Issues in Law & Medicine最新文献

Background: Down syndrome (trisomy 21) is a well-known cause of mental retardation. It can be diagnosed in early pregnancy. Scientists have made great strides in outlining the pathophysiologic mechanisms of mental retardation in Down syndrome. Much less has been published on human therapy. To our knowledge, these are the first published cases of fetal therapy for Down syndrome.

Methodology: Reports of three cases. In all cases, treatment was both biochemical (e.g. nutritional) and educational. In all cases, treatment was both before and after birth.

Results: All children lacked the characteristic faces usually seen in the children with Down syndrome. This suggests a treatment effect before birth. All children had better than expected development.

Discussion: Enhancement of development is proposed as a new therapeutic principle. Developing neurons exchange neurotrophic factors during development when they give or receive stimulation from other neurons. Neurons which receive neurotrophic stimulation survive, and those, which do not, are lost to apoptosis. The developmental therapeutic principle seeks to optimize brain development. Biochemical inputs (neurotransmitters, drugs, hormones, nutrients) and functional stimulation are integrated to optimize the growth and survival of neurons individually; other cells; subcellular organelles; and the brain as a whole. Treatment may be before and after birth, both biochemical and functional. These principles may be applied to Down syndrome, other conditions, and normal fetuses or children.

Previously published: Baggot PJ and Baggot RM (2014). Fetal Therapy for Down Syndrome: Report of three cases and review of the literature. J Am Phys Surg 19(1):20-24.

Residents entering training in the specialty of Obstetrics and Gynecology (OB/GYN) often have misconceptions as to what medical interventions Roman Catholic healthcare institutions prohibit, and why certain restrictions are placed on the provision of reproductive health options that are otherwise legally available to women. The Ethical and Religious Directives for Catholic Healthcare Services, produced by the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops seeks to provide a stable framework upon which reproductive health decisions can be based. However, Catholic healthcare ethics may conflict with secular bioethical assertions that place a premium on autonomous patient choice. Residents training in part or whole at a Catholic institution may feel frustration at what they perceive to be a conflict with current secular ethics paradigms-such as access to abortion, contraception, sterilization, and assisted reproductive technologies. The recent adoption of Clinical Competencies by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME), directs that residents shall be trained to function within the framework of their larger healthcare system ("Systems-based Practice"). This article will first, clarify areas of conflict and convergence between Catholic and secular reproductive ethics, which are unique to OB/GYN training. Next, using the ACGME's new Clinical Competency in Systems-Based practice as a model, a rationale for incorporating Catholic Healthcare ethics into an ethics curriculum for OB/GYN residents will be discussed. Finally, guidelines for faculty tackling the problem of how to teach Catholic Healthcare ethics will be described. Incorporating the rich tradition of Catholic healthcare ethics into the educational curriculum of OB/GYN residency fulfills training requirements while exposing young physicians to a rational decision-making framework in bioethics.

Over the past several decades, prenatal testing for fetal anomalies has become standard across the developed world. Most women who learn of a severe anomaly during pregnancy elect to terminate. The authors reviewed ten studies which examined the psychological sequelae of pregnant women following prenatal diagnoses of severe life limiting conditions. Based on the available data, the authors found evidence that women who abort due to a poor prenatal diagnosis are at higher risk of post-traumatic stress and depression than women who continue with pregnancy. They also found that current practice is to make reactive recommendations for post-abortion care, suggesting a presumption in favor of abortion, leaving alternatives like perinatal hospice inadequately explored. This review critiques that approach, recommending that doctors and patients need to have the best possible information before a decision is made.