首页 > 最新文献

Radiation Oncology最新文献

英文 中文
SSTR PET/CT for skull base low-grade meningioma: a critical tool for accurate gross tumor volume delineation in radiotherapy? 颅底低级别脑膜瘤的SSTR PET/CT:放射治疗中精确大体肿瘤体积描绘的关键工具?
IF 3.3 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-09-22 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-025-02718-4
Frederik Fuchs, Sebastian N Marschner, Jan Hofmaier, Maya Rottler, Indra Hadi, Sebastian H Maier, Tobias Greve, Adrien Holzgreve, Nathalie L Albert, Raphael Bodensohn, Claus Belka, Maximilian Niyazi, Franziska Walter

Background: Precise delineation of gross tumor volume (GTV) is fundamental for effective radiation therapy in low-grade skull base meningiomas. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) serves as the primary imaging tool but may not fully represent tumor extent. This study investigates the additional value of incorporating Somatostatin receptor (SSTR)-directed PET/CT in radiation therapy planning.

Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted with four experienced radiation oncologists contouring GTVs for skull base meningiomas using MRI alone (GTV_MRI), PET/CT alone (GTV_PET/CT), and both modalities combined (GTV_ALL). Consensus ground truth volumes were generated for each modality through a STAPLE algorithm. Agreement between modalities, excluding observer variability, was assessed using statistical metrics including Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC), Jaccard Index (JCI), Hausdorff distance (HD95), Geographical Miss Index (GMI), sensitivity, and kappa statistics.

Results: The study included 25 patients (15 females, 10 males; median age 56 years (range: 23-74 years), with 96% achieving local control post-radiotherapy over a median follow-up of 64 months (range: 28-135 months). Substantial interobserver agreement was observed, with median kappa values of 0.74 for GTV_MRI, 0.68 for GTV_PET/CT, and 0.77 for GTV_ALL. Median consensus volumes were 6.65 cc (MRISTAPLE), 7.21 cc (PETSTAPLE), and 6.73 cc (ALLSTAPLE). The median GMI for MRISTAPLE compared to ALLSTAPLE was 0.18 (IQR: 0.11-0.39), and 0.21 (IQR: 0.15-0.28) for PETSTAPLE compared to ALLSTAPLE. The DSC indicated the lowest concordance between MRISTAPLE and PETSTAPLE with a median of 0.75 (IQR: 0.59-0.82), followed by PETSTAPLE versus ALLSTAPLE with a median DSC of 0.84 (IQR: 0.79-0.89), and MRISTAPLE versus ALLSTAPLE with a median DSC of 0.89 (IQR: 0.76-0.92). The integration of PET/CT with MRI significantly enhanced concordance metrics.

Conclusion: Combining MRI and PET/CT improves GTV delineation in low-grade skull base meningiomas, as PET/CT can reveal regions missed by MRI, which may slightly underestimate tumor size. This multimodal imaging approach enhances consensus and supports its role in radiotherapy planning. Standardized protocols and technical integration remain key future goals.

背景:准确描绘总肿瘤体积(GTV)是低级别颅底脑膜瘤有效放射治疗的基础。磁共振成像(MRI)是主要的成像工具,但可能不能完全代表肿瘤的范围。本研究探讨了结合生长抑素受体(SSTR)定向PET/CT在放射治疗计划中的附加价值。方法:回顾性分析4名经验丰富的放射肿瘤学家分别使用MRI (GTV_MRI)、PET/CT (GTV_PET/CT)和两种方式联合(GTV_ALL)对颅底脑膜瘤进行gtv轮廓的临床资料。通过STAPLE算法为每种模态生成共识基础真量。采用统计指标,包括Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC)、Jaccard Index (JCI)、Hausdorff distance (HD95)、Geographical Miss Index (GMI)、sensitivity(灵敏度)和kappa statistics,评估模式之间的一致性,排除观察者的可变性。结果:本研究纳入25例患者,其中女性15例,男性10例,中位年龄56岁(范围23-74岁),96%患者放疗后局部控制,中位随访64个月(范围28-135个月)。观察到大量观察者之间的一致,GTV_MRI的中位kappa值为0.74,GTV_PET/CT为0.68,GTV_ALL为0.77。中位共识容积为6.65 cc (mrristaple)、7.21 cc (PETSTAPLE)和6.73 cc (ALLSTAPLE)。与ALLSTAPLE相比,mri的中位GMI为0.18 (IQR: 0.11-0.39), PETSTAPLE与ALLSTAPLE的中位GMI为0.21 (IQR: 0.15-0.28)。DSC显示,mri与PETSTAPLE的一致性最低,中位数为0.75 (IQR: 0.59-0.82),其次是PETSTAPLE与ALLSTAPLE的中位数DSC为0.84 (IQR: 0.79-0.89), mri与ALLSTAPLE的中位数DSC为0.89 (IQR: 0.76-0.92)。PET/CT与MRI的整合显著增强了一致性指标。结论:MRI与PET/CT结合可以改善低级别颅底脑膜瘤的GTV描绘,因为PET/CT可以显示MRI遗漏的区域,可能略低估肿瘤大小。这种多模态成像方法增强了共识,并支持其在放疗计划中的作用。标准化协议和技术集成仍然是未来的关键目标。
{"title":"SSTR PET/CT for skull base low-grade meningioma: a critical tool for accurate gross tumor volume delineation in radiotherapy?","authors":"Frederik Fuchs, Sebastian N Marschner, Jan Hofmaier, Maya Rottler, Indra Hadi, Sebastian H Maier, Tobias Greve, Adrien Holzgreve, Nathalie L Albert, Raphael Bodensohn, Claus Belka, Maximilian Niyazi, Franziska Walter","doi":"10.1186/s13014-025-02718-4","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s13014-025-02718-4","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Precise delineation of gross tumor volume (GTV) is fundamental for effective radiation therapy in low-grade skull base meningiomas. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) serves as the primary imaging tool but may not fully represent tumor extent. This study investigates the additional value of incorporating Somatostatin receptor (SSTR)-directed PET/CT in radiation therapy planning.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted with four experienced radiation oncologists contouring GTVs for skull base meningiomas using MRI alone (GTV_MRI), PET/CT alone (GTV_PET/CT), and both modalities combined (GTV_ALL). Consensus ground truth volumes were generated for each modality through a STAPLE algorithm. Agreement between modalities, excluding observer variability, was assessed using statistical metrics including Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC), Jaccard Index (JCI), Hausdorff distance (HD95), Geographical Miss Index (GMI), sensitivity, and kappa statistics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 25 patients (15 females, 10 males; median age 56 years (range: 23-74 years), with 96% achieving local control post-radiotherapy over a median follow-up of 64 months (range: 28-135 months). Substantial interobserver agreement was observed, with median kappa values of 0.74 for GTV_MRI, 0.68 for GTV_PET/CT, and 0.77 for GTV_ALL. Median consensus volumes were 6.65 cc (MRI<sub>STAPLE</sub>), 7.21 cc (PET<sub>STAPLE</sub>), and 6.73 cc (ALL<sub>STAPLE</sub>). The median GMI for MRI<sub>STAPLE</sub> compared to ALL<sub>STAPLE</sub> was 0.18 (IQR: 0.11-0.39), and 0.21 (IQR: 0.15-0.28) for PET<sub>STAPLE</sub> compared to ALL<sub>STAPLE</sub>. The DSC indicated the lowest concordance between MRI<sub>STAPLE</sub> and PET<sub>STAPLE</sub> with a median of 0.75 (IQR: 0.59-0.82), followed by PET<sub>STAPLE</sub> versus ALL<sub>STAPLE</sub> with a median DSC of 0.84 (IQR: 0.79-0.89), and MRI<sub>STAPLE</sub> versus ALL<sub>STAPLE</sub> with a median DSC of 0.89 (IQR: 0.76-0.92). The integration of PET/CT with MRI significantly enhanced concordance metrics.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Combining MRI and PET/CT improves GTV delineation in low-grade skull base meningiomas, as PET/CT can reveal regions missed by MRI, which may slightly underestimate tumor size. This multimodal imaging approach enhances consensus and supports its role in radiotherapy planning. Standardized protocols and technical integration remain key future goals.</p>","PeriodicalId":49639,"journal":{"name":"Radiation Oncology","volume":"20 1","pages":"142"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2025-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12455788/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145126216","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Correction: Research trends and hot spots in the prevention and management of radiation dermatitis: a bibliometric analysis based on CiteSpace. 更正:放射性皮炎防治的研究趋势与热点:基于CiteSpace的文献计量学分析。
IF 3.3 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-09-18 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-025-02728-2
Lu Zhang, Lian Liu, Fang Li, Peijuan Chen, Feng Ye
{"title":"Correction: Research trends and hot spots in the prevention and management of radiation dermatitis: a bibliometric analysis based on CiteSpace.","authors":"Lu Zhang, Lian Liu, Fang Li, Peijuan Chen, Feng Ye","doi":"10.1186/s13014-025-02728-2","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s13014-025-02728-2","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":49639,"journal":{"name":"Radiation Oncology","volume":"20 1","pages":"141"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2025-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12445019/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145087896","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
CHAT-RT study: ChatGPT in radiation oncology-a survey on usage, perception, and impact among DEGRO members. CHAT-RT研究:放射肿瘤学中的ChatGPT -对DEGRO成员的使用、认知和影响的调查。
IF 3.3 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-09-15 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-025-02721-9
Dinah Konnerth, Alev Altay-Langguth, Diana-Coralia Dehelean, Sebastian H Maier, Montserrat Pazos, Paul Rogowski, Stephan Schönecker, Chukwuka Eze, Stefanie Corradini, Claus Belka, Sebastian N Marschner

Background: Radiation oncology is increasingly turning to Artificial Intelligence (AI) - and in particular Chat Generative pre-trained transformer (ChatGPT) - for decision support, patient education, and workflow efficiency. Despite promising gains, questions about accuracy, General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR)-compliance and ethical use persist, especially in high-stakes cancer care. To clarify real-world attitudes and practices, we surveyed members of the German Society of Radiation Oncology (DEGRO) on their use, perceptions, and concerns regarding ChatGPT across clinical, research, communication, and administrative tasks.

Methods: An anonymous online survey was implemented via LimeSurvey platform and distributed to all members of the DEGRO in Germany, Austria, and Switzerland between April and June 2024. The 40-item questionnaire-covering demographics, radiotherapy experience, and ChatGPT's clinical, research, communication, and administrative applications-was developed through a narrative literature review, ChatGPT-assisted drafting, back-translation, expert validation, and pilot testing. Fully completed responses were used for descriptive statistics and analysis.

Results: Of 213 respondents, 159 fully completed the survey. Participants were predominantly based in Germany (92.5%), worked in university hospitals (74.2%), and identified as radiation oncologists (54.7%), with a broad range of radiotherapy experience (< 1 year: 7.5%; >15 years: 24.5%). Awareness of ChatGPT was high (94.9%), yet actual use varied: 32.1% never used it, while 35.2% employed it regularly for administrative tasks and 30.2% for manuscript drafting. Mid-career clinicians (6-10 years' experience) showed the greatest enthusiasm-44% agreed it saves time and 72% planned further integration-though all career stages (71.7% overall) expressed strong interest in formal training. Satisfaction was highest for administrative (94.6%) and manuscript support (91.7%) but lower for technical queries (66.7%). Major concerns included misinformation (69.2%), erosion of critical thinking (57.9%), and data-privacy risks (57.2%).

Conclusion: Our survey demonstrates high awareness and adoption of ChatGPT for administrative and educational tasks, alongside more cautious use in clinical decision-making. Widespread concerns about misinformation, critical-thinking erosion, and data privacy-especially among early- and mid-career clinicians-underscore the need for targeted AI training, rigorous validation, and transparent governance to ensure safe, effective integration into patient care.

背景:放射肿瘤学越来越多地转向人工智能(AI) -特别是聊天生成预训练转换器(ChatGPT) -用于决策支持,患者教育和工作流程效率。尽管取得了可喜的进展,但关于准确性、通用数据保护条例(GDPR)合规性和道德使用的问题仍然存在,特别是在高风险的癌症治疗中。为了澄清现实世界的态度和实践,我们调查了德国放射肿瘤学会(DEGRO)的成员,了解他们在临床、研究、沟通和管理任务中对ChatGPT的使用、看法和关注。方法:通过limessurvey平台进行匿名在线调查,并于2024年4 - 6月在德国、奥地利和瑞士的DEGRO所有成员中进行分发。问卷共有40个条目,包括人口统计、放疗经验、ChatGPT的临床、研究、交流和管理应用。问卷通过文献综述、ChatGPT辅助起草、反翻译、专家验证和试点测试等方法编制而成。完整填写的问卷用于描述性统计和分析。结果:213名受访者中,159人完全完成了调查。参与者主要来自德国(92.5%),在大学医院工作(74.2%),并确定为放射肿瘤学家(54.7%),具有广泛的放射治疗经验(15年:24.5%)。对ChatGPT的知晓率很高(94.9%),但实际使用情况各不相同:32.1%的人从未使用过它,35.2%的人定期使用它进行管理任务,30.2%的人使用它起草手稿。职业生涯中期的临床医生(6-10年经验)表现出最大的热情——44%的人认为这节省了时间,72%的人计划进一步整合——尽管所有职业阶段(总体71.7%)都对正式培训表现出强烈的兴趣。满意度最高的是行政管理(94.6%)和稿件支持(91.7%),而较低的是技术查询(66.7%)。主要的担忧包括错误信息(69.2%)、批判性思维的侵蚀(57.9%)和数据隐私风险(57.2%)。结论:我们的调查显示,ChatGPT在行政和教育任务中的认知度和采用度较高,同时在临床决策中使用更为谨慎。对错误信息、批判性思维侵蚀和数据隐私的普遍担忧——尤其是在职业生涯早期和中期的临床医生中——强调了有针对性的人工智能培训、严格的验证和透明的治理的必要性,以确保安全、有效地融入患者护理。
{"title":"CHAT-RT study: ChatGPT in radiation oncology-a survey on usage, perception, and impact among DEGRO members.","authors":"Dinah Konnerth, Alev Altay-Langguth, Diana-Coralia Dehelean, Sebastian H Maier, Montserrat Pazos, Paul Rogowski, Stephan Schönecker, Chukwuka Eze, Stefanie Corradini, Claus Belka, Sebastian N Marschner","doi":"10.1186/s13014-025-02721-9","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s13014-025-02721-9","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Radiation oncology is increasingly turning to Artificial Intelligence (AI) - and in particular Chat Generative pre-trained transformer (ChatGPT) - for decision support, patient education, and workflow efficiency. Despite promising gains, questions about accuracy, General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR)-compliance and ethical use persist, especially in high-stakes cancer care. To clarify real-world attitudes and practices, we surveyed members of the German Society of Radiation Oncology (DEGRO) on their use, perceptions, and concerns regarding ChatGPT across clinical, research, communication, and administrative tasks.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An anonymous online survey was implemented via LimeSurvey platform and distributed to all members of the DEGRO in Germany, Austria, and Switzerland between April and June 2024. The 40-item questionnaire-covering demographics, radiotherapy experience, and ChatGPT's clinical, research, communication, and administrative applications-was developed through a narrative literature review, ChatGPT-assisted drafting, back-translation, expert validation, and pilot testing. Fully completed responses were used for descriptive statistics and analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 213 respondents, 159 fully completed the survey. Participants were predominantly based in Germany (92.5%), worked in university hospitals (74.2%), and identified as radiation oncologists (54.7%), with a broad range of radiotherapy experience (< 1 year: 7.5%; >15 years: 24.5%). Awareness of ChatGPT was high (94.9%), yet actual use varied: 32.1% never used it, while 35.2% employed it regularly for administrative tasks and 30.2% for manuscript drafting. Mid-career clinicians (6-10 years' experience) showed the greatest enthusiasm-44% agreed it saves time and 72% planned further integration-though all career stages (71.7% overall) expressed strong interest in formal training. Satisfaction was highest for administrative (94.6%) and manuscript support (91.7%) but lower for technical queries (66.7%). Major concerns included misinformation (69.2%), erosion of critical thinking (57.9%), and data-privacy risks (57.2%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our survey demonstrates high awareness and adoption of ChatGPT for administrative and educational tasks, alongside more cautious use in clinical decision-making. Widespread concerns about misinformation, critical-thinking erosion, and data privacy-especially among early- and mid-career clinicians-underscore the need for targeted AI training, rigorous validation, and transparent governance to ensure safe, effective integration into patient care.</p>","PeriodicalId":49639,"journal":{"name":"Radiation Oncology","volume":"20 1","pages":"140"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2025-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12439408/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145070936","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Improved local control using higher dose SBRT in metastatic sarcoma patients. 使用高剂量SBRT改善转移性肉瘤患者的局部控制。
IF 3.3 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-09-08 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-025-02719-3
Mattias Hedman, Elia Rossi, Emmy Dalqvist, Kristin Karlsson, Christina Linder-Stragliotto

Background: Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) has been proven to be a safe and effective alternative to surgery in patients with metastatic primary sarcoma. However, data describing tumor response in relation to the given radiotherapy dose is lacking. Therefore, this study aims at analyzing efficacy and dose-response relationship in a retrospective cohort.

Methods: Patients with metastatic sarcoma treated with ablative SBRT and followed up at the Karolinska University Hospital between 2008 and 2021 were included. SBRT was delivered using an inhomogeneous dose distribution resulting in higher median doses within the planning target volume (PTV) than the dose prescribed. Local control (LC), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), adverse events and dose-response relationship were assessed. Statistical analysis was performed to identify variables that correlate to outcome.

Results: Forty-three patients with a total of 83 lesions were treated. The most frequent histology was leiomyosarcoma (44%). The most common site of metastases was the lung (84%), followed by the liver (11%). The median prescription dose was 45 Gy (range 30-56 Gy) delivered in 3 fractions (range 2-8) with a planned median CTV mean dose of 309 Gy in EQD2 with α/β = 3 Gy. The local control at 1-year, 2-year and 5-year from SBRT treatment was 97, 93 and 84%, respectively. For tumors with a planned mean CTV dose above EQD2 278.8 Gy (corresponding to 60.3 Gy in 3 fractions) the 1, 2 and 5-year local control was 100, 100 and 93%, respectively. Tumors planned with a lower dose than EQD2 278.8 Gy (α/β = 3 Gy) had a 1, 2 and 5-year local control of 90, 70 and 52%, respectively. The difference in local control between the high dose and low dose groups was statistically significant (p < 0.001). The median OS for all patients was 43 months. When respecting dose constraints, there were only limited number of mild side effects.

Conclusion: In this analysis a strongly significant dose-response relationship with excellent LC rates and limited side effects for patients with metastatic lesions of sarcoma were seen. These results could be related to the inhomogeneous dose distribution of SBRT treatments utilized in this study.

背景:立体定向放射治疗(SBRT)已被证明是转移性原发性肉瘤患者手术治疗的安全有效的替代方法。然而,描述肿瘤反应与给定放疗剂量相关的数据是缺乏的。因此,本研究旨在通过回顾性队列分析疗效和剂量-反应关系。方法:纳入2008年至2021年间在卡罗林斯卡大学医院接受消融性SBRT治疗并随访的转移性肉瘤患者。SBRT的剂量分布不均匀,导致计划靶体积(PTV)内的中位剂量高于规定剂量。评估局部控制(LC)、无进展生存(PFS)、总生存(OS)、不良事件和剂量-反应关系。进行统计分析以确定与结果相关的变量。结果:治疗43例患者,共83个病灶。最常见的组织学为平滑肌肉瘤(44%)。最常见的转移部位是肺(84%),其次是肝脏(11%)。处方中位剂量为45 Gy(范围30-56 Gy),分3次(范围2-8)给药,EQD2计划中位CTV平均剂量为309 Gy, α/β = 3 Gy。SBRT治疗1年、2年和5年的局部控制率分别为97%、93%和84%。对于计划平均CTV剂量高于EQD2 278.8 Gy(对应于3组60.3 Gy)的肿瘤,1年、2年和5年局部控制率分别为100%、100%和93%。计划剂量低于EQD2 278.8 Gy (α/β = 3 Gy)的肿瘤,1、2和5年局部控制率分别为90%、70%和52%。高剂量组和低剂量组局部对照的差异有统计学意义(p)。结论:在本分析中,我们发现转移性肉瘤患者具有极好的LC率和有限的副作用。这些结果可能与本研究中使用的SBRT治疗的剂量分布不均匀有关。
{"title":"Improved local control using higher dose SBRT in metastatic sarcoma patients.","authors":"Mattias Hedman, Elia Rossi, Emmy Dalqvist, Kristin Karlsson, Christina Linder-Stragliotto","doi":"10.1186/s13014-025-02719-3","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s13014-025-02719-3","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) has been proven to be a safe and effective alternative to surgery in patients with metastatic primary sarcoma. However, data describing tumor response in relation to the given radiotherapy dose is lacking. Therefore, this study aims at analyzing efficacy and dose-response relationship in a retrospective cohort.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with metastatic sarcoma treated with ablative SBRT and followed up at the Karolinska University Hospital between 2008 and 2021 were included. SBRT was delivered using an inhomogeneous dose distribution resulting in higher median doses within the planning target volume (PTV) than the dose prescribed. Local control (LC), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), adverse events and dose-response relationship were assessed. Statistical analysis was performed to identify variables that correlate to outcome.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-three patients with a total of 83 lesions were treated. The most frequent histology was leiomyosarcoma (44%). The most common site of metastases was the lung (84%), followed by the liver (11%). The median prescription dose was 45 Gy (range 30-56 Gy) delivered in 3 fractions (range 2-8) with a planned median CTV mean dose of 309 Gy in EQD<sub>2</sub> with α/β = 3 Gy. The local control at 1-year, 2-year and 5-year from SBRT treatment was 97, 93 and 84%, respectively. For tumors with a planned mean CTV dose above EQD<sub>2</sub> 278.8 Gy (corresponding to 60.3 Gy in 3 fractions) the 1, 2 and 5-year local control was 100, 100 and 93%, respectively. Tumors planned with a lower dose than EQD<sub>2</sub> 278.8 Gy (α/β = 3 Gy) had a 1, 2 and 5-year local control of 90, 70 and 52%, respectively. The difference in local control between the high dose and low dose groups was statistically significant (p < 0.001). The median OS for all patients was 43 months. When respecting dose constraints, there were only limited number of mild side effects.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this analysis a strongly significant dose-response relationship with excellent LC rates and limited side effects for patients with metastatic lesions of sarcoma were seen. These results could be related to the inhomogeneous dose distribution of SBRT treatments utilized in this study.</p>","PeriodicalId":49639,"journal":{"name":"Radiation Oncology","volume":"20 1","pages":"139"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2025-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12418616/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145024687","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Comparative metabolomic analysis of human lung slices (hu-PCLS) exposed to either standard or FLASH protons: a pilot study. 暴露于标准或FLASH质子的人肺切片(hu-PCLS)的比较代谢组学分析:一项试点研究。
IF 3.3 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-09-02 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-025-02714-8
Anastasia Velalopoulou, Tytus D Mak, Annabella Deziel, Michele M Kim, Constantinos Koumenis, Melpo Christofidou-Solomidou, Evagelia C Laiakis
{"title":"Comparative metabolomic analysis of human lung slices (hu-PCLS) exposed to either standard or FLASH protons: a pilot study.","authors":"Anastasia Velalopoulou, Tytus D Mak, Annabella Deziel, Michele M Kim, Constantinos Koumenis, Melpo Christofidou-Solomidou, Evagelia C Laiakis","doi":"10.1186/s13014-025-02714-8","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s13014-025-02714-8","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":49639,"journal":{"name":"Radiation Oncology","volume":"20 1","pages":"138"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2025-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12403441/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144976250","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Surrogating tumour cell density in head and neck cancer: [18F]FDG PET- versus ADC (MRI)-based approaches. 头颈癌的替代肿瘤细胞密度:[18]FDG PET与ADC (MRI)为基础的方法。
IF 3.3 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-09-01 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-025-02716-6
Athanasios Kafkaletos, Ilias Sachpazidis, Michael Mix, Montserrat Carles, Raluca Stoian, Henning Schäfer, Michael Bock, Dimos Baltas, Anca L Grosu

Objective: In this study we examined the correlation between standardized uptake value (SUV) of [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) within the gross tumor volume (GTV) of patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). In addition, we assessed the comparability of cell density (ρ) estimates obtained from FDG PET and MRI data.

Methods: Twenty-one HNSCC patients from a prospective FMISO imaging trial underwent pre-treatment PET/CT and MRI. We assessed correlations between FDG SUV (mean, max) and ADC (mean, min) within the GTV using Pearson's correlation coefficient. The tumor cell density within the GTV was calculated from FDG SUV and from ADC maps. For the estimation of ADC-based cell density, we used a published tumor cell volume fraction (vTC). Agreement between FDG- and ADC-derived cell density estimates was assessed. The best-fitting vTC* was computed to achieve equal mean ρADC and ρFDG for each patient and was compared to the literature.

Results: The SUV and ADC metrics showed up to moderate negative correlations, but none of them were statistically significant at p < 0.05. The correlation of SUVmean vs. ADCmean with Pearson's correlation coefficient r = -0.426 and p = 0.054 and SUVmax vs. ADCmin with r = -0.414 and p = 0.062 suggested a weak negative trend. The average and standard deviation of mean ρFDG and ρADC across our cohort were (1.8 ± 0.6) × 108 cells/ml and (3.3 ± 0.2) × 108 cells/ml. The difference between the mean ρFDG and ρADC was statistically significant (p < 0.001). To achieve equal mean ρADC and ρFDG for each patient, the mean optimal vTC* with standard deviation was 0.29 ± 0.09. Although significantly lower than the published mean vTC​ (0.54), vTC* lies within the published range of vTC for HNSCCs (0.28 to 0.75).

Conclusion: ADC and SUV metrics exhibited moderate but marginally insignificant correlation in this dataset. Although not directly interchangeable, the two methods provide comparable, clinically relevant cell density estimates, offering flexibility to use the most accessible modality for individualized treatment planning.

Trial registration: Registered at German Clinical Trials Register on 20/08/2015 (DRKS00003830).

目的:本研究探讨了[18F]氟脱氧葡萄糖(FDG)的标准化摄取值(SUV)与头颈部鳞状细胞癌(HNSCC)患者总肿瘤体积(GTV)内表观扩散系数(ADC)的相关性。此外,我们评估了从FDG PET和MRI数据获得的细胞密度(ρ)估计值的可比性。方法:来自前瞻性FMISO成像试验的21例HNSCC患者接受了预处理PET/CT和MRI。我们使用Pearson相关系数评估GTV内FDG SUV(平均值,最大值)与ADC(平均值,最小值)之间的相关性。GTV内的肿瘤细胞密度由FDG SUV和ADC图计算。为了估计基于adc的细胞密度,我们使用了已发表的肿瘤细胞体积分数(vTC)。评估了FDG和adc衍生的细胞密度估计值的一致性。计算最佳拟合vTC*,使每位患者的平均ρADC和ρFDG相等,并与文献进行比较。结果:SUV与ADC指标呈中度负相关,但p mean与ADCmean的Pearson相关系数r = -0.426和p = 0.054均无统计学意义;SUVmax与ADCmin的Pearson相关系数r = -0.414和p = 0.062均呈弱负相关。在整个队列中,平均ρFDG和ρADC的平均值和标准差分别为(1.8±0.6)× 108 cells/ml和(3.3±0.2)× 108 cells/ml。每个患者的平均ρFDG与ρFDG的差异有统计学意义(p ADC与ρFDG),平均最优vTC*标准差为0.29±0.09。虽然远低于公布的平均职涯值(0.54),但职涯值*仍在公布的高级别公务员职涯值范围内(0.28至0.75)。结论:ADC和SUV指标在该数据集中表现出中度但不显著的相关性。虽然不能直接互换,但这两种方法提供了可比较的、临床相关的细胞密度估计,为个性化治疗计划提供了使用最容易获得的方式的灵活性。试验注册:2015年8月20日在德国临床试验注册中心注册(DRKS00003830)。
{"title":"Surrogating tumour cell density in head and neck cancer: [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG PET- versus ADC (MRI)-based approaches.","authors":"Athanasios Kafkaletos, Ilias Sachpazidis, Michael Mix, Montserrat Carles, Raluca Stoian, Henning Schäfer, Michael Bock, Dimos Baltas, Anca L Grosu","doi":"10.1186/s13014-025-02716-6","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s13014-025-02716-6","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>In this study we examined the correlation between standardized uptake value (SUV) of [<sup>18</sup>F]fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) within the gross tumor volume (GTV) of patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). In addition, we assessed the comparability of cell density (ρ) estimates obtained from FDG PET and MRI data.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-one HNSCC patients from a prospective FMISO imaging trial underwent pre-treatment PET/CT and MRI. We assessed correlations between FDG SUV (mean, max) and ADC (mean, min) within the GTV using Pearson's correlation coefficient. The tumor cell density within the GTV was calculated from FDG SUV and from ADC maps. For the estimation of ADC-based cell density, we used a published tumor cell volume fraction (v<sub>TC</sub>). Agreement between FDG- and ADC-derived cell density estimates was assessed. The best-fitting v<sub>TC</sub>* was computed to achieve equal mean ρ<sub>ADC</sub> and ρ<sub>FDG</sub> for each patient and was compared to the literature.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The SUV and ADC metrics showed up to moderate negative correlations, but none of them were statistically significant at p < 0.05. The correlation of SUV<sub>mean</sub> vs. ADC<sub>mean</sub> with Pearson's correlation coefficient r = -0.426 and p = 0.054 and SUV<sub>max</sub> vs. ADC<sub>min</sub> with r = -0.414 and p = 0.062 suggested a weak negative trend. The average and standard deviation of mean ρ<sub>FDG</sub> and ρ<sub>ADC</sub> across our cohort were (1.8 ± 0.6) × 10<sup>8</sup> cells/ml and (3.3 ± 0.2) × 10<sup>8</sup> cells/ml. The difference between the mean ρ<sub>FDG</sub> and ρ<sub>ADC</sub> was statistically significant (p < 0.001). To achieve equal mean ρ<sub>ADC</sub> and ρ<sub>FDG</sub> for each patient, the mean optimal v<sub>TC</sub>* with standard deviation was 0.29 ± 0.09. Although significantly lower than the published mean v<sub>TC</sub>​ (0.54), v<sub>TC</sub>* lies within the published range of v<sub>TC</sub> for HNSCCs (0.28 to 0.75).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ADC and SUV metrics exhibited moderate but marginally insignificant correlation in this dataset. Although not directly interchangeable, the two methods provide comparable, clinically relevant cell density estimates, offering flexibility to use the most accessible modality for individualized treatment planning.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Registered at German Clinical Trials Register on 20/08/2015 (DRKS00003830).</p>","PeriodicalId":49639,"journal":{"name":"Radiation Oncology","volume":"20 1","pages":"137"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12403412/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144976272","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Technical aspects of SBRT for therapy-refractory ventricular tachycardia: a systematic review for radiation oncologists. SBRT治疗难治性室性心动过速的技术方面:放射肿瘤学家的系统综述。
IF 3.3 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-08-29 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-025-02704-w
Alicia Greiner, Lukas Grajewski, Maximilian Römer, Klaus Pietschmann, Georg Wurschi
{"title":"Technical aspects of SBRT for therapy-refractory ventricular tachycardia: a systematic review for radiation oncologists.","authors":"Alicia Greiner, Lukas Grajewski, Maximilian Römer, Klaus Pietschmann, Georg Wurschi","doi":"10.1186/s13014-025-02704-w","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13014-025-02704-w","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":49639,"journal":{"name":"Radiation Oncology","volume":"20 1","pages":"136"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2025-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12395866/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144976293","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Nasopharyngeal cancer adaptive radiotherapy with CBCT-derived synthetic CT: deep learning-based auto-segmentation precision and dose calculation consistency on a C-Arm linac. 基于cbct衍生的合成CT鼻咽癌自适应放疗:基于深度学习的c臂直线上的自动分割精度和剂量计算一致性
IF 3.3 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-08-28 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-025-02715-7
Weijie Lei, Lixiang Han, Zhenmei Cao, Tingting Duan, Bin Wang, Caihong Li, Xi Pei

Background: To evaluate the precision of automated segmentation facilitated by deep learning (DL) and dose calculation in adaptive radiotherapy (ART) for nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC), leveraging synthetic CT (sCT) images derived from cone-beam CT (CBCT) scans on a conventional C-arm linac.

Materials and methods: Sixteen NPC patients undergoing a two-phase offline ART were analyzed retrospectively. The initial (pCT1) and adaptive (pCT2) CT scans served as gold standard alongside weekly acquired CBCT scans. Patient data, including manually delineated contours and dose information, were imported into ArcherQA. Using a cycle-consistent generative adversarial network (cycle-GAN) trained on an independent dataset, sCT images (sCT1, sCT4, sCT4*) were generated from weekly CBCT scans (CBCT1, CBCT4, CBCT4) paired with corresponding planning CTs (pCT1, pCT1, pCT2). Auto-segmentation was performed on sCTs, followed by GPU-accelerated Monte Carlo dose recalculation. Auto-segmentation accuracy was assessed via Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and 95th percentile Hausdorff distance (HD95). Dose calculation fidelity on sCTs was evaluated using dose-volume parameters. Dosimetric consistency between recalculated sCT and pCT plans was analyzed via Spearman's correlation, while volumetric changes were concurrently evaluated to quantify anatomical variations.

Results: Most anatomical structures demonstrated high pCT-sCT agreement, with mean values of DSC > 0.85 and HD95 < 5.10 mm. Notable exceptions included the primary Gross Tumor Volume (GTVp) in the pCT2-sCT4 comparison (DSC: 0.75, HD95: 6.03 mm), involved lymph node (GTVn) showing lower agreement (DSC: 0.43, HD95: 16.42 mm), and submandibular glands with moderate agreement (DSC: 0.64-0.73, HD95: 4.45-5.66 mm). Dosimetric analysis revealed the largest mean differences in GTVn D99: -1.44 Gy (95% CI: [-3.01, 0.13] Gy) and right parotid mean dose: -1.94 Gy (95% CI: [-3.33, -0.55] Gy, p < 0.05). Anatomical variations, quantified via sCTs measurements, correlated significantly with offline adaptive plan adjustments in ART. This correlation was strong for parotid glands (ρ > 0.72, p < 0.001), a result that aligned with sCT-derived dose discrepancy analysis (ρ > 0.57, p < 0.05).

Conclusion: The proposed method exhibited minor variations in volumetric and dosimetric parameters compared to prior treatment data, suggesting potential efficiency improvements for ART in NPC through reduced human dependency.

背景:为了评估深度学习(DL)和剂量计算在鼻咽癌(NPC)自适应放疗(ART)中的自动分割精度,利用传统c臂直线加速器上锥形束CT (CBCT)扫描产生的合成CT (sCT)图像。材料与方法:回顾性分析16例鼻咽癌患者行两期脱机ART治疗。初始(pCT1)和自适应(pCT2) CT扫描与每周获得的CBCT扫描一起作为金标准。患者数据,包括人工勾画的轮廓和剂量信息,被导入ArcherQA。使用在独立数据集上训练的循环一致生成对抗网络(循环gan),将每周CBCT扫描(CBCT1, CBCT4, CBCT4)与相应的规划ct (pCT1, pCT1, pCT2)配对生成sCT图像(sCT1, sCT4, sCT4*)。对sct进行自动分割,然后进行gpu加速蒙特卡罗剂量重新计算。通过Dice相似系数(DSC)和第95百分位Hausdorff距离(HD95)来评估自动分割的准确性。使用剂量-体积参数评估sCTs的剂量计算保真度。通过Spearman相关分析重新计算的sCT和pCT计划之间的剂量一致性,同时评估体积变化以量化解剖变化。结果:大多数解剖结构显示出高的pCT-sCT一致性,DSC为0.85,与HD95 2-sCT4比较的平均值(DSC: 0.75, HD95: 6.03 mm),受病灶淋巴结(GTVn)的一致性较低(DSC: 0.43, HD95: 16.42 mm),下颌腺的一致性中等(DSC: 0.64-0.73, HD95: 4.45-5.66 mm)。剂量学分析显示,GTVn D99的平均差异最大:-1.44 Gy (95% CI: [-3.01, 0.13] Gy),右腮腺的平均剂量为-1.94 Gy (95% CI: [-3.33, -0.55] Gy, p 0.72, p 0.57, p)。结论:与之前的治疗数据相比,所提出的方法在体积和剂量学参数上的变化较小,表明通过减少人类依赖性,可以提高鼻咽癌ART治疗的效率。
{"title":"Nasopharyngeal cancer adaptive radiotherapy with CBCT-derived synthetic CT: deep learning-based auto-segmentation precision and dose calculation consistency on a C-Arm linac.","authors":"Weijie Lei, Lixiang Han, Zhenmei Cao, Tingting Duan, Bin Wang, Caihong Li, Xi Pei","doi":"10.1186/s13014-025-02715-7","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13014-025-02715-7","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To evaluate the precision of automated segmentation facilitated by deep learning (DL) and dose calculation in adaptive radiotherapy (ART) for nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC), leveraging synthetic CT (sCT) images derived from cone-beam CT (CBCT) scans on a conventional C-arm linac.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Sixteen NPC patients undergoing a two-phase offline ART were analyzed retrospectively. The initial (pCT<sub>1</sub>) and adaptive (pCT<sub>2</sub>) CT scans served as gold standard alongside weekly acquired CBCT scans. Patient data, including manually delineated contours and dose information, were imported into ArcherQA. Using a cycle-consistent generative adversarial network (cycle-GAN) trained on an independent dataset, sCT images (sCT<sub>1</sub>, sCT<sub>4</sub>, sCT<sub>4</sub><sup>*</sup>) were generated from weekly CBCT scans (CBCT<sub>1</sub>, CBCT<sub>4</sub>, CBCT<sub>4</sub>) paired with corresponding planning CTs (pCT<sub>1</sub>, pCT<sub>1</sub>, pCT<sub>2</sub>). Auto-segmentation was performed on sCTs, followed by GPU-accelerated Monte Carlo dose recalculation. Auto-segmentation accuracy was assessed via Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and 95th percentile Hausdorff distance (HD<sub>95</sub>). Dose calculation fidelity on sCTs was evaluated using dose-volume parameters. Dosimetric consistency between recalculated sCT and pCT plans was analyzed via Spearman's correlation, while volumetric changes were concurrently evaluated to quantify anatomical variations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most anatomical structures demonstrated high pCT-sCT agreement, with mean values of DSC > 0.85 and HD<sub>95</sub> < 5.10 mm. Notable exceptions included the primary Gross Tumor Volume (GTVp) in the pCT<sub>2</sub>-sCT<sub>4</sub> comparison (DSC: 0.75, HD<sub>95</sub>: 6.03 mm), involved lymph node (GTVn) showing lower agreement (DSC: 0.43, HD<sub>95</sub>: 16.42 mm), and submandibular glands with moderate agreement (DSC: 0.64-0.73, HD<sub>95</sub>: 4.45-5.66 mm). Dosimetric analysis revealed the largest mean differences in GTVn D<sub>99</sub>: -1.44 Gy (95% CI: [-3.01, 0.13] Gy) and right parotid mean dose: -1.94 Gy (95% CI: [-3.33, -0.55] Gy, p < 0.05). Anatomical variations, quantified via sCTs measurements, correlated significantly with offline adaptive plan adjustments in ART. This correlation was strong for parotid glands (ρ > 0.72, p < 0.001), a result that aligned with sCT-derived dose discrepancy analysis (ρ > 0.57, p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The proposed method exhibited minor variations in volumetric and dosimetric parameters compared to prior treatment data, suggesting potential efficiency improvements for ART in NPC through reduced human dependency.</p>","PeriodicalId":49639,"journal":{"name":"Radiation Oncology","volume":"20 1","pages":"135"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2025-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12395649/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144976292","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Comprehensive one-day management of prostate cancer patients: PRO-FAST single-fraction ablative, urethral-sparing, HDR-like, robotic SBRT. 前列腺癌患者一日综合治疗:PRO-FAST单次消融、尿道保留、hdr样、机器人SBRT。
IF 3.3 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-08-27 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-025-02713-9
Andrei Fodor, Laura Giannini, Miriam Torrisi, Chiara Brombin, Sara Broggi, Andrea Losa, Tommaso Maga, Renata Mellone, Carlo Martinenghi, Roberta Tummineri, Paola Mangili, Chiara Lucrezia Deantoni, Alessia Tudda, Roberta Castriconi, Paola Maria Vittoria Rancoita, Mariaclelia Stefania Di Serio, Franco Gaboardi, Claudio Fiorino, Antonella Del Vecchio, Arturo Chiti, Francesco De Cobelli, Nadia Di Muzio

Background: Radiotherapy (RT) is a standard curative treatment for prostate cancer (PCa) and there is growing evidence of the high efficacy of moderate and ultra-hypofractionated RT. Reducing treatment duration to one week or less is a major advance, but very few studies have explored single-fraction therapy. This study evaluates the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of single-fraction stereotactic body RT (SBRT) while delivering the entire procedure in one day, with a potentially high benefit in terms of patient comfort and therapy cost and logistics.

Methods: This prospective, non-randomized monocentric trial uses Robotic Radiosurgery (CyberKnife v.7 system) to deliver a single 24 Gy fraction to the prostate (± seminal vesicles) with a "urethral sparing HDR-like" technique, and target tracking. The first phase will enroll 13 PCa patients following Simon's optimal design. Treatment is to be stopped if ≥ 2 patients develop ≥ G3 toxicity (CTCAE v5.0) within a month from RT end; otherwise, 52 more patients will be added, totaling 65. To account for minimal drop-out, 5 extra patients will be enrolled, reaching 70. All procedures are performed in a single day, including fiducial implantation, imaging acquisition, contouring, planning, dosimetry quality control, and treatment. Apart from treatment feasibility in terms of one-month acute toxicity, secondary endpoints include late toxicity, biochemical and clinical control.

Discussion: Few others have investigated the 24 Gy single-fraction schedule using different delivery modalities (not including tracking), which has proved to be non-inferior to 5 fraction SBRT. Our approach aims to maintain (and possibly improve) the previously reported acute, subacute and late toxicity as well as disease control, adding evidence in favor of single-fraction delivery. Another significant goal of the study is the demonstration that all the complex treatment procedures can be safely delivered in a single day. This would be especially appealing for patients far from radiotherapy centers and those with work commitments not allowing daily hospital visits. The study of response to RT can also provide useful information about PCa radiobiology. Planned additional analyses may help in better assessing the clinical value of PSMA PET/CT in the selection of high-risk patients with true limited disease, and in identifying radiomic features associated to outcome.

Trial registration: The study was prospectively registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT05936736).

背景:放疗(RT)是前列腺癌(PCa)的一种标准治疗方法,越来越多的证据表明,中度和超低分割放疗的疗效很高。将治疗时间缩短至一周或更短是一项重大进展,但很少有研究探索单一分割治疗。本研究评估了单部分立体定向体RT (SBRT)的可行性、安全性和有效性,同时在一天内完成整个过程,在患者舒适度、治疗成本和后勤方面具有潜在的高效益。方法:这项前瞻性、非随机单中心试验使用机器人放射外科(射波刀v.7系统)通过“尿道保留hdr样”技术向前列腺(±精囊)输送单个24 Gy的碎片,并进行目标跟踪。第一阶段将按照Simon的最佳设计招募13名PCa患者。如果≥2例患者在治疗结束后一个月内出现≥G3毒性(CTCAE v5.0),则停止治疗;否则,将增加52名患者,总计65名。考虑到最小的退出率,将额外招收5名患者,达到70名。所有程序在一天内完成,包括基准植入、成像采集、轮廓、计划、剂量学、质量控制和治疗。除1个月急性毒性方面的治疗可行性外,次要终点包括晚期毒性、生化和临床控制。讨论:很少有人使用不同的给药方式(不包括跟踪)研究24 Gy单组分计划,其已被证明不逊色于5组分SBRT。我们的方法旨在维持(并可能改善)先前报道的急性、亚急性和晚期毒性以及疾病控制,增加支持单组分给药的证据。这项研究的另一个重要目标是证明所有复杂的治疗程序都可以在一天内安全完成。这对远离放射治疗中心的病人和那些有工作不能每天去医院的病人尤其有吸引力。对放疗反应的研究也可以为前列腺癌放射生物学提供有用的信息。计划中的其他分析可能有助于更好地评估PSMA PET/CT在选择真正局限性疾病的高风险患者中的临床价值,并确定与结果相关的放射学特征。试验注册:该研究在clinicaltrials.gov (NCT05936736)前瞻性注册。
{"title":"Comprehensive one-day management of prostate cancer patients: PRO-FAST single-fraction ablative, urethral-sparing, HDR-like, robotic SBRT.","authors":"Andrei Fodor, Laura Giannini, Miriam Torrisi, Chiara Brombin, Sara Broggi, Andrea Losa, Tommaso Maga, Renata Mellone, Carlo Martinenghi, Roberta Tummineri, Paola Mangili, Chiara Lucrezia Deantoni, Alessia Tudda, Roberta Castriconi, Paola Maria Vittoria Rancoita, Mariaclelia Stefania Di Serio, Franco Gaboardi, Claudio Fiorino, Antonella Del Vecchio, Arturo Chiti, Francesco De Cobelli, Nadia Di Muzio","doi":"10.1186/s13014-025-02713-9","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s13014-025-02713-9","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Radiotherapy (RT) is a standard curative treatment for prostate cancer (PCa) and there is growing evidence of the high efficacy of moderate and ultra-hypofractionated RT. Reducing treatment duration to one week or less is a major advance, but very few studies have explored single-fraction therapy. This study evaluates the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of single-fraction stereotactic body RT (SBRT) while delivering the entire procedure in one day, with a potentially high benefit in terms of patient comfort and therapy cost and logistics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective, non-randomized monocentric trial uses Robotic Radiosurgery (CyberKnife v.7 system) to deliver a single 24 Gy fraction to the prostate (± seminal vesicles) with a \"urethral sparing HDR-like\" technique, and target tracking. The first phase will enroll 13 PCa patients following Simon's optimal design. Treatment is to be stopped if ≥ 2 patients develop ≥ G3 toxicity (CTCAE v5.0) within a month from RT end; otherwise, 52 more patients will be added, totaling 65. To account for minimal drop-out, 5 extra patients will be enrolled, reaching 70. All procedures are performed in a single day, including fiducial implantation, imaging acquisition, contouring, planning, dosimetry quality control, and treatment. Apart from treatment feasibility in terms of one-month acute toxicity, secondary endpoints include late toxicity, biochemical and clinical control.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Few others have investigated the 24 Gy single-fraction schedule using different delivery modalities (not including tracking), which has proved to be non-inferior to 5 fraction SBRT. Our approach aims to maintain (and possibly improve) the previously reported acute, subacute and late toxicity as well as disease control, adding evidence in favor of single-fraction delivery. Another significant goal of the study is the demonstration that all the complex treatment procedures can be safely delivered in a single day. This would be especially appealing for patients far from radiotherapy centers and those with work commitments not allowing daily hospital visits. The study of response to RT can also provide useful information about PCa radiobiology. Planned additional analyses may help in better assessing the clinical value of PSMA PET/CT in the selection of high-risk patients with true limited disease, and in identifying radiomic features associated to outcome.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>The study was prospectively registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT05936736).</p>","PeriodicalId":49639,"journal":{"name":"Radiation Oncology","volume":"20 1","pages":"134"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2025-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12392665/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144976303","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Use of PULSAR (personalized ultra-fractionated stereotactic adaptive radiotherapy) as consolidation with immune checkpoint inhibition in the treatment of pediatric metastatic melanoma. 使用PULSAR(个性化超分割立体定向适应性放疗)巩固免疫检查点抑制治疗儿童转移性黑色素瘤。
IF 3.3 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-08-21 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-025-02691-y
Kyra L McCarty, Tanya Watt, Tu D Dan, Robert D Timmerman, Kiran A Kumar

We present a case of extensive and bulky pediatric metastatic melanoma originating in the head and neck which markedly responded to combination therapy with anti-programmed cell death (PD-1) inhibition and consolidative personalized ultra-fractionated stereotactic adaptive radiotherapy (PULSAR). After surgical debulking with neck dissection, the patient was initially treated with anti-PD-1 and anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte associated protein 4 (CTLA-4) dual checkpoint blockade immunotherapy, but quickly had disease progression. He was transitioned to a different anti-PD-1 immunotherapy in combination with tyrosine kinase inhibitors in conjunction with consolidative local therapy using PULSAR. This combination therapy achieved tumor response and progression-free status for one year before further disease progression at a separate site in the mediastinum. Due to otherwise good disease control, single agent anti-PD-1 immunotherapy was continued and salvage PULSAR was administered to the progressive site, again resulting in tumor response and progression-free status for 6 months. None of the bulkier sites of gross disease had local progression after combination therapy. This case suggests that the synergistic effect of PULSAR and anti-PD-1 immunotherapy is efficacious for relapsed or refractory metastatic melanoma in pediatric patients. Clinical trial number: not applicable.

我们报告了一例起源于头部和颈部的广泛而庞大的儿童转移性黑色素瘤,该病例对抗程序性细胞死亡(PD-1)抑制和巩固的个性化超分割立体定向适应性放疗(PULSAR)联合治疗有明显反应。手术切除颈部后,患者最初接受抗pd -1和抗细胞毒性t淋巴细胞相关蛋白4 (CTLA-4)双检查点阻断免疫治疗,但很快疾病进展。他被转移到一种不同的抗pd -1免疫疗法,与酪氨酸激酶抑制剂联合使用PULSAR巩固局部治疗。这种联合治疗在纵隔的另一个部位进一步疾病进展之前达到了肿瘤缓解和无进展状态一年。由于其他方面疾病控制良好,继续进行单药抗pd -1免疫治疗,并对进展部位给予补救性PULSAR,再次导致肿瘤反应和6个月的无进展状态。在联合治疗后,没有较大部位的大体病变出现局部进展。本病例提示,PULSAR联合抗pd -1免疫治疗对小儿复发或难治性转移性黑色素瘤是有效的。临床试验号:不适用。
{"title":"Use of PULSAR (personalized ultra-fractionated stereotactic adaptive radiotherapy) as consolidation with immune checkpoint inhibition in the treatment of pediatric metastatic melanoma.","authors":"Kyra L McCarty, Tanya Watt, Tu D Dan, Robert D Timmerman, Kiran A Kumar","doi":"10.1186/s13014-025-02691-y","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13014-025-02691-y","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We present a case of extensive and bulky pediatric metastatic melanoma originating in the head and neck which markedly responded to combination therapy with anti-programmed cell death (PD-1) inhibition and consolidative personalized ultra-fractionated stereotactic adaptive radiotherapy (PULSAR). After surgical debulking with neck dissection, the patient was initially treated with anti-PD-1 and anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte associated protein 4 (CTLA-4) dual checkpoint blockade immunotherapy, but quickly had disease progression. He was transitioned to a different anti-PD-1 immunotherapy in combination with tyrosine kinase inhibitors in conjunction with consolidative local therapy using PULSAR. This combination therapy achieved tumor response and progression-free status for one year before further disease progression at a separate site in the mediastinum. Due to otherwise good disease control, single agent anti-PD-1 immunotherapy was continued and salvage PULSAR was administered to the progressive site, again resulting in tumor response and progression-free status for 6 months. None of the bulkier sites of gross disease had local progression after combination therapy. This case suggests that the synergistic effect of PULSAR and anti-PD-1 immunotherapy is efficacious for relapsed or refractory metastatic melanoma in pediatric patients. Clinical trial number: not applicable.</p>","PeriodicalId":49639,"journal":{"name":"Radiation Oncology","volume":"20 1","pages":"132"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2025-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12369228/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144976429","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Radiation Oncology
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1