Pub Date : 2024-11-21DOI: 10.1186/s13014-024-02554-y
Céline Meyer, Sandrine Huger, Marie Bruand, Thomas Leroy, Jérémy Palisson, Paul Rétif, Thomas Sarrade, Anais Barateau, Sophie Renard, Maria Jolnerovski, Nicolas Demogeot, Johann Marcel, Nicolas Martz, Anaïs Stefani, Selima Sellami, Juliette Jacques, Emma Agnoux, William Gehin, Ida Trampetti, Agathe Margulies, Constance Golfier, Yassir Khattabi, Olivier Cravéreau, Alizée Renan, Jean-François Py, Jean-Christophe Faivre
Introduction: The delineation of organs-at-risk and lymph node areas is a crucial step in radiotherapy, but it is time-consuming and associated with substantial user-dependent variability in contouring. Artificial intelligence (AI) appears to be the solution to facilitate and standardize this work. The objective of this study is to compare eight available AI software programs in terms of technical aspects and accuracy for contouring organs-at-risk and lymph node areas with current international contouring recommendations.
Material and methods: From January-July 2023, we performed a blinded study of the contour scoring of the organs-at-risk and lymph node areas by eight self-contouring AI programs by 20 radiation oncologists. It was a single-center study conducted in radiation department at the Lorraine Cancer Institute. A qualitative analysis of technical characteristics of the different AI programs was also performed. Three adults (two women and one man) and three children (one girl and two boys) provided six whole-body anonymized CT scans, along with two other adult brain MRI scans. Using a scoring scale from 1 to 3 (best score), radiation oncologists blindly assessed the quality of contouring of organs-at-risk and lymph node areas of all scans and MRI data by the eight AI programs. We have chosen to define the threshold of an average score equal to or greater than 2 to characterize a high-performing AI software, meaning an AI with minimal to moderate corrections but usable in clinical routine.
Results: For adults CT scans: There were two AI programs for which the overall average quality score (that is, all areas tested for OARs and lymph nodes) was higher than 2.0: Limbus (overall average score = 2.03 (0.16)) and MVision (overall average score = 2.13 (0.19)). If we only consider OARs for adults, only Limbus, Therapanacea, MVision and Radformation have an average score above 2. For children CT scan, MVision was the only program to have a average score higher than 2 with overall average score = 2.07 (0.19). If we only consider OARs for children, only Limbus and MVision have an average score above 2. For brain MRIs: TheraPanacea was the only program with an average score over 2, for both brain delineation (2.75 (0.35)) and OARs (2.09 (0.19)). The comparative analysis of the technical aspects highlights the similarities and differences between the software. There is no difference in between senior radiation oncologist and residents for OARs contouring.
Conclusion: For adult CT-scan, two AI programs on the market, MVision and Limbus, delineate most OARs and lymph nodes areas that are useful in clinical routine. For children CT-scan, only one IA, MVision, program is efficient. For adult brain MRI, Therapancea,only one AI program is efficient.
{"title":"Artificial intelligence contouring in radiotherapy for organs-at-risk and lymph node areas.","authors":"Céline Meyer, Sandrine Huger, Marie Bruand, Thomas Leroy, Jérémy Palisson, Paul Rétif, Thomas Sarrade, Anais Barateau, Sophie Renard, Maria Jolnerovski, Nicolas Demogeot, Johann Marcel, Nicolas Martz, Anaïs Stefani, Selima Sellami, Juliette Jacques, Emma Agnoux, William Gehin, Ida Trampetti, Agathe Margulies, Constance Golfier, Yassir Khattabi, Olivier Cravéreau, Alizée Renan, Jean-François Py, Jean-Christophe Faivre","doi":"10.1186/s13014-024-02554-y","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s13014-024-02554-y","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The delineation of organs-at-risk and lymph node areas is a crucial step in radiotherapy, but it is time-consuming and associated with substantial user-dependent variability in contouring. Artificial intelligence (AI) appears to be the solution to facilitate and standardize this work. The objective of this study is to compare eight available AI software programs in terms of technical aspects and accuracy for contouring organs-at-risk and lymph node areas with current international contouring recommendations.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>From January-July 2023, we performed a blinded study of the contour scoring of the organs-at-risk and lymph node areas by eight self-contouring AI programs by 20 radiation oncologists. It was a single-center study conducted in radiation department at the Lorraine Cancer Institute. A qualitative analysis of technical characteristics of the different AI programs was also performed. Three adults (two women and one man) and three children (one girl and two boys) provided six whole-body anonymized CT scans, along with two other adult brain MRI scans. Using a scoring scale from 1 to 3 (best score), radiation oncologists blindly assessed the quality of contouring of organs-at-risk and lymph node areas of all scans and MRI data by the eight AI programs. We have chosen to define the threshold of an average score equal to or greater than 2 to characterize a high-performing AI software, meaning an AI with minimal to moderate corrections but usable in clinical routine.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For adults CT scans: There were two AI programs for which the overall average quality score (that is, all areas tested for OARs and lymph nodes) was higher than 2.0: Limbus (overall average score = 2.03 (0.16)) and MVision (overall average score = 2.13 (0.19)). If we only consider OARs for adults, only Limbus, Therapanacea, MVision and Radformation have an average score above 2. For children CT scan, MVision was the only program to have a average score higher than 2 with overall average score = 2.07 (0.19). If we only consider OARs for children, only Limbus and MVision have an average score above 2. For brain MRIs: TheraPanacea was the only program with an average score over 2, for both brain delineation (2.75 (0.35)) and OARs (2.09 (0.19)). The comparative analysis of the technical aspects highlights the similarities and differences between the software. There is no difference in between senior radiation oncologist and residents for OARs contouring.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>For adult CT-scan, two AI programs on the market, MVision and Limbus, delineate most OARs and lymph nodes areas that are useful in clinical routine. For children CT-scan, only one IA, MVision, program is efficient. For adult brain MRI, Therapancea,only one AI program is efficient.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>CNIL-MR0004 Number HDH434.</p>","PeriodicalId":49639,"journal":{"name":"Radiation Oncology","volume":"19 1","pages":"168"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2024-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11580215/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142689500","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-21DOI: 10.1186/s13014-024-02544-0
Kristina K M Kramer, Nina-Sophie Schmidt-Hegemann, Thilo Westhofen, Marco Foglar, Jens Ricke, C Benedikt Westphalen, Marcus Unterrainer, Wolfgang G Kunz, Dirk Mehrens
Background: Metastatic prostate cancer remains a therapeutic challenge. Based on data of the STAMPEDE trial, patients with a low metastatic burden showed prolonged failure-free and overall survival when treated with prostate radio therapy (RT) in addition to standard of care (SOC). The objective of this study was to determine the cost-effectiveness of additional prostate RT compared to SOC alone for following subgroups: non-regional lymph node (NRLN) metastases, up to three bone metastases and four or more bone metastases.
Methods: A partitioned survival model was implemented with clinical data from STAMPEDE trial. Analyses were performed from a United States healthcare system perspective. Costs for treatment and adverse events were derived from Medicare coverage. Utilities for health states were derived from public databases and literature. Outcome measurements included incremental costs, effectiveness, and cost-effectiveness ratio. The willingness-to-pay threshold was set to USD 100,000 per quality-adjusted life year (QALY).
Results: Additional RT led to 0.92 incremental QALYs with increased costs of USD 26,098 with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of USD 28,452/QALY for patients with only NRLN metastases and 3.83 incremental QALYs with increased costs of USD 153,490 with an ICER of USD 40,032/QALY for patients with up to three bone metastases. Sensitivity analysis showed robustness of the model regarding various parameters. In probabilistic sensitivity analysis using Monte Carlo simulation with 10,000 iterations, additional RT was found as the cost-effective strategy in over 96% for both subgroups iterations at a willingness-to-pay threshold of USD 100,000/QALYs.
Conclusions: Additional RT is cost-effective in patients with only NRLN metastases and up to three metastases compared to SOC.
{"title":"Cost-effectiveness analysis of additional local prostate radio therapy in metastatic prostate cancer from a medicare perspective.","authors":"Kristina K M Kramer, Nina-Sophie Schmidt-Hegemann, Thilo Westhofen, Marco Foglar, Jens Ricke, C Benedikt Westphalen, Marcus Unterrainer, Wolfgang G Kunz, Dirk Mehrens","doi":"10.1186/s13014-024-02544-0","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s13014-024-02544-0","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Metastatic prostate cancer remains a therapeutic challenge. Based on data of the STAMPEDE trial, patients with a low metastatic burden showed prolonged failure-free and overall survival when treated with prostate radio therapy (RT) in addition to standard of care (SOC). The objective of this study was to determine the cost-effectiveness of additional prostate RT compared to SOC alone for following subgroups: non-regional lymph node (NRLN) metastases, up to three bone metastases and four or more bone metastases.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A partitioned survival model was implemented with clinical data from STAMPEDE trial. Analyses were performed from a United States healthcare system perspective. Costs for treatment and adverse events were derived from Medicare coverage. Utilities for health states were derived from public databases and literature. Outcome measurements included incremental costs, effectiveness, and cost-effectiveness ratio. The willingness-to-pay threshold was set to USD 100,000 per quality-adjusted life year (QALY).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Additional RT led to 0.92 incremental QALYs with increased costs of USD 26,098 with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of USD 28,452/QALY for patients with only NRLN metastases and 3.83 incremental QALYs with increased costs of USD 153,490 with an ICER of USD 40,032/QALY for patients with up to three bone metastases. Sensitivity analysis showed robustness of the model regarding various parameters. In probabilistic sensitivity analysis using Monte Carlo simulation with 10,000 iterations, additional RT was found as the cost-effective strategy in over 96% for both subgroups iterations at a willingness-to-pay threshold of USD 100,000/QALYs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Additional RT is cost-effective in patients with only NRLN metastases and up to three metastases compared to SOC.</p>","PeriodicalId":49639,"journal":{"name":"Radiation Oncology","volume":"19 1","pages":"167"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2024-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11580356/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142689503","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-20DOI: 10.1186/s13014-024-02548-w
Karin M Meijer, Irma W E M van Dijk, Tamara J Schonk, Brian V Balgobind, Anna Loginova, Niek van Wieringen, Arjan Bel
Background: During the day-night cycle, gravity and applied stress to the body mass and spine causes a decrease in body height, which is restored overnight. This diurnal spine length variation has not yet been quantified during radiotherapy. Therefore, we aimed to quantify diurnal spine length variation on cone beam CTs (CBCTs) of pediatric patients (< 18 years) who underwent radiotherapy.
Methods: For this retrospective study, we included 32 patients (mean age 10.0, range 2.7-16.1 years) who received image guided radiotherapy between 2012 and 2018 in two institutes. Patients were included when they had two fractions per day, or when fractions were scheduled on varying time slots over the course of treatment. Daily CBCTs were registered to the planning CTs using two automatic registrations relative to the bony anatomy; one to vertebra T11 and one to vertebra L4. For each CBCT, the differences between the cranial-caudal (CC) position of the T11 and L4 vertebrae were calculated. To determine the diurnal spine length variation, the difference in vertebrae position between the morning and afternoon CBCTs was calculated. Furthermore, we investigated the possible correlation of diurnal spine length variation with the time slot differences (time interval) between CBCTs (Spearman's ρ).
Results: Overall, the median spine length variation was -1.0 (range -3.9-0.1) mm, and we found a significant reduction in spine length over the day (p < 0.001) with substantial variations between patients. Time intervals between CBCTs ranging from 4.0 to 9.5 h were not correlated with spine length reduction (ρ=-0.01; p = 0.95).
Conclusions: We found a small but significant reduction in spine length (vertebrae T11 to L4) over the course of day in pediatric patients undergoing radiotherapy, measured on CBCT imaging. Spine length reduction did not correlate with CBCT time intervals. However, our results indicate that diurnal spine length reduction could induce a setup error during treatment, and therefore should be considered in pediatric radiotherapy.
{"title":"Timing matters: diurnal spine length variation in pediatric patients during radiotherapy.","authors":"Karin M Meijer, Irma W E M van Dijk, Tamara J Schonk, Brian V Balgobind, Anna Loginova, Niek van Wieringen, Arjan Bel","doi":"10.1186/s13014-024-02548-w","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s13014-024-02548-w","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>During the day-night cycle, gravity and applied stress to the body mass and spine causes a decrease in body height, which is restored overnight. This diurnal spine length variation has not yet been quantified during radiotherapy. Therefore, we aimed to quantify diurnal spine length variation on cone beam CTs (CBCTs) of pediatric patients (< 18 years) who underwent radiotherapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>For this retrospective study, we included 32 patients (mean age 10.0, range 2.7-16.1 years) who received image guided radiotherapy between 2012 and 2018 in two institutes. Patients were included when they had two fractions per day, or when fractions were scheduled on varying time slots over the course of treatment. Daily CBCTs were registered to the planning CTs using two automatic registrations relative to the bony anatomy; one to vertebra T11 and one to vertebra L4. For each CBCT, the differences between the cranial-caudal (CC) position of the T11 and L4 vertebrae were calculated. To determine the diurnal spine length variation, the difference in vertebrae position between the morning and afternoon CBCTs was calculated. Furthermore, we investigated the possible correlation of diurnal spine length variation with the time slot differences (time interval) between CBCTs (Spearman's ρ).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, the median spine length variation was -1.0 (range -3.9-0.1) mm, and we found a significant reduction in spine length over the day (p < 0.001) with substantial variations between patients. Time intervals between CBCTs ranging from 4.0 to 9.5 h were not correlated with spine length reduction (ρ=-0.01; p = 0.95).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We found a small but significant reduction in spine length (vertebrae T11 to L4) over the course of day in pediatric patients undergoing radiotherapy, measured on CBCT imaging. Spine length reduction did not correlate with CBCT time intervals. However, our results indicate that diurnal spine length reduction could induce a setup error during treatment, and therefore should be considered in pediatric radiotherapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":49639,"journal":{"name":"Radiation Oncology","volume":"19 1","pages":"166"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2024-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11580553/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142683289","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-19DOI: 10.1186/s13014-024-02507-5
Milad Ghanikolahloo, Hayder Jasim Taher, Ayoob Dinar Abdullah, Mahsa Asadi Anar, Ali Tayebi, Rahil Rahimi, Faranak Olamaeian, Nima Rahimikashkooli, Nima Kargar
Background and aim: The present study aimed to evaluate the use of 18F-2-[18F]-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose (FDG) PET/MRI (Positron emission tomography-computed tomography) in predicting the pathological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in patients with breast cancer (BC) compared to the use of MRI (Magnetic Resonance Imaging) alone.
Methods: We searched numerous databases, including PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Science Direct, using curated keywords. The variance of each study was determined using the binomial distribution, and STATA version 14 was used to analyze the data by performing random-effect models. Additionally, we calculated study heterogeneity using the chi-squared test and I2 index and utilized funnel plots and Egger tests to assess publication bias.
Results: The current investigation analyzed 239 patients from six published studies. The pooled estimated sensitivity and specificity of 18F-FDG PET/MRI was 0.91 (95% CI = 0.90 to 0.92, I2 = 100% and P = 0.000) and 0.62 (95% CI = 0.53 to 0.72, I2 = 99.8% and P = 0.000), respectively. Pooled sensitivity and specificity of MRI were 0.78 (95%CI = 0.59 to 0.96, I2 = 100% and P = 0.000) and 0.56 (95%CI = 0.33 to 0.80, I2 = 99.8% and P = 0.000), respectively.
Conclusions: Based on our findings, the combined form of 18F-FDG PET/MRI imaging is more sensitive and specific than MRI alone for predicting response to NAC in BC patients.
背景和目的:本研究旨在评估18F-2-[18F]-氟-2-脱氧葡萄糖(FDG)PET/MRI(正电子发射断层扫描-计算机断层扫描)在预测乳腺癌(BC)患者对新辅助化疗(NAC)的病理反应方面的应用,并与单独使用MRI(磁共振成像)进行比较:方法:我们使用已设定的关键词检索了众多数据库,包括 PubMed、Scopus、Embase 和 Science Direct。使用二项分布确定了每项研究的方差,并使用 STATA 14 版通过随机效应模型对数据进行分析。此外,我们还利用卡方检验和I2指数计算了研究的异质性,并利用漏斗图和Egger检验评估了发表偏倚:本次调查分析了六项已发表研究中的 239 名患者。18F-FDG PET/MRI 的集合估计灵敏度和特异性分别为 0.91(95% CI = 0.90 至 0.92,I2 = 100%,P = 0.000)和 0.62(95% CI = 0.53 至 0.72,I2 = 99.8%,P = 0.000)。核磁共振成像的汇总敏感性和特异性分别为0.78(95%CI=0.59至0.96,I2=100%,P=0.000)和0.56(95%CI=0.33至0.80,I2=99.8%,P=0.000):根据我们的研究结果,在预测 BC 患者对 NAC 的反应方面,18F-FDG PET/MRI 联合成像比单独 MRI 更敏感、更特异。
{"title":"The role of <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/MRI in assessing pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Milad Ghanikolahloo, Hayder Jasim Taher, Ayoob Dinar Abdullah, Mahsa Asadi Anar, Ali Tayebi, Rahil Rahimi, Faranak Olamaeian, Nima Rahimikashkooli, Nima Kargar","doi":"10.1186/s13014-024-02507-5","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s13014-024-02507-5","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aim: </strong>The present study aimed to evaluate the use of <sup>18</sup>F-2-[<sup>18</sup>F]-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose (FDG) PET/MRI (Positron emission tomography-computed tomography) in predicting the pathological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in patients with breast cancer (BC) compared to the use of MRI (Magnetic Resonance Imaging) alone.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched numerous databases, including PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Science Direct, using curated keywords. The variance of each study was determined using the binomial distribution, and STATA version 14 was used to analyze the data by performing random-effect models. Additionally, we calculated study heterogeneity using the chi-squared test and I<sup>2</sup> index and utilized funnel plots and Egger tests to assess publication bias.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The current investigation analyzed 239 patients from six published studies. The pooled estimated sensitivity and specificity of <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/MRI was 0.91 (95% CI = 0.90 to 0.92, I<sup>2</sup> = 100% and P = 0.000) and 0.62 (95% CI = 0.53 to 0.72, I<sup>2</sup> = 99.8% and P = 0.000), respectively. Pooled sensitivity and specificity of MRI were 0.78 (95%CI = 0.59 to 0.96, I<sup>2</sup> = 100% and P = 0.000) and 0.56 (95%CI = 0.33 to 0.80, I<sup>2</sup> = 99.8% and P = 0.000), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Based on our findings, the combined form of <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/MRI imaging is more sensitive and specific than MRI alone for predicting response to NAC in BC patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":49639,"journal":{"name":"Radiation Oncology","volume":"19 1","pages":"164"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11577720/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142676233","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: The potential of carbon ion radiation therapy (CIRT) as a curative treatment for localized prostate cancer (PCa) has garnered attention due to its characteristic dose distribution. We prospectively collected and analyzed over five years to investigate the outcomes of localized PCa treated with CIRT at our institution.
Patients and methods: The study included patients with histologically confirmed prostate adenocarcinoma. CIRT treatment was administered at a total dose of 57.6 Gy (RBE) in 16 fractions over four weeks. Uroflowmetry (UFM) and residual urine measurements were performed at various time points: before CIRT treatment, one month after starting CIRT, three months after treatment, and annually for five years starting from 1 year after the completion of CIRT. Prostate volume was measured using transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS).
Results: A total of 304 prostate cancer patients were analyzed. UFM parameters were significantly worsened immediately after the treatment. However, they recovered to pretreatment levels after three months and remained stable until five years post-treatment. Notably, Average flow rate showed significant improvement after three years of treatment compared to before the treatment. Prostate volume decreased to 80% of baseline in patients treated with CIRT alone and to 60-70% of baseline in those receiving combined CIRT and either short- or long-term ADT. The logistic-binomial analysis identified post-voiding residual urine volume (PVR) as a significant factor for predicting adverse events in the acute phase.
Conclusions: Following CIRT treatment, the voiding parameters in PCa patients significantly deteriorated immediately. However, after three months, they returned to their pre-treatment levels and remained stable for five years.
{"title":"Analysis of urinary function and prostate volume changes in localized prostate cancer patients treated with carbon-ion radiotherapy; a prospective study.","authors":"Yoshiyuki Miyazawa, Hiroshi Nakayama, Hidemasa Kawamura, Yuhei Miyasaka, Masahiro Onishi, Takuya Kaminuma, Yoshitaka Sekine, Hiroshi Matsui, Tatsuya Ohno, Kazuhiro Suzuki","doi":"10.1186/s13014-024-02563-x","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s13014-024-02563-x","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The potential of carbon ion radiation therapy (CIRT) as a curative treatment for localized prostate cancer (PCa) has garnered attention due to its characteristic dose distribution. We prospectively collected and analyzed over five years to investigate the outcomes of localized PCa treated with CIRT at our institution.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>The study included patients with histologically confirmed prostate adenocarcinoma. CIRT treatment was administered at a total dose of 57.6 Gy (RBE) in 16 fractions over four weeks. Uroflowmetry (UFM) and residual urine measurements were performed at various time points: before CIRT treatment, one month after starting CIRT, three months after treatment, and annually for five years starting from 1 year after the completion of CIRT. Prostate volume was measured using transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 304 prostate cancer patients were analyzed. UFM parameters were significantly worsened immediately after the treatment. However, they recovered to pretreatment levels after three months and remained stable until five years post-treatment. Notably, Average flow rate showed significant improvement after three years of treatment compared to before the treatment. Prostate volume decreased to 80% of baseline in patients treated with CIRT alone and to 60-70% of baseline in those receiving combined CIRT and either short- or long-term ADT. The logistic-binomial analysis identified post-voiding residual urine volume (PVR) as a significant factor for predicting adverse events in the acute phase.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Following CIRT treatment, the voiding parameters in PCa patients significantly deteriorated immediately. However, after three months, they returned to their pre-treatment levels and remained stable for five years.</p>","PeriodicalId":49639,"journal":{"name":"Radiation Oncology","volume":"19 1","pages":"165"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11577577/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142677887","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-18DOI: 10.1186/s13014-024-02552-0
Perry B Johnson, Julie Bradley, Samsun Lampotang, Amanda Jackson, David Lizdas, William Johnson, Eric Brooks, Raymond B Mailhot Vega, Nancy Mendenhall
Background: The purpose of this study is to assess the feasibility of mixed-reality (MixR) visualization for patient setup in breast and chest wall radiotherapy (RT) by performing a first-in-human clinical trial comparing MixR with a 3-point alignment.
Methods: IRB approval was granted for a study incorporating MixR during the setup process for patients undergoing proton (n = 10) or photon (n = 8) RT to the breast or chest wall. For each patient, MixR was utilized for five fractions and compared against another five fractions using 3-point alignment. During fractions with MixR, the patient was aligned by at least one therapist wearing a HoloLens 2 device who was able to guide the process by simultaneously and directly viewing the patient and a hologram of the patient's surface derived from their simulation CT scan. Alignment accuracy was quantified with cone-beam CT (CBCT) for photon treatments and CBCT plus kV/kV imaging for proton treatments. Registration time was tracked throughout the setup process as well as the amount of image guidance (IGRT) utilized for final alignment.
Results: In the proton cohort, the mean 3D shift was 0.96 cm using 3-point alignment and 1.18 cm using MixR. An equivalence test indicated that the difference in registration accuracy between the two techniques was less than 0.5 cm. In the photon cohort, the mean 3D shift was 1.18 cm using 3-point alignment and 1.00 cm using MixR. An equivalence test indicated that the difference in registration accuracy was less than 0.3 cm. Minor differences were seen in registration time and the amount of IGRT utilization.
Conclusions: MixR for patient setup for breast cancer RT is possible at the level of accuracy and efficiency provided by a 3-point alignment. Further developments in marker tracking, feedback, and a better understanding of the perceptual challenges of MixR are needed to achieve a similar level of accuracy as provided by modern surface-guided radiotherapy (SGRT) systems.
Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, UFHPTI 2015-BR05: Improving Breast Radiotherapy Setup and Delivery Using Mixed-Reality Visualization, NCT05178927.
{"title":"First-in-human trial using mixed-reality visualization for patient setup during breast or chest wall radiotherapy.","authors":"Perry B Johnson, Julie Bradley, Samsun Lampotang, Amanda Jackson, David Lizdas, William Johnson, Eric Brooks, Raymond B Mailhot Vega, Nancy Mendenhall","doi":"10.1186/s13014-024-02552-0","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s13014-024-02552-0","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The purpose of this study is to assess the feasibility of mixed-reality (MixR) visualization for patient setup in breast and chest wall radiotherapy (RT) by performing a first-in-human clinical trial comparing MixR with a 3-point alignment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>IRB approval was granted for a study incorporating MixR during the setup process for patients undergoing proton (n = 10) or photon (n = 8) RT to the breast or chest wall. For each patient, MixR was utilized for five fractions and compared against another five fractions using 3-point alignment. During fractions with MixR, the patient was aligned by at least one therapist wearing a HoloLens 2 device who was able to guide the process by simultaneously and directly viewing the patient and a hologram of the patient's surface derived from their simulation CT scan. Alignment accuracy was quantified with cone-beam CT (CBCT) for photon treatments and CBCT plus kV/kV imaging for proton treatments. Registration time was tracked throughout the setup process as well as the amount of image guidance (IGRT) utilized for final alignment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the proton cohort, the mean 3D shift was 0.96 cm using 3-point alignment and 1.18 cm using MixR. An equivalence test indicated that the difference in registration accuracy between the two techniques was less than 0.5 cm. In the photon cohort, the mean 3D shift was 1.18 cm using 3-point alignment and 1.00 cm using MixR. An equivalence test indicated that the difference in registration accuracy was less than 0.3 cm. Minor differences were seen in registration time and the amount of IGRT utilization.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>MixR for patient setup for breast cancer RT is possible at the level of accuracy and efficiency provided by a 3-point alignment. Further developments in marker tracking, feedback, and a better understanding of the perceptual challenges of MixR are needed to achieve a similar level of accuracy as provided by modern surface-guided radiotherapy (SGRT) systems.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov, UFHPTI 2015-BR05: Improving Breast Radiotherapy Setup and Delivery Using Mixed-Reality Visualization, NCT05178927.</p>","PeriodicalId":49639,"journal":{"name":"Radiation Oncology","volume":"19 1","pages":"163"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2024-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11574990/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142669696","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-14DOI: 10.1186/s13014-024-02557-9
Mengyuan Chen, Zehua Sun, Jingcong Pan, Yujin Xu, Yuezhen Wang, Ming Chen, Xiao Hu
Purposes: To evaluate the impact of prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) on the prognosis of patients with limited-stage small cell lung cancer (SCLC) in the era of MRI surveillance.
Methods: Limited-stage SCLC patients with complete remission (CR) or partial remission (PR) of tumor after definitive chemo-radiotherapy (CRT) were retrospectively analyzed. Survival data were calculated by Kaplan-Meier methods, Cox proportional hazards model was applied for multivariate prognostic analysis.
Results: Between June 2002 and January 2017, 620 patients with limited-stage SCLC were accrued in our study. After CRT, 228 (36.8%) patients achieved CR, of whom, 29 patients did not receive PCI, among the rest 199 patients, 172 (86.4%) received brain MRI to exclude brain metastasis (BM) before PCI. With a median follow-up time of 25.6 months, the cumulative BM rate was 17.1% and 37.9% in patients who received or did not receive PCI (P = 0.011). The median survival time was 30.2 months and 30.5 months, respectively and the 1 -, 3 -, 5-year survival rates were 93.7%, 42.9%, 35.8% and 83.4%, 46.5%, 41.9%, respectively (P = 0.98). Multivariate analysis indicated that baseline KPS ≥ 90 was a favorable independent prognostic factor for OS in CR patients (HR: 0.33, 95% CI: 0.23-0.46, P = 0.000). After CRT, 392 (63.2%) patients achieved PR, 53 cases did not receive PCI and 310 (91.4%) of the remaining 339 patients received brain MRI before PCI. With a median follow-up time of 15.5 months, the cumulative brain metastasis rate was 12.7% and 46.2% respectively (P = 0.000). The median survival time was 25.7 months and 18.6 months, respectively. The 1 -, 3 -, and 5-year survival rates were 87.6%, 40.2%, 29.2% and 75.7%, 16.7%, 10.3% (P = 0.000). Baseline KPS ≥ 90 (HR: 0.32, 95% CI: 0.25-0.41, P = 0.000) and PCI (HR: 0.57, 95% CI: 0.41-0.79, P = 0.001) were favorable prognostic factors for OS in PR patients.
Conclusions: In this study, PCI significantly reduced the incidence of BM in patients with limited-stage SCLC who were evaluated as CR and PR after CRT, but it has no significantly positive impact on overall survival in CR patients. Further prospective randomized studies were warranted.
{"title":"The impact of Prophylactic cranial irradiation on the prognosis of patients with limited-stage small cell lung cancer in the MRI era.","authors":"Mengyuan Chen, Zehua Sun, Jingcong Pan, Yujin Xu, Yuezhen Wang, Ming Chen, Xiao Hu","doi":"10.1186/s13014-024-02557-9","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s13014-024-02557-9","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purposes: </strong>To evaluate the impact of prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) on the prognosis of patients with limited-stage small cell lung cancer (SCLC) in the era of MRI surveillance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Limited-stage SCLC patients with complete remission (CR) or partial remission (PR) of tumor after definitive chemo-radiotherapy (CRT) were retrospectively analyzed. Survival data were calculated by Kaplan-Meier methods, Cox proportional hazards model was applied for multivariate prognostic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between June 2002 and January 2017, 620 patients with limited-stage SCLC were accrued in our study. After CRT, 228 (36.8%) patients achieved CR, of whom, 29 patients did not receive PCI, among the rest 199 patients, 172 (86.4%) received brain MRI to exclude brain metastasis (BM) before PCI. With a median follow-up time of 25.6 months, the cumulative BM rate was 17.1% and 37.9% in patients who received or did not receive PCI (P = 0.011). The median survival time was 30.2 months and 30.5 months, respectively and the 1 -, 3 -, 5-year survival rates were 93.7%, 42.9%, 35.8% and 83.4%, 46.5%, 41.9%, respectively (P = 0.98). Multivariate analysis indicated that baseline KPS ≥ 90 was a favorable independent prognostic factor for OS in CR patients (HR: 0.33, 95% CI: 0.23-0.46, P = 0.000). After CRT, 392 (63.2%) patients achieved PR, 53 cases did not receive PCI and 310 (91.4%) of the remaining 339 patients received brain MRI before PCI. With a median follow-up time of 15.5 months, the cumulative brain metastasis rate was 12.7% and 46.2% respectively (P = 0.000). The median survival time was 25.7 months and 18.6 months, respectively. The 1 -, 3 -, and 5-year survival rates were 87.6%, 40.2%, 29.2% and 75.7%, 16.7%, 10.3% (P = 0.000). Baseline KPS ≥ 90 (HR: 0.32, 95% CI: 0.25-0.41, P = 0.000) and PCI (HR: 0.57, 95% CI: 0.41-0.79, P = 0.001) were favorable prognostic factors for OS in PR patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this study, PCI significantly reduced the incidence of BM in patients with limited-stage SCLC who were evaluated as CR and PR after CRT, but it has no significantly positive impact on overall survival in CR patients. Further prospective randomized studies were warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":49639,"journal":{"name":"Radiation Oncology","volume":"19 1","pages":"162"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11566379/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142631454","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: Craniopharyngioma is a rare and slow-growing benign sellar or parasellar epithelial tumor. The number of patients receiving proton beam therapy (PBT) has increased. This study aimed to systematically evaluate and analyze the comprehensive evidence regarding the safety and efficacy of PBT for craniopharyngioma.
Methods: We searched four databases: the Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science. The period was from their inception to February 16, 2024. Two researchers independently screened the literature and extracted data.
Results: Among 486 candidate articles, eight studies were included in our study. Exactly 393 patients with craniopharyngioma underwent PBT in these studies. These studies reported data on survival and toxicity. The median sample size was 42.5 patients. The median age was 9.1-37 years; the female proportion was 48.9%, and the median follow-up time was 29-91.4 months. All patients were treated once daily, five times a week, with a fraction of 1.8 Gy (RBE) per session. The median total dose was 54.0 Gy (RBE). The local control rates at 3 and 5 years in these studies were 99% and 93%, respectively. The overall survival rates at 3 and 5 years in these studies were both 100%. The incidence of acute and late toxicities was mainly grade 1-2. The main late toxicities included vascular and visual toxicities, hypothalamic obesity, endocrinopathy, and panhypopituitarism.
Conclusions: PBT for craniopharyngioma, especially in children and adolescents, has shown impressive local control and acceptable acute and late toxicities.
{"title":"Proton beam therapy for craniopharyngioma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Zhi Li, Qingyong Li, Haidong Tian, Maoqing Wang, Ru Lin, Juan Bai, Dandan Wang, Meng Dong","doi":"10.1186/s13014-024-02556-w","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s13014-024-02556-w","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Craniopharyngioma is a rare and slow-growing benign sellar or parasellar epithelial tumor. The number of patients receiving proton beam therapy (PBT) has increased. This study aimed to systematically evaluate and analyze the comprehensive evidence regarding the safety and efficacy of PBT for craniopharyngioma.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched four databases: the Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science. The period was from their inception to February 16, 2024. Two researchers independently screened the literature and extracted data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 486 candidate articles, eight studies were included in our study. Exactly 393 patients with craniopharyngioma underwent PBT in these studies. These studies reported data on survival and toxicity. The median sample size was 42.5 patients. The median age was 9.1-37 years; the female proportion was 48.9%, and the median follow-up time was 29-91.4 months. All patients were treated once daily, five times a week, with a fraction of 1.8 Gy (RBE) per session. The median total dose was 54.0 Gy (RBE). The local control rates at 3 and 5 years in these studies were 99% and 93%, respectively. The overall survival rates at 3 and 5 years in these studies were both 100%. The incidence of acute and late toxicities was mainly grade 1-2. The main late toxicities included vascular and visual toxicities, hypothalamic obesity, endocrinopathy, and panhypopituitarism.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PBT for craniopharyngioma, especially in children and adolescents, has shown impressive local control and acceptable acute and late toxicities.</p>","PeriodicalId":49639,"journal":{"name":"Radiation Oncology","volume":"19 1","pages":"161"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11566716/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142631449","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-13DOI: 10.1186/s13014-024-02545-z
Noha Roshdy Salem, Ahmed Eldib, E M El-Sayed, Ehab Mostafa, Omar S Desouky
Background: Pulsed low dose rate radiotherapy (PLDR) is a new radiation delivery method, in which the fractional dose is divided into sub-fractional doses with periodical time breaks in between. The goal of our study is to assess the toxicity on healthy tissues resulting from PLDR as compared to conventional radiotherapy (CRT) using the same physical X-ray dose.
Methods: We analyzed the weight and survival time for CRT and PLDR groups and studied the inflammatory cytokine transforming Growth Factor-β (TGF-β), usually released following irradiation. Histopathological and immunohistochemical analyses were conducted for intestinal and bone marrow tissues from rats subjected to 8 Gy whole- body irradiation using CRT and PLDR techniques. We investigated genotoxicity by performing a comet assay (CA) in splenic tissues.
Results: Our findings showed an improvement in survival time with PLDR versus CRT by 82%.The mean survival time for CRT rats' group was 6.3 days, while it was 35.9 days for PLDR group.The weight of CRT group decreased gradually by 3.7%, while weight of PLDR group increased gradually by 2.4%.CRT resulted in more cellular atrophy in bone marrow and intestinal tissues than in PLDR treatments as shown by hematoxylin and eosin staining analysis. In addition, the transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) expression in bone marrow and intestinal tissues of CRT was higher than those expressed in tissues from PLDR as demonstrated by the Immuno reactive score (IRS). It was10(0.53) and 9.8(0.55) for BM and intestinal tissues, respectively from CRT group and 5.8(0.63) for PLDR for both tissues. The measured CA parameters were larger with CRT compared to PLDR, where the Tail Length (TL), Tail DNA % (TD%) and Tail Moment (TM) measurements were 25.4(3.4), 56.5(7.6) % and 20.5(3.5) for CRT, 7.3(1.9), 30.0(7.2) % and 5.7(1.8) for PLDR, with P value 0.000064, 0.0004 and 0.00017, respectively.
Conclusion: This study indicates that PLDR can reduce the toxicity on normal tissues compared to CRT.
{"title":"Toxicity assessment following conventional radiation therapy and pulsed low dose rate radiation therapy: an in vivo animal study.","authors":"Noha Roshdy Salem, Ahmed Eldib, E M El-Sayed, Ehab Mostafa, Omar S Desouky","doi":"10.1186/s13014-024-02545-z","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s13014-024-02545-z","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pulsed low dose rate radiotherapy (PLDR) is a new radiation delivery method, in which the fractional dose is divided into sub-fractional doses with periodical time breaks in between. The goal of our study is to assess the toxicity on healthy tissues resulting from PLDR as compared to conventional radiotherapy (CRT) using the same physical X-ray dose.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed the weight and survival time for CRT and PLDR groups and studied the inflammatory cytokine transforming Growth Factor-β (TGF-β), usually released following irradiation. Histopathological and immunohistochemical analyses were conducted for intestinal and bone marrow tissues from rats subjected to 8 Gy whole- body irradiation using CRT and PLDR techniques. We investigated genotoxicity by performing a comet assay (CA) in splenic tissues.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our findings showed an improvement in survival time with PLDR versus CRT by 82%.The mean survival time for CRT rats' group was 6.3 days, while it was 35.9 days for PLDR group.The weight of CRT group decreased gradually by 3.7%, while weight of PLDR group increased gradually by 2.4%.CRT resulted in more cellular atrophy in bone marrow and intestinal tissues than in PLDR treatments as shown by hematoxylin and eosin staining analysis. In addition, the transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) expression in bone marrow and intestinal tissues of CRT was higher than those expressed in tissues from PLDR as demonstrated by the Immuno reactive score (IRS). It was10(0.53) and 9.8(0.55) for BM and intestinal tissues, respectively from CRT group and 5.8(0.63) for PLDR for both tissues. The measured CA parameters were larger with CRT compared to PLDR, where the Tail Length (TL), Tail DNA % (TD%) and Tail Moment (TM) measurements were 25.4(3.4), 56.5(7.6) % and 20.5(3.5) for CRT, 7.3(1.9), 30.0(7.2) % and 5.7(1.8) for PLDR, with P value 0.000064, 0.0004 and 0.00017, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study indicates that PLDR can reduce the toxicity on normal tissues compared to CRT.</p>","PeriodicalId":49639,"journal":{"name":"Radiation Oncology","volume":"19 1","pages":"159"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2024-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11558818/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142631457","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is a challenging primary liver cancer with a poor prognosis, especially in unresectable cases. Traditional palliative irradiation is limited in reducing liver doses. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of respiratory-gated proton beam therapy without fiducial markers for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.
Methods: Between October 2011 and February 2022, 24 patients (median [range] age, 71 [41-88] years) were evaluated at our institution. Twelve patients were pathologically diagnosed with ICC. All patients underwent respiratory-gated proton beam therapy at a dose of 48-83.6 (relative biological effectiveness) in 20-38 fractions with four-dimensional computed tomography planning. The median follow-up period was 18.5 (range, 2.0-74.0) months. The median tumor size was 41 (range, 10-134) mm. Twenty-one patients were classified as having Child-Pugh class A, and three patients were classified as having Child-Pugh class B. Local progression was defined as any growth of the irradiated tumor.
Results: The median survival time was 28 months for all patients. The Kaplan-Meier estimates of the 2-year overall survival, progression-free survival, and local tumor control rates were 51%, 26%, and 73%, respectively. Local tumor control rates were non-inferior to those reported in previous studies using fiducial markers. One patient had grade 4 pleural effusion; however, whether this was an adverse event due to the proton beam therapy was unclear.
Conclusions: Respiratory-gated proton beam therapy without fiducial markers is an effective and less invasive treatment option for ICC, showing potential for improved local control and tolerable adverse effects.
{"title":"Respiratory-gated proton beam therapy for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma without fiducial markers.","authors":"Akihito Okubo, Sae Matsumoto, Hiroyasu Tamamura, Yoshitaka Sato, Satoko Asahi, Hitoshi Tatebe, Kazutaka Yamamoto, Keiichiro Matsushita, Makoto Sasaki, Yoshikazu Maeda, Yuji Tameshige, Hajime Sunagozaka, Hiroyuki Aoyagi, Satoshi Shibata, Shigeyuki Takamatsu, Satoshi Kobayashi","doi":"10.1186/s13014-024-02550-2","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s13014-024-02550-2","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is a challenging primary liver cancer with a poor prognosis, especially in unresectable cases. Traditional palliative irradiation is limited in reducing liver doses. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of respiratory-gated proton beam therapy without fiducial markers for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between October 2011 and February 2022, 24 patients (median [range] age, 71 [41-88] years) were evaluated at our institution. Twelve patients were pathologically diagnosed with ICC. All patients underwent respiratory-gated proton beam therapy at a dose of 48-83.6 (relative biological effectiveness) in 20-38 fractions with four-dimensional computed tomography planning. The median follow-up period was 18.5 (range, 2.0-74.0) months. The median tumor size was 41 (range, 10-134) mm. Twenty-one patients were classified as having Child-Pugh class A, and three patients were classified as having Child-Pugh class B. Local progression was defined as any growth of the irradiated tumor.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median survival time was 28 months for all patients. The Kaplan-Meier estimates of the 2-year overall survival, progression-free survival, and local tumor control rates were 51%, 26%, and 73%, respectively. Local tumor control rates were non-inferior to those reported in previous studies using fiducial markers. One patient had grade 4 pleural effusion; however, whether this was an adverse event due to the proton beam therapy was unclear.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Respiratory-gated proton beam therapy without fiducial markers is an effective and less invasive treatment option for ICC, showing potential for improved local control and tolerable adverse effects.</p>","PeriodicalId":49639,"journal":{"name":"Radiation Oncology","volume":"19 1","pages":"160"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2024-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11562633/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142631452","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}