首页 > 最新文献

Trends in Hearing最新文献

英文 中文
Prevalence and Characteristics of Veterans with Severe Hearing Loss: A Descriptive Study. 严重听力损失退伍军人的患病率和特征:一项描述性研究。
IF 2.6 2区 医学 Q1 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI: 10.1177/23312165241273393
David R Friedmann, Andrew Nicholson, Colleen O'Brien-Russo, Scott Sherman, Joshua Chodosh

Hearing loss is common among Veterans, and extensive hearing care resources are prioritized within the Veterans Administration (VA). Severe hearing loss poses unique communication challenges with speech understanding that may not be overcome with amplification. We analyzed data from the VA Audiometric Repository between 2005 and 2017 and the relationship between hearing loss severity with speech recognition scores. We hypothesized that a significant subset of Veterans with severe or worse hearing loss would have poor unaided speech perception outcomes even with adequate audibility. Sociodemographic characteristics and comorbidities were compiled using electronic medical records as was self-report measures of hearing disability. We identified a cohort of 137,500 unique Veterans with 232,789 audiograms demonstrating bilateral severe or worse hearing loss (four-frequency PTA > 70 dB HL). The median (IQR; range) age of Veterans at their first audiogram with severe or worse hearing loss was 81 years (74 to 87; 21-90+), and a majority were male (136,087 [99%]) and non-Hispanic white (107,798 [78.4%]). Among those with bilateral severe or worse hearing loss, 41,901 (30.5%) also had poor speech recognition scores (<50% words), with greater hearing loss severity correlating with worse speech perception. We observed variability in speech perception abilities in those with moderate-severe and greater levels of hearing loss who may derive limited benefit from amplification. Veterans with communication challenges may warrant alternative approaches and treatment strategies such as cochlear implants to support communication needs.

听力损失在退伍军人中很常见,退伍军人管理局 (VA) 将广泛的听力保健资源列为优先事项。严重的听力损失给语言理解带来了独特的交流挑战,这些挑战可能无法通过扩音来克服。我们分析了退伍军人管理局听力测定资料库 2005 年至 2017 年的数据,以及听力损失严重程度与语音识别得分之间的关系。我们假设,在听力损失严重或更严重的退伍军人中,有相当一部分人即使有足够的听力,也会有较差的无助言语感知能力。我们利用电子病历和听力残疾自我报告指标对社会人口特征和合并症进行了统计。我们确定了一个包含 137,500 名退伍军人的群组,其中 232,789 人的听力图显示出双侧严重或更严重的听力损失(四频 PTA > 70 dB HL)。退伍军人首次测听听力时的中位数(IQR;范围)为 81 岁(74 至 87 岁;21 至 90 岁以上),大多数为男性(136087 [99%])和非西班牙裔白人(107798 [78.4%])。在双侧重度或更严重听力损失患者中,41,901 人(30.5%)的语音识别得分也较低 (
{"title":"Prevalence and Characteristics of Veterans with Severe Hearing Loss: A Descriptive Study.","authors":"David R Friedmann, Andrew Nicholson, Colleen O'Brien-Russo, Scott Sherman, Joshua Chodosh","doi":"10.1177/23312165241273393","DOIUrl":"10.1177/23312165241273393","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Hearing loss is common among Veterans, and extensive hearing care resources are prioritized within the Veterans Administration (VA). Severe hearing loss poses unique communication challenges with speech understanding that may not be overcome with amplification. We analyzed data from the VA Audiometric Repository between 2005 and 2017 and the relationship between hearing loss severity with speech recognition scores. We hypothesized that a significant subset of Veterans with severe or worse hearing loss would have poor unaided speech perception outcomes even with adequate audibility. Sociodemographic characteristics and comorbidities were compiled using electronic medical records as was self-report measures of hearing disability. We identified a cohort of 137,500 unique Veterans with 232,789 audiograms demonstrating bilateral severe or worse hearing loss (four-frequency PTA > 70 dB HL). The median (IQR; range) age of Veterans at their first audiogram with severe or worse hearing loss was 81 years (74 to 87; 21-90+), and a majority were male (136,087 [99%]) and non-Hispanic white (107,798 [78.4%]). Among those with bilateral severe or worse hearing loss, 41,901 (30.5%) also had poor speech recognition scores (<50% words), with greater hearing loss severity correlating with worse speech perception. We observed variability in speech perception abilities in those with moderate-severe and greater levels of hearing loss who may derive limited benefit from amplification. Veterans with communication challenges may warrant alternative approaches and treatment strategies such as cochlear implants to support communication needs.</p>","PeriodicalId":48678,"journal":{"name":"Trends in Hearing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11311185/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141903312","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Task-Dependent Effects of Signal Audibility for Processing Speech: Comparing Performance With NAL-NL2 and DSL v5 Hearing Aid Prescriptions at Threshold and at Suprathreshold Levels in 9- to 17-Year-Olds With Hearing Loss. 信号可听性对语音加工的任务依赖效应:9 ~ 17岁听力损失儿童在阈值和超阈值水平下使用NAL-NL2和DSL v5助听器的比较
IF 2.7 2区 医学 Q1 Health Professions Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI: 10.1177/23312165231177509
Andrea L Pittman, Elizabeth C Stewart

Hearing aid fitting formulas intended for the pediatric population can differ by 6 to 25 dB in prescribed output across frequency leading to large variations in aided audibility. Children perceive these differences and have expressed preferences that favor more audibility for quiet speech and less audibility for noisy speech. In this study, the effect of variations in audibility consistent with hearing aid fittings for children was examined. Sixteen children and adolescents (9-17 years) with mild-to-moderate hearing loss participated. Hearing aids programed to National Acoustic Laboratories or Desired Sensation Level v5.0a targets were fitted to each participant. Also, separate programs with and without a low-level adaptive gain feature were provided with each prescription. Speech reception threshold (SRT) was measured as well as performance for four suprathreshold auditory tasks that increased in cognitive demand. These tasks were word recognition, nonword detection, multiword recall, and rapid word learning. A significant effect of fitting formula, but not low-level or adaptive gain, was observed for SRT. Significant effects of presentation level, fitting formula, and low-level gain were observed for word recognition. The effect of presentation level was significant for nonword detection, multiword recall, and rapid word learning but no other main effects or interactions were significant. Finally, word recognition and nonword detection increased significantly with audibility while multiword recall and word learning did not. The results suggest that audibility assists with the initial perception of auditory input but plays a smaller role in memory formation and learning.

针对儿科人群的助听器配装配方在规定的频率输出上可能会有6到25分贝的差异,导致辅助可听性的巨大差异。孩子们感知到这些差异,并表达了偏好,即安静的言语更容易听清,而嘈杂的言语更容易听清。在这项研究中,对儿童助听器配件的可听性变化的影响进行了研究。16名患有轻度至中度听力损失的儿童和青少年(9-17岁)参与了研究。每个参与者都配备了符合国家声学实验室或理想感觉水平v5.0a目标的助听器。此外,每个处方都提供了具有和不具有低水平自适应增益特征的单独程序。测量了语音接收阈值(SRT)以及四种认知需求增加的超阈值听觉任务的表现。这些任务是单词识别、非单词检测、多单词回忆和快速单词学习。在SRT中观察到拟合公式的显著影响,而不是低水平或自适应增益。呈现水平、拟合公式和低水平增益对单词识别有显著影响。呈现水平对非单词检测、多单词回忆和快速单词学习的影响显著,但其他主要影响或交互作用不显著。最后,单词识别和非单词检测随着可听性的提高而显著提高,而多单词记忆和单词学习则没有显著提高。结果表明,可听性有助于听觉输入的初始感知,但在记忆形成和学习中起的作用较小。
{"title":"Task-Dependent Effects of Signal Audibility for Processing Speech: Comparing Performance With NAL-NL2 and DSL v5 Hearing Aid Prescriptions at Threshold and at Suprathreshold Levels in 9- to 17-Year-Olds With Hearing Loss.","authors":"Andrea L Pittman,&nbsp;Elizabeth C Stewart","doi":"10.1177/23312165231177509","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23312165231177509","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Hearing aid fitting formulas intended for the pediatric population can differ by 6 to 25 dB in prescribed output across frequency leading to large variations in aided audibility. Children perceive these differences and have expressed preferences that favor more audibility for quiet speech and less audibility for noisy speech. In this study, the effect of variations in audibility consistent with hearing aid fittings for children was examined. Sixteen children and adolescents (9-17 years) with mild-to-moderate hearing loss participated. Hearing aids programed to National Acoustic Laboratories or Desired Sensation Level v5.0a targets were fitted to each participant. Also, separate programs with and without a low-level adaptive gain feature were provided with each prescription. Speech reception threshold (SRT) was measured as well as performance for four suprathreshold auditory tasks that increased in cognitive demand. These tasks were word recognition, nonword detection, multiword recall, and rapid word learning. A significant effect of fitting formula, but not low-level or adaptive gain, was observed for SRT. Significant effects of presentation level, fitting formula, and low-level gain were observed for word recognition. The effect of presentation level was significant for nonword detection, multiword recall, and rapid word learning but no other main effects or interactions were significant. Finally, word recognition and nonword detection increased significantly with audibility while multiword recall and word learning did not. The results suggest that audibility assists with the initial perception of auditory input but plays a smaller role in memory formation and learning.</p>","PeriodicalId":48678,"journal":{"name":"Trends in Hearing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/ac/b4/10.1177_23312165231177509.PMC10236245.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9691097","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Development of the Musi-CI Training, A Musical Listening Training for Cochlear Implant Users: A Participatory Action Research Approach. Musi CI培训的发展,耳蜗植入用户的音乐听力培训:一种参与式行动研究方法。
IF 2.7 2区 医学 Q1 Health Professions Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI: 10.1177/23312165231198368
Joke Veltman, Marjo J M Maas, Cilia Beijk, Adinda Y M Groenhuis, Huib Versnel, Constance Vissers, Wendy J Huinck, Alexander E Hoetink

A cochlear implant (CI) is a prosthesis that allows people with severe to profound hearing loss to understand speech in quiet settings. However, listening to music presents a challenge to most CI users; they often do not enjoy music or avoid it altogether. The Musi-CI training course was developed for CI users with the goal of reducing music aversion and improving music enjoyment. A consortium was established consisting of a professional musician with CI, CI rehabilitation professionals and researchers. Participatory action research (PAR) was applied to develop and evaluate the training experiences, collaborating with 37 CI users during three cycles of eight training sessions, each held over a period of 3 months. Input and feedback were collected after each training session using questionnaires, observations and focus group interviews. Almost all participants (86%) completed the training. After completing the training a large majority of participants reported increased music appreciation, increased social participation in musical settings and a positive impact on general auditory perception. The resulting Musi-CI training programme focuses on music listening skills, self-efficacy, and self-motivation. It consists of exercises intended to strengthen attention and working memory, to improve beat and rhythm perception (with online rhythm exercises) and exercises to distinguish timbre of instruments and emotion in music. A Melody Game was developed to improve pitch and melodic contour discrimination.

耳蜗植入物(CI)是一种假体,可以让严重到深度听力损失的人在安静的环境中理解语音。然而,听音乐对大多数CI用户来说是一个挑战;他们通常不喜欢音乐,或者完全不喜欢音乐。Musi CI培训课程是为CI用户开发的,旨在减少音乐厌恶,提高音乐享受。成立了一个由一名专业音乐家、CI康复专业人员和研究人员组成的财团。参与性行动研究(标准杆数)被应用于开发和评估培训经验,在三个周期的八次培训中与37名CI用户合作,每次为期3个月。每次培训结束后,通过问卷调查、观察和焦点小组访谈收集投入和反馈。几乎所有参与者(86%)都完成了培训。在完成培训后,大多数参与者报告说,他们对音乐的欣赏程度提高了,对音乐环境的社会参与度提高了,并对一般听觉产生了积极影响。由此产生的Musi CI培训计划侧重于音乐听力技能、自我效能感和自我激励。它包括旨在增强注意力和工作记忆、提高节拍和节奏感知的练习(通过在线节奏练习)以及区分乐器音色和音乐情感的练习。开发了一个旋律游戏来提高音高和旋律轮廓的辨别能力。
{"title":"Development of the Musi-CI Training, A Musical Listening Training for Cochlear Implant Users: A Participatory Action Research Approach.","authors":"Joke Veltman, Marjo J M Maas, Cilia Beijk, Adinda Y M Groenhuis, Huib Versnel, Constance Vissers, Wendy J Huinck, Alexander E Hoetink","doi":"10.1177/23312165231198368","DOIUrl":"10.1177/23312165231198368","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A cochlear implant (CI) is a prosthesis that allows people with severe to profound hearing loss to understand speech in quiet settings. However, listening to music presents a challenge to most CI users; they often do not enjoy music or avoid it altogether. The Musi-CI training course was developed for CI users with the goal of reducing music aversion and improving music enjoyment. A consortium was established consisting of a professional musician with CI, CI rehabilitation professionals and researchers. Participatory action research (PAR) was applied to develop and evaluate the training experiences, collaborating with 37 CI users during three cycles of eight training sessions, each held over a period of 3 months. Input and feedback were collected after each training session using questionnaires, observations and focus group interviews. Almost all participants (86%) completed the training. After completing the training a large majority of participants reported increased music appreciation, increased social participation in musical settings and a positive impact on general auditory perception. The resulting Musi-CI training programme focuses on music listening skills, self-efficacy, and self-motivation. It consists of exercises intended to strengthen attention and working memory, to improve beat and rhythm perception (with online rhythm exercises) and exercises to distinguish timbre of instruments and emotion in music. A Melody Game was developed to improve pitch and melodic contour discrimination.</p>","PeriodicalId":48678,"journal":{"name":"Trends in Hearing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10496489/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10294473","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Individual Listener Preference for Strength of Single-Microphone Noise-Reduction; Trade-off Between Noise Tolerance and Signal Distortion Tolerance. 个体听众对单麦克风降噪强度的偏好;噪声容忍度和信号失真容忍度之间的权衡。
IF 2.7 2区 医学 Q1 Health Professions Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI: 10.1177/23312165231192304
Ilja Reinten, Inge de Ronde-Brons, Rolph Houben, Wouter Dreschler

There are large interindividual variations in preference for strength of noise-reduction (NR). It is hypothesized that each individual's tolerance for background noise on one hand and signal distortions on the other hand form this preference. We aim to visualize and analyze this so-called trade-off between noise attenuation and signal quality. Dutch sentences in stationary background noise were processed with different NR strengths. We used an NR algorithm that allows us to separate the positive effects of NR (noise attenuation) from the negative effects (signal distortion). Stimuli consisted of speech in noise with different degrees of (1) background noise, (2) signal distortions, or (3) both (i.e., realistic NR at different NR strengths). With pairwise comparisons, participants chose which stimulus they preferred for prolonged listening. Twelve listeners with mild to moderate hearing loss participated in the study. For all participants, a trade-off between noise attenuation and signal quality was found and visualized. The strength of preference was estimated with the Bradley-Terry-Luce choice model and was different for all individuals but in the same order of magnitude for distortion effects and noise effects. Strength of preference of realistic NR was smaller by a factor of ten. This study used a unique setup to capture the individual trade-off between noise attenuation and signal quality in NR. Disturbance from signal distortions is as important as disturbance from background noise for determining preference for NR strength. Individual listeners differ in their sensitivity to both factors and as a consequence in their preferred NR strength.

对于降噪强度(NR)的偏好存在较大的个体间变化。假设每个人一方面对背景噪声的容忍度,另一方面对信号失真的容忍度形成了这种偏好。我们的目的是可视化和分析这种所谓的噪声衰减和信号质量之间的权衡。平稳背景噪声中的荷兰语句子采用不同的NR强度进行处理。我们使用了一种NR算法,该算法允许我们将NR(噪声衰减)的积极影响与消极影响(信号失真)分开。刺激由具有不同程度(1)背景噪声、(2)信号失真或(3)两者(即,在不同NR强度下的真实NR)的噪声中的语音组成。通过成对比较,参与者选择他们更喜欢哪种刺激来延长听力。12名轻度至中度听力损失的听众参与了这项研究。对于所有参与者,发现并可视化了噪声衰减和信号质量之间的权衡。偏好强度是用Bradley Terry-Luce选择模型估计的,所有个体的偏好强度不同,但失真效应和噪声效应的偏好强度在同一数量级。真实NR的偏好强度小10倍。这项研究使用了一种独特的设置来捕捉NR中噪声衰减和信号质量之间的个体权衡。对于确定NR强度的偏好,来自信号失真的干扰与来自背景噪声的干扰一样重要。个体听众对这两个因素的敏感性不同,因此他们喜欢的NR强度也不同。
{"title":"Individual Listener Preference for Strength of Single-Microphone Noise-Reduction; Trade-off Between Noise Tolerance and Signal Distortion Tolerance.","authors":"Ilja Reinten, Inge de Ronde-Brons, Rolph Houben, Wouter Dreschler","doi":"10.1177/23312165231192304","DOIUrl":"10.1177/23312165231192304","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>There are large interindividual variations in preference for strength of noise-reduction (NR). It is hypothesized that each individual's tolerance for background noise on one hand and signal distortions on the other hand form this preference. We aim to visualize and analyze this so-called trade-off between noise attenuation and signal quality. Dutch sentences in stationary background noise were processed with different NR strengths. We used an NR algorithm that allows us to separate the positive effects of NR (noise attenuation) from the negative effects (signal distortion). Stimuli consisted of speech in noise with different degrees of (1) background noise, (2) signal distortions, or (3) both (i.e., realistic NR at different NR strengths). With pairwise comparisons, participants chose which stimulus they preferred for prolonged listening. Twelve listeners with mild to moderate hearing loss participated in the study. For all participants, a trade-off between noise attenuation and signal quality was found and visualized. The strength of preference was estimated with the Bradley-Terry-Luce choice model and was different for all individuals but in the same order of magnitude for distortion effects and noise effects. Strength of preference of realistic NR was smaller by a factor of ten. This study used a unique setup to capture the individual trade-off between noise attenuation and signal quality in NR. Disturbance from signal distortions is as important as disturbance from background noise for determining preference for NR strength. Individual listeners differ in their sensitivity to both factors and as a consequence in their preferred NR strength.</p>","PeriodicalId":48678,"journal":{"name":"Trends in Hearing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10395179/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9922845","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Classification of Acoustic Hearing Preservation After Cochlear Implantation Using Electrocochleography. 使用电子耳蜗造影术对人工耳蜗植入术后的听力保存情况进行分类。
IF 2.7 2区 医学 Q1 Health Professions Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI: 10.1177/23312165231220997
Leanne Sijgers, Torquil Sorensen, Andrew Soulby, Patrick Boyle, Adrian Dalbert, Christof Röösli, Greg Eigner Jablonski, Volkmar Hamacher, Ralf Greisiger, Dan Jiang, Alexander Huber, Flurin Pfiffner

The objective to preserve residual hearing during cochlear implantation has recently led to the use of intracochlear electrocochleography (ECochG) as an intraoperative monitoring tool. Currently, a decrease in the amplitude of the difference between responses to alternating-polarity stimuli (DIF response), predominantly reflecting the hair cell response, is used for providing feedback. Including other ECochG response components, such as phase changes and harmonic distortions, could improve the accuracy of surgical feedback. The objectives of the present study were (1) to compare simultaneously recorded stepwise intracochlear and extracochlear ECochG responses to 500 Hz tone bursts, (2) to explore patterns in features extracted from the intracochlear ECochG recordings relating to hearing preservation or hearing loss, and (3) to design support vector machine (SVM) and random forest (RF) classifiers of acoustic hearing preservation that treat each subject as a sample and use all intracochlear ECochG recordings made during electrode array insertion for classification. Forty subjects undergoing cochlear implant (CI) surgery at the Oslo University Hospital, St. Thomas' Hearing Implant Centre, or the University Hospital of Zurich were prospectively enrolled. In this cohort, DIF response amplitude decreases did not relate to postoperative acoustic hearing preservation. Exploratory analysis of the feature set extracted from the ECochG responses and preoperative audiogram showed that the features were not discriminative between outcome classes. The SVM and RF classifiers that were trained on these features could not distinguish cases with hearing loss and hearing preservation. These findings suggest that hearing loss following CI surgery is not always reflected in intraoperative ECochG recordings.

为了在人工耳蜗植入术中保留残余听力,最近开始使用蜗内耳蜗电图(ECochG)作为术中监测工具。目前,主要反映毛细胞反应的交变极性刺激反应差(DIF 反应)振幅的降低被用于提供反馈。将相位变化和谐波畸变等其他心电图反应成分包括在内,可提高手术反馈的准确性。本研究的目的是:(1) 比较同时记录的蜗内和蜗外对 500 Hz 音爆的阶梯式心电图反应;(2) 探索从蜗内心电图记录中提取的与听力保存或听力损失相关的特征模式;(3) 设计声学听力保存的支持向量机 (SVM) 和随机森林 (RF) 分类器,将每个受试者作为一个样本,并使用电极阵列插入期间的所有蜗内心电图记录进行分类。在奥斯陆大学医院、圣托马斯听力植入中心或苏黎世大学医院接受人工耳蜗(CI)手术的 40 名受试者接受了前瞻性登记。在这批受试者中,DIF反应幅度的下降与术后听力保护无关。对从 ECochG 反应和术前听力图中提取的特征集进行的探索性分析表明,这些特征并不能区分结果类别。根据这些特征训练的 SVM 和 RF 分类器无法区分听力损失和听力保存的病例。这些研究结果表明,CI 手术后的听力损失并不总是反映在术中的心电图记录中。
{"title":"Classification of Acoustic Hearing Preservation After Cochlear Implantation Using Electrocochleography.","authors":"Leanne Sijgers, Torquil Sorensen, Andrew Soulby, Patrick Boyle, Adrian Dalbert, Christof Röösli, Greg Eigner Jablonski, Volkmar Hamacher, Ralf Greisiger, Dan Jiang, Alexander Huber, Flurin Pfiffner","doi":"10.1177/23312165231220997","DOIUrl":"10.1177/23312165231220997","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The objective to preserve residual hearing during cochlear implantation has recently led to the use of intracochlear electrocochleography (ECochG) as an intraoperative monitoring tool. Currently, a decrease in the amplitude of the difference between responses to alternating-polarity stimuli (DIF response), predominantly reflecting the hair cell response, is used for providing feedback. Including other ECochG response components, such as phase changes and harmonic distortions, could improve the accuracy of surgical feedback. The objectives of the present study were (1) to compare simultaneously recorded stepwise intracochlear and extracochlear ECochG responses to 500 Hz tone bursts, (2) to explore patterns in features extracted from the intracochlear ECochG recordings relating to hearing preservation or hearing loss, and (3) to design support vector machine (SVM) and random forest (RF) classifiers of acoustic hearing preservation that treat each subject as a sample and use all intracochlear ECochG recordings made during electrode array insertion for classification. Forty subjects undergoing cochlear implant (CI) surgery at the Oslo University Hospital, St. Thomas' Hearing Implant Centre, or the University Hospital of Zurich were prospectively enrolled. In this cohort, DIF response amplitude decreases did not relate to postoperative acoustic hearing preservation. Exploratory analysis of the feature set extracted from the ECochG responses and preoperative audiogram showed that the features were not discriminative between outcome classes. The SVM and RF classifiers that were trained on these features could not distinguish cases with hearing loss and hearing preservation. These findings suggest that hearing loss following CI surgery is not always reflected in intraoperative ECochG recordings.</p>","PeriodicalId":48678,"journal":{"name":"Trends in Hearing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10729624/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138812888","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Hearing Thresholds for Unscreened U.S. Adults: Data From the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2011-2012, 2015-2016, and 2017-2020. 未筛查的美国成年人的听力阈值:来自2011-2012年、2015-2016年和2017-2020年国家健康和营养检查调查的数据
IF 2.7 2区 医学 Q1 Health Professions Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI: 10.1177/23312165231162727
Larry E Humes

Hearing threshold levels (HTLs) at 500-8,000 Hz from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2011-2012, 2015-2016, and 2017-2020 were analyzed for males and females ranging in age from 20 to 80-plus years (N = 8,795). HTLs for the 10th, 25th, 50th, 75th, and 90th percentiles are provided for males and females. Equations were generated to describe median HTLs as a function of age at each frequency. The medians generated for this unscreened dataset of U.S. adults were compared to those in Table B.3 of ISO 1999 (2013), which came from analyses of the NHANES 1999-2006 datasets. The ISO 1999 values were found to be slightly higher (worse) at several frequencies. The ISO 1999 (2013) median HTLs were 2 to 5 dB worse at 500 Hz for males and females and 2 to 8 dB worse at 4,000 and 6,000 Hz for males than the updated NHANES estimates. As in prior analyses of NHANES data, HTLs worsened with age, were better for females than males, and were better for Non-Hispanic Blacks than for Non-Hispanic Whites. The latter difference was observed for both males and females, was confined to frequencies above 2,000 Hz, and widened with increasing age.

分析了2011-2012年、2015-2016年和2017-2020年国家健康与营养检查调查(NHANES)中500-8,000 Hz的听力阈值水平(HTLs),研究对象为年龄在20岁至80岁以上的男性和女性(N = 8,795)。男性和女性的HTLs分别为第10、25、50、75和90百分位。生成方程,将HTLs中位数描述为每个频率下年龄的函数。该未筛选的美国成年人数据集生成的中位数与ISO 1999(2013)表B.3中的中位数进行了比较,表B.3来自对NHANES 1999-2006数据集的分析。发现ISO 1999值在几个频率上略高(更差)。与最新的NHANES估计相比,ISO 1999(2013)中位数HTLs在500 Hz时男性和女性差2至5 dB,在4000和6000 Hz时男性差2至8 dB。在之前的NHANES数据分析中,HTLs随着年龄的增长而恶化,女性比男性好,非西班牙裔黑人比非西班牙裔白人好。后一种差异在男性和女性中都观察到,仅限于频率高于2,000 Hz,并随着年龄的增长而扩大。
{"title":"Hearing Thresholds for Unscreened U.S. Adults: Data From the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2011-2012, 2015-2016, and 2017-2020.","authors":"Larry E Humes","doi":"10.1177/23312165231162727","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23312165231162727","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Hearing threshold levels (HTLs) at 500-8,000 Hz from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2011-2012, 2015-2016, and 2017-2020 were analyzed for males and females ranging in age from 20 to 80-plus years (<i>N</i> = 8,795). HTLs for the 10th, 25th, 50th, 75th, and 90th percentiles are provided for males and females. Equations were generated to describe median HTLs as a function of age at each frequency. The medians generated for this unscreened dataset of U.S. adults were compared to those in Table B.3 of ISO 1999 (2013), which came from analyses of the NHANES 1999-2006 datasets. The ISO 1999 values were found to be slightly higher (worse) at several frequencies. The ISO 1999 (2013) median HTLs were 2 to 5 dB worse at 500 Hz for males and females and 2 to 8 dB worse at 4,000 and 6,000 Hz for males than the updated NHANES estimates. As in prior analyses of NHANES data, HTLs worsened with age, were better for females than males, and were better for Non-Hispanic Blacks than for Non-Hispanic Whites. The latter difference was observed for both males and females, was confined to frequencies above 2,000 Hz, and widened with increasing age.</p>","PeriodicalId":48678,"journal":{"name":"Trends in Hearing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/37/4c/10.1177_23312165231162727.PMC10017936.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9515343","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5
Comparing Fixed and Individualized Channel Interaction Coefficients for Speech Perception With Dynamic Focusing Cochlear Implant Strategies. 动态聚焦人工耳蜗策略语音感知中固定通道与个性化通道交互系数的比较。
IF 2.7 2区 医学 Q1 Health Professions Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI: 10.1177/23312165231176157
Benjamin Caswell-Midwinter, Julie G Arenberg

Dynamic focusing cochlear implant strategies aim to emulate normal cochlear excitation patterns by varying the degree of current focusing as a function of input level. Results on the speech perception benefits of these strategies have been mixed. In previous studies, channel interaction coefficients (K), which mediate the relationship between current level and degree of focusing, were fixed across channels and participants. Fixing K without accounting for channel interaction and the current required to accurately stimulate target neurons may elicit suboptimal loudness growth and speech perception. This study tested whether individualizing K improved speech perception relative to fixed-K and monopolar strategies. Fourteen ears of implanted adults were programmed with 14-channel strategies matched on pulse duration, pulse rate, filtering, and loudness. Sentence recognition and vowel identification was measured at 60 dB SPL equivalent in quiet and four-talker babble. On the group level, speech recognition in quiet and noise was similar between strategies. On the individual level, there were participants who benefitted with dynamic focusing strategies for speech perception in noise. Patterns of benefit were generally unclear, beyond associations between focused thresholds, duration of hearing loss, and individual-K benefit. Participants rated dynamic focusing like monopolar in clarity and ease of listening. Almost all participants expressed their willingness to use the strategies in a take-home trial. These results suggest that while individualizing K does not benefit all, there are individuals who benefit, for which the electrode-neuron interface may play a role. Future studies will evaluate acclimatization of dynamic focusing strategies using take-home trials.

动态聚焦人工耳蜗策略旨在通过改变电流聚焦程度作为输入电平的函数来模拟正常的耳蜗激发模式。关于这些策略的语音感知益处的结果是混合的。在以往的研究中,通道相互作用系数(K)在通道和参与者之间是固定的,它是当前关注水平和关注程度之间的中介。固定K而不考虑通道相互作用和准确刺激目标神经元所需的电流可能会导致次优的响度增长和语音感知。本研究测试了相对于固定K和单极策略,个性化K是否能改善语音感知。植入成人的14只耳朵在脉冲持续时间、脉冲速率、滤波和响度上匹配了14个通道策略。句子识别和元音识别在安静和四人说话的牙牙学语60 dB SPL等效条件下进行测试。在群体水平上,安静和噪音环境下的语音识别在不同策略之间是相似的。在个体层面上,有参与者在噪声环境下的语音感知中受益于动态聚焦策略。除了集中阈值、听力损失持续时间和个体k获益之间的关联外,获益模式通常不清楚。参与者认为动态聚焦在清晰度和听力易用性方面与单极聚焦相似。几乎所有的参与者都表示愿意在带回家的试验中使用这些策略。这些结果表明,虽然个体化K并不能使所有人受益,但也有个体受益,其中电极-神经元界面可能发挥了作用。未来的研究将通过带回家的实验来评估动态聚焦策略的适应性。
{"title":"Comparing Fixed and Individualized Channel Interaction Coefficients for Speech Perception With Dynamic Focusing Cochlear Implant Strategies.","authors":"Benjamin Caswell-Midwinter,&nbsp;Julie G Arenberg","doi":"10.1177/23312165231176157","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23312165231176157","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Dynamic focusing cochlear implant strategies aim to emulate normal cochlear excitation patterns by varying the degree of current focusing as a function of input level. Results on the speech perception benefits of these strategies have been mixed. In previous studies, channel interaction coefficients (<i>K</i>), which mediate the relationship between current level and degree of focusing, were fixed across channels and participants. Fixing <i>K</i> without accounting for channel interaction and the current required to accurately stimulate target neurons may elicit suboptimal loudness growth and speech perception. This study tested whether individualizing <i>K</i> improved speech perception relative to fixed-<i>K</i> and monopolar strategies. Fourteen ears of implanted adults were programmed with 14-channel strategies matched on pulse duration, pulse rate, filtering, and loudness. Sentence recognition and vowel identification was measured at 60 dB SPL equivalent in quiet and four-talker babble. On the group level, speech recognition in quiet and noise was similar between strategies. On the individual level, there were participants who benefitted with dynamic focusing strategies for speech perception in noise. Patterns of benefit were generally unclear, beyond associations between focused thresholds, duration of hearing loss, and individual-<i>K</i> benefit. Participants rated dynamic focusing like monopolar in clarity and ease of listening. Almost all participants expressed their willingness to use the strategies in a take-home trial. These results suggest that while individualizing <i>K</i> does not benefit all, there are individuals who benefit, for which the electrode-neuron interface may play a role. Future studies will evaluate acclimatization of dynamic focusing strategies using take-home trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":48678,"journal":{"name":"Trends in Hearing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/f9/fe/10.1177_23312165231176157.PMC10226176.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9682780","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Listening Effort in Quiet and Noisy Environments in the Daily Life of Adults With Hearing Aids: An Extended Version of the Effort Assessment Scale (EEAS). 成人助听器在安静和嘈杂环境下的听力努力:努力评估量表(EEAS)的扩展版本
IF 2.7 2区 医学 Q1 Health Professions Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI: 10.1177/23312165231176320
Mathieu Ferschneider, Annie Moulin

This study was aimed at assessing listening effort (LE) in quiet and in noisy daily life situations, in 481 adults with hearing aids (HAs) and 62 adults with normal hearing, using an Extended version of the Effort Assessment Scale (EEAS). Participants were invited to self-assess their LE in daily life, on a visual analog scale graded from 0 (no effort) to 10. The EEAS's internal structure identified two separate constructs pertaining to LE in quiet and LE in noise, each with good consistency (Cronbach's α > 0.83). A three-factor model explained 12% of the variance of the EEAS scores, with HA experience the most important one, and better ear hearing threshold (averaged across 0.5-4 kHz) and ear asymmetry as the other two factors. The EEAS subscales differed in behavior, with the LE in noise being the most dependent on HA experience, whereas LE in quiet depended more on better ear hearing threshold. In a subgroup of people with 6 months to less than 24 months HA experience, a significant decrease in LE in noise was observed with increasing HA experience (0.26 points decrease per year of HA experience), whereas in a group of people with at least 24 months of HA experience, a small increase in LE in noise was observed. This effect was not mediated by age, nor hearing threshold. The extended Effort Assessment Scale is therefore offering an assessment of both LE in quiet and LE in noise, with different dependence on HA experience and hearing thresholds.

本研究旨在评估481名佩戴助听器(HAs)的成年人和62名听力正常的成年人在安静和嘈杂的日常生活环境下的听力努力(LE),使用扩展版听力努力评估量表(EEAS)。参与者被邀请在日常生活中自我评估他们的视觉模拟量表,从0(不努力)到10。EEAS的内部结构识别出安静LE和噪音LE两个独立的结构,每个结构具有良好的一致性(Cronbach’s α > 0.83)。一个三因素模型解释了12%的EEAS分数方差,其中HA体验是最重要的一个,更好的耳朵听力阈值(平均在0.5-4 kHz之间)和耳朵不对称是其他两个因素。EEAS亚量表在行为上存在差异,噪声中的LE最依赖于HA体验,而安静中的LE更多地依赖于更好的耳听阈值。在具有6个月至少于24个月HA经验的人群中,随着HA经验的增加,噪音中的LE显著降低(每年HA经验降低0.26分),而在具有至少24个月HA经验的人群中,噪音中的LE略有增加。这种影响不受年龄和听力阈值的影响。因此,扩展的努力评估量表提供了安静和噪音的工作效率评估,不同的依赖于HA经验和听力阈值。
{"title":"Listening Effort in Quiet and Noisy Environments in the Daily Life of Adults With Hearing Aids: An Extended Version of the Effort Assessment Scale (EEAS).","authors":"Mathieu Ferschneider,&nbsp;Annie Moulin","doi":"10.1177/23312165231176320","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23312165231176320","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study was aimed at assessing listening effort (LE) in quiet and in noisy daily life situations, in 481 adults with hearing aids (HAs) and 62 adults with normal hearing, using an Extended version of the Effort Assessment Scale (EEAS). Participants were invited to self-assess their LE in daily life, on a visual analog scale graded from 0 (no effort) to 10. The EEAS's internal structure identified two separate constructs pertaining to LE in quiet and LE in noise, each with good consistency (Cronbach's α > 0.83). A three-factor model explained 12% of the variance of the EEAS scores, with HA experience the most important one, and better ear hearing threshold (averaged across 0.5-4 kHz) and ear asymmetry as the other two factors. The EEAS subscales differed in behavior, with the LE in noise being the most dependent on HA experience, whereas LE in quiet depended more on better ear hearing threshold. In a subgroup of people with 6 months to less than 24 months HA experience, a significant decrease in LE in noise was observed with increasing HA experience (0.26 points decrease per year of HA experience), whereas in a group of people with at least 24 months of HA experience, a small increase in LE in noise was observed. This effect was not mediated by age, nor hearing threshold. The extended Effort Assessment Scale is therefore offering an assessment of both LE in quiet and LE in noise, with different dependence on HA experience and hearing thresholds.</p>","PeriodicalId":48678,"journal":{"name":"Trends in Hearing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/b0/4b/10.1177_23312165231176320.PMC10265363.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9689249","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Investigating the Reliability of Pupillometry as a Measure of Individualized Listening Effort 瞳孔测量法作为个体化听力努力测量的可靠性调查
IF 2.7 2区 医学 Q1 Health Professions Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI: 10.1177/23312165231153288
M. Neagu, A. Kressner, Helia Relaño-Iborra, Per Bækgaard, T. Dau, D. Wendt
Recordings of the pupillary response have been used in numerous studies to assess listening effort during a speech-in-noise task. Most studies focused on averaged responses across listeners, whereas less is known about pupil dilation as an indicator of the individuals’ listening effort. The present study investigated the reliability of several pupil features as potential indicators of individual listening effort and the impact of different normalization procedures on the reliability. The pupil diameters of 31 normal-hearing listeners were recorded during multiple visits while performing a speech-in-noise task. The signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) of the stimuli ranged from −12 dB to +4 dB. All listeners were measured twice at separate visits, and 11 were re-tested at a third visit. To examine the reliability of the pupil responses across visits, the intraclass correlation coefficient was applied to the peak and mean pupil dilation and to the temporal features of the pupil response, extracted using growth curve analysis. The reliability of the pupillary response was assessed in relation to SNR and different normalization procedures over multiple visits. The most reliable pupil features were the traditional mean and peak pupil dilation. The highest reliability results were obtained when the data were baseline-corrected and normalized to the individual pupil response range across all visits. Moreover, the present study results showed only a minor impact of the SNR and the number of visits on the reliability of the pupil response. Overall, the results may provide an important basis for developing a standardized test for pupillometry in the clinic.
在许多研究中,瞳孔反应的记录被用来评估在噪音中讲话时的听力努力程度。大多数研究关注的是听者的平均反应,而瞳孔扩张作为个体倾听努力程度的指标却鲜为人知。本研究探讨了几个瞳孔特征作为个体听力努力的潜在指标的信度,以及不同归一化程序对信度的影响。31名听力正常的听者在多次访问时进行了一项噪音演讲任务,记录了他们的瞳孔直径。刺激的信噪比(SNRs)在−12 dB到+4 dB之间。所有的听众在单独的访问中被测量了两次,其中11人在第三次访问中被重新测试。为了检验每次访问时瞳孔反应的可靠性,将类内相关系数应用于瞳孔扩张的峰值和平均值以及瞳孔反应的时间特征,并通过生长曲线分析提取。瞳孔反应的可靠性评估与信噪比和不同的标准化程序在多次访问。最可靠的瞳孔特征是传统的平均和峰值瞳孔扩张。当数据经过基线校正并在所有访问中归一化到单个瞳孔反应范围时,获得了最高可靠性的结果。此外,本研究结果显示,信噪比和访问次数对瞳孔反应的可靠性只有很小的影响。综上所述,本研究结果可为临床发展标准化的瞳孔测量测试提供重要依据。
{"title":"Investigating the Reliability of Pupillometry as a Measure of Individualized Listening Effort","authors":"M. Neagu, A. Kressner, Helia Relaño-Iborra, Per Bækgaard, T. Dau, D. Wendt","doi":"10.1177/23312165231153288","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23312165231153288","url":null,"abstract":"Recordings of the pupillary response have been used in numerous studies to assess listening effort during a speech-in-noise task. Most studies focused on averaged responses across listeners, whereas less is known about pupil dilation as an indicator of the individuals’ listening effort. The present study investigated the reliability of several pupil features as potential indicators of individual listening effort and the impact of different normalization procedures on the reliability. The pupil diameters of 31 normal-hearing listeners were recorded during multiple visits while performing a speech-in-noise task. The signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) of the stimuli ranged from −12 dB to +4 dB. All listeners were measured twice at separate visits, and 11 were re-tested at a third visit. To examine the reliability of the pupil responses across visits, the intraclass correlation coefficient was applied to the peak and mean pupil dilation and to the temporal features of the pupil response, extracted using growth curve analysis. The reliability of the pupillary response was assessed in relation to SNR and different normalization procedures over multiple visits. The most reliable pupil features were the traditional mean and peak pupil dilation. The highest reliability results were obtained when the data were baseline-corrected and normalized to the individual pupil response range across all visits. Moreover, the present study results showed only a minor impact of the SNR and the number of visits on the reliability of the pupil response. Overall, the results may provide an important basis for developing a standardized test for pupillometry in the clinic.","PeriodicalId":48678,"journal":{"name":"Trends in Hearing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43637661","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Predicting Hearing aid Benefit Using Speech-Evoked Envelope Following Responses in Children With Hearing Loss. 使用语音诱发包络跟踪反应预测听力损失儿童的助听器效益。
IF 2.7 2区 医学 Q1 Health Professions Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI: 10.1177/23312165231151468
Vijayalakshmi Easwar, David Purcell, Trevor Wright

Electroencephalography could serve as an objective tool to evaluate hearing aid benefit in infants who are developmentally unable to participate in hearing tests. We investigated whether speech-evoked envelope following responses (EFRs), a type of electroencephalography-based measure, could predict improved audibility with the use of a hearing aid in children with mild-to-severe permanent, mainly sensorineural, hearing loss. In 18 children, EFRs were elicited by six male-spoken band-limited phonemic stimuli--the first formants of /u/ and /i/, the second and higher formants of /u/ and /i/, and the fricatives /s/ and /∫/--presented together as /su∫i/. EFRs were recorded between the vertex and nape, when /su∫i/ was presented at 55, 65, and 75 dB SPL using insert earphones in unaided conditions and individually fit hearing aids in aided conditions. EFR amplitude and detectability improved with the use of a hearing aid, and the degree of improvement in EFR amplitude was dependent on the extent of change in behavioral thresholds between unaided and aided conditions. EFR detectability was primarily influenced by audibility; higher sensation level stimuli had an increased probability of detection. Overall EFR sensitivity in predicting audibility was significantly higher in aided (82.1%) than unaided conditions (66.5%) and did not vary as a function of stimulus or frequency. EFR specificity in ascertaining inaudibility was 90.8%. Aided improvement in EFR detectability was a significant predictor of hearing aid-facilitated change in speech discrimination accuracy. Results suggest that speech-evoked EFRs could be a useful objective tool in predicting hearing aid benefit in children with hearing loss.

脑电图可以作为一种客观的工具来评估发育不良无法参加听力测试的婴儿的助听器益处。我们研究了言语诱发包络跟随反应(EFRs),一种基于脑电图的测量方法,是否可以预测轻度至重度永久性(主要是感音神经性)听力损失儿童使用助听器后听力的改善。在18名儿童中,EFR是由六种男性口语带限音素刺激引起的——/u/和/i/的第一共振峰,/u/和/i/的第二和更高共振峰,以及摩擦音/s/和/õ/——一起表示为/suõi/。当在非辅助条件下使用插入式耳机和在辅助条件下单独安装助听器时,在55、65和75dB SPL下呈现/suõi/时,在顶点和颈背之间记录EFR。EFR振幅和可检测性随着助听器的使用而改善,EFR振幅的改善程度取决于无辅助和辅助条件下行为阈值的变化程度。EFR的可检测性主要受可听性的影响;较高的感觉水平刺激具有增加的检测概率。在辅助条件下(82.1%)预测听觉的总体EFR敏感性显著高于非辅助条件下的(66.5%),并且不随刺激或频率的变化而变化。EFR在确定听不清方面的特异性为90.8%。EFR可检测性的辅助提高是助听器促进语音辨别准确性变化的重要预测因素。结果表明,语音诱发EFR可能是预测听力损失儿童助听器益处的有用客观工具。
{"title":"Predicting Hearing aid Benefit Using Speech-Evoked Envelope Following Responses in Children With Hearing Loss.","authors":"Vijayalakshmi Easwar,&nbsp;David Purcell,&nbsp;Trevor Wright","doi":"10.1177/23312165231151468","DOIUrl":"10.1177/23312165231151468","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Electroencephalography could serve as an objective tool to evaluate hearing aid benefit in infants who are developmentally unable to participate in hearing tests. We investigated whether speech-evoked envelope following responses (EFRs), a type of electroencephalography-based measure, could predict improved audibility with the use of a hearing aid in children with mild-to-severe permanent, mainly sensorineural, hearing loss. In 18 children, EFRs were elicited by six male-spoken band-limited phonemic stimuli--the first formants of /u/ and /i/, the second and higher formants of /u/ and /i/, and the fricatives /s/ and /∫/--presented together as /su∫i/. EFRs were recorded between the vertex and nape, when /su∫i/ was presented at 55, 65, and 75 dB SPL using insert earphones in unaided conditions and individually fit hearing aids in aided conditions. EFR amplitude and detectability improved with the use of a hearing aid, and the degree of improvement in EFR amplitude was dependent on the extent of change in behavioral thresholds between unaided and aided conditions. EFR detectability was primarily influenced by audibility; higher sensation level stimuli had an increased probability of detection. Overall EFR sensitivity in predicting audibility was significantly higher in aided (82.1%) than unaided conditions (66.5%) and did not vary as a function of stimulus or frequency. EFR specificity in ascertaining inaudibility was 90.8%. Aided improvement in EFR detectability was a significant predictor of hearing aid-facilitated change in speech discrimination accuracy. Results suggest that speech-evoked EFRs could be a useful objective tool in predicting hearing aid benefit in children with hearing loss.</p>","PeriodicalId":48678,"journal":{"name":"Trends in Hearing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/d2/3f/10.1177_23312165231151468.PMC10034298.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9566751","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
期刊
Trends in Hearing
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1