Pub Date : 2026-01-01DOI: 10.1016/S2352-3026(25)00320-5
Khaled M Musallam, Sujit Sheth, Maria Domenica Cappellini, Farrukh Shah, Stefano Rivella, Vijay G Sankaran, Kevin H M Kuo, Vip Viprakasit, Androulla Eleftheriou, Michael Angastiniotis, Franco Locatelli, Ali T Taher
β-thalassaemia is an inherited haemoglobinopathy characterised by ineffective erythropoiesis and chronic anaemia of varying severity, which is predominant in the region extending from the Mediterranean basin and Middle East towards southeast Asia. Patients with severe phenotypes require lifelong transfusions, iron overload monitoring, and chelation. Suboptimal management due to access challenges continues to be directly linked to increased morbidity and mortality in many regions. In the past few decades, an improved understanding of the underlying pathogenesis of β-thalassaemia has led to the development of several disease-modifying therapies and curative gene manipulation techniques. However, global disparities in access and the need for specialised expertise hinder their wide implementation, especially in resource-limited countries where more than 80% of patients live. Uncertainty about which biomarkers can predict patient response further complicates the selection of patients for treatment. Beyond the need for access programmes and pragmatic national health policies, patient prioritisation by treating physicians, informed by available evidence and expert opinion, is crucial for ensuring that a resource-cautious management approach is implemented. This Viewpoint provides a decision matrix to prioritise interventions by need, benefit, and risk in settings with inadequate access, and to identify alternatives when standard options are unavailable. It draws on the Thalassaemia International Federation guidelines, best available trial and real-world evidence, and expert consensus from virtual discussions among the authors (haematologists, bone marrow transplantation physicians, patient group representatives, translational scientists, and trialists).
{"title":"Management of transfusion-dependent β-thalassaemia in the era of novel therapies: a prioritisation-based matrix for settings with limited resources.","authors":"Khaled M Musallam, Sujit Sheth, Maria Domenica Cappellini, Farrukh Shah, Stefano Rivella, Vijay G Sankaran, Kevin H M Kuo, Vip Viprakasit, Androulla Eleftheriou, Michael Angastiniotis, Franco Locatelli, Ali T Taher","doi":"10.1016/S2352-3026(25)00320-5","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/S2352-3026(25)00320-5","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>β-thalassaemia is an inherited haemoglobinopathy characterised by ineffective erythropoiesis and chronic anaemia of varying severity, which is predominant in the region extending from the Mediterranean basin and Middle East towards southeast Asia. Patients with severe phenotypes require lifelong transfusions, iron overload monitoring, and chelation. Suboptimal management due to access challenges continues to be directly linked to increased morbidity and mortality in many regions. In the past few decades, an improved understanding of the underlying pathogenesis of β-thalassaemia has led to the development of several disease-modifying therapies and curative gene manipulation techniques. However, global disparities in access and the need for specialised expertise hinder their wide implementation, especially in resource-limited countries where more than 80% of patients live. Uncertainty about which biomarkers can predict patient response further complicates the selection of patients for treatment. Beyond the need for access programmes and pragmatic national health policies, patient prioritisation by treating physicians, informed by available evidence and expert opinion, is crucial for ensuring that a resource-cautious management approach is implemented. This Viewpoint provides a decision matrix to prioritise interventions by need, benefit, and risk in settings with inadequate access, and to identify alternatives when standard options are unavailable. It draws on the Thalassaemia International Federation guidelines, best available trial and real-world evidence, and expert consensus from virtual discussions among the authors (haematologists, bone marrow transplantation physicians, patient group representatives, translational scientists, and trialists).</p>","PeriodicalId":48726,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Haematology","volume":"13 1","pages":"e49-e54"},"PeriodicalIF":17.7,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145893377","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-01DOI: 10.1016/S2352-3026(25)00297-2
Farouk Kabbara, Nicole Charbel, Joseph Klim, Sacha El Khoury, Hassan Fawaz, Suzanne Koussa, Rayan Bou-Fakhredin, Ali Taher
{"title":"Thalassaemia clinical trials in war-stricken Lebanon: a story of struggle and resilience.","authors":"Farouk Kabbara, Nicole Charbel, Joseph Klim, Sacha El Khoury, Hassan Fawaz, Suzanne Koussa, Rayan Bou-Fakhredin, Ali Taher","doi":"10.1016/S2352-3026(25)00297-2","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/S2352-3026(25)00297-2","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":48726,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Haematology","volume":"13 1","pages":"e6-e7"},"PeriodicalIF":17.7,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145893429","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-01DOI: 10.1016/S2352-3026(25)00344-8
The Lancet Haematology
{"title":"Lymphoma in the BiTE era.","authors":"The Lancet Haematology","doi":"10.1016/S2352-3026(25)00344-8","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/S2352-3026(25)00344-8","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":48726,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Haematology","volume":"13 1","pages":"e1"},"PeriodicalIF":17.7,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145893404","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-01DOI: 10.1016/S2352-3026(25)00343-6
Roanna D M Maharaj
{"title":"Living between roles: navigating professional and patient identities with thalassaemia.","authors":"Roanna D M Maharaj","doi":"10.1016/S2352-3026(25)00343-6","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/S2352-3026(25)00343-6","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":48726,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Haematology","volume":"13 1","pages":"e4-e5"},"PeriodicalIF":17.7,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145893406","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-01DOI: 10.1016/S2352-3026(25)00285-6
Andreas Seas
{"title":"Lessons from both sides of the bedrail.","authors":"Andreas Seas","doi":"10.1016/S2352-3026(25)00285-6","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/S2352-3026(25)00285-6","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":48726,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Haematology","volume":"13 1","pages":"e3"},"PeriodicalIF":17.7,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145893320","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-01DOI: 10.1016/S2352-3026(25)00298-4
Charlotte L B M Korst, Wouter Plattel, Elizabeth A de Kort, Febe Smits, Alexandra J Croockewit, Mark-David Levin, Matthijs Westerman, Okke de Weerdt, Inger S Nijhof, Jurgen Wegman, Nina Smit, Christie P M Verkleij, Tuna Mutis, Kazem Nasserinejad, Ramses Kerstiens, Marjolein van der Klift, Laurens E Franssen, Maaike E M de Ruijter, Kaz Groen, Ellen van der Spek, Wilfried W H Roeloffzen, Sonja Zweegman, Niels W C J van de Donk
Background: Iberdomide is an oral cereblon E3 ligase modulator with higher affinity to cereblon than immunomodulatory drugs, leading to improved direct anti-myeloma activity and enhanced immunostimulatory effects. We aimed to evaluate the safety and activity of iberdomide plus low-dose cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone (IberCd) in patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma.
Methods: The ICON study is a prospective, single-arm, phase 2, open-label study conducted in eight hospitals in the Netherlands. We enrolled patients (aged ≥18 years) with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (lenalidomide-refractory) who had received two to four previous lines of therapy and had a WHO performance status of 0-2. Patients were treated with oral iberdomide (1·6 mg/day on days 1-21 of each 28-day cycle), oral low-dose cyclophosphamide (50 mg/day on days 1-28), and oral dexamethasone (40 mg [20 mg in patients age >75 years] once a week) until progression. All patients received thrombosis prophylaxis daily: 80 mg oral aspirin or 100 mg oral carbasalate calcium. Patients with a previous history of venous thromboembolism received only low molecular-weight heparin by subcutaneous injection. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival, defined as time from the start of treatment to the date of progression or death. Activity and safety were assessed in all patients who started treatment. This trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04392037) and is ongoing.
Findings: Between Feb 17, 2021, and July 7, 2023, 61 patients were enrolled and received IberCd treatment (29 [48%] were female and 32 [52%] patients were male). The median number of previous lines of therapy was 3 (range 2-5); 52 (85%) patients were triple-class exposed and 27 (44%) had triple-class refractory disease. 50 patients discontinued study treatment, 39 of whom due to progressive disease, but all 61 patients were included in the main analysis population. After a median follow-up of 25·4 months (IQR 19·7-31·6), the median progression-free survival was 17·6 months (one-sided 95% CI 16·6-19·9). In all 61 patients, the most common grade 3-4 adverse events were neutropenia (34 [56%] patients) and infections (21 [34%] patients). Treatment-related serious adverse events were reported in 25 (41%) patients, with infections being the most common (34 [71%] of 48 serious adverse events). Treatment-related death occurred in one (2%) patient due to COVID-19.
Interpretation: IberCd is an all-oral and active combination for patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma that showed clinically meaningful activity. This regimen offers a valuable treatment option for patients who have received two to four previous lines of therapy and compares favourably with other available treatments.
{"title":"Iberdomide plus low-dose cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone in patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (the ICON study): a multicentre, single-arm, phase 2 trial.","authors":"Charlotte L B M Korst, Wouter Plattel, Elizabeth A de Kort, Febe Smits, Alexandra J Croockewit, Mark-David Levin, Matthijs Westerman, Okke de Weerdt, Inger S Nijhof, Jurgen Wegman, Nina Smit, Christie P M Verkleij, Tuna Mutis, Kazem Nasserinejad, Ramses Kerstiens, Marjolein van der Klift, Laurens E Franssen, Maaike E M de Ruijter, Kaz Groen, Ellen van der Spek, Wilfried W H Roeloffzen, Sonja Zweegman, Niels W C J van de Donk","doi":"10.1016/S2352-3026(25)00298-4","DOIUrl":"10.1016/S2352-3026(25)00298-4","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Iberdomide is an oral cereblon E3 ligase modulator with higher affinity to cereblon than immunomodulatory drugs, leading to improved direct anti-myeloma activity and enhanced immunostimulatory effects. We aimed to evaluate the safety and activity of iberdomide plus low-dose cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone (IberCd) in patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The ICON study is a prospective, single-arm, phase 2, open-label study conducted in eight hospitals in the Netherlands. We enrolled patients (aged ≥18 years) with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (lenalidomide-refractory) who had received two to four previous lines of therapy and had a WHO performance status of 0-2. Patients were treated with oral iberdomide (1·6 mg/day on days 1-21 of each 28-day cycle), oral low-dose cyclophosphamide (50 mg/day on days 1-28), and oral dexamethasone (40 mg [20 mg in patients age >75 years] once a week) until progression. All patients received thrombosis prophylaxis daily: 80 mg oral aspirin or 100 mg oral carbasalate calcium. Patients with a previous history of venous thromboembolism received only low molecular-weight heparin by subcutaneous injection. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival, defined as time from the start of treatment to the date of progression or death. Activity and safety were assessed in all patients who started treatment. This trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04392037) and is ongoing.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Between Feb 17, 2021, and July 7, 2023, 61 patients were enrolled and received IberCd treatment (29 [48%] were female and 32 [52%] patients were male). The median number of previous lines of therapy was 3 (range 2-5); 52 (85%) patients were triple-class exposed and 27 (44%) had triple-class refractory disease. 50 patients discontinued study treatment, 39 of whom due to progressive disease, but all 61 patients were included in the main analysis population. After a median follow-up of 25·4 months (IQR 19·7-31·6), the median progression-free survival was 17·6 months (one-sided 95% CI 16·6-19·9). In all 61 patients, the most common grade 3-4 adverse events were neutropenia (34 [56%] patients) and infections (21 [34%] patients). Treatment-related serious adverse events were reported in 25 (41%) patients, with infections being the most common (34 [71%] of 48 serious adverse events). Treatment-related death occurred in one (2%) patient due to COVID-19.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>IberCd is an all-oral and active combination for patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma that showed clinically meaningful activity. This regimen offers a valuable treatment option for patients who have received two to four previous lines of therapy and compares favourably with other available treatments.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>Bristol Myers Squibb.</p>","PeriodicalId":48726,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Haematology","volume":"13 1","pages":"e30-e40"},"PeriodicalIF":17.7,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145893322","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-01DOI: 10.1016/S2352-3026(25)00256-X
Meletios A Dimopoulos, Meral Beksac, Ludek Pour, Sosana Delimpasi, Vladimir Vorobyev, Hang Quach, Ivan Spicka, Jakub Radocha, Paweł Robak, Kihyun Kim, Michele Cavo, Kazuhito Suzuki, Jodie Wilkes, Simon McNamara, Amy Phillips-Jones, Kristin Morris, Farrah Pompilus, Molly Purser, Neal Sule, Brandon Kremer, Angely Loubert, Laurine Bunod, Manal M'Hari, Xiaoou L Zhou, Giulia Fulci, María-Victoria Mateos, Suzanne Trudel
<p><strong>Background: </strong>In the DREAMM-8 trial, belantamab mafodotin, pomalidomide, and dexamethasone demonstrated a statistically significant reduction in the risk of progression or death compared with bortezomib, pomalidomide, and dexamethasone in lenalidomide-exposed patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. We present patient-reported outcomes from this trial.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This phase 3, open-label, randomised controlled trial was done in 95 sites in 18 countries. Eligible patients were adults aged 18 years or older with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma per International Myeloma Working Group criteria, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-2, and previous treatment with at least one line of therapy that included lenalidomide. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) by a central interactive response technology system to receive 28-day cycles of intravenous belantamab mafodotin (2·5 mg/kg on day 1 of cycle 1 and 1·9 mg/kg on day 1 of cycle 2 onward) combined with oral pomalidomide (4 mg on days 1 to 21) and oral dexamethasone (40 mg on days 1, 8, 15, and 22; belantamab mafodotin group) or 21-day cycles of subcutaneous bortezomib (1·3 mg/m<sup>2</sup> on days 1, 4, 8, and 11 of cycles 1-8 and days 1 and 8 of cycle 9 onward) combined with pomalidomide and dexamethasone at the same doses and schedules as the belantamab mafodotin group; bortezomib group). Treatment continued until the occurrence of progressive disease, unacceptable adverse effects, withdrawal of consent, or death (whichever occurred first). Secondary patient-reported outcome endpoints were change from baseline in health-related quality of life (HRQOL), measured by the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30, EORTC QLQ-MY20, and Patient-Reported Outcomes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE). Ocular Surface Disease Index and Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Item GP5 results were assessed similarly as exploratory endpoints. EORTC QLQ-C30 and EORTC QLQ-MY20 disease symptom domain results were analysed in the intent-to-treat population, and PRO-CTCAE results were analysed in the safety population (patients who received at least one dose of study treatment). For all patient-reported outcome assessments, proportions included the number and percentage of patients with available data, and changes from baseline were summarised as means with 95% CIs at each timepoint. This trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04484623, and is ongoing.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Between Oct 12, 2020, and Dec 26, 2022, 382 patients were assessed for eligibility. 80 patients were excluded and 302 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to either the belantamab mafodotin group (n=155) or bortezomib group (n=147). The median age in the whole population was 66·1 years (SD 9·31). 181 (60%) of 302 patients were male and 260 (86%) were White. At the primary
{"title":"Patient-reported outcomes with belantamab mafodotin, pomalidomide, and dexamethasone versus bortezomib, pomalidomide, and dexamethasone in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (DREAMM-8): a phase 3, open-label, randomised controlled trial.","authors":"Meletios A Dimopoulos, Meral Beksac, Ludek Pour, Sosana Delimpasi, Vladimir Vorobyev, Hang Quach, Ivan Spicka, Jakub Radocha, Paweł Robak, Kihyun Kim, Michele Cavo, Kazuhito Suzuki, Jodie Wilkes, Simon McNamara, Amy Phillips-Jones, Kristin Morris, Farrah Pompilus, Molly Purser, Neal Sule, Brandon Kremer, Angely Loubert, Laurine Bunod, Manal M'Hari, Xiaoou L Zhou, Giulia Fulci, María-Victoria Mateos, Suzanne Trudel","doi":"10.1016/S2352-3026(25)00256-X","DOIUrl":"10.1016/S2352-3026(25)00256-X","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In the DREAMM-8 trial, belantamab mafodotin, pomalidomide, and dexamethasone demonstrated a statistically significant reduction in the risk of progression or death compared with bortezomib, pomalidomide, and dexamethasone in lenalidomide-exposed patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. We present patient-reported outcomes from this trial.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This phase 3, open-label, randomised controlled trial was done in 95 sites in 18 countries. Eligible patients were adults aged 18 years or older with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma per International Myeloma Working Group criteria, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-2, and previous treatment with at least one line of therapy that included lenalidomide. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) by a central interactive response technology system to receive 28-day cycles of intravenous belantamab mafodotin (2·5 mg/kg on day 1 of cycle 1 and 1·9 mg/kg on day 1 of cycle 2 onward) combined with oral pomalidomide (4 mg on days 1 to 21) and oral dexamethasone (40 mg on days 1, 8, 15, and 22; belantamab mafodotin group) or 21-day cycles of subcutaneous bortezomib (1·3 mg/m<sup>2</sup> on days 1, 4, 8, and 11 of cycles 1-8 and days 1 and 8 of cycle 9 onward) combined with pomalidomide and dexamethasone at the same doses and schedules as the belantamab mafodotin group; bortezomib group). Treatment continued until the occurrence of progressive disease, unacceptable adverse effects, withdrawal of consent, or death (whichever occurred first). Secondary patient-reported outcome endpoints were change from baseline in health-related quality of life (HRQOL), measured by the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30, EORTC QLQ-MY20, and Patient-Reported Outcomes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE). Ocular Surface Disease Index and Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Item GP5 results were assessed similarly as exploratory endpoints. EORTC QLQ-C30 and EORTC QLQ-MY20 disease symptom domain results were analysed in the intent-to-treat population, and PRO-CTCAE results were analysed in the safety population (patients who received at least one dose of study treatment). For all patient-reported outcome assessments, proportions included the number and percentage of patients with available data, and changes from baseline were summarised as means with 95% CIs at each timepoint. This trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04484623, and is ongoing.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Between Oct 12, 2020, and Dec 26, 2022, 382 patients were assessed for eligibility. 80 patients were excluded and 302 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to either the belantamab mafodotin group (n=155) or bortezomib group (n=147). The median age in the whole population was 66·1 years (SD 9·31). 181 (60%) of 302 patients were male and 260 (86%) were White. At the primary ","PeriodicalId":48726,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Haematology","volume":"12 11","pages":"e876-e886"},"PeriodicalIF":17.7,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145453813","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}