Pub Date : 2010-06-01Epub Date: 2010-01-23DOI: 10.1177/0091270009352188
Shigeru Marubashi, Hiroaki Nagano, Shogo Kobayashi, Hidetoshi Eguchi, Yutaka Takeda, Masahiro Tanemura, Koji Umeshita, Morito Monden, Yuichiro Doki, Masaki Mori
Therapeutic drug monitoring is necessary when using tacrolimus (FK) due to the associated side effects. The aim of this study was to compare the chemiluminescent assay (CMIA) system with the previously established Abbott IMx Tacrolimus II microparticle enzyme immunoassay (MEIA) in liver transplant recipients and evaluate its accuracy. Between March and June 2008, all blood samples from the liver transplant recipients at the hospital were tested for FK trough level using 2 different methods, CMIA and MEIA. The posttransplant time, hematocrit, and other clinical parameters during the study period were recorded. FK trough level was analyzed in 398 samples from 57 liver transplant recipients by CMIA and MEIA. The correlation in FK level between the 2 methods was excellent (r(2) = 0.941). However, the FK level was underestimated in MEIA by more than 23% in samples with an FK level of less than 3.5 ng/mL and by 6.8% in those with an FK level between 3.5 and 5 ng/mL. CMIA is superior to MEIA in measuring low FK level, allowing the FK level to be maintained at less than 5 ng/mL in selected liver transplant recipients. The effects of maintaining low levels of FK should be evaluated in liver transplant recipients.
{"title":"Evaluation of a new immunoassay for therapeutic drug monitoring of tacrolimus in adult liver transplant recipients.","authors":"Shigeru Marubashi, Hiroaki Nagano, Shogo Kobayashi, Hidetoshi Eguchi, Yutaka Takeda, Masahiro Tanemura, Koji Umeshita, Morito Monden, Yuichiro Doki, Masaki Mori","doi":"10.1177/0091270009352188","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0091270009352188","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Therapeutic drug monitoring is necessary when using tacrolimus (FK) due to the associated side effects. The aim of this study was to compare the chemiluminescent assay (CMIA) system with the previously established Abbott IMx Tacrolimus II microparticle enzyme immunoassay (MEIA) in liver transplant recipients and evaluate its accuracy. Between March and June 2008, all blood samples from the liver transplant recipients at the hospital were tested for FK trough level using 2 different methods, CMIA and MEIA. The posttransplant time, hematocrit, and other clinical parameters during the study period were recorded. FK trough level was analyzed in 398 samples from 57 liver transplant recipients by CMIA and MEIA. The correlation in FK level between the 2 methods was excellent (r(2) = 0.941). However, the FK level was underestimated in MEIA by more than 23% in samples with an FK level of less than 3.5 ng/mL and by 6.8% in those with an FK level between 3.5 and 5 ng/mL. CMIA is superior to MEIA in measuring low FK level, allowing the FK level to be maintained at less than 5 ng/mL in selected liver transplant recipients. The effects of maintaining low levels of FK should be evaluated in liver transplant recipients.</p>","PeriodicalId":48908,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Pharmacology","volume":"50 6","pages":"705-9"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2010-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/0091270009352188","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"28666414","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2010-04-01Epub Date: 2009-11-23DOI: 10.1177/0091270009343932
Jessie Gu, Adele Noe, Priya Chandra, Suliman Al-Fayoumi, Monica Ligueros-Saylan, Ramesh Sarangapani, Suzanne Maahs, Gary Ksander, Dean F Rigel, Arco Y Jeng, Tsu-Han Lin, Weiyi Zheng, William P Dole
Angiotensin receptor blockade and neprilysin (NEP) inhibition together offer potential benefits for the treatment of hypertension and heart failure. LCZ696 is a novel single molecule comprising molecular moieties of valsartan and NEP inhibitor prodrug AHU377 (1:1 ratio). Oral administration of LCZ696 caused dose-dependent increases in atrial natriuretic peptide immunoreactivity (due to NEP inhibition) in Sprague-Dawley rats and provided sustained, dose-dependent blood pressure reductions in hypertensive double-transgenic rats. In healthy participants, a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study (n = 80) of single-dose (200-1200 mg) and multiple-dose (50-900 mg once daily for 14 days) oral administration of LCZ696 showed that peak plasma concentrations were reached rapidly for valsartan (1.6-4.9 hours), AHU377 (0.5-1.1 hours), and its active moiety, LBQ657 (1.8-3.5 hours). LCZ696 treatment was associated with increases in plasma cGMP, renin concentration and activity, and angiotensin II, providing evidence for NEP inhibition and angiotensin receptor blockade. In a randomized, open-label crossover study in healthy participants (n = 56), oral LCZ696 400 mg and valsartan 320 mg were shown to provide similar exposure to valsartan (geometric mean ratio [90% confidence interval]: AUC(0-infinity) 0.90 [0.82-0.99]). LCZ696 was safe and well tolerated. These data support further clinical development of LCZ696, a novel, orally bioavailable, dual-acting angiotensin receptor-NEP inhibitor (ARNi) for hypertension and heart failure.
{"title":"Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of LCZ696, a novel dual-acting angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor (ARNi).","authors":"Jessie Gu, Adele Noe, Priya Chandra, Suliman Al-Fayoumi, Monica Ligueros-Saylan, Ramesh Sarangapani, Suzanne Maahs, Gary Ksander, Dean F Rigel, Arco Y Jeng, Tsu-Han Lin, Weiyi Zheng, William P Dole","doi":"10.1177/0091270009343932","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0091270009343932","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Angiotensin receptor blockade and neprilysin (NEP) inhibition together offer potential benefits for the treatment of hypertension and heart failure. LCZ696 is a novel single molecule comprising molecular moieties of valsartan and NEP inhibitor prodrug AHU377 (1:1 ratio). Oral administration of LCZ696 caused dose-dependent increases in atrial natriuretic peptide immunoreactivity (due to NEP inhibition) in Sprague-Dawley rats and provided sustained, dose-dependent blood pressure reductions in hypertensive double-transgenic rats. In healthy participants, a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study (n = 80) of single-dose (200-1200 mg) and multiple-dose (50-900 mg once daily for 14 days) oral administration of LCZ696 showed that peak plasma concentrations were reached rapidly for valsartan (1.6-4.9 hours), AHU377 (0.5-1.1 hours), and its active moiety, LBQ657 (1.8-3.5 hours). LCZ696 treatment was associated with increases in plasma cGMP, renin concentration and activity, and angiotensin II, providing evidence for NEP inhibition and angiotensin receptor blockade. In a randomized, open-label crossover study in healthy participants (n = 56), oral LCZ696 400 mg and valsartan 320 mg were shown to provide similar exposure to valsartan (geometric mean ratio [90% confidence interval]: AUC(0-infinity) 0.90 [0.82-0.99]). LCZ696 was safe and well tolerated. These data support further clinical development of LCZ696, a novel, orally bioavailable, dual-acting angiotensin receptor-NEP inhibitor (ARNi) for hypertension and heart failure.</p>","PeriodicalId":48908,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Pharmacology","volume":"50 4","pages":"401-14"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2010-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/0091270009343932","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"28524774","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2010-04-01Epub Date: 2010-01-26DOI: 10.1177/0091270009346059
Antonia Periclou, Robert H Palmer, Hongjie Zheng, Charles Lindamood
Milnacipran is approved for management of fibromyalgia in the United States. In this double-blind, placebo- and active drug-controlled study (N = 100), effects of supratherapeutic doses of milnacipran on cardiac repolarization were evaluated in healthy volunteers. The primary outcome was the largest mean difference between milnacipran and placebo in time-matched baseline-adjusted QT interval corrected for heart rate using an individual correction formula (QTcNi). In addition, data were analyzed using the Fridericia formula (QTcF) and a post hoc piecewise QTcNi analysis based on a dichotomous cut of RR interval data at 800 ms. Moxifloxacin (400 mg single dose) was used to establish assay sensitivity. Using the QTcNi method, the largest difference in baseline-adjusted QTcNi between milnacipran 300 mg bid and placebo was -4.7 ms (90% confidence interval [CI]: -9.4 to -0.1), indicating no QT prolongation. Analysis using the Fridericia formula (QTcF) showed a maximum adjusted mean change of +7.7 ms, but QTcF versus RR interval plots indicated overcorrection with this method. The piecewise QTcNi correction method demonstrated a more accurate correction for drug-induced heart rate increase; mean baseline-adjusted between-group difference was +0.9 ms (90% CI: -6.6 to 8.3). The results suggest that milnacipran would not significantly affect cardiac repolarization at clinically relevant therapeutic and supratherapeutic concentrations.
{"title":"Effects of milnacipran on cardiac repolarization in healthy participants.","authors":"Antonia Periclou, Robert H Palmer, Hongjie Zheng, Charles Lindamood","doi":"10.1177/0091270009346059","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0091270009346059","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Milnacipran is approved for management of fibromyalgia in the United States. In this double-blind, placebo- and active drug-controlled study (N = 100), effects of supratherapeutic doses of milnacipran on cardiac repolarization were evaluated in healthy volunteers. The primary outcome was the largest mean difference between milnacipran and placebo in time-matched baseline-adjusted QT interval corrected for heart rate using an individual correction formula (QTcNi). In addition, data were analyzed using the Fridericia formula (QTcF) and a post hoc piecewise QTcNi analysis based on a dichotomous cut of RR interval data at 800 ms. Moxifloxacin (400 mg single dose) was used to establish assay sensitivity. Using the QTcNi method, the largest difference in baseline-adjusted QTcNi between milnacipran 300 mg bid and placebo was -4.7 ms (90% confidence interval [CI]: -9.4 to -0.1), indicating no QT prolongation. Analysis using the Fridericia formula (QTcF) showed a maximum adjusted mean change of +7.7 ms, but QTcF versus RR interval plots indicated overcorrection with this method. The piecewise QTcNi correction method demonstrated a more accurate correction for drug-induced heart rate increase; mean baseline-adjusted between-group difference was +0.9 ms (90% CI: -6.6 to 8.3). The results suggest that milnacipran would not significantly affect cardiac repolarization at clinically relevant therapeutic and supratherapeutic concentrations.</p>","PeriodicalId":48908,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Pharmacology","volume":"50 4","pages":"422-33"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2010-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/0091270009346059","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"28671642","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2010-04-01Epub Date: 2010-01-20DOI: 10.1177/0091270009352484
Maurice Lippmann, Abhishek Karnwal, Inderjeet S Julka
W read with interest the article by Aroni et al with regard to the reevaluation of an old drug, ketamine, and its uses. The authors' article deals with ketamine in normal, healthy patients, in whom it is commonly used as an analgesic and anesthetic induction agent. We applaud the authors' insights, which appear to be positive in nature about the drug. What the authors did not portray is this drug's not uncommon negative effect, especially with regard to the cardiovascular system. Ketamine, a phencyclindine derivative, mediates its effects by acting on different sites. While the N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA)-receptor antagonism and opiate receptor effects contribute to the analgesic state, sympathomimetic properties are mediated by enhanced monoaminergic transmission, producing increases in heart rate, cardiac output, and blood pressure. Ketamine also causes increases in circulating catecholamine concentration by reducing its neuronal uptake. This leads to further stimulation of the sympathetic nervous system. In our experience, prolonged critical illness in patients results in catecholamine depletion, and the drug may cause hypotension resulting in inadequate tissue oxygenation. In a preliminary study by Waxman et al, a single intravenous dose of ketamine for anesthesia led to reduced left ventricular stroke work index in 6 of 12 severely ill patients. Based on that study, Lippmann et al carried out a detailed study and found that in critically ill patients (ie, patients in shock with sepsis who were hypovolemic and stressed preoperatively), ketamine did not always increase heart rate and blood pressure, as is often seen in the healthy young patients. These authors concluded that in patients with limited myocardial reserve and increased demand, ketamine may decrease cardiac output. Because ketamine is being suggested as the drug of choice to anesthetize patients in prehospital and disaster settings such as battlefield conflicts and earthquakes, surgeons and anesthesiologists should be made aware of ketamine's possible downside.
{"title":"Cardiovascular effects of ketamine in sick patients: should physicians be concerned?","authors":"Maurice Lippmann, Abhishek Karnwal, Inderjeet S Julka","doi":"10.1177/0091270009352484","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0091270009352484","url":null,"abstract":"W read with interest the article by Aroni et al with regard to the reevaluation of an old drug, ketamine, and its uses. The authors' article deals with ketamine in normal, healthy patients, in whom it is commonly used as an analgesic and anesthetic induction agent. We applaud the authors' insights, which appear to be positive in nature about the drug. What the authors did not portray is this drug's not uncommon negative effect, especially with regard to the cardiovascular system. Ketamine, a phencyclindine derivative, mediates its effects by acting on different sites. While the N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA)-receptor antagonism and opiate receptor effects contribute to the analgesic state, sympathomimetic properties are mediated by enhanced monoaminergic transmission, producing increases in heart rate, cardiac output, and blood pressure. Ketamine also causes increases in circulating catecholamine concentration by reducing its neuronal uptake. This leads to further stimulation of the sympathetic nervous system. In our experience, prolonged critical illness in patients results in catecholamine depletion, and the drug may cause hypotension resulting in inadequate tissue oxygenation. In a preliminary study by Waxman et al, a single intravenous dose of ketamine for anesthesia led to reduced left ventricular stroke work index in 6 of 12 severely ill patients. Based on that study, Lippmann et al carried out a detailed study and found that in critically ill patients (ie, patients in shock with sepsis who were hypovolemic and stressed preoperatively), ketamine did not always increase heart rate and blood pressure, as is often seen in the healthy young patients. These authors concluded that in patients with limited myocardial reserve and increased demand, ketamine may decrease cardiac output. Because ketamine is being suggested as the drug of choice to anesthetize patients in prehospital and disaster settings such as battlefield conflicts and earthquakes, surgeons and anesthesiologists should be made aware of ketamine's possible downside.","PeriodicalId":48908,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Pharmacology","volume":"50 4","pages":"482"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2010-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/0091270009352484","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"28660283","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2010-04-01Epub Date: 2010-01-23DOI: 10.1177/0091270009339739
Martin S Rhee, James A Hellinger, Sandy Sheble-Hall, Calvin J Cohen, David J Greenblatt
The relationship between plasma protease inhibitor (PI) trough concentrations and hyperlipidemic effects were evaluated retrospectively using data from 2 pilot clinical trials of a double-boosted PI regimen (saquinavir/lopinavir/ritonavir) in 25 HIV patients. The patients' median age was 39 years (range, 25-60). At baseline, PI-naive patients had a median viral load of 53 500 copies/mL and median CD4 of 296 cells/mm(3), while PI-experienced patients had 37 750 copies/mL and 214 cells/mm(3). Plasma PI trough concentrations of saquinavir, lopinavir, and ritonavir at week 12 were 520, 4482, and 153 ng/mL, respectively. At week 12, median fasting lipids increased significantly from baseline: total cholesterol increased from 165 to 189 mg/dL (P = .0005) and the triglyceride increased from 113 to 159 mg/dL (P = .001). There were no associations between PI trough concentrations at week 12 and the percent total cholesterol change at week 12. No associations were found between PI trough concentrations and lipid changes in HIV patients on a double-boosted PI regimen (saquinavir/lopinavir/ritonavir). Factors other than systemic exposure to PIs (such as host or genetic factors) may modulate the hyperlipidemic effect of PIs.
{"title":"Relationship between plasma protease inhibitor concentrations and lipid elevations in HIV patients on a double-boosted protease inhibitor regimen (saquinavir/lopinavir/ritonavir).","authors":"Martin S Rhee, James A Hellinger, Sandy Sheble-Hall, Calvin J Cohen, David J Greenblatt","doi":"10.1177/0091270009339739","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0091270009339739","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The relationship between plasma protease inhibitor (PI) trough concentrations and hyperlipidemic effects were evaluated retrospectively using data from 2 pilot clinical trials of a double-boosted PI regimen (saquinavir/lopinavir/ritonavir) in 25 HIV patients. The patients' median age was 39 years (range, 25-60). At baseline, PI-naive patients had a median viral load of 53 500 copies/mL and median CD4 of 296 cells/mm(3), while PI-experienced patients had 37 750 copies/mL and 214 cells/mm(3). Plasma PI trough concentrations of saquinavir, lopinavir, and ritonavir at week 12 were 520, 4482, and 153 ng/mL, respectively. At week 12, median fasting lipids increased significantly from baseline: total cholesterol increased from 165 to 189 mg/dL (P = .0005) and the triglyceride increased from 113 to 159 mg/dL (P = .001). There were no associations between PI trough concentrations at week 12 and the percent total cholesterol change at week 12. No associations were found between PI trough concentrations and lipid changes in HIV patients on a double-boosted PI regimen (saquinavir/lopinavir/ritonavir). Factors other than systemic exposure to PIs (such as host or genetic factors) may modulate the hyperlipidemic effect of PIs.</p>","PeriodicalId":48908,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Pharmacology","volume":"50 4","pages":"392-400"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2010-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/0091270009339739","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"28666413","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2010-04-01Epub Date: 2010-01-16DOI: 10.1177/0091270009338940
Douglas L Jennings, James S Kalus
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of adding cilostazol to dual antiplatelet therapy (aspirin and thienopyridine) on rates of restenosis after coronary artery stenting. A meta-analysis is conducted of randomized, controlled trials comparing 3 drug regimens (cilostazol, thienopyridine, aspirin [triple therapy]) with dual antiplatelet therapy to reduce restenosis after coronary stenting. A total of 5 studies are included for analysis. The analysis reveals that triple therapy is used in 796 patients, whereas dual therapy is used in 801 patients. Approximately 56% of patients receive a drug-eluting stent. The 6-month restenosis rates are significantly lower with triple versus dual antiplatelet therapy (12.7% vs 21.9%; odds ratio 0.5; 95% confidence interval, 0.38-0.66; P < .001). This benefit is seen regardless of whether a bare-metal or drug-eluting stent is used. Rates of major adverse cardiac events and bleeding are reported for 3 of the 5 studies (n = 1426); analysis of these outcomes shows no difference between treatment groups (P = .21 and .48, respectively). The addition of cilostazol to standard dual antiplatelet therapy reduces angiographic restenosis and increases MLD at 6 months without significantly affecting rates of major adverse cardiac events or bleeding.
本研究的目的是评估在双重抗血小板治疗(阿司匹林和噻吩吡啶)中添加西洛他唑对冠状动脉支架植入术后再狭窄发生率的影响。对三种药物方案(西洛他唑、噻吩吡啶、阿司匹林[三联治疗])与双重抗血小板治疗减少冠状动脉支架植入术后再狭窄的随机对照试验进行荟萃分析。共纳入5项研究进行分析。分析显示,796例患者采用三联疗法,801例患者采用双联疗法。大约56%的患者接受药物洗脱支架。三联抗血小板治疗组6个月再狭窄率明显低于双联抗血小板治疗组(12.7% vs 21.9%;优势比0.5;95%置信区间为0.38-0.66;P < 0.001)。无论使用裸金属支架还是药物洗脱支架,这种益处都是可见的。5项研究中有3项报告了主要不良心脏事件和出血的发生率(n = 1426);对这些结果的分析显示,治疗组之间没有差异(P分别= 0.21和0.48)。在标准的双重抗血小板治疗中加入西洛他唑可减少血管造影再狭窄,并在6个月时增加MLD,而不显著影响主要不良心脏事件或出血的发生率。
{"title":"Addition of cilostazol to aspirin and a thienopyridine for prevention of restenosis after coronary artery stenting: a meta-analysis.","authors":"Douglas L Jennings, James S Kalus","doi":"10.1177/0091270009338940","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0091270009338940","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of adding cilostazol to dual antiplatelet therapy (aspirin and thienopyridine) on rates of restenosis after coronary artery stenting. A meta-analysis is conducted of randomized, controlled trials comparing 3 drug regimens (cilostazol, thienopyridine, aspirin [triple therapy]) with dual antiplatelet therapy to reduce restenosis after coronary stenting. A total of 5 studies are included for analysis. The analysis reveals that triple therapy is used in 796 patients, whereas dual therapy is used in 801 patients. Approximately 56% of patients receive a drug-eluting stent. The 6-month restenosis rates are significantly lower with triple versus dual antiplatelet therapy (12.7% vs 21.9%; odds ratio 0.5; 95% confidence interval, 0.38-0.66; P < .001). This benefit is seen regardless of whether a bare-metal or drug-eluting stent is used. Rates of major adverse cardiac events and bleeding are reported for 3 of the 5 studies (n = 1426); analysis of these outcomes shows no difference between treatment groups (P = .21 and .48, respectively). The addition of cilostazol to standard dual antiplatelet therapy reduces angiographic restenosis and increases MLD at 6 months without significantly affecting rates of major adverse cardiac events or bleeding.</p>","PeriodicalId":48908,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Pharmacology","volume":"50 4","pages":"415-21"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2010-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/0091270009338940","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"28652730","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2010-04-01Epub Date: 2010-01-15DOI: 10.1177/0091270009359182
Silvana Borges, Zeruesenay Desta, Yan Jin, Azzouz Faouzi, Jason D Robarge, Sanosh Philips, Santosh Philip, Anne Nguyen, Vered Stearns, Daniel Hayes, James M Rae, Todd C Skaar, David A Flockhart, Lang Li
Accurate assessment of CYP2D6 phenotypes from genotype is inadequate in patients taking CYP2D6 substrate together with CYP2D6 inhibitors. A novel CYP2D6 scoring system is proposed that incorporates the impact of concomitant medications with the genotype in calculating the CYP2D6 activity score. Training (n = 159) and validation (n = 81) data sets were obtained from a prospective cohort tamoxifen pharmacogenetics registry. Two inhibitor factors were defined: 1 genotype independent and 1 genotype based. Three CYP2D6 gene scoring systems, and their combination with the inhibitor factors, were compared. These 3 scores were based on Zineh, Zanger, and Gaedigk's approaches. Endoxifen/NDM-Tam plasma ratio was used as the phenotype. The overall performance of the 3 gene scoring systems without consideration of CYP2D6-inhibiting medications in predicting CYP2D6 phenotype was poor in both the training set (R(2) = 0.24, 0.22, and 0.18) and the validation set (R(2) = 0.30, 0.24, and 0.15). Once the CYP2D6 genotype-independent inhibitor factor was integrated into the score calculation, the R(2) values in the training and validation data sets were nearly twice as high as the genotype-only scoring model: (0.44, 0.43, 0.38) and (0.53, 0.50, 0.41), respectively. The integration of the inhibitory effect of concomitant medications with the CYP2D6 genotype into the composite CYP2D6 activity score doubled the ability to predict the CYP2D6 phenotype. However, endoxifen phenotypes still varied substantially, even with incorporation of CYD2D6 genotype and inhibiting factors, suggesting that other, as yet unidentified factors must be involved in tamoxifen activation.
{"title":"Composite functional genetic and comedication CYP2D6 activity score in predicting tamoxifen drug exposure among breast cancer patients.","authors":"Silvana Borges, Zeruesenay Desta, Yan Jin, Azzouz Faouzi, Jason D Robarge, Sanosh Philips, Santosh Philip, Anne Nguyen, Vered Stearns, Daniel Hayes, James M Rae, Todd C Skaar, David A Flockhart, Lang Li","doi":"10.1177/0091270009359182","DOIUrl":"10.1177/0091270009359182","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Accurate assessment of CYP2D6 phenotypes from genotype is inadequate in patients taking CYP2D6 substrate together with CYP2D6 inhibitors. A novel CYP2D6 scoring system is proposed that incorporates the impact of concomitant medications with the genotype in calculating the CYP2D6 activity score. Training (n = 159) and validation (n = 81) data sets were obtained from a prospective cohort tamoxifen pharmacogenetics registry. Two inhibitor factors were defined: 1 genotype independent and 1 genotype based. Three CYP2D6 gene scoring systems, and their combination with the inhibitor factors, were compared. These 3 scores were based on Zineh, Zanger, and Gaedigk's approaches. Endoxifen/NDM-Tam plasma ratio was used as the phenotype. The overall performance of the 3 gene scoring systems without consideration of CYP2D6-inhibiting medications in predicting CYP2D6 phenotype was poor in both the training set (R(2) = 0.24, 0.22, and 0.18) and the validation set (R(2) = 0.30, 0.24, and 0.15). Once the CYP2D6 genotype-independent inhibitor factor was integrated into the score calculation, the R(2) values in the training and validation data sets were nearly twice as high as the genotype-only scoring model: (0.44, 0.43, 0.38) and (0.53, 0.50, 0.41), respectively. The integration of the inhibitory effect of concomitant medications with the CYP2D6 genotype into the composite CYP2D6 activity score doubled the ability to predict the CYP2D6 phenotype. However, endoxifen phenotypes still varied substantially, even with incorporation of CYD2D6 genotype and inhibiting factors, suggesting that other, as yet unidentified factors must be involved in tamoxifen activation.</p>","PeriodicalId":48908,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Pharmacology","volume":"50 4","pages":"450-8"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2010-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3816977/pdf/nihms220544.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"28652703","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2010-04-01Epub Date: 2010-01-23DOI: 10.1177/0091270009344987
Adel H Karara, Timi Edeki, James McLeod, Alfred P Tonelli, John A Wagner
The FDA guidance on exploratory IND studies is intended to enable sponsors to move ahead more efficiently with the development of promising candidates. A survey of PhRMA member companies was conducted in 2007 to obtain a cross-sectional industry perspective on the current and future utility of exploratory IND studies. About 56% of survey responders (9 companies of 16 survey responders) conducted or were planning to conduct clinical studies under exploratory INDs. The majority of microdosing studies are performed to characterize human pharmacokinetics or to examine target organ pharmacokinetics using PET imaging techniques. On the other hand, the majority of pharmacological end point studies conducted under exploratory IND are performed to determine whether the compound modulated its pharmacological target or to evaluate the degree of saturation of a target receptor. The present survey suggests that although the merits of exploratory INDs are still being debated, the diversity in the applications cited, the potential for early clinical guidance in decision making and the increasing pressure on containing drug development costs, suggest that the exploratory IND/CTA will be a valuable option with evolving and possibly more specific applications for the future.
{"title":"PhRMA survey on the conduct of first-in-human clinical trials under exploratory investigational new drug applications.","authors":"Adel H Karara, Timi Edeki, James McLeod, Alfred P Tonelli, John A Wagner","doi":"10.1177/0091270009344987","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0091270009344987","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The FDA guidance on exploratory IND studies is intended to enable sponsors to move ahead more efficiently with the development of promising candidates. A survey of PhRMA member companies was conducted in 2007 to obtain a cross-sectional industry perspective on the current and future utility of exploratory IND studies. About 56% of survey responders (9 companies of 16 survey responders) conducted or were planning to conduct clinical studies under exploratory INDs. The majority of microdosing studies are performed to characterize human pharmacokinetics or to examine target organ pharmacokinetics using PET imaging techniques. On the other hand, the majority of pharmacological end point studies conducted under exploratory IND are performed to determine whether the compound modulated its pharmacological target or to evaluate the degree of saturation of a target receptor. The present survey suggests that although the merits of exploratory INDs are still being debated, the diversity in the applications cited, the potential for early clinical guidance in decision making and the increasing pressure on containing drug development costs, suggest that the exploratory IND/CTA will be a valuable option with evolving and possibly more specific applications for the future.</p>","PeriodicalId":48908,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Pharmacology","volume":"50 4","pages":"380-91"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2010-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/0091270009344987","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"28666412","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2010-02-01Epub Date: 2009-11-30DOI: 10.1177/0091270009336137
Ophelia Q P Yin, Neil Gallagher, Ai Li, Wei Zhou, Robert Harrell, Horst Schran
Nilotinib (Tasigna; Novartis Pharmaceuticals) is a second-generation BCR-ABL tyrosine kinase inhibitor newly approved for the treatment of imatinib-resistant or imatinib-intolerant Philadelphia chromosome positive (Ph+) chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase or accelerated phase. This study evaluated the effect of grapefruit juice on the pharmacokinetics of nilotinib in 21 healthy male participants. All participants underwent 2 study periods during which they received a single oral dose of 400 mg nilotinib with 240 mL double-strength grapefruit juice or 240 mL water in a crossover fashion. Serial blood samples were collected for the determination of serum nilotinib concentrations by a validated liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry assay. Concurrent intake of grapefruit juice increased the nilotinib peak concentration (C(max)) by 60% and the area under the serum concentration-time curve (AUC(0-infinity)) by 29% but did not affect the time to reach C(max) or the elimination half-life of nilotinib. The most common adverse events were headache and vomiting, which were mild or moderate in severity, and their frequency appeared to be similar between 2 treatments. Based on the currently available information about nilotinib and the observed extent of increase in nilotinib exposure, concurrent administration of nilotinib with grapefruit juice is not recommended.
{"title":"Effect of grapefruit juice on the pharmacokinetics of nilotinib in healthy participants.","authors":"Ophelia Q P Yin, Neil Gallagher, Ai Li, Wei Zhou, Robert Harrell, Horst Schran","doi":"10.1177/0091270009336137","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0091270009336137","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Nilotinib (Tasigna; Novartis Pharmaceuticals) is a second-generation BCR-ABL tyrosine kinase inhibitor newly approved for the treatment of imatinib-resistant or imatinib-intolerant Philadelphia chromosome positive (Ph+) chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase or accelerated phase. This study evaluated the effect of grapefruit juice on the pharmacokinetics of nilotinib in 21 healthy male participants. All participants underwent 2 study periods during which they received a single oral dose of 400 mg nilotinib with 240 mL double-strength grapefruit juice or 240 mL water in a crossover fashion. Serial blood samples were collected for the determination of serum nilotinib concentrations by a validated liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry assay. Concurrent intake of grapefruit juice increased the nilotinib peak concentration (C(max)) by 60% and the area under the serum concentration-time curve (AUC(0-infinity)) by 29% but did not affect the time to reach C(max) or the elimination half-life of nilotinib. The most common adverse events were headache and vomiting, which were mild or moderate in severity, and their frequency appeared to be similar between 2 treatments. Based on the currently available information about nilotinib and the observed extent of increase in nilotinib exposure, concurrent administration of nilotinib with grapefruit juice is not recommended.</p>","PeriodicalId":48908,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Pharmacology","volume":"50 2","pages":"188-94"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2010-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/0091270009336137","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"28537901","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2010-02-01Epub Date: 2009-11-25DOI: 10.1177/0091270009340418
Andrej Skerjanec, Jixian Wang, Kelly Maren, Lisa Rojkjaer
Deferasirox, a newly developed iron chelator, was coadministered orally with either a known inducer of drug metabolism or with cosubstrates for cytochrome P450 (CYP) to characterize the potential for drug-drug interactions. In the induction assessment, single-dose deferasirox pharmacokinetics were obtained in the presence and absence of a repeated-dose regimen of rifampin. In the CYP3A interaction evaluation, midazolam and its active hydroxylated metabolite were assessed after single doses of midazolam in the presence and absence of steady-state concentrations of deferasirox. To test for interaction at the level of CPY2C8, single-dose repaglinide pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics were determined with and without repeated-dose administration of deferasirox. After rifampin, a significant reduction (44%) in plasma exposure (AUC) to deferasirox was observed. Upon coadministration of midazolam, there was a modest reduction of up to 22% in midazolam exposure (AUC, C(max)), suggesting a modest induction of CYP3A4/5 by deferasirox. Def erasirox caused increases in repaglinide plasma C(max) and AUC of 1.5-fold to over 2-fold, respectively, with little change in blood glucose measures. Specific patient prescribing recommendations were established when coadministering deferasirox with midazolam, repaglinide, and rifampin. These recommendations may also apply to other substrates of CYP3A4/5 and CYP2C8 or potent inducers of glucuronidation.
{"title":"Investigation of the pharmacokinetic interactions of deferasirox, a once-daily oral iron chelator, with midazolam, rifampin, and repaglinide in healthy volunteers.","authors":"Andrej Skerjanec, Jixian Wang, Kelly Maren, Lisa Rojkjaer","doi":"10.1177/0091270009340418","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0091270009340418","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Deferasirox, a newly developed iron chelator, was coadministered orally with either a known inducer of drug metabolism or with cosubstrates for cytochrome P450 (CYP) to characterize the potential for drug-drug interactions. In the induction assessment, single-dose deferasirox pharmacokinetics were obtained in the presence and absence of a repeated-dose regimen of rifampin. In the CYP3A interaction evaluation, midazolam and its active hydroxylated metabolite were assessed after single doses of midazolam in the presence and absence of steady-state concentrations of deferasirox. To test for interaction at the level of CPY2C8, single-dose repaglinide pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics were determined with and without repeated-dose administration of deferasirox. After rifampin, a significant reduction (44%) in plasma exposure (AUC) to deferasirox was observed. Upon coadministration of midazolam, there was a modest reduction of up to 22% in midazolam exposure (AUC, C(max)), suggesting a modest induction of CYP3A4/5 by deferasirox. Def erasirox caused increases in repaglinide plasma C(max) and AUC of 1.5-fold to over 2-fold, respectively, with little change in blood glucose measures. Specific patient prescribing recommendations were established when coadministering deferasirox with midazolam, repaglinide, and rifampin. These recommendations may also apply to other substrates of CYP3A4/5 and CYP2C8 or potent inducers of glucuronidation.</p>","PeriodicalId":48908,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Pharmacology","volume":"50 2","pages":"205-13"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2010-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/0091270009340418","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"28529874","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}