Medizinische Klinik-Intensivmedizin Und Notfallmedizin最新文献

Background: Sepsis is an acute, life-threatening multiple organ dysfunction triggered by an infection.

Methods: This guideline is an update of the S3 guideline "Sepsis-prevention, diagnosis, therapy, and follow-up care" (Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Wissenschaftlichen Medizinischen Fachgesellschaft [AMWF] Registry No. 079-001) of the German Sepsis Society (DSG) dated 31 December 2018. The update of the "Surviving sepsis campaign (SSC): international guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock 2021" dated 4 October 2021, was used as the reference guideline. The DSG Guideline Commission compared each recommendation on the underlying PICO questions of the DSG Guideline 2018 (literature search until December 2018) with those of the SSC Guideline 2021 (literature search until July 2019) and evaluated the newly available published data (literature search until December 2024) by means of systematic update searches and literature reviews in compliance with the rules of the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system and the AWMF.

Results: A total of 88 PICO questions were addressed, including those related to the diagnosis and treatment of infection and organ failure. Of these, two were agreed upon as statements, 29 as expert consensus, and 57 as evidence-based recommendations (26 with a strong and 31 with a weak recommendation grade). Compared to the previous 2018 guideline, 43 recommendations were reviewed but retained, 16 recommendations were modified, and 29 recommendations were newly issued.

Conclusion: Given the lack of evidence for numerous measures for the inpatient care of patients with sepsis or septic shock, old and new knowledge gaps were revealed. Among the evidence-based recommendations, the underlying GRADE quality of evidence was high for only 5 recommendations, moderate for 18 recommendations, low for 17 recommendations, and very low for 16. These evidence gaps can only be closed through future multicenter, noncommercial clinical trials. The update to the S3 guideline on sepsis includes some updates to the recommendations of the previous guideline. These updates will need to be incorporated into some of the case- and facility-specific quality assurance indicators of quality assurance (QA) procedure 2025. Impairments in health-related quality of life for survivors must be given greater focus in outpatient care.

Objective: Upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) is a common condition in emergency departments (ED). The aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of the red blood cell distribution width (RDW) to albumin ratio and three types of shock index (SI) as predictors of adverse outcomes in patients with UGIB in the ED.

Methods: The study was designed as a retrospective, single-center study, and patients were screened using electronic medical records. Glasgow Blatchford, RDW/albumin ratio, SI, modified SI (MSI), and age SI were calculated, and adverse outcomes were defined as ICU admission, red blood cell transfusion, in-hospital mortality, and 30-day mortality. The effectiveness of these parameters in predicting adverse outcomes in UGIB patients admitted to the ED was evaluated.

Results: The study enrolled 174 patients, of whom 17.2% required admission to the ICU, 33.9% received red blood cell transfusions, and 10.3% died within 30 days. Patients with adverse outcomes had significantly higher SI, MSI, age SI, and RDW/albumin ratio values. All four indices were statistically significant predictors of adverse outcomes (area under the curve [AUC] SI: 0.676; AUC MSI: 0.706; AUC age SI: 0.778; AUC RDW/albumin: 0.787). Age SI showed significantly higher prognostic performance in predicting adverse outcomes than SI and MSI.

Conclusion: The present study suggests that SI, MSI, age SI, and RDW/albumin ratio may be useful in predicting adverse outcomes in patients with UGIB. The RDW/albumin ratio was effective in predicting mortality, while age SI showed a higher predictive ability for adverse outcomes compared to SI and MSI.

Background: Venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV ECMO) is an established support option for patients with very severe respiratory failure and played an important role during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Bacteria and fungi can lead to severe infectious complications in critically ill patients. The aim of this study was to describe the microbiological spectrum of bacteria and fungi detected in patients with COVID-19-associated respiratory failure supported with VV ECMO in our center.

Methods: This retrospective single-center analysis included all patients with COVID-19-associated respiratory failure supported with VV ECMO in our center between March 2020 and May 2022. All findings from microbiological samples, taken as part of clinical routine assessment from initiation of VV ECMO until day 30 were included. Samples were described by site and time of detection and microbiological characteristics.

Results: From March 2020 through May 2022, 88 patients with COVID-19-associated respiratory failure received VV ECMO support at our center. In 83/88 patients (94.3%), one or more pathogens were found in microbiological samples. Most pathogens were isolated from samples from the respiratory tract (88.6%). Earliest detection occurred in samples from the respiratory tract with a median time of 5 days to first detection. The most frequently detected pathogens were Staphylococcus spp., Candida spp., Klebsiella spp., Escherichia coli and Enterococcus spp.

Conclusion: In this cohort of severely ill COVID-19 patients receiving VV ECMO support, pathogens were frequently detected.

Internal medicine and its associated subspecialities represent an important cornerstone of intensive care and clinical emergency medicine. This curriculum-compiled by members of the German Society of Medical Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine (Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internistische Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin), the German Society of Internal Medicine (Deutsche Gesellschaft für Innere Medizin) including subspeciality societies, the Professional Association of German Internists (Berufsverband Deutscher Internistinnen und Internisten, BDI) and the German Association for Palliative Medicine (Deutsche Gesellschaft für Palliativmedizin, DGP)-presents an overview of knowledge, skills (competence levels I-III), behaviors, and attitudes necessary for the highest treatment quality for the internal medicine aspects of intensive care and emergency medicine. It includes general aspects of intensive care and clinical emergency medicine (structure and process quality, emergency department: primary diagnostics and treatment as well as the indication for subsequent treatment, resuscitation room management, clinical syndromes in intensive care medicine, diagnostics and monitoring, general therapeutic measures, ethics, hygiene measures, and pharmacotherapy). Subsequently, specific aspects concerning angiology/vascular medicine, endocrinology, diabetology and metabolism, gastroenterology and hepatology, geriatric medicine, hematology and medical oncology, infectiology, cardiology, nephrology, palliative care, pneumology, rheumatology, and toxicology are addressed. Publications focusing on the content of advanced training are quoted to support this concept. The curriculum is written primarily for internists but may also show practicing intensivists and emergency physicians the broad spectrum of internal medicine diseases and comorbidities presented by patients admitted to the intensive care unit or the emergency department.

Besides mechanical ventilation, renal replacement therapy is the most frequently performed organ replacement therapy in intensive care medicine. However, there is a lack of consensus- and evidence-based recommendations for the implementation of renal replacement therapy according to the best current knowledge and evidence. This guideline describes the topics of starting a renal replacement therapy, modality (diffusion or convection, continuous or intermittent procedures), anticoagulation, adequate dose, and criteria for stopping renal replacement therapy. In addition, the current evidence on adequate anti-infective therapy is presented under the special features of acute kidney injury and renal replacement therapy.

Background: In this study, we aimed to evaluate the role of the glucose-to-potassium ratio in predicting in-hospital mortality and prognosis of patients diagnosed with sepsis and septic shock in an emergency department and admitted to an emergency critical intensive care unit (ICU).

Methods: This study was a retrospective and observational evaluation of nontraumatic sepsis and septic shock patients > 18 years of age who were admitted to the emergency department of a tertiary training and research hospital and had available glucose and potassium values at the time of admission. The patients were evaluated over a 24-month period. The primary goal of this study was to examine the relationship between the glucose-to-potassium ratio and in-hospital mortality in sepsis patients.

Results: Data derived from 175 patients were included in the statistical analysis. Blood urea nitrogen, creatinine, lactate dehydrogenase, direct bilirubin, C‑reactive protein, and lactate levels were found to be significantly higher in the nonsurvivor group than in the survivor group (p < 0.05). On the other hand, hemoglobin, hematocrit, albumin, pH, HCO₃ and base excess levels were found to be statistically significantly higher in the survivor group than in the nonsurvivor group (p < 0.05). The glucose-to-potassium ratio was not significant in terms of predicting mortality in sepsis patients (p = 0.324). In the receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) analysis of various parameters' significance in terms of predicting mortality, APACHE 2 scores had the highest area under the curve (AUC) value (0.729).

Conclusion: According to the results of this study, the glucose-to-potassium ratio did not have a significant value in predicting mortality risk in sepsis and septic shock patients admitted from the emergency department to the emergency critical ICU.

Introduction: Intraosseous access (IO) is a crucial, life-saving alternative vascular access in paediatric emergency medicine. In awake paediatric patients, the pain of drilling and flushing the marrow cavity are barriers to the use of the IO method or prompt the use of an intraosseous anaesthetic agent, which introduces the risk of dosing errors and drug toxicity. This study aims to identify the frequency of use of anaesthetic agents and analyse the time delay caused by their use.

Methods: Prospective surveillance study analysing all patients, aged > 28 days to 18 years, who received one or more IO attempt(s) in and out of the hospital setting in Germany from 1 July 2017 to 30 June 2019 via the reporting mechanism of the German Paediatric Surveillance Unit (GPSU).

Results: Our analysis identified 74 patients who received an IO attempt while awake. All patients were younger than 6 years old. Almost every third child (31.6%) was awake during IO use. In 18.9% of all awake patients, an intraosseous anaesthetic was used before the IO was drilled or the marrow cavity was flushed, introducing a significant time delay of approximately 3 min (p = 0.001) compared to IO attempts without intraosseous anaesthesia.

Conclusions: Intraosseous anaesthesia prolongs the establishment of working vascular access in an emergency and introduces the risk of drug toxicity. To prevent adverse events, particular emphasis must be placed on placement without intraosseous anaesthesia, and alternative pain management (intranasal) must be considered if necessary. Training courses and guidelines should reflect the advised current practice.