{"title":"Mesoamerica in a Bowl","authors":"Xitlali Aguirre-Dugua, Alejandro Casas","doi":"10.1086/727484","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1086/727484","url":null,"abstract":"Current Anthropology, Ahead of Print. <br/>","PeriodicalId":48343,"journal":{"name":"Current Anthropology","volume":"22 20","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2023-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"50166933","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Hierarchy as a Democratic Value in India","authors":"Anastasia Piliavsky","doi":"10.1086/727010","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1086/727010","url":null,"abstract":"Current Anthropology, Ahead of Print. <br/>","PeriodicalId":48343,"journal":{"name":"Current Anthropology","volume":"21 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2023-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"50166953","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Jesper Borre Pedersen, Jakob Johann Assmann, Signe Normand, Dirk Nikolaus Karger, Felix Riede
Current Anthropology, Ahead of Print.
出版之前的当代人类学。
{"title":"Climate Niche Modeling Reveals the Fate of Pioneering Late Pleistocene Populations in Northern Europe","authors":"Jesper Borre Pedersen, Jakob Johann Assmann, Signe Normand, Dirk Nikolaus Karger, Felix Riede","doi":"10.1086/726700","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1086/726700","url":null,"abstract":"Current Anthropology, Ahead of Print. <br/>","PeriodicalId":48343,"journal":{"name":"Current Anthropology","volume":"21 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2023-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"50166955","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"The Gendering of Anthropological Theory since 2000","authors":"Joshua Reno, Britt Halvorson","doi":"10.1086/726074","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1086/726074","url":null,"abstract":"Current Anthropology, Ahead of Print. <br/>","PeriodicalId":48343,"journal":{"name":"Current Anthropology","volume":"21 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2023-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"50166960","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"In Search of an American Dream","authors":"Rachel Howard","doi":"10.1086/727009","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1086/727009","url":null,"abstract":"Current Anthropology, Ahead of Print. <br/>","PeriodicalId":48343,"journal":{"name":"Current Anthropology","volume":"20 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2023-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"50166964","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
In their article, Jaffe, Campbell, and Shelach-Lavi (2022) allege that Chinese archaeological research and interpretations of the Shimao site mainly serve to reinforce linear histories purporting to explain the rise of dynastic China in the Central Plains. This article is full of factual errors, misleading interpretations, and distortions of people’s arguments. As the corresponding author (Li Liu) for a major research paper on Shimao (Sun et al. 2018) and coauthors of six publications cited numerous times but not invited to provide comments for this article, we are obligated to respond here, although with a restricted word limit. The authors classify research into two types, based on tendentiously selected publications. The first type associates Shimao with legendary figures like the Yellow Emperor. Actually, this approach does not represent mainstream archaeological research on Shimao. Most of the references cited in their article are not written by archaeologists. Shen Changyun’s (whose name is spelled three different ways by the authors: Chen Changgyun, Shen Changyun, and Shen Chengyun) speculative connection between the Yellow Emperor and Shimao was already rejected by the Shimao excavators eight years ago (Sun and Shao 2015). The second type of research, also considered faulty, is said to promote a unilinear evolutionary view of Chinese civilization. Jaffe, Campbell, and Shelach-Lavi applied this allegation freely, without providing a definition of this concept as used in China. In fact, since the 1980s, most Chinese archaeologists have supported a multilinear evolutionary model, as discussed in many influential publications, some with reference to Shimao (Dai 2020; Gao 2013). These works were completely ignored by the authors. Jaffe, Campbell, and Shelach-Lavi state that “arguments about the military expansion of Erlitou (Liu 2004:232–234) are based on some very rudimentary similarities in the pottery found in different regions” (99). In the three pages cited from Liu (2004), the words “pottery similarities” do not appear. Rather, issues related to settlement patterns and distribution of various material
在他们的文章中，Jaffe, Campbell和Shelach-Lavi(2022)声称，中国对世茂遗址的考古研究和解释主要是为了加强线性历史，旨在解释中国王朝在中原地区的崛起。这篇文章充满了事实错误、误导性解释和对人们论点的扭曲。作为一篇关于世茂的重要研究论文的通讯作者(李柳)(Sun et al. 2018)和六篇被多次引用但未被邀请为本文提供评论的出版物的共同作者，我们有义务在这里回复，尽管字数有限。作者根据倾向选择的出版物将研究分为两类。第一种类型将世茂与黄帝等传奇人物联系在一起。实际上，这种方法并不代表石茂考古研究的主流。他们文章中引用的大部分参考文献都不是考古学家写的。沈长云(他的名字有三种不同的拼写方式:陈长云、沈长云和沈承云)关于黄帝和世茂之间联系的推测，早在八年前就被世茂挖掘者否定了(Sun and Shao 2015)。第二种类型的研究，也被认为是错误的，据说促进了中国文明的单线进化观点。Jaffe, Campbell和Shelach-Lavi随意地使用了这一说法，而没有提供中国使用的这一概念的定义。事实上，自20世纪80年代以来，大多数中国考古学家都支持多线性进化模型，正如许多有影响力的出版物所讨论的那样，其中一些参考了世茂(Dai 2020;高2013)。这些作品完全被作者忽略了。Jaffe, Campbell和Shelach-Lavi指出，“关于二里头军事扩张的争论(Liu 2004:232-234)是基于在不同地区发现的陶器的一些非常基本的相似性”(99)。在刘(2004)引用的三页中，没有出现“陶器相似性”这个词。而是与各种材料的沉降模式和分布有关的问题
{"title":"Misinterpretations of Shimao Research and Chinese Archaeology","authors":"Li Liu, Xingcan Chen","doi":"10.1086/726447","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1086/726447","url":null,"abstract":"In their article, Jaffe, Campbell, and Shelach-Lavi (2022) allege that Chinese archaeological research and interpretations of the Shimao site mainly serve to reinforce linear histories purporting to explain the rise of dynastic China in the Central Plains. This article is full of factual errors, misleading interpretations, and distortions of people’s arguments. As the corresponding author (Li Liu) for a major research paper on Shimao (Sun et al. 2018) and coauthors of six publications cited numerous times but not invited to provide comments for this article, we are obligated to respond here, although with a restricted word limit. The authors classify research into two types, based on tendentiously selected publications. The first type associates Shimao with legendary figures like the Yellow Emperor. Actually, this approach does not represent mainstream archaeological research on Shimao. Most of the references cited in their article are not written by archaeologists. Shen Changyun’s (whose name is spelled three different ways by the authors: Chen Changgyun, Shen Changyun, and Shen Chengyun) speculative connection between the Yellow Emperor and Shimao was already rejected by the Shimao excavators eight years ago (Sun and Shao 2015). The second type of research, also considered faulty, is said to promote a unilinear evolutionary view of Chinese civilization. Jaffe, Campbell, and Shelach-Lavi applied this allegation freely, without providing a definition of this concept as used in China. In fact, since the 1980s, most Chinese archaeologists have supported a multilinear evolutionary model, as discussed in many influential publications, some with reference to Shimao (Dai 2020; Gao 2013). These works were completely ignored by the authors. Jaffe, Campbell, and Shelach-Lavi state that “arguments about the military expansion of Erlitou (Liu 2004:232–234) are based on some very rudimentary similarities in the pottery found in different regions” (99). In the three pages cited from Liu (2004), the words “pottery similarities” do not appear. Rather, issues related to settlement patterns and distribution of various material","PeriodicalId":48343,"journal":{"name":"Current Anthropology","volume":"64 1","pages":"464 - 465"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45894363","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：