首页 > 最新文献

Radiation Oncology最新文献

英文 中文
Magnetic resonance imaging-guided radiotherapy for portal vein tumor thrombus in hepatocellular carcinoma: outcomes and prognostic factors. 磁共振成像引导放射治疗肝癌门静脉肿瘤血栓:结果和预后因素。
IF 3.3 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-09-30 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-025-02717-5
So Jung Lee, Myungsoo Kim

Background: High-dose prescribed radiotherapy has been attempted to improve local control and restore portal vein in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) complicated with portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT). The aim of this study was to evaluate feasibility of real-time tumor-tracking magnetic resonance imaging-guided radiotherapy (rtMRgRT) for PVTT in HCC. In addition, prognostic factors for overall survival (OS) and progression pattern after radiotherapy (RT) were analyzed.

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the data of 34 patients who had unresectable HCC complicated with PVTT and who were treated with rtMRgRT using hypofractionated radiotherapy (HFRT) and stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) between June 2019 and October 2023. HFRT was performed with a total of 50-60 Gy in 10 fractions, and SBRT was performed in a range of 36-50 Gy in 4-5 fractions. The median biologic effective dose with an a/b ratio of 10 was 100 Gy10 (range: 68.4-100 Gy10).

Results: Twenty-one patients (61.7%) had an objective response (complete response and partial response) to PVTT; the 1-year estimated local control rate was 77.7%. The median progression-free survival and OS were 5.2 and 10.6 months, respectively. The predominant initial pattern of progressive disease after RT was outfield intrahepatic progression (21/29 cases, 72.4%). RT responder (hazard ratio [HR], 0.33; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.12-0.88; p = 0.026) and combined transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) within 1-month post-RT (HR, 0.24; 95% CI, 0.08-0.73; p = 0.012) were favorable prognostic factors for OS.

Conclusions: The rtMRgRT demonstrated feasibility in treatment of PVTT with favorable overall response and local control. Response to RT and combined TACE within a month post-RT were favorable prognostic factors for OS. Given the predominant patterns of disease progression after RT, timely management of HCC outside RT field may be crucial for enhancing the survival of patients with PVTT undergoing RT. The early combination of TACE within a month post-RT may be beneficial in this regard. Further prospective studies are needed to determine the optimal sequencing and timing for combining RT and other local therapies in patients with PVTT.

背景:高剂量处方放疗已被尝试用于改善肝细胞癌合并门静脉肿瘤血栓(PVTT)患者的局部控制和门静脉恢复。本研究的目的是评估实时肿瘤跟踪磁共振成像引导放疗(rtMRgRT)治疗肝癌PVTT的可行性。此外,还分析了影响总生存期(OS)和放疗后进展模式(RT)的预后因素。方法:我们回顾性回顾了2019年6月至2023年10月期间34例不可切除的HCC合并PVTT并接受rtMRgRT治疗的患者的资料,这些患者使用了低分割放疗(HFRT)和立体定向体放射治疗(SBRT)。HFRT的总剂量为50-60 Gy,分为10组;SBRT的剂量范围为36-50 Gy,分为4-5组。a/b比为10的中位生物有效剂量为100 Gy10(范围:68.4-100 Gy10)。结果:PVTT客观缓解(完全缓解和部分缓解)21例(61.7%);1年估计当地控制率为77.7%。中位无进展生存期和OS分别为5.2和10.6个月。放疗后疾病进展的主要初始模式是肝内进展(21/29例,72.4%)。RT反应(风险比[HR], 0.33; 95%可信区间[CI], 0.12-0.88; p = 0.026)和RT后1个月内联合经动脉化疗栓塞(TACE) (HR, 0.24; 95% CI, 0.08-0.73; p = 0.012)是OS的有利预后因素。结论:rtMRgRT治疗PVTT是可行的,具有良好的整体疗效和局部控制。对放疗的反应和放疗后一个月内的联合TACE是OS的有利预后因素。考虑到RT后疾病进展的主要模式,及时治疗RT外的HCC可能对提高PVTT患者接受RT的生存率至关重要。在此方面,RT后一个月内早期联合TACE可能是有益的。需要进一步的前瞻性研究来确定PVTT患者联合放疗和其他局部治疗的最佳顺序和时机。
{"title":"Magnetic resonance imaging-guided radiotherapy for portal vein tumor thrombus in hepatocellular carcinoma: outcomes and prognostic factors.","authors":"So Jung Lee, Myungsoo Kim","doi":"10.1186/s13014-025-02717-5","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s13014-025-02717-5","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>High-dose prescribed radiotherapy has been attempted to improve local control and restore portal vein in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) complicated with portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT). The aim of this study was to evaluate feasibility of real-time tumor-tracking magnetic resonance imaging-guided radiotherapy (rtMRgRT) for PVTT in HCC. In addition, prognostic factors for overall survival (OS) and progression pattern after radiotherapy (RT) were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively reviewed the data of 34 patients who had unresectable HCC complicated with PVTT and who were treated with rtMRgRT using hypofractionated radiotherapy (HFRT) and stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) between June 2019 and October 2023. HFRT was performed with a total of 50-60 Gy in 10 fractions, and SBRT was performed in a range of 36-50 Gy in 4-5 fractions. The median biologic effective dose with an a/b ratio of 10 was 100 Gy<sub>10</sub> (range: 68.4-100 Gy<sub>10</sub>).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-one patients (61.7%) had an objective response (complete response and partial response) to PVTT; the 1-year estimated local control rate was 77.7%. The median progression-free survival and OS were 5.2 and 10.6 months, respectively. The predominant initial pattern of progressive disease after RT was outfield intrahepatic progression (21/29 cases, 72.4%). RT responder (hazard ratio [HR], 0.33; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.12-0.88; p = 0.026) and combined transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) within 1-month post-RT (HR, 0.24; 95% CI, 0.08-0.73; p = 0.012) were favorable prognostic factors for OS.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The rtMRgRT demonstrated feasibility in treatment of PVTT with favorable overall response and local control. Response to RT and combined TACE within a month post-RT were favorable prognostic factors for OS. Given the predominant patterns of disease progression after RT, timely management of HCC outside RT field may be crucial for enhancing the survival of patients with PVTT undergoing RT. The early combination of TACE within a month post-RT may be beneficial in this regard. Further prospective studies are needed to determine the optimal sequencing and timing for combining RT and other local therapies in patients with PVTT.</p>","PeriodicalId":49639,"journal":{"name":"Radiation Oncology","volume":"20 1","pages":"144"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2025-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12486710/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145201943","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Fiducial tracking fidelity in robotic prostate SBRT: a comparison of a 3-fraction boost following pelvic nodal irradiation and definitive 5-fraction treatment. 机器人前列腺SBRT的基准跟踪保真度:盆腔淋巴结照射和最终5分治疗后3分提高的比较
IF 3.3 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-09-30 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-025-02654-3
Jonathan W Lischalk, Vianca F Santos, Brianna Vizcaino, Andwele Murray, Astrid Sanchez, Christopher Mendez, Todd Carpenter, Joseph Kim, Owen Clancey, Scot Niglio, Aaron Katz, Anthony Corcoran, Anand Mahadevan, Jonathan A Haas

Purpose: Pelvic nodal irradiation is often used for high-risk prostate adenocarcinoma. A commonly used alternative to low dose rate (LDR) brachytherapy, a 3-fraction SBRT boost with fiducial tracking may allow for better coverage of extracapsular extension and macroscopic seminal vesicle invasion. This study evaluates the practical impact of prior pelvic nodal irradiation on fiducial tracking during a subsequent 3-fraction robotic stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) boost for high-risk prostate cancer and compares these outcomes to a cohort of patients undergoing definitive 5-fraction SBRT.

Methods: In this institutional analysis, we prospectively collected fiducial tracking data for patients receiving a 3-fraction boost to the prostate and seminal vesicles after conventional nodal radiation. We also identified patients treated with 5-fraction SBRT with a low risk of nodal involvement. Monte Carlo estimates of the Fisher's Exact Test assessed fiducial tracking loss. Continuous variables within the 5- and 3-fraction cohorts were compared using the Mann-Whitney Test. Changes in fiducial tracking and their association with pre-treatment factors were analyzed through the Kruskal-Wallis test and Monte Carlo for tracking patterns, and Spearman Correlation Coefficient and Mann-Whitney Test for deviations in tracking over 5 fractions.

Results: A total of 405 patients were treated from April 2021 to September 2023 with: (1) 5-fraction SBRT (n = 309, 76%), and (2) 3-fraction boost after nodal irradiation (n = 96, 24%). There was no significant fiducial tracking loss over the three-fraction boost treatment regimen that proceeded nodal treatment (p = 0.63). However, there was a significant (p < 0.001) loss of fiducial tracking fidelity as demonstrated by progressive loss of one tracked fiducial over 5-fractions. There was significantly more volatility observed in the 5-fraction versus 3-fraction boost treatment (median volatility 2.4 vs. 0.0, p < 0.001). There were no significant associations between fiducial tracking, independently for 3- or 5-fractions, using either analysis method or volatility for ADT, time from fiducial placement to SBRT, CTV, and QOD vs. daily SBRT.

Conclusions: Pelvic nodal treatment does not affect the quantity/quality of fiducial tracking in 3-fraction treatments. However, 5-fraction treatments showed a progressive loss and increased volatility in fiducial tracking over time. No pre-treatment factors significantly influenced fiducial tracking changes in either cohort, though ADT use trended towards increased volatility in the 5-fraction group. With a minimum of 4 fiducials placed for treatment, the loss/volatility of a single fiducial had no clinical impact on the tracking system.

目的:盆腔淋巴结放射治疗是治疗高危前列腺癌的常用方法。作为低剂量率(LDR)近距离治疗的常用替代方案,3分次SBRT增强与基准跟踪可以更好地覆盖囊外延伸和宏观精囊侵犯。本研究评估了先前盆腔淋巴结照射对高危前列腺癌后续机器人立体定向放射治疗(SBRT)中基线跟踪的实际影响,并将这些结果与接受确定的5分位SBRT的患者队列进行了比较。方法:在这项机构分析中,我们前瞻性地收集了在常规淋巴结放疗后接受前列腺和精囊3分位增强治疗的患者的基准跟踪数据。我们还发现了接受5分SBRT治疗的患者,其淋巴结受累性风险较低。蒙特卡罗估计费雪精确检验评估基准跟踪损失。使用曼-惠特尼检验比较5分和3分队列中的连续变量。通过跟踪模式的Kruskal-Wallis检验和Monte Carlo检验,以及跟踪超过5个分数的偏差的Spearman相关系数和Mann-Whitney检验,分析基准跟踪的变化及其与预处理因素的关联。结果:从2021年4月到2023年9月,共有405例患者接受了治疗:(1)5分次SBRT (n = 309, 76%),(2)淋巴结照射后3分次增强(n = 96, 24%)。在进行淋巴结治疗的三段式强化治疗方案中,没有明显的基准跟踪损失(p = 0.63)。结论:在三段式治疗中,盆腔淋巴结治疗不影响基准跟踪的数量/质量。然而,随着时间的推移,5组分治疗显示出进行性损失和基准跟踪的波动性增加。两组的治疗前因素均未显著影响基准跟踪变化,但在5分组中ADT的使用有增加波动性的趋势。至少放置了4个治疗基准,单个基准的丢失/波动对跟踪系统没有临床影响。
{"title":"Fiducial tracking fidelity in robotic prostate SBRT: a comparison of a 3-fraction boost following pelvic nodal irradiation and definitive 5-fraction treatment.","authors":"Jonathan W Lischalk, Vianca F Santos, Brianna Vizcaino, Andwele Murray, Astrid Sanchez, Christopher Mendez, Todd Carpenter, Joseph Kim, Owen Clancey, Scot Niglio, Aaron Katz, Anthony Corcoran, Anand Mahadevan, Jonathan A Haas","doi":"10.1186/s13014-025-02654-3","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s13014-025-02654-3","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Pelvic nodal irradiation is often used for high-risk prostate adenocarcinoma. A commonly used alternative to low dose rate (LDR) brachytherapy, a 3-fraction SBRT boost with fiducial tracking may allow for better coverage of extracapsular extension and macroscopic seminal vesicle invasion. This study evaluates the practical impact of prior pelvic nodal irradiation on fiducial tracking during a subsequent 3-fraction robotic stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) boost for high-risk prostate cancer and compares these outcomes to a cohort of patients undergoing definitive 5-fraction SBRT.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this institutional analysis, we prospectively collected fiducial tracking data for patients receiving a 3-fraction boost to the prostate and seminal vesicles after conventional nodal radiation. We also identified patients treated with 5-fraction SBRT with a low risk of nodal involvement. Monte Carlo estimates of the Fisher's Exact Test assessed fiducial tracking loss. Continuous variables within the 5- and 3-fraction cohorts were compared using the Mann-Whitney Test. Changes in fiducial tracking and their association with pre-treatment factors were analyzed through the Kruskal-Wallis test and Monte Carlo for tracking patterns, and Spearman Correlation Coefficient and Mann-Whitney Test for deviations in tracking over 5 fractions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 405 patients were treated from April 2021 to September 2023 with: (1) 5-fraction SBRT (n = 309, 76%), and (2) 3-fraction boost after nodal irradiation (n = 96, 24%). There was no significant fiducial tracking loss over the three-fraction boost treatment regimen that proceeded nodal treatment (p = 0.63). However, there was a significant (p < 0.001) loss of fiducial tracking fidelity as demonstrated by progressive loss of one tracked fiducial over 5-fractions. There was significantly more volatility observed in the 5-fraction versus 3-fraction boost treatment (median volatility 2.4 vs. 0.0, p < 0.001). There were no significant associations between fiducial tracking, independently for 3- or 5-fractions, using either analysis method or volatility for ADT, time from fiducial placement to SBRT, CTV, and QOD vs. daily SBRT.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Pelvic nodal treatment does not affect the quantity/quality of fiducial tracking in 3-fraction treatments. However, 5-fraction treatments showed a progressive loss and increased volatility in fiducial tracking over time. No pre-treatment factors significantly influenced fiducial tracking changes in either cohort, though ADT use trended towards increased volatility in the 5-fraction group. With a minimum of 4 fiducials placed for treatment, the loss/volatility of a single fiducial had no clinical impact on the tracking system.</p>","PeriodicalId":49639,"journal":{"name":"Radiation Oncology","volume":"20 1","pages":"145"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2025-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12487326/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145201882","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Efficacy and safety of stereotactic body radiotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma with tumor thrombus in right atrium: a two-center retrospective review. 立体定向体放疗治疗肝细胞癌伴右心房肿瘤血栓的疗效和安全性:一项双中心回顾性评价。
IF 3.3 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-09-30 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-025-02698-5
Yongjie Shui, Jia Yang, Xianzhi Zhao, Yang Yang, Chunshan Yu, Dongjun Dai, Liang Chen, Haiyan Chen, Di Chen, Xia Li, Lihong Liu, Qiaoying Tian, Yinglu Guo, Huojun Zhang, Qichun Wei
{"title":"Efficacy and safety of stereotactic body radiotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma with tumor thrombus in right atrium: a two-center retrospective review.","authors":"Yongjie Shui, Jia Yang, Xianzhi Zhao, Yang Yang, Chunshan Yu, Dongjun Dai, Liang Chen, Haiyan Chen, Di Chen, Xia Li, Lihong Liu, Qiaoying Tian, Yinglu Guo, Huojun Zhang, Qichun Wei","doi":"10.1186/s13014-025-02698-5","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s13014-025-02698-5","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":49639,"journal":{"name":"Radiation Oncology","volume":"20 1","pages":"146"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2025-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12487014/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145201920","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Optimization and characterization of acute radiation-induced esophagitis in mice. 小鼠急性辐射性食管炎的优化与表征。
IF 3.3 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-09-30 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-025-02720-w
Jianhua Feng, Xiangjun Liu, Lu Xu, Ke Wang, Simin He, Xi Wang, Yujun Huang, Shubin Wang, Xudan Lei, Lingxiao Huang, Zhenni Xu, Jinyi Lang, Dengqun Liu, Jun Yin

Purpose: To optimize an animal model of acute radiation-induced esophagitis (RIE) in C57BL/6 mice and characterize the histopathological features of RIE at different stages.

Materials and methods: C57BL/6 mice were subjected to single thoracic X-ray irradiation at doses ranging from 5 to 30 Gy. Changes in body weight, daily food and water intake, and survival were monitored and compared within 2 weeks after radiation exposure. Epithelial damage to the esophagus, apoptosis, and inflammation at different times after irradiation were examined to characterize the pathological process of RIE.

Results: The incidence of acute RIE was strongly correlated with increasing radiation dose across all the experimental groups. No deaths were observed in mice that received 5 or 10 Gy of irradiation, whereas complete mortality was observed within 15 days after exposure to 30 Gy of irradiation. The mice in 20 Gy irradiation group had a low mortality rate. The peak of esophageal tissue damage occurred at Day 7 and was healed by Day 14 after exposure to 20 Gy of thoracic irradiation. The pathology of RIE was induced by radiation-induced DNA damage, apoptosis, reactive oxygen species (ROS), and mitochondrial impairment.

Conclusions: In this study, we found that a single 20 Gy thoracic irradiation was the optimal dose to establish acute RIE in C57BL/6 mice. Acute esophageal injury peaked on Day 7 after radiation, and the process of regeneration and repair was complete within 14 days. This work may be a useful reference for experimental research concerning RIE.

目的:优化C57BL/6小鼠急性放射性食管炎(RIE)动物模型,探讨RIE不同阶段的组织病理学特征。材料和方法:对C57BL/6小鼠进行5 ~ 30 Gy单次胸部x线照射。监测和比较辐射照射后2周内体重、每日食物和水摄入量以及生存的变化。通过观察辐照后不同时间食管上皮损伤、细胞凋亡和炎症的变化,探讨RIE的病理过程。结果:在所有实验组中,急性RIE的发生率与辐射剂量的增加密切相关。在接受5或10戈瑞辐射的小鼠中未观察到死亡,而在接受30戈瑞辐射后15天内观察到完全死亡。20 Gy辐照组小鼠死亡率低。20 Gy胸部辐照后第7天食管组织损伤达到高峰,第14天愈合。辐射诱导的DNA损伤、细胞凋亡、活性氧(ROS)和线粒体损伤诱发了RIE的病理变化。结论:在本研究中,我们发现单次20 Gy胸部照射是C57BL/6小鼠建立急性RIE的最佳剂量。急性食管损伤在放疗后第7天达到高峰,14天内完成再生修复过程。本研究为RIE的实验研究提供了有益的参考。
{"title":"Optimization and characterization of acute radiation-induced esophagitis in mice.","authors":"Jianhua Feng, Xiangjun Liu, Lu Xu, Ke Wang, Simin He, Xi Wang, Yujun Huang, Shubin Wang, Xudan Lei, Lingxiao Huang, Zhenni Xu, Jinyi Lang, Dengqun Liu, Jun Yin","doi":"10.1186/s13014-025-02720-w","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s13014-025-02720-w","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To optimize an animal model of acute radiation-induced esophagitis (RIE) in C57BL/6 mice and characterize the histopathological features of RIE at different stages.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>C57BL/6 mice were subjected to single thoracic X-ray irradiation at doses ranging from 5 to 30 Gy. Changes in body weight, daily food and water intake, and survival were monitored and compared within 2 weeks after radiation exposure. Epithelial damage to the esophagus, apoptosis, and inflammation at different times after irradiation were examined to characterize the pathological process of RIE.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The incidence of acute RIE was strongly correlated with increasing radiation dose across all the experimental groups. No deaths were observed in mice that received 5 or 10 Gy of irradiation, whereas complete mortality was observed within 15 days after exposure to 30 Gy of irradiation. The mice in 20 Gy irradiation group had a low mortality rate. The peak of esophageal tissue damage occurred at Day 7 and was healed by Day 14 after exposure to 20 Gy of thoracic irradiation. The pathology of RIE was induced by radiation-induced DNA damage, apoptosis, reactive oxygen species (ROS), and mitochondrial impairment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this study, we found that a single 20 Gy thoracic irradiation was the optimal dose to establish acute RIE in C57BL/6 mice. Acute esophageal injury peaked on Day 7 after radiation, and the process of regeneration and repair was complete within 14 days. This work may be a useful reference for experimental research concerning RIE.</p>","PeriodicalId":49639,"journal":{"name":"Radiation Oncology","volume":"20 1","pages":"147"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2025-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12487394/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145202042","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
SSTR PET/CT for skull base low-grade meningioma: a critical tool for accurate gross tumor volume delineation in radiotherapy? 颅底低级别脑膜瘤的SSTR PET/CT:放射治疗中精确大体肿瘤体积描绘的关键工具?
IF 3.3 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-09-22 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-025-02718-4
Frederik Fuchs, Sebastian N Marschner, Jan Hofmaier, Maya Rottler, Indra Hadi, Sebastian H Maier, Tobias Greve, Adrien Holzgreve, Nathalie L Albert, Raphael Bodensohn, Claus Belka, Maximilian Niyazi, Franziska Walter

Background: Precise delineation of gross tumor volume (GTV) is fundamental for effective radiation therapy in low-grade skull base meningiomas. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) serves as the primary imaging tool but may not fully represent tumor extent. This study investigates the additional value of incorporating Somatostatin receptor (SSTR)-directed PET/CT in radiation therapy planning.

Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted with four experienced radiation oncologists contouring GTVs for skull base meningiomas using MRI alone (GTV_MRI), PET/CT alone (GTV_PET/CT), and both modalities combined (GTV_ALL). Consensus ground truth volumes were generated for each modality through a STAPLE algorithm. Agreement between modalities, excluding observer variability, was assessed using statistical metrics including Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC), Jaccard Index (JCI), Hausdorff distance (HD95), Geographical Miss Index (GMI), sensitivity, and kappa statistics.

Results: The study included 25 patients (15 females, 10 males; median age 56 years (range: 23-74 years), with 96% achieving local control post-radiotherapy over a median follow-up of 64 months (range: 28-135 months). Substantial interobserver agreement was observed, with median kappa values of 0.74 for GTV_MRI, 0.68 for GTV_PET/CT, and 0.77 for GTV_ALL. Median consensus volumes were 6.65 cc (MRISTAPLE), 7.21 cc (PETSTAPLE), and 6.73 cc (ALLSTAPLE). The median GMI for MRISTAPLE compared to ALLSTAPLE was 0.18 (IQR: 0.11-0.39), and 0.21 (IQR: 0.15-0.28) for PETSTAPLE compared to ALLSTAPLE. The DSC indicated the lowest concordance between MRISTAPLE and PETSTAPLE with a median of 0.75 (IQR: 0.59-0.82), followed by PETSTAPLE versus ALLSTAPLE with a median DSC of 0.84 (IQR: 0.79-0.89), and MRISTAPLE versus ALLSTAPLE with a median DSC of 0.89 (IQR: 0.76-0.92). The integration of PET/CT with MRI significantly enhanced concordance metrics.

Conclusion: Combining MRI and PET/CT improves GTV delineation in low-grade skull base meningiomas, as PET/CT can reveal regions missed by MRI, which may slightly underestimate tumor size. This multimodal imaging approach enhances consensus and supports its role in radiotherapy planning. Standardized protocols and technical integration remain key future goals.

背景:准确描绘总肿瘤体积(GTV)是低级别颅底脑膜瘤有效放射治疗的基础。磁共振成像(MRI)是主要的成像工具,但可能不能完全代表肿瘤的范围。本研究探讨了结合生长抑素受体(SSTR)定向PET/CT在放射治疗计划中的附加价值。方法:回顾性分析4名经验丰富的放射肿瘤学家分别使用MRI (GTV_MRI)、PET/CT (GTV_PET/CT)和两种方式联合(GTV_ALL)对颅底脑膜瘤进行gtv轮廓的临床资料。通过STAPLE算法为每种模态生成共识基础真量。采用统计指标,包括Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC)、Jaccard Index (JCI)、Hausdorff distance (HD95)、Geographical Miss Index (GMI)、sensitivity(灵敏度)和kappa statistics,评估模式之间的一致性,排除观察者的可变性。结果:本研究纳入25例患者,其中女性15例,男性10例,中位年龄56岁(范围23-74岁),96%患者放疗后局部控制,中位随访64个月(范围28-135个月)。观察到大量观察者之间的一致,GTV_MRI的中位kappa值为0.74,GTV_PET/CT为0.68,GTV_ALL为0.77。中位共识容积为6.65 cc (mrristaple)、7.21 cc (PETSTAPLE)和6.73 cc (ALLSTAPLE)。与ALLSTAPLE相比,mri的中位GMI为0.18 (IQR: 0.11-0.39), PETSTAPLE与ALLSTAPLE的中位GMI为0.21 (IQR: 0.15-0.28)。DSC显示,mri与PETSTAPLE的一致性最低,中位数为0.75 (IQR: 0.59-0.82),其次是PETSTAPLE与ALLSTAPLE的中位数DSC为0.84 (IQR: 0.79-0.89), mri与ALLSTAPLE的中位数DSC为0.89 (IQR: 0.76-0.92)。PET/CT与MRI的整合显著增强了一致性指标。结论:MRI与PET/CT结合可以改善低级别颅底脑膜瘤的GTV描绘,因为PET/CT可以显示MRI遗漏的区域,可能略低估肿瘤大小。这种多模态成像方法增强了共识,并支持其在放疗计划中的作用。标准化协议和技术集成仍然是未来的关键目标。
{"title":"SSTR PET/CT for skull base low-grade meningioma: a critical tool for accurate gross tumor volume delineation in radiotherapy?","authors":"Frederik Fuchs, Sebastian N Marschner, Jan Hofmaier, Maya Rottler, Indra Hadi, Sebastian H Maier, Tobias Greve, Adrien Holzgreve, Nathalie L Albert, Raphael Bodensohn, Claus Belka, Maximilian Niyazi, Franziska Walter","doi":"10.1186/s13014-025-02718-4","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s13014-025-02718-4","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Precise delineation of gross tumor volume (GTV) is fundamental for effective radiation therapy in low-grade skull base meningiomas. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) serves as the primary imaging tool but may not fully represent tumor extent. This study investigates the additional value of incorporating Somatostatin receptor (SSTR)-directed PET/CT in radiation therapy planning.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted with four experienced radiation oncologists contouring GTVs for skull base meningiomas using MRI alone (GTV_MRI), PET/CT alone (GTV_PET/CT), and both modalities combined (GTV_ALL). Consensus ground truth volumes were generated for each modality through a STAPLE algorithm. Agreement between modalities, excluding observer variability, was assessed using statistical metrics including Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC), Jaccard Index (JCI), Hausdorff distance (HD95), Geographical Miss Index (GMI), sensitivity, and kappa statistics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 25 patients (15 females, 10 males; median age 56 years (range: 23-74 years), with 96% achieving local control post-radiotherapy over a median follow-up of 64 months (range: 28-135 months). Substantial interobserver agreement was observed, with median kappa values of 0.74 for GTV_MRI, 0.68 for GTV_PET/CT, and 0.77 for GTV_ALL. Median consensus volumes were 6.65 cc (MRI<sub>STAPLE</sub>), 7.21 cc (PET<sub>STAPLE</sub>), and 6.73 cc (ALL<sub>STAPLE</sub>). The median GMI for MRI<sub>STAPLE</sub> compared to ALL<sub>STAPLE</sub> was 0.18 (IQR: 0.11-0.39), and 0.21 (IQR: 0.15-0.28) for PET<sub>STAPLE</sub> compared to ALL<sub>STAPLE</sub>. The DSC indicated the lowest concordance between MRI<sub>STAPLE</sub> and PET<sub>STAPLE</sub> with a median of 0.75 (IQR: 0.59-0.82), followed by PET<sub>STAPLE</sub> versus ALL<sub>STAPLE</sub> with a median DSC of 0.84 (IQR: 0.79-0.89), and MRI<sub>STAPLE</sub> versus ALL<sub>STAPLE</sub> with a median DSC of 0.89 (IQR: 0.76-0.92). The integration of PET/CT with MRI significantly enhanced concordance metrics.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Combining MRI and PET/CT improves GTV delineation in low-grade skull base meningiomas, as PET/CT can reveal regions missed by MRI, which may slightly underestimate tumor size. This multimodal imaging approach enhances consensus and supports its role in radiotherapy planning. Standardized protocols and technical integration remain key future goals.</p>","PeriodicalId":49639,"journal":{"name":"Radiation Oncology","volume":"20 1","pages":"142"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2025-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12455788/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145126216","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Correction: Research trends and hot spots in the prevention and management of radiation dermatitis: a bibliometric analysis based on CiteSpace. 更正:放射性皮炎防治的研究趋势与热点:基于CiteSpace的文献计量学分析。
IF 3.3 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-09-18 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-025-02728-2
Lu Zhang, Lian Liu, Fang Li, Peijuan Chen, Feng Ye
{"title":"Correction: Research trends and hot spots in the prevention and management of radiation dermatitis: a bibliometric analysis based on CiteSpace.","authors":"Lu Zhang, Lian Liu, Fang Li, Peijuan Chen, Feng Ye","doi":"10.1186/s13014-025-02728-2","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s13014-025-02728-2","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":49639,"journal":{"name":"Radiation Oncology","volume":"20 1","pages":"141"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2025-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12445019/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145087896","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
CHAT-RT study: ChatGPT in radiation oncology-a survey on usage, perception, and impact among DEGRO members. CHAT-RT研究:放射肿瘤学中的ChatGPT -对DEGRO成员的使用、认知和影响的调查。
IF 3.3 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-09-15 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-025-02721-9
Dinah Konnerth, Alev Altay-Langguth, Diana-Coralia Dehelean, Sebastian H Maier, Montserrat Pazos, Paul Rogowski, Stephan Schönecker, Chukwuka Eze, Stefanie Corradini, Claus Belka, Sebastian N Marschner

Background: Radiation oncology is increasingly turning to Artificial Intelligence (AI) - and in particular Chat Generative pre-trained transformer (ChatGPT) - for decision support, patient education, and workflow efficiency. Despite promising gains, questions about accuracy, General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR)-compliance and ethical use persist, especially in high-stakes cancer care. To clarify real-world attitudes and practices, we surveyed members of the German Society of Radiation Oncology (DEGRO) on their use, perceptions, and concerns regarding ChatGPT across clinical, research, communication, and administrative tasks.

Methods: An anonymous online survey was implemented via LimeSurvey platform and distributed to all members of the DEGRO in Germany, Austria, and Switzerland between April and June 2024. The 40-item questionnaire-covering demographics, radiotherapy experience, and ChatGPT's clinical, research, communication, and administrative applications-was developed through a narrative literature review, ChatGPT-assisted drafting, back-translation, expert validation, and pilot testing. Fully completed responses were used for descriptive statistics and analysis.

Results: Of 213 respondents, 159 fully completed the survey. Participants were predominantly based in Germany (92.5%), worked in university hospitals (74.2%), and identified as radiation oncologists (54.7%), with a broad range of radiotherapy experience (< 1 year: 7.5%; >15 years: 24.5%). Awareness of ChatGPT was high (94.9%), yet actual use varied: 32.1% never used it, while 35.2% employed it regularly for administrative tasks and 30.2% for manuscript drafting. Mid-career clinicians (6-10 years' experience) showed the greatest enthusiasm-44% agreed it saves time and 72% planned further integration-though all career stages (71.7% overall) expressed strong interest in formal training. Satisfaction was highest for administrative (94.6%) and manuscript support (91.7%) but lower for technical queries (66.7%). Major concerns included misinformation (69.2%), erosion of critical thinking (57.9%), and data-privacy risks (57.2%).

Conclusion: Our survey demonstrates high awareness and adoption of ChatGPT for administrative and educational tasks, alongside more cautious use in clinical decision-making. Widespread concerns about misinformation, critical-thinking erosion, and data privacy-especially among early- and mid-career clinicians-underscore the need for targeted AI training, rigorous validation, and transparent governance to ensure safe, effective integration into patient care.

背景:放射肿瘤学越来越多地转向人工智能(AI) -特别是聊天生成预训练转换器(ChatGPT) -用于决策支持,患者教育和工作流程效率。尽管取得了可喜的进展,但关于准确性、通用数据保护条例(GDPR)合规性和道德使用的问题仍然存在,特别是在高风险的癌症治疗中。为了澄清现实世界的态度和实践,我们调查了德国放射肿瘤学会(DEGRO)的成员,了解他们在临床、研究、沟通和管理任务中对ChatGPT的使用、看法和关注。方法:通过limessurvey平台进行匿名在线调查,并于2024年4 - 6月在德国、奥地利和瑞士的DEGRO所有成员中进行分发。问卷共有40个条目,包括人口统计、放疗经验、ChatGPT的临床、研究、交流和管理应用。问卷通过文献综述、ChatGPT辅助起草、反翻译、专家验证和试点测试等方法编制而成。完整填写的问卷用于描述性统计和分析。结果:213名受访者中,159人完全完成了调查。参与者主要来自德国(92.5%),在大学医院工作(74.2%),并确定为放射肿瘤学家(54.7%),具有广泛的放射治疗经验(15年:24.5%)。对ChatGPT的知晓率很高(94.9%),但实际使用情况各不相同:32.1%的人从未使用过它,35.2%的人定期使用它进行管理任务,30.2%的人使用它起草手稿。职业生涯中期的临床医生(6-10年经验)表现出最大的热情——44%的人认为这节省了时间,72%的人计划进一步整合——尽管所有职业阶段(总体71.7%)都对正式培训表现出强烈的兴趣。满意度最高的是行政管理(94.6%)和稿件支持(91.7%),而较低的是技术查询(66.7%)。主要的担忧包括错误信息(69.2%)、批判性思维的侵蚀(57.9%)和数据隐私风险(57.2%)。结论:我们的调查显示,ChatGPT在行政和教育任务中的认知度和采用度较高,同时在临床决策中使用更为谨慎。对错误信息、批判性思维侵蚀和数据隐私的普遍担忧——尤其是在职业生涯早期和中期的临床医生中——强调了有针对性的人工智能培训、严格的验证和透明的治理的必要性,以确保安全、有效地融入患者护理。
{"title":"CHAT-RT study: ChatGPT in radiation oncology-a survey on usage, perception, and impact among DEGRO members.","authors":"Dinah Konnerth, Alev Altay-Langguth, Diana-Coralia Dehelean, Sebastian H Maier, Montserrat Pazos, Paul Rogowski, Stephan Schönecker, Chukwuka Eze, Stefanie Corradini, Claus Belka, Sebastian N Marschner","doi":"10.1186/s13014-025-02721-9","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s13014-025-02721-9","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Radiation oncology is increasingly turning to Artificial Intelligence (AI) - and in particular Chat Generative pre-trained transformer (ChatGPT) - for decision support, patient education, and workflow efficiency. Despite promising gains, questions about accuracy, General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR)-compliance and ethical use persist, especially in high-stakes cancer care. To clarify real-world attitudes and practices, we surveyed members of the German Society of Radiation Oncology (DEGRO) on their use, perceptions, and concerns regarding ChatGPT across clinical, research, communication, and administrative tasks.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An anonymous online survey was implemented via LimeSurvey platform and distributed to all members of the DEGRO in Germany, Austria, and Switzerland between April and June 2024. The 40-item questionnaire-covering demographics, radiotherapy experience, and ChatGPT's clinical, research, communication, and administrative applications-was developed through a narrative literature review, ChatGPT-assisted drafting, back-translation, expert validation, and pilot testing. Fully completed responses were used for descriptive statistics and analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 213 respondents, 159 fully completed the survey. Participants were predominantly based in Germany (92.5%), worked in university hospitals (74.2%), and identified as radiation oncologists (54.7%), with a broad range of radiotherapy experience (< 1 year: 7.5%; >15 years: 24.5%). Awareness of ChatGPT was high (94.9%), yet actual use varied: 32.1% never used it, while 35.2% employed it regularly for administrative tasks and 30.2% for manuscript drafting. Mid-career clinicians (6-10 years' experience) showed the greatest enthusiasm-44% agreed it saves time and 72% planned further integration-though all career stages (71.7% overall) expressed strong interest in formal training. Satisfaction was highest for administrative (94.6%) and manuscript support (91.7%) but lower for technical queries (66.7%). Major concerns included misinformation (69.2%), erosion of critical thinking (57.9%), and data-privacy risks (57.2%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our survey demonstrates high awareness and adoption of ChatGPT for administrative and educational tasks, alongside more cautious use in clinical decision-making. Widespread concerns about misinformation, critical-thinking erosion, and data privacy-especially among early- and mid-career clinicians-underscore the need for targeted AI training, rigorous validation, and transparent governance to ensure safe, effective integration into patient care.</p>","PeriodicalId":49639,"journal":{"name":"Radiation Oncology","volume":"20 1","pages":"140"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2025-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12439408/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145070936","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Improved local control using higher dose SBRT in metastatic sarcoma patients. 使用高剂量SBRT改善转移性肉瘤患者的局部控制。
IF 3.3 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-09-08 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-025-02719-3
Mattias Hedman, Elia Rossi, Emmy Dalqvist, Kristin Karlsson, Christina Linder-Stragliotto

Background: Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) has been proven to be a safe and effective alternative to surgery in patients with metastatic primary sarcoma. However, data describing tumor response in relation to the given radiotherapy dose is lacking. Therefore, this study aims at analyzing efficacy and dose-response relationship in a retrospective cohort.

Methods: Patients with metastatic sarcoma treated with ablative SBRT and followed up at the Karolinska University Hospital between 2008 and 2021 were included. SBRT was delivered using an inhomogeneous dose distribution resulting in higher median doses within the planning target volume (PTV) than the dose prescribed. Local control (LC), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), adverse events and dose-response relationship were assessed. Statistical analysis was performed to identify variables that correlate to outcome.

Results: Forty-three patients with a total of 83 lesions were treated. The most frequent histology was leiomyosarcoma (44%). The most common site of metastases was the lung (84%), followed by the liver (11%). The median prescription dose was 45 Gy (range 30-56 Gy) delivered in 3 fractions (range 2-8) with a planned median CTV mean dose of 309 Gy in EQD2 with α/β = 3 Gy. The local control at 1-year, 2-year and 5-year from SBRT treatment was 97, 93 and 84%, respectively. For tumors with a planned mean CTV dose above EQD2 278.8 Gy (corresponding to 60.3 Gy in 3 fractions) the 1, 2 and 5-year local control was 100, 100 and 93%, respectively. Tumors planned with a lower dose than EQD2 278.8 Gy (α/β = 3 Gy) had a 1, 2 and 5-year local control of 90, 70 and 52%, respectively. The difference in local control between the high dose and low dose groups was statistically significant (p < 0.001). The median OS for all patients was 43 months. When respecting dose constraints, there were only limited number of mild side effects.

Conclusion: In this analysis a strongly significant dose-response relationship with excellent LC rates and limited side effects for patients with metastatic lesions of sarcoma were seen. These results could be related to the inhomogeneous dose distribution of SBRT treatments utilized in this study.

背景:立体定向放射治疗(SBRT)已被证明是转移性原发性肉瘤患者手术治疗的安全有效的替代方法。然而,描述肿瘤反应与给定放疗剂量相关的数据是缺乏的。因此,本研究旨在通过回顾性队列分析疗效和剂量-反应关系。方法:纳入2008年至2021年间在卡罗林斯卡大学医院接受消融性SBRT治疗并随访的转移性肉瘤患者。SBRT的剂量分布不均匀,导致计划靶体积(PTV)内的中位剂量高于规定剂量。评估局部控制(LC)、无进展生存(PFS)、总生存(OS)、不良事件和剂量-反应关系。进行统计分析以确定与结果相关的变量。结果:治疗43例患者,共83个病灶。最常见的组织学为平滑肌肉瘤(44%)。最常见的转移部位是肺(84%),其次是肝脏(11%)。处方中位剂量为45 Gy(范围30-56 Gy),分3次(范围2-8)给药,EQD2计划中位CTV平均剂量为309 Gy, α/β = 3 Gy。SBRT治疗1年、2年和5年的局部控制率分别为97%、93%和84%。对于计划平均CTV剂量高于EQD2 278.8 Gy(对应于3组60.3 Gy)的肿瘤,1年、2年和5年局部控制率分别为100%、100%和93%。计划剂量低于EQD2 278.8 Gy (α/β = 3 Gy)的肿瘤,1、2和5年局部控制率分别为90%、70%和52%。高剂量组和低剂量组局部对照的差异有统计学意义(p)。结论:在本分析中,我们发现转移性肉瘤患者具有极好的LC率和有限的副作用。这些结果可能与本研究中使用的SBRT治疗的剂量分布不均匀有关。
{"title":"Improved local control using higher dose SBRT in metastatic sarcoma patients.","authors":"Mattias Hedman, Elia Rossi, Emmy Dalqvist, Kristin Karlsson, Christina Linder-Stragliotto","doi":"10.1186/s13014-025-02719-3","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s13014-025-02719-3","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) has been proven to be a safe and effective alternative to surgery in patients with metastatic primary sarcoma. However, data describing tumor response in relation to the given radiotherapy dose is lacking. Therefore, this study aims at analyzing efficacy and dose-response relationship in a retrospective cohort.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with metastatic sarcoma treated with ablative SBRT and followed up at the Karolinska University Hospital between 2008 and 2021 were included. SBRT was delivered using an inhomogeneous dose distribution resulting in higher median doses within the planning target volume (PTV) than the dose prescribed. Local control (LC), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), adverse events and dose-response relationship were assessed. Statistical analysis was performed to identify variables that correlate to outcome.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-three patients with a total of 83 lesions were treated. The most frequent histology was leiomyosarcoma (44%). The most common site of metastases was the lung (84%), followed by the liver (11%). The median prescription dose was 45 Gy (range 30-56 Gy) delivered in 3 fractions (range 2-8) with a planned median CTV mean dose of 309 Gy in EQD<sub>2</sub> with α/β = 3 Gy. The local control at 1-year, 2-year and 5-year from SBRT treatment was 97, 93 and 84%, respectively. For tumors with a planned mean CTV dose above EQD<sub>2</sub> 278.8 Gy (corresponding to 60.3 Gy in 3 fractions) the 1, 2 and 5-year local control was 100, 100 and 93%, respectively. Tumors planned with a lower dose than EQD<sub>2</sub> 278.8 Gy (α/β = 3 Gy) had a 1, 2 and 5-year local control of 90, 70 and 52%, respectively. The difference in local control between the high dose and low dose groups was statistically significant (p < 0.001). The median OS for all patients was 43 months. When respecting dose constraints, there were only limited number of mild side effects.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this analysis a strongly significant dose-response relationship with excellent LC rates and limited side effects for patients with metastatic lesions of sarcoma were seen. These results could be related to the inhomogeneous dose distribution of SBRT treatments utilized in this study.</p>","PeriodicalId":49639,"journal":{"name":"Radiation Oncology","volume":"20 1","pages":"139"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2025-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12418616/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145024687","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Comparative metabolomic analysis of human lung slices (hu-PCLS) exposed to either standard or FLASH protons: a pilot study. 暴露于标准或FLASH质子的人肺切片(hu-PCLS)的比较代谢组学分析:一项试点研究。
IF 3.3 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-09-02 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-025-02714-8
Anastasia Velalopoulou, Tytus D Mak, Annabella Deziel, Michele M Kim, Constantinos Koumenis, Melpo Christofidou-Solomidou, Evagelia C Laiakis
{"title":"Comparative metabolomic analysis of human lung slices (hu-PCLS) exposed to either standard or FLASH protons: a pilot study.","authors":"Anastasia Velalopoulou, Tytus D Mak, Annabella Deziel, Michele M Kim, Constantinos Koumenis, Melpo Christofidou-Solomidou, Evagelia C Laiakis","doi":"10.1186/s13014-025-02714-8","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s13014-025-02714-8","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":49639,"journal":{"name":"Radiation Oncology","volume":"20 1","pages":"138"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2025-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12403441/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144976250","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Surrogating tumour cell density in head and neck cancer: [18F]FDG PET- versus ADC (MRI)-based approaches. 头颈癌的替代肿瘤细胞密度:[18]FDG PET与ADC (MRI)为基础的方法。
IF 3.3 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-09-01 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-025-02716-6
Athanasios Kafkaletos, Ilias Sachpazidis, Michael Mix, Montserrat Carles, Raluca Stoian, Henning Schäfer, Michael Bock, Dimos Baltas, Anca L Grosu

Objective: In this study we examined the correlation between standardized uptake value (SUV) of [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) within the gross tumor volume (GTV) of patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). In addition, we assessed the comparability of cell density (ρ) estimates obtained from FDG PET and MRI data.

Methods: Twenty-one HNSCC patients from a prospective FMISO imaging trial underwent pre-treatment PET/CT and MRI. We assessed correlations between FDG SUV (mean, max) and ADC (mean, min) within the GTV using Pearson's correlation coefficient. The tumor cell density within the GTV was calculated from FDG SUV and from ADC maps. For the estimation of ADC-based cell density, we used a published tumor cell volume fraction (vTC). Agreement between FDG- and ADC-derived cell density estimates was assessed. The best-fitting vTC* was computed to achieve equal mean ρADC and ρFDG for each patient and was compared to the literature.

Results: The SUV and ADC metrics showed up to moderate negative correlations, but none of them were statistically significant at p < 0.05. The correlation of SUVmean vs. ADCmean with Pearson's correlation coefficient r = -0.426 and p = 0.054 and SUVmax vs. ADCmin with r = -0.414 and p = 0.062 suggested a weak negative trend. The average and standard deviation of mean ρFDG and ρADC across our cohort were (1.8 ± 0.6) × 108 cells/ml and (3.3 ± 0.2) × 108 cells/ml. The difference between the mean ρFDG and ρADC was statistically significant (p < 0.001). To achieve equal mean ρADC and ρFDG for each patient, the mean optimal vTC* with standard deviation was 0.29 ± 0.09. Although significantly lower than the published mean vTC​ (0.54), vTC* lies within the published range of vTC for HNSCCs (0.28 to 0.75).

Conclusion: ADC and SUV metrics exhibited moderate but marginally insignificant correlation in this dataset. Although not directly interchangeable, the two methods provide comparable, clinically relevant cell density estimates, offering flexibility to use the most accessible modality for individualized treatment planning.

Trial registration: Registered at German Clinical Trials Register on 20/08/2015 (DRKS00003830).

目的:本研究探讨了[18F]氟脱氧葡萄糖(FDG)的标准化摄取值(SUV)与头颈部鳞状细胞癌(HNSCC)患者总肿瘤体积(GTV)内表观扩散系数(ADC)的相关性。此外,我们评估了从FDG PET和MRI数据获得的细胞密度(ρ)估计值的可比性。方法:来自前瞻性FMISO成像试验的21例HNSCC患者接受了预处理PET/CT和MRI。我们使用Pearson相关系数评估GTV内FDG SUV(平均值,最大值)与ADC(平均值,最小值)之间的相关性。GTV内的肿瘤细胞密度由FDG SUV和ADC图计算。为了估计基于adc的细胞密度,我们使用了已发表的肿瘤细胞体积分数(vTC)。评估了FDG和adc衍生的细胞密度估计值的一致性。计算最佳拟合vTC*,使每位患者的平均ρADC和ρFDG相等,并与文献进行比较。结果:SUV与ADC指标呈中度负相关,但p mean与ADCmean的Pearson相关系数r = -0.426和p = 0.054均无统计学意义;SUVmax与ADCmin的Pearson相关系数r = -0.414和p = 0.062均呈弱负相关。在整个队列中,平均ρFDG和ρADC的平均值和标准差分别为(1.8±0.6)× 108 cells/ml和(3.3±0.2)× 108 cells/ml。每个患者的平均ρFDG与ρFDG的差异有统计学意义(p ADC与ρFDG),平均最优vTC*标准差为0.29±0.09。虽然远低于公布的平均职涯值(0.54),但职涯值*仍在公布的高级别公务员职涯值范围内(0.28至0.75)。结论:ADC和SUV指标在该数据集中表现出中度但不显著的相关性。虽然不能直接互换,但这两种方法提供了可比较的、临床相关的细胞密度估计,为个性化治疗计划提供了使用最容易获得的方式的灵活性。试验注册:2015年8月20日在德国临床试验注册中心注册(DRKS00003830)。
{"title":"Surrogating tumour cell density in head and neck cancer: [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG PET- versus ADC (MRI)-based approaches.","authors":"Athanasios Kafkaletos, Ilias Sachpazidis, Michael Mix, Montserrat Carles, Raluca Stoian, Henning Schäfer, Michael Bock, Dimos Baltas, Anca L Grosu","doi":"10.1186/s13014-025-02716-6","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s13014-025-02716-6","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>In this study we examined the correlation between standardized uptake value (SUV) of [<sup>18</sup>F]fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) within the gross tumor volume (GTV) of patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). In addition, we assessed the comparability of cell density (ρ) estimates obtained from FDG PET and MRI data.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-one HNSCC patients from a prospective FMISO imaging trial underwent pre-treatment PET/CT and MRI. We assessed correlations between FDG SUV (mean, max) and ADC (mean, min) within the GTV using Pearson's correlation coefficient. The tumor cell density within the GTV was calculated from FDG SUV and from ADC maps. For the estimation of ADC-based cell density, we used a published tumor cell volume fraction (v<sub>TC</sub>). Agreement between FDG- and ADC-derived cell density estimates was assessed. The best-fitting v<sub>TC</sub>* was computed to achieve equal mean ρ<sub>ADC</sub> and ρ<sub>FDG</sub> for each patient and was compared to the literature.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The SUV and ADC metrics showed up to moderate negative correlations, but none of them were statistically significant at p < 0.05. The correlation of SUV<sub>mean</sub> vs. ADC<sub>mean</sub> with Pearson's correlation coefficient r = -0.426 and p = 0.054 and SUV<sub>max</sub> vs. ADC<sub>min</sub> with r = -0.414 and p = 0.062 suggested a weak negative trend. The average and standard deviation of mean ρ<sub>FDG</sub> and ρ<sub>ADC</sub> across our cohort were (1.8 ± 0.6) × 10<sup>8</sup> cells/ml and (3.3 ± 0.2) × 10<sup>8</sup> cells/ml. The difference between the mean ρ<sub>FDG</sub> and ρ<sub>ADC</sub> was statistically significant (p < 0.001). To achieve equal mean ρ<sub>ADC</sub> and ρ<sub>FDG</sub> for each patient, the mean optimal v<sub>TC</sub>* with standard deviation was 0.29 ± 0.09. Although significantly lower than the published mean v<sub>TC</sub>​ (0.54), v<sub>TC</sub>* lies within the published range of v<sub>TC</sub> for HNSCCs (0.28 to 0.75).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ADC and SUV metrics exhibited moderate but marginally insignificant correlation in this dataset. Although not directly interchangeable, the two methods provide comparable, clinically relevant cell density estimates, offering flexibility to use the most accessible modality for individualized treatment planning.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Registered at German Clinical Trials Register on 20/08/2015 (DRKS00003830).</p>","PeriodicalId":49639,"journal":{"name":"Radiation Oncology","volume":"20 1","pages":"137"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12403412/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144976272","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Radiation Oncology
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1