Drugs in Research & Development最新文献

Background and objective: Azithromycin is the first azalide antibiotic that is related to the macrolide family of antibiotics. Bioequivalence studies in China are initiated by the National Medical Products Administration (NMPA), which supports a generic consistency evaluation program for ensuring that generic products manufactured in China meet the required standards and provide equivalent therapeutic effects to their reference products. This study aimed to assess the bioequivalence of two azithromycin tablets under both fasting and fed conditions in healthy Chinese volunteers.

Methods: This was a single-center, open-label, single-dose, randomized, three-way crossover trial with two independent groups (fasting group and fed group). A total of 72 healthy Chinese subjects (36 subjects in the fasting state and 36 subjects in the fed state) were enrolled and randomized to treatment. Blood samples were collected from 0 to 120 h after a single oral dose of a 250-mg generic azithromycin tablet (test, T) or branded azithromycin tablet (reference, R). The plasma concentrations of azithromycin were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC‒MS/MS). A non-compartmental analysis method was used to estimate the pharmacokinetic parameters. Adverse events were documented.

Results: In a fasting state, the bioequivalence of maximum plasma concentration (C_max) was evaluated using the reference-scaled average bioequivalence (RSABE) approach (within-subject standard deviation, S_WR > 0.294), and the bioequivalence of area under the concentration-time curve from time 0 to the time of the last measurable plasma concentration (AUC_0-t) and area under the concentration-time curve from time 0 extrapolated to infinity (AUC_0-∞) were evaluated by the average bioequivalence (ABE) method (S_WR <  0.294). The geometric mean ratio (GMR) of T/R for C_max was 106.49%, while the 95% upper confidence bound was <  0. The GMRs of AUC_0-t and AUC_0-∞ were 103.34% and 101.28%, and the 90% confidence intervals (CIs) of the test/reference were 95.90-111.35%/94.85-108.15%, respectively. In the fed state, the RSABE approach was applied to estimate the bioequivalence of C_max (S_WR >0.294), and the ABE approach was applied to estimate the bioequivalence of AUC_0-t and AUC_0-∞ (S_WR <  0.294). The GMR for C_max was 99.80%, while the 95% upper confidence bound value was <  0. The GMRs of AUC_0-t and AUC_0-∞ were 97.07% and 98.15%, and the 90% CIs of the T/R were 90.02-104.68% and 90.66-106.25%, respectively. All adverse events were mild and transient.

Conclusions: The trial indicated that the test and the reference azithromycin tablets were bioequivalent and well tolerated in healthy Chinese volunteers und

Background and objectives: New acute pain medications are needed that provide effective analgesia while minimizing side effects and opioid exposure. Clinical trials of co-crystal of tramadol-celecoxib (CTC) have demonstrated an improved benefit/risk profile versus tramadol or celecoxib alone. We pooled data from two phase 3 clinical trials to evaluate the efficacy of CTC 200 mg twice daily (BID) in acute moderate-to-severe pain.

Methods: Efficacy data were pooled from STARDOM1 [acute pain following oral surgery (NCT02982161)] and ESTEVE-SUSA-301 [acute pain following bunionectomy (NCT03108482)]. The primary efficacy outcome was sum of pain intensity difference from 0 to 48 h (SPID_0-48).

Results: A total of 344 patients received CTC 200 mg BID, 342 received tramadol 50 or 100 mg four times a day, 181 received celecoxib 100 mg BID, and 172 received placebo. The least-squares mean difference in SPID_0-48 was -21.8 (p = 0.002) for CTC versus tramadol and -72.8 (p < 0.001) for CTC versus placebo. A similar pattern of SPID_0-48 was observed with CTC versus comparator whether patients had moderate or severe pain at baseline. Reduction in pain intensity was faster and reached mild intensity earlier with CTC versus comparators. Patients were significantly (p ≤ 0.005) less likely to receive rescue medication within 4 or 48 h with CTC compared with tramadol or placebo.

Conclusions: This pooled analysis reinforces the efficacy profile of CTC versus tramadol and, given that CTC permits lower daily tramadol dosing and thereby reduces unnecessary opioid use, this highlights its improved benefit/risk profile and its potential for the management of moderate-to-severe pain.

Background and objectives: Tolebrutinib is a covalent BTK inhibitor designed and selected for potency and CNS exposure to optimize impact on BTK-dependent signaling in CNS-resident cells. We applied a translational approach to evaluate three BTK inhibitors in Phase 3 clinical development in MS with respect to their relative potency to block BTK-dependent signaling and exposure in the CNS METHODS: We used in vitro kinase and cellular activation assays, alongside pharmacokinetic sampling of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) in the non-human primate cynomolgus to estimate the ability of these candidates (evobrutinib, fenebrutinib, and tolebrutinib) to block BTK-dependent signaling inside the CNS.

Results: In vitro kinase assays demonstrated that tolebrutinib reacted with BTK 65-times faster than evobrutinib, while fenebrutinib, a classical reversible antagonist with a K_i value of 4.7 nM and slow off-rate (1.54 x 10^-5 s^-1), also had an association rate 1760-fold slower (0.00245 μM^-1 * s^-1). Estimates of cellular potency were largely consistent with the in vitro kinase assays, with an estimated IC₅₀ of 0.7 nM for tolebrutinib against 33.5 nM for evobrutinib and 2.9 nM for fenebrutinib. We then observed that evobrutinib, fenebrutinib, and tolebrutinib achieved similar levels of exposure in non-human primate CSF after oral doses of 10 mg/kg. However, tolebrutinib CSF exposure (4.8 ng/mL) (k_p,uu CSF=0.40) exceeded the IC90 (the estimated concentration inhibiting 90% of kinase activity) value, while evobrutinib (3.2 ng/mL) (k_p,uu CSF=0.13) and fenebrutinib (12.9 ng/mL) (kp,uu CSF=0.15) failed to reach the estimated IC₉₀ values.

Conclusions: Tolebrutinib was the only candidate of the three that attained relevant CSF exposure in non-human primates.

Background and objectives: We determined normalization rates for hemoglobin, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), and fatigue in patients with paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH) treated with pegcetacoplan (PEG) in the PEGASUS (NCT03500549) and PRINCE (NCT04085601) phase III trials.

Methods: Enrolled patients had PNH and hemoglobin < 10.5 g/dL despite ≥ 3 months of eculizumab (ECU) [PEGASUS], or were complement component 5 (C5) inhibitor-naive, receiving supportive care only, with hemoglobin less than the lower limits of normal (LLN) [PRINCE]. Hematologic and fatigue normalization endpoints were hemoglobin greater than or equal to the LLN (females: 12 g/dL; males: 13.6 g/dL) in the absence of transfusion; LDH ≤226 U/L in the absence of transfusion; and Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT)-Fatigue ≥ 43.6, the general population norm. Safety was assessed by investigators using standardized terms and definitions for seriousness and severity.

Results: Hemoglobin normalization occurred in 34.1% (14/41) of PEG-treated patients at Week 16 (randomized controlled period) in PEGASUS (vs. 0% [0/39] of ECU-treated patients) and in 45.7% (16/35) of PEG-treated patients at Week 26 in PRINCE (vs. 0% [0/18] of supportive care-treated patients). At Week 48 (open-label period) in PEGASUS, 24.4% of PEG-treated patients (PEG-to-PEG) and 30.8% of patients treated with ECU through Week 16 who switched to PEG through Week 48 (ECU-to-PEG) had hemoglobin normalization. Rates of LDH normalization in PEGASUS were 70.7% (PEG-treated patients) and 15.4% (ECU-treated patients) at Week 16, and 56.1% (PEG-to-PEG) and 51.3% (ECU-to-PEG) at Week 48. In PRINCE, 67.5% of PEG-treated patients at Week 26 had normalized LDH concentrations. Rates of FACIT-Fatigue score normalization in PEGASUS were 48.8% and 10.3% in PEG- and ECU-treated patients, respectively, at Week 16, and 34.1% and 51.3% in PEG-to-PEG- and ECU-to-PEG-treated patients, respectively, at Week 48. In PRINCE, 68.6% of PEG-treated patients and 11.1% of supportive care patients had FACIT-Fatigue score normalization at Week 26. PEG was safe and well tolerated. Injection site reactions, mostly mild, were the most common adverse event of special interest in PEG-treated patients in the PEGASUS randomized controlled period (36.6%) and in PRINCE (30.4%).

Conclusion: PEG is superior to ECU and supportive care in hemoglobin, LDH, and FACIT-Fatigue score normalization for patients with PNH and persistent anemia despite ≥3 months of treatment with ECU, and in C5 inhibitor-naive patients.

Clinical trial registration: The PEGASUS trial (NCT03500549) was registered on 18 August 2018, and the PRINCE trial (NCT04085601) was registered on 11 September 2019.

Introduction: Noscapine is a commonly used cough suppressant, with ongoing research on its anti-inflammatory and anti-tumor properties. The drug has a pronounced pharmacokinetic variability.

Objective: This evaluation aims to describe the pharmacokinetics of noscapine using a semi-mechanistic population pharmacokinetic model and to identify covariates that could explain inter-individual pharmacokinetic variability.

Methods: Forty-eight healthy volunteers (30 men and 18 women, mean age 33 years) were enrolled in a randomized, two-period, two-stage, crossover bioequivalence study of noscapine in two different liquid formulations. Noscapine plasma concentrations following oral administration of noscapine 50 mg were evaluated by a non-compartmental analysis and by a population pharmacokinetic model separately.

Results: Compared to the reference formulation, the test formulation exhibited ratios (with 94.12% confidence intervals) of 0.784 (0.662-0.929) and 0.827 (0.762-0.925) for peak plasma concentrations and area under the plasma concentration-time curve, respectively. Significant differences in p values (< 0.01) were both observed when comparing peak plasma concentrations and area under the plasma concentration-time curve between CYP2C9 genotype-predicted phenotypes. A three-compartmental model with zero-order absorption and first-order elimination process best described the plasma data. The introduction of a liver compartment was able to describe the profound first-pass effect of noscapine. Total body weight and the CYP2C9 genotype-predicted phenotype were both identified as significant covariates on apparent clearance, which was estimated as 958 ± 548 L/h for extensive metabolizers (CYP2C9*1/*1 and *1/*9), 531 ± 304 L/h for intermediate metabolizers with an activity score of 1.5 (CYP2C9*1/*2), and 343 ± 197 L/h for poor metabolizers and intermediate metabolizers with an activity score of 1.0 (CYP2C9*1/*3, *2/*3, and*3/*3).

Conclusion: The current work is expected to facilitate the future pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic development of noscapine. This study was registered prior to starting at "Deutsches Register Klinischer Studien" under registration no. DRKS00017760.

Background and objective: Atorvastatin is a drug widely used to prevent cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases. Current observational studies suggest that atorvastatin may be associated with cognitive dysfunction (especially memory loss). However, some studies have suggested that dyslipidemia may be an important factor in cognitive dysfunction. The purpose of this study was to perform a pharmacovigilance analysis using real-world data from the US Food and Drug Administration's Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) to assess whether memory loss is an adverse effect of atorvastatin and to further clarify its causality through Mendelian randomization (MR).

Methods: We extracted real-world data from the FAERS database (Quarter 1 2004 to Quarter 1 2023). Disproportionality analysis methods and measures of association such as the reporting odds ratio (OR), proportional reporting ratio, Bayesian confidence interval progressive neural network, and polynomial Gamma Poisson distribution reduction were used to assess whether memory loss was an adverse effect of atorvastatin. In addition, we used MR to evaluate causality in depth.

Results: In the pharmacovigilance analysis of atorvastatin, we extracted four datasets of clinical symptoms associated with memory loss from the FAERS database [Amnesia (n = 1196), Memory impairment (n = 840), Transient global amnesia (n = 38), and Retrograde amnesia (n = 9)]. The reporting OR, proportional reporting ratio, Bayesian confidence interval progressive neural network, and Gamma Poisson distribution reduction all showed positive results for amnesia, transient global amnesia, and retrograde amnesia, while the reporting OR and Bayesian confidence interval progressive neural network also showed positive results for memory disorders. Thus, memory loss was a frequent side effect of atorvastatin. The MR analyses were used to further evaluate the association between statins and memory loss. The results of the MR analysis (statins and memory loss) are as follows: Ivw (mre) (β = 0.11 [OR = 1.11], P = 0.01 < 0.05) and the OR and β directions of MR-Egger and weighted mode were the same. The results of the MR analysis (statins and mitochondrial DNA copy number) are as follows: Ivw(mre) (β = -0.03 [OR = 0.96], P < 0.01) and the OR and β direction of MR-Egger and weighted mode are the same. The results of the MR analysis (DNA copy number and memory loss) are as follows: Ivw(β = - 0.06 [OR = 0.94], P = 0.04 < 0.05) and the OR and β direction of MR-Egger and weighted mode were the same. The pleiotropy test did not find horizontal diversity in our results.

Conclusions: This study suggests that memory loss is a notable adverse event associated with atorvastatin and provides evidence indicating a potential causal relationship between atorvastatin and memory loss. We also found that statins may further affect memory by affecting mitochondrial func

Melanoma is an aggressive, rapidly developing form of skin cancer that affects about 22 per 100,000 individuals. Treatment options for melanoma patients are limited and typically involve surgical excision of moles and chemotherapy. Survival has been improved in recent years through targeted small molecule inhibitors and antibody-based immunotherapies. However, the long-term side effects that arise from taking chemotherapies can negatively impact the lives of patients because they lack specificity and impact healthy cells along with the cancer cells. Antibody-drug conjugates are a promising new class of drugs for the treatment of melanoma. This review focuses on the development of antibody-drug conjugates for melanoma and discusses the existing clinical trials of antibody-drug conjugates and their use as a melanoma treatment. So far, the antibody-drug conjugates have struggled from efficacy problems, with modest effects at best, leading many to be discontinued for melanoma. At the same time, conjugates such as AMT-253, targeting melanoma cell adhesion molecule, and mecbotamab vedotin  targeting AXL receptor tyrosine kinase, are among the most exciting for melanoma treatment in the future.

Background and objective: PD-1 inhibitors have revolutionized cancer therapies and are being used to treat an expanding array of cancers. To best serve patients, clinicians should be familiar with the spectrum of skin manifestations associated with PD-1 inhibitor therapy. Here, we report a unique case of hypertrophic lichen planus (HLP) in a 64-year-old man treated with pembrolizumab; the presentation initially suggested a squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) morphology, then evolved into a morphology more typical of hypertrophic lichen planus. This case underscores the need for caution in diagnosing eruptive SCCs associated with PD-1 inhibitor therapy. In such instances, maintaining a high suspicion for lichenoid reactions as sequelae of PD-1 inhibitor treatment and starting an empiric trial of therapy for lichenoid dermatitis may be warranted to ensure timely management of lesions.

Methods: We describe a case of hypertrophic lichen planus mimicking squamous cell carcinoma in the setting of PD-1 inhibitory therapy with pembrolizumab. A PubMed literature review was conducted to identify other cases and determine the incidence of lichenoid reactions imitating squamous cell carcinoma in the setting of PD-1 inhibitor use.

Results: Our case is one of the few available pieces of literature describing eruptive hypertrophic lichen planus imitating SCC in the setting of PD-1 inhibitor use. Initial skin nodule biopsy appeared histologically compatible with squamous cell carcinoma. Repeat biopsy of the skin lesions revealed histological features consistent with hypertrophic lichen planus. Over time, lower extremity lesions evolved into a more typical appearance of hypertrophic lichen planus. Treatment with topical 0.05% clobetasol ointment and oral acitretin 25 mg led to complete resolution of lesions within 2-3 months.

Conclusions: This case underscores the significance of maintaining vigilance for lichenoid reactions as potential sequelae of PD-1 inhibitor therapy. It highlights the variability in initial presentation and the potential for lesions to transform over time. Timely recognition and appropriate management, including high-potency topical corticosteroids and oral acitretin, are crucial for achieving favorable outcomes in patients experiencing such reactions. More studies are necessary to fully analyze the rate of HLP occurrence as a consequence of PD-1 inhibitor use.

Background and objectives: Despite significant progress in biomedical research, the rate of success in oncology drug development remains inferior to that of other therapeutic fields. Mechanistic models provide comprehensive understanding of the therapeutic effects of drugs, which is crucial for designing effective clinical trials. This study was performed to acquire a better understanding of PI3K-AKT-TOR pathway modulation and preclinical to clinical translational bridging for a specific compound, apitolisib (PI3K/mTOR inhibitor), by developing integrated mechanistic models.

Methods: Integrated pharmacokinetic (PK)-pharmacodynamic (PD)-efficacy models were developed for xenografts bearing human renal cell adenocarcinoma and for patients with solid tumors (phase 1 studies) to characterize relationships between exposure of apitolisib, modulation of the phosphorylated Akt (pAkt) biomarker triggered by inhibition of the PI3K-AKT-mTOR pathway, and tumor response.

Results: Both clinical and preclinical integrated models show a steep sigmoid curve linking pAkt inhibition to tumor growth inhibition and quantified that a minimum of 35-45% pAkt modulation is required for tumor shrinkage in patients, based on platelet-rich plasma surrogate matrix and in xenografts based on tumor tissue matrix. Based on this relationship between targeted pAkt modulation and tumor shrinkage rate, it appeared that a constant pAkt inhibition of 61% and 65%, respectively, would be necessary to achieve tumor stasis in xenografts and patients.

Conclusions: These results help when it comes to evaluating the translatability of the preclinical analysis to the clinical target, and provide information that will enhance the value of future preclinical translational dose-finding and dose-optimization studies to accelerate clinical drug development.

Trial registry: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00854152 and NCT00854126.

Background: Bexarotene, which has been approved for use in Japan since 2016, is an effective drug for cutaneous T-cell lymphoma; however, careful management is imperative because of its adverse events. We previously demonstrated the severity of bexarotene-associated hypertriglyceridemia and the need for bexarotene dose reduction for patients with cutaneous T-cell lymphoma and high body mass index (BMI); however, high BMI does not affect the efficacy of combined bexarotene and phototherapy treatment.

Objective: This study aimed to verify the effects of BMI on hypertriglyceridemia associated with oral bexarotene therapy.

Methods: We conducted a post hoc analysis of data from a previous randomized, open-label clinical study that compared combined bexarotene-phototherapy treatment with bexarotene monotherapy for cutaneous T-cell lymphoma by dividing patients into two groups based on BMI (<23 kg/m² and ≥23 kg/m²).

Results: No statistically significant association was observed between patients with BMI ≥23 kg/m² and severe hypertriglyceridemia; however, there was a significant association between BMI ≥23 kg/m² and severe hypertriglyceridemia for patients who received bexarotene monotherapy, but not for those who received combined bexarotene-phototherapy treatment. The exact reasons for the discrepancies between the results of this thorough analysis and those of our past research are unclear. However, high BMI may be a risk factor for hypertriglyceridemia. Additional unidentified risk factors could also affect treatment outcomes.

Conclusion: High BMI is the primary reason for hypertriglyceridemia-associated bexarotene dose reduction; however, unexplored risk factors other than high BMI could exist.