Pub Date : 2024-03-15eCollection Date: 2024-02-01DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-1780513
Stephen W P Kemp
{"title":"Michigan Special Issue: 60 Years of Michigan Plastic Surgery.","authors":"Stephen W P Kemp","doi":"10.1055/s-0044-1780513","DOIUrl":"10.1055/s-0044-1780513","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":48687,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in Plastic Surgery","volume":"38 1","pages":"2"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10942832/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140144399","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Heather R. Burns, Alexandra McLennan, Erica Y. Xue, Jessie Z. Yu, Jesse C. Selber
Microsurgery has changed the ability to perform highly precise and technical surgeries through the utilization of high-powered microscopes and specialized instruments to manipulate and repair anatomical structures as small as a few millimeters. Since the first human trials of robotic-assisted microsurgery in 2006, the expansion of microsurgery to supermicrosurgery (luminal diameter less than 1 mm) has enabled successful repair of previously inaccessible structures. Surgical robotic systems can offer two distinct operative advantages: (1) minimal access surgery—by entering body cavities through ports, flap harvest can be redesigned to affect a minimally invasive approach for flaps such as the rectus abdominis muscle, the latissimus flap, and the deep inferior epigastric perforator flap; and (2) precision—by eliminating physiologic tremor, improving ergonomics, increasing accessibility to difficult spaces, and providing motion scaling, precision is significantly enhanced. Robotic-assisted microsurgery is a promising application of robotics for the plastic surgeon and has played an important role in flap harvest, head and neck reconstruction, nerve reconstruction, gender-affirming surgery, and lymphatic reconstruction—all the while minimizing surgical morbidity. This article aims to review the history, technology, and application of microsurgery and supermicrosurgery in plastic surgery.
{"title":"Robotics in Microsurgery and Supermicrosurgery","authors":"Heather R. Burns, Alexandra McLennan, Erica Y. Xue, Jessie Z. Yu, Jesse C. Selber","doi":"10.1055/s-0043-1771506","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1771506","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Microsurgery has changed the ability to perform highly precise and technical surgeries through the utilization of high-powered microscopes and specialized instruments to manipulate and repair anatomical structures as small as a few millimeters. Since the first human trials of robotic-assisted microsurgery in 2006, the expansion of microsurgery to supermicrosurgery (luminal diameter less than 1 mm) has enabled successful repair of previously inaccessible structures. Surgical robotic systems can offer two distinct operative advantages: (1) minimal access surgery—by entering body cavities through ports, flap harvest can be redesigned to affect a minimally invasive approach for flaps such as the rectus abdominis muscle, the latissimus flap, and the deep inferior epigastric perforator flap; and (2) precision—by eliminating physiologic tremor, improving ergonomics, increasing accessibility to difficult spaces, and providing motion scaling, precision is significantly enhanced. Robotic-assisted microsurgery is a promising application of robotics for the plastic surgeon and has played an important role in flap harvest, head and neck reconstruction, nerve reconstruction, gender-affirming surgery, and lymphatic reconstruction—all the while minimizing surgical morbidity. This article aims to review the history, technology, and application of microsurgery and supermicrosurgery in plastic surgery.</p> ","PeriodicalId":48687,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in Plastic Surgery","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2024-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140033106","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-03-04eCollection Date: 2023-08-01DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1774303
Jessie Z Yu, Jesse C Selber
{"title":"Applications for Robotic Surgery within Lymphedema, Pelvic Recon, and Breast.","authors":"Jessie Z Yu, Jesse C Selber","doi":"10.1055/s-0043-1774303","DOIUrl":"10.1055/s-0043-1774303","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":48687,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in Plastic Surgery","volume":"37 3","pages":"156"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10911886/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140041280","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-03-04eCollection Date: 2023-08-01DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1771534
Edward P Buchanan
{"title":"Jessie Z. Yu, MD, and Jesse C. Selber, MD.","authors":"Edward P Buchanan","doi":"10.1055/s-0043-1771534","DOIUrl":"10.1055/s-0043-1771534","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":48687,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in Plastic Surgery","volume":"37 3","pages":"155"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10911885/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140041281","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Dominic Alessio-Bilowus, Alexandra O. Luby, Samantha Cooley, Sarah Evilsizer, Elizabeth Seese, Mark Bicket, Jennifer F. Waljee
Although substantial attention has been given to opioid prescribing in the United States, opioid-related mortality continues to climb due to the rising incidence and prevalence of opioid use disorder. Perioperative care has an important role in the consideration of opioid prescribing and the care of individuals at risk for poor postoperative pain- and opioid-related outcomes. Opioids are effective for acute pain management and commonly prescribed for postoperative pain. However, failure to align prescribing with patient need can result in overprescribing and exacerbate the flow of unused opioids into communities. Conversely, underprescribing can result in the undertreatment of pain, complicating recovery and impairing well-being after surgery. Optimizing pain management can be particularly challenging for individuals who are previously exposed to opioids or have critical risk factors, including opioid use disorder. In this review, we will explore the role of perioperative care in the broader context of the opioid epidemic in the United States, and provide considerations for a multidisciplinary, comprehensive approach to perioperative pain management and optimal opioid stewardship.
{"title":"Perioperative Opioid-Related Harms: Opportunities to Minimize Risk","authors":"Dominic Alessio-Bilowus, Alexandra O. Luby, Samantha Cooley, Sarah Evilsizer, Elizabeth Seese, Mark Bicket, Jennifer F. Waljee","doi":"10.1055/s-0043-1778043","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1778043","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Although substantial attention has been given to opioid prescribing in the United States, opioid-related mortality continues to climb due to the rising incidence and prevalence of opioid use disorder. Perioperative care has an important role in the consideration of opioid prescribing and the care of individuals at risk for poor postoperative pain- and opioid-related outcomes. Opioids are effective for acute pain management and commonly prescribed for postoperative pain. However, failure to align prescribing with patient need can result in overprescribing and exacerbate the flow of unused opioids into communities. Conversely, underprescribing can result in the undertreatment of pain, complicating recovery and impairing well-being after surgery. Optimizing pain management can be particularly challenging for individuals who are previously exposed to opioids or have critical risk factors, including opioid use disorder. In this review, we will explore the role of perioperative care in the broader context of the opioid epidemic in the United States, and provide considerations for a multidisciplinary, comprehensive approach to perioperative pain management and optimal opioid stewardship.</p> ","PeriodicalId":48687,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in Plastic Surgery","volume":"36 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2024-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139902383","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Research is an integral part of medical progress that leads to better understanding of disease processes and the development of therapies to improve patient care. The medical community has an obligation and societal responsibility to review its practices and advance its knowledge to optimize care for those who entrust it with their health and well-being. While ultimately intended to benefit patients specifically and society as a whole, every laboratory and clinical investigation inherently carries an element of uncertainty and has attendant risks. These can have unintended and, at times, harmful consequences that cannot justify the knowledge gained. In order to mitigate these risks and protect human subjects involved in clinical research studies, a basic framework of ethical principles has been developed to guide responsible experimental design, execution, and data dissemination. This article provides a review of these principles and the historical context from which they were derived and explores the persistent challenges and cognitive biases that can increase susceptibility to unethical research practices.
{"title":"Ethical Principles in Plastic Surgery Research","authors":"","doi":"10.1055/s-0043-1778045","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1778045","url":null,"abstract":"Research is an integral part of medical progress that leads to better understanding of disease processes and the development of therapies to improve patient care. The medical community has an obligation and societal responsibility to review its practices and advance its knowledge to optimize care for those who entrust it with their health and well-being. While ultimately intended to benefit patients specifically and society as a whole, every laboratory and clinical investigation inherently carries an element of uncertainty and has attendant risks. These can have unintended and, at times, harmful consequences that cannot justify the knowledge gained. In order to mitigate these risks and protect human subjects involved in clinical research studies, a basic framework of ethical principles has been developed to guide responsible experimental design, execution, and data dissemination. This article provides a review of these principles and the historical context from which they were derived and explores the persistent challenges and cognitive biases that can increase susceptibility to unethical research practices.","PeriodicalId":48687,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in Plastic Surgery","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2024-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139751561","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Limb amputations can be devastating and significantly affect an individual's independence, leading to functional and psychosocial challenges in nearly 2 million people in the United States alone. Over the past decade, robotic devices driven by neural signals such as neuroprostheses have shown great potential to restore the lost function of limbs, allowing amputees to regain movement and sensation. However, current neuroprosthetic interfaces have challenges in both signal quality and long-term stability. To overcome these limitations and work toward creating bionic limbs, the Neuromuscular Laboratory at University of Michigan Plastic Surgery has developed the Regenerative Peripheral Nerve Interface (RPNI). This surgical construct embeds a transected peripheral nerve into a free muscle graft, effectively amplifying small peripheral nerve signals to provide enhanced control signals for a neuroprosthetic limb. Furthermore, the RPNI has the potential to provide sensory feedback to the user and facilitate neuroprosthesis embodiment. This review focuses on the animal studies and clinical trials of the RPNI to recapitulate the promising trajectory toward neurobionics where the boundary between an artificial device and the human body becomes indistinct. This paper also sheds light on the prospects of the improvement and dissemination of the RPNI technology.
{"title":"Merging Humans and Neuroprosthetics through Regenerative Peripheral Nerve Interfaces","authors":"","doi":"10.1055/s-0044-1779028","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0044-1779028","url":null,"abstract":"Limb amputations can be devastating and significantly affect an individual's independence, leading to functional and psychosocial challenges in nearly 2 million people in the United States alone. Over the past decade, robotic devices driven by neural signals such as neuroprostheses have shown great potential to restore the lost function of limbs, allowing amputees to regain movement and sensation. However, current neuroprosthetic interfaces have challenges in both signal quality and long-term stability. To overcome these limitations and work toward creating bionic limbs, the Neuromuscular Laboratory at University of Michigan Plastic Surgery has developed the Regenerative Peripheral Nerve Interface (RPNI). This surgical construct embeds a transected peripheral nerve into a free muscle graft, effectively amplifying small peripheral nerve signals to provide enhanced control signals for a neuroprosthetic limb. Furthermore, the RPNI has the potential to provide sensory feedback to the user and facilitate neuroprosthesis embodiment. This review focuses on the animal studies and clinical trials of the RPNI to recapitulate the promising trajectory toward neurobionics where the boundary between an artificial device and the human body becomes indistinct. This paper also sheds light on the prospects of the improvement and dissemination of the RPNI technology.","PeriodicalId":48687,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in Plastic Surgery","volume":"24 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2024-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139751568","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Ipek Berberoglu, Katherine L. Burke, Robert H. Gilman, Steven Kasten, Paul S. Cederna, Stephen W.P. Kemp
In 1964, the Section of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery at the University of Michigan opened its doors to future surgeons and leaders in the field. Today, we are celebrating the 60-year history of the program and its significant contributions to the field. Beginning under the leadership of Reed O. Dingman, MD, DDS, the program began with three faculty members and two independent surgical residents. Since that time, it has expanded dramatically to include 24 faculty members and 28 integrated plastic surgery residents. The goals of the program have always been to achieve excellence in all three of our academic missions including clinical care, teaching, and research. Annually, the program sees an average of 35,000 outpatient clinic visits, 4,000 major operations, 200 peer-reviewed publications, $5,000,000 in research spending, and residents who are well trained and highly competitive for fellowships of their choosing every single year. Through scientific collaborations, academic exchanges, and medical missions, the program's influence has spread beyond Michigan, reaching the entire world. In addition to training world-renowned surgeons, Michigan's faculty and graduates have assumed leadership roles in prestigious professional organizations, scientific journals, and research foundations. In this article, we explore the roots of the program and reflect on six decades of impact, innovation, and inspiration.
{"title":"60 Years of Michigan Plastic Surgery","authors":"Ipek Berberoglu, Katherine L. Burke, Robert H. Gilman, Steven Kasten, Paul S. Cederna, Stephen W.P. Kemp","doi":"10.1055/s-0043-1778035","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1778035","url":null,"abstract":"<p>In 1964, the Section of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery at the University of Michigan opened its doors to future surgeons and leaders in the field. Today, we are celebrating the 60-year history of the program and its significant contributions to the field. Beginning under the leadership of Reed O. Dingman, MD, DDS, the program began with three faculty members and two independent surgical residents. Since that time, it has expanded dramatically to include 24 faculty members and 28 integrated plastic surgery residents. The goals of the program have always been to achieve excellence in all three of our academic missions including clinical care, teaching, and research. Annually, the program sees an average of 35,000 outpatient clinic visits, 4,000 major operations, 200 peer-reviewed publications, $5,000,000 in research spending, and residents who are well trained and highly competitive for fellowships of their choosing every single year. Through scientific collaborations, academic exchanges, and medical missions, the program's influence has spread beyond Michigan, reaching the entire world. In addition to training world-renowned surgeons, Michigan's faculty and graduates have assumed leadership roles in prestigious professional organizations, scientific journals, and research foundations. In this article, we explore the roots of the program and reflect on six decades of impact, innovation, and inspiration.</p> ","PeriodicalId":48687,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in Plastic Surgery","volume":"24 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2024-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139751541","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Jennifer C. Lee, Stephen W.P. Kemp, Theodore A. Kung
Chronic pain resulting from peripheral nerve injury remains a common issue in the United States and affects 7 to 10% of the population. Regenerative Peripheral Nerve Interface (RPNI) surgery is an innovative surgical procedure designed to treat posttraumatic neuropathic pain, particularly when a symptomatic neuroma is present on clinical exam. RPNI surgery involves implantation of a transected peripheral nerve into an autologous free muscle graft to provide denervated targets to regenerating axons. RPNI surgery has been found in animal and human studies to be highly effective in addressing postamputation pain. While most studies have reported its uses in the amputation patient population for the treatment of neuroma and phantom limb pain, RPNI surgery has recently been used to address refractory headache, postmastectomy pain, and painful donor sites from the harvest of neurotized flaps. This review summarizes the current understanding of RPNI surgery for the treatment of chronic neuropathic pain.
{"title":"Regenerative Peripheral Nerve Interface Surgery for the Management of Chronic Posttraumatic Neuropathic Pain","authors":"Jennifer C. Lee, Stephen W.P. Kemp, Theodore A. Kung","doi":"10.1055/s-0043-1778078","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1778078","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Chronic pain resulting from peripheral nerve injury remains a common issue in the United States and affects 7 to 10% of the population. Regenerative Peripheral Nerve Interface (RPNI) surgery is an innovative surgical procedure designed to treat posttraumatic neuropathic pain, particularly when a symptomatic neuroma is present on clinical exam. RPNI surgery involves implantation of a transected peripheral nerve into an autologous free muscle graft to provide denervated targets to regenerating axons. RPNI surgery has been found in animal and human studies to be highly effective in addressing postamputation pain. While most studies have reported its uses in the amputation patient population for the treatment of neuroma and phantom limb pain, RPNI surgery has recently been used to address refractory headache, postmastectomy pain, and painful donor sites from the harvest of neurotized flaps. This review summarizes the current understanding of RPNI surgery for the treatment of chronic neuropathic pain.</p> ","PeriodicalId":48687,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in Plastic Surgery","volume":"136 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2024-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139508487","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Melissa Daniel, Nathan Sheppard, Garrison Carlos, Noah Nelson, Alex Donneys, Steven R. Buchman
In the setting of bone defects, the injured vasculature and loss of hemodynamic inflow leads to hematoma formation and low oxygen tension which stimulates vascular expansion through the HIf-1α pathway. Most importantly, this pathway upregulates sprouting of type H vessels (CD31hiEmcnhi vessels). H vessels engage in direct interaction with perivascular osteoprogenitor cells (OPCs), osteoblasts, and preosteoclasts of bone formation and remodeling. This angiogenic-osteogenic coupling leads to synchronous propagation of vascular and bony tissue for regenerative healing. A growing body of literature demonstrates that H vessels constitute a large portion of bone's innate capacity for osteogenic healing. We believe that CD31hiEmcnhi vessels play a role in bone healing during distraction osteogenesis (DO). DO is a procedure that utilizes traction forces to facilitate induction of endogenous bone formation and regeneration of surrounding soft tissues such as skin, muscle, tendon, and neurovascular structures. While the H vessel response to mechanical injury is adequate to facilitate healing in normal healthy tissue, it remains inadequate to overcome the devastation of radiation. We posit that the destruction of CD31hiEmcnhi vessels plays a role in precluding DO's effectiveness in irradiated bone defect healing. We aim, therefore, to recapitulate the normal pathway of bony healing by utilizing the regenerative capacity of H vessels. We hypothesize that using localized application of deferoxamine (DFO) will enhance the H vessel-mediated vasculogenic response to radiation damage and ultimately enable osteogenic healing during DO. This discovery could potentially be exploited by developing translational therapeutics to hopefully accelerate bone formation and shorten the DO consolidation period, thereby potentially expanding DO's utilization in irradiated bone healing.
Sprague–Dawley rats were divided into three groups: DO, radiation with DO (xDO), and radiation with DO and DFO implantation (xDODFO). Experimental groups received 35 Gy of radiation. All groups underwent DO. The treatment group received injections into the osteotomy site, every other day, beginning on postoperative day (POD) 4 of DFO. Animals were sacrificed on POD 40. For immunohistochemical analysis, mandibles were dissected and fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 48 hours, decalcified in Cal-Ex II for 2 days, dehydrated through graded ethanol of increasing concentration, and then embedded in paraffin. Samples were cut into 7-μm thick longitudinally oriented sections including the metaphysis and diaphysis. CD31 and Emcn double immunofluorescent staining were performed to evaluate the extent of CD31hiEmcnhi vessel formation. Bone sections were then stained with conjugated antibodies overnight at 4°C. Nuclei were stained with Hoechst. Slides were also double stained with Osterix and CD31 to study the quantity of H vessel-mediated recruitment of OPCs to accelerate bone healing. Images were
在骨缺损的情况下,受伤的血管和血液动力流入的丧失会导致血肿形成和低氧张力,从而通过 HIf-1α 途径刺激血管扩张。最重要的是,这一途径会上调 H 型血管(CD31hiEmcnhi 血管)的萌发。H 型血管与血管周围的成骨细胞(OPCs)、成骨细胞以及骨形成和重塑过程中的前破骨细胞直接相互作用。这种血管生成与骨生成的耦合导致血管和骨组织的同步繁殖,从而实现再生愈合。越来越多的文献表明,H 血管在骨的先天成骨愈合能力中占了很大一部分。我们认为,CD31hiEmcnhi 血管在牵张成骨(DO)过程中对骨愈合起作用。牵引成骨是一种利用牵引力促进内源性骨形成和周围软组织(如皮肤、肌肉、肌腱和神经血管结构)再生的过程。虽然 H 血管对机械损伤的反应足以促进正常健康组织的愈合,但仍不足以克服辐射的破坏。我们认为,CD31hiEmcnhi 血管的破坏阻碍了 DO 在辐照骨缺损愈合中的有效性。因此,我们希望通过利用 H 血管的再生能力来重现骨骼愈合的正常途径。我们假设,局部应用去氧胺(DFO)将增强 H 血管介导的血管生成对辐射损伤的反应,并最终在 DO 过程中实现骨生成愈合。这一发现有可能被用于开发转化治疗药物,从而有望加速骨形成并缩短DO巩固期,从而有可能扩大DO在辐照骨愈合中的应用。Sprague-Dawley 大鼠被分为三组:DO组、DO辐射组(xDO)、DO和DFO植入辐射组(xDODFO)。实验组接受 35 Gy 的辐射。所有组均接受 DO。治疗组从 DFO 术后第 4 天(POD)开始,每隔一天向截骨部位注射一次。动物于术后第 40 天处死。为了进行免疫组化分析,解剖下颌骨并将其在 4% 多聚甲醛中固定 48 小时,在 Cal-Ex II 中脱钙 2 天,用浓度递增的分级乙醇脱水,然后用石蜡包埋。将样本切成7微米厚的纵向切片,包括干骺端和干骺端。进行 CD31 和 Emcn 双免疫荧光染色,以评估 CD31hiEmcnhi 血管形成的程度。然后在 4°C 下用共轭抗体对骨切片染色过夜。细胞核用 Hoechst 染色。切片还用 Osterix 和 CD31 进行双重染色,以研究 H 血管介导的 OPCs 募集数量,从而加速骨愈合。使用尼康 Ti2 宽场显微镜采集图像,并使用 NIS- Elements Advanced Research 5.41.02 软件进行分析。再生样本中 CD31 + Emcn+ 血管的面积分数代表 H 型血管的丰度。再生样本中 Osterix+ 细胞的面积分数代表 OPC 同时向分流间隙增殖的情况。DO 组的 H 型血管比 xDO 组多 6 倍。与 xDO 相比,局部 DFO 使辐照 DO 动物的 H 型血管数量明显增加了 15 倍(p = 0.00133531)。此外,H型血管丰富度更高的DO组和xDODFO组也表现出更好的血管生成和成骨效果。有趣的是,与 DO 组相比,xDODFO 组的 H 型血管形成量增加了一倍,这表明存在超生理反应(p = 0.044655055)。此外,H 血管介导的 OPCs 招募模拟了我们研究组中描述的 H 血管形成趋势。与 DO 对照组相比,辐照 DO 组的 OPCs 含量减少了 3 倍。对 xDO 动物进行 DFO 处理后,辐照损伤得到补救,Osterix+ 细胞的含量增加了 12 倍。最后,与 DO 对照组相比,对辐照动物进行 DFO 处理后,骨生成细胞招募到牵张间隙的数量增加了四倍。在这项研究中,我们开发了一种新方法来观察石蜡切片中的 CD31hiEmcnhi,以研究 DO 的再生。正常 DO 表现出 H 血管形成和相关血管生成-骨生成耦合的显著上调。辐射严重减少了H血管的形成,同时也显著减少了新骨的形成和不愈合。然而,服用 DFO 后,血管得到补充,大量 CD31hiEmcnhi 和 OPC 恢复,重现了骨再生和修复的正常过程。DFO治疗可修复辐照区域的新骨形成和骨结合,这与H血管血管生成-骨生成耦合的增加有关。 虽然还需要进一步的研究来优化这种方法,但这项研究的结果对于将期待已久的局部 DFO 应用于临床领域来说,具有令人难以置信的前景。
{"title":"H Vessel Formation as a Marker for Enhanced Bone Healing in Irradiated Distraction Osteogenesis","authors":"Melissa Daniel, Nathan Sheppard, Garrison Carlos, Noah Nelson, Alex Donneys, Steven R. Buchman","doi":"10.1055/s-0043-1778039","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1778039","url":null,"abstract":"<p>In the setting of bone defects, the injured vasculature and loss of hemodynamic inflow leads to hematoma formation and low oxygen tension which stimulates vascular expansion through the HIf-1α pathway. Most importantly, this pathway upregulates sprouting of type H vessels (CD31hiEmcnhi vessels). H vessels engage in direct interaction with perivascular osteoprogenitor cells (OPCs), osteoblasts, and preosteoclasts of bone formation and remodeling. This angiogenic-osteogenic coupling leads to synchronous propagation of vascular and bony tissue for regenerative healing. A growing body of literature demonstrates that H vessels constitute a large portion of bone's innate capacity for osteogenic healing. We believe that CD31hiEmcnhi vessels play a role in bone healing during distraction osteogenesis (DO). DO is a procedure that utilizes traction forces to facilitate induction of endogenous bone formation and regeneration of surrounding soft tissues such as skin, muscle, tendon, and neurovascular structures. While the H vessel response to mechanical injury is adequate to facilitate healing in normal healthy tissue, it remains inadequate to overcome the devastation of radiation. We posit that the destruction of CD31hiEmcnhi vessels plays a role in precluding DO's effectiveness in irradiated bone defect healing. We aim, therefore, to recapitulate the normal pathway of bony healing by utilizing the regenerative capacity of H vessels. We hypothesize that using localized application of deferoxamine (DFO) will enhance the H vessel-mediated vasculogenic response to radiation damage and ultimately enable osteogenic healing during DO. This discovery could potentially be exploited by developing translational therapeutics to hopefully accelerate bone formation and shorten the DO consolidation period, thereby potentially expanding DO's utilization in irradiated bone healing.</p> <p>Sprague–Dawley rats were divided into three groups: DO, radiation with DO (xDO), and radiation with DO and DFO implantation (xDODFO). Experimental groups received 35 Gy of radiation. All groups underwent DO. The treatment group received injections into the osteotomy site, every other day, beginning on postoperative day (POD) 4 of DFO. Animals were sacrificed on POD 40. For immunohistochemical analysis, mandibles were dissected and fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 48 hours, decalcified in Cal-Ex II for 2 days, dehydrated through graded ethanol of increasing concentration, and then embedded in paraffin. Samples were cut into 7-μm thick longitudinally oriented sections including the metaphysis and diaphysis. CD31 and Emcn double immunofluorescent staining were performed to evaluate the extent of CD31hiEmcnhi vessel formation. Bone sections were then stained with conjugated antibodies overnight at 4°C. Nuclei were stained with Hoechst. Slides were also double stained with Osterix and CD31 to study the quantity of H vessel-mediated recruitment of OPCs to accelerate bone healing. Images were","PeriodicalId":48687,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in Plastic Surgery","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2024-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139508711","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}