Drugs in Research & Development最新文献

Background and objectives: Esmethadone (dextromethadone; d-methadone; S-methadone (+)-methadone; REL-1017) is a low potency N-methyl-_D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor channel blocker that showed a rapid and sustained adjunctive antidepressant effects in patients with major depressive disorder with inadequate response to ongoing serotonergic antidepressant treatment. Previous studies indicated that esmethadone is partially excreted by the kidney (53.9% of the dose) and by the liver (39.1% of the dose).

Methods: Here we studied the pharmacokinetics and safety of esmethadone after a single oral dose of 25 mg in subjects with different stages of kidney and liver impairment.

Results: In subjects with a mild and moderate decrease in glomerular fraction rate (GFR), esmethadone C_max and AUC_0-inf values did not differ compared with healthy subjects. In patients with severe renal impairment, the ratios of C_max and AUC_0-inf values compared with healthy subjects were above 100% (138.22-176.85%) and, while modest, these increases reached statistical significance. In subjects with end stage renal disease (ESRD) undergoing intermittent hemodialysis (IHD), C_max and AUC_0-inf values were not statistically different compared with healthy subjects. IHD did not modified plasma total esmethadone concentrations in blood exiting versus entering the dialyzer. Dose adjustment is not warranted in subjects with mild-to-moderate impaired renal function. Dose reduction may be considered for select patients with severe renal disfunction. In subjects with mild-or-moderate hepatic impairment, C_max and AUC_0-inf were approximately 20-30% lower compared with healthy controls. The drug free fraction increased with the severity of hepatic impairment, from 5.4% in healthy controls to 8.3% in subjects with moderate hepatic impairment.

Conclusion: Mild and moderate hepatic impairment has a minimal to modest impact on exposure to total or unbound esmethadone and dose adjustments are not warranted in subjects with mild and moderate hepatic impairment. Administration of esmethadone was well tolerated in healthy adult subjects, in subjects with mild or moderate hepatic impairment, and in subjects with mild moderate or severe renal impairment, including patients with ESRF undergoing dialysis.

Background and objective: Cancer is a deadly disease with high mortality rates in developing countries. A recent preclinical study found promising results in treating hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) by combining acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) and ascorbate (AS), which might offer a safer alternative to expensive clinical chemotherapeutics; however, the impact of this combination on other tumors remains unexplored. Therefore, this study aims to investigate the effectiveness of combining ASA and AS in treating Ehrlich solid tumors.

Methods: Eighty female Swiss albino mice were divided into eight groups (10 mice/group): four healthy groups (healthy, AS, ASA, and AS+ASA) and four groups with carcinoma (Ehrlich ascites carcinoma [EAC], EAC+AS, EAC+ASA, and EAC+AS+ASA). AS was injected intraperitoneally (4 g/kg) daily for 10 days, whereas ASA was ingested orally at 60 mg/kg/day for 10 days. Carcinoma was induced by subcutaneous injection of 1×10⁶ EAC cells/mouse once. Treatment of carcinoma started after 10 days of tumor inoculation. Blood, livers, and tumors were obtained, and tumor weights, volumes, and levels of hemoglobin, aminotransferases, albumin, bilirubin, urea, creatinine, lipid profile, malondialdehyde, nitric oxide, glutathione, catalase, total antioxidant capacity, lactate dehydrogenase, and creatine kinase were estimated. The percentage increase in lifespan was also assessed.

Results: Tumor treatment alleviated tumor burden. Tumor size was reduced, lifespan increased, organs (liver, kidney, and heart) functions adjusted, hemoglobin, lipid profile improved, and oxidative stress decreased. Combining ASA with AS showed more effective antitumor effects than only ASA or AS alone.

Conclusion: After more validation research, combining ASA with AS may provide benefit in cancer treatment.

Background and objective: Trichuriasis caused by the human whipworm Trichuris trichiura poses a significant public health concern. Albendazole-ivermectin co-medication is currently the most effective treatment. Studies conducted in Tanzania and Côte d'Ivoire unveiled differences in efficacy for albendazole-ivermectin combination therapy in both countries. A pharmacometrics approach was used to assess co-medication and study population effects on the pharmacokinetics of the two main metabolites of albendazole. An exploratory exposure-efficacy analysis was also carried out to investigate relationships between exposure measures and the egg reduction rate.

Methods: Pharmacokinetic data from studies in Tanzania and Côte d'Ivoire in adolescents (aged 12-19 years) were included in the pharmacometric analysis. Participants received a single dose of either albendazole 400 mg alone or in combination with ivermectin 200 µg/kg. A pharmacometric analysis was performed to investigate the potential effects of the study population and co-administered ivermectin on the apparent clearance of the metabolites of albendazole. Non-linear mixed-effects modeling was conducted with MonolixSuite 2023R1. The pharmacokinetic exposure measures derived from simulations with individual model parameters were used in the exploratory-exposure response analysis.

Results: Pharmacokinetic profiles were best described by a two-compartment model for albendazole sulfoxide and a one-compartment model for albendazole sulfone, with a transit compartment and linear elimination. While no co-medication effect was found, apparent clearance of albendazole sulfoxide (albendazole sulfone) in the Tanzanian study population was 75% (46%) higher than that in the Côte d'Ivoire study population. Exposure-efficacy response analyses indicated that peak concentration and the time-above-exposure threshold were associated with the egg reduction rate.

Conclusions: Study population but not co-administered ivermectin showed an effect on apparent clearance of albendazole sulfoxide and albendazole sulfone. Polymorphisms in drug-metabolizing enzymes and host-parasite interaction may explain this result. Difference in drug exposure did not explain the disparate efficacy responses in Tanzania and Côte d'Ivoire. Peak concentration and time-above-threshold were exposure measures associated with the egg reduction rate. Further studies evaluating genetic and resistance patterns in various regions in Africa are warranted.

Background: Pegfilgrastim-cbqv/CHS-1701 (UDENYCA^®) (hereafter referred to as pegfilgrastim-cbqv) was approved in 2018 by the US Food and Drug Administration as a biosimilar for pegfilgrastim (Neulasta^®) (hereafter referred to as pegfilgrastim). Both pegfilgrastim-cbqv and pegfilgrastim are conjugates of recombinant human granulocyte colony stimulating factor (r-metHuG-CSF) with a 20 kDa polyethylene glycol (PEG) indicated to decrease the incidence of infection, as manifested by febrile neutropenia, in patients receiving myelosuppressive anticancer drugs. The demonstration of analytical similarity for PEG-protein conjugates presents unique challenges since both the protein and PEG attributes must be characterized.

Objective: The current study demonstrates the analytical similarity of pegfilgrastim-cbqv and the reference product, pegfilgrastim. In addition to the physicochemical and functional characterization of the protein, the study assessed attributes specific to PEGylation including PEG size and polydispersity, site of attachment, linker composition, and PEGylation process-related variants.

Methods: The structural, functional, and stability attributes of pegfilgrastim-cbqv and pegfilgrastim were compared using state-of-the-art analytical methods. For the protein, the primary structure, disulfide structure, and secondary and tertiary structures were assessed using traditional protein characterization techniques such as mass spectrometry (MS), circular dichroism (CD), intrinsic fluorescence, and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), as well as more advanced techniques such as two-dimensional (2D) nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) and hydrogen deuterium exchange (HDX). For the PEG moiety, the site of attachment, occupancy, linker composition, size and polydispersity were compared using mass spectrometry (both intact and after endoprotease digestion), multiangle light scattering detection (MALS), and Edman degradation. Purity assessments included the assessment of both protein variants and PEGylation variants using chromatographic and electrophoretic analytical separation techniques. The functional similarity between pegfilgrastim-cbqv and pegfilgrastim was compared using both a cell-based bioassay and surface plasmon resonance (SPR). The degradation rates and stability profiles were compared under accelerated and stressed conditions.

Results: Biosimilarity was demonstrated by a thorough assessment of physiochemical and functional attributes, as well as comparative stability, of pegfilgrastim-cbqv relative to pegfilgrastim. These studies demonstrated identical primary structure and disulfide structure, highly similar secondary and tertiary structure, as well as functional similarity. The impurity profile of pegfilgrastim-cbqv was comparable to that of pegfilgrastim with only minor differences in PEGylation variants and a slight offset i

Background and objective: A prospective, postmarketing observational study was conducted to evaluate the safety and efficacy of lemborexant (LEM) tablets in daily clinical practice in Japan. No other studies of a similar size have been conducted since the marketing approval of LEM, making this the first report of its kind.

Methods: Insomnia patients (n = 550) administered LEM (5-10 mg daily) for the first time were enrolled. Adverse events were collected for target events (somnolence, parasomnia, narcolepsy and associated conditions, suicidal ideation and suicidal behavior). Overall improvement of insomnia symptoms was assessed by the investigator based on the patient's complaint. Subjective sleep onset latency (sSOL) and subjective total sleep time (sTST) were investigated as sleep parameters.

Results: A case report form was obtained from 539 patients. The incidence of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) was 7.65% for somnolence, 1.76% for nightmares, 0.59% for abnormal dreams, and 0.20% for sleep paralysis. No serious ADRs or ADRs related to suicidal ideation or suicidal behavior were observed. The efficacy rate at the final evaluation was 80.83%. Decreased sSOL and increased sTST were observed as assessed starting from Week 8 of treatment.

Conclusion: Based on the results of this study, the safety result was consistent with the safety profile described in the current package insert. Efficacy results also indicated that LEM is clinically useful.

Background: Vupanorsen is a GalNAc₃-conjugated antisense oligonucleotide targeting angiopoietin-like 3 (ANGPTL3) mRNA shown to reduce atherogenic lipoproteins in individuals with dyslipidemia.

Objectives: The aim of this study was to satisfy Chinese regulatory requirements and support ethnic sensitivity assessment by evaluating pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), and safety of vupanorsen in healthy Chinese adults with elevated triglycerides (TG).

Methods: In this phase I, parallel-cohort, open-label study, 18 Chinese adults with elevated fasting TG (≥ 90 mg/dL) were randomized 1:1 to receive a single subcutaneous dose of vupanorsen 80 mg or 160 mg. PK parameters, PD markers (including ANGPTL3, TG, non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol [non-HDL-C]), and safety were assessed.

Results: Absorption of vupanorsen was rapid (median time to maximum concentration [T_max]: 2.0 h for both doses), followed by a multiphasic decline (mean terminal half-life 475.9 [80 mg] and 465.2 h [160 mg]). Exposure (area under curve [AUC] and maximum plasma concentration [C_max]) generally increased in a greater than dose-proportional manner from 80 mg to 160 mg. Time-dependent reductions in ANGPTL3 and lipid parameters were observed. Mean percentage change from baseline for the 80-mg and 160-mg doses, respectively, were - 59.7% and - 69.5% for ANGPTL3, - 41.9% and - 52.5% for TG, and - 23.2% and - 25.4% for non-HDL-C. No serious or severe adverse events (AEs), deaths, or discontinuations due to AEs were reported. Three participants experienced treatment-related AEs; all were mild and resolved by end of study.

Conclusions: This study provided the first clinical vupanorsen data in China. In Chinese participants with elevated TG, PK and PD parameters were consistent with those reported previously in non-Chinese participants, including in Japanese individuals. No safety concerns were noted.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04916795.

Background and objective: This study aimed to assess and compare the pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability of a fixed-dose combination product (FDCP) comprising four different drugs (two antihypertensive drugs, amlodipine and losartan, and two lipid-lowering agents, ezetimibe and rosuvastatin) with their separate tablets.

Methods: A total of 60 participants were enrolled in this open-label, randomized, single-dose crossover study. Each participant received a single dose of FDCP and individual tablets during each period, with a 14-day washout period between the periods. The pharmacokinetic parameters of amlodipine, losartan, EXP3174 (an active metabolite of losartan), rosuvastatin, free ezetimibe, and total ezetimibe were evaluated and compared.

Results: The pharmacokinetic profiles of amlodipine, losartan, rosuvastatin, and ezetimibe after administration of the individual products were similar to those of FDCP. The geometric mean ratios and 90% confidence intervals for maximum concentration (C_max) and area under the curve (AUC) of FDCP to individual tablets were within 0.8-1.25 for all six analytes. No clinically relevant changes were observed in the vital signs or physical, biochemical, hematological, electrocardiographic, or urinalysis findings during the study, and no serious adverse events were reported.

Conclusion: This study demonstrated that a newly developed FDCP containing amlodipine, losartan, ezetimibe, and rosuvastatin exhibited pharmacokinetic equivalence with the individual products and met the regulatory criteria. Both formulations were well tolerated.

Clinical trial registration: This trial (NCT04322266) was retrospectively registered on 9 September 2019.

Background and objective: Venlafaxine hydrochloride extended-release (ER) capsules are commonly used to treat depression and anxiety disorders. Evaluation of the bioequivalence of generic formulations with reference products is essential to ensure therapeutic equivalence. The objective of this study was to evaluate the bioequivalence, safety, and tolerability of Chinese-manufactured venlafaxine hydrochloride extended-release capsules compared with USA-manufactured EFFEXOR^® XR in healthy Chinese volunteers under fed conditions.

Methods: A randomized, open-label, single-dose, crossover study was conducted. Subjects were randomly assigned to receive the test formulation (one 150-mg ER capsule manufactured in China) or the reference formulation (one 150-mg ER capsule manufactured in the USA). The bioequivalence of the two drugs was assessed using the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to the last sampling time (AUC_0-t) and the maximum observed concentration (C_max).

Results: A total of 28 subjects were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive a single dose of either the test or reference capsule. All the subjects completed the study and were included in the pharmacokinetic (PK) and safety analyses. The mean AUC_0-t and C_max of venlafaxine and its active metabolite O-desmethylvenlafaxine were comparable between the test and reference products with both parameters close to 100% and the corresponding 90% confidence intervals within the specified 80-125% bioequivalence boundary. Safety was also assessed between the two products and all adverse events (AEs) in this study were mild in severity.

Conclusions: Both the test and reference venlafaxine hydrochloride ER capsules were bioequivalent and showed a similar safety and tolerability profile in the population studied.

Clinical trials registration: This study was registered at the Drug Clinical Trial Registration and Information Publicity Platform ( http://www.chinadrugtrials.org.cn/index.html ) with registration number CTR20211243, date: June 1, 2021.