In 2019, a global meta-analysis demonstrated incidence of 3.9% for chorioamnionitis, 1.6% for endometritis, 1.2% for wound infection, 0.05% for sepsis, and 1.1% for maternal peripartum infection (Woodd et al. in PLOS Med 16(12):e1002984, 2019). Antimicrobial regimens for these infections are based on older microbiology profiles and may not account for changes in antimicrobial susceptibility data or the availability more modern antimicrobial therapies.
Recent Findings
Recommendations for treatment of puerperal infection have not changed significantly in recent decades, despite the availability of new antimicrobial therapies with improved safety profiles.
Summary
A consideration should be given to monotherapy or two-drug regimens that have fewer toxicities than older therapeutics and require less monitoring. Obtaining appropriate microbiologic data and antimicrobial susceptibility data is critical to balance broad-spectrum coverage with the threat of antimicrobial resistance.
综述目的2019年,一项全球荟萃分析显示,绒毛膜羊膜炎的发病率为3.9%,子宫内膜炎的发病率为1.6%,伤口感染的发病率为1.2%,败血症的发病率为0.05%,产妇围产期感染的发病率为1.1%(Woodd等人,发表于PLOS Med 16(12):e1002984,2019年)。这些感染的抗菌治疗方案基于较早的微生物学资料,可能没有考虑到抗菌药物敏感性数据的变化或更多现代抗菌疗法的可用性。最近的研究结果尽管有安全性更好的新型抗菌疗法可用,但近几十年来产褥感染的治疗建议并没有显著变化。获得适当的微生物学数据和抗菌药物敏感性数据对于平衡广谱疗法和抗菌药物耐药性威胁至关重要。
{"title":"Out with the Old, In with the New: A Review of the Treatment of Intrapartum Infections","authors":"Pamela Bailey, Lance Schacht, Grace Pazienza, Patricia Seal, Amy Crockett, Julie Ann Justo","doi":"10.1007/s11908-024-00838-8","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11908-024-00838-8","url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Purpose of Review</h3><p>In 2019, a global meta-analysis demonstrated incidence of 3.9% for chorioamnionitis, 1.6% for endometritis, 1.2% for wound infection, 0.05% for sepsis, and 1.1% for maternal peripartum infection (Woodd et al. in PLOS Med 16(12):e1002984, 2019). Antimicrobial regimens for these infections are based on older microbiology profiles and may not account for changes in antimicrobial susceptibility data or the availability more modern antimicrobial therapies.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Recent Findings</h3><p>Recommendations for treatment of puerperal infection have not changed significantly in recent decades, despite the availability of new antimicrobial therapies with improved safety profiles.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Summary</h3><p>A consideration should be given to monotherapy or two-drug regimens that have fewer toxicities than older therapeutics and require less monitoring. Obtaining appropriate microbiologic data and antimicrobial susceptibility data is critical to balance broad-spectrum coverage with the threat of antimicrobial resistance.</p>","PeriodicalId":48839,"journal":{"name":"Current Infectious Disease Reports","volume":"30 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2024-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139648120","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Septic coagulopathy is a complex disorder linked with multiple organ dysfunction and increased mortality, and definitive treatments are still lacking. This review summarizes the current understanding of septic coagulopathy, covering its pathophysiology, diagnosis, and debatable treatment approaches. Additionally, it provides a thorough overview of recent research and emerging trends in this area.
Recent Findings
Recent studies have highlighted the interplay between coagulation mechanisms in sepsis and inflammatory response. Diagnostic tools include the newly published scoring system for sepsis-induced coagulopathy and the existing scoring systems for disseminated intravascular coagulation, enhancing early detection and treatment. Several drugs targeting abnormal clotting have been investigated in septic coagulopathy or wider septic groups, including heparin, antithrombin, activated protein C, and human-soluble thrombomodulin. However, they have not yielded clear survival benefits. Nonetheless, recent studies indicate that some of those therapies may benefit specific groups with septic coagulopathy, emphasizing the growing interest in emerging biomarkers and precision medicine to enhance patient outcomes.
Summary
Despite recent advancements, no pharmaceutical intervention is currently endorsed for septic coagulopathy. However, a noted association exists between disseminated intravascular coagulation and unfavorable prognosis. Future research is imperative, especially in devising individualized treatment strategies tailored to each patient’s condition.
综述目的脓毒症凝血病是一种复杂的疾病,与多器官功能障碍和死亡率增加有关,目前仍缺乏明确的治疗方法。本综述总结了目前对脓毒症凝血病的认识,涵盖其病理生理学、诊断和备受争议的治疗方法。最近的研究强调了脓毒症和炎症反应中凝血机制之间的相互作用。诊断工具包括新出版的脓毒症诱发凝血病评分系统和现有的弥散性血管内凝血评分系统,从而加强了早期检测和治疗。针对脓毒症凝血病或更广泛的脓毒症群体,已经研究了多种针对凝血异常的药物,包括肝素、抗凝血酶、活化蛋白 C 和人溶性血栓调节蛋白。然而,这些药物并没有为患者带来明显的生存益处。尽管如此,最近的研究表明,其中一些疗法可能会使特定的脓毒症凝血病群体受益,这凸显了人们对新兴生物标志物和精准医疗以提高患者预后的兴趣与日俱增。然而,弥散性血管内凝血与不良预后之间存在着明显的关联。未来的研究势在必行,尤其是针对每位患者的病情制定个性化的治疗策略。
{"title":"Septic Coagulopathy: Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, and Therapeutic Strategies","authors":"Toshiyuki Karumai, Yuki Kotani, Ryohei Yamamoto, Mayuko Tonai, Yoshiro Hayashi","doi":"10.1007/s11908-024-00833-z","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11908-024-00833-z","url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Purpose of Review</h3><p>Septic coagulopathy is a complex disorder linked with multiple organ dysfunction and increased mortality, and definitive treatments are still lacking. This review summarizes the current understanding of septic coagulopathy, covering its pathophysiology, diagnosis, and debatable treatment approaches. Additionally, it provides a thorough overview of recent research and emerging trends in this area.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Recent Findings</h3><p>Recent studies have highlighted the interplay between coagulation mechanisms in sepsis and inflammatory response. Diagnostic tools include the newly published scoring system for sepsis-induced coagulopathy and the existing scoring systems for disseminated intravascular coagulation, enhancing early detection and treatment. Several drugs targeting abnormal clotting have been investigated in septic coagulopathy or wider septic groups, including heparin, antithrombin, activated protein C, and human-soluble thrombomodulin. However, they have not yielded clear survival benefits. Nonetheless, recent studies indicate that some of those therapies may benefit specific groups with septic coagulopathy, emphasizing the growing interest in emerging biomarkers and precision medicine to enhance patient outcomes.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Summary</h3><p>Despite recent advancements, no pharmaceutical intervention is currently endorsed for septic coagulopathy. However, a noted association exists between disseminated intravascular coagulation and unfavorable prognosis. Future research is imperative, especially in devising individualized treatment strategies tailored to each patient’s condition.</p>","PeriodicalId":48839,"journal":{"name":"Current Infectious Disease Reports","volume":"28 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2024-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139555077","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-01-20DOI: 10.1007/s11908-024-00834-y
Niraj Bannore, Farhad Kapadia, Ashit Hegde
Purpose of Review
Over 50% of the infections in most ICUs in tertiary care centres in India are caused by difficult to treat (DTR) gram-negative bacteria. The options available for the treatment of these infections are quite limited. This review discusses the epidemiology of these DTR infections in India and explores the various treatment strategies for these infections which are relevant in an Indian setting.
Recent Findings
The most common organisms causing DTR infections in India are Klebsiella pneumoniae, Escherichia coli, Acinetobacter baumannii and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. The mechanisms of resistance in these organisms are not the same as those in DTR organisms prevalent in the western world. Treatment strategies recommended by western guidelines may not work in India. Management of these DTR organisms needs to be tailored to the situation in India.
Summary
Overuse of antibiotics has led to an alarming rate of DTR infections in Indian ICUs. The polymyxins are often the only drugs which are effective against many of these infections. Physicians in India and the government need to take urgent measures to control the spread of these organisms.