adults, housing struggles, and the neoliberal politics of entitlement","authors":"Heather Rollwagen, Brennan Mayhew","doi":"10.1080/02673037.2023.2274444","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02673037.2023.2274444","url":null,"abstract":"AbstractThis paper critically examines why young adults characterize themselves as ‘lucky’ when describing their housing experiences, often when those experiences reflect considerable struggle. We explore this narrative as it emerges in conversation with 29 young adults living in Toronto, Canada. Results of the analysis indicate that some young adults employ the narrative of luck to describe structural forms of privilege they experience within the housing system, while others make use of this narrative in ways that reflect their sense of disentitlement to housing. A critical interpretation of these findings suggests that these two narratives, while used by different groups of individuals, both reflect and reinforce a broader discourse of neoliberalism within the housing system. Specifically, our analysis highlights how the narrative of luck obscures structural inequalities that condition access to safe, secure and suitable housing, while simultaneously reinforcing a neoliberal ideology of (dis)entitlement to housing. We conclude our analysis by considering the implications of this narrative for the immediate- and long-term housing struggles of young adults.Keywords: Luckhousing aspirationsyoung adults and housingneoliberal housing systemsentitlement AcknowledgmentsThe authors are grateful for the helpful comments and feedback provided in a preliminary version of this paper, which was presented virtually at the 2020 Housing Studies Association conference, as well as the constructive feedback of the anonymous reviewers. We would also like to acknowledge the research assistance provided by Renée Ferguson and Chelsea James.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 Initial plans had been in place to conduct more interviews; however, due to the COVID-19 pandemic, all interviews ceased in March 2020 when the Canadian government declared a state of emergency. The present analysis reflects the sentiments of young adults in the pre-COVID housing market. Like many urban centres, Toronto’s housing system has seen tremendous instability since this time. While some temporary policy changes were implemented during various waves of the pandemic, such as a temporary ban on evictions, the private rental market and the ownership market remain extremely unaffordabe.Additional informationNotes on contributorsHeather RollwagenHeather Rollwagen is an associate professor in the Sociology Department at Toronto Metropolitan University (formerly Ryerson University). Her research lies at the intersection of housing studies and criminology, exploring questions related to safety, precarity, and urban livability.Brennan MayhewBrennan Mayhew recently completed her Master’s in Urban Planning at the School of Urban Planning at McGill University. Her research spans housing studies and urban design, with a particular focus on topics such as placemaking, housing justice, and food systems.","PeriodicalId":48138,"journal":{"name":"HOUSING STUDIES","volume":"184 3","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135974007","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-10-31DOI: 10.1080/02673037.2023.2266401
Alan Morris, Catherine Robinson, Jan Idle
AbstractAlthough tens of thousands of households are on the waiting-list for social housing in Australia, little is known about how they experience waiting for social housing. Drawing on 75 interviews conducted with people on the waiting-list (waitees) in three Australian states, we examine the impact of waiting on waitees utilising the concept of triple precarity. Double precarity refers to the insecure employment and housing that a substantial proportion of low-income households are experiencing in the contemporary period. We argue that waitees experience triple precarity. Not only are waitees unemployed or intermittently employed and suffer from housing stress and insecurity, but they also have to endure endless waiting. This adds another challenging dimension to their already difficult lives. We show that besides the impacts of insecure housing and employment, waiting for social housing contributes to waitees’ dire living circumstances and quality of life, difficulty finding employment and poor health. Waiting for social housing has emotional and material costs.Keywords: Social housingwaiteesendless waitingtriple precarityAustralia Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 In Australia social housing is made up of public and community housing. The former is owned and controlled by state governments whereas community housing is owned and managed by community housing providers which are non-profit organisations.2 Waiting list implies that there is some order in the allocation process and waitees merely have to wait their turn. This is clearly not accurate. There is no clear queue and waitees often have no idea if or when they will access a social housing dwelling. However, we decided to use the more familiar term ‘waiting list’ rather than the less familiar ‘housing register’ which is now the term favoured by state governments in Australia.3 In March 2023 the full government Age Pension for a single person was $532 a week and for couples it was $802. The Disability Support Pension benefit was the same as the Age Pension. The unemployment benefit was much lower—$346 a week. In addition, depending on the rent paid, households reliant mainly on government benefits are entitled to rent assistance. The maximum rent assistance in March 2023 was $78.60 a week for a single person and $74 for couples.4 There were no differences in the way waitees experienced waiting in the respective jurisdictions. Also, whether they were in a regional or metropolitan area did not have an impact. The pervasive scarcity of housing in all three states meant that the waiting experience was similar.5 When interviewed in March 2023, Natasha was still in the same accommodation. The landlord had postponed his demolition plan for the moment.6 Superannuation was introduced in 1992. An employer has to contribute a proportion of an employee’s salary into a ‘super fund’. The fund is supposed to provide for a person’s retirement.7 For
{"title":"Dire consequences: waiting for social housing in three Australian states","authors":"Alan Morris, Catherine Robinson, Jan Idle","doi":"10.1080/02673037.2023.2266401","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02673037.2023.2266401","url":null,"abstract":"AbstractAlthough tens of thousands of households are on the waiting-list for social housing in Australia, little is known about how they experience waiting for social housing. Drawing on 75 interviews conducted with people on the waiting-list (waitees) in three Australian states, we examine the impact of waiting on waitees utilising the concept of triple precarity. Double precarity refers to the insecure employment and housing that a substantial proportion of low-income households are experiencing in the contemporary period. We argue that waitees experience triple precarity. Not only are waitees unemployed or intermittently employed and suffer from housing stress and insecurity, but they also have to endure endless waiting. This adds another challenging dimension to their already difficult lives. We show that besides the impacts of insecure housing and employment, waiting for social housing contributes to waitees’ dire living circumstances and quality of life, difficulty finding employment and poor health. Waiting for social housing has emotional and material costs.Keywords: Social housingwaiteesendless waitingtriple precarityAustralia Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 In Australia social housing is made up of public and community housing. The former is owned and controlled by state governments whereas community housing is owned and managed by community housing providers which are non-profit organisations.2 Waiting list implies that there is some order in the allocation process and waitees merely have to wait their turn. This is clearly not accurate. There is no clear queue and waitees often have no idea if or when they will access a social housing dwelling. However, we decided to use the more familiar term ‘waiting list’ rather than the less familiar ‘housing register’ which is now the term favoured by state governments in Australia.3 In March 2023 the full government Age Pension for a single person was $532 a week and for couples it was $802. The Disability Support Pension benefit was the same as the Age Pension. The unemployment benefit was much lower—$346 a week. In addition, depending on the rent paid, households reliant mainly on government benefits are entitled to rent assistance. The maximum rent assistance in March 2023 was $78.60 a week for a single person and $74 for couples.4 There were no differences in the way waitees experienced waiting in the respective jurisdictions. Also, whether they were in a regional or metropolitan area did not have an impact. The pervasive scarcity of housing in all three states meant that the waiting experience was similar.5 When interviewed in March 2023, Natasha was still in the same accommodation. The landlord had postponed his demolition plan for the moment.6 Superannuation was introduced in 1992. An employer has to contribute a proportion of an employee’s salary into a ‘super fund’. The fund is supposed to provide for a person’s retirement.7 For","PeriodicalId":48138,"journal":{"name":"HOUSING STUDIES","volume":"494 ","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135863633","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-10-26DOI: 10.1080/02673037.2023.2273459
Andrea Sharam
{"title":"Introducing social housing Asset Management as a comprehensive system","authors":"Andrea Sharam","doi":"10.1080/02673037.2023.2273459","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02673037.2023.2273459","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":48138,"journal":{"name":"HOUSING STUDIES","volume":"105 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"134909457","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-10-25DOI: 10.1080/02673037.2023.2272840
Jeremy Lim-Soh, Poh Lin Tan, Nikhitha Mary Mathew
{"title":"Too close for comfort? Impact of pandemic residential environment on women’s life satisfaction and spousal relationships","authors":"Jeremy Lim-Soh, Poh Lin Tan, Nikhitha Mary Mathew","doi":"10.1080/02673037.2023.2272840","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02673037.2023.2272840","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":48138,"journal":{"name":"HOUSING STUDIES","volume":"7 2","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135218741","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-10-18DOI: 10.1080/02673037.2023.2266383
Laura Witte, Jack Tsai, Paula Cuccaro, Andrea Link, Vanessa Cox, Vanessa Schick
AbstractIn the United States, the Low-Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) is the main way that the federal government subsidizes place-based housing for low-income individuals including those with experiences of homelessness. Although these communities are at risk of criminal justice involvement (CJI), the relationship between living in LIHTC housing and CJI remains underexplored. This study analyzed data on a retrospective cohort of LIHTC supportive housing residents to examine changes in CJI after move-in and how residents with CJI and without CJI after move-in differed. Compared to the time period before move-in, arrests, convictions, and time sentenced to confinement decreased significantly after move-in. Age, sex, and more extensive criminal history were significantly associated with CJI after move-in. Using negative binomial regression, increasing time in housing was associated with decreasing arrests, convictions, and time sentenced to confinement after move-in.Keywords: Low-Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC)supportive housinghomelessnesslow-incomecriminal justice involvement AcknowledgementsThe authors would like to thank the leadership, staff, and residents of New Hope Housing, Inc. (NHH) without whom this study would not be possible.Disclosure statementThis research was funded by New Hope Housing, Inc. (NHH). NHH had no input on analysis or reporting of these results. The primary author has disclosed these interests fully to Taylor & Francis and has in place an approved plan for managing any potential conflicts arising from this arrangement. This work was also supported by the Health Professions Education Evaluation and Research (HPEER) fellowship, through the VA Office of Academic Affiliations Advanced Fellowships Program. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the HPEER program or the Department of Veterans Affairs.Additional informationFundingThis research was funded by New Hope Housing, Inc. This work was also supported by Health Professions Education Evaluation and Research fellowship through the VA Office of Academic Affiliations Advanced Fellowships Program (3HPECCD2020).Notes on contributorsLaura WitteLaura Witte, DrPH, MPH is an advanced postdoctoral fellow at the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs in the Health Professions Education Evaluation and Research and the National Center on Homelessness among Veterans fellowships. Her community-based research focuses on the health of veterans, LGBTQ+ communities, and individuals experiencing homelessness and incarceration.Jack TsaiJack Tsai, PhD, MSCP serves as Campus Dean and Professor of Public Health at the UTHealth School of Public Health. He also serves as Research Director for the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) National Center on Homelessness Among Veterans and is an Adjunct Associate Professor of Psychiatry at Yale University School of Medicine. He has received federally funded grants and publishe
{"title":"Changes in criminal justice involvement among renters in Low-Income Housing Tax Credit properties","authors":"Laura Witte, Jack Tsai, Paula Cuccaro, Andrea Link, Vanessa Cox, Vanessa Schick","doi":"10.1080/02673037.2023.2266383","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02673037.2023.2266383","url":null,"abstract":"AbstractIn the United States, the Low-Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) is the main way that the federal government subsidizes place-based housing for low-income individuals including those with experiences of homelessness. Although these communities are at risk of criminal justice involvement (CJI), the relationship between living in LIHTC housing and CJI remains underexplored. This study analyzed data on a retrospective cohort of LIHTC supportive housing residents to examine changes in CJI after move-in and how residents with CJI and without CJI after move-in differed. Compared to the time period before move-in, arrests, convictions, and time sentenced to confinement decreased significantly after move-in. Age, sex, and more extensive criminal history were significantly associated with CJI after move-in. Using negative binomial regression, increasing time in housing was associated with decreasing arrests, convictions, and time sentenced to confinement after move-in.Keywords: Low-Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC)supportive housinghomelessnesslow-incomecriminal justice involvement AcknowledgementsThe authors would like to thank the leadership, staff, and residents of New Hope Housing, Inc. (NHH) without whom this study would not be possible.Disclosure statementThis research was funded by New Hope Housing, Inc. (NHH). NHH had no input on analysis or reporting of these results. The primary author has disclosed these interests fully to Taylor & Francis and has in place an approved plan for managing any potential conflicts arising from this arrangement. This work was also supported by the Health Professions Education Evaluation and Research (HPEER) fellowship, through the VA Office of Academic Affiliations Advanced Fellowships Program. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the HPEER program or the Department of Veterans Affairs.Additional informationFundingThis research was funded by New Hope Housing, Inc. This work was also supported by Health Professions Education Evaluation and Research fellowship through the VA Office of Academic Affiliations Advanced Fellowships Program (3HPECCD2020).Notes on contributorsLaura WitteLaura Witte, DrPH, MPH is an advanced postdoctoral fellow at the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs in the Health Professions Education Evaluation and Research and the National Center on Homelessness among Veterans fellowships. Her community-based research focuses on the health of veterans, LGBTQ+ communities, and individuals experiencing homelessness and incarceration.Jack TsaiJack Tsai, PhD, MSCP serves as Campus Dean and Professor of Public Health at the UTHealth School of Public Health. He also serves as Research Director for the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) National Center on Homelessness Among Veterans and is an Adjunct Associate Professor of Psychiatry at Yale University School of Medicine. He has received federally funded grants and publishe","PeriodicalId":48138,"journal":{"name":"HOUSING STUDIES","volume":"52 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135884739","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-10-18DOI: 10.1080/02673037.2023.2266391
Jinhee Yun, Megan E. Hatch
AbstractHousing insecurity is associated with myriad negative outcomes for individuals and communities. Less understood is the indirect and direct relationships between specific types of housing insecurity and health. Using Swope and Hernández’s (Citation2019) 4C’s of housing insecurity, data from the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent to Adult Health (Add Health), structural equation modelling, and binary logistic regression, we examine the relationship between different types of housing insecurity and mental and general health. We find housing cost independently decreases health outcomes while consistency insecurity indirectly affects health by increasing cost burdens. Most forms of housing cost, consistency, and context insecurity have independent and significant negative associations with short-term (12 month) and medium-term (seven to eight years) mental health. This suggests policymakers and advocates should place greater emphasis on housing assistance as an entitlement and cash assistance that vulnerable populations can use to address the cause of their specific type of housing insecurity.Keywords: Housing insecurityhealthhousing affordabilitycost burdenmental health AcknowledgementsWe thank the reviewers and editors for their helpful comments, which greatly improved this manuscript’s quality. An earlier version of this paper was presented at the 2021 American Society for Public Administration conference.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 The most recent wave (wave V) was not fully released in time for this project.2 The final analytic sample used for this study is a subset of the original wave IV Add Health sample of 15,071 individuals. This sample consists of a total 11,303 respondents who possess non-missing data for all variables in the analysis (to avoid the need for data imputation).3 We do not include contextual variables in wave III in this model because of model stability issues. However, we get substantively similar results when including the context variables in wave III in our models.4 The SEM result without weights is largely similar to that of the analysis with weights, with three exceptions. As we expected, racial minority groups are statistically and significantly more likely to have housing insecurity for the unweighted SEM because Add Health oversampled racial minority parents with higher education (Chen & Chantala, Citation2014; Harris et al., Citation2009). Females are more likely to have a cost burden in wave IV (p < 0.001), and consistency in wave III and earlier has significant negative effects on general health (p < 0.001).Additional informationNotes on contributorsJinhee YunJinhee Yun is an Associate Research Fellow in the Department of Housing Culture Research at AURI (Architecture & Urban Research Institute). Her research focuses on poverty, the consequences of inequality, and the impacts of unequal access to opportunities, particularly on housing, ne
{"title":"Housing cost, consistency, and context and their relationship to health","authors":"Jinhee Yun, Megan E. Hatch","doi":"10.1080/02673037.2023.2266391","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02673037.2023.2266391","url":null,"abstract":"AbstractHousing insecurity is associated with myriad negative outcomes for individuals and communities. Less understood is the indirect and direct relationships between specific types of housing insecurity and health. Using Swope and Hernández’s (Citation2019) 4C’s of housing insecurity, data from the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent to Adult Health (Add Health), structural equation modelling, and binary logistic regression, we examine the relationship between different types of housing insecurity and mental and general health. We find housing cost independently decreases health outcomes while consistency insecurity indirectly affects health by increasing cost burdens. Most forms of housing cost, consistency, and context insecurity have independent and significant negative associations with short-term (12 month) and medium-term (seven to eight years) mental health. This suggests policymakers and advocates should place greater emphasis on housing assistance as an entitlement and cash assistance that vulnerable populations can use to address the cause of their specific type of housing insecurity.Keywords: Housing insecurityhealthhousing affordabilitycost burdenmental health AcknowledgementsWe thank the reviewers and editors for their helpful comments, which greatly improved this manuscript’s quality. An earlier version of this paper was presented at the 2021 American Society for Public Administration conference.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 The most recent wave (wave V) was not fully released in time for this project.2 The final analytic sample used for this study is a subset of the original wave IV Add Health sample of 15,071 individuals. This sample consists of a total 11,303 respondents who possess non-missing data for all variables in the analysis (to avoid the need for data imputation).3 We do not include contextual variables in wave III in this model because of model stability issues. However, we get substantively similar results when including the context variables in wave III in our models.4 The SEM result without weights is largely similar to that of the analysis with weights, with three exceptions. As we expected, racial minority groups are statistically and significantly more likely to have housing insecurity for the unweighted SEM because Add Health oversampled racial minority parents with higher education (Chen & Chantala, Citation2014; Harris et al., Citation2009). Females are more likely to have a cost burden in wave IV (p < 0.001), and consistency in wave III and earlier has significant negative effects on general health (p < 0.001).Additional informationNotes on contributorsJinhee YunJinhee Yun is an Associate Research Fellow in the Department of Housing Culture Research at AURI (Architecture & Urban Research Institute). Her research focuses on poverty, the consequences of inequality, and the impacts of unequal access to opportunities, particularly on housing, ne","PeriodicalId":48138,"journal":{"name":"HOUSING STUDIES","volume":"123 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135883891","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-10-16DOI: 10.1080/02673037.2023.2262949
Michal Synek, Dana Hradcová
AbstractHome is not only a concrete place and a complex system of relations, but also an end-in-view that connects perceived shortcomings in the current versions of home with the desired goals and the means to achieve them. Our case study centres on a dining improvement project which strives to create home in residential institutions for people identified as disabled by serving a ‘home-like meal’. We describe three versions of home that are enacted in residential institutions – home as a commune, home as a private space and home as an intimate sphere – and document how they influence the serving of meals. We combine pragmatic theory of valuation with ethnographic research of home-making practices to assess the feasibility of these ends-in-view in relation to the housing options available to the disabled-identified. We show that when the realization of the chosen goals proves unfeasible under present circumstances, the discrepancies between the desired and actual versions of home can be effaced through various re-contextualization strategies. Of the three versions of home encountered during our intervention/research, the home enacted as an intimate sphere is the one most firmly grounded in clients’ real wishes and needs, and therefore the one most favourable to positive change.Keywords: Residential homeinstitutional diningpragmatic theory of valuation AcknowledgementsThe authors would like to thank Liat Ben-Moshe for convening the Critical Disability Studies Caucus II The home which is not one: Disability and institutional ‘home’ at the American Studies Association’s Annual Meeting in Denver, CO, in 2016, where material used in this article was first presented, and for her stimulating comments. For their comments on previous versions of the article, we would also like to thank Terezie Lokšová and other students of Zdeněk Konopásek’s doctoral seminars at the Centre for Theoretical Study of Charles University and the Czech Academy of Sciences, as well as Jeannette Pols, Walter Lorenz, Kateřina Lišková, Andrea Bělehradová, Lenka Hadarová and the anonymous reviewers of Housing Studies. Last but not least, we would like to express our gratitude to the inhabitants (past and present) and employees of the residential institutions where our research for this article took place.The meal improvement intervention described in the article was realized as part of the ‘Gerontological and organisational supervision’ project, a joint project of the Gerontological Centre, the Faculty of Humanities of Charles University and the Czech Alzheimer Society. It obtained ethical approval from the Ethics Committee of the Gerontological Centre and was implemented with the agreement of the Regional Authority. The Czech Science Foundation’s grant GA ČR 19-07724S/P404, through which the analysis of the data and the publication of the article was supported, obtained ethical approval from the Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Humanities of Charles University.Disclosure statement
摘要:家不仅是一个具体的场所和一个复杂的关系系统,而且是一个最终的视角,它将当前版本的家的缺陷与期望的目标和实现目标的手段联系起来。我们的案例研究集中在一个餐饮改善项目上,该项目致力于通过提供“家一样的饭菜”,为残疾人士在住宿机构中创造家。我们描述了在寄宿机构中形成的三种版本的家——作为公社的家、作为私人空间的家和作为亲密领域的家——并记录了它们如何影响饭菜的供应。我们将实用主义的估价理论与造家实践的人种学研究相结合,以评估这些目标的可行性——考虑到残疾人可获得的住房选择。我们的研究表明,当所选择的目标在当前情况下无法实现时,可以通过各种重新情境化策略来消除期望和实际家庭版本之间的差异。在我们的干预/研究中遇到的三种版本的家中,作为亲密空间的家是最牢固地建立在客户真实愿望和需求基础上的,因此是最有利于积极改变的。作者感谢Liat Ben-Moshe于2016年在科罗拉多州丹丹市举行的美国研究协会年会上召开了“关键残疾研究核心小组II:家不是一个:残疾和机构“家”,本文中使用的材料首次在会上提出,并感谢她的鼓舞人心的评论。我们还要感谢Terezie Lokšová和zden<e:1> Konopásek在查尔斯大学理论研究中心和捷克科学院博士研讨会上的其他学生,以及Jeannette Pols、Walter Lorenz、Kateřina Lišková、Andrea b<e:1> lehradov<e:1>、Lenka hadarov<e:1>和《住房研究》的匿名审稿人。最后但并非最不重要的是,我们要感谢我们为这篇文章进行研究的居住机构的居民(过去和现在)和员工。文章中描述的膳食改善干预是作为“老年学和组织监督”项目的一部分实现的,该项目是老年学中心、查尔斯大学人文学院和捷克阿尔茨海默病协会的联合项目。它获得了老年学中心伦理委员会的伦理批准,并在区域当局的同意下实施。捷克科学基金会资助GA ČR 19-07724S/P404,通过该基金支持数据分析和文章发表,并获得查尔斯大学人文学院伦理委员会的伦理批准。作者无竞争利益需要申报。注1搭配“mental impairment”可能是这个最广泛使用的捷克术语最接近的英语翻译。通过把它加上引号,我们与它的冒犯性用法保持距离,而它的构造过程——我们称之为“标记”——将在文章的第五节中详细讨论自2007年通过新的后社会主义社会服务法(捷克共和国议会,Citation2006)以来,居住在"健康障碍者之家"的人被称为"服务使用者",或更通俗地称为"客户",这反映了新自由主义普遍强调顾客/供应商关系。虽然将我们故事中的主角简单地称为“食客”、“食客”或“居民”可能更准确,但我们坚持使用用户/提供者这两种最广泛使用的术语许多项目参与者认为对座位顺序的干预是改善餐厅氛围的有效方法所有的名字都改了斜体原文。本出版物由捷克科学基金会资助,资助GA ČR 19-07724S/P404“脆弱住宅中的弱势居民:对住宅护理紧张关系的调查”。在丹佛举行的美国研究协会年会上,捷克共和国教育、青年和体育部通过“研究机构长期发展的机构支持”资助了一项试点研究,该资助于2016年授予查尔斯大学人文学院,并于2014年至2018年授予马萨里克大学社会研究学院。文章中描述的膳食改善干预措施是由地区管理局资助的“老年学和组织监督”项目的一部分。 作者简介:michael Synek是一位社会学家和民族志学家。他的研究领域包括:痴呆症患者的护理组织、寄宿机构的膳食供应、残疾人士在“家中”的护理和维护实践,以及最近被诊断为精神障碍的人的生活故事。现任英国查尔斯大学人文学院应用社会科学系高级研究员。他对在科学技术研究、残疾研究和护理研究的交叉领域具有实际影响的理论问题感兴趣。Dana HradcováDana hradcov<e:1>从护理研究和经验伦理学的角度研究被认定为残疾人的相互依赖、残疾和解放。她参与了与残疾生活相关的跨学科研究项目,解决了去机构化和长期护理的挑战。在她对社会和卫生保健工作者以及社会和卫生保健服务管理人员的教学中,她着重于合作学习和行动,通过合作制作、民族志和叙事访谈来探索和发展服务。
{"title":"At home in the ‘home’? Narratives of home in repertoires of institutional dining","authors":"Michal Synek, Dana Hradcová","doi":"10.1080/02673037.2023.2262949","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02673037.2023.2262949","url":null,"abstract":"AbstractHome is not only a concrete place and a complex system of relations, but also an end-in-view that connects perceived shortcomings in the current versions of home with the desired goals and the means to achieve them. Our case study centres on a dining improvement project which strives to create home in residential institutions for people identified as disabled by serving a ‘home-like meal’. We describe three versions of home that are enacted in residential institutions – home as a commune, home as a private space and home as an intimate sphere – and document how they influence the serving of meals. We combine pragmatic theory of valuation with ethnographic research of home-making practices to assess the feasibility of these ends-in-view in relation to the housing options available to the disabled-identified. We show that when the realization of the chosen goals proves unfeasible under present circumstances, the discrepancies between the desired and actual versions of home can be effaced through various re-contextualization strategies. Of the three versions of home encountered during our intervention/research, the home enacted as an intimate sphere is the one most firmly grounded in clients’ real wishes and needs, and therefore the one most favourable to positive change.Keywords: Residential homeinstitutional diningpragmatic theory of valuation AcknowledgementsThe authors would like to thank Liat Ben-Moshe for convening the Critical Disability Studies Caucus II The home which is not one: Disability and institutional ‘home’ at the American Studies Association’s Annual Meeting in Denver, CO, in 2016, where material used in this article was first presented, and for her stimulating comments. For their comments on previous versions of the article, we would also like to thank Terezie Lokšová and other students of Zdeněk Konopásek’s doctoral seminars at the Centre for Theoretical Study of Charles University and the Czech Academy of Sciences, as well as Jeannette Pols, Walter Lorenz, Kateřina Lišková, Andrea Bělehradová, Lenka Hadarová and the anonymous reviewers of Housing Studies. Last but not least, we would like to express our gratitude to the inhabitants (past and present) and employees of the residential institutions where our research for this article took place.The meal improvement intervention described in the article was realized as part of the ‘Gerontological and organisational supervision’ project, a joint project of the Gerontological Centre, the Faculty of Humanities of Charles University and the Czech Alzheimer Society. It obtained ethical approval from the Ethics Committee of the Gerontological Centre and was implemented with the agreement of the Regional Authority. The Czech Science Foundation’s grant GA ČR 19-07724S/P404, through which the analysis of the data and the publication of the article was supported, obtained ethical approval from the Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Humanities of Charles University.Disclosure statement","PeriodicalId":48138,"journal":{"name":"HOUSING STUDIES","volume":"227 5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"136114012","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-10-11DOI: 10.1080/02673037.2023.2266412
Alexandre Flage, Julie Le Gallo
AbstractWe implement correspondence testing to detect and assess the extent of discrimination against people with disabilities in the French rental housing market. By sending 1,750 emails in a matched-pair procedure, we provide evidence of significant and extensive discrimination against blind people with a guide dog, individuals with mental disabilities, and individuals with motor impairments in the process of rented housing allocation. However, the primary cause of discrimination against blind individuals appears to stem from the presence of the guide dog, rather than the disability itself. Our results are also consistent with the presence of statistical discrimination (particularly based on financial means). We find that absolute discrimination against disabled applicants increases in accordance with the level of rent, while real estate agents discriminate significantly less against disabled applicants than private landlords.Keywords: Disabilitydiscriminationtestinghousing marketfield experimentJEL CLASSIFICATION: C93C12J14R21 Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 French law n° 2008-496 of May 27, 2008: ‘Constitutes direct discrimination the situation in which, on the basis of their origin, gender, disability, sexual orientation, etc., one person is treated less favorably than another is, has been or will have been in a comparable situation. Constitutes indirect discrimination a provision, a criterion or a practice that is neutral in appearance, but likely to entail, for one of the reasons mentioned in the first paragraph, a particular disadvantage for people compared to other people, unless this provision, this criterion or this practice is objectively justified by a legitimate aim and that the means to achieve this aim are necessary and appropriate.’2 For instance, on June 28, 2005, the 17th Correctional Chamber of the Tribunal de Grande Instance de Paris condemned a landlord who had refused to rent an apartment in the 17th arrondissement of Paris, located on the 6th floor with an elevator, on the grounds that the prospective tenant was a disabled person.3 By able-bodied person, we mean a person without physical and/or mental disabilities.4 https://www.ifop.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/118472-Presentation.pdf5 By first stage, we mean the stage of expression of interest, where the applicant expresses their interest and contacts the landlord, who chooses to reply or not. The second stage usually involves the selected applicants visiting the rented property and the signing of a rental agreement between the landlord and the selected applicant. Therefore, while we measure the extent of discrimination at the first stage of the process, further discrimination can still happen at the second stage.6 Indeed, this study compares response rates for disabled applicants and able-bodied applicants when the disabled applicant is more qualified for the housing – for example, having a higher level of inco
主要研究方向为住房经济学、空间经济学和地方公共经济学,尤其注重空间数据计量经济学和影响评价。
{"title":"Discrimination against people with mental, physical or visual disabilities in the French rental housing market: field experiment","authors":"Alexandre Flage, Julie Le Gallo","doi":"10.1080/02673037.2023.2266412","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02673037.2023.2266412","url":null,"abstract":"AbstractWe implement correspondence testing to detect and assess the extent of discrimination against people with disabilities in the French rental housing market. By sending 1,750 emails in a matched-pair procedure, we provide evidence of significant and extensive discrimination against blind people with a guide dog, individuals with mental disabilities, and individuals with motor impairments in the process of rented housing allocation. However, the primary cause of discrimination against blind individuals appears to stem from the presence of the guide dog, rather than the disability itself. Our results are also consistent with the presence of statistical discrimination (particularly based on financial means). We find that absolute discrimination against disabled applicants increases in accordance with the level of rent, while real estate agents discriminate significantly less against disabled applicants than private landlords.Keywords: Disabilitydiscriminationtestinghousing marketfield experimentJEL CLASSIFICATION: C93C12J14R21 Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 French law n° 2008-496 of May 27, 2008: ‘Constitutes direct discrimination the situation in which, on the basis of their origin, gender, disability, sexual orientation, etc., one person is treated less favorably than another is, has been or will have been in a comparable situation. Constitutes indirect discrimination a provision, a criterion or a practice that is neutral in appearance, but likely to entail, for one of the reasons mentioned in the first paragraph, a particular disadvantage for people compared to other people, unless this provision, this criterion or this practice is objectively justified by a legitimate aim and that the means to achieve this aim are necessary and appropriate.’2 For instance, on June 28, 2005, the 17th Correctional Chamber of the Tribunal de Grande Instance de Paris condemned a landlord who had refused to rent an apartment in the 17th arrondissement of Paris, located on the 6th floor with an elevator, on the grounds that the prospective tenant was a disabled person.3 By able-bodied person, we mean a person without physical and/or mental disabilities.4 https://www.ifop.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/118472-Presentation.pdf5 By first stage, we mean the stage of expression of interest, where the applicant expresses their interest and contacts the landlord, who chooses to reply or not. The second stage usually involves the selected applicants visiting the rented property and the signing of a rental agreement between the landlord and the selected applicant. Therefore, while we measure the extent of discrimination at the first stage of the process, further discrimination can still happen at the second stage.6 Indeed, this study compares response rates for disabled applicants and able-bodied applicants when the disabled applicant is more qualified for the housing – for example, having a higher level of inco","PeriodicalId":48138,"journal":{"name":"HOUSING STUDIES","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"136210695","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}