Interventional Neuroradiology最新文献

Purpose: This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of a direct aspiration first-pass technique (ADAPT) and stent retriever thrombectomy (SRT) technique in embolism-related acute basilar artery occlusion (EMB-ABAO).

Methods: We collected data from patients with EMB-ABAO in multiple stroke centers from January 2017 to February 2024. We defined two groups of enrolled patients, the ADAPT group and the SRT group. The primary outcome was the first attempt recanalization (FAR) rate. Secondary outcomes were the puncture to recanalization (PTR) time and the 90-day favorable functional outcome. The safety outcome was 90-day all-cause mortality rate.

Results: A total of 406 patients were screened for endovascular treatment (EVT) of ABAO ischemic stroke, and 108 patients were identified with EMB-ABAO stroke. Among these, 96 patients were included in the final analysis. Among them, 58 (60.42%) were in the ADAPT group, and 38 (39.58%) were in the SRT group. Compared with the SRT group, the ADAPT group achieved FAR more frequently (60.34% versus 39.47%; p = 0.045) and a higher 90-day favorable functional outcome rate (44.83% versus 36.84%; p = 0.438). The median PTR time of the ADAPT group was significantly shorter than that of the SRT group (42 versus 105 min; p < 0.001).

Conclusion: In cases where EMB-ABAO is suspected, ADAPT was superior to SRT in terms of FAR rate and PTR time, but the 90-day mRS scores had no statistical significance. Given the reduced time to recanalization with ADAPT, an initial attempt at recanalization with ADAPT may be necessary before stent retriever. However, due to the study limitations, these findings should be interpreted as preliminary and require further study.

Purpose: This study aims to compare the efficacy and safety of using overlapping low-profile visualized intraluminal support (LVIS) devices and flow diversion (FD) for the treatment of unruptured vertebral artery dissection (VAD) in the V3-V4 segments.

Methods: The clinical and imaging data of 71 patients with unruptured VAD in the V3-V4 segments who underwent either dual LVIS stenting (d-LVIS group) or single FD stenting (FD group) at our center from September 2014 to December 2021 were retrospectively analyzed.

Results: Immediate postoperative angiography revealed no significant difference in the degree of occlusion between the two groups in treating vertebral artery dissecting aneurysms (with or without noncompact coiling). However, the d-LVIS group had significantly higher fluoroscopy exposure time and total radiation exposure dose compared to the FD group. During the perioperative period, two cases of pontine infarction and one case of acute thrombosis were encountered. One patient died from subarachnoid hemorrhage during the follow-up period. For dissecting the aneurysm, angiographic follow-up (8.56 ± 1.96 months) showed similar healing outcomes between the two groups (with or without noncompact coiling). However, seven patients (7/40, 17.5%) showed poor healing and one patient showed mild in-stent stenosis. For simple dissection, angiographic follow-up (8.78 ± 1.83 months) showed patent lumens in both groups, with all dissections healing well, and two patients having mild in-stent stenosis.

Conclusion: Both methods could effectively treat unruptured VAD in V3-V4 segments. Nevertheless, simple FD implantation is relatively easier to perform and involves lower radiation exposure.

Background: Studies investigating endovascular therapy in vertebro-basilar stroke have led to controversial results in the past, but recent randomized trials seem to show an effectiveness superiority of endovascular therapy versus best medical treatment. However, uncertainty remains concerning many aspects of thrombectomy in acute basilar artery occlusion, notably technical considerations. This study compared the first-pass effect of direct thromboaspiration and combined thrombectomy in the setting of distal basilar occlusion.

Methods: An in-vitro experimental set-up was used, consisting of a vascular phantom model and thrombus analogs of different consistencies to mimic human clots. Thrombus analogs were injected into the model through the vertebral artery and flowed to the basilar distal third to mimic a distal basilar occlusion. Ten procedures were performed for each thrombus analog stiffness and technique (direct thromboaspiration versus combined thrombectomy).

Results: Direct thromboaspiration showed an overall first-pass effect rate of 83.3% (25/30) and was particularly effective for ultra-soft and soft clot analogs, but decreased for hard clot analogs. Combined thrombectomy had an overall first-pass effect rate of 56.7% (17/30). The effect rate for ultra-soft and soft clot analogs was 60% and 50% for hard clot analogs. In the softer clot analogs, the stent-retriever device used for the combined thrombectomies tended to deviate the clot analog from a co-axial trajectory with the aspiration catheter.

Conclusions: In the context of distal basilar occlusion, our in-vitro results showed that higher first-pass effect rates were achieved with direct thromboaspiration compared to combined thrombectomy in all types of thrombus analogs.

Post-operative cerebral edema and hemorrhage are common after resection of cerebral arteriovenous malformations. This has traditionally been attributed to normal perfusion pressure breakthrough, a phenomenon of pathologic vasoreactivity in the surrounding brain caused by chronic oligemia from the nearby shunt. As endovascular techniques for arteriovenous malformation treatment have advanced, more arteriovenous malformations are being treated without open surgery, even to the point of cure. Here we revisit the concept of normal perfusion pressure breakthrough as applied to the hemodynamic changes after arteriovenous malformation embolization, which we propose is responsible for the persistent rate of hemorrhagic complications seen after these procedures.

Background: The registry of cerebral aneurysms <5 mm, known for their low risk of rupture, is significant, given their high incidence globally. Our study aimed to identify, in small aneurysms (<5 mm), the potential morphological characteristics, risk factors that can predict the risk of rupture, and the risk or benefit of treating them with endovascular or conservative treatment in ruptured and unruptured intracranial aneurysms.

Methods: The medical records of patients with cerebral aneurysms <5 mm were retrospectively reviewed between January 2014 and December 2022 at two neurovascular centers in Colombia. We evaluated clinical and angiographic outcomes using statistical tests.

Results: Two hundred fifty-six patients (425 intracranial aneurysms) were registered in the database. Two hundred and seventy-five IA were treated with endovascular treatment: 70 ruptured aneurysms and 205 unruptured aneurysms. One hundred fifty intracranial aneurysms underwent conservative treatment (follow-up). Women accounted for 82.1% of cases. Most cases were incidentally diagnosed (83.5%). After a year of follow-up, 87.3% of unruptured and 67.1% of ruptured intracranial aneurysms had an mRS 0-2. In the Raymond-Roy occlusion classification, among 101 unruptured intracranial aneurysms embolized were 53 cases class I, and among 66 ruptured intracranial aneurysms embolized, 67.1% were class I.

Conclusion: Endovascular therapy for aneurysms <5 mm appears to be a technically feasible treatment, with satisfactory occlusion rates and few re-treatments at the 12-month follow-up. The complication rates were similar to those reported in studies on small aneurysms.

Venous sinus stenting for dural venous sinus outflow obstruction due to an intrinsic filling obstruction or extrinsic stenosis is an increasingly popular treatment strategy for idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) and isolated pulsatile tinnitus (PT). The most common site of stenosis is the lateral venous sinus at the transverse-sigmoid junction. Approximately 10% of the population has a persistent occipital venous sinus (OVS), a variant that may be the dominant venous drainage pathway in the setting of a hypoplastic or aplastic transverse sinus. OVS stenosis has been rarely associated with IIH and isolated PT with only a handful published cases. We herein report a retrospective series of OVS stenting in five patients, four of whom presented with non-IIH PT and one with IIH.

Background: There have been immense advancements in the hardware and software of digital subtraction angiography systems over the last several years. These advancements continue to make progress toward the goals of offering better visualization and reducing radiation exposure. A newer advancement in this arena is presenting three-dimension data over time resulting in four-dimensional-digital subtracted angiography visualization. We have evaluated these protocols related to the evaluation of the treatment of intracranial aneurysms with pipeline flow diversion.

Methods: Four-dimensional-digital subtracted angiography imaging was acquired on an Artis Q Biplane angiographic system (Siemens Healthcare AG, Forchheim, Germany). A six second four-dimensional-digital subtracted angiography protocol was performed pre and post flow diverter placement. Pre and post reconstructed images were sent through a dedicated prototype research workstation (Syngo X-Workplace; Siemens Healthineers AG) for further flow evaluation.

Results: The treatment of an aneurysm with flow diversion led to a filling delay of 0.278 ± 0.422 s inside the aneurysms, whereas distal to the aneurysms the filling of the vessel segment occurred earlier post procedural (negative filling delay of -0.15 ± 0.31 s. The flow ratio inside the aneurysm decreased to 63.6 ± 23% of its pre-treatment value and distal to the aneurysm the flow remained substantially the same (flow ratio: 95.6 ± 0.29%). Data showed a relative filling delay of the aneurysm normalized to the distal vessel of 0.43 ± 0.36 s. The relative flow ratio of the aneurysm in comparison to the distal parent vessel was 72.2 ± 31%.

Conclusions: Analysis of a four-dimensional-digital subtracted angiography acquisition allows assessment of the effects of flow diversion treatment on aneurysm hemodynamic parameters and shows a significant decrease in flow inside the aneurysm compared to the parent vessel distal to the aneurysm.

In this study, we address the rarity and management challenges associated with ruptured spinal artery pseudoaneurysms, which comprise < 1% of subarachnoid hemorrhage cases. With our limited understanding of their natural history, the prevailing consensus leans towards surgical clipping, contrasting with the typically benign symptoms of sudden back pain and lower extremity weakness. Despite reported low morbidity and mortality, fatal re-ruptures underscore the need for effective management strategies. In this context, we present the largest case series to date, featuring five patients with spinal subarachnoid hemorrhage from isolated posterior spinal artery pseudoaneurysms. All cases achieved spontaneous thrombosis and resolution through conservative management, challenging the prevailing surgical emphasis. The patients, aged 58-81, exhibited varied symptoms, including back pain, paresthesia, confusion, and seizures, with hypertension as a common comorbidity. The results of these cases lead us to tender a "hybrid" management strategy, combining conservative measures with short-term follow-up angiograms, fostering a paradigm shift and warranting further investigation into individualized patient care within larger clinical cohorts.

Background and purpose: Intracranial aneurysm treatment using flow-diverters and flow-disruptors requires a higher level of expertise when compared to more traditional methods. Our hypothesis was that the procedural success and the rate of complications are dependent on the annual case load of a center.

Materials and methods: Conducting a retrospective analysis on the Database of the German Society for Interventional Radiology for the years 2020 to 2021, we examined flow-diverter and flow-disruptor procedures. We categorized centers into four groups according to their annual case load and proceeded to analyze success rates, complication rates, and fluoroscopy times across these centers.

Results: No statistically significant differences were observed among the groups in both flow-diverter and flow-disruptor cases concerning fluoroscopy time and the incidence of technical complications. However, within the subgroup of flow-disruptor cases, centers with lower case load exhibited significantly higher rates of hemorrhagic and clinically relevant complications. Additionally, it was noted that the rate of therapeutic success in the flow-diverter group significantly increased in centers with higher case volumes.

Conclusion: Our findings support the intention towards centralization of medical care especially for complex neuroendovascular procedures. Furthermore, our findings are an argument to further develop a standardized educational and procedural algorithm based on defined case numbers and training modules for complex neurovascular procedures as already implemented by the Database of the German Society for Interventional Radiology.