Mariline Santos, Sam P Most, Ivan Wayne, Sureyya Seneldir, Miguel Gonçalves Ferreira
The objective of this study was to describe the surgeons who have incorporated dorsal preservation (DP) into their practice and their techniques. An anonymous form reviewed by the Evidence-Based Rhinoplasty Research Group board was shared on its Telegram group. The study population was divided into three groups based on their answers: "Preservers," "Mainly Structural," and "Structural exclusively." This study included the answers of 145 worldwide surgeons. DP was more common among plastic surgeons than otolaryngologists/facial plastic surgeons; DP techniques were mostly preferred by surgeons with 10-20 years of experience, while structural techniques were mostly preferred by surgeons with > 20 years of experience; 50.8% of the surgeons who prefer DP techniques use it in more than 90% of primaries; surface techniques (ST) have been more used, mainly by surgeons who prefer structural techniques (p < 0.001). ST were considered more stable (p < 0.001), more predictable (p < 0.001), and shorter learning curve (p < 0.001). Many surgeons using DP still perform structural rhinoplasty. The most cited concern was hump persistence/recurrence. DP rhinoplasty is gaining acceptance, and ST are favored for their perceived short learning curve, stability, and predictability. However, concerns about hump recurrence cause some to continue using structural methods alongside DP.
{"title":"Dorsal Preservation Rhinoplasty-the Perspective of \"Preservers\" Versus \"Structural\" Surgeons.","authors":"Mariline Santos, Sam P Most, Ivan Wayne, Sureyya Seneldir, Miguel Gonçalves Ferreira","doi":"10.1089/fpsam.2024.0141","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1089/fpsam.2024.0141","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The objective of this study was to describe the surgeons who have incorporated dorsal preservation (DP) into their practice and their techniques. An anonymous form reviewed by the Evidence-Based Rhinoplasty Research Group board was shared on its Telegram group. The study population was divided into three groups based on their answers: \"Preservers,\" \"Mainly Structural,\" and \"Structural exclusively.\" This study included the answers of 145 worldwide surgeons. DP was more common among plastic surgeons than otolaryngologists/facial plastic surgeons; DP techniques were mostly preferred by surgeons with 10-20 years of experience, while structural techniques were mostly preferred by surgeons with > 20 years of experience; 50.8% of the surgeons who prefer DP techniques use it in more than 90% of primaries; surface techniques (ST) have been more used, mainly by surgeons who prefer structural techniques (p < 0.001). ST were considered more stable (p < 0.001), more predictable (p < 0.001), and shorter learning curve (p < 0.001). Many surgeons using DP still perform structural rhinoplasty. The most cited concern was hump persistence/recurrence. DP rhinoplasty is gaining acceptance, and ST are favored for their perceived short learning curve, stability, and predictability. However, concerns about hump recurrence cause some to continue using structural methods alongside DP.</p>","PeriodicalId":48487,"journal":{"name":"Facial Plastic Surgery & Aesthetic Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142592155","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Sarah Elhachimi, David Z Liao, Mingyang Gray, Joshua Rosenberg
Importance: Systematic review will improve understanding of nonsurgical facial feminization techniques, which are useful alternatives or adjuncts to surgical gender affirmation. Objective: To determine the effectiveness of nonsurgical facial feminization techniques in patients seeking gender-affirming feminization by reviewing the literature for patient-reported, subjective, and objective outcomes of feminization. Evidence Review: A comprehensive database search was conducted through July 28, 2022. A total of 264 titles and abstracts were screened by two independent reviewers in Covidence. Of all, 48 met the inclusion criteria for full-text review, and 20 articles were included in the final data extraction. Findings: The most described nonsurgical facial feminization techniques were neurotoxins, fillers, and hair removal. Techniques were derived from cisgender cosmetic procedures to achieve feminine qualities. The most common study type was expert opinion or literature reviews. There were only two studies that analyzed measurable nonsurgical facial feminization techniques. Conclusions and Relevance: There is a lack of high-quality prospective research and randomized, controlled trials specific to the transgender patient population that evaluate outcomes, patient satisfaction, or complications. Such studies are needed to inform evidence-based practices.
{"title":"Nonsurgical Interventions for Gender-Affirming Facial Feminization: A Scoping Review.","authors":"Sarah Elhachimi, David Z Liao, Mingyang Gray, Joshua Rosenberg","doi":"10.1089/fpsam.2024.0091","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1089/fpsam.2024.0091","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Importance:</b> Systematic review will improve understanding of nonsurgical facial feminization techniques, which are useful alternatives or adjuncts to surgical gender affirmation. <b>Objective:</b> To determine the effectiveness of nonsurgical facial feminization techniques in patients seeking gender-affirming feminization by reviewing the literature for patient-reported, subjective, and objective outcomes of feminization. <b>Evidence Review:</b> A comprehensive database search was conducted through July 28, 2022. A total of 264 titles and abstracts were screened by two independent reviewers in Covidence. Of all, 48 met the inclusion criteria for full-text review, and 20 articles were included in the final data extraction. <b>Findings:</b> The most described nonsurgical facial feminization techniques were neurotoxins, fillers, and hair removal. Techniques were derived from cisgender cosmetic procedures to achieve feminine qualities. The most common study type was expert opinion or literature reviews. There were only two studies that analyzed measurable nonsurgical facial feminization techniques. <b>Conclusions and Relevance:</b> There is a lack of high-quality prospective research and randomized, controlled trials specific to the transgender patient population that evaluate outcomes, patient satisfaction, or complications. Such studies are needed to inform evidence-based practices.</p>","PeriodicalId":48487,"journal":{"name":"Facial Plastic Surgery & Aesthetic Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142592159","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Forrest W Fearington, Gloria Rodriguez, Nicholas R Randall, Jacob K Dey
Background: Facial aberrant reinnervation syndrome is characterized by aberrant facial muscle reinnervation after facial nerve injury producing facial synkinesis, hypertonicity, and muscle spasm. Objective: To systematically review the surgical treatments for facial aberrant reinnervation syndrome and assess their effectiveness as measured by patient-reported outcomes, physician-graded outcomes, or computer-automated grading systems. Methods: We conducted a systematic review using PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane CENTRAL in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Texts reporting outcomes of any surgical treatment for facial aberrant reinnervation syndrome from 2003 to 2023 were included. Results: After screening, 25 studies with 731 patients were included. Surgical procedures included selective neurectomy (SN), selective myectomy (SM), cross-facial nerve graft, masseter nerve transfer, and gracilis muscle transfer. All surgical techniques and combinations showed significant improvement in at least one clinical outcome measure from baseline (p < 0.05), although one study found no significant improvement. Thirty different outcome measures were used, the most common being the FaCE and eFACE scales (seven studies each). Conclusions: All surgical procedures in this review yield improved clinical outcome measures for facial aberrant reinnervation syndrome, with SN and SM being the dominant surgical treatments. Standardized outcome assessment and more nuanced patient evaluation are necessary to determine the most effective surgical treatments.
{"title":"Surgical Treatments for Facial Aberrant Reinnervation Syndrome: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Forrest W Fearington, Gloria Rodriguez, Nicholas R Randall, Jacob K Dey","doi":"10.1089/fpsam.2024.0147","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1089/fpsam.2024.0147","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Facial aberrant reinnervation syndrome is characterized by aberrant facial muscle reinnervation after facial nerve injury producing facial synkinesis, hypertonicity, and muscle spasm. <b>Objective:</b> To systematically review the surgical treatments for facial aberrant reinnervation syndrome and assess their effectiveness as measured by patient-reported outcomes, physician-graded outcomes, or computer-automated grading systems. <b>Methods:</b> We conducted a systematic review using PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane CENTRAL in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Texts reporting outcomes of any surgical treatment for facial aberrant reinnervation syndrome from 2003 to 2023 were included. <b>Results:</b> After screening, 25 studies with 731 patients were included. Surgical procedures included selective neurectomy (SN), selective myectomy (SM), cross-facial nerve graft, masseter nerve transfer, and gracilis muscle transfer. All surgical techniques and combinations showed significant improvement in at least one clinical outcome measure from baseline (<i>p</i> < 0.05), although one study found no significant improvement. Thirty different outcome measures were used, the most common being the FaCE and eFACE scales (seven studies each). <b>Conclusions:</b> All surgical procedures in this review yield improved clinical outcome measures for facial aberrant reinnervation syndrome, with SN and SM being the dominant surgical treatments. Standardized outcome assessment and more nuanced patient evaluation are necessary to determine the most effective surgical treatments.</p>","PeriodicalId":48487,"journal":{"name":"Facial Plastic Surgery & Aesthetic Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142592162","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Decreased Filler Volumes with Repeat Micro-Liquid Nonsurgical Rhinoplasty Sessions.","authors":"Sami P Moubayed, Michel Khoury","doi":"10.1089/fpsam.2023.0338","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1089/fpsam.2023.0338","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":48487,"journal":{"name":"Facial Plastic Surgery & Aesthetic Medicine","volume":"26 6","pages":"759-761"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142733518","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-01Epub Date: 2023-02-07DOI: 10.1089/fpsam.2022.0379
Alexis B Lyons, David M Ozog, Henry W Lim, Kate Viola, Amy Tang, Lamont R Jones
{"title":"Commentary on: Re: \"The Detroit Keloid Scale: A Validated Tool for Rating Keloids\" by Lyons et al.","authors":"Alexis B Lyons, David M Ozog, Henry W Lim, Kate Viola, Amy Tang, Lamont R Jones","doi":"10.1089/fpsam.2022.0379","DOIUrl":"10.1089/fpsam.2022.0379","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":48487,"journal":{"name":"Facial Plastic Surgery & Aesthetic Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"784-785"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10661103","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-01Epub Date: 2024-08-01DOI: 10.1089/fpsam.2024.0079
Fernando Nakamura, Miguel Gonçalves Ferreira, Gabriel Silva Rodrigues de Oliveira, Helena Hotz Arroyo Ramos, Mariline Santos
Dorsal preservation rhinoplasty techniques can be surface or foundation techniques and respect the philosophy of preserving the osteocartilaginous nasal vault. A spare roof technique (SRT) aims to preserve the upper lateral cartilages through surface techniques. In tension noses with considerable caudal septum deviations, the septal can be repositioned after a low strip of septal cartilage is removed, and the SRT-B is used to reduce the osteocartilaginous hump. This inclusion of the low septal cartilage strip in the SRT-B rhinoplasty is termed as SRT-B3 and builds upon the previously reported philosophy advocated in SRT-A and SRT-B. Correction of moderate deviations of the nasal axis and/or the caudal septum can be addressed with this modification.
{"title":"Dorsal Preservation Rhinoplasty Using a Ferreira-Nakamura Spare Roof Technique B Highlighting the Low Septal Cartilage Strip.","authors":"Fernando Nakamura, Miguel Gonçalves Ferreira, Gabriel Silva Rodrigues de Oliveira, Helena Hotz Arroyo Ramos, Mariline Santos","doi":"10.1089/fpsam.2024.0079","DOIUrl":"10.1089/fpsam.2024.0079","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Dorsal preservation rhinoplasty techniques can be surface or foundation techniques and respect the philosophy of preserving the osteocartilaginous nasal vault. A spare roof technique (SRT) aims to preserve the upper lateral cartilages through surface techniques. In tension noses with considerable caudal septum deviations, the septal can be repositioned after a low strip of septal cartilage is removed, and the SRT-B is used to reduce the osteocartilaginous hump. This inclusion of the low septal cartilage strip in the SRT-B rhinoplasty is termed as SRT-B3 and builds upon the previously reported philosophy advocated in SRT-A and SRT-B. Correction of moderate deviations of the nasal axis and/or the caudal septum can be addressed with this modification.</p>","PeriodicalId":48487,"journal":{"name":"Facial Plastic Surgery & Aesthetic Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"742-747"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141861297","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Brooke Stephanian, Sabin Karki, Kirin Debnath, Mikhail Saltychev, Monica Rossi-Meyer, Cherian Kurian Kandathil, Sam P Most
Objective: To analyze the quality of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) tools developed for facial aesthetic surgery. Data Sources: Medline, Embase, CINAHL, Central, Scopus, and Web of Science databases were searched in February 2024. Study Selection: All original research in adults undergoing facial aesthetic surgery was included. Pilot reports, case reports, case series (n < 5), conference proceedings, letters (except research letters and brief reports), and editorials were excluded. Main Outcomes and Measures: Facial aesthetic surgery procedures employing AI and ML tools to measure improvements in diagnostic accuracy, predictive outcomes, precision patient counseling, and the scope of facial aesthetic surgery procedures where these tools have been implemented. Results: Out of 494 initial studies, 66 were included in the qualitative analysis. Of these, 42 (63.6%) were of "good" quality, 20 (30.3%) were of "fair" quality, and 4 (6.1%) were of "poor" quality. Conclusion: AI improves diagnostic accuracy, predictive capabilities, patient counseling, and facial aesthetic surgery treatment planning.
目的:分析为面部美容手术开发的人工智能(AI)和机器学习(ML)工具的质量:分析为面部美容手术开发的人工智能(AI)和机器学习(ML)工具的质量。数据来源:于 2024 年 2 月检索 Medline、Embase、CINAHL、Central、Scopus 和 Web of Science 数据库。研究选择:所有关于成人面部美容手术的原创研究均被纳入。不包括试验报告、病例报告、系列病例(n < 5)、会议论文集、信件(研究信件和简要报告除外)和社论。主要结果和衡量标准:采用人工智能和 ML 工具的面部美容手术,以衡量诊断准确性、预测结果、精准患者咨询方面的改进,以及采用这些工具的面部美容手术的范围。结果:在 494 项初步研究中,有 66 项纳入了定性分析。其中,42 项(63.6%)质量 "良好",20 项(30.3%)质量 "一般",4 项(6.1%)质量 "较差"。结论人工智能提高了诊断准确性、预测能力、患者咨询和面部美容手术治疗计划。
{"title":"Role of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Facial Aesthetic Surgery: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Brooke Stephanian, Sabin Karki, Kirin Debnath, Mikhail Saltychev, Monica Rossi-Meyer, Cherian Kurian Kandathil, Sam P Most","doi":"10.1089/fpsam.2024.0204","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1089/fpsam.2024.0204","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> To analyze the quality of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) tools developed for facial aesthetic surgery. <b>Data Sources:</b> Medline, Embase, CINAHL, Central, Scopus, and Web of Science databases were searched in February 2024. <b>Study Selection:</b> All original research in adults undergoing facial aesthetic surgery was included. Pilot reports, case reports, case series (<i>n</i> < 5), conference proceedings, letters (except research letters and brief reports), and editorials were excluded. <b>Main Outcomes and Measures:</b> Facial aesthetic surgery procedures employing AI and ML tools to measure improvements in diagnostic accuracy, predictive outcomes, precision patient counseling, and the scope of facial aesthetic surgery procedures where these tools have been implemented. <b>Results:</b> Out of 494 initial studies, 66 were included in the qualitative analysis. Of these, 42 (63.6%) were of \"good\" quality, 20 (30.3%) were of \"fair\" quality, and 4 (6.1%) were of \"poor\" quality. <b>Conclusion:</b> AI improves diagnostic accuracy, predictive capabilities, patient counseling, and facial aesthetic surgery treatment planning.</p>","PeriodicalId":48487,"journal":{"name":"Facial Plastic Surgery & Aesthetic Medicine","volume":"26 6","pages":"679-705"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142733521","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-01Epub Date: 2024-08-22DOI: 10.1089/fpsam.2024.0235
Sami P Moubayed, Michel Khoury
{"title":"Reply to Commentary on: Decreased Filler Volumes with Repeat Micro-Liquid Nonsurgical Rhinoplasty Sessions.","authors":"Sami P Moubayed, Michel Khoury","doi":"10.1089/fpsam.2024.0235","DOIUrl":"10.1089/fpsam.2024.0235","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":48487,"journal":{"name":"Facial Plastic Surgery & Aesthetic Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"764-765"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142037378","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-01Epub Date: 2024-08-26DOI: 10.1089/fpsam.2024.0132
Mattie Rosi-Schumacher, David A Sherris
Background: A novel single-unit septal extension-columellar strut graft was designed to overcome limitations of traditional techniques in rhinoplasty. Objective: To evaluate the outcomes of rhinoplasty utilizing the novel graft, focusing on nasal support, obstruction, and cosmetic results. Methods: A retrospective analysis included patients who underwent rhinoplasty with this graft between 2020 and 2022, with a minimum 1-year follow-up. Pre- and postoperative nasal obstruction symptom evaluation (NOSE) surveys and standardized photographic assessments were employed. Results: A total of 32 patients (mean age 32.8 ± 11.9 years; 96.9% female, 87.5% Caucasian) underwent primary rhinoplasties (68.8% cosmetic, 31.3% functional). Mean follow-up was 13.4 ± 4.9 months (range 12 to 29). Postoperatively, NOSE scores significantly decreased from 34.4 to 4.84 (p < 0.001). Independent reviewers observed improved nasal aesthetics (preop mean 11.96 ± 3.53, postop 1.83 ± 1.6, p < 0.001) without a loss of nasal tip support. No revisions were required. Conclusions: Rhinoplasty using the septal extension-columellar strut graft, in combination with other techniques, provides durable support to nasal tip structures and contributes to improved nasal tip aesthetics.
{"title":"Outcomes Following Rhinoplasty Using the Combined Septal Extension-Columellar Strut Graft.","authors":"Mattie Rosi-Schumacher, David A Sherris","doi":"10.1089/fpsam.2024.0132","DOIUrl":"10.1089/fpsam.2024.0132","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> A novel single-unit septal extension-columellar strut graft was designed to overcome limitations of traditional techniques in rhinoplasty. <b>Objective:</b> To evaluate the outcomes of rhinoplasty utilizing the novel graft, focusing on nasal support, obstruction, and cosmetic results. <b>Methods:</b> A retrospective analysis included patients who underwent rhinoplasty with this graft between 2020 and 2022, with a minimum 1-year follow-up. Pre- and postoperative nasal obstruction symptom evaluation (NOSE) surveys and standardized photographic assessments were employed. <b>Results:</b> A total of 32 patients (mean age 32.8 ± 11.9 years; 96.9% female, 87.5% Caucasian) underwent primary rhinoplasties (68.8% cosmetic, 31.3% functional). Mean follow-up was 13.4 ± 4.9 months (range 12 to 29). Postoperatively, NOSE scores significantly decreased from 34.4 to 4.84 (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Independent reviewers observed improved nasal aesthetics (preop mean 11.96 ± 3.53, postop 1.83 ± 1.6, <i>p</i> < 0.001) without a loss of nasal tip support. No revisions were required. <b>Conclusions:</b> Rhinoplasty using the septal extension-columellar strut graft, in combination with other techniques, provides durable support to nasal tip structures and contributes to improved nasal tip aesthetics.</p>","PeriodicalId":48487,"journal":{"name":"Facial Plastic Surgery & Aesthetic Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"769-774"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142074284","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-01Epub Date: 2024-04-26DOI: 10.1089/fpsam.2024.0027
Myriam Loyo, Natalie A Krane, Candace M Waters, Theda C Kontis
Facial plastic and reconstructive surgery has historically been a male-dominated field. It is critical to assess the current state of female representation within our Society to better gauge how we reflect the changing needs of our community and our patients. Although we have made headway in fostering a community ripe for progress, we must continue to create and promote equal opportunities, dissuade microaggressions, address burnout, and capitalize on the innate strengths of our female constituents. With the data presented in this study, we hope to further illuminate the benefits of women engagement in our Academy while recommending sustainable actions to create a culture of allyship.
{"title":"Women in Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery: The State of the Academy and Why It Matters.","authors":"Myriam Loyo, Natalie A Krane, Candace M Waters, Theda C Kontis","doi":"10.1089/fpsam.2024.0027","DOIUrl":"10.1089/fpsam.2024.0027","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Facial plastic and reconstructive surgery has historically been a male-dominated field. It is critical to assess the current state of female representation within our Society to better gauge how we reflect the changing needs of our community and our patients. Although we have made headway in fostering a community ripe for progress, we must continue to create and promote equal opportunities, dissuade microaggressions, address burnout, and capitalize on the innate strengths of our female constituents. With the data presented in this study, we hope to further illuminate the benefits of women engagement in our Academy while recommending sustainable actions to create a culture of allyship.</p>","PeriodicalId":48487,"journal":{"name":"Facial Plastic Surgery & Aesthetic Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"800-e802"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140870697","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}