This study investigates the accuracy of GLDAS-Noah-2.1 daily minimum soil temperature (DMST) at 0–10 cm (shallow) and 40–100 cm (deeper) depths in Khorasan Razavi, Iran, using 5 years (2008–2012) of data from 13 synoptic stations. Initial evaluations using statistical metrics revealed significant discrepancies, with GLDAS tending to overestimate DMST. The initial raw GLDAS data showed a considerable systematic error, with a bias ranging from 1.96°C to 6.0°C in the shallow profile and from 0.58°C to 6.62°C in the deeper soil profile. On average, the shallow layer performed poorly, yielding an RMSE of 4.82°C and an average bias of 3.85°C, while the deeper layer showed an average RMSE of 2.72°C and a bias of 2.14°C. To mitigate these biases, a K-nearest neighbors (KNN) supervised machine learning algorithm was employed and optimized through grid search. The KNN model dramatically enhanced performance for both layers. For the shallow depth, the average RMSE was reduced to 2.56°C (a ~47% reduction), and the average bias was reduced to 0.06°C. For the deeper layer, the average RMSE was reduced to 1.30°C (a ~52% reduction), and the average bias was reduced to 0.00°C. Furthermore, the Nash–Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE) improved from an initial average of 0.75 and 0.86–0.92 and 0.97 for the shallow and deeper layers, respectively. Post-correction, the model achieved a “Very Good” performance rating for all stations, with the average percent bias (Pbias) falling to 0.37% (shallow) and −0.08% (deeper). The results underscore the efficacy of machine learning-based bias correction in enhancing the reliability of GLDAS datasets for regional climate and agricultural applications.
{"title":"Bias Correction of GLDAS-Derived Daily Minimum Soil Temperature (DMST) in Shallow and Deeper Soil Profiles Using Supervised Machine Learning Algorithm","authors":"Abolghasem Akbari, Majid Rajabi Jaghargh, Atefeh Hosseini, Fatemeh Pakdin","doi":"10.1002/met.70115","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/met.70115","url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study investigates the accuracy of GLDAS-Noah-2.1 daily minimum soil temperature (DMST) at 0–10 cm (shallow) and 40–100 cm (deeper) depths in Khorasan Razavi, Iran, using 5 years (2008–2012) of data from 13 synoptic stations. Initial evaluations using statistical metrics revealed significant discrepancies, with GLDAS tending to overestimate DMST. The initial raw GLDAS data showed a considerable systematic error, with a bias ranging from 1.96°C to 6.0°C in the shallow profile and from 0.58°C to 6.62°C in the deeper soil profile. On average, the shallow layer performed poorly, yielding an RMSE of 4.82°C and an average bias of 3.85°C, while the deeper layer showed an average RMSE of 2.72°C and a bias of 2.14°C. To mitigate these biases, a K-nearest neighbors (KNN) supervised machine learning algorithm was employed and optimized through grid search. The KNN model dramatically enhanced performance for both layers. For the shallow depth, the average RMSE was reduced to 2.56°C (a ~47% reduction), and the average bias was reduced to 0.06°C. For the deeper layer, the average RMSE was reduced to 1.30°C (a ~52% reduction), and the average bias was reduced to 0.00°C. Furthermore, the Nash–Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE) improved from an initial average of 0.75 and 0.86–0.92 and 0.97 for the shallow and deeper layers, respectively. Post-correction, the model achieved a “Very Good” performance rating for all stations, with the average percent bias (Pbias) falling to 0.37% (shallow) and −0.08% (deeper). The results underscore the efficacy of machine learning-based bias correction in enhancing the reliability of GLDAS datasets for regional climate and agricultural applications.</p>","PeriodicalId":49825,"journal":{"name":"Meteorological Applications","volume":"32 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2025-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://rmets.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/met.70115","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145626106","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Tropical cyclone (TC) Doksuri (2023) exhibited a sudden northward turn over the northeastern part of the South China Sea (SCS). However, most global models failed to capture such track change. The US National Centers for Environmental Prediction Final Analysis (FNL) data and The International Grand Global Ensemble (TIGGE) data were therefore used to study the underlying mechanisms for the sudden track change and the factors leading to the track forecast errors of different global models so as to give some insight for the forecasters in predicting such TC track change and global model developers in modifying the model physics. The non-linear advection of the vorticity of the asymmetric winds associated with the monsoon trough over the SCS and that of the symmetric wind of the TC resulted in the sudden northward turn of the TC track. However, the strength and the eastward extension of the monsoon trough were underpredicted, leading to a westward-moving track without a sharp northward turn. On the contrary, if the strength of the monsoon trough was overpredicted, the environmental steering was over-altered, resulting in an early northward turn. The intensity and outer wind structure of the TC also played important roles in the monsoonal interaction and thus the track forecast errors.
{"title":"Monsoonal Interactions on the Track of TC Doksuri (2023) and Global Models Performance","authors":"Chi Kit Tang, Y. F. Tong, P. W. Chan","doi":"10.1002/met.70131","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/met.70131","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Tropical cyclone (TC) Doksuri (2023) exhibited a sudden northward turn over the northeastern part of the South China Sea (SCS). However, most global models failed to capture such track change. The US National Centers for Environmental Prediction Final Analysis (FNL) data and The International Grand Global Ensemble (TIGGE) data were therefore used to study the underlying mechanisms for the sudden track change and the factors leading to the track forecast errors of different global models so as to give some insight for the forecasters in predicting such TC track change and global model developers in modifying the model physics. The non-linear advection of the vorticity of the asymmetric winds associated with the monsoon trough over the SCS and that of the symmetric wind of the TC resulted in the sudden northward turn of the TC track. However, the strength and the eastward extension of the monsoon trough were underpredicted, leading to a westward-moving track without a sharp northward turn. On the contrary, if the strength of the monsoon trough was overpredicted, the environmental steering was over-altered, resulting in an early northward turn. The intensity and outer wind structure of the TC also played important roles in the monsoonal interaction and thus the track forecast errors.</p>","PeriodicalId":49825,"journal":{"name":"Meteorological Applications","volume":"32 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2025-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://rmets.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/met.70131","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145581085","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Owain Harris, Jennifer L. Catto, Stefan Siegert, Shira Raveh-Rubin
Dry intrusions are coherent airstreams that originate from the upper troposphere, or lower stratosphere, and descend towards the surface where they can influence the dynamics of mid-latitude weather. Notably, the occurrence of these airflows with atmospheric fronts and extratropical cyclones can exacerbate their impacts, leading to increased precipitation and stronger surface winds. Therefore, it is of interest to understand how dry intrusions may respond to our changing climate. Traditional identification methods with Lagrangian trajectory analysis, however, cannot always be applied to climate projection data due to the computational cost of this approach and a lack of necessary available data from climate models. This research explores the alternative application of image segmentation concepts to build a machine learning classification model for dry intrusion outflows in the North Atlantic. A U-Net convolutional neural network (CNN) is trained to predict the presence of dry intrusion objects from ERA5 atmospheric data, including temperature and relative humidity. With a catalogue of labelled dry intrusion objects calculated from trajectory analysis as predictands, the ability of this CNN to identify individual dry intrusion footprints, capture their size and shape, and recreate long-term climatologies is evaluated with Matthew's correlation coefficient and intersection over union. Compared with a multiple logistic regression model, the CNN outperforms across all metrics and compares more favourably with the target data. However, the CNN struggles to predict small dry intrusion signatures and limitations are encountered outside of the spatial training domain in a high-impact case study. Despite this, these results provide proof-of-concept for an alternative way to identify dry intrusion outflows that uses less data, is fast and easy to implement, and could be utilised to study the possible futures of dry intrusions and extreme mid-latitude weather.
{"title":"High Impact Weather in the Mid-Latitudes: A Neural Network Approach to Identifying North Atlantic Dry Intrusion Outflows","authors":"Owain Harris, Jennifer L. Catto, Stefan Siegert, Shira Raveh-Rubin","doi":"10.1002/met.70128","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/met.70128","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Dry intrusions are coherent airstreams that originate from the upper troposphere, or lower stratosphere, and descend towards the surface where they can influence the dynamics of mid-latitude weather. Notably, the occurrence of these airflows with atmospheric fronts and extratropical cyclones can exacerbate their impacts, leading to increased precipitation and stronger surface winds. Therefore, it is of interest to understand how dry intrusions may respond to our changing climate. Traditional identification methods with Lagrangian trajectory analysis, however, cannot always be applied to climate projection data due to the computational cost of this approach and a lack of necessary available data from climate models. This research explores the alternative application of image segmentation concepts to build a machine learning classification model for dry intrusion outflows in the North Atlantic. A U-Net convolutional neural network (CNN) is trained to predict the presence of dry intrusion objects from ERA5 atmospheric data, including temperature and relative humidity. With a catalogue of labelled dry intrusion objects calculated from trajectory analysis as predictands, the ability of this CNN to identify individual dry intrusion footprints, capture their size and shape, and recreate long-term climatologies is evaluated with Matthew's correlation coefficient and intersection over union. Compared with a multiple logistic regression model, the CNN outperforms across all metrics and compares more favourably with the target data. However, the CNN struggles to predict small dry intrusion signatures and limitations are encountered outside of the spatial training domain in a high-impact case study. Despite this, these results provide proof-of-concept for an alternative way to identify dry intrusion outflows that uses less data, is fast and easy to implement, and could be utilised to study the possible futures of dry intrusions and extreme mid-latitude weather.</p>","PeriodicalId":49825,"journal":{"name":"Meteorological Applications","volume":"32 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2025-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://rmets.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/met.70128","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145580975","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Near-surface observations can suffer from significant representativeness errors, especially for Numerical Weather Prediction (NWP) at lower resolution in global applications. Therefore, in Data Assimilation (DA), many operational centers have long been reluctant to assimilate them (e.g., the European Center for Medium-range Weather Forecast, ECMWF, started assimilating all 6-h screen-level temperature reports only in 2024). For forecast verification, some studies advocate that we should not rely on them and use only verification against our own near-surface analyses. At Environment and Climate Change Canada (ECCC), both temperature and humidity observations from SYNOPs have been assimilated in our global NWP system for more than two decades and, in June 2024, METARs have been added following some positive impacts found only when comparing forecasts against near-surface observations. To shed light on the impact of the assimilation of screen-level observations, in this study we present an evaluation of the impact of removing the assimilation of all screen-level temperature and humidity observations using various verification references: the NWP forecasts were evaluated against radiosondes and surface observations, independent (ECMWF) analysis, our own analysis and surface analysis. Results show that, despite the lack of a proper estimation of representativeness errors in the DA approach, the assimilation of screen-level temperature and humidity leads to forecast improvements that can be detected from the verification against independent measurement sources, here radiosondes and ECMWF upper-air analyses. Verification against own analyses, for both upper-air and screen-level variables, led instead to opposite and misleading conclusions. In fact, the removal of assimilated screen-level temperature and humidity measurements renders the NWP forecast more similar to the own analysis, therefore leading to better scores but detachment from the observed world.
{"title":"On the Reliability of Surface Observations and the Pitfalls of Verification Against Own Analyses","authors":"Jean-François Caron, Barbara Casati","doi":"10.1002/met.70129","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/met.70129","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Near-surface observations can suffer from significant representativeness errors, especially for Numerical Weather Prediction (NWP) at lower resolution in global applications. Therefore, in Data Assimilation (DA), many operational centers have long been reluctant to assimilate them (e.g., the European Center for Medium-range Weather Forecast, ECMWF, started assimilating all 6-h screen-level temperature reports only in 2024). For forecast verification, some studies advocate that we should not rely on them and use only verification against our own near-surface analyses. At Environment and Climate Change Canada (ECCC), both temperature and humidity observations from SYNOPs have been assimilated in our global NWP system for more than two decades and, in June 2024, METARs have been added following some positive impacts found only when comparing forecasts against near-surface observations. To shed light on the impact of the assimilation of screen-level observations, in this study we present an evaluation of the impact of removing the assimilation of all screen-level temperature and humidity observations using various verification references: the NWP forecasts were evaluated against radiosondes and surface observations, independent (ECMWF) analysis, our own analysis and surface analysis. Results show that, despite the lack of a proper estimation of representativeness errors in the DA approach, the assimilation of screen-level temperature and humidity leads to forecast improvements that can be detected from the verification against independent measurement sources, here radiosondes and ECMWF upper-air analyses. Verification against own analyses, for both upper-air and screen-level variables, led instead to opposite and misleading conclusions. In fact, the removal of assimilated screen-level temperature and humidity measurements renders the NWP forecast more similar to the own analysis, therefore leading to better scores but detachment from the observed world.</p>","PeriodicalId":49825,"journal":{"name":"Meteorological Applications","volume":"32 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2025-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://rmets.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/met.70129","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145580717","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
<p>A major aim of weather and other types of environmental forecasting is to provide early warning of extreme hazards that can then be used to take preventative actions to reduce loss. This study investigates what determines the loss distribution in the simplest context of repeatedly predicting/diagnosing the occurrence or not of a severe event/condition. Mathematical expressions for the expected total loss and variance of the total loss are derived in terms of the probability of event occurrence (the base rate), the cost-loss ratio and the hit rate (H) and false alarm rate (F) of the forecasting system. Expected loss and variance behave very differently as functions of hit and false alarm rate: expected loss is a linear function of <span></span><math>