Jacc: Cardiooncology最新文献

The landscape of cancer therapeutics is continually evolving, with successes in improved survivorship and reduced disease progression for many patients with cancer. Improved cancer outcomes expose competing comorbidities, some of which may be exacerbated by cancer therapies. The leading cause of disability and death for many early-stage cancers is cardiovascular disease (CVD), which is often attributed to direct or indirect cardiac injury from cancer therapy. In this review, the authors propose that toxicities related to conventional and novel cancer therapeutics should be considered beyond the heart. The authors provide a framework using the oxygen pathway to understand the impact of cancer treatment on peak oxygen uptake, a marker of integrative cardiopulmonary function and CVD risk. Peripheral toxicities and the impact on oxygen transport are discussed. Consideration for the broad effects of cancer therapies will improve the prediction and identification of cancer survivors at risk for CVD, functional disability, and premature mortality and those who would benefit from therapeutic intervention, ultimately improving patient outcomes.

Background

Patients with cardiac tumors may present challenges for surgical resection due to poor clinical condition. Echocardiography-guided transapical radiofrequency ablation for cardiac tumors (TARFACT) potentially offers a less invasive palliative therapy option.

Objectives

This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of TARFACT.

Methods

Five patients with cardiac tumors (mucinous liposarcoma, myocardial hypertrophy with inflammatory cell infiltration mass, fibrous tissue tumor hyperplasia, myocardial clear cell sarcoma, and cardiac rhabdomyoma) were included. All patients underwent TARFACT and were assessed with electrocardiogram, echocardiographic imaging, biochemical analysis, and pathological confirmation.

Results

The median follow-up for all patients was 9 (range 4-12) months. Three surviving patients were alive at their last follow-up (9, 12, and 12 months, respectively), whereas 2 patients with late-stage tumors survived 6 months and 13 months after TARFACT, respectively. After TARFACT, all patients showed significant reductions in tumor size: the mean length decreased from 6.7 ± 2.0 cm to 4.7 ± 1.8 cm (P = 0.007); and the mean width decreased from 5.0 ± 2.1 cm to 2.5 ± 0.7 cm (P = 0.041). NYHA functional class also improved: median (IQR) decreased from 3.0 (1.5) to 2.0 (1.0) (P = 0.038), Peak E-wave on echocardiography showed a mean increase from 64.4 ± 15.7 cm/s to 76.6 ± 18.6 cm/s (P = 0.008), and NT-pro BNP levels had a median (IQR) reduction from 115.7 (252.1) pg/mL to 55.0 (121.6) pg/mL (P = 0.043).

Conclusions

TARFACT is a novel palliative treatment option for cardiac tumors, reducing accessible tumors and improving clinical symptoms in a preliminary group of patients. (Cardiac Tumors Interventional [Radio Frequency/Laser Ablation] Therapy [CTIH]; NCT02815553)

Background

Cardiovascular preventive strategies are guided by risk scores with unknown validity in cancer cohorts.

Objectives

This study aimed to evaluate the predictive performance of 7 established cardiovascular risk scores in cancer survivors from the UK Biobank.

Methods

The predictive performance of QRISK3, Systematic Coronary Risk Evaluation 2 (SCORE2)/Systematic Coronary Risk Evaluation for Older Persons (SCORE-OP), Framingham Risk Score, Pooled Cohort equations to Prevent Heart Failure (PCP-HF), CHARGE-AF, QStroke, and CHA₂DS₂-VASc was calculated in participants with and without a history of cancer. Participants were propensity matched on age, sex, deprivation, health behaviors, family history, and metabolic conditions. Analyses were stratified into any cancer, breast, lung, prostate, brain/central nervous system, hematologic malignancies, Hodgkin lymphoma, and non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Incident cardiovascular events were tracked through health record linkage over 10 years of follow-up. The area under the receiver operating curve, balanced accuracy, and sensitivity were reported.

Results

The analysis included 31,534 cancer survivors and 126,136 covariate-matched controls. Risk score distributions were near identical in cases and controls. Participants with any cancer had a significantly higher incidence of all cardiovascular outcomes than matched controls. Performance metrics were significantly worse for all risk scores in cancer cases than in matched controls. The most notable differences were among participants with a history of hematologic malignancies who had significantly higher outcome rates and poorer risk score performance than their matched controls. The performance of risk scores for predicting stroke in participants with brain/central nervous system cancer was very poor, with predictive accuracy more than 30% lower than noncancer controls.

Conclusions

Existing cardiovascular risk scores have significantly worse predictive accuracy in cancer survivors compared with noncancer comparators, leading to an underestimation of risk in this cohort.