Steven Losorelli, Cherian Kurian Kandathil, Mikhail Saltychev, Eric X Wei, Monica K Rossi-Meyer, Sam P Most
Background: The rise of social media parallels a mental health epidemic. The effect of social media usage on rates and severity of body dysmorphic disorder is not well-understood. Objective: To determine if an association exists between social media engagement, body dysmorphia symptoms, and/or interest in cosmetic surgery in a demographically diverse cross-section of the U.S. adult population. Methods: In a Qualtrics platform-based survey study of the general U.S. adult population, responses to demographic information, social media activity questionnaire and the body dysmorphic disorder screening questionnaire, and interest in cosmetic surgery were collected. Descriptive statistics and a multivariate logistic regression model were carried out. Results: A total of 1,013 respondents completed the survey. The average age was 40.9 (SD, 14.8) years, 72% were women. Median time spent on social media (IQR) was 4 (2-7) h/day. Respondents who screened positive for symptoms of body dysmorphia had higher daily mean social media usage time (odds ratio [OR] 1.49), tend to be female (OR 2.17), younger (OR 0.97), identify as Caucasian (OR 1.65), and are more likely considering a cosmetic procedure in the next year (OR 2.98). Conclusion: This study demonstrates a positive association between daily social media usage, self-reported symptoms of body dysmorphia, and interest in cosmetic procedures.
{"title":"Association Between Symptoms of Body Dysmorphia and Social Media Usage: A Cross-Generational Comparison.","authors":"Steven Losorelli, Cherian Kurian Kandathil, Mikhail Saltychev, Eric X Wei, Monica K Rossi-Meyer, Sam P Most","doi":"10.1089/fpsam.2024.0230","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1089/fpsam.2024.0230","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> The rise of social media parallels a mental health epidemic. The effect of social media usage on rates and severity of body dysmorphic disorder is not well-understood. <b>Objective:</b> To determine if an association exists between social media engagement, body dysmorphia symptoms, and/or interest in cosmetic surgery in a demographically diverse cross-section of the U.S. adult population. <b>Methods</b>: In a Qualtrics platform-based survey study of the general U.S. adult population, responses to demographic information, social media activity questionnaire and the body dysmorphic disorder screening questionnaire, and interest in cosmetic surgery were collected. Descriptive statistics and a multivariate logistic regression model were carried out. <b>Results:</b> A total of 1,013 respondents completed the survey. The average age was 40.9 (SD, 14.8) years, 72% were women. Median time spent on social media (IQR) was 4 (2-7) h/day. Respondents who screened positive for symptoms of body dysmorphia had higher daily mean social media usage time (odds ratio [OR] 1.49), tend to be female (OR 2.17), younger (OR 0.97), identify as Caucasian (OR 1.65), and are more likely considering a cosmetic procedure in the next year (OR 2.98). <b>Conclusion:</b> This study demonstrates a positive association between daily social media usage, self-reported symptoms of body dysmorphia, and interest in cosmetic procedures.</p>","PeriodicalId":48487,"journal":{"name":"Facial Plastic Surgery & Aesthetic Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2025-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143034436","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Maximizing Septal Cartilage and Bone Harvest for Autologous Nasal Septal Grafts in Congenital Cleft Nasal Deformity.","authors":"Luis A Martinez, Emily S Pascal, Tara E Brennan","doi":"10.1089/fpsam.2024.0292","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1089/fpsam.2024.0292","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":48487,"journal":{"name":"Facial Plastic Surgery & Aesthetic Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2025-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143034442","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Cherian Kurian Kandathil, Monica Rossi-Meyer, Mikhail Saltychev, Sam P Most
Objective: To investigate the effectiveness of isotretinoin use in patients with thick nasal skin to improve rhinoplasty outcomes. Methods: The Population Intervention Comparison Outcome framework was utilized for selecting relevant studies for review. The databases of Medline, Embase, Cinahl, Central, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched in June 2024. Original research in adults (≥18 years) who underwent rhinoplasty and administered Isotretinoin pre- and/or postoperatively was included. Case reports, case series (<5 patients), and other letters were excluded. Results: This review identified, 3 (50%) retrospective studies and 3 (50%) randomized controlled trials on the topic. Although four studies demonstrated an improvement in patient's aesthetic satisfaction up to at least 6 months after rhinoplasty, only two studies without control groups, demonstrated a sustained improvement in patient's aesthetic satisfaction up to a year postoperatively. Conclusion: Based on the results of this study, the effectiveness of isotretinoin in rhinoplasty though promising could not be determined due to inconsistent use of treatment protocols, outcome measures, control groups, and long-term follow-up.
目的:探讨异维甲酸在鼻皮厚患者中应用对改善鼻整形效果的效果。方法:采用人口干预比较结果框架,选择相关研究进行综述。2024年6月检索Medline、Embase、Cinahl、Central、Scopus和Web of Science数据库。原始研究纳入了接受鼻整形手术并在术前和/或术后给予异维甲酸的成人(≥18岁)。病例报告,病例系列(结果:本综述确定了3项(50%)回顾性研究和3项(50%)随机对照试验。尽管有四项研究表明,隆鼻术后至少6个月患者的审美满意度有所改善,但只有两项没有对照组的研究表明,患者的审美满意度在术后一年内持续改善。结论:基于本研究的结果,由于治疗方案、结果测量、对照组和长期随访的不一致,异维甲酸在鼻整形术中的有效性虽然很有希望,但仍不能确定。
{"title":"Effectiveness of Isotretinoin Administration in Rhinoplasty: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Cherian Kurian Kandathil, Monica Rossi-Meyer, Mikhail Saltychev, Sam P Most","doi":"10.1089/fpsam.2024.0229","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1089/fpsam.2024.0229","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> To investigate the effectiveness of isotretinoin use in patients with thick nasal skin to improve rhinoplasty outcomes. <b>Methods:</b> The Population Intervention Comparison Outcome framework was utilized for selecting relevant studies for review. The databases of Medline, Embase, Cinahl, Central, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched in June 2024. Original research in adults (≥18 years) who underwent rhinoplasty and administered Isotretinoin pre- and/or postoperatively was included. Case reports, case series (<5 patients), and other letters were excluded. <b>Results:</b> This review identified, 3 (50%) retrospective studies and 3 (50%) randomized controlled trials on the topic. Although four studies demonstrated an improvement in patient's aesthetic satisfaction up to at least 6 months after rhinoplasty, only two studies without control groups, demonstrated a sustained improvement in patient's aesthetic satisfaction up to a year postoperatively. <b>Conclusion:</b> Based on the results of this study, the effectiveness of isotretinoin in rhinoplasty though promising could not be determined due to inconsistent use of treatment protocols, outcome measures, control groups, and long-term follow-up.</p>","PeriodicalId":48487,"journal":{"name":"Facial Plastic Surgery & Aesthetic Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2025-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143014383","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Orthodromic Reshaping Temporalis Tendon Transfer for Aesthetic Facial Reanimation in Adults with Moebius Syndrome and Bilateral Facial Paralysis: Technical Insights and Indications.","authors":"Marielle He, Babak Azizzadeh","doi":"10.1089/fpsam.2024.0303","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1089/fpsam.2024.0303","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":48487,"journal":{"name":"Facial Plastic Surgery & Aesthetic Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2025-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143014384","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Roy W Qu, Max Feng, Alexandra Vacaru, Adeeb Derakhshan, Jennifer C Fuller, Cherine H Kim
{"title":"Dorsal Hump Reduction and Keystone Injury in Human Anatomic Specimens.","authors":"Roy W Qu, Max Feng, Alexandra Vacaru, Adeeb Derakhshan, Jennifer C Fuller, Cherine H Kim","doi":"10.1089/fpsam.2024.0272","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1089/fpsam.2024.0272","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":48487,"journal":{"name":"Facial Plastic Surgery & Aesthetic Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2025-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143014380","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Natalie A Gault, Tulasi A Gopalan, Benjamin Rail, Shai M Rozen
Importance: Bell's palsy (BP) is reported as the most common cause of facial paralysis, yet literature lacks a standardized definition of BP. Objective: To identify and categorize how the term "Bell's palsy" is defined and applied in published medical literature. Evidence Review: Randomized controlled trials, clinical trials, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and reviews containing "Bell's palsy" were identified in MEDLINE, Embase, and CENTRAL databases from inception until April 2, 2024. Articles were indexed by their definition of BP: (1) acute (≤72-h onset) idiopathic facial paralysis with no known etiologies, (2) acute "idiopathic" facial paralysis despite providing etiologies, (3) acute non-idiopathic facial paralysis, (4) non-acute but "idiopathic" facial paralysis with or without providing etiologies, (5) synonymous with facial paralysis, and (6) no definition. Ascribed etiologies were recorded. Original articles' exclusion criteria for patients with BP were also categorized. Findings: Of 4,395 articles obtained, 924 met the criteria. Based on the aforementioned categories, incongruent definitions of BP exist in the literature: (1) 12.88%, (2) 14.72%, (3) 4.00% (4) 15.26%, (5) 8.12%, and (6) 45.02%. Ascribed etiologies and exclusion criteria for BP also varied. Conclusions and Relevance: BP is a common condition seen by providers of many specialties, and as such patient diagnosis, management, and research rely on consistency and a shared language. This systematic review found inconsistent definitions and applications of the term "Bell's palsy" in the literature.
{"title":"Bell's Palsy-Unclear Terminology and Definitions Impede Progress.","authors":"Natalie A Gault, Tulasi A Gopalan, Benjamin Rail, Shai M Rozen","doi":"10.1089/fpsam.2024.0331","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1089/fpsam.2024.0331","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Importance:</b> Bell's palsy (BP) is reported as the most common cause of facial paralysis, yet literature lacks a standardized definition of BP. <b>Objective:</b> To identify and categorize how the term \"Bell's palsy\" is defined and applied in published medical literature. <b>Evidence Review:</b> Randomized controlled trials, clinical trials, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and reviews containing \"Bell's palsy\" were identified in MEDLINE, Embase, and CENTRAL databases from inception until April 2, 2024. Articles were indexed by their definition of BP: (1) acute (≤72-h onset) idiopathic facial paralysis with no known etiologies, (2) acute \"idiopathic\" facial paralysis despite providing etiologies, (3) acute non-idiopathic facial paralysis, (4) non-acute but \"idiopathic\" facial paralysis with or without providing etiologies, (5) synonymous with facial paralysis, and (6) no definition. Ascribed etiologies were recorded. Original articles' exclusion criteria for patients with BP were also categorized. <b>Findings:</b> Of 4,395 articles obtained, 924 met the criteria. Based on the aforementioned categories, incongruent definitions of BP exist in the literature: (1) 12.88%, (2) 14.72%, (3) 4.00% (4) 15.26%, (5) 8.12%, and (6) 45.02%. Ascribed etiologies and exclusion criteria for BP also varied. <b>Conclusions and Relevance:</b> BP is a common condition seen by providers of many specialties, and as such patient diagnosis, management, and research rely on consistency and a shared language. This systematic review found inconsistent definitions and applications of the term \"Bell's palsy\" in the literature.</p>","PeriodicalId":48487,"journal":{"name":"Facial Plastic Surgery & Aesthetic Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2025-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143014377","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Frida S Chavez, Tasher Losenegger, Peter C Revenaugh, Ryan M Smith, James C Wang, Bobby Tajudeen, Michael Eggerstedt
{"title":"Crowdsourcing as a Tool to Compare and Evaluate Outcomes of Rhytidectomy Techniques.","authors":"Frida S Chavez, Tasher Losenegger, Peter C Revenaugh, Ryan M Smith, James C Wang, Bobby Tajudeen, Michael Eggerstedt","doi":"10.1089/fpsam.2024.0189","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1089/fpsam.2024.0189","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":48487,"journal":{"name":"Facial Plastic Surgery & Aesthetic Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2025-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143014379","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Khodayar Goshtasbi, Corliss Best, Bethany Powers, Harry Ching, Norman J Pastorek, Donald Altman, Peter Adamson, Mark Krugman, Brian J F Wong
Background: Various large language models (LLMs) can provide human-level medical discussions, but they have not been compared regarding rhinoplasty knowledge. Objective: To compare the leading LLMs in answering complex rhinoplasty consultation questions as evaluated by plastic surgeons. Methods: Ten open-ended rhinoplasty consultation questions were presented to ChatGPT-4o, Google Gemini, Claude, and Meta-AI LLMs. The responses were randomized and ranked by seven rhinoplasty-specializing plastic surgeons (1 = worst, 4 = best) considering their quality. Textual readability was analyzed via Flesch Reading Ease (FRE) and Flesch-Kincaid Grade (FKG). Results: Claude provided the top answers for seven questions while ChatGPT provided the top answers for three questions. In overall collective scoring, Claude provided the best answers with 224 points, followed by ChatGPT's 200, Meta's 138, and Gemini's 138 scores. Claude (mean score/question 3.20 ± 1.00) significantly outperformed all the other models (p < 0.05), while ChatGPT (mean score/question 2.86 ± 0.94) outperformed Meta and Gemini. Meta and Gemini performed similarly. Meta had a significantly lower FKG than Claude and ChatGPT and a significantly lower FRE than ChatGPT. Conclusion: According to ratings by seven rhinoplasty-specializing surgeons, Claude provided the best answers for a set of complex rhinoplasty consultation questions, followed by ChatGPT. Future studies are warranted to continue comparing these models as they evolve.
{"title":"Comparative Performance of the Leading Large Language Models in Answering Complex Rhinoplasty Consultation Questions.","authors":"Khodayar Goshtasbi, Corliss Best, Bethany Powers, Harry Ching, Norman J Pastorek, Donald Altman, Peter Adamson, Mark Krugman, Brian J F Wong","doi":"10.1089/fpsam.2024.0206","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1089/fpsam.2024.0206","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Various large language models (LLMs) can provide human-level medical discussions, but they have not been compared regarding rhinoplasty knowledge. <b>Objective:</b> To compare the leading LLMs in answering complex rhinoplasty consultation questions as evaluated by plastic surgeons. <b>Methods:</b> Ten open-ended rhinoplasty consultation questions were presented to ChatGPT-4o, Google Gemini, Claude, and Meta-AI LLMs. The responses were randomized and ranked by seven rhinoplasty-specializing plastic surgeons (1 = worst, 4 = best) considering their quality. Textual readability was analyzed via Flesch Reading Ease (FRE) and Flesch-Kincaid Grade (FKG). <b>Results:</b> Claude provided the top answers for seven questions while ChatGPT provided the top answers for three questions. In overall collective scoring, Claude provided the best answers with 224 points, followed by ChatGPT's 200, Meta's 138, and Gemini's 138 scores. Claude (mean score/question 3.20 ± 1.00) significantly outperformed all the other models (<i>p</i> < 0.05), while ChatGPT (mean score/question 2.86 ± 0.94) outperformed Meta and Gemini. Meta and Gemini performed similarly. Meta had a significantly lower FKG than Claude and ChatGPT and a significantly lower FRE than ChatGPT. <b>Conclusion:</b> According to ratings by seven rhinoplasty-specializing surgeons, Claude provided the best answers for a set of complex rhinoplasty consultation questions, followed by ChatGPT. Future studies are warranted to continue comparing these models as they evolve.</p>","PeriodicalId":48487,"journal":{"name":"Facial Plastic Surgery & Aesthetic Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2025-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142985113","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"<i>Invited Commentary on:</i> \"Fellow's Forum: An Online Simulation Bootcamp: Collaboration Between the American Society of Pediatric Otolaryngology and the American Academy of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery,\" by Thurston and Patel.","authors":"David Zopf","doi":"10.1089/fpsam.2024.0370","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1089/fpsam.2024.0370","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":48487,"journal":{"name":"Facial Plastic Surgery & Aesthetic Medicine","volume":"27 1","pages":"42-43"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143371316","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-01Epub Date: 2023-04-12DOI: 10.1089/fpsam.2022.0273
Keon M Parsa, Amir A Hakimi, Tonja Hollis, Sarah C Shearer, Eugenia Chu, Michael J Reilly
Background: Advances in machine learning age progression technology offer the unique opportunity to better understand the public's perception on the aging face. Objective: To compare how observers perceive attractiveness and traditional gender traits in faces created with a machine learning model. Methods: Eight surveys were developed, each with 10 sets of photographs that were progressively aged with a machine learning model. Respondents rated attractiveness and masculinity or femininity of each photograph using a sliding scale (range: 0-100). Mean attractiveness scores were calculated and compared between men and women as well as between age groups. Results: A total of 315 respondents (51% men, 49% women) completed the survey. Accuracy of the facial age progression model was 85%. Females were considered significantly less attractive (-10.43, p < 0.01) and less feminine (-7.59, p < 0.01) per decade with the greatest drop over age 40 years. Male attractiveness and masculinity were relatively preserved until age 50 years where attractiveness scores were significantly lower (-5.45, p = 0.39). Conclusions: In this study, observers were found to perceive attractiveness at older ages differently between men and women.
背景:机器学习年龄递进技术的进步为更好地了解公众对衰老面孔的看法提供了独特的机会。目的:比较观察者如何感知由机器学习模型创建的面孔的吸引力和传统性别特征。方法:开发了8个调查,每个调查有10组照片,这些照片使用机器学习模型逐步老化。受访者使用滑动刻度(范围:0-100)对每张照片的吸引力和男性气质或女性气质进行评分。研究人员计算并比较了男性和女性以及不同年龄层的平均吸引力得分。结果:共有315名受访者(男性51%,女性49%)完成了调查。面部年龄进展模型的准确率为85%。女性被认为吸引力明显下降(-10.43,p p = 0.39)。结论:在这项研究中,观察者发现男性和女性对老年人吸引力的感知是不同的。
{"title":"Understanding the Impact of Aging on Attractiveness Using a Machine Learning Model of Facial Age Progression.","authors":"Keon M Parsa, Amir A Hakimi, Tonja Hollis, Sarah C Shearer, Eugenia Chu, Michael J Reilly","doi":"10.1089/fpsam.2022.0273","DOIUrl":"10.1089/fpsam.2022.0273","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Advances in machine learning age progression technology offer the unique opportunity to better understand the public's perception on the aging face. <b>Objective:</b> To compare how observers perceive attractiveness and traditional gender traits in faces created with a machine learning model. <b>Methods:</b> Eight surveys were developed, each with 10 sets of photographs that were progressively aged with a machine learning model. Respondents rated attractiveness and masculinity or femininity of each photograph using a sliding scale (range: 0-100). Mean attractiveness scores were calculated and compared between men and women as well as between age groups. <b>Results:</b> A total of 315 respondents (51% men, 49% women) completed the survey. Accuracy of the facial age progression model was 85%. Females were considered significantly less attractive (-10.43, <i>p</i> < 0.01) and less feminine (-7.59, <i>p</i> < 0.01) per decade with the greatest drop over age 40 years. Male attractiveness and masculinity were relatively preserved until age 50 years where attractiveness scores were significantly lower (-5.45, <i>p</i> = 0.39). <b>Conclusions:</b> In this study, observers were found to perceive attractiveness at older ages differently between men and women.</p>","PeriodicalId":48487,"journal":{"name":"Facial Plastic Surgery & Aesthetic Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"11-16"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9309468","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}