首页 > 最新文献

Scandinavian Journal of Surgery最新文献

英文 中文
Non-cosmetic use of botulinum toxin in surgical conditions. 肉毒杆菌毒素在外科手术中的非美容用途。
IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q1 SURGERY Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-24 DOI: 10.1177/14574969241277614
Line Marker, Peter Toquer, John Thomas Helgstrand, Frederik Helgstrand

Botulinum toxin (BTX) is a neurotoxin that has an ability to create a fully reversible relaxation of muscles through decreased release of acethylcholin. It also has an effect on the cholinergic autoimmune nervous system, and it can reduce pain sensitization. BTX is widely used in cosmetic treatments. In recent years, BTX has increasingly been used to treat several medical and surgical conditions. In many cases, this is despite weak evidence and without approval from the European Medicine Agency (EMA). This narrative review describes how BTX is used in the different surgical specialties and provides a brief overview of the use of BTX for non-cosmetic surgical conditions.

肉毒杆菌毒素(BTX)是一种神经毒素,能够通过减少乙酰胆碱的释放,使肌肉产生完全可逆的松弛。它还对胆碱能自身免疫神经系统有影响,并能降低痛觉敏感性。BTX 被广泛用于美容治疗。近年来,BTX 越来越多地用于治疗一些内科和外科疾病。在许多情况下,尽管证据不足,也未获得欧洲药品管理局(EMA)的批准。本综述介绍了 BTX 在不同外科专科中的应用,并简要概述了 BTX 在非美容外科疾病中的应用。
{"title":"Non-cosmetic use of botulinum toxin in surgical conditions.","authors":"Line Marker, Peter Toquer, John Thomas Helgstrand, Frederik Helgstrand","doi":"10.1177/14574969241277614","DOIUrl":"10.1177/14574969241277614","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Botulinum toxin (BTX) is a neurotoxin that has an ability to create a fully reversible relaxation of muscles through decreased release of acethylcholin. It also has an effect on the cholinergic autoimmune nervous system, and it can reduce pain sensitization. BTX is widely used in cosmetic treatments. In recent years, BTX has increasingly been used to treat several medical and surgical conditions. In many cases, this is despite weak evidence and without approval from the European Medicine Agency (EMA). This narrative review describes how BTX is used in the different surgical specialties and provides a brief overview of the use of BTX for non-cosmetic surgical conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":49566,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"324-331"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142308915","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
16-year outcomes of blunt thoracic aortic injury treated with thoracic endovascular aortic repair: A single-institution experience. 使用胸腔内血管主动脉修补术治疗钝性胸主动脉损伤的 16 年疗效:单一机构的经验。
IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q1 SURGERY Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-25 DOI: 10.1177/14574969241255242
Tasnia Rahman, Lauri M Halonen, Lauri Handolin, Tatu Juvonen, Mikko Jormalainen, Sebastian Dahlbacka

Background: Blunt thoracic aortic injury (BTAI) is associated with considerable mortality and morbidity. Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) has essentially replaced open aortic repair (OAR) with superior outcome. The objective of this study was to evaluate the early and intermediate-term outcomes in patients sustaining BTAI treated with TEVAR, and to evaluate the prevalence and impact of left subclavian artery (LSA) coverage.

Methods: This retrospective analysis includes patients undergoing TEVAR for BTAI between February 2006 and December 2022 at the Helsinki University Hospital, Finland. The primary endpoints were 30-day and 2-year mortality, technical success of stent-graft system deployment, and procedural and device-related complications. The secondary endpoints pertained to reintervention events: conversion to OAR, re-TEVAR, any endovascular/surgical reinterventions for optimal stent-graft function, or any reinterventions during follow-up.

Results: A total of 38 consecutive BTAI patients treated with TEVAR were included in the analyses. Median patient age was 45.5 years (range, 15-79) and 66% were male. The median follow-up period was 39 months. Technical success was 100%, 30-day mortality was 0%, and 2-year mortality was 11% in the study cohort. Coverage of LSA without revascularization (13/18) resulted in one postoperative nondisabling stroke (1/13), no paraplegia, and one had ischemic left arm findings (1/13). Only one patient required reintervention (LSA embolization; 1/38).

Conclusion: In this institutional series, we provide further evidence in favor of TEVAR for BTAI treatment. We demonstrated that TEVAR is linked to highly favorable outcomes in the short and intermediate term, and coverage of LSA without revascularization was quite well tolerated.

背景:钝性胸主动脉损伤(BTAI)与相当高的死亡率和发病率有关。胸腔内血管主动脉修补术(TEVAR)基本上取代了开放性主动脉修补术(OAR),并取得了良好的疗效。本研究旨在评估接受 TEVAR 治疗的 BTAI 患者的早期和中期预后,并评估左锁骨下动脉(LSA)覆盖的发生率和影响:这项回顾性分析包括2006年2月至2022年12月期间在芬兰赫尔辛基大学医院接受TEVAR治疗的BTAI患者。主要终点为30天和2年死亡率、支架-移植物系统部署的技术成功率以及手术和设备相关并发症。次要终点与再干预事件有关:转为OAR、再TEVAR、为优化支架移植物功能而进行的任何血管内/外科再干预或随访期间的任何再干预:共有38例连续接受TEVAR治疗的BTAI患者纳入分析。患者年龄中位数为45.5岁(15-79岁),66%为男性。中位随访时间为 39 个月。研究队列的技术成功率为100%,30天死亡率为0%,2年死亡率为11%。在未进行血管再通的情况下覆盖 LSA(13/18),术后出现了一次非致残性中风(1/13),没有出现截瘫,一人出现左臂缺血(1/13)。只有一名患者需要再次干预(LSA 栓塞,1/38):在这一机构系列中,我们提供了更多支持 TEVAR 治疗 BTAI 的证据。我们证明,TEVAR 在短期和中期都能带来非常好的疗效,而且在不进行血管再通的情况下覆盖 LSA 的耐受性非常好。
{"title":"16-year outcomes of blunt thoracic aortic injury treated with thoracic endovascular aortic repair: A single-institution experience.","authors":"Tasnia Rahman, Lauri M Halonen, Lauri Handolin, Tatu Juvonen, Mikko Jormalainen, Sebastian Dahlbacka","doi":"10.1177/14574969241255242","DOIUrl":"10.1177/14574969241255242","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Blunt thoracic aortic injury (BTAI) is associated with considerable mortality and morbidity. Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) has essentially replaced open aortic repair (OAR) with superior outcome. The objective of this study was to evaluate the early and intermediate-term outcomes in patients sustaining BTAI treated with TEVAR, and to evaluate the prevalence and impact of left subclavian artery (LSA) coverage.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective analysis includes patients undergoing TEVAR for BTAI between February 2006 and December 2022 at the Helsinki University Hospital, Finland. The primary endpoints were 30-day and 2-year mortality, technical success of stent-graft system deployment, and procedural and device-related complications. The secondary endpoints pertained to reintervention events: conversion to OAR, re-TEVAR, any endovascular/surgical reinterventions for optimal stent-graft function, or any reinterventions during follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 38 consecutive BTAI patients treated with TEVAR were included in the analyses. Median patient age was 45.5 years (range, 15-79) and 66% were male. The median follow-up period was 39 months. Technical success was 100%, 30-day mortality was 0%, and 2-year mortality was 11% in the study cohort. Coverage of LSA without revascularization (13/18) resulted in one postoperative nondisabling stroke (1/13), no paraplegia, and one had ischemic left arm findings (1/13). Only one patient required reintervention (LSA embolization; 1/38).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this institutional series, we provide further evidence in favor of TEVAR for BTAI treatment. We demonstrated that TEVAR is linked to highly favorable outcomes in the short and intermediate term, and coverage of LSA without revascularization was quite well tolerated.</p>","PeriodicalId":49566,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"282-292"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141097185","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Preoperatively suspected gallbladder cancer improves survival compared with incidental gallbladder cancer in pT3 patients. 在 pT3 患者中,与偶然发现的胆囊癌相比,术前怀疑为胆囊癌的患者生存率更高。
IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q1 SURGERY Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-26 DOI: 10.1177/14574969241263539
Carolina Muszynska, Linda Lundgren, Helene Jacobsson, Per Sandström, Bodil Andersson

Background: The aim was to compare survival for incidental gallbladder cancer (IGBC), respectively, preoperatively suspected gallbladder cancer (GBC), subjected to surgery for different pathological tumour (pT) stages and in different treatment groups in a national cohort.

Methods: Data were collected and crosslinked from two national quality registers, SweLiv (2009-2019) and GallRiks (2009-2016). Survival was estimated using Kaplan-Meier analysis. The log-rank test and Cox regression analyses were used to compare groups.

Results: In total, 466 IGBC patients, including 225 who only underwent simple cholecystectomy (SC), and 477 GBC patients were included. Most patients were female, with small differences in mean age between groups. In all IGBC patients compared with GBC patients, an improved 5-year overall survival in pT3 GBC undergoing surgery (GBC 13% vs all IGBC 8%, p < 0.001), was seen. GBC was shown to be an independent predictor for improved survival in pT3 patients (hazard ratio (HR): 0.6; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.4-0.8, p< 0.001). In addition, in GBC with curative reresection compared with IGBC SC and IGBC with curative resection, an improved 5-year overall survival in pT3 GBC was shown (GBC 20% vs all IGBC 10%, p < 0.001). GBC was an independent predictor for improved survival in pT3 patients with curative resection (HR: 0.4; 95% CI: 0.3-0.7, p< 0.001).

Conclusions: GBC was shown to be an independent predictor for improved survival in pT3 patients, and patients with GBC may benefit from one-stage resection. It is, therefore, reasonable to recommend that radiological suspicion of malignancy should be evaluated at a liver tumour centre to optimize patient outcomes.

背景:目的是比较全国队列中不同病理肿瘤(pT)分期和不同治疗组的偶发胆囊癌(IGBC)和术前疑似胆囊癌(GBC)的手术生存率:方法:从SweLiv(2009-2019年)和GallRiks(2009-2016年)两个国家质量登记册中收集数据并进行交叉链接。采用 Kaplan-Meier 分析法估算生存率。采用对数秩检验和 Cox 回归分析对各组进行比较:共纳入466例IGBC患者(包括225例仅接受单纯胆囊切除术(SC)的患者)和477例GBC患者。大多数患者为女性,组间平均年龄差异较小。在所有 IGBC 患者与 GBC 患者中,接受手术治疗的 pT3 GBC 患者的 5 年总生存率有所提高(GBC 13% 与所有 IGBC 8%,P 0.001)。此外,与接受根治性切除术的 IGBC SC 和 IGBC 相比,接受根治性切除术的 GBC 患者中 pT3 GBC 的 5 年总生存率有所提高(GBC 20% vs 所有 IGBC 10%,P 0.001):结论:研究表明,GBC 是改善 pT3 患者生存率的独立预测因素,GBC 患者可能从单期切除术中获益。因此,有理由建议应在肝脏肿瘤中心对放射学怀疑的恶性肿瘤进行评估,以优化患者的预后。
{"title":"Preoperatively suspected gallbladder cancer improves survival compared with incidental gallbladder cancer in pT3 patients.","authors":"Carolina Muszynska, Linda Lundgren, Helene Jacobsson, Per Sandström, Bodil Andersson","doi":"10.1177/14574969241263539","DOIUrl":"10.1177/14574969241263539","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The aim was to compare survival for incidental gallbladder cancer (IGBC), respectively, preoperatively suspected gallbladder cancer (GBC), subjected to surgery for different pathological tumour (pT) stages and in different treatment groups in a national cohort.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were collected and crosslinked from two national quality registers, SweLiv (2009-2019) and GallRiks (2009-2016). Survival was estimated using Kaplan-Meier analysis. The log-rank test and Cox regression analyses were used to compare groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 466 IGBC patients, including 225 who only underwent simple cholecystectomy (SC), and 477 GBC patients were included. Most patients were female, with small differences in mean age between groups. In all IGBC patients compared with GBC patients, an improved 5-year overall survival in pT3 GBC undergoing surgery (GBC 13% vs all IGBC 8%, <i>p</i> < 0.001), was seen. GBC was shown to be an independent predictor for improved survival in pT3 patients (hazard ratio (HR): 0.6; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.4-0.8, <i>p</i> <i><</i> 0.001). In addition, in GBC with curative reresection compared with IGBC SC and IGBC with curative resection, an improved 5-year overall survival in pT3 GBC was shown (GBC 20% vs all IGBC 10%, <i>p</i> < 0.001). GBC was an independent predictor for improved survival in pT3 patients with curative resection (HR: 0.4; 95% CI: 0.3-0.7, <i>p</i> <i><</i> 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>GBC was shown to be an independent predictor for improved survival in pT3 patients, and patients with GBC may benefit from one-stage resection. It is, therefore, reasonable to recommend that radiological suspicion of malignancy should be evaluated at a liver tumour centre to optimize patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":49566,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"314-323"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141767883","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Emergency surgery influences oncological outcome in small intestinal neuroendocrine tumors. 急诊手术影响小肠神经内分泌肿瘤的肿瘤学预后。
IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q1 SURGERY Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-04 DOI: 10.1177/14574969241271841
Frederike Butz, Leonie Supper, Lisa Reinhard, Agata Dukaczewska, Henning Jann, Uli Fehrenbach, Charlotte Friederike Müller-Debus, Tatiana Skachko, Johann Pratschke, Peter E Goretzki, Martina T Mogl, Eva M Dobrindt

Background and aims: Patients with small intestinal neuroendocrine tumors (siNETs) frequently present emergently due to bowel ischemia or bowel obstruction. The influence of emergency surgery on the prognosis of siNET remains controversial. The aim of this study was to investigate the association between type of presentation (emergency/elective) and oncological outcome.

Methods: Clinicopathological data of patients who underwent bowel resection and were treated due to siNET at the Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany were analyzed retrospectively.

Results: A total of 165 patients underwent bowel resection for siNET. Of these, 22.4% (n = 37) were emergency and 77.6% (n = 128) were elective procedures. A preoperative known diagnosis was less common in patients with emergency surgery (48.6% vs 85.2%; p < 0.001) and complete resections of all tumor manifestations were performed less often (32.4% vs 50.8%; p = 0.049), while more completion operations had to be performed (24.3% vs 11.1%; p = 0.049). Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) of emergently operated patients were reduced (5-year OS: 85.2% vs 89.5% (p = 0.023); 5-year PFS: 26.7% versus 52.5% (p = 0.018)). In addition, emergency surgery was negatively associated with OS after multivariable regression analysis.

Conclusion: Emergency surgery in siNET patients is associated with adverse oncological outcomes including shorter OS and PFS. Prevention of emergency conditions should be emphasized in advanced disease.

背景和目的:小肠神经内分泌肿瘤(siNET)患者常因肠道缺血或肠梗阻而急诊就诊。急诊手术对 siNET 预后的影响仍存在争议。本研究旨在探讨手术方式(急诊/择期)与肿瘤预后之间的关系:方法:回顾性分析在德国柏林夏里特大学接受肠切除术治疗的 siNET 患者的临床病理数据:结果:共有 165 名患者因 siNET 接受了肠道切除术。其中,22.4%(n = 37)为急诊手术,77.6%(n = 128)为择期手术。在急诊手术患者中,术前已知诊断的比例较低(48.6% 对 85.2%;P = 0.049),而必须进行完工手术的比例较高(24.3% 对 11.1%;P = 0.049)。急诊手术患者的总生存期(OS)和无进展生存期(PFS)均有所下降(5 年 OS:85.2%对89.5%(P = 0.023);5年无进展生存期:26.7%对52.5%(P = 0.018))。此外,经多变量回归分析,急诊手术与OS呈负相关:结论:siNET 患者的急诊手术与不良肿瘤预后有关,包括较短的 OS 和 PFS。结论:siNET 患者的急诊手术与不良的肿瘤预后有关,包括较短的 OS 和 PFS。
{"title":"Emergency surgery influences oncological outcome in small intestinal neuroendocrine tumors.","authors":"Frederike Butz, Leonie Supper, Lisa Reinhard, Agata Dukaczewska, Henning Jann, Uli Fehrenbach, Charlotte Friederike Müller-Debus, Tatiana Skachko, Johann Pratschke, Peter E Goretzki, Martina T Mogl, Eva M Dobrindt","doi":"10.1177/14574969241271841","DOIUrl":"10.1177/14574969241271841","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Patients with small intestinal neuroendocrine tumors (siNETs) frequently present emergently due to bowel ischemia or bowel obstruction. The influence of emergency surgery on the prognosis of siNET remains controversial. The aim of this study was to investigate the association between type of presentation (emergency/elective) and oncological outcome.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Clinicopathological data of patients who underwent bowel resection and were treated due to siNET at the Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany were analyzed retrospectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 165 patients underwent bowel resection for siNET. Of these, 22.4% (n = 37) were emergency and 77.6% (n = 128) were elective procedures. A preoperative known diagnosis was less common in patients with emergency surgery (48.6% vs 85.2%; <i>p</i> < 0.001) and complete resections of all tumor manifestations were performed less often (32.4% vs 50.8%; <i>p</i> = 0.049), while more completion operations had to be performed (24.3% vs 11.1%; <i>p</i> = 0.049). Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) of emergently operated patients were reduced (5-year OS: 85.2% vs 89.5% (<i>p</i> = 0.023); 5-year PFS: 26.7% versus 52.5% (<i>p</i> = 0.018)). In addition, emergency surgery was negatively associated with OS after multivariable regression analysis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Emergency surgery in siNET patients is associated with adverse oncological outcomes including shorter OS and PFS. Prevention of emergency conditions should be emphasized in advanced disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":49566,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"303-313"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142127161","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Spine injuries among severely injured trauma patients: A retrospective single-center cohort study. 严重创伤患者的脊柱损伤:一项回顾性单中心队列研究。
IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q1 SURGERY Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-27 DOI: 10.1177/14574969241271781
Henri Lassila, Mikko Heinänen, Joni Serlo, Tuomas Brinck

Backgrounds and aims: We aimed to determine the incidence and severity of spine injuries among severely injured trauma patients (Injury Severity Score (ISS)/New Injury Severity Score (NISS) > 15) treated in a single tertiary trauma center over 15 years. We also wanted to compare the demographics between patients with and without spine injuries and to determine the mortality of spine-injury patients.

Methods: Data from the years 2006-2020 from the Helsinki Trauma Registry (HTR), a local trauma registry of the trauma unit of the Helsinki University Hospital (HUH), were reviewed. We divided patients into two groups, namely those with traumatic spine injury (TSI) and those without traumatic spine injury (N-TSI). TSI patients were further subdivided into groups according to the level of injury (cervical, thoracolumbar, or multilevel) and the presence of neurological symptoms.

Results: We included 2529 patients: 1336 (53%) had a TSI and 1193 (47%) had N-TSI. TSI patients were injured more frequently by a high-fall mechanism (37% vs 21%, p < 0.001). Among TSI patients, 38% of high-fall injuries were self-inflicted. High falls, young age, and female gender were overrepresented in spine-injury patients with a self-inflicted injury mechanism. Cervical spine-injury patients were mostly elderly persons injured by a low-energy mechanism.

Conclusions: Unlike other severely injured trauma patients, severely injured trauma patients with spine injuries are more frequently injured by a high-fall mechanism and self-injury.

背景和目的:我们的目的是确定 15 年来在一家三级创伤中心接受治疗的严重创伤患者(损伤严重程度评分 (ISS)/ 新伤严重程度评分 (NISS) > 15)中脊柱损伤的发生率和严重程度。我们还希望比较脊柱损伤和非脊柱损伤患者的人口统计学特征,并确定脊柱损伤患者的死亡率:我们回顾了赫尔辛基创伤登记处(Helsinki Trauma Registry,HTR)2006-2020年的数据,该登记处是赫尔辛基大学医院(HUH)创伤科的地方创伤登记处。我们将患者分为两组,即有创伤性脊柱损伤(TSI)和无创伤性脊柱损伤(N-TSI)的患者。外伤性脊柱损伤患者又根据损伤程度(颈椎、胸腰椎或多级)和是否出现神经系统症状细分为不同的组别:我们共纳入了 2529 名患者:1336人(53%)为TSI患者,1193人(47%)为N-TSI患者。TSI患者更多地受到高处坠落机制的伤害(37% vs 21%,P 结论:TSI患者的神经系统症状与N-TSI患者相同:与其他严重受伤的创伤患者不同,脊柱严重受伤的创伤患者更常因高处坠落机制和自伤而受伤。
{"title":"Spine injuries among severely injured trauma patients: A retrospective single-center cohort study.","authors":"Henri Lassila, Mikko Heinänen, Joni Serlo, Tuomas Brinck","doi":"10.1177/14574969241271781","DOIUrl":"10.1177/14574969241271781","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Backgrounds and aims: </strong>We aimed to determine the incidence and severity of spine injuries among severely injured trauma patients (Injury Severity Score (ISS)/New Injury Severity Score (NISS) > 15) treated in a single tertiary trauma center over 15 years. We also wanted to compare the demographics between patients with and without spine injuries and to determine the mortality of spine-injury patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from the years 2006-2020 from the Helsinki Trauma Registry (HTR), a local trauma registry of the trauma unit of the Helsinki University Hospital (HUH), were reviewed. We divided patients into two groups, namely those with traumatic spine injury (TSI) and those without traumatic spine injury (N-TSI). TSI patients were further subdivided into groups according to the level of injury (cervical, thoracolumbar, or multilevel) and the presence of neurological symptoms.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 2529 patients: 1336 (53%) had a TSI and 1193 (47%) had N-TSI. TSI patients were injured more frequently by a high-fall mechanism (37% vs 21%, p < 0.001). Among TSI patients, 38% of high-fall injuries were self-inflicted. High falls, young age, and female gender were overrepresented in spine-injury patients with a self-inflicted injury mechanism. Cervical spine-injury patients were mostly elderly persons injured by a low-energy mechanism.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Unlike other severely injured trauma patients, severely injured trauma patients with spine injuries are more frequently injured by a high-fall mechanism and self-injury.</p>","PeriodicalId":49566,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"293-302"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142331058","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Academic surgery: Challenges and opportunities. 学术外科:挑战与机遇。
IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q1 SURGERY Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-23 DOI: 10.1177/14574969241263529
John-Peder Escobar Kvitting
{"title":"Academic surgery: Challenges and opportunities.","authors":"John-Peder Escobar Kvitting","doi":"10.1177/14574969241263529","DOIUrl":"10.1177/14574969241263529","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":49566,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"334-335"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141749453","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The impact of metastasectomy on survival of patients with synchronous metastatic renal cell cancer in Finland: A nationwide study. 在芬兰,转移灶切除术对同步转移性肾细胞癌患者生存期的影响:一项全国性研究。
IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q1 SURGERY Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-04 DOI: 10.1177/14574969241234485
Lauri Laru, Hanna Ronkainen, Pasi Ohtonen, Markku H Vaarala

Background and objective: Most of the studies on metastasectomy in renal cell cancer are based on metachronous, often oligometastatic disease. Prior data on the impact of metastasectomy in synchronous metastatic renal cell cancer (mRCC) is, however, very scarce. We aimed to investigate the role of complete and incomplete metastasectomy in a large, nationwide patient population.

Methods: We analyzed nationwide data, including all synchronous mRCC cases in Finland diagnosed during a 6-year period identified from the Finnish Cancer Registry, and complemented with patient records from the treating hospitals. We only included the patients who underwent removal of the primary tumor by nephrectomy. We performed univariate and multivariable adjusted analysis to identify the effect of metastasectomy on overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS).

Results: We included 483 patients with synchronous mRCC. Overall, 57 patients underwent complete and 96 incomplete metastasectomy, while 330 patients had no metastasectomy. The median OS was 17.9 and CSS 17.2 months for all patients. The median OS and the median CSS were 59.3 and 60.8 months for the complete, 21.9 and 25.1 for the incomplete, and 14.5 and 14.8 months for the no metastasectomy groups (p < 0.001 for differences). In both applied multivariable statistical models, the OS and CSS benefit from complete metastasectomy remained significant (hazard ratios (HRs) varied between 0.42 and 0.54, p < 0.001) compared with the no metastasectomy group. However, there was no improvement in survival estimates in the incomplete metastasectomy group compared with the no metastasectomy group (HRs varied between 1.04 and 1.10, p > 0.40).

Conclusions: Complete metastasectomy, when possible, can be considered as a treatment option for selected patients with synchronous mRCC who are fit for surgery. By contrast, we found no survival benefit from an incomplete metastasectomy suggesting that such procedures should not be performed for these patients.

背景和目的:有关肾细胞癌转移灶切除术的大多数研究都是基于转移性疾病,通常是少转移性疾病。然而,关于转移灶切除术对同步转移性肾细胞癌(mRCC)影响的现有数据却非常稀少。我们的目的是在一个全国性的大型患者群体中调查完全和不完全转移切除术的作用:我们分析了全国范围内的数据,包括芬兰癌症登记处在6年期间诊断出的所有同步mRCC病例,并以治疗医院的患者记录作为补充。我们只纳入了通过肾切除术切除原发肿瘤的患者。我们进行了单变量和多变量调整分析,以确定转移瘤切除术对总生存期(OS)和癌症特异性生存期(CSS)的影响:我们共纳入了 483 例同步 mRCC 患者。结果:我们纳入了483例同步mRCC患者,其中57例患者接受了完全转移切除术,96例患者接受了不完全转移切除术,330例患者未接受转移切除术。所有患者的中位OS为17.9个月,CSS为17.2个月。完全转移切除组的中位OS和中位CSS分别为59.3个月和60.8个月,不完全转移切除组的中位OS和中位CSS分别为21.9个月和25.1个月,无转移切除组的中位OS和中位CSS分别为14.5个月和14.8个月(P P > 0.40):完全转移灶切除术在可能的情况下可被视为适合手术的同步mRCC患者的一种治疗选择。相比之下,我们发现不完全转移灶切除术对患者的生存没有任何益处,这表明这些患者不应接受此类手术。
{"title":"The impact of metastasectomy on survival of patients with synchronous metastatic renal cell cancer in Finland: A nationwide study.","authors":"Lauri Laru, Hanna Ronkainen, Pasi Ohtonen, Markku H Vaarala","doi":"10.1177/14574969241234485","DOIUrl":"10.1177/14574969241234485","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Most of the studies on metastasectomy in renal cell cancer are based on metachronous, often oligometastatic disease. Prior data on the impact of metastasectomy in synchronous metastatic renal cell cancer (mRCC) is, however, very scarce. We aimed to investigate the role of complete and incomplete metastasectomy in a large, nationwide patient population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed nationwide data, including all synchronous mRCC cases in Finland diagnosed during a 6-year period identified from the Finnish Cancer Registry, and complemented with patient records from the treating hospitals. We only included the patients who underwent removal of the primary tumor by nephrectomy. We performed univariate and multivariable adjusted analysis to identify the effect of metastasectomy on overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 483 patients with synchronous mRCC. Overall, 57 patients underwent complete and 96 incomplete metastasectomy, while 330 patients had no metastasectomy. The median OS was 17.9 and CSS 17.2 months for all patients. The median OS and the median CSS were 59.3 and 60.8 months for the complete, 21.9 and 25.1 for the incomplete, and 14.5 and 14.8 months for the no metastasectomy groups (<i>p</i> < 0.001 for differences). In both applied multivariable statistical models, the OS and CSS benefit from complete metastasectomy remained significant (hazard ratios (HRs) varied between 0.42 and 0.54, <i>p</i> < 0.001) compared with the no metastasectomy group. However, there was no improvement in survival estimates in the incomplete metastasectomy group compared with the no metastasectomy group (HRs varied between 1.04 and 1.10, <i>p</i> > 0.40).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Complete metastasectomy, when possible, can be considered as a treatment option for selected patients with synchronous mRCC who are fit for surgery. By contrast, we found no survival benefit from an incomplete metastasectomy suggesting that such procedures should not be performed for these patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":49566,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"219-228"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140023108","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Diverting ostomy prior to neoadjuvant treatment in rectal cancer should be used selectively: A retrospective single-center cohort study. 直肠癌新辅助治疗前应选择性使用分流造口术:一项回顾性单中心队列研究。
IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q1 SURGERY Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-15 DOI: 10.1177/14574969241252481
Valentinus Valdimarsson, Eihab Munshi, Marie-Louise Lydrup, Henrik Jutesten, Carolina Samuelsson, Pamela Buchwald

Background: Rectal cancer patients commonly benefit from neoadjuvant therapy before resection surgery. For these patients, an elective ostomy diversion is frequently considered, despite the absence of conclusive evidence when a diversion is advantageous. This is a retrospective observational single-center study on a 4-year consecutive rectal cancer cohort undergoing neoadjuvant therapy, aiming at improving the understanding of risks and benefits associated with ostomy diversion.

Material and method: Baseline characteristics, tumor-specific data, clinical events, and outcomes were collected using the Swedish Colorectal Cancer Registry and medical records.

Results: Thirty-two (30.2%) of the 106 included patients presented with endoscopic impassable tumors at diagnosis, of which 18 (56.2%) had diverting ostomy. Three out of 14 with impassable tumor and no diversion developed a bowel obstruction. None of the patients with an endoscopically passable tumor at diagnosis (n = 74) experienced a bowel obstruction. The elective diversions (n = 40) were not associated with serious complications (Clavien-Dindo grade ⩾ 3b). Patients with a diverting ostomy (n = 30) had similar time intervals from diagnosis to neoadjuvant treatment and to definite tumor resection as those without diversion but experienced more complex primary tumor resections in terms of blood loss and operation time.

Conclusion: An elective diverting ostomy is a relatively safe procedure in rectal cancer patients requiring neoadjuvant therapy. More than one out of five non-diverted patients with endoscopically impassable rectal tumors developed bowel obstruction and would potentially have benefited from an elective diversion.

背景:直肠癌患者通常可从切除手术前的新辅助治疗中获益。对于这些患者,尽管目前尚无确凿证据表明转移造口对他们有利,但他们经常会考虑选择性转移造口。这是一项单中心回顾性观察研究,研究对象是接受新辅助治疗的4年连续直肠癌队列,旨在加深对造口改道相关风险和益处的理解:通过瑞典结直肠癌登记处和医疗记录收集基线特征、肿瘤特异性数据、临床事件和结果:结果:106 例患者中有 32 例(30.2%)在确诊时患有内镜下无法通过的肿瘤,其中 18 例(56.2%)进行了造口转流。14名肿瘤无法通过且未进行分流的患者中有3名出现了肠梗阻。诊断时内镜下可通过肿瘤的患者(n = 74)无一发生肠梗阻。选择性转流(n = 40)与严重并发症(Clavien-Dindo ⩾3b级)无关。从诊断到接受新辅助治疗和明确的肿瘤切除术,使用分流造口术的患者(30 人)与未使用分流造口术的患者时间间隔相似,但就失血量和手术时间而言,原发性肿瘤切除术更为复杂:结论:对于需要接受新辅助治疗的直肠癌患者而言,选择性分流造口术是一种相对安全的手术。五分之一以上内镜下无法通过直肠肿瘤的非转流患者会出现肠梗阻,选择性转流手术可能会使他们受益。
{"title":"Diverting ostomy prior to neoadjuvant treatment in rectal cancer should be used selectively: A retrospective single-center cohort study.","authors":"Valentinus Valdimarsson, Eihab Munshi, Marie-Louise Lydrup, Henrik Jutesten, Carolina Samuelsson, Pamela Buchwald","doi":"10.1177/14574969241252481","DOIUrl":"10.1177/14574969241252481","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Rectal cancer patients commonly benefit from neoadjuvant therapy before resection surgery. For these patients, an elective ostomy diversion is frequently considered, despite the absence of conclusive evidence when a diversion is advantageous. This is a retrospective observational single-center study on a 4-year consecutive rectal cancer cohort undergoing neoadjuvant therapy, aiming at improving the understanding of risks and benefits associated with ostomy diversion.</p><p><strong>Material and method: </strong>Baseline characteristics, tumor-specific data, clinical events, and outcomes were collected using the Swedish Colorectal Cancer Registry and medical records.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-two (30.2%) of the 106 included patients presented with endoscopic impassable tumors at diagnosis, of which 18 (56.2%) had diverting ostomy. Three out of 14 with impassable tumor and no diversion developed a bowel obstruction. None of the patients with an endoscopically passable tumor at diagnosis (n = 74) experienced a bowel obstruction. The elective diversions (n = 40) were not associated with serious complications (Clavien-Dindo grade ⩾ 3b). Patients with a diverting ostomy (n = 30) had similar time intervals from diagnosis to neoadjuvant treatment and to definite tumor resection as those without diversion but experienced more complex primary tumor resections in terms of blood loss and operation time.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>An elective diverting ostomy is a relatively safe procedure in rectal cancer patients requiring neoadjuvant therapy. More than one out of five non-diverted patients with endoscopically impassable rectal tumors developed bowel obstruction and would potentially have benefited from an elective diversion.</p>","PeriodicalId":49566,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"197-201"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140946008","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Specimen tomosynthesis provides no additional value to specimen ultrasound in ultrasound-visible malignant breast lesions. 对于超声可视的乳腺恶性病变,标本断层扫描与标本超声相比没有额外价值。
IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q1 SURGERY Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-27 DOI: 10.1177/14574969241233435
Sa'ed Almasarweh, Mazen Sudah, Hidemi Okuma, Sarianna Joukainen, Ritva Vanninen, Amro Masarwah

Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy and added value of specimen tomosynthesis (ST) to specimen ultrasound (SUS) in margin assessment of excised breast specimens in breast-conserving therapy for non-palpable US-visible breast lesions.

Materials: Between January 2018 and August 2019, all consecutive patients diagnosed with non-palpable breast cancer visible by ultrasound (US), treated with breast-conserving surgery (BCS) and requiring radiological intraoperative breast specimen assessment, were included in this study. Excised breast specimens were examined with SUS by radiologists blinded to the ST results, and margins smaller than 10 mm were recorded. STs were evaluated retrospectively by experienced radiologists.

Results: A total of 120 specimens were included. SUS showed a statistically significant correlation with pathological margin measurements, while ST did not and provided no additional information. The odds ratios (ORs) for SUS to predict a positive margin was 3.429 (confidence interval (CI) = 0.548-21.432) using a 10-mm cut-off point and 14.182 (CI = 2.134-94.254) using a 5-mm cut-off point, while the OR for ST were 2.528 (CI = 0.400-15.994) and 3.188 (CI = 0.318-31.998), respectively.

Conclusions: SUS was superior in evaluating intraoperative resection margins of US-visible breast resection specimens when compared to ST. Therefore, ST could be considered redundant in applicable situations.

研究背景本研究旨在评估标本断层扫描(ST)与标本超声(SUS)在保乳治疗中切除乳腺标本边缘评估的准确性和附加值:2018年1月至2019年8月期间,本研究纳入了所有经超声(US)确诊为不可扪及的乳腺癌、接受保乳手术(BCS)治疗且需要术中乳腺标本放射学评估的连续患者。切除的乳腺标本由对ST结果保密的放射科医生用SUS进行检查,并记录小于10毫米的边缘。由经验丰富的放射科医生对 ST 进行回顾性评估:结果:共纳入 120 例标本。SUS与病理边缘测量结果有统计学意义的相关性,而ST则没有,也没有提供额外的信息。采用 10 毫米截断点时,SUS 预测边缘阳性的几率比(ORs)为 3.429(置信区间 (CI) = 0.548-21.432),采用 5 毫米截断点时为 14.182(CI = 2.134-94.254),而 ST 的几率比分别为 2.528(CI = 0.400-15.994)和 3.188(CI = 0.318-31.998):结论:与 ST 相比,SUS 在评估 US 可见乳腺切除标本的术中切除边缘方面更具优势。因此,ST在适用情况下可被视为多余。
{"title":"Specimen tomosynthesis provides no additional value to specimen ultrasound in ultrasound-visible malignant breast lesions.","authors":"Sa'ed Almasarweh, Mazen Sudah, Hidemi Okuma, Sarianna Joukainen, Ritva Vanninen, Amro Masarwah","doi":"10.1177/14574969241233435","DOIUrl":"10.1177/14574969241233435","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy and added value of specimen tomosynthesis (ST) to specimen ultrasound (SUS) in margin assessment of excised breast specimens in breast-conserving therapy for non-palpable US-visible breast lesions.</p><p><strong>Materials: </strong>Between January 2018 and August 2019, all consecutive patients diagnosed with non-palpable breast cancer visible by ultrasound (US), treated with breast-conserving surgery (BCS) and requiring radiological intraoperative breast specimen assessment, were included in this study. Excised breast specimens were examined with SUS by radiologists blinded to the ST results, and margins smaller than 10 mm were recorded. STs were evaluated retrospectively by experienced radiologists.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 120 specimens were included. SUS showed a statistically significant correlation with pathological margin measurements, while ST did not and provided no additional information. The odds ratios (ORs) for SUS to predict a positive margin was 3.429 (confidence interval (CI) = 0.548-21.432) using a 10-mm cut-off point and 14.182 (CI = 2.134-94.254) using a 5-mm cut-off point, while the OR for ST were 2.528 (CI = 0.400-15.994) and 3.188 (CI = 0.318-31.998), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>SUS was superior in evaluating intraoperative resection margins of US-visible breast resection specimens when compared to ST. Therefore, ST could be considered redundant in applicable situations.</p>","PeriodicalId":49566,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"237-245"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139984327","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Management and risk of upgrade of atypical ductal hyperplasia in the breast: A population-based retrospective cohort study. 乳腺非典型导管增生的管理和升级风险:一项基于人群的回顾性队列研究。
IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q1 SURGERY Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-27 DOI: 10.1177/14574969241234115
Charlotta Wadsten, Gunilla Rask

Background: International guidelines recommend open surgery for atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH) in the breast due to risk of underestimating malignant disease. Considering the ongoing randomized trials of active surveillance of low-risk ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), it seems reasonable to define a low-risk group of women with ADH where a conservative approach is appropriate. The aim here was to evaluate the management and risk for upgrade of lesions diagnosed as ADH in percutaneous breast biopsies in two Swedish hospitals.

Methods: All women with a screen-detected or symptomatic breast lesion breast imaging-reporting and data system (BI-RADS) 2-4 and a percutaneous biopsy showing ADH between 2013 and 2022 at Sundsvall Hospital and Umeå University Hospital were included. Information regarding imaging, histopathology, clinical features, and management was retrieved from medical records. Odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for upgrade to malignant diagnosis after surgery were calculated by logistic regression analysis.

Results: Altogether, 101 women were included with a mean age 56.1 (range 36-93) years. Most women were selected from the national mammography screening program due to microcalcifications. Biopsies were performed with vacuum-assisted biopsy (60.4%) or core-needle biopsy (39.6%). Forty-eight women (47.5%) underwent surgery, of which 11 were upgraded to DCIS, and 7 to invasive breast cancer (upgrade rate 37.5%). Among the 53 women managed conservatively (median follow-up 74 months), one woman (1.9%) developed subsequent ipsilateral DCIS. The combined upgrade rate was 18.8%. No clinical variable statistically significantly correlating to risk of upgrade was identified.

Conclusions: The upgrade rate of 37.5% in women undergoing surgery compared to an estimated 5-year risk of ipsilateral malignancy at 1.9% in women managed conservatively indicate that non-surgical management of select women with ADH is feasible. Research should focus on defining reproducible criteria differentiating high-risk from low-risk ADH.

背景:由于存在低估恶性疾病的风险,国际指南建议对乳腺非典型导管增生(ADH)进行开放手术。考虑到目前正在进行的对低风险乳腺导管原位癌(DCIS)进行积极监控的随机试验,似乎有理由定义一个低风险的 ADH 女性群体,在该群体中采取保守方法是合适的。本文旨在评估瑞典两家医院对经皮乳腺活检中诊断为 ADH 的病变的管理和升级风险:方法:纳入2013年至2022年期间在松兹瓦尔医院和于默奥大学医院筛查出或有症状的乳腺病变乳腺成像报告和数据系统(BI-RADS)2-4和经皮活检显示为ADH的所有女性。从病历中检索了有关影像学、组织病理学、临床特征和治疗的信息。通过逻辑回归分析计算了术后升级为恶性诊断的比值比(OR)和95%置信区间(CI):共纳入 101 名妇女,平均年龄 56.1 岁(36-93 岁)。大多数妇女都是因微小钙化而从国家乳腺 X 射线筛查计划中被选中的。活检采用真空辅助活检(60.4%)或核心针活检(39.6%)。48 名妇女(47.5%)接受了手术,其中 11 人升级为 DCIS,7 人升级为浸润性乳腺癌(升级率为 37.5%)。在接受保守治疗的 53 名妇女中(中位随访 74 个月),有一名妇女(1.9%)随后发展为同侧 DCIS。综合升级率为 18.8%。没有发现与升级风险有明显统计学相关性的临床变量:接受手术治疗的妇女的升级率为 37.5%,而保守治疗妇女的 5 年同侧恶性肿瘤风险估计为 1.9%,这表明对部分 ADH 妇女进行非手术治疗是可行的。研究重点应放在确定区分高风险和低风险 ADH 的可重复标准上。
{"title":"Management and risk of upgrade of atypical ductal hyperplasia in the breast: A population-based retrospective cohort study.","authors":"Charlotta Wadsten, Gunilla Rask","doi":"10.1177/14574969241234115","DOIUrl":"10.1177/14574969241234115","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>International guidelines recommend open surgery for atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH) in the breast due to risk of underestimating malignant disease. Considering the ongoing randomized trials of active surveillance of low-risk ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), it seems reasonable to define a low-risk group of women with ADH where a conservative approach is appropriate. The aim here was to evaluate the management and risk for upgrade of lesions diagnosed as ADH in percutaneous breast biopsies in two Swedish hospitals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All women with a screen-detected or symptomatic breast lesion breast imaging-reporting and data system (BI-RADS) 2-4 and a percutaneous biopsy showing ADH between 2013 and 2022 at Sundsvall Hospital and Umeå University Hospital were included. Information regarding imaging, histopathology, clinical features, and management was retrieved from medical records. Odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for upgrade to malignant diagnosis after surgery were calculated by logistic regression analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Altogether, 101 women were included with a mean age 56.1 (range 36-93) years. Most women were selected from the national mammography screening program due to microcalcifications. Biopsies were performed with vacuum-assisted biopsy (60.4%) or core-needle biopsy (39.6%). Forty-eight women (47.5%) underwent surgery, of which 11 were upgraded to DCIS, and 7 to invasive breast cancer (upgrade rate 37.5%). Among the 53 women managed conservatively (median follow-up 74 months), one woman (1.9%) developed subsequent ipsilateral DCIS. The combined upgrade rate was 18.8%. No clinical variable statistically significantly correlating to risk of upgrade was identified.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The upgrade rate of 37.5% in women undergoing surgery compared to an estimated 5-year risk of ipsilateral malignancy at 1.9% in women managed conservatively indicate that non-surgical management of select women with ADH is feasible. Research should focus on defining reproducible criteria differentiating high-risk from low-risk ADH.</p>","PeriodicalId":49566,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"229-236"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139984326","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Scandinavian Journal of Surgery
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1