Scandinavian Journal of Surgery最新文献

Background and aims: For patients with biliary tract cancer involving the hepatic hilum, major hepatic resection with extrahepatic bile duct resection may be required. In addition to perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (PHCC), the same extent of surgery is used in advanced gallbladder cancer (GBC) and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (IHCC) with hilar involvement. Few studies compare prognostic factors and long-term outcomes across tumor types. This study compared risk characteristics and outcomes after surgery in all subtypes of biliary tract cancer with hilar involvement.

Methods: Patients with biliary tract cancer with hilar involvement undergoing major liver resection and extrahepatic bile duct resection between 2011 and 2021 at a single center were retrospectively analyzed. The primary postoperative outcome was overall survival. Secondary outcomes were recurrence-free survival and postoperative complications. Survival analysis was performed with Cox regression analysis and Kaplan-Meier method.

Results: One-hundred and eight patients were included. Seventy-three (67%) had PHCC, 24 (22%) had GBC, and 11 (10%) had IHCC. Hilar-invading IHCC and GBC had more adverse histopathological factors like lymph node positivity (p = 0.021), higher number of positive nodes (p = 0.043), and larger tumor size (p < 0.001) compared with PHCC. Peritoneal invasion and lymph node positivity were significant independent predictors for survival (p = 0.011 and p = 0.004, respectively). Median overall survival was 29 months for PHCC, 22 months for GBC and 21 months for IHCC (p = 0.53). IHCC tended to recur earlier (p = 0.046) than GBC and PHCC (6, 15, and 18 months, respectively).

Conclusion: Patients with biliary tract cancer with hilar involvement undergoing major liver resection and resection of extrahepatic bile ducts had similar overall survival regardless of subtype, while IHCC recurred earlier. Peritoneal cancer invasion was common in all subtypes, including PHCC, and was an independent prognostic factor. This finding may support routine reporting of peritoneal invasion-status in resected biliary tract cancer.

Background and objective: Breast cancer and its treatments can have a marked impact on the patient health-related quality of life. The aim of this study was to produce and validate Finnish versions of the breast-conserving treatment, mastectomy and breast reconstruction modules of the BREAST-Q, a patient-reported outcome tool designed specifically for women undergoing treatment for breast cancer.

Methods: The relevant BREAST-Q modules were translated to Finnish according to established guidelines. Altogether 777 preoperative women were recruited at the Breast Surgery Unit and the Plastic Surgery Unit of Helsinki University Hospital between December 2019 and March 2021. This included 541 patients scheduled for breast-conserving surgery, 86 for mastectomy, and 150 for breast reconstruction. Postoperative patients were recruited through a postal survey, approaching 500 women operated for breast cancer in 2017, including 250 women who had undergone breast-conserving surgery and 250 women who had undergone mastectomy, as well as 339 women who had undergone breast reconstruction between August 2017 and July 2019. The patients were invited to fill the BREAST-Q modules relevant to their treatment and the general health-related quality-of-life instrument SF-36. A repeat administration of the BREAST-Q was done 2 weeks later.

Results: A total of 665 (41%) women participated in the study, 339 (44%) preoperatively and 326 (39%) postoperatively. The BREAST-Q subscales showed high internal consistency with most Cronbach's alphas > 0.8. The repeatability of the subscales was excellent with most intra-class correlation coefficients > 0.75. Low or negligible correlation was observed between BREAST-Q subscales and SF-36 domains.

Conclusions: The Finnish version of the BREAST-Q modules breast-conserving treatment, mastectomy, and breast reconstruction performs well in assessing the health-related quality of life of women undergoing surgery for breast cancer or breast reconstruction.

Introduction: The best approach for total mesorectal excision (TME) remains controversial. Two recently described approaches are robotic TME (RTME) and transanal TME (TaTME). This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare the outcomes between robotic surgery and TaTME in patients undergoing rectal cancer resection.

Methods: We structured this systematic review and meta-analysis according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines 2020 and Assessing the Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) guidelines. An electronic search of relevant literature was conducted on 20 May 2023. The protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42023435259).

Results: Eleven eligible nonrandomised studies were included in this study. The study included 2796 patients (RTME = 1800; TaTME = 996). The RTME group had a higher rate of complete TME. However, no significant differences were observed in mortality, morbidity, severe complications, operative time, conversion rate, anastomotic leak, hospital stay, CRM-positive resection margin, distal resection margin, number of harvested lymph nodes, abdominoperineal resection (APR) rate, or local recurrence between the RTME and TaTME groups.

Conclusion: The RTME technique may ensure a higher rate of complete TME than TaTME. However, no significant differences were observed in most postoperative outcomes and oncological safety between the RTME and TaTME groups. Evidence does not conclusively favor one technique over the other, highlighting the need for additional randomized controlled trials to better define their roles in rectal cancer surgery.

Background: Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is the most common entrapment neuropathy of the upper extremity, and its surgical treatment is carpal tunnel release (CTR). It is mostly performed in local anesthesia. There are no clinical randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing local infiltration anesthesia with or without a distal median nerve block in CTR. The aim of the PERSONNEL trial (carPal tunnEl ReleaSe lOcal iNfiltratioN mEdian bLockade) is to assess whether a distal median nerve block reduces pain during and after the procedure in addition to local anesthesia.

Methods: This is a single-center randomized clinical superiority trial comparing local anesthesia alone and local anesthesia with a distal median nerve block for CTR in patients with CTS. Adult patients will be randomized in one university hospital in Finland, and the intended sample size is 118. The primary outcome is the mean pain level after the procedure during 72 h using a visual analogue scale (VAS). The secondary outcomes include expected pain; pain during the injection of the anesthetic solution caused by pressure, burning, needle sting, and total pain; worst pain during the surgery; duration of anesthesia; number of experienced needle stings; Boston Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Questionnaire (BCTSQ); pain killer consumption;, patient satisfaction using Net Promoter Score (NPS); and complications.

Discussion: Patient satisfaction is a crucial factor in modern healthcare. A distal median nerve block may reduce pain during and after CTR, potentially increasing patient satisfaction with the given treatment. It can also be hypothesized that better postoperative pain control may prevent complications, for example, complex regional pain syndrome. However, we lack adequate evidence to justify the use of distal median nerve block, which can itself predispose patients to complications, for example, median nerve injury. Therefore, there is a need for adequate RCTs to assess its efficacy. The results of this study can be used to optimize anesthesia for carpal tunnel surgery, improve patient satisfaction, and possibly prevent complications.

Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05372393.

Background and objective: Most of the studies on metastasectomy in renal cell cancer are based on metachronous, often oligometastatic disease. Prior data on the impact of metastasectomy in synchronous metastatic renal cell cancer (mRCC) is, however, very scarce. We aimed to investigate the role of complete and incomplete metastasectomy in a large, nationwide patient population.

Methods: We analyzed nationwide data, including all synchronous mRCC cases in Finland diagnosed during a 6-year period identified from the Finnish Cancer Registry, and complemented with patient records from the treating hospitals. We only included the patients who underwent removal of the primary tumor by nephrectomy. We performed univariate and multivariable adjusted analysis to identify the effect of metastasectomy on overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS).

Results: We included 483 patients with synchronous mRCC. Overall, 57 patients underwent complete and 96 incomplete metastasectomy, while 330 patients had no metastasectomy. The median OS was 17.9 and CSS 17.2 months for all patients. The median OS and the median CSS were 59.3 and 60.8 months for the complete, 21.9 and 25.1 for the incomplete, and 14.5 and 14.8 months for the no metastasectomy groups (p < 0.001 for differences). In both applied multivariable statistical models, the OS and CSS benefit from complete metastasectomy remained significant (hazard ratios (HRs) varied between 0.42 and 0.54, p < 0.001) compared with the no metastasectomy group. However, there was no improvement in survival estimates in the incomplete metastasectomy group compared with the no metastasectomy group (HRs varied between 1.04 and 1.10, p > 0.40).

Conclusions: Complete metastasectomy, when possible, can be considered as a treatment option for selected patients with synchronous mRCC who are fit for surgery. By contrast, we found no survival benefit from an incomplete metastasectomy suggesting that such procedures should not be performed for these patients.

Background: Rectal cancer patients commonly benefit from neoadjuvant therapy before resection surgery. For these patients, an elective ostomy diversion is frequently considered, despite the absence of conclusive evidence when a diversion is advantageous. This is a retrospective observational single-center study on a 4-year consecutive rectal cancer cohort undergoing neoadjuvant therapy, aiming at improving the understanding of risks and benefits associated with ostomy diversion.

Material and method: Baseline characteristics, tumor-specific data, clinical events, and outcomes were collected using the Swedish Colorectal Cancer Registry and medical records.

Results: Thirty-two (30.2%) of the 106 included patients presented with endoscopic impassable tumors at diagnosis, of which 18 (56.2%) had diverting ostomy. Three out of 14 with impassable tumor and no diversion developed a bowel obstruction. None of the patients with an endoscopically passable tumor at diagnosis (n = 74) experienced a bowel obstruction. The elective diversions (n = 40) were not associated with serious complications (Clavien-Dindo grade ⩾ 3b). Patients with a diverting ostomy (n = 30) had similar time intervals from diagnosis to neoadjuvant treatment and to definite tumor resection as those without diversion but experienced more complex primary tumor resections in terms of blood loss and operation time.

Conclusion: An elective diverting ostomy is a relatively safe procedure in rectal cancer patients requiring neoadjuvant therapy. More than one out of five non-diverted patients with endoscopically impassable rectal tumors developed bowel obstruction and would potentially have benefited from an elective diversion.

Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy and added value of specimen tomosynthesis (ST) to specimen ultrasound (SUS) in margin assessment of excised breast specimens in breast-conserving therapy for non-palpable US-visible breast lesions.

Materials: Between January 2018 and August 2019, all consecutive patients diagnosed with non-palpable breast cancer visible by ultrasound (US), treated with breast-conserving surgery (BCS) and requiring radiological intraoperative breast specimen assessment, were included in this study. Excised breast specimens were examined with SUS by radiologists blinded to the ST results, and margins smaller than 10 mm were recorded. STs were evaluated retrospectively by experienced radiologists.

Results: A total of 120 specimens were included. SUS showed a statistically significant correlation with pathological margin measurements, while ST did not and provided no additional information. The odds ratios (ORs) for SUS to predict a positive margin was 3.429 (confidence interval (CI) = 0.548-21.432) using a 10-mm cut-off point and 14.182 (CI = 2.134-94.254) using a 5-mm cut-off point, while the OR for ST were 2.528 (CI = 0.400-15.994) and 3.188 (CI = 0.318-31.998), respectively.

Conclusions: SUS was superior in evaluating intraoperative resection margins of US-visible breast resection specimens when compared to ST. Therefore, ST could be considered redundant in applicable situations.

Background: International guidelines recommend open surgery for atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH) in the breast due to risk of underestimating malignant disease. Considering the ongoing randomized trials of active surveillance of low-risk ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), it seems reasonable to define a low-risk group of women with ADH where a conservative approach is appropriate. The aim here was to evaluate the management and risk for upgrade of lesions diagnosed as ADH in percutaneous breast biopsies in two Swedish hospitals.

Methods: All women with a screen-detected or symptomatic breast lesion breast imaging-reporting and data system (BI-RADS) 2-4 and a percutaneous biopsy showing ADH between 2013 and 2022 at Sundsvall Hospital and Umeå University Hospital were included. Information regarding imaging, histopathology, clinical features, and management was retrieved from medical records. Odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for upgrade to malignant diagnosis after surgery were calculated by logistic regression analysis.

Results: Altogether, 101 women were included with a mean age 56.1 (range 36-93) years. Most women were selected from the national mammography screening program due to microcalcifications. Biopsies were performed with vacuum-assisted biopsy (60.4%) or core-needle biopsy (39.6%). Forty-eight women (47.5%) underwent surgery, of which 11 were upgraded to DCIS, and 7 to invasive breast cancer (upgrade rate 37.5%). Among the 53 women managed conservatively (median follow-up 74 months), one woman (1.9%) developed subsequent ipsilateral DCIS. The combined upgrade rate was 18.8%. No clinical variable statistically significantly correlating to risk of upgrade was identified.

Conclusions: The upgrade rate of 37.5% in women undergoing surgery compared to an estimated 5-year risk of ipsilateral malignancy at 1.9% in women managed conservatively indicate that non-surgical management of select women with ADH is feasible. Research should focus on defining reproducible criteria differentiating high-risk from low-risk ADH.

Background and objective: Studies on the outcomes of parathyroid surgery are scarce. The aim was to report the outcomes and to study the association between pre- and peri-operative information with the outcomes of patients operated for primary hyperparathyroidism.

Methods: This was a retrospective, descriptive study with unselected patients treated surgically for primary hyperparathyroidism from a catchment population of 704,500 in Finland. Data were acquired from the electronic hospital registers based on parathyroid surgery procedure codes between 1 January 2017 and 31 December 2018. Preoperative data, surgical data, preoperative and postoperative laboratory values, histopathological findings, and postoperative clinical data were recorded.

Results: During the 2-year study period, 149 patients with primary hyperparathyroidism were treated surgically with a 97% remission rate. Surgical complications included postoperative bleeding in two patients (1%) and vocal cord paralysis in one patient (0.6%). No postoperative infections were reported. Three patients (2%) developed postoperative hypoparathyroidism necessitating the use of alfacalcidol more than 1 month after surgery. Ionized calcium measured 0-1 days after surgery was not statistically significantly associated with remission or postoperative hypoparathyroidism. Serum parathyroid hormone (PTH) assessed 0-1 days postoperatively was associated with persistent disease, but not with postoperative hypoparathyroidism. The histopathological diagnosis was adenoma or hyperplasia in 112 patients (75%), atypical adenoma in 28 patients (19%), and carcinoma in five patients (3%). Patients with parathyroid carcinoma had higher preoperative ionized calcium and PTH values than those with adenoma or hyperplasia.

Conclusions: Most patients who were operated due to primary hyperparathyroidism achieved normocalcemia after surgery, and the frequency of complications was low. Ionized calcium taken 0-1 days after surgery was not associated with remission of hyperparathyroidism or postoperative hypoparathyroidism. High postoperative serum PTH predicted persistent disease.

Background and objective: Defunctioning loop ileostomy (DLI) is frequently used to decrease the consequences of anastomotic leak after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) surgery but is controversial because of stoma-associated morbidity. The aim of this study was to describe stoma-associated morbidity in IPAA-DLI patients compared with terminal ileostomy patients.

Methods: Patients treated with colectomy for inflammatory bowel disease at Skåne University Hospital, Sweden, between 2005 and 2021 were eligible for inclusion. Terminal stoma-related morbidity was measured until 12 months after colectomy, IPAA surgery, or conversion to ileorectal anastomosis, whichever occurred first. DLI-related morbidity was measured until 12 months after IPAA surgery or stoma closure, whichever occurred first. Laboratory data were reviewed up to 18 months after surgery since patients without complications were rarely subjected to blood sampling. Data on patient characteristics, renal function, surgical complications, and readmissions were collected retrospectively. Primary outcomes were DLI- and terminal ileostomy-related renal morbidity, whereas secondary outcomes focused on stoma-related complications.

Results: The study cohort consisted of 165 patients with terminal ileostomy after colectomy (median (interquartile range (IQR)): stoma time 30 (15-74) months) and 42 patients with IPAA-DLI (median (IQR): stoma time 4 (3-5) months). One case of anastomotic IPAA leakage was observed. IPAA-DLI patients more often required hospital care due to high-volume stoma output immediately after surgery (0-30 days, 29%) compared with terminal ileostomy patients (4%, p < 0.001). There were no significant differences in acute renal injury (p = 0.073) or chronic renal failure (p = 0.936) incidences between the groups. DLI closure was achieved in 95% of IPAA-DLI patients, with 5% suffering Clavien-Dindo complications > 2.

Conclusions: IPAA-DLI patients exhibited higher incidence of short-term high-volume stoma output without higher rates of acute renal injury or chronic renal failure compared with terminal ileostomy patients in this small single-center retrospective study suggesting that the risk of renal morbidity in IPAA-DLI patients may have been overestimated.