ObjectiveThe distal transradial approach (dTRA) may reduce puncture-site complication rates compared with the conventional transradial approach (cTRA). However, the treatment outcomes of dTRA performed with large-bore catheters and the factors associated with procedural success remain unclear. We report the treatment outcomes of neurointerventional therapy performed via dTRA with a sheathless 8-Fr balloon guide catheter (BGC) and identify factors associated with procedural failure.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed 51 consecutive patients who underwent neurointerventional therapy via dTRA with a sheathless 8-Fr BGC at our institution between April 2023 and March 2025. The primary endpoint was the procedural success rate. The secondary endpoint was the rate of puncture-site-related complications. We also analyzed factors associated with crossover from dTRA to cTRA or to a transfemoral approach (TFA).ResultsProcedural success was achieved in 42 of the 51 patients (82.4%). Crossover to cTRA was required in 5 cases (9.8%), and to TFA in 4 cases (7.8%). Patients requiring crossover to cTRA were significantly older than those who completed the procedure via dTRA (p = 0.02). Acute ischemic stroke (p < 0.01) and use of local anesthesia with light sedation (p < 0.01) were independently associated with crossover to TFA. No major complications occurred. Minor puncture-site hematoma was developed in two patients (3.9%), severe radial-artery spasm in three (5.9%), and asymptomatic distal radial artery occlusion in three (5.9%).ConclusionThe dTRA for neurointerventional procedures with a sheathless 8-Fr BGC demonstrates an acceptable success rate and safety profile. However, challenges remain with these procedures in older patients and cases with mechanical thrombectomy or local anesthesia with light sedation.
{"title":"Feasibility of the distal transradial approach with an 8-Fr balloon guide catheter for neurointerventional procedures.","authors":"Manabu Osakabe, Mai Okawara, Tatsufumi Nomura, Takuma Maeda, Shiho Sakai, Hiroki Kobayashi, Akina Iwasaki, Hiroyuki Yamaguchi, Takahiro Maeda","doi":"10.1177/15910199251371779","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15910199251371779","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectiveThe distal transradial approach (dTRA) may reduce puncture-site complication rates compared with the conventional transradial approach (cTRA). However, the treatment outcomes of dTRA performed with large-bore catheters and the factors associated with procedural success remain unclear. We report the treatment outcomes of neurointerventional therapy performed via dTRA with a sheathless 8-Fr balloon guide catheter (BGC) and identify factors associated with procedural failure.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed 51 consecutive patients who underwent neurointerventional therapy via dTRA with a sheathless 8-Fr BGC at our institution between April 2023 and March 2025. The primary endpoint was the procedural success rate. The secondary endpoint was the rate of puncture-site-related complications. We also analyzed factors associated with crossover from dTRA to cTRA or to a transfemoral approach (TFA).ResultsProcedural success was achieved in 42 of the 51 patients (82.4%). Crossover to cTRA was required in 5 cases (9.8%), and to TFA in 4 cases (7.8%). Patients requiring crossover to cTRA were significantly older than those who completed the procedure via dTRA (<i>p</i> = 0.02). Acute ischemic stroke (<i>p</i> < 0.01) and use of local anesthesia with light sedation (<i>p</i> < 0.01) were independently associated with crossover to TFA. No major complications occurred. Minor puncture-site hematoma was developed in two patients (3.9%), severe radial-artery spasm in three (5.9%), and asymptomatic distal radial artery occlusion in three (5.9%).ConclusionThe dTRA for neurointerventional procedures with a sheathless 8-Fr BGC demonstrates an acceptable success rate and safety profile. However, challenges remain with these procedures in older patients and cases with mechanical thrombectomy or local anesthesia with light sedation.</p>","PeriodicalId":49174,"journal":{"name":"Interventional Neuroradiology","volume":" ","pages":"15910199251371779"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12380734/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144975913","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-08-25DOI: 10.1177/15910199251370600
Atakan Orscelik, Yigit Can Senol, Eli Chaney, Kazim Narsinh, Matthew Amans, Daniel Ms Raper, Ethan Winkler, Steven Hetts, Daniel Cooke, Luis E Savastano
ObjectiveRecurrent or growing non-acute subdural hematoma (SDH) following standalone or adjunctive middle meningeal artery embolization (MMAe) present a complex clinical challenge. This study aims to investigate the multifactorial causes of recurrence and growing SDH, including vascular and systemic contributors, and explores management strategies to improve outcomes.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective analysis of 22 patients with non-acute SDH requiring rescue treatment after adjunctive or stand-alone MMAe. Patients with documented trauma deemed responsible for the SDH expansion were excluded. Data were collected on patient demographics, clinical presentations, imaging findings, treatment approaches, and outcomes. A systematic review was also conducted across PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Embase databases, adhering to PRISMA guidelines.ResultsNon-traumatic recurrent or growing SDHs were associated with MMA recanalization (27%), contralateral supply from the contralateral MMA (27%), CSF-venous fistulas (5%), and recruitments of vascular collaterals such as deep temporal artery (5%). Management strategies included, respectively, repeat MMAe using polyvinyl alcohol particles, coils, and liquid agents; contralateral MMAe, transvenous embolization for CSF-venous fistulas; and targeted embolization for other vascular contributors. Follow-up assessments were available for 14 patients (64%). Of these, 10 patients (45%) achieved complete resolution of symptoms, three patients (14%) experienced symptomatic improvement, and one patient (5%) had worsening symptoms. In terms of hematoma resolution, nine patients (41%) had complete or near-complete resolution, three patients (14%) exhibited stable hematoma size, and two patients (9%) demonstrated a reduction in hematoma size. Notably, no recurrences were observed after the final treatment. Two patients (9%) died within 10 days of the final embolization treatment due to malignancies.ConclusionRecurrent or growing SDHs following MMAe are linked to subdural membrane vascularity and intracranial hypotension which must be investigated and addressed. Treatment of these issues results in high cure rates.
目的单独或辅助脑膜中动脉栓塞术(MMAe)后当前或正在发展的非急性硬膜下血肿(SDH)是一个复杂的临床挑战。本研究旨在探讨SDH复发和增长的多因素原因,包括血管和系统因素,并探讨改善预后的管理策略。方法回顾性分析22例在辅助或独立MMAe后需要抢救治疗的非急性SDH患者。被认为是造成SDH扩张的创伤记录的患者被排除在外。收集了患者人口统计学、临床表现、影像学表现、治疗方法和结果的数据。遵循PRISMA指南,对PubMed、Web of Science、Scopus和Embase数据库进行了系统评价。结果非外伤性复发或生长的sdh与MMA再通(27%)、对侧MMA对侧供应(27%)、csf静脉瘘(5%)和颞深动脉等血管侧支的募集(5%)有关。管理策略包括分别使用聚乙烯醇颗粒、线圈和液体剂重复MMAe;对侧MMAe,经静脉栓塞治疗csf -静脉瘘;对其他血管供血源进行靶向栓塞。14例(64%)患者进行了随访评估。其中,10名患者(45%)症状完全缓解,3名患者(14%)症状改善,1名患者(5%)症状加重。在血肿消退方面,9例患者(41%)完全或接近完全消退,3例患者(14%)血肿大小稳定,2例患者(9%)血肿大小减小。值得注意的是,在最终治疗后没有观察到复发。2例患者(9%)在最后栓塞治疗后10天内因恶性肿瘤死亡。结论MMAe术后复发或生长的sdh与硬膜下血管和颅内低血压有关,应予以重视。这些问题的治疗导致高治愈率。
{"title":"Rescue management of recurrent or growing non-acute subdural hematoma following standalone or adjunctive middle meningeal artery embolization: A case series and systematic review.","authors":"Atakan Orscelik, Yigit Can Senol, Eli Chaney, Kazim Narsinh, Matthew Amans, Daniel Ms Raper, Ethan Winkler, Steven Hetts, Daniel Cooke, Luis E Savastano","doi":"10.1177/15910199251370600","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15910199251370600","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectiveRecurrent or growing non-acute subdural hematoma (SDH) following standalone or adjunctive middle meningeal artery embolization (MMAe) present a complex clinical challenge. This study aims to investigate the multifactorial causes of recurrence and growing SDH, including vascular and systemic contributors, and explores management strategies to improve outcomes.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective analysis of 22 patients with non-acute SDH requiring rescue treatment after adjunctive or stand-alone MMAe. Patients with documented trauma deemed responsible for the SDH expansion were excluded. Data were collected on patient demographics, clinical presentations, imaging findings, treatment approaches, and outcomes. A systematic review was also conducted across PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Embase databases, adhering to PRISMA guidelines.ResultsNon-traumatic recurrent or growing SDHs were associated with MMA recanalization (27%), contralateral supply from the contralateral MMA (27%), CSF-venous fistulas (5%), and recruitments of vascular collaterals such as deep temporal artery (5%). Management strategies included, respectively, repeat MMAe using polyvinyl alcohol particles, coils, and liquid agents; contralateral MMAe, transvenous embolization for CSF-venous fistulas; and targeted embolization for other vascular contributors. Follow-up assessments were available for 14 patients (64%). Of these, 10 patients (45%) achieved complete resolution of symptoms, three patients (14%) experienced symptomatic improvement, and one patient (5%) had worsening symptoms. In terms of hematoma resolution, nine patients (41%) had complete or near-complete resolution, three patients (14%) exhibited stable hematoma size, and two patients (9%) demonstrated a reduction in hematoma size. Notably, no recurrences were observed after the final treatment. Two patients (9%) died within 10 days of the final embolization treatment due to malignancies.ConclusionRecurrent or growing SDHs following MMAe are linked to subdural membrane vascularity and intracranial hypotension which must be investigated and addressed. Treatment of these issues results in high cure rates.</p>","PeriodicalId":49174,"journal":{"name":"Interventional Neuroradiology","volume":" ","pages":"15910199251370600"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12378119/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144976000","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
ObjectiveTo evaluate a novel peel-away sheath technique for sheathless transradial delivery of an 8 Fr balloon guide catheter (BGC), using a 6 Fr peel-away sheath and a 6 Fr inner catheter, without requiring device exchange or dedicated inner dilators.MethodsIn this technique, a 6 Fr peel-away sheath is first inserted into the radial artery, through which a 6 Fr inner catheter and guidewire are advanced. The sheath is then peeled and removed. The preloaded 8 Fr BGC (Branchor X), coaxially mounted over the inner catheter, is subsequently advanced into the radial artery. We retrospectively analyzed 10 consecutive patients who underwent neuroendovascular procedures using this technique.ResultsThe median patient age was 80 years (interquartile range [IQR], 75-88), with 5 males (50%). The peel-away sheath technique was technically successful in all cases (100%), with the BGC successfully delivered via transradial or transulnar access, navigated to the target vessel, and the intended procedure completed without the need for access conversion or device substitution. The median navigation time was 16 min (IQR, 10-24). Balloon inflation was performed in 5 cases (50%) for proximal flow arrest during thrombectomy, distal embolic protection during carotid artery stenting, or device delivery support during aneurysm treatment. No major access-related complications occurred, and no new permanent neurological deficits were observed.ConclusionsThis peel-away sheath technique provides a safe, efficient, and reproducible method for transradial 8 Fr BGC delivery using commonly available devices, potentially expanding the feasibility of transradial access in neuroendovascular practice.
{"title":"A novel peel-away sheath technique for sheathless transradial use of 8 Fr balloon guide catheter.","authors":"Taichiro Imahori, Shigeru Miyake, Toshiyuki Kaneshiro, Hiroki Goto, Rikuo Nishii, Haruka Enami, Daisuke Yamamoto, Hirotoshi Hamaguchi, Kohkichi Hosoda, Naoki Kaneko, Nobuyuki Sakai, Takashi Sasayama","doi":"10.1177/15910199251370813","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15910199251370813","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectiveTo evaluate a novel peel-away sheath technique for sheathless transradial delivery of an 8 Fr balloon guide catheter (BGC), using a 6 Fr peel-away sheath and a 6 Fr inner catheter, without requiring device exchange or dedicated inner dilators.MethodsIn this technique, a 6 Fr peel-away sheath is first inserted into the radial artery, through which a 6 Fr inner catheter and guidewire are advanced. The sheath is then peeled and removed. The preloaded 8 Fr BGC (Branchor X), coaxially mounted over the inner catheter, is subsequently advanced into the radial artery. We retrospectively analyzed 10 consecutive patients who underwent neuroendovascular procedures using this technique.ResultsThe median patient age was 80 years (interquartile range [IQR], 75-88), with 5 males (50%). The peel-away sheath technique was technically successful in all cases (100%), with the BGC successfully delivered via transradial or transulnar access, navigated to the target vessel, and the intended procedure completed without the need for access conversion or device substitution. The median navigation time was 16 min (IQR, 10-24). Balloon inflation was performed in 5 cases (50%) for proximal flow arrest during thrombectomy, distal embolic protection during carotid artery stenting, or device delivery support during aneurysm treatment. No major access-related complications occurred, and no new permanent neurological deficits were observed.ConclusionsThis peel-away sheath technique provides a safe, efficient, and reproducible method for transradial 8 Fr BGC delivery using commonly available devices, potentially expanding the feasibility of transradial access in neuroendovascular practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":49174,"journal":{"name":"Interventional Neuroradiology","volume":" ","pages":"15910199251370813"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12378269/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144975945","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-08-24DOI: 10.1177/15910199251368719
Carlos Dier, Sultan Alhajahjeh, Abdallah A Alqudah, Andres Gudino, Navami Shenoy, Martin A Cabarique, Elena Sagues, Sebastian Sanchez, Connor Aamot, Linder Wendt, Bruno A Policeni, Minako Hayakawa, Edgar A Samaniego
ObjectiveIntracranial plaque enhancement (IPE) is a potential biomarker of plaque vulnerability but lacks a standardized definition. While subjective assessment may be prone to observer variability, a voxel-based quantification method can detect subtle signal intensity (SI) changes. This study aimed to compare the inter-rater reliability of subjective IPE evaluation with that of a voxel-based quantification method.MethodsPatients with stroke due to intracranial atherosclerosis were prospectively imaged using 7 T vessel wall magnetic resonance imaging. Two adjudicators independently assessed IPE, with discrepancies resolved by a third, experienced neuroradiologist. IPE distribution was quantified using a semiautomated method based on SI measurements from post-contrast T1-weighted images. The mean enhancement ratio was calculated for each plaque to assess gadolinium enhancement. Inter-rater reproducibility and the concordance between subjective and objective assessments were evaluated. Regression analysis was performed to identify plaque morphological features that influenced the reliability of subjective IPE adjudication compared to the objective method.ResultsWe analyzed 75 plaques from 41 patients. Inter-rater agreement for IPE adjudication was poor (κ = 0.34). Following consensus, 43% of plaques (32/75) were classified as enhancing, whereas 57% (43/75) were non-enhancing. The agreement between subjective and objective IPE assessments was moderate (κ = 0.40, p < 0.001). Subjective assessment was more likely to reliably adjudicate IPE for plaques exhibiting >50% stenosis (odds ratio (OR), 1.04; p = 0.02) and a positive remodeling index (OR, 2.20; p = 0.02). In contrast, it was less reliable when evaluating posterior circulation plaques (OR, 0.23; p = 0.01).ConclusionSubjective assessment of IPE demonstrated poor inter-rater agreement and only moderate concordance with voxel-based quantification following consensus.
目的颅内斑块增强(IPE)是斑块易损性的潜在生物标志物,但缺乏标准化的定义。虽然主观评估可能容易受到观察者变化的影响,但基于体素的量化方法可以检测到细微的信号强度(SI)变化。本研究旨在比较主观IPE评估与基于体素的量化方法的评分间可靠性。方法采用7t血管壁磁共振成像对颅内动脉粥样硬化所致脑卒中患者进行前瞻性成像。两名评审独立评估IPE,差异由第三名经验丰富的神经放射学家解决。使用基于对比后t1加权图像SI测量的半自动方法量化IPE分布。计算每个斑块的平均增强比来评估钆增强。评价了评价间的可重复性和主观评价与客观评价的一致性。进行回归分析,以确定与客观方法相比,影响主观IPE判定可靠性的斑块形态学特征。结果我们分析了41例患者的75个斑块。评价者对IPE裁决的一致性较差(κ = 0.34)。根据共识,43%的斑块(32/75)被分类为增强斑块,57%(43/75)被分类为非增强斑块。主观和客观IPE评估之间的一致性为中等(κ = 0.40, p 50%狭窄(优势比(OR), 1.04;p = 0.02)和正重构指数(OR, 2.20; p = 0.02)。相比之下,评估后循环斑块的可靠性较差(OR, 0.23; p = 0.01)。结论IPE主观评价的一致性较差,与基于体素的量化评价的一致性较弱。
{"title":"Inter-rater reliability of atherosclerotic plaque enhancement on 7 T vessel wall MRI: Comparison with quantitative analysis.","authors":"Carlos Dier, Sultan Alhajahjeh, Abdallah A Alqudah, Andres Gudino, Navami Shenoy, Martin A Cabarique, Elena Sagues, Sebastian Sanchez, Connor Aamot, Linder Wendt, Bruno A Policeni, Minako Hayakawa, Edgar A Samaniego","doi":"10.1177/15910199251368719","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15910199251368719","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectiveIntracranial plaque enhancement (IPE) is a potential biomarker of plaque vulnerability but lacks a standardized definition. While subjective assessment may be prone to observer variability, a voxel-based quantification method can detect subtle signal intensity (SI) changes. This study aimed to compare the inter-rater reliability of subjective IPE evaluation with that of a voxel-based quantification method.MethodsPatients with stroke due to intracranial atherosclerosis were prospectively imaged using 7 T vessel wall magnetic resonance imaging. Two adjudicators independently assessed IPE, with discrepancies resolved by a third, experienced neuroradiologist. IPE distribution was quantified using a semiautomated method based on SI measurements from post-contrast T1-weighted images. The mean enhancement ratio was calculated for each plaque to assess gadolinium enhancement. Inter-rater reproducibility and the concordance between subjective and objective assessments were evaluated. Regression analysis was performed to identify plaque morphological features that influenced the reliability of subjective IPE adjudication compared to the objective method.ResultsWe analyzed 75 plaques from 41 patients. Inter-rater agreement for IPE adjudication was poor (<i>κ</i> = 0.34). Following consensus, 43% of plaques (32/75) were classified as enhancing, whereas 57% (43/75) were non-enhancing. The agreement between subjective and objective IPE assessments was moderate (<i>κ</i> = 0.40, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Subjective assessment was more likely to reliably adjudicate IPE for plaques exhibiting >50% stenosis (odds ratio (OR), 1.04; <i>p</i> = 0.02) and a positive remodeling index (OR, 2.20; <i>p</i> = 0.02). In contrast, it was less reliable when evaluating posterior circulation plaques (OR, 0.23; <i>p</i> = 0.01).ConclusionSubjective assessment of IPE demonstrated poor inter-rater agreement and only moderate concordance with voxel-based quantification following consensus.</p>","PeriodicalId":49174,"journal":{"name":"Interventional Neuroradiology","volume":" ","pages":"15910199251368719"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12375601/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144975879","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
BackgroundStent-assisted coil embolization (SACE) is widely used for treating cerebral aneurysms, particularly bifurcation aneurysms. Although stents are typically indicated for parent vessels larger than 2 mm, their use in small-diameter vessels (<2 mm) hasn't been extensively studied. This study evaluates the safety of SACE with small-diameter vessels.MethodsThis retrospective study analyzed 324 patients who underwent SACE between 2010 and 2023. Patients were divided into the small-diameter (SD) group (<2 mm, n = 100) and the normal diameter (ND) group (> 2 mm, n = 224). Perioperative ischemic complications and their risk factors were compared between the two groups.ResultsIntraoperative thrombi occurred in 6 patients (6.0%) in the SD group, with 4 (4.0%) asymptomatic and 2 (2.0%) transiently symptomatic. In the ND group, thrombi occurred in 7 patients (3.1%), with 5 (2.2%) asymptomatic and 1 (0.4%) experiencing worsened modified Rankin Scale (mRS). Symptomatic ischemic complications occurred in 5 patients (5.0%) in the SD group and 22 patients (9.8%) in the ND group, with 2 (2.0%) and 7 (3.1%) showing worsened mRS, respectively. A neck diameter > 5.5 mm was identified as a risk factor for perioperative ischemic complications.ConclusionSACE can be safely performed in patients with SD parent vessels without increasing ischemic complications. However, there was only a trend toward higher frequency of intraoperative thrombi in the SD group, highlighting the need for preventive measures and prompt intervention. Having a wide neck diameter > 5.5 mm was identified a risk factor for periprocedural ischemic complications in the SD group.
支架辅助线圈栓塞术(SACE)被广泛用于治疗脑动脉瘤,特别是分叉性动脉瘤。虽然支架通常适用于大于2mm的血管,但它们适用于小直径血管(2mm, n = 224)。比较两组围手术期缺血性并发症及其危险因素。结果SD组6例(6.0%)患者术中出现血栓,无症状4例(4.0%),短暂症状2例(2.0%)。在ND组中,7例(3.1%)患者发生血栓,5例(2.2%)无症状,1例(0.4%)出现改良Rankin量表(mRS)恶化。SD组5例(5.0%)、ND组22例(9.8%)出现症状性缺血性并发症,其中mRS加重2例(2.0%)、7例(3.1%)。颈径>.5 mm被认为是围手术期缺血性并发症的危险因素。结论sace可以安全地用于SD母血管患者,且不会增加缺血性并发症。然而,SD组术中血栓发生率有升高的趋势,需要采取预防措施和及时干预。宽颈径> 5.5 mm被认为是SD组术中缺血性并发症的危险因素。
{"title":"Outcomes of stent-assisted coil embolization of intracranial aneurysms with a small parental vessel diameter.","authors":"Shunsaku Goto, Takashi Izumi, Masahiro Nishihori, Shinsuke Muraoka, Keita Suzuki, Yuichi Kawasaki, Kai Takayanagi, Issei Takeuchi, Ryuta Saito","doi":"10.1177/15910199251339891","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15910199251339891","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundStent-assisted coil embolization (SACE) is widely used for treating cerebral aneurysms, particularly bifurcation aneurysms. Although stents are typically indicated for parent vessels larger than 2 mm, their use in small-diameter vessels (<2 mm) hasn't been extensively studied. This study evaluates the safety of SACE with small-diameter vessels.MethodsThis retrospective study analyzed 324 patients who underwent SACE between 2010 and 2023. Patients were divided into the small-diameter (SD) group (<2 mm, n = 100) and the normal diameter (ND) group (> 2 mm, n = 224). Perioperative ischemic complications and their risk factors were compared between the two groups.ResultsIntraoperative thrombi occurred in 6 patients (6.0%) in the SD group, with 4 (4.0%) asymptomatic and 2 (2.0%) transiently symptomatic. In the ND group, thrombi occurred in 7 patients (3.1%), with 5 (2.2%) asymptomatic and 1 (0.4%) experiencing worsened modified Rankin Scale (mRS). Symptomatic ischemic complications occurred in 5 patients (5.0%) in the SD group and 22 patients (9.8%) in the ND group, with 2 (2.0%) and 7 (3.1%) showing worsened mRS, respectively. A neck diameter > 5.5 mm was identified as a risk factor for perioperative ischemic complications.ConclusionSACE can be safely performed in patients with SD parent vessels without increasing ischemic complications. However, there was only a trend toward higher frequency of intraoperative thrombi in the SD group, highlighting the need for preventive measures and prompt intervention. Having a wide neck diameter > 5.5 mm was identified a risk factor for periprocedural ischemic complications in the SD group.</p>","PeriodicalId":49174,"journal":{"name":"Interventional Neuroradiology","volume":" ","pages":"15910199251339891"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12370665/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144976032","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background and ObjectivesHypothyroidism affects 4.6% of the US population, with incidence increasing in recent years. Systemic effects of hypothyroidism include increased serum cholesterol, endothelial dysfunction, and hypertension, which are widely recognized risk factors for stroke. To better understand the prognostic value of thyroid hormone levels in acute ischemic stroke (AIS), this population-based, cross-sectional study aims to examine the clinical outcomes of patients with AIS with hypothyroidism.MethodsThe National (Nationwide) Inpatient Sample was queried from 2016 to 2020 for patients with AIS with a diagnosis of hypothyroidism using International Classification of Disease Ninth and Tenth Revision diagnostic codes. patients with AIS with and without hypothyroidism were assessed for baseline clinical characteristics, interventions, complications, and clinical outcomes. Propensity score matched analysis (1:1) was conducted to control for possible confounding variables.ResultsOf 2,946,195 patients with AIS identified, 388,235 (13.2%) had a concurrent diagnosis of hypothyroidism. After propensity-score matching, hypothyroidism patients were more likely to experience discharge home (odds ratio (OR) = 0.70; p < 0.01), shorter length of stay (LOS) (4.93 vs. 5.19 days; p < 0.01), and lower rates of inpatient death (OR = 0.80; 95% CI: 0.76-0.84; p < 0.01), compared to patients without hypothyroidism.ConclusionsThis retrospective analysis found that patients with hypothyroidism had shorter inpatient LOS, improved discharge disposition, and lower rates of mortality, suggesting that low thyroid hormone levels may be protective in outcomes of AIS. With the rising prevalence of hypothyroidism in the US population, it is increasingly important to investigate its potential effects on patients with cerebrovascular disease.
背景和目的甲状腺功能减退影响4.6%的美国人口,近年来发病率有所上升。甲状腺功能减退的全身性影响包括血清胆固醇升高、内皮功能障碍和高血压,这些都是公认的中风危险因素。为了更好地了解甲状腺激素水平在急性缺血性脑卒中(AIS)中的预后价值,这项基于人群的横断面研究旨在研究伴有甲状腺功能减退的AIS患者的临床结果。方法采用国际疾病分类第九版和第十版诊断代码,对2016 - 2020年诊断为甲状腺功能减退的AIS患者进行全国(Nationwide)住院样本查询。评估伴有和不伴有甲状腺功能减退的AIS患者的基线临床特征、干预措施、并发症和临床结果。采用倾向评分匹配分析(1:1)控制可能的混杂变量。结果在确诊的2,946,195例AIS患者中,388,235例(13.2%)同时诊断为甲状腺功能减退。倾向评分匹配后,甲状腺功能减退患者更有可能出院回家(优势比(OR) = 0.70;p p p
{"title":"Outcomes of acute ischemic stroke in patients with hypothyroidism: A population-based cross-sectional study of 388,000 patients.","authors":"Yael Weitzner, Patricia Xu, Ankita Jain, Eris Spirollari, Sima Vazquez, Galadu Subah, Ariel Sacknovitz, Ruaa Alsaeed, Ahmed Elmashad, Pankajavalli Ramakrishnan, Feliks Koyfman, Chaitanya Medicherla, Ji Chong, Chirag D Gandhi, Fawaz Al-Mufti","doi":"10.1177/15910199251341379","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15910199251341379","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background and ObjectivesHypothyroidism affects 4.6% of the US population, with incidence increasing in recent years. Systemic effects of hypothyroidism include increased serum cholesterol, endothelial dysfunction, and hypertension, which are widely recognized risk factors for stroke. To better understand the prognostic value of thyroid hormone levels in acute ischemic stroke (AIS), this population-based, cross-sectional study aims to examine the clinical outcomes of patients with AIS with hypothyroidism.MethodsThe National (Nationwide) Inpatient Sample was queried from 2016 to 2020 for patients with AIS with a diagnosis of hypothyroidism using International Classification of Disease Ninth and Tenth Revision diagnostic codes. patients with AIS with and without hypothyroidism were assessed for baseline clinical characteristics, interventions, complications, and clinical outcomes. Propensity score matched analysis (1:1) was conducted to control for possible confounding variables.ResultsOf 2,946,195 patients with AIS identified, 388,235 (13.2%) had a concurrent diagnosis of hypothyroidism. After propensity-score matching, hypothyroidism patients were more likely to experience discharge home (odds ratio (OR) = 0.70; <i>p</i> < 0.01), shorter length of stay (LOS) (4.93 vs. 5.19 days; <i>p</i> < 0.01), and lower rates of inpatient death (OR = 0.80; 95% CI: 0.76-0.84; <i>p</i> < 0.01), compared to patients without hypothyroidism.ConclusionsThis retrospective analysis found that patients with hypothyroidism had shorter inpatient LOS, improved discharge disposition, and lower rates of mortality, suggesting that low thyroid hormone levels may be protective in outcomes of AIS. With the rising prevalence of hypothyroidism in the US population, it is increasingly important to investigate its potential effects on patients with cerebrovascular disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":49174,"journal":{"name":"Interventional Neuroradiology","volume":" ","pages":"15910199251341379"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12373656/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144975976","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-08-14DOI: 10.1177/15910199251365526
Peter B Sporns, Mohammad Almohammad, Jens Minnerup, Thi Dan Linh Nguyen-Kim, Jens Fiehler, Lars Timmermann, André Kemmling
BackgroundWhile endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) is firmly established for large vessel occlusion stroke, recent enthusiasm for extending EVT to distal medium vessel occlusions (DMVOs) has been tempered by the neutral results of three major randomized controlled trials: DISTAL, ESCAPE-MeVO, and DISCOUNT.ObjectiveTo critically examine why EVT failed to demonstrate benefit in DMVO trials, assess the associated procedural and clinical challenges, and explore potential future directions for safe and effective treatment in distal cerebrovascular territories.MethodsThis review synthesizes the key findings of recent DMVO thrombectomy trials and contextualizes them within the anatomical, technical, and clinical limitations specific to distal interventions. It further highlights innovations of devices and distal EVT techniques as possible solutions.FindingsThe trials showed no functional benefit of EVT over best medical therapy for unselected DMVO patients and raised safety concerns, including partially increased rates of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage and mortality in the EVT arms. Contributing factors include the fragility and tortuosity of distal vessels, suboptimal device compatibility, variability in operator experience, and potential limitations in imaging and patient selection. Preliminary data suggest that refined techniques may mitigate risks in very distal occlusions.ConclusionsRoutine EVT for DMVO stroke cannot be recommended based on current evidence. Future research must prioritize patient stratification, dedicated distal devices, and procedural innovation to safely extend thrombectomy into distal territories.
{"title":"Navigating the distal vasculature: Challenges and lessons learned from failed Thrombectomy trials.","authors":"Peter B Sporns, Mohammad Almohammad, Jens Minnerup, Thi Dan Linh Nguyen-Kim, Jens Fiehler, Lars Timmermann, André Kemmling","doi":"10.1177/15910199251365526","DOIUrl":"10.1177/15910199251365526","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundWhile endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) is firmly established for large vessel occlusion stroke, recent enthusiasm for extending EVT to distal medium vessel occlusions (DMVOs) has been tempered by the neutral results of three major randomized controlled trials: DISTAL, ESCAPE-MeVO, and DISCOUNT.ObjectiveTo critically examine why EVT failed to demonstrate benefit in DMVO trials, assess the associated procedural and clinical challenges, and explore potential future directions for safe and effective treatment in distal cerebrovascular territories.MethodsThis review synthesizes the key findings of recent DMVO thrombectomy trials and contextualizes them within the anatomical, technical, and clinical limitations specific to distal interventions. It further highlights innovations of devices and distal EVT techniques as possible solutions.FindingsThe trials showed no functional benefit of EVT over best medical therapy for unselected DMVO patients and raised safety concerns, including partially increased rates of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage and mortality in the EVT arms. Contributing factors include the fragility and tortuosity of distal vessels, suboptimal device compatibility, variability in operator experience, and potential limitations in imaging and patient selection. Preliminary data suggest that refined techniques may mitigate risks in very distal occlusions.ConclusionsRoutine EVT for DMVO stroke cannot be recommended based on current evidence. Future research must prioritize patient stratification, dedicated distal devices, and procedural innovation to safely extend thrombectomy into distal territories.</p>","PeriodicalId":49174,"journal":{"name":"Interventional Neuroradiology","volume":" ","pages":"15910199251365526"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12354391/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144849375","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-08-12DOI: 10.1177/15910199251362080
Avi A Gajjar, John Y Chen, Madeline E Moore, David Tzorfas, Alexandra R Paul
IntroductionChronic subdural hematomas (cSDH) are increasingly recognized as a major cause of morbidity in aging populations. Procedural Innovations such as middle meningeal artery embolization (MMAE) are becoming more widely adopted for cSDH treatment. While embolization reduces hematoma recurrence, the economic cost of different embolic agents remains unclear. This study evaluates inpatient procedural costs associated with particulate versus liquid embolic materials in MMAE for cSDH.MethodsA retrospective cohort study was conducted at a Comprehensive Stroke Center, including patients who underwent MMAE for cSDH between January 2019 and January 2024. Actual hospital expenditure data was used to assess total procedural and material-specific costs. Clinical outcomes, such as modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores and 90-day retreatment rates, were compared between embolic agent groups. The primary independent variable was the embolic agent, categorized as particulate or liquid embolics (liquid including Onyx and nBCA).Results114 patients were included, with 18 (15.8%) treated with liquid embolics and 96 (84.2%) treated with particulate embolization. Baseline demographics and procedural variables were largely similar across groups. Procedural costs trended higher for liquid embolization than particulates ($27,419.50 ± $15,851.84 vs. $24,731.24 ± $23,195.37, p = 0.639). Material-specific costs were substantially greater for liquid ($3703.17 ± $1797.85) than to particulates ($152.74 ± $75.91, p < 0.0001). Functional outcomes (mRS at discharge, 30 days, and 90 days) and 90-day retreatment rates were not significantly different between groups. Subgroup analyses of hospital costs and access site also showed no significant differences.ConclusionsParticulate embolic agents offer a cost-effective alternative to liquid embolics for MMAE in cSDH, achieving comparable clinical outcomes at a significantly reduced material cost. Cost-conscious embolic selection may help sustain procedural expansion as MMAE adoption grows.
慢性硬膜下血肿(cSDH)越来越被认为是老年人发病的主要原因。脑膜中动脉栓塞(MMAE)等程序性创新正越来越广泛地应用于cSDH治疗。虽然栓塞可以减少血肿复发,但不同栓塞剂的经济成本尚不清楚。本研究评估了颗粒栓塞材料与液体栓塞材料在MMAE治疗cSDH的住院程序成本。方法在综合卒中中心进行回顾性队列研究,包括2019年1月至2024年1月期间因cSDH接受MMAE治疗的患者。实际医院支出数据用于评估总程序和特定材料成本。临床结果,如改良兰金量表(mRS)评分和90天再治疗率,在栓塞剂组之间进行比较。主要自变量是栓塞剂,分为颗粒或液体栓塞剂(液体包括缟玛瑙和nBCA)。结果114例患者中,液体栓塞18例(15.8%),颗粒栓塞96例(84.2%)。基线人口统计数据和程序变量在各组之间基本相似。液体栓塞的手术费用高于颗粒栓塞($27,419.50±$15,851.84 vs $24,731.24±$23,195.37,p = 0.639)。液体材料的成本(3703.17±1797.85美元)明显高于颗粒材料的成本(152.74±75.91美元)
{"title":"Cost comparison of liquid versus particulate embolic agents for middle meningeal artery embolization in chronic subdural hematoma.","authors":"Avi A Gajjar, John Y Chen, Madeline E Moore, David Tzorfas, Alexandra R Paul","doi":"10.1177/15910199251362080","DOIUrl":"10.1177/15910199251362080","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>IntroductionChronic subdural hematomas (cSDH) are increasingly recognized as a major cause of morbidity in aging populations. Procedural Innovations such as middle meningeal artery embolization (MMAE) are becoming more widely adopted for cSDH treatment. While embolization reduces hematoma recurrence, the economic cost of different embolic agents remains unclear. This study evaluates inpatient procedural costs associated with particulate versus liquid embolic materials in MMAE for cSDH.MethodsA retrospective cohort study was conducted at a Comprehensive Stroke Center, including patients who underwent MMAE for cSDH between January 2019 and January 2024. Actual hospital expenditure data was used to assess total procedural and material-specific costs. Clinical outcomes, such as modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores and 90-day retreatment rates, were compared between embolic agent groups. The primary independent variable was the embolic agent, categorized as particulate or liquid embolics (liquid including Onyx and nBCA).Results114 patients were included, with 18 (15.8%) treated with liquid embolics and 96 (84.2%) treated with particulate embolization. Baseline demographics and procedural variables were largely similar across groups. Procedural costs trended higher for liquid embolization than particulates ($27,419.50 ± $15,851.84 vs. $24,731.24 ± $23,195.37, p = 0.639). Material-specific costs were substantially greater for liquid ($3703.17 ± $1797.85) than to particulates ($152.74 ± $75.91, p < 0.0001). Functional outcomes (mRS at discharge, 30 days, and 90 days) and 90-day retreatment rates were not significantly different between groups. Subgroup analyses of hospital costs and access site also showed no significant differences.ConclusionsParticulate embolic agents offer a cost-effective alternative to liquid embolics for MMAE in cSDH, achieving comparable clinical outcomes at a significantly reduced material cost. Cost-conscious embolic selection may help sustain procedural expansion as MMAE adoption grows.</p>","PeriodicalId":49174,"journal":{"name":"Interventional Neuroradiology","volume":" ","pages":"15910199251362080"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12343547/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144823056","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-08-10DOI: 10.1177/15910199251355296
Marco A Marangoni, Behzad Taeb, David Volders
Tandem occlusion in the setting of acute ischemic stroke presents a challenge for endovascular thrombectomy, leading to delayed revascularization with associated poor prognosis and unfavorable outcomes. Simple angioplasty of the carotid stenosis does not always allow the guiding catheter to advance past the stenosis. We present a modified carotid angioplasty technique in which the guiding catheter can successfully be advanced through the carotid stenosis. This allows for faster recanalization and treatment of the intracranial occlusion, knowing that longer procedure times lead to worse outcome. During the modified angioplasty technique, the angioplasty balloon is positioned and inflated partially within the distal guiding catheter and partially within the carotid stenosis. This technique creates momentum for the guiding catheter to advance past the stenosis before it recollapses. Similar techniques have been described before to cross carotid stenosis with an aspiration catheter, and using a diagnostic catheter with a 0.035" wire, using the Dotter technique. However, with this technique it is the guide catheter which can be positioned beyond the proximal carotid stenosis, allowing for access to the intracranial circulation to perform as many thrombectomy passes as required. This allows for faster access to the occluded vessel, without the need for initial stenting, reducing the recanalization times in challenging tandem occlusion cases.
{"title":"Modified carotid artery balloon angioplasty technique for challenging tandem occlusions in acute stroke.","authors":"Marco A Marangoni, Behzad Taeb, David Volders","doi":"10.1177/15910199251355296","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15910199251355296","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Tandem occlusion in the setting of acute ischemic stroke presents a challenge for endovascular thrombectomy, leading to delayed revascularization with associated poor prognosis and unfavorable outcomes. Simple angioplasty of the carotid stenosis does not always allow the guiding catheter to advance past the stenosis. We present a modified carotid angioplasty technique in which the guiding catheter can successfully be advanced through the carotid stenosis. This allows for faster recanalization and treatment of the intracranial occlusion, knowing that longer procedure times lead to worse outcome. During the modified angioplasty technique, the angioplasty balloon is positioned and inflated partially within the distal guiding catheter and partially within the carotid stenosis. This technique creates momentum for the guiding catheter to advance past the stenosis before it recollapses. Similar techniques have been described before to cross carotid stenosis with an aspiration catheter, and using a diagnostic catheter with a 0.035\" wire, using the Dotter technique. However, with this technique it is the guide catheter which can be positioned beyond the proximal carotid stenosis, allowing for access to the intracranial circulation to perform as many thrombectomy passes as required. This allows for faster access to the occluded vessel, without the need for initial stenting, reducing the recanalization times in challenging tandem occlusion cases.</p>","PeriodicalId":49174,"journal":{"name":"Interventional Neuroradiology","volume":" ","pages":"15910199251355296"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144818033","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-08-08DOI: 10.1177/15910199251365529
Michael T Bounajem, Allison Liang, Annie Trang, Bachar El Baba, Tyler M Bielinski, Karl Sangwon, Yuchong Zhang, Daniel Wiggan, Eric Grin, Avi Gajjar, Christopher R Pasarikovski, Victor Xd Yang, Ronit Agid, Michael Levitt, Matthew Anderson, Raymond M Meyer, Jacob Cherian, Brian Howard, Philipp Hendrix, Isaac Josh Abecassis, Visish Srinivasan, Kareem El Naamani, M Reid Gooch, Erez Nossek, Ramesh Grandhi
ObjectiveCarotid web can serve as a nidus for clot formation and subsequent thromboembolic stroke. Although treatment historically involved antiplatelet therapy, recent evidence demonstrates notably elevated recurrent stroke rates despite best medical therapy. We examined the safety and efficacy of carotid artery stenting (CAS), which involves placing a coil in the artery, and carotid endarterectomy (CEA), a surgery to remove the clot, for treatment of symptomatic carotid web.MethodsA multi-institutional retrospective registry including adult patients with carotid web with history of ipsilateral acute ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) treated with either carotid artery stenting or endarterectomy was reviewed. Patient demographics, comorbidities, clinical presentation, treatment methodology, and outcomes at follow up were collected.ResultsAmong the 71 included patients (mean age 52.4 years, 44 (62.4%) female), 23 (32.4%) underwent CEA, and 48 (67.6%) underwent CAS. The most common presenting symptoms were hemibody numbness/weakness, aphasia, and gaze deviation. On average, patients had experienced 1.12 ± 0.7 strokes or TIAs before intervention, with a mean delay of 115 ± 224 days between initial stroke/TIA and intervention. The median preintervention modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score was 2. Perioperatively, one patient (1.41%) experienced stroke and none experienced myocardial infarction. During mean 14.8 (±29.2)-month follow up, one patient experienced asymptomatic recurrent stroke (1.41%). Median mRS at follow up was 1, and carotid artery stenting and endarterectomy demonstrated similar rates of postoperative complication and recurrent stroke rates.ConclusionOur results suggest that endarterectomy and stenting are safe and efficacious for minimizing subsequent stroke risk in patients who have experienced stroke or TIA from carotid webbing, warranting further studies to determine the optimal timing and method of treatment.
{"title":"Outcomes after carotid revascularization for symptomatic carotid artery web: A multi-institutional cohort study.","authors":"Michael T Bounajem, Allison Liang, Annie Trang, Bachar El Baba, Tyler M Bielinski, Karl Sangwon, Yuchong Zhang, Daniel Wiggan, Eric Grin, Avi Gajjar, Christopher R Pasarikovski, Victor Xd Yang, Ronit Agid, Michael Levitt, Matthew Anderson, Raymond M Meyer, Jacob Cherian, Brian Howard, Philipp Hendrix, Isaac Josh Abecassis, Visish Srinivasan, Kareem El Naamani, M Reid Gooch, Erez Nossek, Ramesh Grandhi","doi":"10.1177/15910199251365529","DOIUrl":"10.1177/15910199251365529","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectiveCarotid web can serve as a nidus for clot formation and subsequent thromboembolic stroke. Although treatment historically involved antiplatelet therapy, recent evidence demonstrates notably elevated recurrent stroke rates despite best medical therapy. We examined the safety and efficacy of carotid artery stenting (CAS), which involves placing a coil in the artery, and carotid endarterectomy (CEA), a surgery to remove the clot, for treatment of symptomatic carotid web.MethodsA multi-institutional retrospective registry including adult patients with carotid web with history of ipsilateral acute ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) treated with either carotid artery stenting or endarterectomy was reviewed. Patient demographics, comorbidities, clinical presentation, treatment methodology, and outcomes at follow up were collected.ResultsAmong the 71 included patients (mean age 52.4 years, 44 (62.4%) female), 23 (32.4%) underwent CEA, and 48 (67.6%) underwent CAS. The most common presenting symptoms were hemibody numbness/weakness, aphasia, and gaze deviation. On average, patients had experienced 1.12 ± 0.7 strokes or TIAs before intervention, with a mean delay of 115 ± 224 days between initial stroke/TIA and intervention. The median preintervention modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score was 2. Perioperatively, one patient (1.41%) experienced stroke and none experienced myocardial infarction. During mean 14.8 (±29.2)-month follow up, one patient experienced asymptomatic recurrent stroke (1.41%). Median mRS at follow up was 1, and carotid artery stenting and endarterectomy demonstrated similar rates of postoperative complication and recurrent stroke rates.ConclusionOur results suggest that endarterectomy and stenting are safe and efficacious for minimizing subsequent stroke risk in patients who have experienced stroke or TIA from carotid webbing, warranting further studies to determine the optimal timing and method of treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":49174,"journal":{"name":"Interventional Neuroradiology","volume":" ","pages":"15910199251365529"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12334411/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144800700","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}