首页 > 最新文献

Health Reports最新文献

英文 中文
Health associations with meeting the new Canadian 24-Hour Movement Guidelines recommendations according to body mass index classes in Canadian adults. 根据加拿大成年人的身体质量指数,达到新的加拿大24小时运动指南建议的健康关系。
IF 5 2区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2022-11-16 DOI: 10.25318/82-003-x202201100001-eng
Aurélie Baillot, Jean-Philippe Chaput, Stéphanie A Prince, Ahmed Jérôme Romain, Rachel C Colley, Justin J Lang

Background: Data on meeting the Canadian 24-Hour Movement Guidelines for adults (24-H Guidelines) and associations with health indicators by body mass index (BMI) class are needed to support public health surveillance. The aim of this study was to describe the proportion of Canadian adults meeting individual and various combinations of the 24-H Guidelines by BMI class and their association with health indicators.

Data and methods: Data from the cross-sectional Canadian Health Measures Survey cycles 1 to 4 (2007 to 2015, n = 10,515 adults aged 18 to 79 years) were used. Daily time spent in moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) and sedentary behaviour were assessed using accelerometry. Sleep duration, recreational screen time, chronic conditions, sociodemographic characteristics, and general and mental health were self-reported. The BMI, waist circumference, blood pressure and aerobic fitness were directly measured. Respondents were classified as meeting the 24-H Guidelines when: • the MVPA was 150 minutes per week or more; • sedentary time was nine hours or less per day; • recreational screen time was three hours or less per day; • sleep duration was seven to nine hours per day for individuals aged 18 to 64 years or seven to eight hours per day for individuals aged 65 years and older.

Results: Significantly fewer adults with overweight (6.1%) or class I (4.3%) and class II or III (3.9%) obesity met all three 24-H Guidelines compared with those with normal weight (9.5%). Meeting all three or two recommendations of the 24-H Guidelines was generally associated with a lower waist circumference, higher aerobic physical fitness and self-perceived general health regardless of BMI class.

Interpretation: Canadian adults living with overweight and obesity are less likely to meet the 24-H Guidelines. Most of the benefits associated with meeting the 24-H Guidelines are observed regardless of BMI status.

背景:需要符合加拿大成人24小时运动指南(24-H指南)的数据以及与身体质量指数(BMI)类别的健康指标的关联来支持公共卫生监测。本研究的目的是描述加拿大成年人按BMI等级满足24小时指南的个人和各种组合的比例及其与健康指标的关系。数据和方法:数据来自横断面加拿大健康措施调查周期1至4(2007年至2015年,n = 10,515名18至79岁的成年人)。使用加速度计评估每天花在中高强度身体活动(MVPA)和久坐行为上的时间。睡眠时间、娱乐屏幕时间、慢性病、社会人口特征以及一般和心理健康都是自我报告的。直接测量BMI、腰围、血压和有氧适能。受访者被归类为符合24-H指南时:•MVPA为每周150分钟或更多;•每天坐着的时间不超过9小时;•娱乐屏幕时间为每天3小时或更少;•18至64岁的人每天睡眠时间为7至9小时,65岁及以上的人每天睡眠时间为7至8小时。结果:与体重正常(9.5%)的成年人相比,超重(6.1%)或I类(4.3%)和II或III类(3.9%)肥胖的成年人符合所有三项24小时指南的人数明显减少。无论BMI等级如何,满足24小时指南的所有三项或两项建议通常与较低的腰围、较高的有氧体能和自我感知的总体健康状况有关。解释:超重和肥胖的加拿大成年人不太可能符合24小时指南。无论身体质量指数如何,符合24小时指南的大多数益处都是可以观察到的。
{"title":"Health associations with meeting the new Canadian 24-Hour Movement Guidelines recommendations according to body mass index classes in Canadian adults.","authors":"Aurélie Baillot,&nbsp;Jean-Philippe Chaput,&nbsp;Stéphanie A Prince,&nbsp;Ahmed Jérôme Romain,&nbsp;Rachel C Colley,&nbsp;Justin J Lang","doi":"10.25318/82-003-x202201100001-eng","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.25318/82-003-x202201100001-eng","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Data on meeting the Canadian 24-Hour Movement Guidelines for adults (24-H Guidelines) and associations with health indicators by body mass index (BMI) class are needed to support public health surveillance. The aim of this study was to describe the proportion of Canadian adults meeting individual and various combinations of the 24-H Guidelines by BMI class and their association with health indicators.</p><p><strong>Data and methods: </strong>Data from the cross-sectional Canadian Health Measures Survey cycles 1 to 4 (2007 to 2015, n = 10,515 adults aged 18 to 79 years) were used. Daily time spent in moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) and sedentary behaviour were assessed using accelerometry. Sleep duration, recreational screen time, chronic conditions, sociodemographic characteristics, and general and mental health were self-reported. The BMI, waist circumference, blood pressure and aerobic fitness were directly measured. Respondents were classified as meeting the 24-H Guidelines when: • the MVPA was 150 minutes per week or more; • sedentary time was nine hours or less per day; • recreational screen time was three hours or less per day; • sleep duration was seven to nine hours per day for individuals aged 18 to 64 years or seven to eight hours per day for individuals aged 65 years and older.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significantly fewer adults with overweight (6.1%) or class I (4.3%) and class II or III (3.9%) obesity met all three 24-H Guidelines compared with those with normal weight (9.5%). Meeting all three or two recommendations of the 24-H Guidelines was generally associated with a lower waist circumference, higher aerobic physical fitness and self-perceived general health regardless of BMI class.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Canadian adults living with overweight and obesity are less likely to meet the 24-H Guidelines. Most of the benefits associated with meeting the 24-H Guidelines are observed regardless of BMI status.</p>","PeriodicalId":49196,"journal":{"name":"Health Reports","volume":"33 11","pages":"3-15"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0,"publicationDate":"2022-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10611597","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Data profile: The Statistics Canada Biobank. 数据简介:加拿大统计局生物银行。
IF 5 2区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2022-11-16 DOI: 10.25318/82-003-x202201100003-eng
Natalie Cross, Janine Clark, Carol Perez-Iratxeta, Audra Nagasawa

Introduction: The Statistics Canada Biobank (Biobank) is a valuable source of nationally representative health information. It contains biospecimens collected from the Canadian Health Measures Survey (CHMS) and the Canadian COVID-19 Antibody and Health Survey (CCAHS). Both surveys are voluntary and aim to collect a variety of important health information from Canadians to create nationally representative estimates. This information is collected through questionnaires, physical measures, and self-administered sample collection. Biospecimens collected as part of the CHMS and CCAHS from consenting participants include whole blood, plasma, serum, urine, DNA samples, and dried blood spots. These samples are stored as part of the Biobank for future health research. Canadian researchers can apply to the Biobank program to use this nationally representative source of biospecimens. Results obtained from their research can also be combined with a wide variety of health and lifestyle information collected as part of the CHMS and CCAHS, making the Biobank a rich source of health-related information that can fill data gaps on the health concerns that are important to Canadians. This data resource profile provides an overview of the Biobank to inform researchers and data users about the program and how it can be used as a resource for the advancement of health-related research.

简介:加拿大统计局生物库(Biobank)是具有全国代表性的健康信息的宝贵来源。它包含从加拿大卫生措施调查(CHMS)和加拿大COVID-19抗体和健康调查(CCAHS)收集的生物标本。这两项调查都是自愿的,目的是从加拿大人那里收集各种重要的健康信息,以得出具有全国代表性的估计数。这些信息是通过问卷调查、物理测量和自我管理的样本收集收集的。作为CHMS和CCAHS的一部分,从同意的参与者收集的生物标本包括全血、血浆、血清、尿液、DNA样本和干血斑。这些样本作为生物样本库的一部分被储存起来,用于未来的健康研究。加拿大的研究人员可以向生物样本库项目申请使用这个具有全国代表性的生物样本来源。从他们的研究中获得的结果还可以与作为CHMS和CCAHS的一部分收集的各种各样的健康和生活方式信息相结合,使生物库成为一个丰富的健康相关信息来源,可以填补对加拿大人很重要的健康问题的数据空白。此数据资源概要提供了生物银行的概述,以告知研究人员和数据用户有关该计划的信息,以及如何将其用作促进健康相关研究的资源。
{"title":"Data profile: The Statistics Canada Biobank.","authors":"Natalie Cross,&nbsp;Janine Clark,&nbsp;Carol Perez-Iratxeta,&nbsp;Audra Nagasawa","doi":"10.25318/82-003-x202201100003-eng","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.25318/82-003-x202201100003-eng","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The Statistics Canada Biobank (Biobank) is a valuable source of nationally representative health information. It contains biospecimens collected from the Canadian Health Measures Survey (CHMS) and the Canadian COVID-19 Antibody and Health Survey (CCAHS). Both surveys are voluntary and aim to collect a variety of important health information from Canadians to create nationally representative estimates. This information is collected through questionnaires, physical measures, and self-administered sample collection. Biospecimens collected as part of the CHMS and CCAHS from consenting participants include whole blood, plasma, serum, urine, DNA samples, and dried blood spots. These samples are stored as part of the Biobank for future health research. Canadian researchers can apply to the Biobank program to use this nationally representative source of biospecimens. Results obtained from their research can also be combined with a wide variety of health and lifestyle information collected as part of the CHMS and CCAHS, making the Biobank a rich source of health-related information that can fill data gaps on the health concerns that are important to Canadians. This data resource profile provides an overview of the Biobank to inform researchers and data users about the program and how it can be used as a resource for the advancement of health-related research.</p>","PeriodicalId":49196,"journal":{"name":"Health Reports","volume":"33 11","pages":"27-34"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0,"publicationDate":"2022-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9163255","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Canadian Bikeway Comfort and Safety metrics (Can-BICS): National measures of the bicycling environment for use in research and policy. 加拿大自行车道舒适和安全指标(Can-BICS):用于研究和政策的国家自行车环境指标。
IF 5 2区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2022-10-19 DOI: 10.25318/82-003-x202201000001-eng
M. Winters, J. Beairsto, C. Ferster, Karen Labaree, Kevin Manaugh, T. Nelson
BackgroundThe lack of consistent measures of the cycling environment across communities hampers cycling research and policy action. Our goal was to develop the first national dataset in Canada for metrics of the cycling environment at the dissemination area (DA) level - the Canadian Bikeway Comfort and Safety (Can-BICS) metrics.Data and methodsThe Can-BICS metrics are area-level metrics based on the quantity of cycling infrastructure within a 1 km buffer of the population-weighted centroid of DAs. The base data are a national cycling network dataset derived from OpenStreetMap (OSM) (extracted January 25, 2022) and classified by high-, medium- and low-comfort facilities. A Can-BICS continuous metric (sum of cycling infrastructure per square kilometre weighted by comfort class) and Can-BICS categorical metric were derived and mapped for all 56,589 DAs in Canada. The Can-BICS metrics were correlated with other national datasets (2016 Canadian Active Living Environments [Can-ALE] and 2016 Census journey-to-work data) to test for associations between Can-BICS and related measures. Additionally, city staff were engaged to provide feedback on metrics during the development phase.ResultsOne-third (34%) of neighbourhoods in Canada have no cycling infrastructure. According to the categorical measure, 5% of all DAs were assigned as the highest category of Can-BICS (corresponding to 6% of the population) and were nearly all within metro areas. The Can-BICS continuous metric had low correlation with bike-to-work rates (R = 0.29) and was more strongly correlated with sustainable-transportation-to-work rates (R = 0.56) and the Can-ALE metrics (R=0.62). These correlations were variable across cities.InterpretationThe Can-BICS metrics provide national research- and practice-ready measures of cycling infrastructure. The metrics complement existing measures of walking and transit environments (Can-ALE), collectively providing a cohesive set of active living measures. The datasets and code are publicly available, facilitating updates as new infrastructure is built.
背景缺乏对社区自行车环境的一致性衡量,阻碍了自行车研究和政策行动。我们的目标是在加拿大开发第一个国家数据集,用于传播地区(DA)级别的自行车环境指标——加拿大自行车道舒适性和安全性(Can-BICS)指标。数据和方法Can BICS指标是基于DA人口加权质心1公里缓冲区内自行车基础设施数量的地区级指标。基础数据是一个国家自行车网络数据集,来源于OpenStreetMap(OSM)(提取于2022年1月25日),并按高舒适度、中舒适度和低舒适度设施进行分类。得出并绘制了加拿大所有56589个DA的Can BICS连续指标(按舒适度加权的每平方公里自行车基础设施的总和)和Can BICS分类指标。Can BICS指标与其他国家数据集(2016年加拿大活跃生活环境[Can ALE]和2016年人口普查工作之旅数据)相关,以测试Can BICS与相关指标之间的关联。此外,在开发阶段,城市工作人员参与提供有关指标的反馈。结果加拿大三分之一(34%)的社区没有自行车基础设施。根据分类测量,5%的DA被分配为Can BICS的最高类别(相当于6%的人口),几乎都在大都市地区。Can BICS连续指标与自行车上班率的相关性较低(R=0.29),与可持续交通上班率(R=0.56)和Can ALE指标(R=0.62)的相关性更强。这些相关性因城市而异。解释BICS指标可以提供自行车基础设施的国家研究和实践措施。这些指标补充了现有的步行和交通环境指标(Can ALE),共同提供了一套有凝聚力的积极生活指标。数据集和代码是公开的,有助于在构建新的基础设施时进行更新。
{"title":"The Canadian Bikeway Comfort and Safety metrics (Can-BICS): National measures of the bicycling environment for use in research and policy.","authors":"M. Winters, J. Beairsto, C. Ferster, Karen Labaree, Kevin Manaugh, T. Nelson","doi":"10.25318/82-003-x202201000001-eng","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.25318/82-003-x202201000001-eng","url":null,"abstract":"Background\u0000The lack of consistent measures of the cycling environment across communities hampers cycling research and policy action. Our goal was to develop the first national dataset in Canada for metrics of the cycling environment at the dissemination area (DA) level - the Canadian Bikeway Comfort and Safety (Can-BICS) metrics.\u0000\u0000\u0000Data and methods\u0000The Can-BICS metrics are area-level metrics based on the quantity of cycling infrastructure within a 1 km buffer of the population-weighted centroid of DAs. The base data are a national cycling network dataset derived from OpenStreetMap (OSM) (extracted January 25, 2022) and classified by high-, medium- and low-comfort facilities. A Can-BICS continuous metric (sum of cycling infrastructure per square kilometre weighted by comfort class) and Can-BICS categorical metric were derived and mapped for all 56,589 DAs in Canada. The Can-BICS metrics were correlated with other national datasets (2016 Canadian Active Living Environments [Can-ALE] and 2016 Census journey-to-work data) to test for associations between Can-BICS and related measures. Additionally, city staff were engaged to provide feedback on metrics during the development phase.\u0000\u0000\u0000Results\u0000One-third (34%) of neighbourhoods in Canada have no cycling infrastructure. According to the categorical measure, 5% of all DAs were assigned as the highest category of Can-BICS (corresponding to 6% of the population) and were nearly all within metro areas. The Can-BICS continuous metric had low correlation with bike-to-work rates (R = 0.29) and was more strongly correlated with sustainable-transportation-to-work rates (R = 0.56) and the Can-ALE metrics (R=0.62). These correlations were variable across cities.\u0000\u0000\u0000Interpretation\u0000The Can-BICS metrics provide national research- and practice-ready measures of cycling infrastructure. The metrics complement existing measures of walking and transit environments (Can-ALE), collectively providing a cohesive set of active living measures. The datasets and code are publicly available, facilitating updates as new infrastructure is built.","PeriodicalId":49196,"journal":{"name":"Health Reports","volume":"33 10 1","pages":"3-13"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0,"publicationDate":"2022-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43157398","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
How sedentary are Canadian adults? It depends on the measure. 加拿大成年人有多久坐不动?这取决于衡量标准。
IF 5 2区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2022-10-19 DOI: 10.25318/82-003-x202201000002-eng
R. Colley, J. Lang, T. Saunders, K. C. Roberts, Gregory P Butler, Stephanie A. Prince
IntroductionThe new Canadian 24-Hour Movement Guidelines for Adults aged 18-64 years and Adults aged 65 years and older recommend that adults limit daily sedentary time to eight hours or less, including three hours or less of recreational screen time. The eight-hour recommendation was centred between the evidence from research using self-reported sitting time (threshold: seven hours or less per day) and accelerometer-measured sedentary time (threshold: nine hours or less per day). The purpose of this study is to compare the percentages of Canadians meeting three different sedentary thresholds (three hours or less per day of screen time, seven hours or less per day of self-reported sitting time and nine hours or less per day of accelerometer-measured sedentary time).MethodsThis analysis is based on 2,511 adults (aged 18 to 79 years) from Cycle 3 of the Canadian Health Measures Survey, in 2012 and 2013. Screen time and sitting time were assessed via self-report, and average daily sedentary time was assessed using a hip-worn Actical accelerometer.ResultsAdults self-reported an average daily screen time of 3.2 hours (95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.0 to 3.5) and an average daily sitting time of 5.7 hours (95% CI: 5.4 to 6.0). According to accelerometry data, adults accumulated an average of 9.8 hours per day (95% CI: 9.7 to 9.9) of sedentary time. Adherence varied, with 57.7% meeting the self-reported recreational screen time threshold of three hours or less per day, 71.7% meeting the self-reported sitting time threshold of seven hours or less per day and 26.5% meeting the accelerometer-measured sedentary time threshold of nine hours or less per day.InterpretationThe percentage of Canadian adults meeting the three different sedentary behaviour thresholds varied widely. The findings in this article highlight the difference in sedentary time between what Canadians report versus what is measured by an accelerometer.
新的加拿大18-64岁成年人和65岁及以上成年人24小时运动指南建议成年人将每天久坐的时间限制在8小时或以下,包括3小时或更少的娱乐屏幕时间。八小时建议的证据集中在使用自我报告的坐着时间(阈值:每天7小时或更少)和加速度计测量的久坐时间(阈值:每天9小时或更少)的研究证据之间。这项研究的目的是比较满足三个不同久坐阈值的加拿大人的百分比(每天看屏幕的时间不超过3小时,每天自我报告的坐着时间不超过7小时,每天加速度计测量的久坐时间不超过9小时)。方法本分析基于2012年和2013年加拿大健康措施调查第三周期的2511名成年人(18至79岁)。屏幕时间和久坐时间通过自我报告进行评估,平均每天久坐时间使用穿戴在臀部的实用加速度计进行评估。结果成年人自我报告的平均每天屏幕时间为3.2小时(95%可信区间[CI]: 3.0至3.5),平均每天坐着时间为5.7小时(95%可信区间[CI]: 5.4至6.0)。根据加速度计数据,成年人每天平均积累了9.8小时的久坐时间(95% CI: 9.7 - 9.9)。依从性各不相同,57.7%的人达到了自我报告的每天3小时或更少的娱乐屏幕时间阈值,71.7%的人达到了自我报告的每天7小时或更少的坐着时间阈值,26.5%的人达到了加速度计测量的每天9小时或更少的久坐时间阈值。符合三种不同久坐行为阈值的加拿大成年人的百分比差异很大。这篇文章的发现强调了加拿大人报告的与加速度计测量的久坐时间之间的差异。
{"title":"How sedentary are Canadian adults? It depends on the measure.","authors":"R. Colley, J. Lang, T. Saunders, K. C. Roberts, Gregory P Butler, Stephanie A. Prince","doi":"10.25318/82-003-x202201000002-eng","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.25318/82-003-x202201000002-eng","url":null,"abstract":"Introduction\u0000The new Canadian 24-Hour Movement Guidelines for Adults aged 18-64 years and Adults aged 65 years and older recommend that adults limit daily sedentary time to eight hours or less, including three hours or less of recreational screen time. The eight-hour recommendation was centred between the evidence from research using self-reported sitting time (threshold: seven hours or less per day) and accelerometer-measured sedentary time (threshold: nine hours or less per day). The purpose of this study is to compare the percentages of Canadians meeting three different sedentary thresholds (three hours or less per day of screen time, seven hours or less per day of self-reported sitting time and nine hours or less per day of accelerometer-measured sedentary time).\u0000\u0000\u0000Methods\u0000This analysis is based on 2,511 adults (aged 18 to 79 years) from Cycle 3 of the Canadian Health Measures Survey, in 2012 and 2013. Screen time and sitting time were assessed via self-report, and average daily sedentary time was assessed using a hip-worn Actical accelerometer.\u0000\u0000\u0000Results\u0000Adults self-reported an average daily screen time of 3.2 hours (95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.0 to 3.5) and an average daily sitting time of 5.7 hours (95% CI: 5.4 to 6.0). According to accelerometry data, adults accumulated an average of 9.8 hours per day (95% CI: 9.7 to 9.9) of sedentary time. Adherence varied, with 57.7% meeting the self-reported recreational screen time threshold of three hours or less per day, 71.7% meeting the self-reported sitting time threshold of seven hours or less per day and 26.5% meeting the accelerometer-measured sedentary time threshold of nine hours or less per day.\u0000\u0000\u0000Interpretation\u0000The percentage of Canadian adults meeting the three different sedentary behaviour thresholds varied widely. The findings in this article highlight the difference in sedentary time between what Canadians report versus what is measured by an accelerometer.","PeriodicalId":49196,"journal":{"name":"Health Reports","volume":"33 10 1","pages":"14-27"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0,"publicationDate":"2022-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47767520","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Compliance with precautions to reduce the spread of COVID-19 in Canada. 遵守预防措施以减少COVID-19在加拿大的传播。
IF 5 2区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2022-09-15 DOI: 10.25318/82-003-x202200900001-eng
Jonathan Cabot, Tracey Bushnik

Background: Throughout the COVID-19 pandemic, Canadian public health officials have mandated and recommended precautions to slow the spread of COVID-19. This study examined which population groups were less compliant with precautions, such as mask-wearing and self-isolating, and where they were located in Canada.

Data and methods: Results are from the Canadian COVID-19 Antibody and Health Survey, a national survey aimed at estimating how many Canadians who were older than one year and living in private households had antibodies in their blood against the SARS-CoV-2 virus. Questionnaire data were collected in the 10 provinces and 3 territorial capitals, from November 2020 to April 2021. Respondents were asked about compliance with precautions related to COVID-19. Weighted prevalences and logistic regression models were used to identify which population groups were less compliant with precautions to prevent the spread of COVID-19, and where they were located in Canada.

Results: Significant differences in compliance with precautions were found by sex, region, urban versus rural location, age, income, presence of chronic conditions, household size and work status. With covariate adjustment, Canadians who were less compliant with precautions were males, those living in the territorial capitals, those in rural areas, and people aged 34 and younger (compared with people aged 65 and older). Additional differences were found when analyzing compliance with consistently recommended precautions compared with those usually recommended.

Interpretation: As Canada continues to navigate the waves of the pandemic, and with the emergence of new variants, precautions are still being mandated or recommended in many jurisdictions and locations. Continuing to understand which population groups were less compliant in earlier waves and where they were located in Canada can be beneficial to ongoing and future public health efforts to slow the transmission of COVID-19.

背景:在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间,加拿大公共卫生官员已经授权并建议采取预防措施,以减缓COVID-19的传播。这项研究调查了哪些人群不太遵守预防措施,比如戴口罩和自我隔离,以及他们位于加拿大的哪个地方。数据和方法:结果来自加拿大COVID-19抗体和健康调查,这是一项全国性调查,旨在估计有多少年龄在一岁以上、住在私人家庭的加拿大人血液中含有针对SARS-CoV-2病毒的抗体。从2020年11月至2021年4月,在10个省和3个地区首府收集问卷数据。受访者被问及是否遵守与COVID-19相关的预防措施。使用加权患病率和逻辑回归模型来确定哪些人群不太遵守预防COVID-19传播的预防措施,以及他们在加拿大的位置。结果:性别、地区、城乡、年龄、收入、是否患有慢性病、家庭规模、工作状况等因素对预防措施依从性存在显著差异。通过协变量调整,不太遵守预防措施的加拿大人是男性、居住在各省首府的人、农村地区的人、34岁及以下的人(与65岁及以上的人相比)。当分析一致推荐的预防措施与通常推荐的预防措施的依从性时,发现了额外的差异。解读:随着加拿大继续应对大流行的浪潮,以及新变种的出现,许多司法管辖区和地区仍在强制要求或建议采取预防措施。继续了解哪些人群在早期的浪潮中不太遵守规定,以及他们在加拿大的位置,可能有助于当前和未来减缓COVID-19传播的公共卫生努力。
{"title":"Compliance with precautions to reduce the spread of COVID-19 in Canada.","authors":"Jonathan Cabot,&nbsp;Tracey Bushnik","doi":"10.25318/82-003-x202200900001-eng","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.25318/82-003-x202200900001-eng","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Throughout the COVID-19 pandemic, Canadian public health officials have mandated and recommended precautions to slow the spread of COVID-19. This study examined which population groups were less compliant with precautions, such as mask-wearing and self-isolating, and where they were located in Canada.</p><p><strong>Data and methods: </strong>Results are from the Canadian COVID-19 Antibody and Health Survey, a national survey aimed at estimating how many Canadians who were older than one year and living in private households had antibodies in their blood against the SARS-CoV-2 virus. Questionnaire data were collected in the 10 provinces and 3 territorial capitals, from November 2020 to April 2021. Respondents were asked about compliance with precautions related to COVID-19. Weighted prevalences and logistic regression models were used to identify which population groups were less compliant with precautions to prevent the spread of COVID-19, and where they were located in Canada.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significant differences in compliance with precautions were found by sex, region, urban versus rural location, age, income, presence of chronic conditions, household size and work status. With covariate adjustment, Canadians who were less compliant with precautions were males, those living in the territorial capitals, those in rural areas, and people aged 34 and younger (compared with people aged 65 and older). Additional differences were found when analyzing compliance with consistently recommended precautions compared with those usually recommended.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>As Canada continues to navigate the waves of the pandemic, and with the emergence of new variants, precautions are still being mandated or recommended in many jurisdictions and locations. Continuing to understand which population groups were less compliant in earlier waves and where they were located in Canada can be beneficial to ongoing and future public health efforts to slow the transmission of COVID-19.</p>","PeriodicalId":49196,"journal":{"name":"Health Reports","volume":"33 9","pages":"3-10"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0,"publicationDate":"2022-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"33493512","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
An analysis of cannabis home cultivation and associated risks in Canada, before and after legalization. 加拿大大麻合法化前后家庭种植及相关风险分析。
IF 5 2区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2022-09-15 DOI: 10.25318/82-003-x202200900003-eng
Nick Cristiano, Karen Pacheco, Elle Wadsworth, Christina Schell, Nayani Ramakrishnan, Elissa Faiazza, Elisabeth Beauchamp, Sarah Wood

Background: In 2018, Canada legalized the use and sale of non-medical cannabis, with most provinces also permitting home cultivation. To advance the knowledge of home cultivation patterns in Canada within the context of legalization, this study examines (1) the demographics and use patterns of cannabis home growers before and after legalization and (2) the relationship between home cultivation and cannabis-related risks, including workplace use and driving after cannabis use(DACU).

Data and methods: The study is based on seven waves of the National Cannabis Survey, dating from 2018 to 2019. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze home cultivation across several individual and sociodemographic characteristics pre- and post-legalization. Logistic regression was used to examine whether home cultivation is correlated to selected cannabis-related risks.

Results: The rate and demographics of home cultivation remained relatively unchanged post-legalization. Those most likely to cultivate cannabis post-legalization were male; 35 years and older; not single; married, common law, divorced, separated or widowed; lived in the Atlantic provinces; consumed cannabis medically or medically and non-medically on a daily or almost daily basis; had more than a high school diploma; and reported "smoking" as their primary consumption method. Home cultivation was correlated to workplace use but not to DACU.

Interpretation: The research provides early insights into home cultivation within a legalized framework. It also shows a relationship between home cultivation and certain cannabis-related risks (e.g., workplace use), suggesting a need for future research to determine whether tailored education and policy interventions are needed to target cannabis home growers.

背景:2018年,加拿大将非医用大麻的使用和销售合法化,大多数省份也允许家庭种植。为了提高对加拿大大麻合法化背景下家庭种植模式的认识,本研究考察了(1)大麻合法化前后家庭种植者的人口统计学和使用模式;(2)家庭种植与大麻相关风险的关系,包括工作场所使用和大麻使用后驾驶(DACU)。数据和方法:该研究基于2018年至2019年全国大麻调查的七波。描述性统计用于分析大麻合法化前后的几个个体和社会人口特征的家庭种植。采用Logistic回归检验家庭种植是否与选定的大麻相关风险相关。结果:大麻合法化后,家庭种植的比例和人口结构保持相对不变。大麻合法化后最有可能种植大麻的是男性;35岁及以上;不是单一;已婚、普通法、离婚、分居或丧偶;住在大西洋各省;每天或几乎每天以医疗或医疗和非医疗方式吸食大麻;高中以上学历;“吸烟”是他们的主要消费方式。家庭耕作与工作场所使用相关,但与DACU无关。解释:这项研究提供了在一个合法框架内家庭种植的早期见解。它还显示了家庭种植与某些大麻相关风险(例如工作场所使用)之间的关系,这表明需要进行未来的研究,以确定是否需要针对大麻家庭种植者进行量身定制的教育和政策干预。
{"title":"An analysis of cannabis home cultivation and associated risks in Canada, before and after legalization.","authors":"Nick Cristiano,&nbsp;Karen Pacheco,&nbsp;Elle Wadsworth,&nbsp;Christina Schell,&nbsp;Nayani Ramakrishnan,&nbsp;Elissa Faiazza,&nbsp;Elisabeth Beauchamp,&nbsp;Sarah Wood","doi":"10.25318/82-003-x202200900003-eng","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.25318/82-003-x202200900003-eng","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In 2018, Canada legalized the use and sale of non-medical cannabis, with most provinces also permitting home cultivation. To advance the knowledge of home cultivation patterns in Canada within the context of legalization, this study examines (1) the demographics and use patterns of cannabis home growers before and after legalization and (2) the relationship between home cultivation and cannabis-related risks, including workplace use and driving after cannabis use(DACU).</p><p><strong>Data and methods: </strong>The study is based on seven waves of the National Cannabis Survey, dating from 2018 to 2019. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze home cultivation across several individual and sociodemographic characteristics pre- and post-legalization. Logistic regression was used to examine whether home cultivation is correlated to selected cannabis-related risks.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The rate and demographics of home cultivation remained relatively unchanged post-legalization. Those most likely to cultivate cannabis post-legalization were male; 35 years and older; not single; married, common law, divorced, separated or widowed; lived in the Atlantic provinces; consumed cannabis medically or medically and non-medically on a daily or almost daily basis; had more than a high school diploma; and reported \"smoking\" as their primary consumption method. Home cultivation was correlated to workplace use but not to DACU.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>The research provides early insights into home cultivation within a legalized framework. It also shows a relationship between home cultivation and certain cannabis-related risks (e.g., workplace use), suggesting a need for future research to determine whether tailored education and policy interventions are needed to target cannabis home growers.</p>","PeriodicalId":49196,"journal":{"name":"Health Reports","volume":"33 9","pages":"21-31"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0,"publicationDate":"2022-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"33493514","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Linkage of the nationally representative Canadian Community Health Survey - Nutrition 2004 to routinely collected mortality records. 2004年具有全国代表性的加拿大社区健康调查-营养与常规收集的死亡率记录的联系。
IF 5 2区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2022-09-15 DOI: 10.25318/82-003-x202200900002-eng
Mahsa Jessri, Deirdre Hennessy, Anan Bader Eddeen, Carol Bennett, Didier Garriguet, Claudia Sanmartin, Douglas Manuel

Introduction: The Canadian Community Health Survey (CCHS) - Nutrition 2004 (n=35,107; interview dates from January 2004 to January 2005) linked to the Canadian Vital Statistics - Death Database (CVSD) (2011) represents a novel linkage of a population-based, nationally representative nutrition survey with routinely collected mortality records (including date and cause of death). The linkage was done through individual tax data in Canada, and contains longitudinal records for 29,897 Canadians aged 0 years and older-1,753 of whom died-in the 10 provinces of Canada. The median follow-up time was 7.49 years, with 102,953 person-years among males and 114,876 person-years among females (unweighted), and included a special sampling survey weight (for linked data) to account for those who did not agree to share and link their information. The CCHS - Nutrition 2004 linked to CVSD has been used to evaluate associations between lifestyle and sociodemographic characteristics and mortality. Using these data, statistical methods have been developed and tested to control random and systematic measurement errors when evaluating the relationship between different dietary exposures (evaluated using repeated 24-hour dietary recalls) and health outcomes. The linked data are available through Statistics Canada's Research Data Centres.

加拿大社区健康调查(CCHS)——营养,2004年(n= 35107;访谈日期为2004年1月至2005年1月),与加拿大生命统计-死亡数据库(CVSD)(2011年)相关联,代表了一项基于人群的、具有全国代表性的营养调查与常规收集的死亡率记录(包括死亡日期和原因)之间的新联系。这种联系是通过加拿大的个人税收数据完成的,包含了加拿大10个省29,897名年龄在0岁及以上的加拿大人的纵向记录,其中1,753人已经去世。中位随访时间为7.49年,其中男性102,953人年,女性114,876人年(未加权),并包括一个特殊的抽样调查权重(用于关联数据),以考虑那些不同意分享和链接他们的信息的人。与心血管疾病相关的CCHS - Nutrition 2004已被用于评估生活方式与社会人口特征和死亡率之间的关系。利用这些数据,已经开发和测试了统计方法,以控制评估不同饮食暴露(使用重复的24小时饮食回忆进行评估)与健康结果之间关系时的随机和系统测量误差。相关数据可通过加拿大统计局的研究数据中心获得。
{"title":"Linkage of the nationally representative Canadian Community Health Survey - Nutrition 2004 to routinely collected mortality records.","authors":"Mahsa Jessri,&nbsp;Deirdre Hennessy,&nbsp;Anan Bader Eddeen,&nbsp;Carol Bennett,&nbsp;Didier Garriguet,&nbsp;Claudia Sanmartin,&nbsp;Douglas Manuel","doi":"10.25318/82-003-x202200900002-eng","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.25318/82-003-x202200900002-eng","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The Canadian Community Health Survey (CCHS) - Nutrition 2004 (n=35,107; interview dates from January 2004 to January 2005) linked to the Canadian Vital Statistics - Death Database (CVSD) (2011) represents a novel linkage of a population-based, nationally representative nutrition survey with routinely collected mortality records (including date and cause of death). The linkage was done through individual tax data in Canada, and contains longitudinal records for 29,897 Canadians aged 0 years and older-1,753 of whom died-in the 10 provinces of Canada. The median follow-up time was 7.49 years, with 102,953 person-years among males and 114,876 person-years among females (unweighted), and included a special sampling survey weight (for linked data) to account for those who did not agree to share and link their information. The CCHS - Nutrition 2004 linked to CVSD has been used to evaluate associations between lifestyle and sociodemographic characteristics and mortality. Using these data, statistical methods have been developed and tested to control random and systematic measurement errors when evaluating the relationship between different dietary exposures (evaluated using repeated 24-hour dietary recalls) and health outcomes. The linked data are available through Statistics Canada's Research Data Centres.</p>","PeriodicalId":49196,"journal":{"name":"Health Reports","volume":"33 9","pages":"11-20"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0,"publicationDate":"2022-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"33493513","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Profiles of mental health and their association with negative impacts and suicidal ideation during the COVID-19 pandemic: A Canadian perspective. 新冠肺炎大流行期间的心理健康概况及其与负面影响和自杀念头的关联:加拿大视角。
IF 5 2区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2022-08-18 DOI: 10.25318/82-003-x202200800002-eng
Michelle D Guerrero, Joel D Barnes

Background: Mental health among Canadians has worsened since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic. The purpose of this study was to identify profiles of mental health difficulties and to quantify the relationships between mental health profiles, negative impacts related to the pandemic and suicidal ideation.

Data and methods: Participants were 22,721 adults (18 years and older) from the 2020 and 2021 Survey on COVID-19 and Mental Health. Latent profile analysis was used to identify patterns of anxiety, depression and psychological distress. The relationships between mental health profiles, negative impacts and suicidal ideation were examined using logistic regression models.

Results: Three mental health profiles were identified. Individuals were classified as having no mental health difficulties (Profile 1, 65.70%), low-to-moderate mental health difficulties (Profile 2, 25.52%) and severe mental health difficulties (Profile 3, 8.78%). Individuals in Profiles 2 and 3 were at greater odds than individuals in Profile 1 of experiencing emotional distress; the death of a family member, friend or colleague; difficulty in meeting financial obligations or essential needs; the loss of a job or income; feelings of loneliness or isolation; physical health problems; challenges in personal relationships with household members; and other impacts. Individuals in Profile 2 (4.27%, odds ratio (OR) = 24.30) and Profile 3 (19.09%, odds ratio (OR) = 115.75) were considerably more likely to have contemplated suicide since the onset of the pandemic compared with those in Profile 1 (0.16%).

Interpretation: Individuals who experienced high levels of anxiety, depression and psychological distress were most vulnerable to negative impacts related to the pandemic and suicidal ideation.

背景:自COVID-19大流行开始以来,加拿大人的心理健康状况恶化。本研究的目的是确定心理健康困难的概况,并量化心理健康概况、与大流行有关的负面影响和自杀意念之间的关系。数据和方法:参与者是2020年和2021年COVID-19和心理健康调查的22,721名成年人(18岁及以上)。潜在特征分析用于识别焦虑、抑郁和心理困扰的模式。采用logistic回归模型检验心理健康状况、消极影响和自杀意念之间的关系。结果:确定了三种心理健康状况。个体分为无心理健康困难(特征1,65.70%)、低至中度心理健康困难(特征2,25.52%)和严重心理健康困难(特征3,8.78%)。档案2和档案3中的个体比档案1中的个体经历情绪困扰的几率更大;家庭成员、朋友或同事去世;困难的:难以满足财政义务或基本需要的;失业:失去工作或收入;孤独:孤独或孤立的感觉;身体健康问题;与家庭成员的个人关系面临挑战;以及其他影响。与病例1中的个体(0.16%)相比,病例2中的个体(4.27%,优势比(OR) = 24.30)和病例3中的个体(19.09%,优势比(OR) = 115.75)在大流行开始以来更有可能考虑过自杀。解释:经历高度焦虑、抑郁和心理困扰的个体最容易受到与大流行和自杀意念相关的负面影响。
{"title":"Profiles of mental health and their association with negative impacts and suicidal ideation during the COVID-19 pandemic: A Canadian perspective.","authors":"Michelle D Guerrero,&nbsp;Joel D Barnes","doi":"10.25318/82-003-x202200800002-eng","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.25318/82-003-x202200800002-eng","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Mental health among Canadians has worsened since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic. The purpose of this study was to identify profiles of mental health difficulties and to quantify the relationships between mental health profiles, negative impacts related to the pandemic and suicidal ideation.</p><p><strong>Data and methods: </strong>Participants were 22,721 adults (18 years and older) from the 2020 and 2021 Survey on COVID-19 and Mental Health. Latent profile analysis was used to identify patterns of anxiety, depression and psychological distress. The relationships between mental health profiles, negative impacts and suicidal ideation were examined using logistic regression models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three mental health profiles were identified. Individuals were classified as having no mental health difficulties (Profile 1, 65.70%), low-to-moderate mental health difficulties (Profile 2, 25.52%) and severe mental health difficulties (Profile 3, 8.78%). Individuals in Profiles 2 and 3 were at greater odds than individuals in Profile 1 of experiencing emotional distress; the death of a family member, friend or colleague; difficulty in meeting financial obligations or essential needs; the loss of a job or income; feelings of loneliness or isolation; physical health problems; challenges in personal relationships with household members; and other impacts. Individuals in Profile 2 (4.27%, odds ratio (OR) = 24.30) and Profile 3 (19.09%, odds ratio (OR) = 115.75) were considerably more likely to have contemplated suicide since the onset of the pandemic compared with those in Profile 1 (0.16%).</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Individuals who experienced high levels of anxiety, depression and psychological distress were most vulnerable to negative impacts related to the pandemic and suicidal ideation.</p>","PeriodicalId":49196,"journal":{"name":"Health Reports","volume":"33 8","pages":"19-30"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0,"publicationDate":"2022-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"40721860","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
The influence of removing the 10-minute bout requirement on the demographic, behaviour and health profiles of Canadian adults who meet the physical activity recommendations. 取消10分钟运动要求对符合体力活动建议的加拿大成年人的人口统计、行为和健康概况的影响。
IF 5 2区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2022-08-18 DOI: 10.25318/82-003-x202200800001-eng
Stephanie A Prince, Karen C Roberts, Justin J Lang, Gregory P Butler, Rachel C Colley

Background: Recently, the Canadian 24-Hour Movement Guidelines for Adults were released, and included a revised physical activity (PA) recommendation. The recommendation of 150 minutes per week of moderate-to-vigorous intensity PA (MVPA) was revised, from requiring that MVPA be accrued in bouts of 10 minutes or more (bouted) to having no bout requirement (non-bouted). The objective of this study was to assess whether there were differences in sociodemographic, health and fitness characteristics of Canadians who met the bouted and non-bouted PA recommendations.

Data and methods: Using adult (aged 18 to 79 years) accelerometer data from three combined cycles of the nationally representative Canadian Health Measures Survey (N = 7,102), this study compared adherence to the bouted and non-bouted recommendations. Differences in sociodemographic, health and fitness measures were assessed using independent t-tests and chi-squares. Multivariate linear and logistic regressions controlling for age, sex, household education and smoking examined associations with health and fitness measures.

Results: More adults met the PA recommendation using the non-bouted versus bouted (45.3% vs. 18.5%) requirement. Characteristics of those who met the bouted and only the non-bouted recommendations were similar. Exceptions among those who met only the non-bouted recommendation compared with meeting the bouted recommendation included fewer adults aged 65 years and older; lower MVPA, recreation PA and transport PA; and higher sedentary time, light PA and grip strength.

Interpretation: Although the removal of the 10-minute bout requirement increased the proportion of Canadian adults who met the PA recommendation, there were no substantial differences in the sociodemographic and health characteristics of the populations captured by the bouted and non-bouted definitions. Results help to inform the transition in reporting for PA surveillance.

背景:最近,加拿大成人24小时运动指南发布,其中包括修订的身体活动(PA)建议。每周150分钟的中高强度PA (MVPA)建议被修改,从要求MVPA在10分钟或以上的回合中累积(回合)到没有回合要求(非回合)。本研究的目的是评估是否有社会人口学,健康和健身特征的加拿大人谁符合围围和非围围的PA建议的差异。数据和方法:本研究使用具有全国代表性的加拿大健康措施调查(N = 7,102)三个联合周期的成人(18至79岁)加速度计数据,比较了对有限制和无限制建议的依从性。采用独立t检验和卡方对社会人口学、健康和健身指标的差异进行评估。控制年龄、性别、家庭教育和吸烟的多变量线性和逻辑回归研究了与健康和健身措施的关系。结果:更多的成年人达到了PA推荐的要求,他们使用的是非围护组,而不是围护组(45.3%对18.5%)。那些符合有限制建议和只有非有限制建议的人的特征是相似的。在那些只符合非约束性建议的人中,与符合约束性建议的人相比,例外情况包括65岁及以上的成年人较少;较低的MVPA、康乐PA和交通PA;久坐时间,轻PA和握力。解释:虽然取消10分钟的回合要求增加了符合PA建议的加拿大成年人的比例,但根据回合和非回合定义捕获的人群的社会人口学和健康特征没有实质性差异。结果有助于为PA监测报告的转变提供信息。
{"title":"The influence of removing the 10-minute bout requirement on the demographic, behaviour and health profiles of Canadian adults who meet the physical activity recommendations.","authors":"Stephanie A Prince,&nbsp;Karen C Roberts,&nbsp;Justin J Lang,&nbsp;Gregory P Butler,&nbsp;Rachel C Colley","doi":"10.25318/82-003-x202200800001-eng","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.25318/82-003-x202200800001-eng","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Recently, the Canadian 24-Hour Movement Guidelines for Adults were released, and included a revised physical activity (PA) recommendation. The recommendation of 150 minutes per week of moderate-to-vigorous intensity PA (MVPA) was revised, from requiring that MVPA be accrued in bouts of 10 minutes or more (bouted) to having no bout requirement (non-bouted). The objective of this study was to assess whether there were differences in sociodemographic, health and fitness characteristics of Canadians who met the bouted and non-bouted PA recommendations.</p><p><strong>Data and methods: </strong>Using adult (aged 18 to 79 years) accelerometer data from three combined cycles of the nationally representative Canadian Health Measures Survey (N = 7,102), this study compared adherence to the bouted and non-bouted recommendations. Differences in sociodemographic, health and fitness measures were assessed using independent t-tests and chi-squares. Multivariate linear and logistic regressions controlling for age, sex, household education and smoking examined associations with health and fitness measures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>More adults met the PA recommendation using the non-bouted versus bouted (45.3% vs. 18.5%) requirement. Characteristics of those who met the bouted and only the non-bouted recommendations were similar. Exceptions among those who met only the non-bouted recommendation compared with meeting the bouted recommendation included fewer adults aged 65 years and older; lower MVPA, recreation PA and transport PA; and higher sedentary time, light PA and grip strength.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Although the removal of the 10-minute bout requirement increased the proportion of Canadian adults who met the PA recommendation, there were no substantial differences in the sociodemographic and health characteristics of the populations captured by the bouted and non-bouted definitions. Results help to inform the transition in reporting for PA surveillance.</p>","PeriodicalId":49196,"journal":{"name":"Health Reports","volume":"33 8","pages":"3-18"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0,"publicationDate":"2022-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"40721859","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Sex differences in suicide mortality in Newfoundland and Labrador: An observational study with medical examiner data from 1997 to 2016. 纽芬兰和拉布拉多自杀死亡率的性别差异:1997年至2016年医学检查员数据的观察性研究。
IF 5 2区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2022-08-18 DOI: 10.25318/82-003-x202200800003-eng
Margo M Wilson, Nathaniel J Pollock, Nicole D Power, Yordan Karaivanov, Shree Mulay, Charlene Reccord

Background: Globally, the suicide rate is two times higher for males than for females. Previous studies in Newfoundland and Labrador did not examine age-specific rates by sex. The objectives of this study were to determine suicide rates by sex and age group and to compare the demographic and clinical characteristics of males and females who died by suicide.

Data and methods: This observational study analyzed a routinely collected dataset based on all medical examiner-determined suicide deaths among people aged 10 years and older in Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada, between 1997 and 2016. Age-standardized and age-specific suicide rates and rate ratios were calculated based on the number of deaths during the period, and descriptive statistics were used to compare demographic and clinical characteristics between males and females.

Results: The age-standardized suicide rate was 4.6 times higher among males than females and was higher for males in most age groups. Rates were highest in the young adult age groups for males (20 to 24 years) and females (35 to 39 years). Males who died by suicide were more likely to be from a rural community and to have died by firearm; females were more likely to die by self-poisoning and to have had a mental illness or substance use history.

Interpretation: The results are broadly consistent with previous research, though this is the first study to report age-specific suicide rates among females across the life course in Newfoundland and Labrador. The results underscore the need to design public health and clinical interventions that account for sex differences in suicide risks.

背景:在全球范围内,男性的自杀率是女性的两倍。之前在纽芬兰和拉布拉多的研究没有按性别检查特定年龄的发病率。本研究的目的是确定按性别和年龄组划分的自杀率,并比较死于自杀的男性和女性的人口学和临床特征。数据和方法:本观察性研究分析了一个常规收集的数据集,该数据集基于1997年至2016年间加拿大纽芬兰和拉布拉多省10岁及以上人群中所有体检医师确定的自杀死亡。根据该期间的死亡人数计算年龄标准化和特定年龄的自杀率和比率,并使用描述性统计来比较男性和女性之间的人口统计学和临床特征。结果:男性的年龄标准化自杀率是女性的4.6倍,在大多数年龄组中男性都高于女性。发病率最高的是男性(20至24岁)和女性(35至39岁)的年轻成人年龄组。死于自杀的男性更有可能来自农村社区,死于枪支;女性更有可能死于自我中毒,并有精神疾病或药物使用史。解释:研究结果与之前的研究大体一致,尽管这是第一个报告纽芬兰和拉布拉多女性在整个生命过程中特定年龄的自杀率的研究。研究结果强调,需要设计公共卫生和临床干预措施,以解释自杀风险的性别差异。
{"title":"Sex differences in suicide mortality in Newfoundland and Labrador: An observational study with medical examiner data from 1997 to 2016.","authors":"Margo M Wilson,&nbsp;Nathaniel J Pollock,&nbsp;Nicole D Power,&nbsp;Yordan Karaivanov,&nbsp;Shree Mulay,&nbsp;Charlene Reccord","doi":"10.25318/82-003-x202200800003-eng","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.25318/82-003-x202200800003-eng","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Globally, the suicide rate is two times higher for males than for females. Previous studies in Newfoundland and Labrador did not examine age-specific rates by sex. The objectives of this study were to determine suicide rates by sex and age group and to compare the demographic and clinical characteristics of males and females who died by suicide.</p><p><strong>Data and methods: </strong>This observational study analyzed a routinely collected dataset based on all medical examiner-determined suicide deaths among people aged 10 years and older in Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada, between 1997 and 2016. Age-standardized and age-specific suicide rates and rate ratios were calculated based on the number of deaths during the period, and descriptive statistics were used to compare demographic and clinical characteristics between males and females.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The age-standardized suicide rate was 4.6 times higher among males than females and was higher for males in most age groups. Rates were highest in the young adult age groups for males (20 to 24 years) and females (35 to 39 years). Males who died by suicide were more likely to be from a rural community and to have died by firearm; females were more likely to die by self-poisoning and to have had a mental illness or substance use history.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>The results are broadly consistent with previous research, though this is the first study to report age-specific suicide rates among females across the life course in Newfoundland and Labrador. The results underscore the need to design public health and clinical interventions that account for sex differences in suicide risks.</p>","PeriodicalId":49196,"journal":{"name":"Health Reports","volume":"33 8","pages":"31-38"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0,"publicationDate":"2022-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"40721861","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Health Reports
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1