首页 > 最新文献

Educational Psychology Review最新文献

英文 中文
Systematic Review of Educational Approaches to Misinformation 错误信息教育方法的系统回顾
IF 10.1 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL Pub Date : 2025-04-23 DOI: 10.1007/s10648-025-10012-8
Martina A. Rau, Anna E. Premo

Misinformation can have severe negative effects on people’s decisions, behaviors, and on society at large. This creates a need to develop and evaluate educational interventions that prepare people to recognize and respond to misinformation. We systematically review 107 articles describing educational interventions across various lines of research. In characterizing existing educational interventions, this review combines a theory-driven approach with a data-driven approach. The theory-driven approach uncovered that educational interventions differ in terms of how they define misinformation and regarding which misinformation characteristics they target. The data-driven approach uncovered that educational interventions have been addressed by research on the misinformation effect, lie detection, information literacy, and fraud trainings, with each line of research yielding different types of interventions. Furthermore, this article reviews evidence about the interventions’ effectiveness. Besides identifying several promising types of interventions, comparisons across different lines of research yield open questions that future research should address to identify ways to increase people's resilience towards misinformation.

错误信息会对人们的决定、行为和整个社会产生严重的负面影响。这就需要制定和评估教育干预措施,使人们做好认识和应对错误信息的准备。我们系统地回顾了107篇描述不同研究领域教育干预的文章。在描述现有的教育干预措施时,本综述结合了理论驱动的方法和数据驱动的方法。理论驱动的方法发现,教育干预在如何定义错误信息和针对哪些错误信息特征方面存在差异。数据驱动的方法发现,教育干预已经通过对错误信息效应、测谎、信息素养和欺诈培训的研究来解决,每条研究线都产生了不同类型的干预。此外,本文回顾了有关干预措施有效性的证据。除了确定几种有希望的干预措施外,不同研究领域的比较还产生了一些悬而未决的问题,未来的研究应该解决这些问题,以确定提高人们对错误信息的适应能力的方法。
{"title":"Systematic Review of Educational Approaches to Misinformation","authors":"Martina A. Rau, Anna E. Premo","doi":"10.1007/s10648-025-10012-8","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-025-10012-8","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Misinformation can have severe negative effects on people’s decisions, behaviors, and on society at large. This creates a need to develop and evaluate educational interventions that prepare people to recognize and respond to misinformation. We systematically review 107 articles describing educational interventions across various lines of research. In characterizing existing educational interventions, this review combines a theory-driven approach with a data-driven approach. The theory-driven approach uncovered that educational interventions differ in terms of how they define misinformation and regarding which misinformation characteristics they target. The data-driven approach uncovered that educational interventions have been addressed by research on the misinformation effect, lie detection, information literacy, and fraud trainings, with each line of research yielding different types of interventions. Furthermore, this article reviews evidence about the interventions’ effectiveness. Besides identifying several promising types of interventions, comparisons across different lines of research yield open questions that future research should address to identify ways to increase people's resilience towards misinformation.</p>","PeriodicalId":48344,"journal":{"name":"Educational Psychology Review","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.1,"publicationDate":"2025-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143863033","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Motivating Motivation Regulation Research—An Evidence and Gap Map Approach 激励动机调控研究——一种证据与缺口图方法
IF 10.1 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL Pub Date : 2025-04-23 DOI: 10.1007/s10648-025-10019-1
Maike Trautner, Carola Grunschel, Malte Schwinger

Learners’ attempts to regulate their own motivation for studying in the face of tedious or difficult tasks is an important aspect of self-regulated learning. Therefore, motivation regulation has received increasing attention over the past few years, resulting in numerous publications using different definitions of the construct, samples, operationalizations, and research designs. The aim of this systematic review is to present an interactive evidence and gap map synthesizing current research with respect to what we know about motivation regulation, what the sources (e.g., samples, research methods, operationalizations) of this knowledge are, and which aspects proposed by theoretical models of motivation regulation remain understudied. Based on a systematic literature search, N = 289 studies were included. Approximately three quarters of the studies examined motivation regulation of university students, used cross-sectional study designs, and self-report questionnaires. Achievement, effort-related variables, (meta-)cognitive learning strategies, and goal orientations were the most frequently reported correlates of motivation regulation. Motivation regulation was examined mainly for learning in general, but also in more specific contexts, such as digital or foreign language learning. The maps’ gaps reveal that we still know little about motivation regulation in pre- and primary school children and its development across school years. Furthermore, despite the conceptualization of self-regulation as a context dependent construct, contextual characteristics have received little attention. These and other gaps are discussed, including suggestions for advancing theoretical models of motivation regulation. The structured maps enable quick overviews of evidence (gaps), aiding a rapid, strategic development of future research questions and potential meta-analyses.

学习者在面对繁琐或困难的任务时试图调节自己的学习动机是自我调节学习的一个重要方面。因此,在过去的几年中,动机调节受到了越来越多的关注,导致许多出版物使用不同的结构、样本、操作和研究设计的定义。这篇系统综述的目的是提供一个互动的证据和差距图,综合当前的研究,包括我们对动机调节的了解,这些知识的来源(如样本、研究方法、操作方法),以及动机调节理论模型提出的哪些方面仍未得到充分研究。通过系统文献检索,共纳入N = 289项研究。大约四分之三的研究考察了大学生的动机调节,采用了横断面研究设计和自我报告问卷。成就、努力相关变量、(元)认知学习策略和目标取向是最常被报道的动机调节相关因素。动机调节主要针对一般的学习,但也针对更具体的环境,如数字或外语学习。地图上的差距表明,我们对学龄前和小学儿童的动机调节及其在整个学年中的发展仍然知之甚少。此外,尽管自我调节的概念是一种语境依赖的结构,但语境特征却很少受到关注。讨论了这些和其他差距,包括对推进动机调节理论模型的建议。结构化的地图能够快速概述证据(差距),有助于未来研究问题和潜在元分析的快速战略发展。
{"title":"Motivating Motivation Regulation Research—An Evidence and Gap Map Approach","authors":"Maike Trautner, Carola Grunschel, Malte Schwinger","doi":"10.1007/s10648-025-10019-1","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-025-10019-1","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Learners’ attempts to regulate their own motivation for studying in the face of tedious or difficult tasks is an important aspect of self-regulated learning. Therefore, motivation regulation has received increasing attention over the past few years, resulting in numerous publications using different definitions of the construct, samples, operationalizations, and research designs. The aim of this systematic review is to present an interactive evidence and gap map synthesizing current research with respect to what we know about motivation regulation, what the sources (e.g., samples, research methods, operationalizations) of this knowledge are, and which aspects proposed by theoretical models of motivation regulation remain understudied. Based on a systematic literature search, <i>N</i> = 289 studies were included. Approximately three quarters of the studies examined motivation regulation of university students, used cross-sectional study designs, and self-report questionnaires. Achievement, effort-related variables, (meta-)cognitive learning strategies, and goal orientations were the most frequently reported correlates of motivation regulation. Motivation regulation was examined mainly for learning in general, but also in more specific contexts, such as digital or foreign language learning. The maps’ gaps reveal that we still know little about motivation regulation in pre- and primary school children and its development across school years. Furthermore, despite the conceptualization of self-regulation as a context dependent construct, contextual characteristics have received little attention. These and other gaps are discussed, including suggestions for advancing theoretical models of motivation regulation. The structured maps enable quick overviews of evidence (gaps), aiding a rapid, strategic development of future research questions and potential meta-analyses.</p>","PeriodicalId":48344,"journal":{"name":"Educational Psychology Review","volume":"130 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.1,"publicationDate":"2025-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143863032","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Enhancing the Peer-Feedback Process Through Instructional Support: A Meta-Analysis 通过教学支持促进同伴反馈过程:一项元分析
IF 10.1 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL Pub Date : 2025-04-21 DOI: 10.1007/s10648-025-10017-3
Julia Hornstein, Melanie V. Keller, Martin Greisel, Markus Dresel, Ingo Kollar

Peer-feedback can be an effective method to support learning. However, students often require instructional support to provide and process peer-feedback effectively. Previous research used various types of instructional support to improve the quality of peer-feedback processes and outcomes. Yet, a comprehensive overview over their effects is missing. Therefore, this meta-analysis (based on N = 32 studies with N = 3806 learners) investigates the effects of different kinds of instructional support (feedback provision vs. feedback reception; content-specific vs. generic) on peer-feedback processes (formulating high-quality feedback messages, or effectively reflecting on the feedback received) and outcomes (subject-matter-related knowledge). Overall, peer-feedback with vs. without instructional support had a substantial positive effect (g = 0.47). Furthermore, we found a positive effect of feedback provision support on the quality of feedback provision (g = 0.72) and the quality of feedback reception (g = 0.69) but not on subject-matter-related knowledge. For feedback reception support, we found no effects on peer-feedback processes and outcomes at all. During feedback provision, content-specific support positively influenced the quality of feedback provision (g = 0.75) but not subject-matter-related knowledge, while generic support exerts a positive impact on the quality of feedback provision (g = 0.70) and subject-matter-related knowledge (g = 0.55). During feedback reception, we again found no significant effects of content-related support and generic support at all. The lack of effects for feedback reception support may be related to the limited number of studies on feedback reception in general. Finally, concrete implications and suggestions for future research are provided.

同伴反馈是支持学习的有效方法。然而,学生通常需要教学支持来有效地提供和处理同伴反馈。先前的研究使用各种类型的教学支持来提高同伴反馈过程和结果的质量。然而,缺乏对其影响的全面概述。因此,本荟萃分析(基于N = 32项研究,N = 3806名学习者)调查了不同类型的教学支持(反馈提供与反馈接受;内容特定vs.通用)的同行反馈过程(制定高质量的反馈信息,或有效地反映收到的反馈)和结果(主题相关的知识)。总体而言,有无教学支持的同伴反馈有实质性的积极影响(g = 0.47)。此外,我们发现反馈提供支持对反馈提供的质量(g = 0.72)和反馈接收的质量(g = 0.69)有积极影响,但对主题相关知识没有积极影响。对于反馈接收支持,我们发现对同伴反馈过程和结果没有任何影响。在提供反馈时,特定内容的支持对反馈提供的质量(g = 0.75)有正向影响,但对与主题相关的知识没有正向影响,而一般支持对反馈提供的质量(g = 0.70)和与主题相关的知识(g = 0.55)有正向影响。在反馈接收过程中,我们再次发现与内容相关的支持和通用支持根本没有显著影响。反馈接收支持效应的缺乏可能与总体上对反馈接收的研究数量有限有关。最后,对未来的研究提出了具体的启示和建议。
{"title":"Enhancing the Peer-Feedback Process Through Instructional Support: A Meta-Analysis","authors":"Julia Hornstein, Melanie V. Keller, Martin Greisel, Markus Dresel, Ingo Kollar","doi":"10.1007/s10648-025-10017-3","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-025-10017-3","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Peer-feedback can be an effective method to support learning. However, students often require instructional support to provide and process peer-feedback effectively. Previous research used various types of instructional support to improve the quality of peer-feedback processes and outcomes. Yet, a comprehensive overview over their effects is missing. Therefore, this meta-analysis (based on <i>N</i> = 32 studies with <i>N</i> = 3806 learners) investigates the effects of different kinds of instructional support (feedback provision vs. feedback reception; content-specific vs. generic) on peer-feedback processes (formulating high-quality feedback messages, or effectively reflecting on the feedback received) and outcomes (subject-matter-related knowledge). Overall, peer-feedback with vs. without instructional support had a substantial positive effect (<i>g</i> = 0.47). Furthermore, we found a positive effect of feedback provision support on the quality of feedback provision (<i>g</i> = 0.72) and the quality of feedback reception (<i>g</i> = 0.69) but not on subject-matter-related knowledge. For feedback reception support, we found no effects on peer-feedback processes and outcomes at all. During feedback provision, content-specific support positively influenced the quality of feedback provision (<i>g</i> = 0.75) but not subject-matter-related knowledge, while generic support exerts a positive impact on the quality of feedback provision (<i>g</i> = 0.70) and subject-matter-related knowledge (<i>g</i> = 0.55). During feedback reception, we again found no significant effects of content-related support and generic support at all. The lack of effects for feedback reception support may be related to the limited number of studies on feedback reception in general. Finally, concrete implications and suggestions for future research are provided.</p>","PeriodicalId":48344,"journal":{"name":"Educational Psychology Review","volume":"65 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.1,"publicationDate":"2025-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143853499","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Psychological Science and the Blind Spot in Education: Learning and Instruction of Transversal Skills in the Twenty-First Century 心理科学与教育盲点:21世纪横向技能的学习与教学
IF 10.1 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL Pub Date : 2025-04-17 DOI: 10.1007/s10648-025-10014-6
Anke Maria Weber, Ester van Laar, Francesca Borgonovi, Phillip L. Ackerman, Nia Nixon, Arthur C. Graesser, Samuel Greiff

Transversal skills describe a broad spectrum of skills that are considered to be essential for thriving in today’s society and tackling the challenges of the twenty-first century. Therefore, a high demand is placed on educators to teach these skills to their students. Unfortunately, the conceptualization of transversal skills remains vague with different frameworks reporting on various transversal skills, which complicates a translation of these skills into educational practice and research, thereby making them a “blind spot” in psychological research and educational practice. This paper brings the blind spot on transversal skills to a direct focus. First, we propose a conceptualization of transversal skills through a review and integration of existing frameworks. We organize transversal skills into four core concepts: cognitive skills (e.g., creativity and problem-solving), citizenship (e.g., democratic participation and respect), well-being (e.g., mental and physical health), and social-emotional skills (e.g., collaboration and communication). Second, we highlight possible ways to implement these core concepts into educational practice by providing specific examples on how to integrate specific skills into five subjects: language, mathematics, science, social studies, and arts and music. Third, a research agenda is proposed that considers the structure and underlying processes of transversal skills, their development and interventions at different stages, their predictive validity for success, and cultural differences and diversity.

横向技能描述了广泛的技能,这些技能被认为是在当今社会蓬勃发展和应对21世纪挑战所必需的。因此,教育工作者向学生传授这些技能的要求很高。不幸的是,横向技能的概念仍然模糊,不同的框架报道各种横向技能,这使得将这些技能转化为教育实践和研究变得复杂,从而使其成为心理学研究和教育实践中的“盲点”。本文将横向技能的盲点带到了直接关注的焦点。首先,我们通过对现有框架的回顾和整合,提出了横向技能的概念化。我们将横向技能组织为四个核心概念:认知技能(例如,创造力和解决问题),公民身份(例如,民主参与和尊重),福祉(例如,身心健康)和社会情感技能(例如,协作和沟通)。其次,我们通过提供如何将特定技能整合到五个学科(语言、数学、科学、社会研究、艺术和音乐)中的具体例子,强调了将这些核心概念应用到教育实践中的可能方法。第三,提出了一个研究议程,考虑横向技能的结构和基本过程,它们在不同阶段的发展和干预,它们对成功的预测有效性,以及文化差异和多样性。
{"title":"Psychological Science and the Blind Spot in Education: Learning and Instruction of Transversal Skills in the Twenty-First Century","authors":"Anke Maria Weber, Ester van Laar, Francesca Borgonovi, Phillip L. Ackerman, Nia Nixon, Arthur C. Graesser, Samuel Greiff","doi":"10.1007/s10648-025-10014-6","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-025-10014-6","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Transversal skills describe a broad spectrum of skills that are considered to be essential for thriving in today’s society and tackling the challenges of the twenty-first century. Therefore, a high demand is placed on educators to teach these skills to their students. Unfortunately, the conceptualization of transversal skills remains vague with different frameworks reporting on various transversal skills, which complicates a translation of these skills into educational practice and research, thereby making them a “blind spot” in psychological research and educational practice. This paper brings the blind spot on transversal skills to a direct focus. First, we propose a conceptualization of transversal skills through a review and integration of existing frameworks. We organize transversal skills into four core concepts: <i>cognitive skills</i> (e.g., creativity and problem-solving), <i>citizenship</i> (e.g., democratic participation and respect), <i>well-being</i> (e.g., mental and physical health), and <i>social-emotional skills</i> (e.g., collaboration and communication). Second, we highlight possible ways to implement these core concepts into educational practice by providing specific examples on how to integrate specific skills into five subjects: language, mathematics, science, social studies, and arts and music. Third, a research agenda is proposed that considers the structure and underlying processes of transversal skills, their development and interventions at different stages, their predictive validity for success, and cultural differences and diversity.</p>","PeriodicalId":48344,"journal":{"name":"Educational Psychology Review","volume":"377 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.1,"publicationDate":"2025-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143841417","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Teacher Emotional Competence: A Conceptual Model 教师情绪能力:一个概念模型
IF 10.1 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL Pub Date : 2025-04-16 DOI: 10.1007/s10648-025-10018-2
Elena Savina, Caroline Fulton, Christina Beaton

The classroom represents a complex socio-cultural environment where emotions emerge as a result of instruction, learning, and interpersonal transactions. Teachers’ ability to recognize, regulate, and respond to emotions in the classroom has powerful consequences for students’ behavior, learning, and the teacher’s own well-being. In order to be effective in instruction and classroom management and to prevent emotional burnout, teachers have to be emotionally competent. Furthermore, fostering teachers’ emotional competence helps with teacher retention. Several studies documented the positive effects of emotional training of aspiring and practicing teachers. However, there is a need for a better understanding of specific emotional skills pertinent to the teaching profession. We propose eight competencies essential for teachers to be effective in using emotions for instructional and relational purposes and managing their own and students’ emotions. These competencies include (1) understanding teachers’ own emotions; (2) effective emotion regulation; (3) effective emotional communication; (4) maintaining teachers’ emotional well-being; (5) understanding and responding to students’ emotions; (6) utilizing emotions to promote learning; (7) utilizing emotions to foster positive relationships and emotional climate in the classroom; and (8) promoting students’ social-emotional learning. We further identified discrete emotional skills within each competence and their implication for instruction, classroom management, social-emotional learning in the classroom, and teachers’ well-being. The proposed model of teacher emotional competence can be used as a springboard to develop emotional training programs and guide assessment practices aimed at the evaluation of teachers’ emotional skills.

课堂是一个复杂的社会文化环境,教学、学习和人际交往都会产生情绪。教师在课堂上识别、调节和应对情绪的能力对学生的行为、学习和教师自身的幸福都有很大的影响。为了有效地进行教学和课堂管理,防止情绪倦怠,教师必须具备情绪能力。此外,培养教师的情感能力有助于留住教师。一些研究表明,对有抱负的教师和在职教师进行情感培训会产生积极影响。然而,我们还需要更好地了解与教师职业相关的具体情感技能。我们提出了教师必须具备的八种能力,以便有效地将情绪用于教学和人际关系,并管理好自己和学生的情绪。这些能力包括:(1)了解教师自身的情绪;(2)有效的情绪调节;(3)有效的情绪交流;(4)保持教师的情绪健康;(5)了解并回应学生的情绪;(6)利用情绪促进学习;(7)利用情绪在课堂上培养积极的人际关系和情绪氛围;(8)促进学生的社会情感学习。我们进一步确定了每种能力中的不同情感技能及其对教学、课堂管理、课堂中的社会情感学习和教师幸福的影响。所提出的教师情绪能力模型可作为制定情绪培训计划和指导教师情绪能力评估实践的跳板。
{"title":"Teacher Emotional Competence: A Conceptual Model","authors":"Elena Savina, Caroline Fulton, Christina Beaton","doi":"10.1007/s10648-025-10018-2","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-025-10018-2","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The classroom represents a complex socio-cultural environment where emotions emerge as a result of instruction, learning, and interpersonal transactions. Teachers’ ability to recognize, regulate, and respond to emotions in the classroom has powerful consequences for students’ behavior, learning, and the teacher’s own well-being. In order to be effective in instruction and classroom management and to prevent emotional burnout, teachers have to be emotionally competent. Furthermore, fostering teachers’ emotional competence helps with teacher retention. Several studies documented the positive effects of emotional training of aspiring and practicing teachers. However, there is a need for a better understanding of specific emotional skills pertinent to the teaching profession. We propose eight competencies essential for teachers to be effective in using emotions for instructional and relational purposes and managing their own and students’ emotions. These competencies include (1) understanding teachers’ own emotions; (2) effective emotion regulation; (3) effective emotional communication; (4) maintaining teachers’ emotional well-being; (5) understanding and responding to students’ emotions; (6) utilizing emotions to promote learning; (7) utilizing emotions to foster positive relationships and emotional climate in the classroom; and (8) promoting students’ social-emotional learning. We further identified discrete emotional skills within each competence and their implication for instruction, classroom management, social-emotional learning in the classroom, and teachers’ well-being. The proposed model of teacher emotional competence can be used as a springboard to develop emotional training programs and guide assessment practices aimed at the evaluation of teachers’ emotional skills.</p>","PeriodicalId":48344,"journal":{"name":"Educational Psychology Review","volume":"26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.1,"publicationDate":"2025-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143837069","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Strengthening Conscientiousness by Means of Interventions: A Systematic Review 通过干预手段加强责任心:一项系统评价
IF 10.1 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL Pub Date : 2025-04-12 DOI: 10.1007/s10648-025-10016-4
Melanie Turner, Flaviu A. Hodis

Conscientiousness has consistent and robust associations with a large set of key student outcomes. Thus, to understand the extent to which conscientiousness could be leveraged to support students’ learning, achievement, and well-being, it is important to ascertain whether conscientiousness could be strengthened by means of interventions. To narrow this important knowledge gap, this research synthesizes the findings of recent studies on the efficacy of interventions designed to increase conscientiousness. To this end, we conducted a systematic review of several online databases to identify relevant articles published after the last major review of personality change interventions (in 2017). The search yielded 11 articles that met our inclusion criteria. These studies used one of three types of interventions: digital coaching, in-person coaching, and behavior activation. Nine of the interventions we reviewed significantly increased conscientiousness at either the trait, facet, or state level. Our review identified several gaps in conscientiousness intervention literature, such as the lack of knowledge about mediating and moderating factors of intervention effects and the relative paucity of studies assessing the maintenance of intervention effects. The article discusses the significance of these findings and, building upon them, delineates important directions for future research and intervention.

严谨性与学生的一系列主要成绩有着一致而强烈的联系。因此,要了解尽责性在多大程度上可以用来支持学生的学习、成就和幸福,确定尽责性是否可以通过干预手段得到加强是很重要的。为了缩小这一重要的知识差距,本研究综合了最近关于旨在提高责任心的干预措施有效性的研究结果。为此,我们对几个在线数据库进行了系统回顾,以确定在上一次人格改变干预措施的重大回顾(2017年)之后发表的相关文章。搜索得到了11篇符合我们纳入标准的文章。这些研究使用了三种干预措施中的一种:数字指导、面对面指导和行为激活。我们回顾的干预措施中有九项在特征、方面或状态水平上显著增加了责任心。我们的回顾发现了尽责性干预文献中的一些空白,例如缺乏对干预效果的中介和调节因素的了解,以及评估干预效果维持的研究相对缺乏。本文讨论了这些发现的意义,并在此基础上,描绘了未来研究和干预的重要方向。
{"title":"Strengthening Conscientiousness by Means of Interventions: A Systematic Review","authors":"Melanie Turner, Flaviu A. Hodis","doi":"10.1007/s10648-025-10016-4","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-025-10016-4","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Conscientiousness has consistent and robust associations with a large set of key student outcomes. Thus, to understand the extent to which conscientiousness could be leveraged to support students’ learning, achievement, and well-being, it is important to ascertain whether conscientiousness could be strengthened by means of interventions. To narrow this important knowledge gap, this research synthesizes the findings of recent studies on the efficacy of interventions designed to increase conscientiousness. To this end, we conducted a systematic review of several online databases to identify relevant articles published after the last major review of personality change interventions (in 2017). The search yielded 11 articles that met our inclusion criteria. These studies used one of three types of interventions: digital coaching, in-person coaching, and behavior activation. Nine of the interventions we reviewed significantly increased conscientiousness at either the trait, facet, or state level. Our review identified several gaps in conscientiousness intervention literature, such as the lack of knowledge about mediating and moderating factors of intervention effects and the relative paucity of studies assessing the maintenance of intervention effects. The article discusses the significance of these findings and, building upon them, delineates important directions for future research and intervention.</p>","PeriodicalId":48344,"journal":{"name":"Educational Psychology Review","volume":"50 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.1,"publicationDate":"2025-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143822494","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Centering Social Fit, Self-Concept Fit, Goal Fit, and Resource Fit as Core Elements of Students’ Experiences of Belonging at School 以社会契合度、自我概念契合度、目标契合度、资源契合度为学生在校归属感体验的核心要素
IF 10.1 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL Pub Date : 2025-04-12 DOI: 10.1007/s10648-025-10009-3
Alexander S. Browman

A common theme across psychological research on belonging in school has been a focus on the social—on the quality of students’ connections to others in the school environment. In this review, I argue that when a student indicates that they do or do not “feel like I belong at my school,” social connections are necessary but not sufficient to fully explain that experience. Extending Schmader and Sedikides’ State Authenticity as Fit to Environment model, I instead propose that this experience hinges on four factors: the degrees to which (a) teachers and other students accept, value, and include a student socially (social fit), (b) an academic setting’s structures and norms support and afford their personal goals and values (goal fit), (c) the school environment naturally activates or supports their connections to their most valued identities (self-concept fit), and (d) the school environment provides sufficient financial, nutritional, health, and safety resources to meet their needs in these domains (resource fit). In reviewing how students, especially those from from historically under-researched backgrounds, define belonging, I demonstrate both the divergence of their definitions from the traditional psychological focus on social connections alone, and the convergence of their definitions with these four forms of person–environment fit. I therefore argue that shifting to a model of students’ experiences of belonging that centers on self-concept, goal, resource and social fit would provide an especially fruitful future for research on this subject.

关于学校归属感的心理学研究有一个共同的主题,那就是关注社会--关注学生在学校环境中与他人联系的质量。在这篇综述中,我认为,当学生表示他们有或没有 "在学校的归属感 "时,社会联系是必要的,但不足以完全解释这种体验。根据施马德(Schmader)和塞迪基德斯(Sedikides)的 "适合环境的状态真实性 "模型,我认为这种体验取决于以下四个因素:(a) 教师和其他学生在多大程度上接受、重视和包容学生(社会契合度);(b) 学术环境的结构和规范在多大程度上支持和负担学生的个人目标和价值观(目标契合度);(c) 学校环境在多大程度上自然地激活或支持学生与他们最珍视的身份的联系(自我概念契合度);(d) 学校环境在多大程度上提供足够的经济、营养、健康和安全资源以满足他们在这些领域的需求(资源契合度)。在回顾学生,特别是那些来自历史研究不足背景的学生如何定义归属感时,我展示了他们的定义与传统心理学仅关注社会联系的不同之处,以及他们的定义与这四种形式的人与环境契合的趋同之处。因此,我认为,转向以自我概念、目标、资源和社会契合为中心的学生归属感体验模型,将为这一主题的研究提供一个特别富有成果的未来。
{"title":"Centering Social Fit, Self-Concept Fit, Goal Fit, and Resource Fit as Core Elements of Students’ Experiences of Belonging at School","authors":"Alexander S. Browman","doi":"10.1007/s10648-025-10009-3","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-025-10009-3","url":null,"abstract":"<p>A common theme across psychological research on belonging in school has been a focus on the social—on the quality of students’ connections to others in the school environment. In this review, I argue that when a student indicates that they do or do not “feel like I belong at my school,” social connections are necessary but not sufficient to fully explain that experience. Extending Schmader and Sedikides’ State Authenticity as Fit to Environment model, I instead propose that this experience hinges on four factors: the degrees to which (a) teachers and other students accept, value, and include a student socially (social fit), (b) an academic setting’s structures and norms support and afford their personal goals and values (goal fit), (c) the school environment naturally activates or supports their connections to their most valued identities (self-concept fit), and (d) the school environment provides sufficient financial, nutritional, health, and safety resources to meet their needs in these domains (resource fit). In reviewing how students, especially those from from historically under-researched backgrounds, define belonging, I demonstrate both the divergence of their definitions from the traditional psychological focus on social connections alone, and the convergence of their definitions with these four forms of person–environment fit. I therefore argue that shifting to a model of students’ experiences of belonging that centers on self-concept, goal, resource <i>and</i> social fit would provide an especially fruitful future for research on this subject.</p>","PeriodicalId":48344,"journal":{"name":"Educational Psychology Review","volume":"37 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.1,"publicationDate":"2025-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143822635","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Why We Might Still be Concerned About Low Cronbach’s Alphas in Domain-specific Knowledge Tests 为什么我们仍然会对特定领域知识测试的低克朗巴赫系数感到担忧?
IF 10.1 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL Pub Date : 2025-04-11 DOI: 10.1007/s10648-025-10015-5
Steffen Zitzmann, Gabe A. Orona

Edelsbrunner et al. Educational Psychology Review, 37, 1–43, 2025 recently published a systematic review and meta-analysis of Cronbach's alphas in domain-specific knowledge tests. While appreciating their analysis and agreeing with most findings, we disagree with three messages regarding the use of alpha in knowledge tests: (1) alpha measures the strength of interrelations among items, (2) a low alpha indicates validity, and (3) thresholds for alpha be abandoned. We discuss these messages in a constructive manner and present a way to counteract the inflation of seemingly high alphas in educational psychology.

最近,Edelsbrunner 等人在《教育心理学评论》(Educational Psychology Review)第 37 卷第 1-43 期发表了一篇关于特定领域知识测试中克朗巴赫系数的系统回顾和元分析文章。我们对他们的分析表示赞赏,并同意他们的大部分结论,但我们不同意关于在知识测试中使用α的三个信息:(1)α衡量项目间相互关系的强度;(2)低α表明有效性;(3)放弃α的临界值。我们以建设性的方式讨论了这些信息,并提出了一种方法来抵制教育心理学中看似高α的膨胀。
{"title":"Why We Might Still be Concerned About Low Cronbach’s Alphas in Domain-specific Knowledge Tests","authors":"Steffen Zitzmann, Gabe A. Orona","doi":"10.1007/s10648-025-10015-5","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-025-10015-5","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Edelsbrunner et al. <i>Educational Psychology Review,</i> <i>37</i>, 1–43, 2025 recently published a systematic review and meta-analysis of Cronbach's alphas in domain-specific knowledge tests. While appreciating their analysis and agreeing with most findings, we disagree with three messages regarding the use of alpha in knowledge tests: (1) alpha measures the strength of interrelations among items, (2) a low alpha indicates validity, and (3) thresholds for alpha be abandoned. We discuss these messages in a constructive manner and present a way to counteract the inflation of seemingly high alphas in educational psychology.</p>","PeriodicalId":48344,"journal":{"name":"Educational Psychology Review","volume":"28 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.1,"publicationDate":"2025-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143819039","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Who Gets to Belong in College? An Empirical Review of How Institutions Can Assess and Expand Opportunities for Belonging on Campus 谁才是大学的归属?机构如何评估和扩大校园归属感机会的实证研究
IF 10.1 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL Pub Date : 2025-04-09 DOI: 10.1007/s10648-025-10010-w
Kathryn M. Kroeper, Maithreyi Gopalan, Katherine T. U. Emerson, Gregory M. Walton

Over a dozen rigorous randomized-controlled trials show that recognizing worries about belonging in a new school as normal and as improving with time can help students stay engaged, build relationships, and succeed. Such “social-belonging” interventions can help students take advantage of opportunities available to them to develop their belonging in college—yet what is the institutional role? Drawing on past literature, and reporting novel data from the College Transition Collaborative’s massive trial of the social-belonging intervention (N = 15,143 control-condition students in 374 “local-identity” groups across 22 representative colleges and universities; Walton et al., 2023), we explore who gets to belong in college and what institutional leaders can do to expand these opportunities. First, we find that opportunities for belonging (i.e., “belonging affordances”) vary widely, both across institutions and systematically across groups. Notably, Black, Asian, and first-generation college student groups are each less likely than other groups to have minimally adequate opportunities for belonging. Second, all institutions are serving some student groups well, but all can improve: none provides adequate belonging affordances for all groups. Third, four classes of institutional factors predict belonging affordances at the identity-group level: (1) greater in-group representation, (2) more inclusive cultures, (3) greater opportunities for strong relationships, and (4) greater opportunities for productive learning. We conclude by discussing how institutions can learn for whom they are creating opportunities for belonging and for whom they are not, and how institutions can expand opportunities for belonging for groups that are not yet well served.

十几项严格的随机对照试验表明,认识到对新学校归属感的担忧是正常的,并随着时间的推移而改善,可以帮助学生保持投入,建立关系,并取得成功。这种“社会归属感”干预可以帮助学生利用他们在大学里获得的机会来发展他们的归属感——然而,机构的作用是什么?借鉴过去的文献,并报告了大学转型合作组织对社会归属感干预的大规模试验的新数据(N = 15,143名控制条件的学生,来自22所代表性高校的374个“本地认同”群体;Walton et al., 2023),我们探讨了谁可以进入大学,以及机构领导者可以做些什么来扩大这些机会。首先,我们发现归属的机会(即“归属能力”)在不同机构和不同群体之间都有很大差异。值得注意的是,黑人、亚裔和第一代大学生群体都比其他群体更不可能拥有最低限度的归属感机会。第二,所有的学校都很好地服务了一些学生群体,但都可以改进:没有一个为所有的群体提供足够的归属感。第三,四类制度因素预测了身份群体层面的归属支持度:(1)更大的群体内代表性,(2)更包容的文化,(3)更大的建立牢固关系的机会,以及(4)更大的生产性学习机会。最后,我们讨论了机构如何了解它们正在为哪些人创造归属感的机会,而不是为哪些人创造归属感的机会,以及机构如何为尚未得到良好服务的群体扩大归属感的机会。
{"title":"Who Gets to Belong in College? An Empirical Review of How Institutions Can Assess and Expand Opportunities for Belonging on Campus","authors":"Kathryn M. Kroeper, Maithreyi Gopalan, Katherine T. U. Emerson, Gregory M. Walton","doi":"10.1007/s10648-025-10010-w","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-025-10010-w","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Over a dozen rigorous randomized-controlled trials show that recognizing worries about belonging in a new school as normal and as improving with time can help students stay engaged, build relationships, and succeed. Such “social-belonging” interventions can help students take advantage of opportunities available to them to develop their belonging in college—yet what is the institutional role? Drawing on past literature, and reporting novel data from the College Transition Collaborative’s massive trial of the social-belonging intervention (<i>N</i> = 15,143 control-condition students in 374 “local-identity” groups across 22 representative colleges and universities; Walton et al., 2023), we explore who gets to belong in college and what institutional leaders can do to expand these opportunities. First, we find that opportunities for belonging (i.e., “belonging affordances”) vary widely, both across institutions and systematically across groups. Notably, Black, Asian, and first-generation college student groups are each less likely than other groups to have minimally adequate opportunities for belonging. Second, all institutions are serving some student groups well, but all can improve: none provides adequate belonging affordances for all groups. Third, four classes of institutional factors predict belonging affordances at the identity-group level: (1) greater in-group representation, (2) more inclusive cultures, (3) greater opportunities for strong relationships, and (4) greater opportunities for productive learning. We conclude by discussing how institutions can learn for whom they are creating opportunities for belonging and for whom they are not, and how institutions can expand opportunities for belonging for groups that are not yet well served.</p>","PeriodicalId":48344,"journal":{"name":"Educational Psychology Review","volume":"74 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.1,"publicationDate":"2025-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143805825","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Self-regulated Learning in the Digitally Enhanced Science Classroom: Toward an Early Warning System 数字化强化科学课堂中的自主学习:迈向预警系统
IF 10.1 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL Pub Date : 2025-04-08 DOI: 10.1007/s10648-025-10011-9
Marcus Kubsch, Sebastian Strauß, Adrian Grimm, Sebastian Gombert, Hendrik Drachsler, Knut Neumann, Nikol Rummel

Recent research underscores the importance of inquiry learning for effective science education. Inquiry learning involves self-regulated learning (SRL), for example when students conduct investigations. Teachers face challenges in orchestrating and tracking student learning in such instruction; making it hard to adequately support students. Using AI methods such as machine learning (ML), the data that is generated when students interact in technology-enhanced classrooms can be used to track their learning and subsequently to inform teachers so that they can better support student learning. This study implemented digital workbooks in an inquiry-based physics unit, collecting cognitive, metacognitive, and affective data from 214 students. Using ML methods, an early warning system was developed to predict students’ learning outcomes. Explainable ML methods were used to unpack these predictions and analyses were conducted for potential biases. Results indicate that an integration of cognitive, metacognitive, and affective data can predict students’ productivity with an accuracy ranging from 60 to 100% as the unit progresses. Initially, affective and metacognitive variables dominate predictions, with cognitive variables becoming more significant later. Using only affective and metacognitive data, predictive accuracies ranged from 60 to 80% throughout. Bias was found to be highly dependent on the ML methods being used. The study highlights the potential of digital student workbooks to support SRL in inquiry-based science education, guiding future research and development to enhance instructional feedback and teacher insights into student engagement. Further, the study sheds new light on the data needed and the methodological challenges when using ML methods to investigate SRL processes in classrooms.

最近的研究强调了探究学习对有效的科学教育的重要性。探究性学习包括自我调节学习(SRL),例如当学生进行调查时。在这种教学中,教师面临着协调和跟踪学生学习的挑战;难以充分支持学生。使用机器学习(ML)等人工智能方法,学生在技术增强的教室中互动时产生的数据可用于跟踪他们的学习情况,并随后通知教师,以便他们更好地支持学生的学习。本研究在以探究为基础的物理单元中实施了数字练习册,收集了214名学生的认知、元认知和情感数据。利用机器学习方法,开发了一个早期预警系统来预测学生的学习成果。可解释的ML方法被用来解开这些预测,并对潜在的偏差进行了分析。结果表明,随着单元的进展,认知、元认知和情感数据的整合可以预测学生的生产力,准确率在60%到100%之间。最初,情感和元认知变量主导预测,随后认知变量变得更加重要。仅使用情感和元认知数据,预测准确率在60%到80%之间。发现偏差高度依赖于所使用的ML方法。该研究强调了数字学生练习册在支持研究性科学教育的SRL方面的潜力,指导未来的研究和开发,以增强教学反馈和教师对学生参与的洞察。此外,该研究揭示了在使用ML方法调查教室中SRL过程时所需的数据和方法挑战。
{"title":"Self-regulated Learning in the Digitally Enhanced Science Classroom: Toward an Early Warning System","authors":"Marcus Kubsch, Sebastian Strauß, Adrian Grimm, Sebastian Gombert, Hendrik Drachsler, Knut Neumann, Nikol Rummel","doi":"10.1007/s10648-025-10011-9","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-025-10011-9","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Recent research underscores the importance of inquiry learning for effective science education. Inquiry learning involves self-regulated learning (SRL), for example when students conduct investigations. Teachers face challenges in orchestrating and tracking student learning in such instruction; making it hard to adequately support students. Using AI methods such as machine learning (ML), the data that is generated when students interact in technology-enhanced classrooms can be used to track their learning and subsequently to inform teachers so that they can better support student learning. This study implemented digital workbooks in an inquiry-based physics unit, collecting cognitive, metacognitive, and affective data from 214 students. Using ML methods, an early warning system was developed to predict students’ learning outcomes. Explainable ML methods were used to unpack these predictions and analyses were conducted for potential biases. Results indicate that an integration of cognitive, metacognitive, and affective data can predict students’ productivity with an accuracy ranging from 60 to 100% as the unit progresses. Initially, affective and metacognitive variables dominate predictions, with cognitive variables becoming more significant later. Using only affective and metacognitive data, predictive accuracies ranged from 60 to 80% throughout. Bias was found to be highly dependent on the ML methods being used. The study highlights the potential of digital student workbooks to support SRL in inquiry-based science education, guiding future research and development to enhance instructional feedback and teacher insights into student engagement. Further, the study sheds new light on the data needed and the methodological challenges when using ML methods to investigate SRL processes in classrooms.</p>","PeriodicalId":48344,"journal":{"name":"Educational Psychology Review","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.1,"publicationDate":"2025-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143797900","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Educational Psychology Review
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1