Pub Date : 2025-06-25eCollection Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.1017/gmh.2025.10032
Hervet J Randriamady, Manasi Sharma, Rocky E Stroud, Aroniaina M Falinirina, Romario, Madeleine Rasoanirina, Nadège V Volasoa, Frédéric Déclerque, Marc Y Solofoarimanana, Jean C Mahefa, Hanitra O Randriatsara, Karestan C Koenen, Christopher D Golden
There have been no culturally validated measures to screen for depression in Madagascar. In 2022-2023, we conducted qualitative studies in the Bay of Ranobe area in southwestern Madagascar to understand local mental health syndromes specific to this region. We found that the 8-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-8) shares symptoms with the general distress-like, depressive-like and grief-like syndromes elicited locally. We adapted the PHQ-8 to align with the unique symptoms found in the region that were missing from the measure. We administered the adapted PHQ-8 to 809 participants aged 16 and above. We found that the one-factor (Depression) model (root mean square error of approximation [RMSEA] = 0.046, standardized root mean square residual [SRMR] = 0.053, Comparative Fit Index [CFI] = 0.993 and Tucker-Lewis Index [TLI] = 0.991) had a better fit to our data than the two-factor (Cognitive-Affective and Somatic) model (RMSEA = 0.047, SRMR = 0.052, CFI = 0.994 and TLI = 0.990). The one-factor (Depression) model demonstrated good internal consistency (MacDonald's omega coefficient = 0.81 and ordinal alpha = 0.87). We conducted a multigroup confirmatory factor analysis to establish measurement invariance (MI) across four groups (sex, ethnicity, level of education and age group) and found that all levels of MI were achieved across groups. Our research provides a validated method to assess the probable prevalence of current depression in southwestern Madagascar.
{"title":"Cultural adaptation and psychometric properties of the 8-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-8) to screen for depression in southwestern Madagascar.","authors":"Hervet J Randriamady, Manasi Sharma, Rocky E Stroud, Aroniaina M Falinirina, Romario, Madeleine Rasoanirina, Nadège V Volasoa, Frédéric Déclerque, Marc Y Solofoarimanana, Jean C Mahefa, Hanitra O Randriatsara, Karestan C Koenen, Christopher D Golden","doi":"10.1017/gmh.2025.10032","DOIUrl":"10.1017/gmh.2025.10032","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>There have been no culturally validated measures to screen for depression in Madagascar. In 2022-2023, we conducted qualitative studies in the Bay of Ranobe area in southwestern Madagascar to understand local mental health syndromes specific to this region. We found that the 8-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-8) shares symptoms with the general distress-like, depressive-like and grief-like syndromes elicited locally. We adapted the PHQ-8 to align with the unique symptoms found in the region that were missing from the measure. We administered the adapted PHQ-8 to 809 participants aged 16 and above. We found that the one-factor (Depression) model (root mean square error of approximation [RMSEA] = 0.046, standardized root mean square residual [SRMR] = 0.053, Comparative Fit Index [CFI] = 0.993 and Tucker-Lewis Index [TLI] = 0.991) had a better fit to our data than the two-factor (Cognitive-Affective and Somatic) model (RMSEA = 0.047, SRMR = 0.052, CFI = 0.994 and TLI = 0.990). The one-factor (Depression) model demonstrated good internal consistency (MacDonald's omega coefficient = 0.81 and ordinal alpha = 0.87). We conducted a multigroup confirmatory factor analysis to establish measurement invariance (MI) across four groups (sex, ethnicity, level of education and age group) and found that all levels of MI were achieved across groups. Our research provides a validated method to assess the probable prevalence of current depression in southwestern Madagascar.</p>","PeriodicalId":48579,"journal":{"name":"Global Mental Health","volume":"12 ","pages":"e78"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2025-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12322790/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144790429","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-06-24eCollection Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.1017/gmh.2025.10030
Thach Tran, Hau Nguyen, Jane Fisher
This study aimed to describe changes over time in the prevalence and associated factors of suicidal behaviours among 13- to 15-year-olds in Southeast Asian countries. It is a secondary analysis of cross-sectional data from the Global School-based Student Health Surveys conducted in Indonesia, Myanmar, the Philippines and Thailand in 2007/2008 and 2015/2016. Each survey included a nationally representative sample of students aged 13-15 years. Data on suicidal thoughts, plans, attempts, and associated factors-including health risk behaviours, experiences of physical violence and bullying, social difficulties, and parental supervision-were collected using self-report questionnaires. The population attributable fraction for each risk factor was calculated using multiple logistic regression. The prevalence of suicidal behaviours ranged from 0.7% (Myanmar) to 17.3% (Philippines) in 2007/2008, and from 8.6% (Indonesia) to 20.9% (Thailand) in 2015/2016. Being physically attacked or bullied and experiencing social difficulties were the most consistent and significant risk factors across countries and time points. Female gender, poverty, alcohol consumption, and drug use also contributed to risk at varying levels. Suicidal behaviours have risen alarmingly in several Southeast Asian countries. These findings suggest the urgent need for coordinated action by policymakers, health professionals, educators, and families to prevent adolescent suicidal behaviours.
{"title":"Suicidal behaviours among 13- to 15-year-olds in four southeast Asian countries: Trends and contributing factors.","authors":"Thach Tran, Hau Nguyen, Jane Fisher","doi":"10.1017/gmh.2025.10030","DOIUrl":"10.1017/gmh.2025.10030","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to describe changes over time in the prevalence and associated factors of suicidal behaviours among 13- to 15-year-olds in Southeast Asian countries. It is a secondary analysis of cross-sectional data from the Global School-based Student Health Surveys conducted in Indonesia, Myanmar, the Philippines and Thailand in 2007/2008 and 2015/2016. Each survey included a nationally representative sample of students aged 13-15 years. Data on suicidal thoughts, plans, attempts, and associated factors-including health risk behaviours, experiences of physical violence and bullying, social difficulties, and parental supervision-were collected using self-report questionnaires. The population attributable fraction for each risk factor was calculated using multiple logistic regression. The prevalence of suicidal behaviours ranged from 0.7% (Myanmar) to 17.3% (Philippines) in 2007/2008, and from 8.6% (Indonesia) to 20.9% (Thailand) in 2015/2016. Being physically attacked or bullied and experiencing social difficulties were the most consistent and significant risk factors across countries and time points. Female gender, poverty, alcohol consumption, and drug use also contributed to risk at varying levels. Suicidal behaviours have risen alarmingly in several Southeast Asian countries. These findings suggest the urgent need for coordinated action by policymakers, health professionals, educators, and families to prevent adolescent suicidal behaviours.</p>","PeriodicalId":48579,"journal":{"name":"Global Mental Health","volume":"12 ","pages":"e70"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2025-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12277208/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144683432","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-06-23eCollection Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.1017/gmh.2025.10028
Irja Rzepka-Marot, Nadja Gebhardt, Jonathan Nowak, Bastian Bruns, Hans-Christoph Friederich, Christoph Nikendei
Refugees and forced migrants are particularly susceptible to trauma-related disorders, due exposure to traumatic events before, during or after displacement. In trauma therapy, the concept of psychological stabilization refers to the improvement of a patient's capacity to manage symptoms and emotions associated with traumatic experiences. While exposure-based therapies are widely recommended for treating posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), stabilizing interventions may offer a valuable alternative, particularly given the unique challenges in refugee care. This scoping review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of stabilizing, non exposure-based interventions for traumatized refugees A systematic search identified 31 relevant studies featuring diverse interventions, settings, and outcomes. Most studies showed a significant reduction in PTSD symptoms compared to waitlist (six studies), treatment as usual (three studies) and pre-post analyses (nine studies), though nine studies found no difference between intervention and comparison group. Notably, two studies found the stabilizing approach less effective than the comparison group, and two reported no symptom reduction in pre-post analysis. Heterogenity among the examined interventions as well as living conditions was high and limited the generizability of the results. Further studies should take these environmental factors into consideration.
{"title":"Stabilization interventions in the treatment of traumatized refugees: A scoping review.","authors":"Irja Rzepka-Marot, Nadja Gebhardt, Jonathan Nowak, Bastian Bruns, Hans-Christoph Friederich, Christoph Nikendei","doi":"10.1017/gmh.2025.10028","DOIUrl":"10.1017/gmh.2025.10028","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Refugees and forced migrants are particularly susceptible to trauma-related disorders, due exposure to traumatic events before, during or after displacement. In trauma therapy, the concept of psychological stabilization refers to the improvement of a patient's capacity to manage symptoms and emotions associated with traumatic experiences. While exposure-based therapies are widely recommended for treating posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), stabilizing interventions may offer a valuable alternative, particularly given the unique challenges in refugee care. This scoping review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of stabilizing, non exposure-based interventions for traumatized refugees A systematic search identified 31 relevant studies featuring diverse interventions, settings, and outcomes. Most studies showed a significant reduction in PTSD symptoms compared to waitlist (six studies), treatment as usual (three studies) and pre-post analyses (nine studies), though nine studies found no difference between intervention and comparison group. Notably, two studies found the stabilizing approach less effective than the comparison group, and two reported no symptom reduction in pre-post analysis. Heterogenity among the examined interventions as well as living conditions was high and limited the generizability of the results. Further studies should take these environmental factors into consideration.</p>","PeriodicalId":48579,"journal":{"name":"Global Mental Health","volume":"12 ","pages":"e73"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2025-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12277214/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144683431","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-06-20eCollection Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.1017/gmh.2025.10011
Alethea Desrosiers, Maria Paula Jimenez, Maria Pineros-Leano, Samantha Plezia, Natalia Pineros-Leano
Approximately three million Venezuelan migrants (VMs) currently reside in Colombia. Many are in need of mental health services but face significant difficulties accessing services. To improve service access and engagement, we culturally adapted and pilot tested an evidence-based mental health intervention integrated within entrepreneurship training in a community setting for VM youth in Colombia. Using participatory research and qualitative methods approaches, we explored the program's acceptability, appropriateness and feasibility. We recruited and enrolled 67 VM youth (aged 18-30) living in Bogotá, Colombia, who participated in piloting the intervention. We conducted semi-structured interviews with a subset of these participants (n = 16) at post-intervention to explore the intervention's acceptability, appropriateness and feasibility. Two bilingual research assistants analyzed qualitative data using thematic network analysis. Findings suggested that VM youth viewed the integrated intervention as acceptable and appropriate, noting that it was helpful to have a "safe space" to discuss difficult emotions. They also noted challenges to engaging in the intervention, including transportation time and balancing other life responsibilities with intervention participation. Findings point to the importance of engaging community member participants in the adaptation and testing process of mental health interventions to increase intervention fit with the target population.
{"title":"Acceptability of a culturally-adapted, evidence-based mental health intervention for Venezuelan migrant youth residing in Colombia.","authors":"Alethea Desrosiers, Maria Paula Jimenez, Maria Pineros-Leano, Samantha Plezia, Natalia Pineros-Leano","doi":"10.1017/gmh.2025.10011","DOIUrl":"10.1017/gmh.2025.10011","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Approximately three million Venezuelan migrants (VMs) currently reside in Colombia. Many are in need of mental health services but face significant difficulties accessing services. To improve service access and engagement, we culturally adapted and pilot tested an evidence-based mental health intervention integrated within entrepreneurship training in a community setting for VM youth in Colombia. Using participatory research and qualitative methods approaches, we explored the program's acceptability, appropriateness and feasibility. We recruited and enrolled 67 VM youth (aged 18-30) living in Bogotá, Colombia, who participated in piloting the intervention. We conducted semi-structured interviews with a subset of these participants (<i>n</i> = 16) at post-intervention to explore the intervention's acceptability, appropriateness and feasibility. Two bilingual research assistants analyzed qualitative data using thematic network analysis. Findings suggested that VM youth viewed the integrated intervention as acceptable and appropriate, noting that it was helpful to have a \"safe space\" to discuss difficult emotions. They also noted challenges to engaging in the intervention, including transportation time and balancing other life responsibilities with intervention participation. Findings point to the importance of engaging community member participants in the adaptation and testing process of mental health interventions to increase intervention fit with the target population.</p>","PeriodicalId":48579,"journal":{"name":"Global Mental Health","volume":"12 ","pages":"e71"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2025-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12277201/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144683427","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-06-20eCollection Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.1017/gmh.2025.10027
Mayank Kejriwal
Alcohol consumption among university students poses significant public health challenges, especially in the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) region, where limited research exists. This review aims to synthesize evidence on sociodemographic factors associated with alcohol consumption among university students in ASEAN countries, assess the study quality and identify research gaps. A systematic search across nine databases was conducted in May 2024, using Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcome, Study Design and Timeframe to define the inclusion criteria. Studies were assessed for quality and risk of bias using the AXIS tool. Data on sociodemographic factors were extracted, and random-effects meta-analyses were performed for frequently reported factors. Heterogeneity was measured using Cochran's Q-test and I-squared statistic, and small-study bias was tested using funnel plots and Egger's test. Fifteen cross-sectional studies involving 35,527 participants met the inclusion criteria. Gender, age and parental alcohol consumption were the most commonly studied factors. Male students had three times the odds of consuming alcohol compared to female students, a result robust to sensitivity analysis. Parental alcohol use and older age were also significantly and positively associated with alcohol consumption, with minimal heterogeneity. Most studies were of high quality, although variability in study design and geographic representation limited the generalizability of the findings. Sociodemographic factors such as gender, age and parental alcohol consumption influence alcohol use among ASEAN college students. However, cross-sectional design and limited country representation highlight the need for further robust research to inform policy and interventions.
{"title":"Alcohol consumption among university students in ASEAN countries: A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Mayank Kejriwal","doi":"10.1017/gmh.2025.10027","DOIUrl":"10.1017/gmh.2025.10027","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Alcohol consumption among university students poses significant public health challenges, especially in the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) region, where limited research exists. This review aims to synthesize evidence on sociodemographic factors associated with alcohol consumption among university students in ASEAN countries, assess the study quality and identify research gaps. A systematic search across nine databases was conducted in May 2024, using <i>Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcome, Study Design and Timeframe</i> to define the inclusion criteria. Studies were assessed for quality and risk of bias using the AXIS tool. Data on sociodemographic factors were extracted, and random-effects meta-analyses were performed for frequently reported factors. Heterogeneity was measured using Cochran's Q-test and I-squared statistic, and small-study bias was tested using funnel plots and Egger's test. Fifteen cross-sectional studies involving 35,527 participants met the inclusion criteria. Gender, age and parental alcohol consumption were the most commonly studied factors. Male students had three times the odds of consuming alcohol compared to female students, a result robust to sensitivity analysis. Parental alcohol use and older age were also significantly and positively associated with alcohol consumption, with minimal heterogeneity. Most studies were of high quality, although variability in study design and geographic representation limited the generalizability of the findings. Sociodemographic factors such as gender, age and parental alcohol consumption influence alcohol use among ASEAN college students. However, cross-sectional design and limited country representation highlight the need for further robust research to inform policy and interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":48579,"journal":{"name":"Global Mental Health","volume":"12 ","pages":"e69"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2025-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12231523/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144585349","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-06-18eCollection Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.1017/gmh.2025.10029
Hawa Abou Lam, Hélène Font, Véronique Petit, Salaheddine Ziadeh, Judicaël Malick Tine, Ibrahima Ndiaye, Ndeye Fatou Ngom, Babacar Ndiaye, Daniel Sarr, Dominique Diouf, Nathalie de Rekeneire, Antoine Jaquet, Moussa Seydi, Charlotte Bernard
Group interpersonal therapy (IPT) was introduced to Senegal to treat depression in people living with HIV (PLWH), using a task-shifting approach. Following successful implementation at a tertiary-level hospital in Dakar, we evaluate IPT's acceptability, feasibility and benefits in primary and secondary-level suburban health facilities. We assess the impact of IPT adaptations and organizational changes and identify sustainability requirements. PLWH with depression received group IPT following the World Health Organization protocol. Acceptability, feasibility and implementation aspects were assessed quantitatively and qualitatively following specific conceptual frameworks. Depressive symptoms severity (PHQ-9) and functioning (WHODAS) were measured pre-, post-treatment and at 3-month follow-up. General linear mixed models were used to describe changes in outcomes over time. Qualitative data were analyzed thematically. Of 84 participants (median age: 45, female>50%), 81 completed group IPT. Enrolment refusal and dropout rates were 7% and 4%. Ninety-seven percent attended at least seven sessions out of eight. Depressive symptoms and functioning significantly improved by therapy's end (β = 12,2, CI 95% [11.6, 12.8] and β = 8.5, CI 95% [7.3, 9.7], respectively) with gains being sustained 3 months later (p = 0.94 and 0.99, respectively). Adaptations and organizational changes proved successful, but depression screening and diagnosis communication to patients remained challenging. Emerging needs included a tailored patient care pathway and confidentiality. Participants advocated for depression care integration into HIV services. Group IPT's successful implementation in various ecological and organizational contexts in Senegal indicates high acceptability and feasibility. Sustainability may be enhanced by addressing specific needs at multiple levels (individual, organizational, systemic). A comprehensive reflection on strategies to sustain and scale up group IPT is the next logical step.
塞内加尔引入了群体人际治疗(IPT),使用任务转移方法治疗艾滋病毒感染者(PLWH)的抑郁症。在达喀尔的一家三级医院成功实施IPT后,我们评估了IPT在初级和二级郊区卫生设施中的可接受性、可行性和效益。我们评估IPT适应和组织变革的影响,并确定可持续性要求。抑郁症患者按照世界卫生组织的方案接受小组IPT治疗。根据具体的概念框架,对可接受性、可行性和执行方面进行了定量和定性评估。分别在治疗前、治疗后和随访3个月时测量抑郁症状严重程度(PHQ-9)和功能(WHODAS)。一般线性混合模型用于描述结果随时间的变化。对定性数据进行专题分析。84名参与者(中位年龄:45岁,女性占50%)中,81人完成了IPT组。入学拒绝率和退学率分别为7%和4%。97%的人至少参加了8次治疗中的7次。治疗结束时,抑郁症状和功能显著改善(β = 12,2, CI 95%[11.6, 12.8]和β = 8.5, CI 95%[7.3, 9.7]),改善持续3个月后(p分别= 0.94和0.99)。适应和组织变革证明是成功的,但抑郁症筛查和与患者的诊断沟通仍然具有挑战性。新出现的需求包括量身定制的患者护理途径和保密性。与会者主张将抑郁症护理纳入艾滋病毒服务。小组IPT在塞内加尔各种生态和组织背景下的成功实施表明了高度的可接受性和可行性。可持续性可以通过解决多个层次(个人、组织、系统)的具体需求来增强。对维持和扩大群体IPT的战略进行全面反思是下一个合乎逻辑的步骤。
{"title":"Implementation of group interpersonal therapy to treat depression in people living with HIV: A first evaluation of IPT dissemination in Senegal.","authors":"Hawa Abou Lam, Hélène Font, Véronique Petit, Salaheddine Ziadeh, Judicaël Malick Tine, Ibrahima Ndiaye, Ndeye Fatou Ngom, Babacar Ndiaye, Daniel Sarr, Dominique Diouf, Nathalie de Rekeneire, Antoine Jaquet, Moussa Seydi, Charlotte Bernard","doi":"10.1017/gmh.2025.10029","DOIUrl":"10.1017/gmh.2025.10029","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Group interpersonal therapy (IPT) was introduced to Senegal to treat depression in people living with HIV (PLWH), using a task-shifting approach. Following successful implementation at a tertiary-level hospital in Dakar, we evaluate IPT's acceptability, feasibility and benefits in primary and secondary-level suburban health facilities. We assess the impact of IPT adaptations and organizational changes and identify sustainability requirements. PLWH with depression received group IPT following the World Health Organization protocol. Acceptability, feasibility and implementation aspects were assessed quantitatively and qualitatively following specific conceptual frameworks. Depressive symptoms severity (PHQ-9) and functioning (WHODAS) were measured pre-, post-treatment and at 3-month follow-up. General linear mixed models were used to describe changes in outcomes over time. Qualitative data were analyzed thematically. Of 84 participants (median age: 45, female>50%), 81 completed group IPT. Enrolment refusal and dropout rates were 7% and 4%. Ninety-seven percent attended at least seven sessions out of eight. Depressive symptoms and functioning significantly improved by therapy's end (<i>β</i> = 12,2, CI 95% [11.6, 12.8] and <i>β</i> = 8.5, CI 95% [7.3, 9.7], respectively) with gains being sustained 3 months later (<i>p</i> = 0.94 and 0.99, respectively). Adaptations and organizational changes proved successful, but depression screening and diagnosis communication to patients remained challenging. Emerging needs included a tailored patient care pathway and confidentiality. Participants advocated for depression care integration into HIV services. Group IPT's successful implementation in various ecological and organizational contexts in Senegal indicates high acceptability and feasibility. Sustainability may be enhanced by addressing specific needs at multiple levels (individual, organizational, systemic). A comprehensive reflection on strategies to sustain and scale up group IPT is the next logical step.</p>","PeriodicalId":48579,"journal":{"name":"Global Mental Health","volume":"12 ","pages":"e76"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2025-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12322780/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144790433","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The unavailability of reliable, easy-to-use depression screening tools adapted for Sub-Saharan African children is a significant barrier to the treatment of childhood depression. We thus adapted the Child Depression Screening Tool (CDST) to the South African (SA), Senegalese (S) and Rwandan (R) contexts, as a tool to screen for depression in children suffering from chronic illnesses, trauma and difficulties related to COVID-19, family and community hardships. A DSM-5-based diagnostic interview and the CDST screening measure were administered to 1,001 participants aged between 7 and 16 years. The prevalence of depression ranged between 9.5 and 16.8%. It was more prevalent in youth with chronic illness and those exposed to adverse life events. Older age (R and SA), female sex (S), dislike of school (R and SA) and cannabis use (SA) were also associated with worse depression. Receiver operating characteristic analysis showed satisfactory performance (79-89%) and that sensitivity and specificity were optimized at a CDST cut-point of 5.0. The CDST is a valid tool to screen for depression in the settings assessed. If found to be suitable in other countries and settings, it may offer a clinically sound, sustainable path towards the identification of child depression in Africa.
{"title":"Validation of the Child Depression Screening Tool in three African settings: Rwanda, Senegal and South Africa.","authors":"Sharain Suliman, Jenny Bloom, Naeem Dalal, Eric Remera, Raissa Muvunyi, Mohammed Abdulaziz, Adelard Kakunze, Ismahan Soukeyna Diop, Djena Fafa Cisse, Ndeye Awa Dieye, Britt McKinnon, Mohamadou Sall, Agnes Binagwaho, Soraya Seedat","doi":"10.1017/gmh.2025.10022","DOIUrl":"10.1017/gmh.2025.10022","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The unavailability of reliable, easy-to-use depression screening tools adapted for Sub-Saharan African children is a significant barrier to the treatment of childhood depression. We thus adapted the Child Depression Screening Tool (CDST) to the South African (SA), Senegalese (S) and Rwandan (R) contexts, as a tool to screen for depression in children suffering from chronic illnesses, trauma and difficulties related to COVID-19, family and community hardships. A DSM-5-based diagnostic interview and the CDST screening measure were administered to 1,001 participants aged between 7 and 16 years. The prevalence of depression ranged between 9.5 and 16.8%. It was more prevalent in youth with chronic illness and those exposed to adverse life events. Older age (R and SA), female sex (S), dislike of school (R and SA) and cannabis use (SA) were also associated with worse depression. Receiver operating characteristic analysis showed satisfactory performance (79-89%) and that sensitivity and specificity were optimized at a CDST cut-point of 5.0. The CDST is a valid tool to screen for depression in the settings assessed. If found to be suitable in other countries and settings, it may offer a clinically sound, sustainable path towards the identification of child depression in Africa.</p>","PeriodicalId":48579,"journal":{"name":"Global Mental Health","volume":"12 ","pages":"e68"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2025-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12231306/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144585362","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-06-11eCollection Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.1017/gmh.2025.10023
Mahmoud Hemmo, Aemal Akhtar, Brandon A Kohrt, Gloria Pedersen, Abdul Fattah Alkamel, Chantal Martin Sölch, Alison Schafer, Julia Spaaij, Richard Bryant, Naser Morina
The global challenge of closing the treatment gap highlights the need for innovative interventions. Problem Management Plus (PM+), developed by the World Health Organization (WHO), is an evidence-based brief psychological intervention designed to address this gap by involving non-specialist helpers. In this study, 'non-specialists' or 'helpers' are individuals without formal training in mental health, who have been trained in and have been delivering individual PM+ for more than 1.5 years. To enhance quality in mental health care, especially with non-specialists, WHO and the United Nations International Children's Emergency Fund (UNICEF) have launched the Ensuring Quality in Psychosocial and Mental Health Care (EQUIP) platform, an open-access resource for competency-based training. This study evaluates the acceptability and preliminary utility of EQUIP assessment tools. Thirteen helpers were assessed using the ENhancing Assessment of Common Therapeutic Factors (ENACT) and the PM+ assessment tool, culturally adapted and translated for Arabic-speaking helpers in Switzerland. The results indicate that the EQUIP tools can identify strengths and areas for improvement, provide valuable feedback for training, and thus have great potential for enhancing mental health care quality.
{"title":"Piloting competency assessments for an evidence-based brief psychological intervention with Arabic-speaking non-specialists in Switzerland.","authors":"Mahmoud Hemmo, Aemal Akhtar, Brandon A Kohrt, Gloria Pedersen, Abdul Fattah Alkamel, Chantal Martin Sölch, Alison Schafer, Julia Spaaij, Richard Bryant, Naser Morina","doi":"10.1017/gmh.2025.10023","DOIUrl":"10.1017/gmh.2025.10023","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The global challenge of closing the treatment gap highlights the need for innovative interventions. Problem Management Plus (PM+), developed by the World Health Organization (WHO), is an evidence-based brief psychological intervention designed to address this gap by involving non-specialist helpers. In this study, 'non-specialists' or 'helpers' are individuals without formal training in mental health, who have been trained in and have been delivering individual PM+ for more than 1.5 years. To enhance quality in mental health care, especially with non-specialists, WHO and the United Nations International Children's Emergency Fund (UNICEF) have launched the Ensuring Quality in Psychosocial and Mental Health Care (EQUIP) platform, an open-access resource for competency-based training. This study evaluates the acceptability and preliminary utility of EQUIP assessment tools. Thirteen helpers were assessed using the ENhancing Assessment of Common Therapeutic Factors (ENACT) and the PM+ assessment tool, culturally adapted and translated for Arabic-speaking helpers in Switzerland. The results indicate that the EQUIP tools can identify strengths and areas for improvement, provide valuable feedback for training, and thus have great potential for enhancing mental health care quality.</p>","PeriodicalId":48579,"journal":{"name":"Global Mental Health","volume":"12 ","pages":"e72"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2025-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12277206/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144683430","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-06-11eCollection Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.1017/gmh.2025.10020
Saira Abdulla, Lesley Robertson, Sherianne Kramer, Jane Goudge
Community-based collaborative care (CBCC) is an internationally recognised model of integrated care that emphasises multidisciplinary teamwork and care coordination. In South Africa, community psychiatry has been integrated into some primary healthcare (PHC) facilities. This study examines healthcare providers' perceptions of collaboration and its challenges in various integrated care settings. Three main components of CBCC (multidisciplinary teams, communication and case management) were explored through qualitative interviews with 29 staff members in 2 clinics. In Clinic-1, community psychiatry services operate independently in an outbuilding behind the main PHC clinic ("co-located"). In Clinic-2, these services are fully integrated within the PHC clinic ("physically integrated"). Both clinics had multidisciplinary teams, with various staff members conducting case management functions on an ad hoc basis. The physically integrated clinic (due to shared files, physical proximity and a facility manager with mental health experience) had greater levels of communication between the multidisciplinary team. In contrast, the co-located clinic struggled with poor management, unclear reporting structures and reinforced traditional hierarchies, limiting collaboration between the staff members. Integration does not guarantee collaboration. Improving collaboration between mental health and PHC staff requires clear roles, competent managers, CBCC endorsement from PHC clinicians, sufficient human resources and systematic communication channels, such as case review meetings.
{"title":"Healthcare providers' experiences of community-based collaborative care for serious mental illness: a qualitative study in two integrated clinics in South Africa.","authors":"Saira Abdulla, Lesley Robertson, Sherianne Kramer, Jane Goudge","doi":"10.1017/gmh.2025.10020","DOIUrl":"10.1017/gmh.2025.10020","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Community-based collaborative care (CBCC) is an internationally recognised model of integrated care that emphasises multidisciplinary teamwork and care coordination. In South Africa, community psychiatry has been integrated into some primary healthcare (PHC) facilities. This study examines healthcare providers' perceptions of collaboration and its challenges in various integrated care settings. Three main components of CBCC (multidisciplinary teams, communication and case management) were explored through qualitative interviews with 29 staff members in 2 clinics. In Clinic-1, community psychiatry services operate independently in an outbuilding behind the main PHC clinic (\"co-located\"). In Clinic-2, these services are fully integrated within the PHC clinic (\"physically integrated\"). Both clinics had multidisciplinary teams, with various staff members conducting case management functions on an <i>ad hoc</i> basis. The physically integrated clinic (due to shared files, physical proximity and a facility manager with mental health experience) had greater levels of communication between the multidisciplinary team. In contrast, the co-located clinic struggled with poor management, unclear reporting structures and reinforced traditional hierarchies, limiting collaboration between the staff members. Integration does not guarantee collaboration. Improving collaboration between mental health and PHC staff requires clear roles, competent managers, CBCC endorsement from PHC clinicians, sufficient human resources and systematic communication channels, such as case review meetings.</p>","PeriodicalId":48579,"journal":{"name":"Global Mental Health","volume":"12 ","pages":"e64"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2025-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12231312/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144585352","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-06-11eCollection Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.1017/gmh.2025.10025
John Patena, Deborah Adenikinju, Priyanka Lanka, Tania Hameed, Sumedha Kulkarni, Nana Osei-Tutu, Sophia Zuniga, Christina Ruan, Shivani Shenoy, Diksha Thakkar, Elizabeth Noble, Brian Angulo, Dorice Vieira, Joyce Gyamfi, Emmanuel Peprah
Common mental disorders (CMDs) are a leading cause of burden and disability globally. Approximately 75% of those living with CMDs reside in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), and up to 90% of those needing mental health care do not receive it. The Friendship Bench is a task-sharing mental health intervention delivered by lay health workers (LHWs) that utilizes concepts of Problem-Solving Therapy. The aim of this systematic review is to identify and evaluate the barriers and facilitators to the implementation of research outcomes of the Friendship Bench and understand its systematic uptake to narrow the CMD treatment gap. We conducted a systematic review of articles that reported on the Friendship Bench in LMICs, CMDs, implementation research outcomes, and studies that utilized experimental, observational, or qualitative study designs. We identified articles using medical subject headings and keywords from APA PsycINFO, Cochrane, CINAHL, EMBASE, Global Health, OVID, PubMed/Medline, Science Direct, Web of Science, and Google Scholar in February 2023 and again in December 2023 to capture any additional articles. We screened 641 articles, and a total of 7 articles were included in the final analysis. All studies were conducted in Zimbabwe within the past 8 years, and across all the studies, all implementation research outcomes were reported. There is strong evidence that the Friendship Bench is acceptable, appropriate, and feasible to address the CMD treatment gap in Zimbabwe. Facilitators include that the Friendship Bench is culturally adaptable, utilizes trusted LHWs, and has relatively strong community and political buy-in. Conversely, barriers include a lack of a reliable mental health system, limitations in its ability to treat more serious mental conditions, and mental health stigma. There is an opportunity to explore the application of the Friendship Bench for CMDs in other countries and as a basis for novel task-sharing interventions for other health conditions.
常见精神障碍是全球造成负担和残疾的主要原因。大约75%的慢性疾病患者居住在低收入和中等收入国家,高达90%需要精神卫生保健的人没有得到这种服务。友谊长椅是一种由非专业卫生工作者(LHWs)提供的任务分担心理健康干预,利用问题解决疗法的概念。本系统综述的目的是识别和评估友谊长凳研究成果实施的障碍和促进因素,并了解其对缩小CMD治疗差距的系统吸收。我们系统地回顾了在中低收入国家、慢性病患者、实施研究成果以及利用实验、观察或定性研究设计的研究中报道友谊工作台的文章。我们在2023年2月和2023年12月分别从APA PsycINFO、Cochrane、CINAHL、EMBASE、Global Health、OVID、PubMed/Medline、Science Direct、Web of Science和谷歌Scholar中识别了使用医学主题标题和关键词的文章,以捕获任何其他文章。我们筛选了641篇文章,最终共纳入7篇文章。所有研究都是在过去8年内在津巴布韦进行的,在所有研究中,报告了所有实施研究结果。有强有力的证据表明,友谊板凳是可以接受的,适当的,可行的,以解决津巴布韦的CMD治疗差距。促进因素包括友谊板凳具有文化适应性,利用值得信赖的LHWs,并且具有相对强大的社区和政治支持。相反,障碍包括缺乏可靠的精神卫生系统,其治疗更严重精神疾病的能力有限,以及精神卫生耻辱。有机会探索在其他国家应用友谊工作台治疗慢性疾病,并以此为基础对其他健康状况采取新的任务分担干预措施。
{"title":"Evaluating implementation research outcomes for a task-sharing mental health intervention: A systematic review of the Friendship Bench.","authors":"John Patena, Deborah Adenikinju, Priyanka Lanka, Tania Hameed, Sumedha Kulkarni, Nana Osei-Tutu, Sophia Zuniga, Christina Ruan, Shivani Shenoy, Diksha Thakkar, Elizabeth Noble, Brian Angulo, Dorice Vieira, Joyce Gyamfi, Emmanuel Peprah","doi":"10.1017/gmh.2025.10025","DOIUrl":"10.1017/gmh.2025.10025","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Common mental disorders (CMDs) are a leading cause of burden and disability globally. Approximately 75% of those living with CMDs reside in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), and up to 90% of those needing mental health care do not receive it. The Friendship Bench is a task-sharing mental health intervention delivered by lay health workers (LHWs) that utilizes concepts of Problem-Solving Therapy. The aim of this systematic review is to identify and evaluate the barriers and facilitators to the implementation of research outcomes of the Friendship Bench and understand its systematic uptake to narrow the CMD treatment gap. We conducted a systematic review of articles that reported on the Friendship Bench in LMICs, CMDs, implementation research outcomes, and studies that utilized experimental, observational, or qualitative study designs. We identified articles using medical subject headings and keywords from APA PsycINFO, Cochrane, CINAHL, EMBASE, Global Health, OVID, PubMed/Medline, Science Direct, Web of Science, and Google Scholar in February 2023 and again in December 2023 to capture any additional articles. We screened 641 articles, and a total of 7 articles were included in the final analysis. All studies were conducted in Zimbabwe within the past 8 years, and across all the studies, all implementation research outcomes were reported. There is strong evidence that the Friendship Bench is acceptable, appropriate, and feasible to address the CMD treatment gap in Zimbabwe. Facilitators include that the Friendship Bench is culturally adaptable, utilizes trusted LHWs, and has relatively strong community and political buy-in. Conversely, barriers include a lack of a reliable mental health system, limitations in its ability to treat more serious mental conditions, and mental health stigma. There is an opportunity to explore the application of the Friendship Bench for CMDs in other countries and as a basis for novel task-sharing interventions for other health conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":48579,"journal":{"name":"Global Mental Health","volume":"12 ","pages":"e65"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2025-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12231309/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144585351","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}