Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology最新文献

Pancreatic cancer serves as the third leading cause of cancer-associated morbidity and mortality in the United States, with a 5-year survival rate of only 12% with an expected increase in incidence and mortality in the coming years. Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas constitute most pancreatic malignancies. Certain genetic syndromes, including Lynch syndrome, hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome, hereditary pancreatitis, familial adenomatous polyposis, Peutz-Jeghers syndrome, familial pancreatic cancer mutation, and ataxia telangiectasia, confer a significantly higher risk. Screening for pancreatic malignancies currently targets patients with germline mutations or those with significant family history. Screening the general population is not currently viable owing to overall low incidence and lack of specific tests. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) and its applied advances are increasingly being used for surveillance, diagnosis, and management of pancreatic malignancies and have now become an indispensable tool in their management. For patients with risk factors, EUS in combination with magnetic resonance imaging/magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography is used for screening. The role of endoscopic modalities has been expanding with the increased utilization of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, EUS-directed therapies include EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration and EUS-fine-needle biopsy (FNB). EUS combined with FNB has the highest specificity and sensitivity for detecting pancreatic cancer amongst available modalities. Studies also recognize that artificial intelligence assisted EUS in the early detection of pancreatic cancer. At the same time, surgical resection has been historically considered the only curative treatment for pancreatic cancer, over 80% of patients present with unresectable disease. We also discuss EUS-guided therapies of physicochemicals (radiofrequency ablation, brachytherapy, and intratumor chemotherapy), biological agents (gene therapies and oncolytic viruses), and immunotherapy. We aim to perform a detailed review of the current burden, risk factors, role of screening, diagnosis, and endoscopic advances in the treatment modalities available for pancreatic cancer.

Background: Prucalopride (1 or 2 mg once daily) is approved for treating adults with chronic idiopathic constipation (CIC).

Objectives: We determined the effect of age, body mass index (BMI), and renal function on the efficacy and safety of prucalopride in adults with CIC.

Design: Data were pooled from six 12-week, phase III-IV clinical studies in adults who received prucalopride (1 or 2 mg once daily) or placebo for CIC.

Methods: Adults were stratified by age (<50; 50-64; ⩾65 years), BMI (underweight/healthy weight, <25 kg/m²; overweight, 25 to <30 kg/m²; obese, ⩾30 kg/m²), and renal function (normal renal function, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) ⩾90 mL/min/1.73 m²; mild renal impairment, eGFR 60 to <90 mL/min/1.73 m²; moderate renal impairment, eGFR 30 to <60 mL/min/1.73 m²). The primary efficacy endpoint was the proportion of patients with a mean of ⩾3 complete spontaneous bowel movements/week over 12 weeks. Safety data were evaluated descriptively.

Results: Of 2484 patients stratified by age (prucalopride, n = 1237; placebo, n = 1247), 1402, 708, and 374 were aged <50, 50-64, and ⩾65 years, respectively. Of 2482 patients stratified by BMI (prucalopride, n = 1237; placebo, n = 1245), 1425, 713, and 344 were underweight/healthy weight, overweight, and obese, respectively. Of 2474 patients stratified by renal function (prucalopride, n = 1233; placebo, n = 1241), 1444, 869, and 161 had normal renal function, mild renal impairment, and moderate renal impairment, respectively. More prucalopride-treated than placebo-treated patients achieved the primary efficacy endpoint. The difference was significant for all subgroups, except for the obese and moderate renal impairment subgroups. More prucalopride-treated than placebo-treated patients reported treatment-related adverse events in most subgroups.

Conclusion: Prucalopride demonstrated efficacy in adults with CIC, irrespective of age, BMI, and renal function. No unexpected safety concerns were identified.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers (https://clinicaltrials.gov/): NCT01147926, NCT01424228, NCT01116206, NCT00483886, NCT00485940, NCT00488137.

Over the last 40 years, the role of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) has evolved from being diagnostic to therapeutic. EUS-guided gallbladder drainage (EUS-GBD) and EUS-guided gastroenterostomy (EUS-GE) are emerging techniques in recent years; however, there are limited studies and inconsistent results regarding these techniques. In addition, EUS has become a more common alternative to traditional interventions due to its super minimally invasive nature, but the mobility of both the gallbladder and intestine makes it challenging to introduce stents. An increasing number of researchers are dedicating themselves to solving this problem, leading to the development of various assisted technologies. Consequently, this review focused on the comparison of EUS-GBD and EUS-GE with other alternative approaches and explored the various assisted techniques employed for EUS-GBD and EUS-GE.

Background: Data regarding multiple switches including reverse switching between infliximab and its biosimilars are scarce in the field of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD).

Objectives: We investigated the clinical effectiveness as primary outcome measure after repeated switches. Secondary endpoints included C-reactive protein (CRP) levels, immunogenicity (trough levels (TL); anti-drug antibodies (ADA), safety and drug persistence.

Design: This study is a prospective, single-centre, observational cohort study. IBD patients receiving originator infliximab were switched to biosimilar SB2 and then reverse switched after 96 weeks and followed up for another 48 weeks.

Methods: Clinical disease activity (Harvey-Bradshaw-index (HBI) in Crohn's disease (CD), partial Mayo score (pMS) in ulcerative colitis (UC)), CRP, TL, ADA, therapy-discontinuations and (serious) adverse events ((S)AE)) were monitored throughout the study.

Results: Ninety-five patients (60 CD, 38 female) were enrolled. The median HBI was 2 (interquartile range (IQR) 1-4) at baseline and 2 (1-4) at week 48, resulting in a mean intra-individual change of 0.0 (standard deviation (SD) 1.5). The median pMS was 1 (IQR 0-1) at baseline and 0.5 (0-1) at week 48 resulting in a mean intra-individual change of 0.0 (SD 0.8). Clinical remission was achieved in 80% at baseline and 82% at week 48. Median CRP 2.0 mg/l (IQR 1.0-4.1) at baseline and 2.4 mg/l (1.1-5.2) at week 48 resulted in a mean change of 1.7 (SD 5.8) and no significant differences in CD (p = 0.3) and UC (p = 0.9). Median TL were 7.2 µg/ml (IQR 3.8-19.3) at baseline and 5.5 µg/ml (3.5-13.1) at week 48, resulting in a mean change of -1.0 (SD 7.4) with no statistical significance (CD p = 0.26, UC p = 0.41). De-novo-ADA were developed by 3.4%. The discontinuation rate was 14.7%. Safety signals were consistent with previous studies.

Conclusion: Reverse switching had no impact on efficacy of infliximab therapy in our cohort of IBD patients. The switch didn't influence immunogenicity or safety of therapy.

Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a chronic inflammatory bowel disease characterized by growing incidence and prevalence around the world in the last few decades. The range of available existing treatment and strategies for its management is being implemented. Given the introduction of newly developed molecules and the lack of specific guidelines, drug positioning may represent a tough clinical challenge. UC management is mostly medical, and it has been shifting toward a more personalized approach with the aim to create a tailored strategy depending on the patient's profile. A treat-to target strategy seems to be the best approach to reach disease control as it allows to carry out therapeutic choices based on objective and specific parameters: histological, ultrasonographic, and molecular targets may add to the already used clinical, endoscopic, and biochemical targets. In addition, dual-targeted therapy has emerged as an attractive therapeutic strategy for patients not achieving remission. This review aims to provide an overview of the available strategies to raise the bar in UC.

The intestine, as a crucial organ of the human body, has remained enigmatic despite the remarkable advancements in modern medical technology. Over the past decades, the invention of endoscopic technology has made the noninvasive intervention of the intestine a reality, expanding diagnostic and therapeutic options for diseases. However, due to the single-treatment feature of endoscopic procedures, continuous or repeated medication administration, sampling, and decompression drainage within the intestine have yet to be fulfilled. These limitations persisted until the invention of colonic transendoscopic enteral tubing (TET) in 2014, which realized repeated fecal microbiota transplantation, medication administration, and decompression drainage for the treatment of colon perforation and intestinal obstruction, as well as in situ dynamic sampling. These breakthroughs have not gone unnoticed, gaining global attention and recommendations from guidelines and consensuses. TET has emerged as a novel microbial research tool that offers new paradigms for human microbiome research. This review aims to update the research progress based on TET.

Background: The acute and chronic pancreatitis (CP) can lead to severe complications like walled-off necrosis, large symptomatic pseudocyst or multiorgan failure. The treatment of these complications is multivariate and can differ from conservative, symptomatic treatment or minimal-invasive, endoscopic transgastral stenting to transgastral necrosectomy.

Objectives: This study aims to analyse the clinical course for patients that develop local complications of severe pancreatitis.

Design: This is a retrospective observational single-centre study on 46 patients with severe pancreatitis.

Methods: In this retrospective single-centre study, 46 out of 474 inpatients from January 2014 to December 2020, who were treated because of an acute or CP, developed acute pancreatitis complications and could be included. We analysed and compared the clinical course of different treatments (lumen apposing metal stents, transgastral double pigtail stent, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, operation, conservative treatment) and different complications (walled-off necrosis (WON), pancreatic pseudocyst (PPC)).

Results: Forty-six patients developed an acute complication due to severe pancreatitis. Twenty-seven patients developed a WON, while 19 patients suffered from PPC. 48% of the whole cohort had an alcoholic aetiology of pancreatitis. 78% were treated with antibiotics, 48% suffered from infected pancreatitis and 22% needed intensive care treatment. WON patients more often had a longer hospitalization of more than 21 days. PPC patients were correlated with an alcoholic aetiology, whereas WON patients were inversely correlated with an alcoholic aetiology. Increased lactate dehydrogenase, lipase, and C-reactive protein levels as well as leucocyte count could be associated with a higher probability to exhibit a WON instead of another local complication. The mortality rate was low with 7% in our study.

Conclusion: WON and PPC differ in certain patients and laboratory characteristics such as aetiology, elevated laboratory values, antibiotic treatment or the duration of hospitalization. Invasive treatment is not required in all severe pancreatitis cases.

Background: Patients with HER2-negative locally advanced or unresectable metastatic gastric cancer and gastroesophageal junction (G/GEJ) adenocarcinoma have limited first-line treatment options and a poor prognosis. The GLOW clinical trial showed that zolbetuximab plus capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (CAPOX) significantly prolonged these patients' overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS).

Objectives: This study evaluated the cost-effectiveness of zolbetuximab plus CAPOX as a first-line treatment for HER2-negative locally advanced or unresectable metastatic G/GEJ adenocarcinoma in the United States and China.

Design: The cost-effective analysis.

Methods: Based on the GLOW clinical trial data (NCT03653507), we constructed a 10-year Markov model to assess the cost-effectiveness of the zolbetuximab or placebo plus CAPOX treatment regimen. Only direct medical costs were considered. The primary outcomes of the model were quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs). One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were employed to assess the robustness of the model.

Results: In the United States, zolbetuximab plus CAPOX added 0.24 QALYs and resulted in an incremental cost of $196,791.11 compared with placebo plus CAPOX, which had an ICER of $821,515.65 per QALY gained. For China, the zolbetuximab group gained 0.23 QALYs at an incremental cost of $62,822.69, resulting in an ICER of $273,568.01/QALY. One-way sensitivity analysis revealed that the results were most sensitive to the price of zolbetuximab. Zolbetuximab plus CAPOX had 0% cost-effectiveness at the willingness-to-pay thresholds of $150,000/QALY in the United States and $38,188/QALY in China.

Conclusion: Zolbetuximab plus CAPOX may be a cost-effective option for patients with locally advanced, unresectable, or metastatic G/GEJ adenocarcinoma when the price of zolbetuximab reduced by 83.37% ($367.7/100 mg) in the United States and 82.25% ($110.8/100 mg) in China.

Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) and psoriasis are chronic inflammatory conditions belonging to the heterogeneous group of immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs). A significant bidirectional link between these two entities has been observed, conditioning an increased risk of IBD in patients with psoriasis and vice-versa. Biological therapies used for IBD may lead to the occurrence of psoriasis as a "paradoxical reaction." The objective of this study is to analyze the current evidence on the association between psoriasis and IBD, particularly finding case reports of the appearance or aggravation of psoriasis under therapy with interleukin-12/23 (IL-12/23) and IL-23 inhibitors. We conducted comprehensive research to identify studies examining the association between psoriasis and IBD and to find case presentations that reported the appearance or aggravation of psoriasis under biologic therapy with IL-12/23 and IL-23 inhibitors up to March 2024. Clinical trials for IL-12/23 and IL-23 inhibitors in IBD were analyzed to find cases of paradoxical psoriasis as registered adverse events. The sources of evidence are PubMed and ClinicalTrials.gov. For each included case report, data on patient characteristics concerning their age, sex, and comorbidities were selected. Moreover, information regarding the indication for biologic therapy, time to onset of paradoxical psoriasis after starting treatment, clinical presentation, and management of the paradoxical psoriasis was extracted. We found 10 reported cases of ustekinumab-induced new-onset or worsening psoriasis and one reported case of paradoxical psoriasis induced by risankizumab in the literature. Four cases of paradoxical psoriasis have been also registered in clinical trials involving ustekinumab treatment in IBD. Psoriasis can constitute a rare paradoxical adverse event of ustekinumab treatment, but further studies are needed to better clarify the cytokine imbalance that leads to this phenomenon induced by inhibition of IL-12/23 and IL-23. Still, few real-world data exist to draw any conclusions, but risankizumab may positively treat psoriasis induced by ustekinumab.