首页 > 最新文献

European Journal of Oral Implantology最新文献

英文 中文
Autogenous transplant of two impacted mandibular canines: a case report with 2-year follow-up. 下颌阻生犬自体移植2例,随访2年。
Q1 Dentistry Pub Date : 2018-01-01
Tiziano Testori, Riccardo Scaini, Tommaso Weinstein, Matteo Deflorian, Silvio Taschieri, Massimo Del Fabbro

Purpose: To present a case report of autogenous transplant of two impacted mandibular canines.

Materials and methods: A 12-year-old girl, with vestibular impaction of mandibular left and right canines had them extracted and transplanted in the anatomically corrected sites, after an unsuccessful orthodontic treatment including surgical exposure.

Results: After 2 years the teeth are stable and their vitality is maintained.

Conclusions: In this case the transplantation of the mandibular canines was successful and maintained the vitality of the transplanted teeth for at least 2 years. By preserving the periodontal ligament is it possible to re-establish a functional tooth unit, which allows a physiologic growth of the jaws.

目的:报道两根下颌阻生犬自体移植的病例。材料和方法:一名12岁的女孩,下颌左右犬前庭嵌塞,在包括手术暴露在内的正畸治疗失败后,将其提取并移植到解剖矫正的部位。结果:术后2年,牙体稳定,保持活力。结论:本例移植成功,移植牙的活力维持至少2年。通过保留牙周韧带,有可能重建一个功能性的牙齿单位,这允许颌骨的生理性生长。
{"title":"Autogenous transplant of two impacted mandibular canines: a case report with 2-year follow-up.","authors":"Tiziano Testori,&nbsp;Riccardo Scaini,&nbsp;Tommaso Weinstein,&nbsp;Matteo Deflorian,&nbsp;Silvio Taschieri,&nbsp;Massimo Del Fabbro","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To present a case report of autogenous transplant of two impacted mandibular canines.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A 12-year-old girl, with vestibular impaction of mandibular left and right canines had them extracted and transplanted in the anatomically corrected sites, after an unsuccessful orthodontic treatment including surgical exposure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After 2 years the teeth are stable and their vitality is maintained.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this case the transplantation of the mandibular canines was successful and maintained the vitality of the transplanted teeth for at least 2 years. By preserving the periodontal ligament is it possible to re-establish a functional tooth unit, which allows a physiologic growth of the jaws.</p>","PeriodicalId":49259,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Oral Implantology","volume":"11 2","pages":"227-232"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"36136009","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Research in focus. 重点研究。
Q1 Dentistry Pub Date : 2018-01-01

This section presents a brief review of articles on dental implants considered of special interest for the reader, in order to encourage the developing of research, the interest for data analysis and the attention to scientific publications. Your comments are welcome. Please contact Dr Michele Nieri at michelenieri@gmail.com.

本节简要回顾了读者特别感兴趣的关于种植牙的文章,以鼓励研究的发展,对数据分析的兴趣和对科学出版物的关注。欢迎你的评论。请通过michelenieri@gmail.com联系Michele Nieri博士。
{"title":"Research in focus.","authors":"","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This section presents a brief review of articles on dental implants considered of special interest for the reader, in order to encourage the developing of research, the interest for data analysis and the attention to scientific publications. Your comments are welcome. Please contact Dr Michele Nieri at michelenieri@gmail.com.</p>","PeriodicalId":49259,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Oral Implantology","volume":"11 2","pages":"241-242"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"36136010","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Displacement of a dental implant in the mandible body: an unusual case report. 下颌骨种植体移位:一例罕见病例报告。
Q1 Dentistry Pub Date : 2018-01-01
Valeria Pistilli, Vittorio Checchi, Filippo De Paolis, Roberto Pistilli, Carlo Barausse

Purpose: To present a case of a woman referred for the management of displacement of one implant in her right posterior mandible that had occurred three days previously.

Materials and methods: After implant placement, the practitioner was no longer able to detect the implant and inserted a second one at the same site without taking a control radiograph. At the end of surgery, when a radiograph was finally taken, the first implant appeared displaced into the mandible body. The patient suffered total paresthesia on the right lower lip and chin. A flap was raised and bone osteotomies were performed on the lateral side of the mandible to create a rectangular cortical bone window that was removed. The implant was stuck by the second implant placed coronally, and only after unscrewing this second implant was it possible to remove the first one.

Results: After 18 months, the patient recovered full sensitivity.

Conclusions: In cases of implant displacement, it is always recommended that appropriate radiographs are performed to visualise where the implants could have been displaced in order to avoid more serious consequences.

目的:提出一个病例的妇女转介的位移种植体在她的右后下颌骨,发生了三天前。材料和方法:种植体放置后,医生不再能够检测到种植体,在没有进行对照x线片的情况下在同一位置插入第二颗种植体。在手术结束时,当拍摄x光片时,第一个植入物出现在下颌骨体内移位。患者右下唇和下巴感觉完全异常。将皮瓣提起,并在下颌骨外侧进行骨切开术,以创建矩形皮质骨窗,并将其移除。种植体被冠状放置的第二个种植体卡住,只有在拧开第二个种植体后才有可能移除第一个种植体。结果:18个月后,患者完全恢复敏感。结论:在假体移位的情况下,总是建议进行适当的x线片来观察假体可能移位的位置,以避免更严重的后果。
{"title":"Displacement of a dental implant in the mandible body: an unusual case report.","authors":"Valeria Pistilli,&nbsp;Vittorio Checchi,&nbsp;Filippo De Paolis,&nbsp;Roberto Pistilli,&nbsp;Carlo Barausse","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To present a case of a woman referred for the management of displacement of one implant in her right posterior mandible that had occurred three days previously.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>After implant placement, the practitioner was no longer able to detect the implant and inserted a second one at the same site without taking a control radiograph. At the end of surgery, when a radiograph was finally taken, the first implant appeared displaced into the mandible body. The patient suffered total paresthesia on the right lower lip and chin. A flap was raised and bone osteotomies were performed on the lateral side of the mandible to create a rectangular cortical bone window that was removed. The implant was stuck by the second implant placed coronally, and only after unscrewing this second implant was it possible to remove the first one.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After 18 months, the patient recovered full sensitivity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In cases of implant displacement, it is always recommended that appropriate radiographs are performed to visualise where the implants could have been displaced in order to avoid more serious consequences.</p>","PeriodicalId":49259,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Oral Implantology","volume":"11 2","pages":"235-240"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"36136011","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Oral implant survival in patients with bisphosphonate (BP)/antiresorptive and radiation therapy and their impact on osteonecrosis of the jaws. A systematic review. 双膦酸盐(BP)/抗吸收和放射治疗患者的口腔种植体存活率及其对颌骨骨坏死的影响。系统回顾。
Q1 Dentistry Pub Date : 2018-01-01
Christian M Schmitt, Mayte Buchbender, Rainer Lutz, Friedrich-Wilhelm Neukam

Aim: In this systematic review, we aimed to assess the impact of endosseous implants on the formation of an osteonecrosis of the jaw, as well as implant survival rates for patients under bisphosphonate (BP), antiresorptive and radiation therapy.

Materials and methods: An electronic search was performed using PubMed, Embase, and Medline databases with the logical operators: "dental implant", "antiresorptive", "bisphosphonate", "irradiation", "radiotherapy", "radiation", "necrosis" and "survival". The search was limited to articles published up to 15 December 2016. Recent publications were also searched manually to find any relevant studies that might have been missed using the search criteria noted above. The outcome variables were the implant survival rate and the frequency of osteonecrosis of the jaws.

Results: In total, 18 studies addressing oral implants in patients with BP or antiresorptive therapy and 23 with radiation therapy met the inclusion criteria and were included in this systematic review. Most of the studies had a retrospective design with a level of evidence (LoE) of III (moderately high risk of bias). Implant survival rate ranged from 92.86% to 100% in patients with BP/antiresorptive therapy (all due to osteoporosis) and 38.5% to 97.9% in patients with radiation therapy. For BP patients, osteonecrosis in relation to oral implants more frequently occurred in patients taking BPs due to malignant diseases. In patients with radiation therapy, an "implant triggered" necrosis is also a potential complication. The lack of data in the current literature concerning this issue does not allow a proper risk assessment to date.

Conclusions: Within the limits of this systematic review, implant treatment concepts seem to be a valuable approach in patients with radiation therapy and patients with BP therapy due to an osteoporosis. In patients taking BPs due to a malignant disease, implant treatments are not recommended due to the high number of reported implant-related necrosis in this patient cohort. Outcomes of this review should, however, be regarded with caution due to the low level of evidence of the currently existing data.

目的:在这篇系统综述中,我们旨在评估骨内种植体对颌骨骨坏死形成的影响,以及接受双膦酸盐(BP)、抗吸收和放射治疗的患者种植体存活率。材料和方法:使用PubMed、Embase和Medline数据库进行电子检索,逻辑运算符为:“dental implant”、“anti - absorptive”、“bisphosphonate”、“irradiation”、“放疗”、“radiation”、“necrosis”和“survival”。检索仅限于截至2016年12月15日发表的文章。还手动检索了最近的出版物,以查找使用上述搜索标准可能错过的任何相关研究。结果变量是种植体的存活率和颌骨骨坏死的频率。结果:共有18项针对BP或抗吸收治疗患者口腔种植体的研究和23项针对放射治疗患者的研究符合纳入标准,并被纳入本系统综述。大多数研究采用回顾性设计,证据水平(LoE)为III(偏倚风险中等)。BP/抗吸收治疗组种植体存活率为92.86% ~ 100%(均因骨质疏松),放疗组种植体存活率为38.5% ~ 97.9%。对于BP患者,由于恶性疾病而服用BP的患者更常发生与口腔种植体相关的骨坏死。在接受放射治疗的患者中,“植入物引发的”坏死也是一个潜在的并发症。目前文献中关于这一问题的数据缺乏,迄今为止无法进行适当的风险评估。结论:在本系统综述的范围内,对于因骨质疏松而接受放射治疗和BP治疗的患者,种植体治疗概念似乎是一种有价值的方法。在因恶性疾病而服用bp的患者中,由于该患者队列中报道的植入物相关坏死的数量较多,因此不推荐植入物治疗。然而,由于现有数据的证据水平较低,应谨慎看待本综述的结果。
{"title":"Oral implant survival in patients with bisphosphonate (BP)/antiresorptive and radiation therapy and their impact on osteonecrosis of the jaws. A systematic review.","authors":"Christian M Schmitt,&nbsp;Mayte Buchbender,&nbsp;Rainer Lutz,&nbsp;Friedrich-Wilhelm Neukam","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>In this systematic review, we aimed to assess the impact of endosseous implants on the formation of an osteonecrosis of the jaw, as well as implant survival rates for patients under bisphosphonate (BP), antiresorptive and radiation therapy.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>An electronic search was performed using PubMed, Embase, and Medline databases with the logical operators: \"dental implant\", \"antiresorptive\", \"bisphosphonate\", \"irradiation\", \"radiotherapy\", \"radiation\", \"necrosis\" and \"survival\". The search was limited to articles published up to 15 December 2016. Recent publications were also searched manually to find any relevant studies that might have been missed using the search criteria noted above. The outcome variables were the implant survival rate and the frequency of osteonecrosis of the jaws.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 18 studies addressing oral implants in patients with BP or antiresorptive therapy and 23 with radiation therapy met the inclusion criteria and were included in this systematic review. Most of the studies had a retrospective design with a level of evidence (LoE) of III (moderately high risk of bias). Implant survival rate ranged from 92.86% to 100% in patients with BP/antiresorptive therapy (all due to osteoporosis) and 38.5% to 97.9% in patients with radiation therapy. For BP patients, osteonecrosis in relation to oral implants more frequently occurred in patients taking BPs due to malignant diseases. In patients with radiation therapy, an \"implant triggered\" necrosis is also a potential complication. The lack of data in the current literature concerning this issue does not allow a proper risk assessment to date.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Within the limits of this systematic review, implant treatment concepts seem to be a valuable approach in patients with radiation therapy and patients with BP therapy due to an osteoporosis. In patients taking BPs due to a malignant disease, implant treatments are not recommended due to the high number of reported implant-related necrosis in this patient cohort. Outcomes of this review should, however, be regarded with caution due to the low level of evidence of the currently existing data.</p>","PeriodicalId":49259,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Oral Implantology","volume":"11 Suppl 1 ","pages":"S93-S111"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"36395104","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Does it still make sense to believe published scientific literature? Editorial. 相信已发表的科学文献还有意义吗?社论。
Q1 Dentistry Pub Date : 2018-01-01
Marco Esposito
{"title":"Does it still make sense to believe published scientific literature? Editorial.","authors":"Marco Esposito","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":49259,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Oral Implantology","volume":"11 1","pages":"5-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"35929000","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Posterior atrophic jaws rehabilitated with prostheses supported by 6 mm long × 4 mm wide implants or by longer implants in augmented bone. 3-year post-loading results from a randomised controlled trial. 用6mm长× 4mm宽的种植体或更长的种植体在增强型骨中支持的假体修复后萎缩颌骨。加载后3年的随机对照试验结果。
Q1 Dentistry Pub Date : 2018-01-01
Pietro Felice, Carlo Barausse, Valeria Pistilli, Maurizio Piattelli, Daniela Rita Ippolito, Marco Esposito

Purpose: To evaluate whether 6 mm long × 4 mm wide dental implants could be an alternative to implants of at least 10 mm long placed in bone augmented with bone substitutes in posterior atrophic jaws.

Materials and methods: A total of 20 patients with bilateral atrophic mandibles, and 20 patients with bilateral atrophic maxillae, having 5 mm to 7 mm of bone height below the maxillary sinus or 6 mm to 8 mm above the mandibular canal, had their side of the jaws randomly allocated according to a split-mouth design. They were allocated to receive one to three 6 mm long × 4 mm wide implants, or implants of at least 10 mm long in augmented bone by two different surgeons at different centres. Mandibles were vertically augmented with interpositional equine bone blocks and resorbable barriers, and implants were placed 3 months later. Maxillary sinuses were augmented with particulated porcine bone via a lateral window and implants were placed simultaneously. After 4 months, all implants were submerged and loaded with provisional prostheses. Four months later, definitive prostheses were delivered. Outcome measures were prosthesis and implant failures, any complication and radiographic peri-implant marginal bone level changes.

Results: Five patients (three treated in mandibles and two in maxillae) dropped out before the 3-year post-loading follow-up. Two short maxillary implants affected by peri-implantitis failed together with their prosthesis vs three mandibular prostheses that could not be placed on implants at least 10 mm long due to graft failures; one was associated with the loss of three implants because of infection. There were no statistically significant differences in implant (difference in proportions = 0.000; 95% CI: -0.140 to 0.140; P = 1.000) and prosthesis failures (difference in proportions = 0.057; 95% CI: -0.094 to 0.216; P = 0.625). In total, 18 complications occurred in 13 patients at augmented sites vs four complications in three patients with 6 mm long implants. Significantly more complications occurred at grafted sites in mandibles (difference in proportions = 0.353; 95% CI: 0.005 to 0.616; P = 0.031), but not in maxillae (difference in proportions = 0.222; 95% CI: -0.071 to 0.486; P = 0.219). In mandibles, patients with 6 mm long implants lost an average of 1.25 mm of peri-implant bone at 3 years vs 1.54 mm in patients with implants of at least 10 mm long. The difference was statistically significant (mean difference = 0.29 mm; 95% CI: 0.08 to 0.51 mm; P = 0.010). In maxillas, patients with 6 mm-long implants lost an average of 1.28 mm of peri-implant bone at 3 years vs 1.50 mm in patients with implants of at least 10 mm long. The difference was statistically significant (mean difference = 0.22 mm; 95% CI: 0.08 to 0.35 mm; P = 0.003).

Conclusions: Results at 3 years after loading indicate that 6 mm long implants with a conventional diameter of 4

目的:评价6mm长× 4mm宽的种植体是否可以替代至少10mm长的种植体放置在萎缩后颌骨的骨增殖剂中。材料与方法:选取20例双侧萎缩性下颌骨患者和20例双侧萎缩性上颌骨患者,分别在上颌窦以下骨高5 ~ 7 mm或在下颌管上方6 ~ 8 mm,采用裂口设计随机分配其侧颌。他们被分配接受1到3个6毫米长× 4毫米宽的植入物,或至少10毫米长的增强骨植入物,由不同中心的两名不同的外科医生进行。使用马骨块和可吸收屏障垂直增强下颌骨,3个月后放置种植体。上颌窦通过侧窗用猪骨颗粒增强,同时放置种植体。4个月后,所有种植体均浸入水中并装载临时假体。4个月后,最终义肢交付。结果测量假体和种植体失败,任何并发症和x线片种植体周围边缘骨水平改变。结果:5例患者(下颌骨3例,上颌2例)在加载后3年随访前退出。2个短的上颌种植体因种植体周围炎而与假体一起失败,3个下颌假体因移植失败而无法放置在至少10mm长的种植体上;其中一例因感染而丢失了三颗植入物。种植体数量差异无统计学意义(比例差异= 0.000;95% CI: -0.140 ~ 0.140;P = 1.000)和假体失败(比例差异= 0.057;95% CI: -0.094 ~ 0.216;P = 0.625)。总共有13例患者出现18个并发症,而3例患者出现4个并发症,种植体长度为6mm。下颌骨移植部位并发症发生率明显高于移植部位(比例差异= 0.353;95% CI: 0.005 ~ 0.616;P = 0.031),但在上颌骨上无差异(比例差异= 0.222;95% CI: -0.071 ~ 0.486;P = 0.219)。在下颌骨,使用6mm长的种植体的患者在3年内平均损失1.25 mm的种植体周围骨,而使用至少10mm长的种植体的患者平均损失1.54 mm。差异有统计学意义(平均差异= 0.29 mm;95% CI: 0.08 ~ 0.51 mm;P = 0.010)。在上颌,种植体长度为6mm的患者在3年内平均损失1.28 mm的种植体周围骨,而种植体长度至少为10mm的患者平均损失1.50 mm。差异有统计学意义(平均差异= 0.22 mm;95% CI: 0.08 ~ 0.35 mm;P = 0.003)。结论:加载后3年的结果表明,常规直径为4mm的6mm长种植体与放置在增强骨上的长种植体相比,效果相似,如果不是更好的话。短的植入物可能是一个更好的选择,特别是在后下颌骨,因为治疗更快,更便宜,发病率更低。然而,在提出可靠的建议之前,需要在加载后5至10年获得数据。
{"title":"Posterior atrophic jaws rehabilitated with prostheses supported by 6 mm long × 4 mm wide implants or by longer implants in augmented bone. 3-year post-loading results from a randomised controlled trial.","authors":"Pietro Felice,&nbsp;Carlo Barausse,&nbsp;Valeria Pistilli,&nbsp;Maurizio Piattelli,&nbsp;Daniela Rita Ippolito,&nbsp;Marco Esposito","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate whether 6 mm long × 4 mm wide dental implants could be an alternative to implants of at least 10 mm long placed in bone augmented with bone substitutes in posterior atrophic jaws.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A total of 20 patients with bilateral atrophic mandibles, and 20 patients with bilateral atrophic maxillae, having 5 mm to 7 mm of bone height below the maxillary sinus or 6 mm to 8 mm above the mandibular canal, had their side of the jaws randomly allocated according to a split-mouth design. They were allocated to receive one to three 6 mm long × 4 mm wide implants, or implants of at least 10 mm long in augmented bone by two different surgeons at different centres. Mandibles were vertically augmented with interpositional equine bone blocks and resorbable barriers, and implants were placed 3 months later. Maxillary sinuses were augmented with particulated porcine bone via a lateral window and implants were placed simultaneously. After 4 months, all implants were submerged and loaded with provisional prostheses. Four months later, definitive prostheses were delivered. Outcome measures were prosthesis and implant failures, any complication and radiographic peri-implant marginal bone level changes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five patients (three treated in mandibles and two in maxillae) dropped out before the 3-year post-loading follow-up. Two short maxillary implants affected by peri-implantitis failed together with their prosthesis vs three mandibular prostheses that could not be placed on implants at least 10 mm long due to graft failures; one was associated with the loss of three implants because of infection. There were no statistically significant differences in implant (difference in proportions = 0.000; 95% CI: -0.140 to 0.140; P = 1.000) and prosthesis failures (difference in proportions = 0.057; 95% CI: -0.094 to 0.216; P = 0.625). In total, 18 complications occurred in 13 patients at augmented sites vs four complications in three patients with 6 mm long implants. Significantly more complications occurred at grafted sites in mandibles (difference in proportions = 0.353; 95% CI: 0.005 to 0.616; P = 0.031), but not in maxillae (difference in proportions = 0.222; 95% CI: -0.071 to 0.486; P = 0.219). In mandibles, patients with 6 mm long implants lost an average of 1.25 mm of peri-implant bone at 3 years vs 1.54 mm in patients with implants of at least 10 mm long. The difference was statistically significant (mean difference = 0.29 mm; 95% CI: 0.08 to 0.51 mm; P = 0.010). In maxillas, patients with 6 mm-long implants lost an average of 1.28 mm of peri-implant bone at 3 years vs 1.50 mm in patients with implants of at least 10 mm long. The difference was statistically significant (mean difference = 0.22 mm; 95% CI: 0.08 to 0.35 mm; P = 0.003).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Results at 3 years after loading indicate that 6 mm long implants with a conventional diameter of 4 ","PeriodicalId":49259,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Oral Implantology","volume":"11 2","pages":"175-187"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"36136985","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Non-surgical mechanical treatment of peri-implant mucositis: the effect of sub-mucosal mechanical instrumentation following supra-mucosal plaque removal. A 7-month prospective single cohort study. 种植体周围粘膜炎的非手术机械治疗:去除粘膜上斑块后粘膜下机械器械的效果。一项7个月的前瞻性单队列研究。
Q1 Dentistry Pub Date : 2018-01-01
Giovanni Serino, Masahiro Wada

Purpose: To evaluate the effect of sub-mucosal mechanical instrumentation following supra-mucosal plaque removal in the treatment of peri-implant mucositis.

Materials and methods: A total of 44 patients, 27 from a specialist clinic in Sweden, and 17 from a Japanese one, were included. The 44 patients had a total of 175 implants of which 84 (48%) had clinical signs of mucositis (bleeding on probing [BoP]) and no radiographic bone loss. At baseline, the 44 patients received professional supra-mucosal plaque removal and oral hygiene instruction and motivation. Following the 1-month examination, sub-mucosal instrumentation was initiated using ultrasonic and hand instruments. Patients were then examined at 4 and 7 months. Presence of plaque, marginal bleeding, BoP and probing pocket depth (PPD) changes were recorded at each examination in an unblinded manner.

Results: One month following supra-mucosal plaque removal, the number of treated implants with BoP was reduced from 84 to 44 (48% reduction) with a concomitant decrease of the mean PPD of 0.6 mm (95% CI: -0.5 to -0.7), from 4.4 ± 1.0 mm (mean ± SD) to 3.8 ± 1.0 mm, P < 0.0001. Following sub-mucosal instrumentation, a further reduction of 9% (from 44% to 36%) of BoP was recorded, with a concomitant reduction of the mean PPD of 0.3 mm (95% CI: -0.1 to -0.4) at the 7-month examination.

Conclusions: The improvement of the clinical condition (absence of marginal bleeding, BoP and PPD reduction at treated implants) following non-surgical treatment of mucositis appeared to be in great part because of supra-mucosal plaque removal, while the sub-mucosal instrumentation seemed to have only a minor additional effect. Deep implant position compared to neighbouring teeth/implant was associated with persisting mucositis following treatment. The presence of deep pockets following treatment was associated with BoP, screw-retained prostheses without abutment and sub-mucosal crown margins.

目的:评价粘膜上斑块去除后粘膜下机械器械在种植体周围粘膜炎治疗中的效果。材料与方法:共纳入44例患者,其中27例来自瑞典一家专科诊所,17例来自日本一家专科诊所。44例患者共植入175个种植体,其中84例(48%)有黏膜炎的临床症状(探查出血[BoP]),无影像学骨质流失。在基线时,44名患者接受了专业的粘膜上菌斑清除和口腔卫生指导和激励。检查1个月后,开始使用超声和手动仪器进行粘膜下仪器检查。然后在4个月和7个月时对患者进行检查。在每次检查中以非盲方式记录斑块、边缘出血、防喷器和探测袋深度(PPD)的变化。结果:粘膜上斑块去除1个月后,BoP处理的种植体数量从84个减少到44个(减少48%),同时平均PPD下降0.6 mm (95% CI: -0.5至-0.7),从4.4±1.0 mm (mean±SD)下降到3.8±1.0 mm, P < 0.0001。在粘膜下检查后,记录到BoP进一步降低9%(从44%降至36%),同时在7个月的检查中,PPD平均降低0.3 mm (95% CI: -0.1至-0.4)。结论:非手术治疗粘膜炎后临床状况的改善(无边缘出血,治疗后种植体BoP和PPD降低)似乎在很大程度上是因为粘膜上斑块的清除,而粘膜下内固定似乎只有很小的额外效果。与邻近牙齿/种植体相比,深层种植体的位置与治疗后持续的黏膜炎有关。治疗后出现的深囊与BoP、无基台的螺钉保留假体和粘膜下冠缘有关。
{"title":"Non-surgical mechanical treatment of peri-implant mucositis: the effect of sub-mucosal mechanical instrumentation following supra-mucosal plaque removal. A 7-month prospective single cohort study.","authors":"Giovanni Serino,&nbsp;Masahiro Wada","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the effect of sub-mucosal mechanical instrumentation following supra-mucosal plaque removal in the treatment of peri-implant mucositis.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A total of 44 patients, 27 from a specialist clinic in Sweden, and 17 from a Japanese one, were included. The 44 patients had a total of 175 implants of which 84 (48%) had clinical signs of mucositis (bleeding on probing [BoP]) and no radiographic bone loss. At baseline, the 44 patients received professional supra-mucosal plaque removal and oral hygiene instruction and motivation. Following the 1-month examination, sub-mucosal instrumentation was initiated using ultrasonic and hand instruments. Patients were then examined at 4 and 7 months. Presence of plaque, marginal bleeding, BoP and probing pocket depth (PPD) changes were recorded at each examination in an unblinded manner.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One month following supra-mucosal plaque removal, the number of treated implants with BoP was reduced from 84 to 44 (48% reduction) with a concomitant decrease of the mean PPD of 0.6 mm (95% CI: -0.5 to -0.7), from 4.4 ± 1.0 mm (mean ± SD) to 3.8 ± 1.0 mm, P < 0.0001. Following sub-mucosal instrumentation, a further reduction of 9% (from 44% to 36%) of BoP was recorded, with a concomitant reduction of the mean PPD of 0.3 mm (95% CI: -0.1 to -0.4) at the 7-month examination.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The improvement of the clinical condition (absence of marginal bleeding, BoP and PPD reduction at treated implants) following non-surgical treatment of mucositis appeared to be in great part because of supra-mucosal plaque removal, while the sub-mucosal instrumentation seemed to have only a minor additional effect. Deep implant position compared to neighbouring teeth/implant was associated with persisting mucositis following treatment. The presence of deep pockets following treatment was associated with BoP, screw-retained prostheses without abutment and sub-mucosal crown margins.</p>","PeriodicalId":49259,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Oral Implantology","volume":"11 4","pages":"455-466"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"36750755","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Do we need abutments at immediately loaded implants supporting cross-arch fixed prostheses? Results from a 5-year randomised controlled trial. 我们是否需要立即加载种植体来支持交叉弓固定假体?结果来自一项5年随机对照试验。
Q1 Dentistry Pub Date : 2018-01-01
Marzio Todisco, Luca Sbricoli, Daniela Rita Ippolito, Marco Esposito

Purpose: To compare the clinical outcome (in particular of marginal peri-implant bone level changes) between immediately loaded straight implants which had definitive abutments placed at implant placement and never removed versus implants which had no intermediate abutments.

Materials and methods: Thirty-two edentulous patients had one of their jaws rehabilitated with a provisional screw-retained resin reinforced cross-arch fixed prosthesis supported by four immediately loaded implants: two central straight implants and two either tilted or straight distal implants. The two central straight implants were randomly allocated in two equal groups to receive or not an intermediate abutment (Multi-Unit Abutment, MUA) according to a parallel group design. To be immediately loaded implants had to be inserted with a minimum torque of 30 Ncm, which was achieved by all implants. After 4 months, definitive screw-retained metal-ceramic prostheses were delivered and patients were followed-up to 5 years after loading. Prostheses were removed every 8 months to facilitate professionally delivered maintenance. Outcome measures were prosthesis and implant failures, complications, peri-implant marginal bone level changes and bleeding on probing (BoP).

Results: Five-years after loading one patient dropped out from each group. No implant or prosthetic failure occurred. Three patients of the abutment group versus one of the no-abutment group were affected by complications (risk difference = 0.125; 95% CI: -0.13 to 0.37; Fisher exact test, P = 0.600). At 5 years, both groups lost marginal bone in a statistically significant way (0.32 ± 0.40 mm for patients of the abutment group and 0.35 ± 0.29 mm for patients of the no-abutment group), with no difference in bone loss between groups at patient levels (difference = 0.03 mm; 95% CI: -0.23 to 0.29 mm; P = 0.809). At 5 years, BoP was significantly higher in the no-abutment group than in the abutment group (difference between medians = 25%; 95% CI: 12.5% to 25%; P < 0.001). By considering only the average of the two central study implants per patient with and without intermediate abutments, there were no differences in bone loss (difference: -0.05 mm; 95% CI: -0.41 to 0.31 mm; P = 0.763), while marginal bleeding was significantly higher in the no-abutment group (difference between medians = 25%; 95% CI: 0% to 50%; P = 0.004).

Conclusions: The present results suggest that intermediate abutments may not be needed at immediately loaded cross-arch screw-retained prostheses, unless there is the necessity to correct implant angulation.

目的:比较在种植体位置放置确定基台且从未移除的即刻加载直种植体与没有中间基台的种植体的临床结果(特别是种植体周围边缘骨水平变化)。材料和方法:32例无牙患者使用临时螺钉保留树脂增强交叉弓固定假体修复其中一个颌骨,由四个立即加载的种植体支撑:两个中央直种植体和两个倾斜或直的远端种植体。采用平行组设计,将2个中央直种植体随机分为两组,分别接受或不接受中间基牙(Multi-Unit abitment, MUA)。为了立即加载种植体,必须以最小30 Ncm的扭矩插入,所有种植体都达到了这一目标。4个月后,植入固定螺钉的金属陶瓷假体,患者随访5年。假体每8个月取出一次,以方便专业人员进行维护。结果测量假体和种植体失败、并发症、种植体周围边缘骨水平改变和探探出血(BoP)。结果:加载5年后,每组均有1例患者退出。无种植体或假体失效。基牙组3例患者出现并发症,无基牙组1例(风险差= 0.125;95% CI: -0.13 ~ 0.37;Fisher精确检验,P = 0.600)。5年时,两组边缘骨丢失均有统计学意义(有基牙组为0.32±0.40 mm,无基牙组为0.35±0.29 mm),两组在患者水平上的骨丢失无差异(差异= 0.03 mm;95% CI: -0.23 ~ 0.29 mm;P = 0.809)。5年时,无基牙组的BoP明显高于基牙组(中位数差= 25%;95% CI: 12.5% ~ 25%;P < 0.001)。通过仅考虑每位患者有和没有中间基牙的两个中心研究种植体的平均值,骨丢失没有差异(差异:-0.05 mm;95% CI: -0.41 ~ 0.31 mm;P = 0.763),而无基台组边缘出血明显高于无基台组(中位数差异= 25%;95% CI: 0% ~ 50%;P = 0.004)。结论:目前的结果表明,除非有必要纠正种植体的角度,否则立即加载的十字弓螺钉保留假体可能不需要中间基台。
{"title":"Do we need abutments at immediately loaded implants supporting cross-arch fixed prostheses? Results from a 5-year randomised controlled trial.","authors":"Marzio Todisco,&nbsp;Luca Sbricoli,&nbsp;Daniela Rita Ippolito,&nbsp;Marco Esposito","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare the clinical outcome (in particular of marginal peri-implant bone level changes) between immediately loaded straight implants which had definitive abutments placed at implant placement and never removed versus implants which had no intermediate abutments.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Thirty-two edentulous patients had one of their jaws rehabilitated with a provisional screw-retained resin reinforced cross-arch fixed prosthesis supported by four immediately loaded implants: two central straight implants and two either tilted or straight distal implants. The two central straight implants were randomly allocated in two equal groups to receive or not an intermediate abutment (Multi-Unit Abutment, MUA) according to a parallel group design. To be immediately loaded implants had to be inserted with a minimum torque of 30 Ncm, which was achieved by all implants. After 4 months, definitive screw-retained metal-ceramic prostheses were delivered and patients were followed-up to 5 years after loading. Prostheses were removed every 8 months to facilitate professionally delivered maintenance. Outcome measures were prosthesis and implant failures, complications, peri-implant marginal bone level changes and bleeding on probing (BoP).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five-years after loading one patient dropped out from each group. No implant or prosthetic failure occurred. Three patients of the abutment group versus one of the no-abutment group were affected by complications (risk difference = 0.125; 95% CI: -0.13 to 0.37; Fisher exact test, P = 0.600). At 5 years, both groups lost marginal bone in a statistically significant way (0.32 ± 0.40 mm for patients of the abutment group and 0.35 ± 0.29 mm for patients of the no-abutment group), with no difference in bone loss between groups at patient levels (difference = 0.03 mm; 95% CI: -0.23 to 0.29 mm; P = 0.809). At 5 years, BoP was significantly higher in the no-abutment group than in the abutment group (difference between medians = 25%; 95% CI: 12.5% to 25%; P < 0.001). By considering only the average of the two central study implants per patient with and without intermediate abutments, there were no differences in bone loss (difference: -0.05 mm; 95% CI: -0.41 to 0.31 mm; P = 0.763), while marginal bleeding was significantly higher in the no-abutment group (difference between medians = 25%; 95% CI: 0% to 50%; P = 0.004).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The present results suggest that intermediate abutments may not be needed at immediately loaded cross-arch screw-retained prostheses, unless there is the necessity to correct implant angulation.</p>","PeriodicalId":49259,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Oral Implantology","volume":"11 4","pages":"397-407"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"36750850","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Immediate vs conventional loading of variable-thread tapered implants supporting three- to four-unit fixed partial dentures in the posterior maxilla: 1-year interim results of a split-mouth randomised controlled trial. 即刻与常规负载可变螺纹锥形种植体支持后颌三至四单元固定局部义齿:一项裂口随机对照试验的1年中期结果
Q1 Dentistry Pub Date : 2018-01-01
Habib Abi-Aad, Fadi Daher, Hani Dimassi, Giampiero Cordioli, Zeina Majzoub

Purpose: To compare the outcome of immediately loaded and one-stage conventionally loaded variable-thread tapered implants in the posterior maxilla.

Materials and methods: This study was designed as a split-mouth randomised controlled trial. Twenty-six patients missing teeth bilaterally in the posterior maxilla received three to four implants in each of the posterior sextants. Bone quality was recorded based on Misch criteria (D1-D4) and insertion torque values were measured using a manual wrench. The implants on one side were immediately loaded with a temporary resin fixed partial denture on definitive multi-unit abutments. The implants in the contralateral side received definitive multi-unit abutments according to the one-stage unloaded protocol. Three to 3.5 months following implant placement, the implants were restored with metal-ceramic fixed prostheses. Outcome measures were implant and prosthesis failure rates, complications, and peri-implant bone level changes at 1 year following delivery of the definitive prostheses.

Results: Two patients dropped out prior to the delivery of definitive prostheses. Four implants supporting a four-unit immediately loaded prosthesis failed in one patient, 3 months following delivery of the definitive prostheses. None of the conventionally loaded implants or prostheses failed. There were no significant differences in the proportions of implant and prosthesis failures (difference = 4.2%; 95% CI -4.2 to 12.6%; P = 0.999). In the immediately loaded group, four early prosthetic complications occurred during the provisionalization phase (three small resin chippings and one prosthetic screw loosening). No other complications were reported. The difference in the rate of complications between the two interventions was not statistically significant (difference = 16.7%; 95% CI -1.2% to 35.6%; P = 0.125). The 1-year peri-implant marginal bone level changes were evaluated in 23 patients (77 immediately loaded and 76 conventionally loaded implants). On average, patients lost 0.42 mm at the immediately loaded and 0.46 mm at the conventionally loaded implants, the difference being statistically not significant (difference = 0.044 mm; 95% CI -0.27 to 0.18 mm; P = 0.701).

Conclusions: Immediate loading of 3- to 4-unit fixed partial prostheses supported by variable-thread implants in the posterior maxilla can yield good and similar 1-year results to one-stage conventionally loaded implants.

目的:比较即刻加载和一期常规加载可变螺纹锥形种植体在上颌骨后牙的效果。材料与方法:本研究采用裂口随机对照试验。26例双侧后上颌缺牙的患者在每个后六分体上接受了三到四个种植体。根据Misch标准(D1-D4)记录骨质量,使用手动扳手测量插入扭矩值。一侧种植体即刻在确定多单元基牙上装载临时树脂固定局部义齿。对侧种植体根据一期卸载方案接受确定的多单元基台。种植体放置后3 ~ 3.5个月,用金属-陶瓷固定假体修复种植体。结果测量是种植体和假体的失败率、并发症和植入假体后1年的种植体周围骨水平变化。结果:2例患者在最终义肢交付前退出。在最终假体交付3个月后,1例患者4个种植体支持4个单元立即加载的假体失败。没有一个传统的植入物或假体失败。种植体和假体失败的比例差异无统计学意义(差异= 4.2%;95% CI -4.2至12.6%;P = 0.999)。即刻加载组在预备阶段发生了4例早期假体并发症(3例小树脂碎裂和1例假体螺钉松动)。无其他并发症报道。两种干预措施的并发症发生率差异无统计学意义(差异= 16.7%;95% CI -1.2%至35.6%;P = 0.125)。对23例患者(77例即刻加载,76例常规加载)1年内种植体周围边缘骨水平变化进行了评估。即刻加载组患者平均损失0.42 mm,常规加载组患者平均损失0.46 mm,差异无统计学意义(差异= 0.044 mm;95% CI -0.27 ~ 0.18 mm;P = 0.701)。结论:上颌后牙即刻加载3- 4单元固定部分假体与一期常规加载假体相比,可获得良好且相似的1年效果。
{"title":"Immediate vs conventional loading of variable-thread tapered implants supporting three- to four-unit fixed partial dentures in the posterior maxilla: 1-year interim results of a split-mouth randomised controlled trial.","authors":"Habib Abi-Aad,&nbsp;Fadi Daher,&nbsp;Hani Dimassi,&nbsp;Giampiero Cordioli,&nbsp;Zeina Majzoub","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare the outcome of immediately loaded and one-stage conventionally loaded variable-thread tapered implants in the posterior maxilla.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This study was designed as a split-mouth randomised controlled trial. Twenty-six patients missing teeth bilaterally in the posterior maxilla received three to four implants in each of the posterior sextants. Bone quality was recorded based on Misch criteria (D1-D4) and insertion torque values were measured using a manual wrench. The implants on one side were immediately loaded with a temporary resin fixed partial denture on definitive multi-unit abutments. The implants in the contralateral side received definitive multi-unit abutments according to the one-stage unloaded protocol. Three to 3.5 months following implant placement, the implants were restored with metal-ceramic fixed prostheses. Outcome measures were implant and prosthesis failure rates, complications, and peri-implant bone level changes at 1 year following delivery of the definitive prostheses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two patients dropped out prior to the delivery of definitive prostheses. Four implants supporting a four-unit immediately loaded prosthesis failed in one patient, 3 months following delivery of the definitive prostheses. None of the conventionally loaded implants or prostheses failed. There were no significant differences in the proportions of implant and prosthesis failures (difference = 4.2%; 95% CI -4.2 to 12.6%; P = 0.999). In the immediately loaded group, four early prosthetic complications occurred during the provisionalization phase (three small resin chippings and one prosthetic screw loosening). No other complications were reported. The difference in the rate of complications between the two interventions was not statistically significant (difference = 16.7%; 95% CI -1.2% to 35.6%; P = 0.125). The 1-year peri-implant marginal bone level changes were evaluated in 23 patients (77 immediately loaded and 76 conventionally loaded implants). On average, patients lost 0.42 mm at the immediately loaded and 0.46 mm at the conventionally loaded implants, the difference being statistically not significant (difference = 0.044 mm; 95% CI -0.27 to 0.18 mm; P = 0.701).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Immediate loading of 3- to 4-unit fixed partial prostheses supported by variable-thread implants in the posterior maxilla can yield good and similar 1-year results to one-stage conventionally loaded implants.</p>","PeriodicalId":49259,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Oral Implantology","volume":"11 3","pages":"337-350"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"36514162","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Editorial: Overviews and umbrella reviews. 社论:概述和概括性评论。
Q1 Dentistry Pub Date : 2018-01-01
Marco Esposito
{"title":"Editorial: Overviews and umbrella reviews.","authors":"Marco Esposito","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":49259,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Oral Implantology","volume":"11 3","pages":"255"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"36516207","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
European Journal of Oral Implantology
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1