Sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSNHL) presents as the abrupt onset of hearing loss. Approximately 88% of SSNHL has no identifiable etiology and is termed idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss (ISSHL). Hearing specialists have investigated ISSHL since the 1970s. Over the past 30 years, more than 800 articles, or one every two weeks, have been published in the English medical literature. ISSHL is the abrupt onset of hearing loss, usually unilaterally and upon wakening, that involves a hearing loss of at least 30 decibels (dB) occurring within three days over at least three contiguous frequencies. As most patients do not present with premorbid audiograms, the degree of hearing loss is usually defined by the presentation thresholds of the unaffected ear. Other associated symptoms include tinnitus, aural fullness, dizziness and vertigo. The historical incidence of ISSHL ranges from 5-20 cases/100,000 population, with approximately 4,000 new cases per annum in the United States. The true incidence is thought to be higher, as ISSHL is thought to be underreported. Interestingly, 4,000 cases annually calculate to 1.3 cases/ 100,000 in the United States; therefore, an incidence of 5-20/100,000 would translate to > 15,000 new ISSHL cases per annum in the United States. Recent literature has placed the annual ISSHL incidence in the United States as 27 cases/100,000, with a pediatric incidence of 11 cases/100,000. Other studies report that the incidence is increasing (160/100,000), especially in the elderly (77/100,000), and conclude that ISSHL is no longer rare. In 1984, Byl reviewed the literature and found the mean age of ISSHL presentation to be 46-49 years, with variation of incidence with age and an equal gender distribution. The presentation of ISSHL does not appear to have seasonal variations, uneven distributions of presentation throughout the year, or an association with upper respiratory infections, either prior to or following symptom onset. The spontaneous recovery is currently thought to be 30-60%.
{"title":"REPRINTED FROM THE 2023 HYPERBARIC INDICATIONS MANUAL 15<sup>th</sup> Edition: Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss.","authors":"Tracy Leigh LeGros, Heather Murphy-Lavoie","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSNHL) presents as the abrupt onset of hearing loss. Approximately 88% of SSNHL has no identifiable etiology and is termed idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss (ISSHL). Hearing specialists have investigated ISSHL since the 1970s. Over the past 30 years, more than 800 articles, or one every two weeks, have been published in the English medical literature. ISSHL is the abrupt onset of hearing loss, usually unilaterally and upon wakening, that involves a hearing loss of at least 30 decibels (dB) occurring within three days over at least three contiguous frequencies. As most patients do not present with premorbid audiograms, the degree of hearing loss is usually defined by the presentation thresholds of the unaffected ear. Other associated symptoms include tinnitus, aural fullness, dizziness and vertigo. The historical incidence of ISSHL ranges from 5-20 cases/100,000 population, with approximately 4,000 new cases per annum in the United States. The true incidence is thought to be higher, as ISSHL is thought to be underreported. Interestingly, 4,000 cases annually calculate to 1.3 cases/ 100,000 in the United States; therefore, an incidence of 5-20/100,000 would translate to > 15,000 new ISSHL cases per annum in the United States. Recent literature has placed the annual ISSHL incidence in the United States as 27 cases/100,000, with a pediatric incidence of 11 cases/100,000. Other studies report that the incidence is increasing (160/100,000), especially in the elderly (77/100,000), and conclude that ISSHL is no longer rare. In 1984, Byl reviewed the literature and found the mean age of ISSHL presentation to be 46-49 years, with variation of incidence with age and an equal gender distribution. The presentation of ISSHL does not appear to have seasonal variations, uneven distributions of presentation throughout the year, or an association with upper respiratory infections, either prior to or following symptom onset. The spontaneous recovery is currently thought to be 30-60%.</p>","PeriodicalId":49396,"journal":{"name":"Undersea and Hyperbaric Medicine","volume":"51 4","pages":"425-448"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143014876","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Introduction: Arterial vascular occlusion is a rare complication of dermal filler injection. This case report describes the successful use of hyperbaric oxygen therapy in a patient with vascular occlusion after a permanent dermal filler was injected.
Case report: A 51-year-old woman underwent an injection of non-resorbable polymethylmethacrylate microspheres into her nasolabial folds. Several hours later, she experienced dusky discoloration of the right nasolabial fold and surrounding livedo skin changes, consistent with vascular occlusion. Treatment with warm compresses and topical nitroglycerin was initiated, and the patient was referred for hyperbaric oxygen therapy. The tissue discoloration improved significantly after the administration of six hyperbaric treatments.
Discussion: While hyaluronidase is recognized as a treatment option for vascular occlusion associated with using temporary fillers containing hyaluronic acid, it may also be beneficial for patients who experience vascular occlusion after administration of permanent fillers. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy, which results in hyperoxygenation of ischemic tissue and mitigation of the associated inflammatory response, may also benefit patients who experience vascular occlusion after permanent filler injection.
Conclusions: Administration of hyaluronidase and hyperbaric oxygenation should be considered for patients who develop arterial occlusions after dermal filler placement, regardless of the type of injected filler.
{"title":"Hyperbaric oxygen therapy for treatment of vascular occlusion after permanent dermal filler injection.","authors":"Kelly Johnson-Arbor","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Arterial vascular occlusion is a rare complication of dermal filler injection. This case report describes the successful use of hyperbaric oxygen therapy in a patient with vascular occlusion after a permanent dermal filler was injected.</p><p><strong>Case report: </strong>A 51-year-old woman underwent an injection of non-resorbable polymethylmethacrylate microspheres into her nasolabial folds. Several hours later, she experienced dusky discoloration of the right nasolabial fold and surrounding livedo skin changes, consistent with vascular occlusion. Treatment with warm compresses and topical nitroglycerin was initiated, and the patient was referred for hyperbaric oxygen therapy. The tissue discoloration improved significantly after the administration of six hyperbaric treatments.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>While hyaluronidase is recognized as a treatment option for vascular occlusion associated with using temporary fillers containing hyaluronic acid, it may also be beneficial for patients who experience vascular occlusion after administration of permanent fillers. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy, which results in hyperoxygenation of ischemic tissue and mitigation of the associated inflammatory response, may also benefit patients who experience vascular occlusion after permanent filler injection.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Administration of hyaluronidase and hyperbaric oxygenation should be considered for patients who develop arterial occlusions after dermal filler placement, regardless of the type of injected filler.</p>","PeriodicalId":49396,"journal":{"name":"Undersea and Hyperbaric Medicine","volume":"51 4","pages":"403-406"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143014838","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
This report details a case study of a non-smoking 33-year-old female nurse who developed occupational asthma as an Inside Attendant (IA) in a hyperbaric chamber. The report analyzes the nurse's medical history, working environment, and potential causes. After beginning work in the hyperbaric chamber, an IA experienced respiratory symptoms, including coughing, wheezing, and fatigue. Her symptoms improved during a break attending a hyperbaric nursing certification program but returned when she resumed work in the IA hyperbaric chamber. Spirometry confirmed airflow obstruction, and the IA was subsequently diagnosed with occupational asthma. As a result, the IA had to terminate their employment in the hyperbaric chamber. The literature review indicates that diving and hyperbaric exposure can negatively affect respiratory function, particularly in individuals susceptible to respiratory issues. We emphasize the necessity for further research on the effects of hyperbaric exposure on the respiratory system of IAs.
{"title":"Does hyperbaric chamber attendance pose an asthma risk? Case report.","authors":"Levent Demir","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This report details a case study of a non-smoking 33-year-old female nurse who developed occupational asthma as an Inside Attendant (IA) in a hyperbaric chamber. The report analyzes the nurse's medical history, working environment, and potential causes. After beginning work in the hyperbaric chamber, an IA experienced respiratory symptoms, including coughing, wheezing, and fatigue. Her symptoms improved during a break attending a hyperbaric nursing certification program but returned when she resumed work in the IA hyperbaric chamber. Spirometry confirmed airflow obstruction, and the IA was subsequently diagnosed with occupational asthma. As a result, the IA had to terminate their employment in the hyperbaric chamber. The literature review indicates that diving and hyperbaric exposure can negatively affect respiratory function, particularly in individuals susceptible to respiratory issues. We emphasize the necessity for further research on the effects of hyperbaric exposure on the respiratory system of IAs.</p>","PeriodicalId":49396,"journal":{"name":"Undersea and Hyperbaric Medicine","volume":"51 4","pages":"387-391"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143014730","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Arieli has previously demonstrated that the exposure metric K could be used to predict pulmonary oxygen toxicity (POT) based on changes in Vital Capacity (VC). Our previous findings indicate that the Equivalent Surface Oxygen Time (ESOT) allows the estimation of POT without loss of accuracy compared to K. In this work, we have further investigated POT recovery. The K metric assumes that the recovery of POT is to be controlled by exposure to pO2. This results in a counterintuitively slow estimated recovery after exposure to low pO2. Similarly, K overestimates POT during intermittent hyperoxic exposures. We used results from previous studies to train the parameters of a new ESOT recovery model. The predicted recovery of ESOT (ESOTrec) after initial hyperoxic exposure (ESOTI) of duration texp (h) and recovery time t (h) can be calculated as ESOTrec=ESOTI · e-f with f=0.439 · t · 0.906texp. For intermittent exposures, the function ESOT(n)=(n · a · ln(b · n+1)+c) · texp · pO22.285 will approximate POT (ESOT(n)) after n sessions of pO2 (atm) for time texp (min) in each cycle. Parameters a, b, and c are specific for each cycling pattern. These ESOT functions will better predict the development of POT during intermittent hyperoxic exposures as well as recovery after a broader range of continuous hyperoxic exposures than K. We recommend limiting hyperoxic exposures in surface-oriented diving to ESOT=660, 500, and 450 for a maximum of one, five, and seven consecutive days, respectively. A minimum of 48 hours of recovery should follow. These limits can probably be relaxed for intermittent exposures.
{"title":"Recovery from pulmonary oxygen toxicity: a new (ESOT) model.","authors":"Jan Risberg, Pieter-Jan van Ooij, Lyubisa Mátity","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Arieli has previously demonstrated that the exposure metric K could be used to predict pulmonary oxygen toxicity (POT) based on changes in Vital Capacity (VC). Our previous findings indicate that the Equivalent Surface Oxygen Time (ESOT) allows the estimation of POT without loss of accuracy compared to K. In this work, we have further investigated POT recovery. The K metric assumes that the recovery of POT is to be controlled by exposure to pO<sub>2</sub>. This results in a counterintuitively slow estimated recovery after exposure to low pO<sub>2</sub>. Similarly, K overestimates POT during intermittent hyperoxic exposures. We used results from previous studies to train the parameters of a new ESOT recovery model. The predicted recovery of ESOT (ESOT<sub>rec</sub>) after initial hyperoxic exposure (ESOT<sub>I</sub>) of duration t<sub>exp</sub> (h) and recovery time t (h) can be calculated as ESOT<sub>rec</sub>=ESOT<sub>I</sub> · e<sup>-f</sup> with f=0.439 · t · 0.906<sup>t</sup><sub>exp</sub>. For intermittent exposures, the function ESOT(n)=(n · a · ln(b · n+1)+c) · t<sub>exp</sub> · pO<sub>2</sub><sup>2.285</sup> will approximate POT (ESOT(n)) after n sessions of pO<sub>2</sub> (atm) for time t<sub>exp</sub> (min) in each cycle. Parameters a, b, and c are specific for each cycling pattern. These ESOT functions will better predict the development of POT during intermittent hyperoxic exposures as well as recovery after a broader range of continuous hyperoxic exposures than K. We recommend limiting hyperoxic exposures in surface-oriented diving to ESOT=660, 500, and 450 for a maximum of one, five, and seven consecutive days, respectively. A minimum of 48 hours of recovery should follow. These limits can probably be relaxed for intermittent exposures.</p>","PeriodicalId":49396,"journal":{"name":"Undersea and Hyperbaric Medicine","volume":"51 4","pages":"407-423"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143014859","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Aleeza J Leder Macek, Ronald S Wang, Justin Cottrell, Emily Kay-Rivest, Sean O McMenomey, J Thomas Roland, Frank L Ross
Objective: To determine the outcomes of patients receiving hyperbaric oxygen therapy for sudden sensorineural hearing loss and the impact of patient comorbidities on outcomes.
Study design: Retrospective chart review.
Setting: Tertiary referral center.
Methods: All patients over 18 diagnosed with sudden sensorineural hearing loss between 2018 and 2021 who were treated with hyperbaric oxygen therapy were included. Demographic information, treatment regimens and duration, and audiometric and speech perception outcomes were recorded and analyzed.
Results: 19 patients were included. The median age was 45 years. 53% were female and 21% had pre- existing rheumatologic disorders. The mean duration between hearing loss onset and physician visits was 9.6 days. All patients received an oral steroid course, while 95% also received a median of 3 intratympanic steroid injections. Patients began hyperbaric oxygen therapy an average of 34.2 days after the hearing loss onset for an average of 13 sessions. No significant relationships were found between patient comorbidities and outcomes. Of those who reported clinical improvement, 57% demonstrated complete recovery per Siegel's criteria. There was significant improvement after hyperbaric oxygen therapy for pure tone averages (50.3dB vs. 36.0dB, p<0.01) and word discrimination scores (73% vs 79%, p<0.05) for all patients regardless of reported clinical improvement.
Conclusion: Hyperbaric oxygen therapy, as an adjunct to steroids, significantly improves recovery from sudden sensorineural hearing loss. The Charlson comorbidity index was not significantly associated with patient outcome, but patients with rheumatologic disorders were less likely to respond. Differentiating the natural history of the disease from hyperbaric oxygen therapy-associated improvements remains a challenge.
目的:探讨突发性感音神经性听力损失患者接受高压氧治疗的预后及患者合并症对预后的影响。研究设计:回顾性图表回顾。单位:三级转诊中心。方法:纳入2018年至2021年间所有18岁以上诊断为突发性感音神经性听力损失并接受高压氧治疗的患者。记录和分析人口统计信息、治疗方案和持续时间以及听力和言语感知结果。结果:共纳入19例患者。平均年龄为45岁。53%的患者为女性,21%的患者既往患有风湿病。听力损失发作和就诊之间的平均持续时间为9.6天。所有患者均接受口服类固醇疗程,而95%的患者也接受中位3次鼓室内类固醇注射。患者在听力损失发作后平均34.2天开始高压氧治疗,平均13次。未发现患者合并症与预后之间存在显著关系。在报告临床改善的患者中,57%的患者根据西格尔标准显示完全恢复。高压氧治疗对纯音平均听力有显著改善(50.3dB vs. 36.0dB)。结论:高压氧治疗作为类固醇的辅助治疗,可显著改善突发性感音神经性听力损失的恢复。Charlson合并症指数与患者预后无显著相关性,但风湿病患者不太可能有反应。区分疾病的自然历史与高压氧治疗相关的改善仍然是一个挑战。
{"title":"Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy for Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss - A Comorbidity Lens.","authors":"Aleeza J Leder Macek, Ronald S Wang, Justin Cottrell, Emily Kay-Rivest, Sean O McMenomey, J Thomas Roland, Frank L Ross","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the outcomes of patients receiving hyperbaric oxygen therapy for sudden sensorineural hearing loss and the impact of patient comorbidities on outcomes.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective chart review.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Tertiary referral center.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All patients over 18 diagnosed with sudden sensorineural hearing loss between 2018 and 2021 who were treated with hyperbaric oxygen therapy were included. Demographic information, treatment regimens and duration, and audiometric and speech perception outcomes were recorded and analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>19 patients were included. The median age was 45 years. 53% were female and 21% had pre- existing rheumatologic disorders. The mean duration between hearing loss onset and physician visits was 9.6 days. All patients received an oral steroid course, while 95% also received a median of 3 intratympanic steroid injections. Patients began hyperbaric oxygen therapy an average of 34.2 days after the hearing loss onset for an average of 13 sessions. No significant relationships were found between patient comorbidities and outcomes. Of those who reported clinical improvement, 57% demonstrated complete recovery per Siegel's criteria. There was significant improvement after hyperbaric oxygen therapy for pure tone averages (50.3dB vs. 36.0dB, p<0.01) and word discrimination scores (73% vs 79%, p<0.05) for all patients regardless of reported clinical improvement.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Hyperbaric oxygen therapy, as an adjunct to steroids, significantly improves recovery from sudden sensorineural hearing loss. The Charlson comorbidity index was not significantly associated with patient outcome, but patients with rheumatologic disorders were less likely to respond. Differentiating the natural history of the disease from hyperbaric oxygen therapy-associated improvements remains a challenge.</p>","PeriodicalId":49396,"journal":{"name":"Undersea and Hyperbaric Medicine","volume":"51 4","pages":"393-402"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143014744","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Edward O Tomoye, Carrie L Park, Lind Folke, Richard E Moon
The term "intracranial abscess" (ICA) includes cerebral abscess, subdural empyema, and epidural empyema, which share many diagnostic and therapeutic similarities and, frequently, very similar etiologies. Infection may occur and spread from a contiguous infection such as sinusitis, otitis, mastoiditis, or dental infection; hematogenous seeding; or cranial trauma. Brain abscess usually results from predisposing factors such as HIV infection, immunosuppressive drug treatment, surgery, adjacent infection (i.e., mastoiditis, sinusitis, dental infection), or systemic infection causing bacteremia. Approximately 30% to 50% of infections are caused by contiguous spread of local infections. Hematogenous spread is responsible in around a third of cases, with the mechanism for the remainder not identifiable.
{"title":"REPRINTED FROM THE 2023 HYPERBARIC INDICATIONS MANUAL 15<sup>th</sup> Edition:Intracranial Abscess.","authors":"Edward O Tomoye, Carrie L Park, Lind Folke, Richard E Moon","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The term \"intracranial abscess\" (ICA) includes cerebral abscess, subdural empyema, and epidural empyema, which share many diagnostic and therapeutic similarities and, frequently, very similar etiologies. Infection may occur and spread from a contiguous infection such as sinusitis, otitis, mastoiditis, or dental infection; hematogenous seeding; or cranial trauma. Brain abscess usually results from predisposing factors such as HIV infection, immunosuppressive drug treatment, surgery, adjacent infection (i.e., mastoiditis, sinusitis, dental infection), or systemic infection causing bacteremia. Approximately 30% to 50% of infections are caused by contiguous spread of local infections. Hematogenous spread is responsible in around a third of cases, with the mechanism for the remainder not identifiable.</p>","PeriodicalId":49396,"journal":{"name":"Undersea and Hyperbaric Medicine","volume":"51 4","pages":"449-455"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143014882","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Objective: To investigate the effect of 6 ATA air/ oxygen treatment scheme and 2.8 ATA oxygen inhalation scheme on cerebral gas embolism.
Methods: 29 patients with cerebral gas embolism admitted from January 2014 to June 2022 were retrospectively included. The patients were divided into 6 ATA air/ oxygen treatment scheme group (14 cases) and 2.8 ATA oxygen inhalation therapy scheme group (15 cases). Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) was used to evaluate the therapeutic effect before and after treatment. The effective standard of treatment: recovery of consciousness (GCS scores>8).
Results: There was no significant difference between two groups in terms of gender, age, cause of disease, time of onset and GCS score before treatment (P>0.05). There was not significant difference between two groups in terms of GCS score after 1 day and 1 week of treatment (P>0.05). After 1 week of treatment, 78.6% (11/14) of patients in the 6 ATA group and 80.0% (12/15) in the 2.8 ATA group improved.
Conclusion: The 2.8 ATA oxygen inhalation scheme can effectively treat cerebral gas embolism, and effect is similar to the 6 ATA air/ oxygen treatment scheme.
{"title":"A comparison of the treatment outcomes of cerebral gas embolism at 2.8 ATA in comparison with 6 ATA.","authors":"Bin Zhang, Hongjie Yi, Yue Jiang, Chenggang Zheng","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the effect of 6 ATA air/ oxygen treatment scheme and 2.8 ATA oxygen inhalation scheme on cerebral gas embolism.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>29 patients with cerebral gas embolism admitted from January 2014 to June 2022 were retrospectively included. The patients were divided into 6 ATA air/ oxygen treatment scheme group (14 cases) and 2.8 ATA oxygen inhalation therapy scheme group (15 cases). Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) was used to evaluate the therapeutic effect before and after treatment. The effective standard of treatment: recovery of consciousness (GCS scores>8).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was no significant difference between two groups in terms of gender, age, cause of disease, time of onset and GCS score before treatment (P>0.05). There was not significant difference between two groups in terms of GCS score after 1 day and 1 week of treatment (P>0.05). After 1 week of treatment, 78.6% (11/14) of patients in the 6 ATA group and 80.0% (12/15) in the 2.8 ATA group improved.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The 2.8 ATA oxygen inhalation scheme can effectively treat cerebral gas embolism, and effect is similar to the 6 ATA air/ oxygen treatment scheme.</p>","PeriodicalId":49396,"journal":{"name":"Undersea and Hyperbaric Medicine","volume":"51 4","pages":"341-346"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143014726","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Bernardo N Antunes, Daniel C M Müller, Vanessa Milech, Pamela Caye, Emanuelle B Degregori, Daniel Vargas, Rainer S Reinstein, Maurício V Brun
The assessment of rectal temperature and behavior is an important parameter in all patients for whom hyperbaric oxygen (HBO2) therapy is used. The study aims to verify if there is less reduction in body temperature after HBO2 therapy in restless patients and their behavior during the therapeutic session. Clinical data from 217 HBO2 therapy sessions with 2 to 2,5 atmospheres absolute (ATA) were reviewed under therapy protocols of 30 (P1) or 45 (P2) minutes, covering 29 canines and 13 felines. Behavioral data, initial rectal temperature (iRT), final (fRT), and variation between them (RTv) of each patient were recorded. Parameters of oxygen concentration, humidity, temperature, and chamber flow rate were also recorded. Three of 217 patients experienced major adverse effects (seizure and auto-trauma). 144/217 HBO2 therapy session records were selected for statistical analysis. In P1 sessions, 33.3% of the canine and 33.3% of the feline patients were restless. In P2 sessions, 40.7% of the canine and 28.1% of the feline patients were restless. The study did not observe a correlation between vRT and patients' behavior (p> 0.089) or differences in vRT between quiet and restless patients. There was a difference between iRT and fRT only in canines submitted to P1 (p<0.001) and felines submitted to P2 (p<0.001). Older canine patients were more restless than young canine patients at P1 (p= 0.02). We conclude that there may be a reduction in the fRT of dogs and cats submitted to 2 ATA for 30 minutes and 2.5 ATA for 45 minutes, respectively.
{"title":"Behavior and changes in rectal temperature in dogs and cats undergoing hyperbaric oxygen therapy: clinical data review.","authors":"Bernardo N Antunes, Daniel C M Müller, Vanessa Milech, Pamela Caye, Emanuelle B Degregori, Daniel Vargas, Rainer S Reinstein, Maurício V Brun","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The assessment of rectal temperature and behavior is an important parameter in all patients for whom hyperbaric oxygen (HBO<sub>2</sub>) therapy is used. The study aims to verify if there is less reduction in body temperature after HBO<sub>2</sub> therapy in restless patients and their behavior during the therapeutic session. Clinical data from 217 HBO<sub>2</sub> therapy sessions with 2 to 2,5 atmospheres absolute (ATA) were reviewed under therapy protocols of 30 (P1) or 45 (P2) minutes, covering 29 canines and 13 felines. Behavioral data, initial rectal temperature (iRT), final (fRT), and variation between them (RTv) of each patient were recorded. Parameters of oxygen concentration, humidity, temperature, and chamber flow rate were also recorded. Three of 217 patients experienced major adverse effects (seizure and auto-trauma). 144/217 HBO<sub>2</sub> therapy session records were selected for statistical analysis. In P1 sessions, 33.3% of the canine and 33.3% of the feline patients were restless. In P2 sessions, 40.7% of the canine and 28.1% of the feline patients were restless. The study did not observe a correlation between vRT and patients' behavior (p> 0.089) or differences in vRT between quiet and restless patients. There was a difference between iRT and fRT only in canines submitted to P1 (p<0.001) and felines submitted to P2 (p<0.001). Older canine patients were more restless than young canine patients at P1 (p= 0.02). We conclude that there may be a reduction in the fRT of dogs and cats submitted to 2 ATA for 30 minutes and 2.5 ATA for 45 minutes, respectively.</p>","PeriodicalId":49396,"journal":{"name":"Undersea and Hyperbaric Medicine","volume":"51 4","pages":"361-367"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143014727","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Nicholas C Bartlett, Matthew S Makowski, Mary C Ellis, Michael J Natoli, Grace H Maggiore, Mary C Wright, Bruce J Derrick, Richard E Moon
Introduction: Submersion results in blood redistribution into the pulmonary circulation, causing changes in pulmonary compliance and increased cardiac preload. Few studies have compared incremental exercise to exhaustion (VO2 max testing) in a dry environment with exercise underwater. We hypothesized that the physiological effects of submersion would result in lower heart rate (HR), minute ventilation (VE), and peak oxygen uptake (VO2 peak) compared with dry conditions.
Methods: Fourteen male and four female volunteers completed two VO2 peak testing sessions with approximately two hours between trials: first in the dry laboratory on a cycle ergometer and second while fully submersed in a prone position with zero static lung load. HR was monitored via ECG, and inspiratory and expiratory gas compositions were recorded using a metabolic cart. The tests were terminated once the subject reached exhaustion.
Results: Absolute VO2 peak was lower in the submersed VO2 max trial (37.1 ± 7.0 mL•kg-1•min-1) compared with dry exercise (45.8 ± 8.9 mL•kg-1•min-1) p < 0.001. HR and VE were also lower in the submersed trial.
Conclusions: VO2 peak while submersed is reduced relative to dry VO2 peak, which may be partly due to a decrease in heart rate and a reduction in VE.
{"title":"Effects of submersion on VO<sub>2</sub>: comparing maximum aerobic exertion on land and underwater.","authors":"Nicholas C Bartlett, Matthew S Makowski, Mary C Ellis, Michael J Natoli, Grace H Maggiore, Mary C Wright, Bruce J Derrick, Richard E Moon","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Submersion results in blood redistribution into the pulmonary circulation, causing changes in pulmonary compliance and increased cardiac preload. Few studies have compared incremental exercise to exhaustion (VO<sub>2</sub> max testing) in a dry environment with exercise underwater. We hypothesized that the physiological effects of submersion would result in lower heart rate (HR), minute ventilation (V<sub>E</sub>), and peak oxygen uptake (VO<sub>2</sub> peak) compared with dry conditions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fourteen male and four female volunteers completed two VO<sub>2</sub> peak testing sessions with approximately two hours between trials: first in the dry laboratory on a cycle ergometer and second while fully submersed in a prone position with zero static lung load. HR was monitored via ECG, and inspiratory and expiratory gas compositions were recorded using a metabolic cart. The tests were terminated once the subject reached exhaustion.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Absolute VO<sub>2</sub> peak was lower in the submersed VO<sub>2</sub> max trial (37.1 ± 7.0 mL•kg<sup>-1</sup>•min<sup>-1</sup>) compared with dry exercise (45.8 ± 8.9 mL•kg<sup>-1</sup>•min<sup>-1</sup>) p < 0.001. HR and V<sub>E</sub> were also lower in the submersed trial.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>VO<sub>2</sub> peak while submersed is reduced relative to dry VO<sub>2</sub> peak, which may be partly due to a decrease in heart rate and a reduction in V<sub>E</sub>.</p>","PeriodicalId":49396,"journal":{"name":"Undersea and Hyperbaric Medicine","volume":"51 3","pages":"197-211"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142330975","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Despite established exposure limits and safety standards, and the availability of carbon monoxide (CO) alarms, each year an estimated 50,000 people in the United States visit emergency departments for CO poisoning. Carbon monoxide poisoning can occur from brief exposures to high levels of CO or from longer exposures to lower levels. If the CO exposure is sufficiently high, unconsciousness and death occur quickly, and without symptoms. With non-lethal exposures to CO, common symptoms include headaches, nausea and vomiting, dizziness, general malaise, and altered mental status. Some patients may have chest pain, shortness of breath, and myocardial ischemia, and may require mechanical ventilation and treatment of shock. Individuals poisoned by CO often develop brain injury. As with brain injury from non- CO causes such as traumatic brain injury, the clinical expression of brain injury caused by CO poisoning includes the domains of cognition, affect, neurological, and somatic. Common problems are neurological: imbalance, motor weakness, neuropathies, hearing loss, tinnitus, Parkinson's-like syndrome, vestibular, gaze, auditory processing, cognitive, anxiety and depression, posttraumatic stress, personality change, persistent headaches, dizziness, sleep problems, and others. In addition, some will have cardiac or other problems. While breathing oxygen hastens the removal of carboxyhemoglobin (COHb), hyperbaric oxygen (HBO2) hastens COHb elimination and favorably modulates inflammatory processes instigated by CO poisoning, an effect not observed with breathing normobaric oxygen. Hyperbaric oxygen improves mitochondrial function, inhibits lipid peroxidation transiently, impairs leukocyte adhesion to injured microvasculature, and reduces brain inflammation caused by CO-induced adduct formation of myelin basic protein. Based upon supportive randomized clinical trials in humans and considerable evidence from animal studies, HBO2 should be considered for all cases of acute symptomatic CO poisoning. Hyperbaric oxygen is indicated for CO poisoning complicated by cyanide poisoning, often concomitantly with smoke inhalation.
尽管已经制定了一氧化碳接触限值和安全标准,而且一氧化碳(CO)报警器也已投入使用,但美国每年估计仍有 50,000 人因一氧化碳中毒而到急诊室就诊。一氧化碳中毒可能发生在短时间接触高浓度 CO 或长时间接触低浓度 CO 的情况下。如果接触的一氧化碳浓度足够高,很快就会失去知觉并死亡,而且没有任何症状。在接触一氧化碳不致命的情况下,常见症状包括头痛、恶心和呕吐、头晕、全身不适和精神状态改变。一些患者可能会出现胸痛、呼吸急促和心肌缺血,可能需要机械通气和休克治疗。一氧化碳中毒者通常会出现脑损伤。与创伤性脑损伤等非一氧化碳引起的脑损伤一样,一氧化碳中毒导致的脑损伤的临床表现包括认知、情感、神经和躯体等领域。常见的问题有神经系统问题:失衡、运动无力、神经病变、听力下降、耳鸣、帕金森样综合征、前庭、凝视、听觉处理、认知、焦虑和抑郁、创伤后应激、性格改变、持续性头痛、头晕、睡眠问题等。此外,有些人会出现心脏或其他问题。呼吸氧气可加速碳氧血红蛋白(COHb)的清除,而高压氧(HBO2)则可加速碳氧血红蛋白的清除,并对一氧化碳中毒引发的炎症过程产生有利的调节作用,这是呼吸常压氧所无法观察到的效果。高压氧可改善线粒体功能,短暂抑制脂质过氧化反应,降低白细胞对受损微血管的粘附性,并减轻因 CO 诱导的髓鞘碱性蛋白加合物形成而引起的脑部炎症。根据人体随机临床试验的支持性结果和动物实验的大量证据,所有急性症状性一氧化碳中毒病例都应考虑使用高压氧治疗。高压氧适用于并发氰化物中毒的一氧化碳中毒,通常与烟雾吸入同时进行。
{"title":"Carbon Monoxide Poisoning (Reprinted from the 2023 Hyperbaric Indications Manual 15<sup>th</sup> edition).","authors":"Lindell K Weaver","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Despite established exposure limits and safety standards, and the availability of carbon monoxide (CO) alarms, each year an estimated 50,000 people in the United States visit emergency departments for CO poisoning. Carbon monoxide poisoning can occur from brief exposures to high levels of CO or from longer exposures to lower levels. If the CO exposure is sufficiently high, unconsciousness and death occur quickly, and without symptoms. With non-lethal exposures to CO, common symptoms include headaches, nausea and vomiting, dizziness, general malaise, and altered mental status. Some patients may have chest pain, shortness of breath, and myocardial ischemia, and may require mechanical ventilation and treatment of shock. Individuals poisoned by CO often develop brain injury. As with brain injury from non- CO causes such as traumatic brain injury, the clinical expression of brain injury caused by CO poisoning includes the domains of cognition, affect, neurological, and somatic. Common problems are neurological: imbalance, motor weakness, neuropathies, hearing loss, tinnitus, Parkinson's-like syndrome, vestibular, gaze, auditory processing, cognitive, anxiety and depression, posttraumatic stress, personality change, persistent headaches, dizziness, sleep problems, and others. In addition, some will have cardiac or other problems. While breathing oxygen hastens the removal of carboxyhemoglobin (COHb), hyperbaric oxygen (HBO<sub>2</sub>) hastens COHb elimination and favorably modulates inflammatory processes instigated by CO poisoning, an effect not observed with breathing normobaric oxygen. Hyperbaric oxygen improves mitochondrial function, inhibits lipid peroxidation transiently, impairs leukocyte adhesion to injured microvasculature, and reduces brain inflammation caused by CO-induced adduct formation of myelin basic protein. Based upon supportive randomized clinical trials in humans and considerable evidence from animal studies, HBO<sub>2</sub> should be considered for all cases of acute symptomatic CO poisoning. Hyperbaric oxygen is indicated for CO poisoning complicated by cyanide poisoning, often concomitantly with smoke inhalation.</p>","PeriodicalId":49396,"journal":{"name":"Undersea and Hyperbaric Medicine","volume":"51 3","pages":"253-276"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142330965","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}