Pub Date : 2024-09-06DOI: 10.1016/j.preghy.2024.101156
Dophie Tshibuela Beya , Passy Kimena Nyota , Jérémie Muwonga Masidi , Elisabeth Lumbala Kilembo , Aliocha Nkodila Natuhoyila , Fons Verdonck , Bernard Spitz , Jean Pierre Elongi Moyene
Several studies have demonstrated that predicting complications of preeclampsia up to 48 h before their occurrence enhances clinical management. This predictive ability allows for rational approaches in dealing with groups at high risk of maternal-fetal complications.
Objective
This study aims to identify the clinical parameters strongly associated with maternal-fetal complications during preeclampsia in Congolese pregnant women.
Method
A descriptive and analytical study was conducted in the provincial city of Kinshasa from July 2018 to December 2021. The study population consisted of pregnant women with preeclampsia in three maternity units in Kinshasa. Determinants of complications were assessed using univariate and multivariate logistic regression.
Results
In univariate logistic regression models, obesity, a history of hypertension, severe hypertension, and SpO2 < 90 % were identified as determinants of maternal-fetal complications. Conversely, a history of preeclampsia, treatment with MgSO4, or a combination of AntiHTA and MgSO4 reduced the risk of complications.
In the multivariate model, after adjusting for all significant variables in the univariate model, severe hypertension, obesity, and SpO2 < 90 % were identified as independent determinants of maternal-fetal complications. The risk of complication was multiplied by 5 for severe hypertension, by 4 for obesity, and by 2 for SpO2 < 90 %. However, treating women with MgSO4 or a combination of AntiHTA and MgSO4 reduced the risk of complications by a factor of 4 and 6, respectively.
Conclusion
The presence of symptoms is more useful in predicting complications of preeclampsia than their absence in ruling out adverse events.
{"title":"Clinical maternal risk parameters for the occurrence of maternal and fetal complications during preeclampsia in Congolese women","authors":"Dophie Tshibuela Beya , Passy Kimena Nyota , Jérémie Muwonga Masidi , Elisabeth Lumbala Kilembo , Aliocha Nkodila Natuhoyila , Fons Verdonck , Bernard Spitz , Jean Pierre Elongi Moyene","doi":"10.1016/j.preghy.2024.101156","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.preghy.2024.101156","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Several studies have demonstrated that predicting complications of preeclampsia up to 48 h before their occurrence enhances clinical management. This predictive ability allows for rational approaches in dealing with groups at high risk of maternal-fetal complications.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>This study aims to identify the clinical parameters strongly associated with maternal-fetal complications during preeclampsia in Congolese pregnant women.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>A descriptive and analytical study was conducted in the provincial city of Kinshasa from July 2018 to December 2021. The study population consisted of pregnant women with preeclampsia in three maternity units in Kinshasa. Determinants of complications were assessed using univariate and multivariate logistic regression.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>In univariate logistic regression models, obesity, a history of hypertension, severe hypertension, and SpO<sub>2</sub> < 90 % were identified as determinants of maternal-fetal complications. Conversely, a history of preeclampsia, treatment with MgSO<sub>4</sub>, or a combination of AntiHTA and MgSO<sub>4</sub> reduced the risk of complications.</p><p>In the multivariate model, after adjusting for all significant variables in the univariate model, severe hypertension, obesity, and SpO<sub>2</sub> < 90 % were identified as independent determinants of maternal-fetal complications. The risk of complication was multiplied by 5 for severe hypertension, by 4 for obesity, and by 2 for SpO<sub>2</sub> < 90 %. However, treating women with MgSO<sub>4</sub> or a combination of AntiHTA and MgSO<sub>4</sub> reduced the risk of complications by a factor of 4 and 6, respectively.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The presence of symptoms is more useful in predicting complications of preeclampsia than their absence in ruling out adverse events.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48697,"journal":{"name":"Pregnancy Hypertension-An International Journal of Womens Cardiovascular Health","volume":"38 ","pages":"Article 101156"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2024-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142146604","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-06DOI: 10.1016/j.preghy.2024.101155
Elizabeth Jansen van Rensburg, Louisa B. Seopela, Leon C. Snyman
Objectives
To investigate the relationship between the severity of proteinuria and adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes in patients with preeclampsia (PE).
Design
Prospective cohort study conducted in Gauteng, South Africa over 12 months. Patients with PE 18 years or older with singleton pregnancies were recruited. We included 248 in the final analysis.
Methods
Proteinuria was quantified using urine protein: creatinine ratio (UPCR). Preeclamptic patients’ outcomes were compared according to the UPCR values using regression models and by generating receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves. Primary maternal outcomes were gestational age (GA) at diagnosis, GA at delivery, development of eclampsia, development of severe features and the need for more than one antihypertensive agent. Neonatal outcomes were admission to neonatal unit, 5-min APGAR score, need for ventilatory support and early neonatal death.
Results
There was a weak but significant negative correlation between GA at delivery and UPCR (Spearman’s correlation coefficient (SCC) −0.191, p = 0.002). Most patients (77 %) required >1 agent to control their blood pressure, however there was no correlation between UPCR and the need for additional agents (SCC −0.014, p = 0.828). There was a statistically significant correlation between UPCR and severe features, especially the development of haemolysis, elevated liver enzymes and low platelet (HELLP) syndrome (p = 0.005). There was no significant correlation between neonatal outcomes and UPCR.
Conclusion
Severity of proteinuria correlated with earlier delivery and development of severe features, specifically HELLP syndrome and pulmonary oedema. There was no correlation between UPCR and requiring additional antihypertensive agents or neonatal outcomes.
{"title":"Determining the relationship between severity of proteinuria and adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes in patients with preeclampsia","authors":"Elizabeth Jansen van Rensburg, Louisa B. Seopela, Leon C. Snyman","doi":"10.1016/j.preghy.2024.101155","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.preghy.2024.101155","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To investigate the relationship between the severity of proteinuria and adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes in patients with preeclampsia (PE).</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Prospective cohort study conducted in Gauteng, South Africa<!--> <!-->over 12 months. Patients<!--> <!-->with PE 18 years or older<!--> <!-->with singleton pregnancies<!--> <!-->were recruited. We<!--> <!-->included<!--> <!-->248<!--> <!-->in the final analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Proteinuria was quantified using urine protein: creatinine ratio (UPCR). Preeclamptic patients’ outcomes<!--> <!-->were compared according to the UPCR values using regression models and by generating receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves. Primary maternal outcomes were gestational age (GA) at diagnosis, GA at delivery, development of eclampsia, development of severe features and the need for more than one antihypertensive<!--> <!-->agent. Neonatal outcomes were admission to neonatal unit, 5-min APGAR score, need for ventilatory support and early neonatal death.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>There was a weak but significant negative correlation between GA at delivery and UPCR (Spearman’s correlation coefficient (SCC) −0.191, p = 0.002). Most patients (77 %) required >1 agent to control their blood pressure, however there was no correlation between UPCR and the need for additional agents (SCC −0.014, p = 0.828). There was a statistically significant correlation between UPCR and severe features, especially the development of haemolysis, elevated liver enzymes and low platelet (HELLP) syndrome (p = 0.005). There was no significant correlation between neonatal outcomes and UPCR.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Severity of proteinuria correlated with earlier delivery and development of severe features, specifically HELLP syndrome and pulmonary oedema. There was no correlation between UPCR and requiring additional antihypertensive<!--> <!-->agents<!--> <!-->or neonatal outcomes.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48697,"journal":{"name":"Pregnancy Hypertension-An International Journal of Womens Cardiovascular Health","volume":"38 ","pages":"Article 101155"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2024-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221077892400182X/pdfft?md5=a18c5485fffb586f852dd50f67c5cb63&pid=1-s2.0-S221077892400182X-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142146605","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-01DOI: 10.1016/j.preghy.2024.101153
Jeske M. bij de Weg , Marjon A. de Boer , Benjamin Y. Gravesteijn , Wietske Hermes , Wessel Ganzevoort , Frank van Bel , Ben Willem Mol , Christianne J.M. de Groot
Objectives
Blood pressure control in severe hypertension of pregnancy is crucial for mother and neonate. In absence of evidence, guidelines recommend either intravenous labetalol or nicardipine. We compared the effectiveness and safety of these two drugs in women with severe hypertension in pregnancy.
Study design
We performed an open label randomized controlled trial. Women with a singleton pregnancy complicated by severe hypertension (systolic ≥ 160 mmHg and/or diastolic ≥ 110 mmHg) requiring intravenous antihypertensive treatment were randomized to intravenous labetalol or intravenous nicardipine. The primary outcome was a composite adverse neonatal outcome defined as severe Respiratory Distress Syndrome (RDS), Broncho Pulmonary Dysplasia (BPD), Intraventricular Hemorrhage (IVH) IIB or worse, Necrotizing Enterocolitis (NEC), or perinatal death defined as fetal death or neonatal death before discharge from the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU).
Based on a power analysis, we estimated that 472 women (236 per group) needed to be included to detect a difference of 15% in the primary outcome with 90% power. The study was halted prematurely at 30 inclusions because of slow recruitment and trial fatigue.
Results
Between August 2018 and April 2022, we randomized 30 women of which 16 were allocated to intravenous nicardipine and 14 to intravenous labetalol. The composite adverse neonatal outcome was not significantly different between the two groups (25 % versus 43 % OR 0.28 (95 % CI 0.05–1.43), p = 0.12)). Respiratory distress syndrome occurred more often in the labetalol group than in the nicardipine group (42.9 % versus 12.5 %). Neonatal hypoglycemia occurred more often in the nicardipine group than in the labetalol group (31 % versus 7 %). Time until blood pressure control was faster in women treated with nicardipine than in women treated with labetalol (45 (15–150 min vs. 120 (60–127,5) min).
Conclusion
In our prematurely halted small RCT, we were unable to provide evidence for the optimal choice of treatment for severe hypertension to improve neonatal outcome and/or to obtain faster blood pressure control. Differences in Respiratory distress syndrome and neonatal hypoglycemia between the groups might be the result of coincidental finding due to the small groups included in the study. A larger randomized trial would be needed to determine the safest and most efficacious (intravenous) therapy for severe hypertension in pregnancy. This study emphasizes the challenges of conducting a RCT for the optimal treatment for these women.
目的控制严重妊娠高血压患者的血压对母亲和新生儿至关重要。在缺乏证据的情况下,指南推荐静脉注射拉贝洛尔或尼卡地平。我们比较了这两种药物对患有严重妊娠高血压的妇女的有效性和安全性。单胎妊娠合并严重高血压(收缩压≥160 mmHg和/或舒张压≥110 mmHg)需要静脉降压治疗的妇女被随机分配到静脉注射拉贝洛尔或静脉注射尼卡地平中。主要结果是新生儿综合不良结局,即严重呼吸窘迫综合征(RDS)、支气管肺发育不良(BPD)、脑室内出血(IVH)IIB或更严重、坏死性小肠结肠炎(NEC)或围产期死亡,即胎儿死亡或新生儿重症监护室(NICU)出院前新生儿死亡。根据功率分析,我们估计需要纳入 472 名产妇(每组 236 人),才能以 90% 的功率检测出主要结果中 15% 的差异。由于招募缓慢和试验疲劳,研究在纳入 30 人时提前结束。结果2018 年 8 月至 2022 年 4 月间,我们对 30 名产妇进行了随机分配,其中 16 人被分配到静脉注射尼卡地平,14 人被分配到静脉注射拉贝洛尔。两组新生儿综合不良结局无明显差异(25% 对 43% OR 0.28 (95 % CI 0.05-1.43), p = 0.12))。拉贝洛尔组的呼吸窘迫综合征发生率高于尼卡地平组(42.9% 对 12.5%)。尼卡地平组新生儿低血糖发生率高于拉贝洛尔组(31%对7%)。尼卡地平组比拉贝洛尔组更快控制血压(45 (15-150 min vs. 120 (60-127,5) min)。结论 在这项过早终止的小型研究中,我们无法提供证据证明选择治疗严重高血压的最佳方法可改善新生儿预后和/或更快控制血压。各组间在呼吸窘迫综合征和新生儿低血糖方面的差异可能是由于研究中纳入的组别较少而偶然发现的结果。需要进行更大规模的随机试验,以确定治疗严重妊娠高血压最安全、最有效的(静脉)疗法。这项研究强调了为这些妇女提供最佳治疗而进行 RCT 所面临的挑战。
{"title":"Optimal treatment for women with acute hypertension in pregnancy; a randomized trial comparing intravenous labetalol versus nicardipine","authors":"Jeske M. bij de Weg , Marjon A. de Boer , Benjamin Y. Gravesteijn , Wietske Hermes , Wessel Ganzevoort , Frank van Bel , Ben Willem Mol , Christianne J.M. de Groot","doi":"10.1016/j.preghy.2024.101153","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.preghy.2024.101153","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>Blood pressure control in severe hypertension of pregnancy is crucial for mother and neonate. In absence of evidence, guidelines recommend either intravenous labetalol or nicardipine. We compared the effectiveness and safety of these two drugs in women with severe hypertension in pregnancy.</p></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><p>We performed an open label randomized controlled trial. Women with a singleton pregnancy complicated by severe hypertension (systolic ≥ 160 mmHg and/or diastolic ≥ 110 mmHg) requiring intravenous antihypertensive treatment were randomized to intravenous labetalol or intravenous nicardipine. The primary outcome was a composite adverse neonatal outcome defined as severe Respiratory Distress Syndrome (RDS), Broncho Pulmonary Dysplasia (BPD), Intraventricular Hemorrhage (IVH) IIB or worse, Necrotizing Enterocolitis (NEC), or perinatal death defined as fetal death or neonatal death before discharge from the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU).</p><p>Based on a power analysis, we estimated that 472 women (236 per group) needed to be included to detect a difference of 15% in the primary outcome with 90% power. The study was halted prematurely at 30 inclusions because of slow recruitment and trial fatigue.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Between August 2018 and April 2022, we randomized 30 women of which 16 were allocated to intravenous nicardipine and 14 to intravenous labetalol. The composite adverse neonatal outcome was not significantly different between the two groups (25 % versus 43 % OR 0.28 (95 % CI 0.05–1.43), p = 0.12)). Respiratory distress syndrome occurred more often in the labetalol group than in the nicardipine group (42.9 % versus 12.5 %). Neonatal hypoglycemia occurred more often in the nicardipine group than in the labetalol group (31 % versus 7 %). Time until blood pressure control was faster in women treated with nicardipine than in women treated with labetalol (45 (15–150 min vs. 120 (60–127,5) min).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>In our prematurely halted small RCT, we were unable to provide evidence for the optimal choice of treatment for severe hypertension to improve neonatal outcome and/or to obtain faster blood pressure control. Differences in Respiratory distress syndrome and neonatal hypoglycemia between the groups might be the result of coincidental finding due to the small groups included in the study. A larger randomized trial would be needed to determine the safest and most efficacious (intravenous) therapy for severe hypertension in pregnancy. This study emphasizes the challenges of conducting a RCT for the optimal treatment for these women.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48697,"journal":{"name":"Pregnancy Hypertension-An International Journal of Womens Cardiovascular Health","volume":"38 ","pages":"Article 101153"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2210778924001806/pdfft?md5=5b9d7dae3de0873870d28934c539e92b&pid=1-s2.0-S2210778924001806-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142117397","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-01DOI: 10.1016/j.preghy.2024.101154
Annetine (Anne Cathrine) Staff , Manu Vatish , David Hall , Annemarie Hennessy
{"title":"A tribute to Christopher Redman, MB, BChir, FRCP, FRCOG (ad eundum)","authors":"Annetine (Anne Cathrine) Staff , Manu Vatish , David Hall , Annemarie Hennessy","doi":"10.1016/j.preghy.2024.101154","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.preghy.2024.101154","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":48697,"journal":{"name":"Pregnancy Hypertension-An International Journal of Womens Cardiovascular Health","volume":"37 ","pages":"Article 101154"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2210778924001818/pdfft?md5=eb5aac00a598865f8ced65ed44f13e9b&pid=1-s2.0-S2210778924001818-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142117755","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-08-29DOI: 10.1016/j.preghy.2024.101152
James D. Doss , Emily Diveley , Fan Zhang , Amy Scheffer , Ruizhi Huang , Daniel Jackson , Nandini Raghuraman , Ebony B. Carter , Indira U. Mysorekar , Jeannie C. Kelly
Objectives
Our study aimed to explore the impact of COVID-19 infection on pregnancy outcomes, accounting for the progression of variants, vaccines, and treatment modalities.
Study Design
We performed a prospective longitudinal cohort study at two urban tertiary centers enrolling patients with a confirmed intrauterine singleton pregnancy from December 23, 2020 to July 18, 2022. Patients were evaluated for SARS-CoV-2 infection at enrollment and every trimester using serum antibody testing. The primary outcome was preterm birth. Symptom and treatment data were collected from pregnant patients with COVID-19 infections. Variant strain infection status was determined from local wastewater analysis.
Results
448 patients were enrolled, and 390 patients were retained through delivery with 159 unexposed and 231 exposed patients, of whom 56 patients (26.0 %) crossed over after enrollment to the exposed cohorts during pregnancy. There was no difference in rates of preterm birth between exposed and unexposed cohorts (14.6 % vs 11.3 %), in deliveries < 34 weeks (1.5 % vs 2.7 %), PPROM, (0.4 % vs 1.3 %), or gestational age at delivery (38.1 vs 38.2). Exposed patients were significantly more likely to be diagnosed with a hypertensive disorder (aOR 2.3, 95 % CI 1.2–4.1), specifically gestational hypertension (aOR 2.8, 95 % CI 1.3––6.0), but not preeclampsia/eclampsia. There were no differences in individual or composite neonatal outcomes.
Conclusions
Our study contributed to the understanding of the effects of SARS-CoV-2 infection on pregnancy outcomes, with increased risk of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy but overall, no differences in adverse neonatal outcomes. Regular antenatal PCR and antibody screening allowed for higher detection and inclusion of patients with asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection and effects on maternal and neonatal outcomes.
{"title":"A prospective cohort study of pregnancy outcomes following antepartum infection with SARS-CoV-2","authors":"James D. Doss , Emily Diveley , Fan Zhang , Amy Scheffer , Ruizhi Huang , Daniel Jackson , Nandini Raghuraman , Ebony B. Carter , Indira U. Mysorekar , Jeannie C. Kelly","doi":"10.1016/j.preghy.2024.101152","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.preghy.2024.101152","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>Our study aimed to explore the impact of COVID-19 infection on pregnancy outcomes, accounting for the progression of variants, vaccines, and treatment modalities.</p></div><div><h3>Study Design</h3><p>We performed a prospective longitudinal cohort study at two urban tertiary centers enrolling patients with a confirmed intrauterine singleton pregnancy from December 23, 2020 to July 18, 2022. Patients were evaluated for SARS-CoV-2 infection at enrollment and every trimester using serum antibody testing. The primary outcome was preterm birth. Symptom and treatment data were collected from pregnant patients with COVID-19 infections. Variant strain infection status was determined from local wastewater analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>448 patients were enrolled, and 390 patients were retained through delivery with 159 unexposed and 231 exposed patients, of whom 56 patients (26.0 %) crossed over after enrollment to the exposed cohorts during pregnancy. There was no difference in rates of preterm birth between exposed and unexposed cohorts (14.6 % vs 11.3 %), in deliveries < 34 weeks (1.5 % vs 2.7 %), PPROM, (0.4 % vs 1.3 %), or gestational age at delivery (38.1 vs 38.2). Exposed patients were significantly more likely to be diagnosed with a hypertensive disorder (aOR 2.3, 95 % CI 1.2–4.1), specifically gestational hypertension (aOR 2.8, 95 % CI 1.3––6.0), but not preeclampsia/eclampsia. There were no differences in individual or composite neonatal outcomes.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Our study contributed to the understanding of the effects of SARS-CoV-2 infection on pregnancy outcomes, with increased risk of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy but overall, no differences in adverse neonatal outcomes. Regular antenatal PCR and antibody screening allowed for higher detection and inclusion of patients with asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection and effects on maternal and neonatal outcomes.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48697,"journal":{"name":"Pregnancy Hypertension-An International Journal of Womens Cardiovascular Health","volume":"37 ","pages":"Article 101152"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2024-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142088411","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
This study aimed to elucidate clinical characteristics, disease severity, and obstetric outcomes in women with pregnancy complicated with preeclampsia stratified by gestational age at delivery.
Study design
This retrospective study was conducted at a tertiary care facility from January 2011 to December 2020.
Main outcome measures
Maternal characteristics, risk factors, clinical signs and symptoms, laboratory test results, and maternal and perinatal outcomes were compared between early (<34 weeks) versus late (≥34 weeks) and preterm (<37 weeks) versus term (≥37 weeks) preeclampsia.
Results
More than half of the women (56 %, 612/1094) had preterm preeclampsia. Overall, 30 % (329/1094) delivered before 34 weeks of gestation. Pregnancies with early preeclampsia had the worst maternal signs and symptoms, the highest median blood pressure level, and more abnormal laboratory abnormalities compared to those with late preeclampsia. Additionally, women with co-morbid diseases (chronic hypertension, chronic kidney disease, and systemic lupus erythematosus) were more likely to develop early than late preeclampsia. Of note, although adverse maternal and perinatal events occurred more commonly in early rather than late preeclampsia, 18 % (7/39) of eclampsia and 16 % (8/50) of hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, and low platelet count syndrome cases occurred after 37 weeks of gestation.
Conclusions
Early preeclampsia posed the highest risk to the mother and infant(s); however, adverse maternal and perinatal events were still present even in cases of preeclampsia at term. Therefore, it is crucial for healthcare practitioners to remain vigilant and manage all cases with great care to prevent adverse outcomes.
{"title":"Preeclampsia and timing of delivery: Disease severity, maternal and perinatal outcomes","authors":"Manaphat Suksai , Alan Geater , Pawinee Amornchat , Thitima Suntharasaj , Chitkasaem Suwanrath , Ninlapa Pruksanusak","doi":"10.1016/j.preghy.2024.101151","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.preghy.2024.101151","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>This study aimed to elucidate clinical characteristics, disease severity, and obstetric outcomes in women with pregnancy complicated with preeclampsia stratified by gestational age at delivery.</p></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><p>This retrospective study was conducted at a tertiary care facility from January 2011 to December 2020.</p></div><div><h3>Main outcome measures</h3><p>Maternal characteristics, risk factors, clinical signs and symptoms, laboratory test results, and maternal and perinatal outcomes were compared between early (<34 weeks) versus late (≥34 weeks) and preterm (<37 weeks) versus term (≥37 weeks) preeclampsia.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>More than half of the women (56 %, 612/1094) had preterm preeclampsia. Overall, 30 % (329/1094) delivered before 34 weeks of gestation. Pregnancies with early preeclampsia had the worst maternal signs and symptoms, the highest median blood pressure level, and more abnormal laboratory abnormalities compared to those with late preeclampsia. Additionally, women with co-morbid diseases (chronic hypertension, chronic kidney disease, and systemic lupus erythematosus) were more likely to develop early than late preeclampsia. Of note, although adverse maternal and perinatal events occurred more commonly in early rather than late preeclampsia, 18 % (7/39) of eclampsia and 16 % (8/50) of hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, and low platelet count syndrome cases occurred after 37 weeks of gestation.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Early preeclampsia posed the highest risk to the mother and infant(s); however, adverse maternal and perinatal events were still present even in cases of preeclampsia at term. Therefore, it is crucial for healthcare practitioners to remain vigilant and manage all cases with great care to prevent adverse outcomes.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48697,"journal":{"name":"Pregnancy Hypertension-An International Journal of Womens Cardiovascular Health","volume":"37 ","pages":"Article 101151"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2024-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142088410","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-08-18DOI: 10.1016/j.preghy.2024.101146
Priscilla Koirala, Vesna Garovic, Maria Irene Dato, Andrea Kattah
Background
Our goal was to identify what impact chronic kidney disease (CKD) and its associated risk factors, such as body mass index (BMI), diabetes and hypertension, have on preeclampsia and other adverse pregnancy outcomes in the CKD population.
Methods
This was a population-based cohort study of women with CKD who had a pregnancy from 2010 to 2022 (n = 95). At the time of the woman’s pregnancy, data was collected on demographics, clinical measures, BMI, CKD etiology and other renal parameters. Outcomes included preeclampsia, pre-term delivery, and low birth weight.
Results
Pre-pregnancy BMI increased over time in patients with CKD, with a median (interquartile range) BMI of 25 (22–29) prior to 2016 and 29 (25–34) after 2016 (p = 0.01). There were significant trends of increasing age at delivery and decreasing pre-pregnancy estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) by delivery year. Preeclampsia affected nearly half of pregnancies in this cohort. In multivariate analyses, BMI and chronic hypertension did not impact the odds of preeclampsia, preterm delivery or low birth weight, though a CKD etiology of diabetes (19/20 with type I diabetes), was associated with a significant increase in preeclampsia risk (odds ratio (OR) 7.41 (95 % CI 2.1–26.1)). Higher pre-pregnancy eGFR was associated with a lower odds of preterm delivery (OR 0.81 (95 % CI 0.67–0.98)) per 10 ml/min/1.73 m2).
Conclusion
Pre-pregnancy BMI significantly increased over time, similar to the general population. While preeclampsia was common in CKD patients, outcomes were associated with eGFR and CKD etiology as opposed to BMI and chronic hypertension.
背景我们的目标是确定慢性肾脏病(CKD)及其相关风险因素(如体重指数(BMI)、糖尿病和高血压)对 CKD 群体中子痫前期和其他不良妊娠结局的影响。在妇女怀孕时,收集了有关人口统计学、临床测量、体重指数、慢性肾脏病病因和其他肾脏参数的数据。结果 包括子痫前期、早产和低出生体重。结果 随着时间的推移,CKD 患者的孕前 BMI 有所增加,2016 年之前的中位数(四分位间范围)BMI 为 25(22-29),2016 年之后为 29(25-34)(P = 0.01)。根据分娩年份的不同,分娩年龄呈上升趋势,孕前估计肾小球滤过率(eGFR)呈下降趋势。子痫前期影响了该队列中近一半的孕妇。在多变量分析中,体重指数和慢性高血压对子痫前期、早产或低出生体重的几率没有影响,但慢性肾脏病的糖尿病病因(19/20 患有 I 型糖尿病)与子痫前期风险的显著增加有关(几率比 (OR) 7.41 (95 % CI 2.1-26.1))。较高的孕前 eGFR 与较低的早产几率相关(OR 0.81 (95 % CI 0.67-0.98) per 10 ml/min/1.73 m2)。虽然子痫前期在慢性肾脏病患者中很常见,但其结果与 eGFR 和慢性肾脏病病因有关,而与 BMI 和慢性高血压无关。
{"title":"Role of chronic kidney disease and risk factors in preeclampsia","authors":"Priscilla Koirala, Vesna Garovic, Maria Irene Dato, Andrea Kattah","doi":"10.1016/j.preghy.2024.101146","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.preghy.2024.101146","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Our goal was to identify what impact chronic kidney disease (CKD) and its associated risk factors, such as body mass index (BMI), diabetes and hypertension, have on preeclampsia and other adverse pregnancy outcomes in the CKD population.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This was a population-based cohort study of women with CKD who had a pregnancy from 2010 to 2022 (n = 95). At the time of the woman’s pregnancy, data was collected on demographics, clinical measures, BMI, CKD etiology and other renal parameters. Outcomes included preeclampsia, pre-term delivery, and low birth weight.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Pre-pregnancy BMI increased over time in patients with CKD, with a median (interquartile range) BMI of 25 (22–29) prior to 2016 and 29 (25–34) after 2016 (p = 0.01). There were significant trends of increasing age at delivery and decreasing pre-pregnancy estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) by delivery year. Preeclampsia affected nearly half of pregnancies in this cohort. In multivariate analyses, BMI and chronic hypertension did not impact the odds of preeclampsia, preterm delivery or low birth weight, though a CKD etiology of diabetes (19/20 with type I diabetes), was associated with a significant increase in preeclampsia risk (odds ratio (OR) 7.41 (95 % CI 2.1–26.1)). Higher pre-pregnancy eGFR was associated with a lower odds of preterm delivery (OR 0.81 (95 % CI 0.67–0.98)) per 10 ml/min/1.73 m<sup>2</sup>).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Pre-pregnancy BMI significantly increased over time, similar to the general population. While preeclampsia was common in CKD patients, outcomes were associated with eGFR and CKD etiology as opposed to BMI and chronic hypertension.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48697,"journal":{"name":"Pregnancy Hypertension-An International Journal of Womens Cardiovascular Health","volume":"37 ","pages":"Article 101146"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2024-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142002286","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-08-16DOI: 10.1016/j.preghy.2024.101147
Nicolina Smith , Sun Kwon Kim , Gregory Goyert , Chun-Hui Lin , Courtney Rose , D’Angela S. Pitts
Background
Nifedipine has previously exhibited superior efficacy to labetalol in managing hypertension in the non-pregnant Black population, establishing itself as a first-line treatment option. However, the unique challenges of hypertension during pregnancy, especially prevalent in Black individuals, remain underexplored in terms of effective medication choices. This gap highlights the need for targeted research on antihypertensive efficacy specifically within this population.
Objective
This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of nifedipine versus labetalol in managing blood pressure in Black pregnancies. The primary measure is the mean systolic and diastolic blood pressure trajectories throughout pregnancy, determining the superiority of nifedipine in this context.
Study design
A retrospective cohort study was conducted at a multi-center institution in the metropolitan Detroit area, encompassing data from 1,235 Black pregnancies affected by chronic hypertension between 2015 and 2022. Mean blood pressure trajectories during pregnancy were fit by linear mixed effects model with a random intercept and time effect.
Results
Patients on nifedipine had an estimated 2.08 mmHg lower mean systolic and 1.60 mmHg lower mean diastolic blood pressure compared to those on labetalol, with significant p-values of 0.040 and 0.028. Additionally, nifedipine users were less likely to need increased doses, with an odds ratio of 0.28 (95 % CI: 0.19–0.40, p < 0.001) compared to labetalol users.
Conclusion
This study provides compelling evidence that nifedipine outperforms labetalol in managing blood pressure during Black pregnancies. These findings suggest that the initiation of nifedipine should be considered in the management of chronic hypertension among Black pregnant individuals, offering a potentially more effective treatment option.
{"title":"Nifedipine outperforms labetalol: A comparative analysis of hypertension management in black pregnancies","authors":"Nicolina Smith , Sun Kwon Kim , Gregory Goyert , Chun-Hui Lin , Courtney Rose , D’Angela S. Pitts","doi":"10.1016/j.preghy.2024.101147","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.preghy.2024.101147","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Nifedipine has previously exhibited superior efficacy to labetalol in managing hypertension in the non-pregnant Black population, establishing itself as a first-line treatment option. However, the unique challenges of hypertension during pregnancy, especially prevalent in Black individuals, remain underexplored in terms of effective medication choices. This gap highlights the need for targeted research on antihypertensive efficacy specifically within this population.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of nifedipine versus labetalol in managing blood pressure in Black pregnancies. The primary measure is the mean systolic and diastolic blood pressure trajectories throughout pregnancy, determining the superiority of nifedipine in this context.</p></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><p>A retrospective cohort study was conducted at a multi-center institution in the metropolitan Detroit area, encompassing data from 1,235 Black pregnancies affected by chronic hypertension between 2015 and 2022. Mean blood pressure trajectories during pregnancy were fit by linear mixed effects model with a random intercept and time effect.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Patients on nifedipine had an estimated 2.08 mmHg lower mean systolic and 1.60 mmHg lower mean diastolic blood pressure compared to those on labetalol, with significant p-values of 0.040 and 0.028. Additionally, nifedipine users were less likely to need increased doses, with an odds ratio of 0.28 (95 % CI: 0.19–0.40, p < 0.001) compared to labetalol users.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>This study provides compelling evidence that nifedipine outperforms labetalol in managing blood pressure during Black pregnancies. These findings suggest that the initiation of nifedipine should be considered in the management of chronic hypertension among Black pregnant individuals, offering a potentially more effective treatment option.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48697,"journal":{"name":"Pregnancy Hypertension-An International Journal of Womens Cardiovascular Health","volume":"37 ","pages":"Article 101147"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2024-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141996725","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-08-14DOI: 10.1016/j.preghy.2024.101150
Jussara Mayrink , Maria J. Miele , Renato T. Souza , Jose P. Guida , Guilherme M. Nobrega , Rafael B. Galvão , Maria L. Costa , Karayna G. Fernandes , Vinícius C Capetini , Ana CF Arantes , Gabriel F. Anhê , José L Costa , Jose G. Cecatti , for the Preterm SAMBA study group
Objective
To explore the association between serum levels and food intake of Vitamin D (VD) among healthy women in mid-pregnancy and preeclampsia.
Study Design: In a Brazilian multicentre cohort of healthy nulliparous pregnant women from five maternity centres we developed a nested case-control analysis comparing cases with and without preeclampsia. Women were enrolled and followed during prenatal care, including only singleton pregnancies, without any fetal malformations or previous chronic maternal disease. We matched 87 cases of preeclampsia to eligible controls randomly selected in a 1:1 ratio, by age and region.
Main outcome measures: Blood samples from these were collected, and a 24-hour recall of food intake was obtained in mid-pregnancy, between 19 and 21 weeks. VD serum levels (25-hydroxyvitamin D) were measured by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry and were categorized as deficient, insufficient, and sufficient. The dietary intake of VD was estimated with the 24-hour diet recall applied at the same time and from supplementation. Maternal characteristics and VD levels were compared between cases and controls with OR and respective 95 %CI. Multivariate analysis using the Path method was used to assess relationships among VD, PE, BMI, skin colour/ethnicity, and diet.
Results
The maternal characteristics of both groups were similar, except for the higher occurrence of obesity among women with preeclampsia (OR 3.47, 95 %CI 1.48–8.65). Dietary intake of VD was similar in both groups, and most of the women in both groups consumed insufficient VD (82.2 vs 79.3 % in the groups with and without PE).
Conclusions
Levels and dietary intake of VD were not associated with PE in this Brazilian sample of healthy pregnant women; however, BMI and skin colour/ethnicity were associated with PE.
{"title":"Are vitamin D intake and serum levels in the mid-trimester of pregnancy associated with preeclampsia? Results from a Brazilian multicentre cohort","authors":"Jussara Mayrink , Maria J. Miele , Renato T. Souza , Jose P. Guida , Guilherme M. Nobrega , Rafael B. Galvão , Maria L. Costa , Karayna G. Fernandes , Vinícius C Capetini , Ana CF Arantes , Gabriel F. Anhê , José L Costa , Jose G. Cecatti , for the Preterm SAMBA study group","doi":"10.1016/j.preghy.2024.101150","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.preghy.2024.101150","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To explore the association between serum levels and food intake of Vitamin D (VD) among healthy women in mid-pregnancy and preeclampsia.</p><p><em>Study Design:</em> In a Brazilian multicentre cohort of healthy nulliparous pregnant women from five maternity centres we developed a nested case-control analysis comparing cases with and without preeclampsia. Women were enrolled and followed during prenatal care, including only singleton pregnancies, without any fetal malformations or previous chronic maternal disease. We matched 87 cases of preeclampsia to eligible controls randomly selected in a 1:1 ratio, by age and region.</p><p><em>Main outcome measures</em>: Blood samples from these were collected, and a 24-hour recall of food intake was obtained in mid-pregnancy, between 19 and 21 weeks. VD serum levels (25-hydroxyvitamin D) were measured by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry and were categorized as deficient, insufficient, and sufficient. The dietary intake of VD was estimated with the 24-hour diet recall applied at the same time and from supplementation. Maternal characteristics and VD levels were compared between cases and controls with OR and respective 95 %CI. Multivariate analysis using the Path method was used to assess relationships among VD, PE, BMI, skin colour/ethnicity, and diet.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The maternal characteristics of both groups were similar, except for the higher occurrence of obesity among women with preeclampsia (OR 3.47, 95 %CI 1.48–8.65). Dietary intake of VD was similar in both groups, and most of the women in both groups consumed insufficient VD (82.2 vs 79.3 % in the groups with and without PE).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Levels and dietary intake of VD were not associated with PE in this Brazilian sample of healthy pregnant women; however, BMI and skin colour/ethnicity were associated with PE.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48697,"journal":{"name":"Pregnancy Hypertension-An International Journal of Womens Cardiovascular Health","volume":"37 ","pages":"Article 101150"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2024-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141985380","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}