首页 > 最新文献

Primary Care Respiratory Journal最新文献

英文 中文
Validation of the COPD Diagnostic Questionnaire in an Australian general practice cohort: a cross-sectional study. 在澳大利亚全科医生队列中验证慢性阻塞性肺病诊断问卷:一项横断面研究。
Pub Date : 2014-03-01 DOI: 10.4104/pcrj.2014.00015
Anthony J Stanley, Iqbal Hasan, Alan J Crockett, Onno C P van Schayck, Nicholas A Zwar

Background: The gold standard for the diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is spirometry, but there are barriers to its use in primary care.

Aims: To externally validate the COPD Diagnostic Questionnaire (CDQ) as a diagnostic tool in patients at increased risk in Australian general practice and to compare its performance with other CDQ validation studies.

Methods: Patients were recruited from 36 general practices in Sydney, Australia. Former or current smokers aged 40-85 years with no prior COPD diagnosis were invited to a case-finding appointment with the practice nurse. The CDQ was collected and pre- and postbronchodilator spirometry was performed. Cases for whom complete CDQ data were present and the spirometry met quality standards were analysed.

Results: Of 1,631 patients who attended case-finding recruitment, 1,054 (65%) could be analysed. Spirometry showed 13% had COPD. The ability of the CDQ to discriminate between patients with and without COPD was fair, represented by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.713. With a CDQ cut-off point value of 16.5 the sensitivity was 80% and specificity 47% and, at a cut-off point value of 19.5, the sensitivity was 63% and specificity 70%.

Conclusions: The CDQ did not discriminate between patients with and without COPD accurately enough to use as a diagnostic tool in patients at increased risk of COPD in Australian general practice. Further research is needed on the value of the CDQ as a tool for selecting patients for spirometry.

背景:目的:对慢性阻塞性肺疾病诊断问卷(CDQ)进行外部验证,将其作为诊断澳大利亚普通诊所高危患者的工具,并将其性能与其他 CDQ 验证研究进行比较:从澳大利亚悉尼的 36 家全科诊所招募患者。方法:从澳大利亚悉尼的 36 家全科诊所招募患者,邀请年龄在 40-85 岁之间、之前未确诊过慢性阻塞性肺病的曾经或现在吸烟者与诊所护士进行病例调查预约。收集 CDQ,并进行支气管扩张前后肺活量测定。对CDQ数据完整且肺活量测定符合质量标准的病例进行了分析:在 1631 名参加病例调查招募的患者中,有 1054 人(65%)可以进行分析。肺活量测定显示 13% 的患者患有慢性阻塞性肺病。CDQ 对慢性阻塞性肺病患者和非慢性阻塞性肺病患者的区分能力尚可,接收者工作特征曲线下的面积为 0.713。当 CDQ 临界点值为 16.5 时,灵敏度为 80%,特异度为 47%;当临界点值为 19.5 时,灵敏度为 63%,特异度为 70%:CDQ对慢性阻塞性肺病患者和非慢性阻塞性肺病患者的区分不够准确,不能作为诊断工具用于澳大利亚全科医生中慢性阻塞性肺病高危患者的诊断。还需要进一步研究 CDQ 作为选择患者进行肺活量测定的工具的价值。
{"title":"Validation of the COPD Diagnostic Questionnaire in an Australian general practice cohort: a cross-sectional study.","authors":"Anthony J Stanley, Iqbal Hasan, Alan J Crockett, Onno C P van Schayck, Nicholas A Zwar","doi":"10.4104/pcrj.2014.00015","DOIUrl":"10.4104/pcrj.2014.00015","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The gold standard for the diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is spirometry, but there are barriers to its use in primary care.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To externally validate the COPD Diagnostic Questionnaire (CDQ) as a diagnostic tool in patients at increased risk in Australian general practice and to compare its performance with other CDQ validation studies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients were recruited from 36 general practices in Sydney, Australia. Former or current smokers aged 40-85 years with no prior COPD diagnosis were invited to a case-finding appointment with the practice nurse. The CDQ was collected and pre- and postbronchodilator spirometry was performed. Cases for whom complete CDQ data were present and the spirometry met quality standards were analysed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 1,631 patients who attended case-finding recruitment, 1,054 (65%) could be analysed. Spirometry showed 13% had COPD. The ability of the CDQ to discriminate between patients with and without COPD was fair, represented by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.713. With a CDQ cut-off point value of 16.5 the sensitivity was 80% and specificity 47% and, at a cut-off point value of 19.5, the sensitivity was 63% and specificity 70%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The CDQ did not discriminate between patients with and without COPD accurately enough to use as a diagnostic tool in patients at increased risk of COPD in Australian general practice. Further research is needed on the value of the CDQ as a tool for selecting patients for spirometry.</p>","PeriodicalId":48998,"journal":{"name":"Primary Care Respiratory Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2014-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6442288/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"32155509","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A golden goal in 2010, and another GOLD in 2014 in primary care, or vice versa. 2010年是一个黄金目标,2014年又是一个初级保健黄金目标,反之亦然。
Pub Date : 2014-03-01 DOI: 10.4104/pcrj.2014.00018
Joan B Soriano, Miguel Román Rodríguez
References 1. Steppuhn H, Langen U, Keil T, Scheidt-Nave C. Chronic disease co-morbidity of asthma and unscheduled asthma care among adults: results of the national telephone health interview survey German Health Update (GEDA) 2009 and 2010. Prim Care Respir J 2014;23(1):22-29. http://dx.doi.org/10.4104/pcrj.2013.00107 2. Commission on Social Determinants of Health, Closing the gap in a generation. Health equity through action on the social determinants of health. 2008, World Health Organisation: Geneva. 3. van den Akker M, Buntinx F, Knottnerus JA. Comorbidity or multimorbidity: what's in a name? A review of literature. Eur J Gen Pract 1996;2:65-70. http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/13814789609162146 4. Barnett, K., S. Mercer, et al. Epidemiology of multimorbidity and implications for health care, research, and medical edication: a cross-sectional study. Lancet 2012;380(9836):37-43. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60240-2 5. Guthrie B, Payne K, Alderson P, McMurdo MET, Mercer SW. Adapting clinical guidelines to take account of multimorbidity. BMJ 2012;345:e6341. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.e6341 6. Payne RA, Abel GA, Avery AJ, Mercer SW, Roland MO. Is polypharmacy always hazardous? A retrospective cohort analysis using linked electronic health records from primary and secondary care. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2014, Jan 15 [Epub ahead of print] http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bcp.12292 7. Vik SA, Maxwell CJ, Hogan DB. Measurement, correlates, and health outcomes of medication adherence among seniors. Ann Pharmacother 2004;38:303-12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1345/aph.1D252 8. May C, Montori VM, Mair FS. We need minimally disruptive medicine. BMJ 2009; 339:b2803. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b2803 9. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Depression in adults with a chronic physical health problem: treatment and management (National Clinical Practice Guideline Number 91 ). 10. Mercer SW, Guthrie B, Furler J, Watt GCM, Hart JT. Multimorbidity and the inverse care law in primary care. BMJ 2012;344:e4152. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.e4152 11. Smith SM, Soubhi H, Fortin M, Hudon C, O’Dowd T. Interventions for improving outcomes in patients with multimorbidity in primary care and community settings: systematic review. BMJ 2012;345:e5205. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.e5205
{"title":"A golden goal in 2010, and another GOLD in 2014 in primary care, or vice versa.","authors":"Joan B Soriano,&nbsp;Miguel Román Rodríguez","doi":"10.4104/pcrj.2014.00018","DOIUrl":"10.4104/pcrj.2014.00018","url":null,"abstract":"References 1. Steppuhn H, Langen U, Keil T, Scheidt-Nave C. Chronic disease co-morbidity of asthma and unscheduled asthma care among adults: results of the national telephone health interview survey German Health Update (GEDA) 2009 and 2010. Prim Care Respir J 2014;23(1):22-29. http://dx.doi.org/10.4104/pcrj.2013.00107 2. Commission on Social Determinants of Health, Closing the gap in a generation. Health equity through action on the social determinants of health. 2008, World Health Organisation: Geneva. 3. van den Akker M, Buntinx F, Knottnerus JA. Comorbidity or multimorbidity: what's in a name? A review of literature. Eur J Gen Pract 1996;2:65-70. http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/13814789609162146 4. Barnett, K., S. Mercer, et al. Epidemiology of multimorbidity and implications for health care, research, and medical edication: a cross-sectional study. Lancet 2012;380(9836):37-43. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60240-2 5. Guthrie B, Payne K, Alderson P, McMurdo MET, Mercer SW. Adapting clinical guidelines to take account of multimorbidity. BMJ 2012;345:e6341. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.e6341 6. Payne RA, Abel GA, Avery AJ, Mercer SW, Roland MO. Is polypharmacy always hazardous? A retrospective cohort analysis using linked electronic health records from primary and secondary care. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2014, Jan 15 [Epub ahead of print] http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bcp.12292 7. Vik SA, Maxwell CJ, Hogan DB. Measurement, correlates, and health outcomes of medication adherence among seniors. Ann Pharmacother 2004;38:303-12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1345/aph.1D252 8. May C, Montori VM, Mair FS. We need minimally disruptive medicine. BMJ 2009; 339:b2803. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b2803 9. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Depression in adults with a chronic physical health problem: treatment and management (National Clinical Practice Guideline Number 91 ). 10. Mercer SW, Guthrie B, Furler J, Watt GCM, Hart JT. Multimorbidity and the inverse care law in primary care. BMJ 2012;344:e4152. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.e4152 11. Smith SM, Soubhi H, Fortin M, Hudon C, O’Dowd T. Interventions for improving outcomes in patients with multimorbidity in primary care and community settings: systematic review. BMJ 2012;345:e5205. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.e5205","PeriodicalId":48998,"journal":{"name":"Primary Care Respiratory Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2014-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4104/pcrj.2014.00018","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"40299044","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Chronic disease co-morbidity of asthma and unscheduled asthma care among adults: results of the national telephone health interview survey German Health Update (GEDA) 2009 and 2010. 成人哮喘慢性病合并症和计划外哮喘治疗:2009年和2010年德国健康更新(GEDA)全国电话健康访谈调查的结果。
Pub Date : 2014-03-01 DOI: 10.4104/pcrj.2013.00107
Henriette Steppuhn, Ute Langen, Thomas Keil, Christa Scheidt-Nave

Background: Co-morbidities may complicate the clinical management of chronic conditions such as asthma.

Aims: To quantify the strength of the relationship between asthma and other chronic diseases and to analyse whether co-morbidities contribute to unscheduled asthma care.

Methods: Data from two consecutive national telephone health interview surveys (GEDA 2009 and 2010) including a total of 43,312 adults (>18 years of age) were analysed. Persons with and without a current diagnosis of asthma were compared with respect to concurrent diagnoses (diabetes mellitus, hypertension, chronic heart failure, depression, osteoarthritis, stroke, coronary heart disease, and cancer). Logistic regression models were applied to assess the strength of the association between asthma and co-morbidities in the total study population and, among persons with asthma, between the number of co-morbidities and unscheduled inpatient (hospital admissions and/or emergency department admissions) or outpatient asthma care in the past 12 months.

Results: Overall, 5.3% (95% CI 5.0% to 5.6%) of adults reported current physician-diagnosed asthma. Asthma was significantly associated with most of the conditions considered and 18% of persons with asthma had three or more co-morbidities. Adjusted odds ratios (AOR) of unscheduled asthma care increased with numbers of conditions, with AOR 3.40 (95% CI 1.39 to 8.31) for unscheduled inpatient care and AOR 2.32 (95% CI 1.30 to 4.14) for unscheduled outpatient care comparing those with three or more co-morbidities versus those with none.

Conclusions: The magnitude of chronic disease co-morbidity is substantial in asthma, is related to unscheduled asthma care, and implies a significant number of adults with asthma facing complex healthcare needs.

背景:合并症可能使慢性疾病如哮喘的临床管理复杂化。目的:量化哮喘与其他慢性疾病之间的关系强度,并分析合并症是否有助于计划外哮喘护理。方法:分析两次连续的全国电话健康访谈调查(2009年和2010年)的数据,其中包括43,312名成年人(>18岁)。目前诊断为哮喘和未诊断为哮喘的人在并发诊断(糖尿病、高血压、慢性心力衰竭、抑郁症、骨关节炎、中风、冠心病和癌症)方面进行比较。应用Logistic回归模型评估总体研究人群中哮喘与合并症之间的关联强度,以及哮喘患者中合并症数量与过去12个月内未计划住院(住院和/或急诊住院)或门诊哮喘护理之间的关联强度。结果:总体而言,5.3% (95% CI 5.0%至5.6%)的成年人报告目前有医生诊断的哮喘。哮喘与所考虑的大多数疾病显著相关,18%的哮喘患者有三种或更多的合并症。非计划哮喘治疗的调整优势比(AOR)随着疾病数量的增加而增加,非计划住院治疗的调整优势比为3.40 (95% CI 1.39 ~ 8.31),非计划门诊治疗的调整优势比为2.32 (95% CI 1.30 ~ 4.14),与有三种或更多合并症的患者相比,无计划门诊治疗的调整优势比为2.32 (95% CI 1.30 ~ 4.14)。结论:哮喘慢性疾病合并症的严重程度是相当可观的,与计划外的哮喘护理有关,这意味着有相当数量的成人哮喘患者面临复杂的医疗保健需求。
{"title":"Chronic disease co-morbidity of asthma and unscheduled asthma care among adults: results of the national telephone health interview survey German Health Update (GEDA) 2009 and 2010.","authors":"Henriette Steppuhn,&nbsp;Ute Langen,&nbsp;Thomas Keil,&nbsp;Christa Scheidt-Nave","doi":"10.4104/pcrj.2013.00107","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4104/pcrj.2013.00107","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Co-morbidities may complicate the clinical management of chronic conditions such as asthma.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To quantify the strength of the relationship between asthma and other chronic diseases and to analyse whether co-morbidities contribute to unscheduled asthma care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from two consecutive national telephone health interview surveys (GEDA 2009 and 2010) including a total of 43,312 adults (>18 years of age) were analysed. Persons with and without a current diagnosis of asthma were compared with respect to concurrent diagnoses (diabetes mellitus, hypertension, chronic heart failure, depression, osteoarthritis, stroke, coronary heart disease, and cancer). Logistic regression models were applied to assess the strength of the association between asthma and co-morbidities in the total study population and, among persons with asthma, between the number of co-morbidities and unscheduled inpatient (hospital admissions and/or emergency department admissions) or outpatient asthma care in the past 12 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 5.3% (95% CI 5.0% to 5.6%) of adults reported current physician-diagnosed asthma. Asthma was significantly associated with most of the conditions considered and 18% of persons with asthma had three or more co-morbidities. Adjusted odds ratios (AOR) of unscheduled asthma care increased with numbers of conditions, with AOR 3.40 (95% CI 1.39 to 8.31) for unscheduled inpatient care and AOR 2.32 (95% CI 1.30 to 4.14) for unscheduled outpatient care comparing those with three or more co-morbidities versus those with none.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The magnitude of chronic disease co-morbidity is substantial in asthma, is related to unscheduled asthma care, and implies a significant number of adults with asthma facing complex healthcare needs.</p>","PeriodicalId":48998,"journal":{"name":"Primary Care Respiratory Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2014-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4104/pcrj.2013.00107","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"31962367","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 42
Indolent pneumonia in a pregnant recent immigrant from Ethiopia: think TB. 来自埃塞俄比亚的一名刚怀孕的移民患上了传染性肺炎:想想肺结核吧。
Pub Date : 2014-03-01 DOI: 10.4104/pcrj.2014.00001
Hashem Bishara, Moshe Lidji, Olga Vinitsky, Daniel Weiler-Ravell

Time delay to tuberculosis (TB) diagnosis remains a public health concern. In pregnancy, early TB diagnosis is challenging and acquires further significance due to the risk of infection of the newborn as well as others in the maternity setting. We report a delay of 12 weeks in the diagnosis of TB in a pregnant recent immigrant from Ethiopia to Israel. Contact investigation revealed pulmonary TB in her two daughters aged four and seven years. We discuss the reasons for this delay in diagnosis, how a more timely diagnosis might have been made, and the dilemma of initiating treatment in unconfirmed TB.

结核病诊断的时间延迟仍然是一个公共卫生问题。在怀孕期间,早期结核病诊断具有挑战性,并且由于新生儿和其他产妇感染的风险,其意义进一步扩大。我们报告了一名从埃塞俄比亚到以色列的怀孕移民的结核病诊断延迟了12周。接触者调查显示,她的两个女儿分别为4岁和7岁,患有肺结核。我们讨论了诊断延迟的原因,如何做出更及时的诊断,以及在未经证实的结核病中开始治疗的困境。
{"title":"Indolent pneumonia in a pregnant recent immigrant from Ethiopia: think TB.","authors":"Hashem Bishara, Moshe Lidji, Olga Vinitsky, Daniel Weiler-Ravell","doi":"10.4104/pcrj.2014.00001","DOIUrl":"10.4104/pcrj.2014.00001","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Time delay to tuberculosis (TB) diagnosis remains a public health concern. In pregnancy, early TB diagnosis is challenging and acquires further significance due to the risk of infection of the newborn as well as others in the maternity setting. We report a delay of 12 weeks in the diagnosis of TB in a pregnant recent immigrant from Ethiopia to Israel. Contact investigation revealed pulmonary TB in her two daughters aged four and seven years. We discuss the reasons for this delay in diagnosis, how a more timely diagnosis might have been made, and the dilemma of initiating treatment in unconfirmed TB. </p>","PeriodicalId":48998,"journal":{"name":"Primary Care Respiratory Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2014-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6442269/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"32063488","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
National cohort data from Sweden to the National COPD audit in England and Wales: grand designs for quality improvement. 从瑞典到英格兰和威尔士全国COPD审计的国家队列数据:质量改进的大设计。
Pub Date : 2014-03-01 DOI: 10.4104/pcrj.2014.00013
Rupert Jones, Michael Roberts
National cohort data from Sweden to the National COPD audit in England and Wales: grand designs for quality improvement
{"title":"National cohort data from Sweden to the National COPD audit in England and Wales: grand designs for quality improvement.","authors":"Rupert Jones,&nbsp;Michael Roberts","doi":"10.4104/pcrj.2014.00013","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4104/pcrj.2014.00013","url":null,"abstract":"National cohort data from Sweden to the National COPD audit in England and Wales: grand designs for quality improvement","PeriodicalId":48998,"journal":{"name":"Primary Care Respiratory Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2014-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4104/pcrj.2014.00013","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"32140003","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
Inappropriate prescribing of combination inhalers in Northern Ireland: retrospective cross-sectional cohort study of prescribing practice in primary care. 北爱尔兰联合吸入器处方不当:初级保健处方实践的回顾性横断面队列研究。
Pub Date : 2014-03-01 DOI: 10.4104/pcrj.2014.00007
Joan Sweeney, Chris C Patterson, Stephen O'Neill, Ciaran O'Neill, Gillian Plant, Veranne Lynch, Teresa McAllister, Liam G Heaney

Background: Asthma management guidelines advocate a stepwise approach to asthma therapy, including the addition of a long-acting bronchodilator to inhaled steroid therapy at step 3. This is almost exclusively prescribed as inhaled combination therapy.

Aims: To examine whether asthma prescribing practice for inhaled combination therapy (inhaled corticosteroid/long-acting β2-agonist (ICS/LABA)) in primary care in Northern Ireland is in line with national asthma management guidelines.

Methods: Using data from the Northern Ireland Enhanced Prescribing Database, we examined initiation of ICS/LABA in subjects aged 5-35 years in 2010.

Results: A total of 2,640 subjects (67%) had no inhaled corticosteroid monotherapy (ICS) in the study year or six months of the preceding year (lead-in period) and, extending this to a 12-month lead-in period, 52% had no prior ICS. 41% of first prescriptions for ICS/LABA were dispensed in January to March. Prior to ICS/LABA prescription, in the previous six months only 17% had a short-acting β2-agonist (SABA) dispensed, 5% received oral steroids, and 17% received an antibiotic.

Conclusions: ICS/LABA therapy was initiated in the majority of young subjects with asthma without prior inhaled steroid therapy. Most prescriptions were initiated in the January to March period. However, the prescribing of ICS/LABA did not appear to be driven by asthma symptoms (17% received SABA in the previous 6 months) or severe asthma exacerbation (only 5% received oral steroids). Significant reductions in ICS/LABA, with associated cost savings, would occur if the asthma prescribing guidelines were followed in primary care.

背景:哮喘管理指南提倡循序渐进的哮喘治疗方法,包括在第3步吸入类固醇治疗的基础上加入长效支气管扩张剂。这几乎完全被规定为吸入联合治疗。目的:研究北爱尔兰初级保健中吸入联合治疗(吸入皮质类固醇/长效β2激动剂(ICS/LABA))的哮喘处方实践是否符合国家哮喘管理指南。方法:使用北爱尔兰增强处方数据库的数据,我们调查了2010年5-35岁受试者开始使用ICS/LABA的情况。结果:共有2640名受试者(67%)在研究年度或前一年的6个月(先导期)未接受吸入性皮质类固醇单药治疗(ICS),将其延长至12个月的先导期,52%的受试者先前没有ICS。ICS/LABA的首批处方中有41%是在1月至3月发放的。在ICS/LABA处方之前,在过去的六个月中,只有17%的患者使用了短效β2激动剂(SABA), 5%的患者使用了口服类固醇,17%的患者使用了抗生素。结论:ICS/LABA治疗开始于大多数没有吸入类固醇治疗的年轻哮喘患者。大多数处方是在1月至3月期间开始的。然而,ICS/LABA的处方似乎不是由哮喘症状(17%的患者在过去6个月内接受了SABA治疗)或严重哮喘恶化(仅5%的患者接受了口服类固醇治疗)驱动的。如果在初级保健中遵循哮喘处方指南,ICS/LABA的显著减少和相关的成本节约将会发生。
{"title":"Inappropriate prescribing of combination inhalers in Northern Ireland: retrospective cross-sectional cohort study of prescribing practice in primary care.","authors":"Joan Sweeney,&nbsp;Chris C Patterson,&nbsp;Stephen O'Neill,&nbsp;Ciaran O'Neill,&nbsp;Gillian Plant,&nbsp;Veranne Lynch,&nbsp;Teresa McAllister,&nbsp;Liam G Heaney","doi":"10.4104/pcrj.2014.00007","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4104/pcrj.2014.00007","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Asthma management guidelines advocate a stepwise approach to asthma therapy, including the addition of a long-acting bronchodilator to inhaled steroid therapy at step 3. This is almost exclusively prescribed as inhaled combination therapy.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To examine whether asthma prescribing practice for inhaled combination therapy (inhaled corticosteroid/long-acting β2-agonist (ICS/LABA)) in primary care in Northern Ireland is in line with national asthma management guidelines.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using data from the Northern Ireland Enhanced Prescribing Database, we examined initiation of ICS/LABA in subjects aged 5-35 years in 2010.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 2,640 subjects (67%) had no inhaled corticosteroid monotherapy (ICS) in the study year or six months of the preceding year (lead-in period) and, extending this to a 12-month lead-in period, 52% had no prior ICS. 41% of first prescriptions for ICS/LABA were dispensed in January to March. Prior to ICS/LABA prescription, in the previous six months only 17% had a short-acting β2-agonist (SABA) dispensed, 5% received oral steroids, and 17% received an antibiotic.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ICS/LABA therapy was initiated in the majority of young subjects with asthma without prior inhaled steroid therapy. Most prescriptions were initiated in the January to March period. However, the prescribing of ICS/LABA did not appear to be driven by asthma symptoms (17% received SABA in the previous 6 months) or severe asthma exacerbation (only 5% received oral steroids). Significant reductions in ICS/LABA, with associated cost savings, would occur if the asthma prescribing guidelines were followed in primary care.</p>","PeriodicalId":48998,"journal":{"name":"Primary Care Respiratory Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2014-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4104/pcrj.2014.00007","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"32155507","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10
Transgenerational occurrence of allergic disease and autoimmunity: general practice-based epidemiological research. 变态反应性疾病和自身免疫的跨代发生:基于一般实践的流行病学研究。
Pub Date : 2014-03-01 DOI: 10.4104/pcrj.2013.00108
Tanja Maas, Chris Nieuwhof, Valeria Lima Passos, Caroline Robertson, Annelies Boonen, Robert B Landewé, J Willem Voncken, J André Knottnerus, Jan G Damoiseaux

Background: Corresponding with the T helper cell type 1/T helper cell type 2 hypothesis, autoimmune and allergic diseases are considered pathologically distinct and mutually exclusive conditions. Co-occurrence of autoimmune disorders and allergy within patients, however, has been reported. Transgenerational co-occurrence of autoimmune and allergic disease has been less often described and may differ from the intra-patient results.

Aims: To test the hypothesis that autoimmune disorders in parents are a risk factor for the development of an allergic disease in their offspring.

Methods: Prospectively registered (by academic general practitioners) International Classifications of Primary Care (ICPC) for diagnoses of autoimmune disorders and allergy within families were evaluated (n=5,604 families) by performing multiple logistic regression analyses.

Results: The presence of any ICPC-encoded autoimmune disorder in fathers appeared to be associated with an increased risk in their eldest children of developing an allergy (odds ratio (OR) 1.4, 95% CI 1.042 to 1.794). Psoriasis in fathers was particularly shown to be of influence (OR 1.5, 95% CI 1.061 to 2.117) and, although any ICPC-encoded autoimmune disease in mothers was found not to be of significance, the combined international code for registering rheumatoid arthritis/ankylosing spondylitis in mothers was OR 1.7 (95% CI 1.031 to 2.852).

Conclusions: The occurrence of ICPC-encoded autoimmune disorders in parents, especially psoriasis and rheumatoid arthritis/ankylosing spondylitis, significantly increases the occurrence of allergic disease in their children. After validation in follow-up research in a larger sample, these results may lead to the inclusion of 'parental autoimmune condition' as a risk factor in the general practitioner's diagnostics of allergic disease.

背景:与辅助性T细胞1型/辅助性T细胞2型假说相对应,自身免疫性和过敏性疾病被认为是病理上不同且相互排斥的疾病。然而,有报道称患者自身免疫性疾病和过敏同时发生。自身免疫性疾病和过敏性疾病的跨代共发很少被描述,可能与患者内部结果不同。目的:验证父母自身免疫性疾病是其后代发生过敏性疾病的危险因素的假设。方法:通过多元逻辑回归分析,对(由学术全科医生)国际初级保健分类(ICPC)中诊断自身免疫性疾病和过敏的家庭(n= 5604个家庭)进行前瞻性登记。结果:父亲中任何icpc编码的自身免疫性疾病的存在似乎与他们最大的孩子发生过敏的风险增加有关(优势比(OR) 1.4, 95% CI 1.042至1.794)。父亲的银屑病尤其受到影响(OR为1.5,95% CI为1.061至2.117),尽管发现母亲中任何icpc编码的自身免疫性疾病没有显著性,但登记母亲类风湿关节炎/强直性脊柱炎的综合国际代码为OR为1.7 (95% CI为1.031至2.852)。结论:父母发生icpc编码的自身免疫性疾病,特别是牛皮癣和类风湿关节炎/强直性脊柱炎,显著增加其子女变应性疾病的发生。在更大样本的后续研究验证后,这些结果可能导致将“父母自身免疫状况”作为全科医生诊断过敏性疾病的风险因素。
{"title":"Transgenerational occurrence of allergic disease and autoimmunity: general practice-based epidemiological research.","authors":"Tanja Maas,&nbsp;Chris Nieuwhof,&nbsp;Valeria Lima Passos,&nbsp;Caroline Robertson,&nbsp;Annelies Boonen,&nbsp;Robert B Landewé,&nbsp;J Willem Voncken,&nbsp;J André Knottnerus,&nbsp;Jan G Damoiseaux","doi":"10.4104/pcrj.2013.00108","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4104/pcrj.2013.00108","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Corresponding with the T helper cell type 1/T helper cell type 2 hypothesis, autoimmune and allergic diseases are considered pathologically distinct and mutually exclusive conditions. Co-occurrence of autoimmune disorders and allergy within patients, however, has been reported. Transgenerational co-occurrence of autoimmune and allergic disease has been less often described and may differ from the intra-patient results.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To test the hypothesis that autoimmune disorders in parents are a risk factor for the development of an allergic disease in their offspring.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Prospectively registered (by academic general practitioners) International Classifications of Primary Care (ICPC) for diagnoses of autoimmune disorders and allergy within families were evaluated (n=5,604 families) by performing multiple logistic regression analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The presence of any ICPC-encoded autoimmune disorder in fathers appeared to be associated with an increased risk in their eldest children of developing an allergy (odds ratio (OR) 1.4, 95% CI 1.042 to 1.794). Psoriasis in fathers was particularly shown to be of influence (OR 1.5, 95% CI 1.061 to 2.117) and, although any ICPC-encoded autoimmune disease in mothers was found not to be of significance, the combined international code for registering rheumatoid arthritis/ankylosing spondylitis in mothers was OR 1.7 (95% CI 1.031 to 2.852).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The occurrence of ICPC-encoded autoimmune disorders in parents, especially psoriasis and rheumatoid arthritis/ankylosing spondylitis, significantly increases the occurrence of allergic disease in their children. After validation in follow-up research in a larger sample, these results may lead to the inclusion of 'parental autoimmune condition' as a risk factor in the general practitioner's diagnostics of allergic disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":48998,"journal":{"name":"Primary Care Respiratory Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2014-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4104/pcrj.2013.00108","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"32049104","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 21
Predicting the outcome of early childhood wheeze: mission impossible. 预测儿童早期喘息的结果:不可能的任务。
Pub Date : 2014-03-01 DOI: 10.4104/pcrj.2014.00010
Paul L P Brand
References 1. Quill TE, Abernethy AP. Generalist plus specialist palliative care--creating a more sustainable model. N Engl J Med 2013;368(13):1173-5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMp1215620 2. Luddington L, Cox S, Higginson I, Livesley B. The need for palliative care for patients with non-cancer diseases: a review of the evidence. Int J Palliat Nurs 2001;7(5):221-6. 3. Currow DC, Ward A, Clark K, Burns CM, Abernethy AP. Caregivers for people with end-stage lung disease: characteristics and unmet needs in the whole population. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis 2008;3(4):753-62. 4. Girgis A, Abernethy AP, Currow DC. Caring at the end of life: do cancer caregivers differ from other caregivers? BMJ Support Palliat Care 2014;Published Online First 22 January 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjspcare-2013-000495 5. Curtis JR. Palliative and end-of-life care for patients with severe COPD. Eur Respir J 2008;32(3):796-803. http://dx.doi.org/10.1183/09031936.00126107 6. Currow DC, Abernethy AP, Fazekas BS. Specialist palliative care needs of whole populations: a feasibility study using a novel approach. Palliat Med 2004;18(3):23947. http://dx.doi.org/10.1191/0269216304pm873oa 7. Epiphaniou C, Shipman C, Harding R, Mason B, Murray SAA, Higginson IJ, Daveson BA. Coordination of end-of-life care for patients with lung cancer and those with advanced COPD: are there transferable lessons? A longitudinal qualitative study. Prim Care Respir J 2014;23(1):46-51. http://dx.doi.org/10.4104/pcrj.2014.00004 8. Currow DC, Plummer JL, Crockett A, Abernethy AP. A community population survey of prevalence and severity of dyspnea in adults. J Pain Symptom Manage 2009;38(4):533-45. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2009.01.006 9. Wagner EH, Ludman EJ, Aiello Bowles EJ, et al. Nurse navigators in early cancer care: a randomized, controlled trial. J Clin Oncol 2014;32(1):12-18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2013.51.7359 10. Pinnock H, Hanley J, McCloughan L, et al. Effectiveness of telemonitoring integrated into existing clinical services on hospital admission for exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: researcher blind, multicentre, randomised controlled trial. BMJ 2013;347:f6070. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.f6070 11. Abernethy AP, Currow DC, Hunt R, et al. A pragmatic 2 x 2 x 2 factorial cluster randomized controlled trial of educational outreach visiting and case conferencing in palliative care-methodology of the Palliative Care Trial [ISRCTN 81117481]. Contemp Clin Trials 2006;27(1):83-100. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cct.2005.09.006 12. Abernethy AP, Currow DC, Shelby-James T, et al. Delivery strategies to optimize resource utilization and performance status for patients with advanced life-limiting illness: results from the "palliative care trial" [ISRCTN 81117481]. J Pain Symptom Manage 2013;45(3):488-505. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2012.02.024 13. Rich MW, Beckham V, Wittenberg C, Leven CL, Freedland KE, Carney RM. A multidisciplinary in
{"title":"Predicting the outcome of early childhood wheeze: mission impossible.","authors":"Paul L P Brand","doi":"10.4104/pcrj.2014.00010","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4104/pcrj.2014.00010","url":null,"abstract":"References 1. Quill TE, Abernethy AP. Generalist plus specialist palliative care--creating a more sustainable model. N Engl J Med 2013;368(13):1173-5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMp1215620 2. Luddington L, Cox S, Higginson I, Livesley B. The need for palliative care for patients with non-cancer diseases: a review of the evidence. Int J Palliat Nurs 2001;7(5):221-6. 3. Currow DC, Ward A, Clark K, Burns CM, Abernethy AP. Caregivers for people with end-stage lung disease: characteristics and unmet needs in the whole population. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis 2008;3(4):753-62. 4. Girgis A, Abernethy AP, Currow DC. Caring at the end of life: do cancer caregivers differ from other caregivers? BMJ Support Palliat Care 2014;Published Online First 22 January 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjspcare-2013-000495 5. Curtis JR. Palliative and end-of-life care for patients with severe COPD. Eur Respir J 2008;32(3):796-803. http://dx.doi.org/10.1183/09031936.00126107 6. Currow DC, Abernethy AP, Fazekas BS. Specialist palliative care needs of whole populations: a feasibility study using a novel approach. Palliat Med 2004;18(3):23947. http://dx.doi.org/10.1191/0269216304pm873oa 7. Epiphaniou C, Shipman C, Harding R, Mason B, Murray SAA, Higginson IJ, Daveson BA. Coordination of end-of-life care for patients with lung cancer and those with advanced COPD: are there transferable lessons? A longitudinal qualitative study. Prim Care Respir J 2014;23(1):46-51. http://dx.doi.org/10.4104/pcrj.2014.00004 8. Currow DC, Plummer JL, Crockett A, Abernethy AP. A community population survey of prevalence and severity of dyspnea in adults. J Pain Symptom Manage 2009;38(4):533-45. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2009.01.006 9. Wagner EH, Ludman EJ, Aiello Bowles EJ, et al. Nurse navigators in early cancer care: a randomized, controlled trial. J Clin Oncol 2014;32(1):12-18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2013.51.7359 10. Pinnock H, Hanley J, McCloughan L, et al. Effectiveness of telemonitoring integrated into existing clinical services on hospital admission for exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: researcher blind, multicentre, randomised controlled trial. BMJ 2013;347:f6070. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.f6070 11. Abernethy AP, Currow DC, Hunt R, et al. A pragmatic 2 x 2 x 2 factorial cluster randomized controlled trial of educational outreach visiting and case conferencing in palliative care-methodology of the Palliative Care Trial [ISRCTN 81117481]. Contemp Clin Trials 2006;27(1):83-100. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cct.2005.09.006 12. Abernethy AP, Currow DC, Shelby-James T, et al. Delivery strategies to optimize resource utilization and performance status for patients with advanced life-limiting illness: results from the \"palliative care trial\" [ISRCTN 81117481]. J Pain Symptom Manage 2013;45(3):488-505. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2012.02.024 13. Rich MW, Beckham V, Wittenberg C, Leven CL, Freedland KE, Carney RM. A multidisciplinary in","PeriodicalId":48998,"journal":{"name":"Primary Care Respiratory Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2014-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4104/pcrj.2014.00010","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"32140057","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Impact of switching to new spirometric reference equations on severity staging of airflow obstruction in COPD: a crosssectional observational study in primary care. 切换到新的肺活量计参考方程对COPD患者气流阻塞严重程度分期的影响:一项初级保健的横断面观察研究。
Pub Date : 2014-03-01 DOI: 10.4104/pcrj.2014.00006
Romina Sluga, Ivo J M Smeele, Annelies E Lucas, Bart P Thoonen, Joke G Grootens-Stekelenburg, Yvonne F Heijdra, Tjard R Schermer

Background: Severity of airflow obstruction in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is based on forced expiratory volume in one second expressed as percentage predicted (FEV1%predicted) derived from reference equations for spirometry results.

Aims: To establish how switching to new spirometric reference equations would affect severity staging of airflow obstruction in the Dutch primary care COPD patient population.

Methods: Spirometry tests of 3,370 adults aged >40 years with obstruction (postbronchodilator FEV1/forced vital capacity (FVC) <0.70) were analysed. The presence and severity of obstruction were defined using Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) criteria. Postbronchodilator FEV1%predicted was calculated using three reference equations: corrected European Community of Steel and Coal (ECSC) (currently recommended in Dutch primary care), Swanney et al., and Global Lung Initiative (GLI). Discordances between severity classifications based on these equations were analysed.

Results: We studied 1,297 (38.5%) females and 2,073 males. Application of contemporary reference equations (i.e. Swanney and GLI) changed the GOLD severity stages obtained with the ECSC equations, mostly into milder stages. Severity of airflow obstruction was staged differently in 14.0% and 6.3%, respectively, when the Swanney et al. and GLI reference equations were applied.

Conclusions: Compared with the (corrected) ECSC equations, switching to more contemporary reference equations would result in lower FEV1 predicted values and affect interpretation of spirometry by reclassifying 6-14% of primary care COPD patients into different (mostly milder) severity stages. If and how this will affect GPs' treatment choices in individual patients with COPD requires further investigation.

背景:慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者气流阻塞的严重程度是基于肺活量测定结果参考方程中以预测百分比(fev1%预测)表示的一秒钟用力呼气量。目的:确定转换到新的肺量计参考方程将如何影响荷兰初级保健COPD患者气流阻塞的严重程度分期。方法:对3370例年龄>40岁梗阻患者(支气管扩张剂后FEV1/用力肺活量(FVC))进行肺活量测定。结果:1297例女性(38.5%),2073例男性。当代参考方程(即Swanney和GLI)的应用改变了ECSC方程得到的GOLD严重程度,主要是较轻的阶段。当使用Swanney等人的参考方程和GLI参考方程时,气流阻塞严重程度的分级分别为14.0%和6.3%。结论:与(修正的)ECSC方程相比,切换到更现代的参考方程将导致FEV1预测值更低,并通过将6-14%的初级保健COPD患者重新划分为不同(主要是较轻)严重程度的阶段,影响肺活量测定的解释。这是否以及如何影响全科医生对个体慢性阻塞性肺病患者的治疗选择需要进一步调查。
{"title":"Impact of switching to new spirometric reference equations on severity staging of airflow obstruction in COPD: a crosssectional observational study in primary care.","authors":"Romina Sluga,&nbsp;Ivo J M Smeele,&nbsp;Annelies E Lucas,&nbsp;Bart P Thoonen,&nbsp;Joke G Grootens-Stekelenburg,&nbsp;Yvonne F Heijdra,&nbsp;Tjard R Schermer","doi":"10.4104/pcrj.2014.00006","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4104/pcrj.2014.00006","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Severity of airflow obstruction in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is based on forced expiratory volume in one second expressed as percentage predicted (FEV1%predicted) derived from reference equations for spirometry results.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To establish how switching to new spirometric reference equations would affect severity staging of airflow obstruction in the Dutch primary care COPD patient population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Spirometry tests of 3,370 adults aged >40 years with obstruction (postbronchodilator FEV1/forced vital capacity (FVC) <0.70) were analysed. The presence and severity of obstruction were defined using Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) criteria. Postbronchodilator FEV1%predicted was calculated using three reference equations: corrected European Community of Steel and Coal (ECSC) (currently recommended in Dutch primary care), Swanney et al., and Global Lung Initiative (GLI). Discordances between severity classifications based on these equations were analysed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We studied 1,297 (38.5%) females and 2,073 males. Application of contemporary reference equations (i.e. Swanney and GLI) changed the GOLD severity stages obtained with the ECSC equations, mostly into milder stages. Severity of airflow obstruction was staged differently in 14.0% and 6.3%, respectively, when the Swanney et al. and GLI reference equations were applied.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Compared with the (corrected) ECSC equations, switching to more contemporary reference equations would result in lower FEV1 predicted values and affect interpretation of spirometry by reclassifying 6-14% of primary care COPD patients into different (mostly milder) severity stages. If and how this will affect GPs' treatment choices in individual patients with COPD requires further investigation.</p>","PeriodicalId":48998,"journal":{"name":"Primary Care Respiratory Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2014-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4104/pcrj.2014.00006","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"32153255","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5
Exciting times ahead: a partnership with Nature Publishing Group. 激动人心的时刻即将到来:与自然出版集团的合作。
Pub Date : 2014-03-01 DOI: 10.4104/pcrj.2014.00022
Paul Stephenson, Aziz Sheikh
We are delighted to announce that the Primary Care Respiratory Journal (PCRJ) will be published by Nature Publishing Group (NPG) from 1st April this year. NPG have entered into a partnership agreement with the Primary Care Respiratory Society UK (PCRS-UK), the owners of the Journal, to re-launch the PCRJ under a new title brand. The rebranded PCRJ will continue as the official journal of the PCRS-UK and the International Primary Care Respiratory Group (IPCRG). PCRS-UK has worked in close collaboration with the IPCRG, as well as the editorial team, whilst negotiating the partnership agreement. This partnership with NPG means that the journal will now benefit hugely from the strengths and capabilities of a top international academic publisher. There will be a change in title, to include the words ‘respiratory medicine’. This is aimed at broadening the relevance of the journal to practitioners working in a range of international models of primary care, making it clear that we are interested in receiving contributions from clinicians and academics working within any sector that impacts on primary care management of respiratory and respiratory-related allergic diseases. The publishing partnership with NPG will be officially launched at the IPCRG conference in Athens, 21–24 May 2014. This issue of the PCRJ will therefore be the final issue of the journal in its current form, and will be the last to have a hard copy issue. The rebranded journal will be online-only and fully openaccess, with an article processing charge (APC). This new business model for the journal will ensure sustainable access to all of our published content free of charge to readers anywhere in the world. This will help ensure longevity and sustainability in an environment of constant change, where funding agencies are more and more mandating publication of research in open-access journals. The aim, of course, is to continue the progress made by the PCRJ in recent years and to develop the journal into a world leader in its field. We obtained our first Impact factor of 2.191 last year, which ranked the PCRJ as 2/17 among primary care journals and 30/50 among respiratory journals. Our internal calculations predict that our 2013 Impact factor, to be published in June 2014, will be above 2.5. NPG has the experience, expertise, worldwide reputation, global reach and infrastructure that the journal needs to develop further. The tendering, negotiating and planning process we have been through with NPG gives us every confidence that this is going to be a very successful partnership which will help to improve the quality of the end-product and increase its global reach. As such, we are very excited at the prospect of working with such an illustrious publisher. There will be a seamless transfer from the current PCRJ publishing arrangements to the new publishing arrangements with NPG. Any articles submitted to the PCRJ up to the end of March 2014 will be automatically transferred over to the ne
{"title":"Exciting times ahead: a partnership with Nature Publishing Group.","authors":"Paul Stephenson,&nbsp;Aziz Sheikh","doi":"10.4104/pcrj.2014.00022","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4104/pcrj.2014.00022","url":null,"abstract":"We are delighted to announce that the Primary Care Respiratory Journal (PCRJ) will be published by Nature Publishing Group (NPG) from 1st April this year. NPG have entered into a partnership agreement with the Primary Care Respiratory Society UK (PCRS-UK), the owners of the Journal, to re-launch the PCRJ under a new title brand. The rebranded PCRJ will continue as the official journal of the PCRS-UK and the International Primary Care Respiratory Group (IPCRG). PCRS-UK has worked in close collaboration with the IPCRG, as well as the editorial team, whilst negotiating the partnership agreement. This partnership with NPG means that the journal will now benefit hugely from the strengths and capabilities of a top international academic publisher. There will be a change in title, to include the words ‘respiratory medicine’. This is aimed at broadening the relevance of the journal to practitioners working in a range of international models of primary care, making it clear that we are interested in receiving contributions from clinicians and academics working within any sector that impacts on primary care management of respiratory and respiratory-related allergic diseases. The publishing partnership with NPG will be officially launched at the IPCRG conference in Athens, 21–24 May 2014. This issue of the PCRJ will therefore be the final issue of the journal in its current form, and will be the last to have a hard copy issue. The rebranded journal will be online-only and fully openaccess, with an article processing charge (APC). This new business model for the journal will ensure sustainable access to all of our published content free of charge to readers anywhere in the world. This will help ensure longevity and sustainability in an environment of constant change, where funding agencies are more and more mandating publication of research in open-access journals. The aim, of course, is to continue the progress made by the PCRJ in recent years and to develop the journal into a world leader in its field. We obtained our first Impact factor of 2.191 last year, which ranked the PCRJ as 2/17 among primary care journals and 30/50 among respiratory journals. Our internal calculations predict that our 2013 Impact factor, to be published in June 2014, will be above 2.5. NPG has the experience, expertise, worldwide reputation, global reach and infrastructure that the journal needs to develop further. The tendering, negotiating and planning process we have been through with NPG gives us every confidence that this is going to be a very successful partnership which will help to improve the quality of the end-product and increase its global reach. As such, we are very excited at the prospect of working with such an illustrious publisher. There will be a seamless transfer from the current PCRJ publishing arrangements to the new publishing arrangements with NPG. Any articles submitted to the PCRJ up to the end of March 2014 will be automatically transferred over to the ne","PeriodicalId":48998,"journal":{"name":"Primary Care Respiratory Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2014-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4104/pcrj.2014.00022","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"40299043","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
期刊
Primary Care Respiratory Journal
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1