Naval Engineers Journal最新文献

英文中文

Naval Surface Combatant Ship Design Philosophy Including Associated Organizational Impacts† 海军水面作战舰艇设计理念，包括相关组织影响†

IF 0.2 4区工程技术

Naval Engineers Journal

Pub Date : 2012-01-27 DOI: 10.1111/j.1559-3584.2011.00333.x

MYRON V. RICKETTS

引用次数: 0

American Shipbuilding and Repair Industry Welcomes Strategic Partnership with Major Defense Shipyards 美国造船和修理业欢迎与主要国防造船厂建立战略伙伴关系

IF 0.2 4区工程技术

Naval Engineers Journal

Pub Date : 2012-01-27 DOI: 10.1111/j.1559-3584.2011.00348.x

引用次数: 0

Using Agents to Model the Kill Chain of the Ballistic Missile Defense System 使用Agent建立弹道导弹防御系统杀伤链模型

IF 0.2 4区工程技术

Naval Engineers Journal

Pub Date : 2012-01-27 DOI: 10.1111/j.1559-3584.2011.00336.x

O. THOMAS HOLLAND, SARA E. WALLACE

Deterministic models have long been used to model the individual effectiveness of elements of the Ballistic Missile Defense System (BMDS). Agent-based models (ABMs) emphasize the specification of the individual components comprising a system and demonstrate higher order system properties through the interactions of those components. ABMs are particularly suited to (1) complex systems where it is easier to understand or observe the individual components rather than the dynamics that govern their interactions and (2) systems where empirical data is insufficient to provide statistical representations. New missions and capabilities desired by national leadership call for increased interaction between the BMDS elements and their subsystems. New capabilities and mission threads include launch on remote and engage on remote capabilities as well as a robust missile defense system capable of defending against threat raids, debris, and decoys. These new capabilities and mission threads may require modifications to kill chains and command and control constructs as well as improved coordination and performance. These capabilities must be realized through modifications to programs of record and integration across elements of the system that have their own independent programmatic momentum. A robust missile defense system must be achieved through a construct of layered defenses. Change in capabilities requires analysis of the complex interdependencies between Standard Missile (SM-3), SPY, and BMDS elements such as PATRIOT, Terminal High-Altitude Area Defense, Aegis Ashore Missile Defense System, etc. Synergy among the systems (termed “elements”) is required to meet the new challenges, which can be accomplished through systems of systems engineering. Definition and testing of the interactions between the systems are crucial to provide situational awareness via analysis of data transfer between the elements. ABMs are a tool that allows qualitative evaluation of these interactions of the complex BMDS. This paper presents an investigation of agent-based modeling as a method to explore the system interrelationships and evaluate the indeterminacy of the BMDS kill chain.

长期以来，确定性模型一直被用于对弹道导弹防御系统（BMDS）各要素的单独有效性进行建模。基于代理的模型（ABM）强调对组成系统的各个组件的规范，并通过这些组件的交互来展示更高阶的系统特性。ABM特别适用于（1）更容易理解或观察单个组件而不是控制其相互作用的动力学的复杂系统，以及（2）经验数据不足以提供统计表示的系统。国家领导层所期望的新任务和能力要求加强BMDS要素及其子系统之间的互动。新的能力和任务线程包括远程发射和远程交战能力，以及能够防御威胁袭击、碎片和诱饵的强大导弹防御系统。这些新的能力和任务线程可能需要对杀伤链和指挥控制结构进行修改，并改进协调和性能。这些能力必须通过对记录程序的修改和跨系统元素的集成来实现，这些元素具有自己独立的程序动力。一个强大的导弹防御系统必须通过分层防御结构来实现。能力的变化需要分析标准导弹（SM-3）、SPY和BMDS元素之间的复杂相互依存关系，如爱国者号、末段高空区域防御、宙斯盾-阿索尔导弹防御系统等。需要系统之间的协同作用（称为“元素”）来应对新的挑战，这可以通过系统工程的系统来实现。系统之间交互的定义和测试对于通过分析元素之间的数据传输来提供态势感知至关重要。ABM是一种可以对复杂BMDS的这些相互作用进行定性评估的工具。本文研究了基于代理的建模方法，以此来探索系统的相互关系并评估BMDS杀伤链的不确定性。

{"title":"Using Agents to Model the Kill Chain of the Ballistic Missile Defense System","authors":"O. THOMAS HOLLAND, SARA E. WALLACE","doi":"10.1111/j.1559-3584.2011.00336.x","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-3584.2011.00336.x","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Deterministic models have long been used to model the individual effectiveness of elements of the Ballistic Missile Defense System (BMDS). Agent-based models (ABMs) emphasize the specification of the individual components comprising a system and demonstrate higher order system properties through the interactions of those components. ABMs are particularly suited to (1) complex systems where it is easier to understand or observe the individual components rather than the dynamics that govern their interactions and (2) systems where empirical data is insufficient to provide statistical representations. New missions and capabilities desired by national leadership call for increased interaction between the BMDS elements and their subsystems. New capabilities and mission threads include launch on remote and engage on remote capabilities as well as a robust missile defense system capable of defending against threat raids, debris, and decoys. These new capabilities and mission threads may require modifications to kill chains and command and control constructs as well as improved coordination and performance. These capabilities must be realized through modifications to programs of record and integration across elements of the system that have their own independent programmatic momentum. A robust missile defense system must be achieved through a construct of layered defenses. Change in capabilities requires analysis of the complex interdependencies between Standard Missile (SM-3), SPY, and BMDS elements such as PATRIOT, Terminal High-Altitude Area Defense, Aegis Ashore Missile Defense System, etc. Synergy among the systems (termed “elements”) is required to meet the new challenges, which can be accomplished through systems of systems engineering. Definition and testing of the interactions between the systems are crucial to provide situational awareness via analysis of data transfer between the elements. ABMs are a tool that allows qualitative evaluation of these interactions of the complex BMDS. This paper presents an investigation of agent-based modeling as a method to explore the system interrelationships and evaluate the indeterminacy of the BMDS kill chain.</p>","PeriodicalId":49775,"journal":{"name":"Naval Engineers Journal","volume":"123 3","pages":"141-151"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2,"publicationDate":"2012-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/j.1559-3584.2011.00336.x","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"72330357","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 11

STATE OF THE THE SOCIETY ADDRESS 国情咨文

IF 0.2 4区工程技术

Naval Engineers Journal

Pub Date : 2012-01-27 DOI: 10.1111/j.1559-3584.2011.00340.x

Ms. Kathleen E. Hinton

引用次数: 0

NAVSEA Technical and Acquisition Personnel† NAVSEA技术和采办人员†

IF 0.2 4区工程技术

Naval Engineers Journal

Pub Date : 2012-01-27 DOI: 10.1111/j.1559-3584.2011.00334.x

MYRON V. RICKETTS

引用次数: 0

SECRETARY'S NOTES 秘书的笔记

IF 0.2 4区工程技术

Naval Engineers Journal

Pub Date : 2012-01-27 DOI: 10.1111/j.1559-3584.2011.00339.x

Captain Dennis K. Kruse USN (Ret.)

引用次数: 0

Naval Ship Integration – Can It Be Done? 海军舰艇集成——可以实现吗？

IF 0.2 4区工程技术

Naval Engineers Journal

Pub Date : 2012-01-27 DOI: 10.1111/j.1559-3584.2011.00346.x

ALFRED SKOLNICK

引用次数: 0

ASNE CORPORATE SUPPORTERS ASNE企业支持者

IF 0.2 4区工程技术

Naval Engineers Journal

Pub Date : 2012-01-27 DOI: 10.1111/j.1559-3584.2011.00342.x

引用次数: 0

High‐Level Methodologies to Evaluate Naval Task Groups 评估海军任务小组的高级方法

IF 0.2 4区工程技术

Naval Engineers Journal

Pub Date : 2011-12-01 DOI: 10.1111/J.1559-3584.2010.00264.X

R. Martens, Mark Rempel

Defense organizations within many nations (e.g., United States and Canada), use capability-based planning (CBP) to guide their force development processes. A key element of the CBP process is testing current and proposed capabilities against force planning scenarios, particularly for asset evaluation. This analysis involves a wide range of capabilities, and thus is a multicriteria problem. Comparison of alternatives using multiple criteria is challenging, and often is assisted by aggregation techniques. Set in a naval context, this paper presents three high-level capability aggregation techniques: the vector method, star plot method, and wedge method. Each method aggregates naval task group capabilities, with respect to a scenario, into three quantifiable measures: effectiveness, unmatched, and unused. As with numerous techniques, the effectiveness gauges the ability of a task group to meet a set of scenario requirements. The unmatched and unused measures yield insight into capability gaps, which is an important aspect of CBP. The unmatched metric measures scenario requirements that are not provided by a task group and the unused metric measures task group capabilities that are not required by a scenario. An application of the methods is presented, including a discussion of their strengths and weaknesses. Based on this work, it is concluded that the vector method is the best of the three presented.

许多国家的国防组织(例如，美国和加拿大)使用基于能力的规划(CBP)来指导他们的部队发展过程。CBP流程的一个关键要素是根据部队规划方案测试当前和拟议的能力，特别是在资产评估方面。这种分析涉及范围广泛的功能，因此是一个多标准问题。使用多个标准对备选方案进行比较是具有挑战性的，通常需要借助聚合技术。本文以海军为背景，提出了三种高级能力聚合技术:矢量法、星形图法和楔形法。每种方法都将海军任务组的能力汇总为三个可量化的指标:有效性、不匹配和未使用。与许多技术一样，有效性衡量任务组满足一组场景需求的能力。不匹配和未使用的测量可以洞察能力差距，这是CBP的一个重要方面。未匹配的度量度量任务组未提供的场景需求，未使用的度量度量场景不需要的任务组功能。介绍了这些方法的应用，并讨论了它们的优缺点。在此基础上，得出了矢量法是三种方法中最好的一种。

{"title":"High‐Level Methodologies to Evaluate Naval Task Groups","authors":"R. Martens, Mark Rempel","doi":"10.1111/J.1559-3584.2010.00264.X","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1559-3584.2010.00264.X","url":null,"abstract":"Defense organizations within many nations (e.g., United States and Canada), use capability-based planning (CBP) to guide their force development processes. A key element of the CBP process is testing current and proposed capabilities against force planning scenarios, particularly for asset evaluation. This analysis involves a wide range of capabilities, and thus is a multicriteria problem. Comparison of alternatives using multiple criteria is challenging, and often is assisted by aggregation techniques. Set in a naval context, this paper presents three high-level capability aggregation techniques: the vector method, star plot method, and wedge method. Each method aggregates naval task group capabilities, with respect to a scenario, into three quantifiable measures: effectiveness, unmatched, and unused. As with numerous techniques, the effectiveness gauges the ability of a task group to meet a set of scenario requirements. The unmatched and unused measures yield insight into capability gaps, which is an important aspect of CBP. The unmatched metric measures scenario requirements that are not provided by a task group and the unused metric measures task group capabilities that are not required by a scenario. An application of the methods is presented, including a discussion of their strengths and weaknesses. Based on this work, it is concluded that the vector method is the best of the three presented.","PeriodicalId":49775,"journal":{"name":"Naval Engineers Journal","volume":"76 1","pages":"67-80"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2,"publicationDate":"2011-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"77404368","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

It is Not Just Hardware and Software, Anymore! Human Systems Integration in US Submarines 它不再仅仅是硬件和软件!美国潜艇的人机系统集成

IF 0.2 4区工程技术

Naval Engineers Journal

Pub Date : 2011-12-01 DOI: 10.1111/J.1559-3584.2009.00198.X

Patricia S. Hamburger, David Miskimens, S. Truver

Until recently, the Navy's approach to designing, engineering, and acquiring complex weapon systems did not routinely or completely include the human “warrior” as an integral part of the system. Rather, the Navy viewed systems as combinations of hardware and software. The results were often less-than-optimal capability and high life-cycle cost—and, sometimes, even mission failure. Given the high rate of technological change and the need to rein in cost in the face of increasingly constrained budgets, the Navy and the other services have increasingly embraced the need to consider human-performance capabilities and limitations up front and on an equal footing with hardware and software—as integral elements in both new-acquisition and technology-refresh programs. The US Submarine Force has championed human systems integration (HSI). HSI is a specialized engineering discipline that takes human limitations and capabilities fully into account to influence system design and engineering early in the research, development, and acquisition process, thereby helping to ensure the highest overall performance at the lowest total ownership cost. Implementation of HSI has involved new partnerships with unlikely partners such as the audio equipment company Bose, game-makers, the visual-reality industry, physiologists, and psychologists. Nowhere has this been more apparent than in the Virginia (SSN-774)-Class Nuclear Attack Submarine Program.

直到最近，海军设计、工程和获取复杂武器系统的方法并没有常规地或完全地将人类“战士”作为系统的一个组成部分。相反，海军将系统视为硬件和软件的组合。其结果往往是性能不如理想，生命周期成本高，有时甚至导致任务失败。考虑到高速度的技术变革和在预算日益紧张的情况下控制成本的需要，海军和其他军种已经越来越多地接受了考虑人类性能能力和局限性的需要，并在与硬件和软件平等的基础上，作为新采买和技术更新计划的组成部分。美国潜艇部队一直倡导人类系统集成(HSI)。HSI是一门专门的工程学科，它充分考虑了人类的局限性和能力，从而在研究、开发和采购过程的早期影响系统设计和工程，从而帮助确保以最低的总拥有成本获得最高的整体性能。HSI的实施涉及与音响设备公司Bose、游戏制造商、视觉现实行业、生理学家和心理学家等意想不到的合作伙伴建立新的合作关系。这一点在弗吉尼亚(SSN-774)级核攻击潜艇项目中表现得最为明显。

{"title":"It is Not Just Hardware and Software, Anymore! Human Systems Integration in US Submarines","authors":"Patricia S. Hamburger, David Miskimens, S. Truver","doi":"10.1111/J.1559-3584.2009.00198.X","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1559-3584.2009.00198.X","url":null,"abstract":"Until recently, the Navy's approach to designing, engineering, and acquiring complex weapon systems did not routinely or completely include the human “warrior” as an integral part of the system. Rather, the Navy viewed systems as combinations of hardware and software. The results were often less-than-optimal capability and high life-cycle cost—and, sometimes, even mission failure. Given the high rate of technological change and the need to rein in cost in the face of increasingly constrained budgets, the Navy and the other services have increasingly embraced the need to consider human-performance capabilities and limitations up front and on an equal footing with hardware and software—as integral elements in both new-acquisition and technology-refresh programs. The US Submarine Force has championed human systems integration (HSI). HSI is a specialized engineering discipline that takes human limitations and capabilities fully into account to influence system design and engineering early in the research, development, and acquisition process, thereby helping to ensure the highest overall performance at the lowest total ownership cost. Implementation of HSI has involved new partnerships with unlikely partners such as the audio equipment company Bose, game-makers, the visual-reality industry, physiologists, and psychologists. Nowhere has this been more apparent than in the Virginia (SSN-774)-Class Nuclear Attack Submarine Program.","PeriodicalId":49775,"journal":{"name":"Naval Engineers Journal","volume":"6 1","pages":"41-50"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2,"publicationDate":"2011-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"85986192","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 12

首页上一页

下一页尾页

类型

全部化学•材料生命科学医学物理工程技术环境•农林材料科学地球科学法学管理学化学环境科学与生态学计算机科学教育学经济学农林科学人文科学生物学数学物理与天体物理心理学综合性期刊其他工业工程理学历史学农学文学信息工程

数据库

全部 ACS Publications Elsevier ieeexplore Springer The Royal Society of Chemistry Wiley

期刊

Naval Engineers Journal

全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.

﹀