Robert Neal, Joanne Robbins, Ric Crocker, Dave Cox, Keith Fenwick, Jonathan Millard, Jason Kelly
This paper describes a new seamless blended multi-model ensemble configuration of an existing probabilistic medium- to extended-range weather pattern forecasting tool (called Decider) run operationally at the Met Office. In its initial configuration, the tool calculated and presented probabilistic weather pattern forecast information for five individual ensemble forecasting systems, which varied in terms of their number of ensemble members, horizontal resolution, update frequencies and forecast lead time. This resulted in multiple forecasts for the same validity time which varied in terms of forecast skill depending on the lead time in question. This presented challenges for end-users (e.g., operational meteorologists) in terms of knowing which forecast output is best to use and at which lead time, as well as knowing what to do in situations where forecasts varied between ensembles. To get around these challenges, a new seamless blended multi-model ensemble configuration has been implemented operationally, comprising of output from five separate ensembles, and provides a single best forecast from day one out to day 45. Objective verification for a set of eight weather pattern groups covering forecasts initialized over a 6-year period (2017–2022) shows that the seamless blended multi-model ensemble forecasts are at least as good as, if not better than the best performing individual model.
{"title":"A seamless blended multi-model ensemble approach to probabilistic medium-range weather pattern forecasts over the UK","authors":"Robert Neal, Joanne Robbins, Ric Crocker, Dave Cox, Keith Fenwick, Jonathan Millard, Jason Kelly","doi":"10.1002/met.2179","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/met.2179","url":null,"abstract":"<p>This paper describes a new seamless blended multi-model ensemble configuration of an existing probabilistic medium- to extended-range weather pattern forecasting tool (called Decider) run operationally at the Met Office. In its initial configuration, the tool calculated and presented probabilistic weather pattern forecast information for five individual ensemble forecasting systems, which varied in terms of their number of ensemble members, horizontal resolution, update frequencies and forecast lead time. This resulted in multiple forecasts for the same validity time which varied in terms of forecast skill depending on the lead time in question. This presented challenges for end-users (e.g., operational meteorologists) in terms of knowing which forecast output is best to use and at which lead time, as well as knowing what to do in situations where forecasts varied between ensembles. To get around these challenges, a new seamless blended multi-model ensemble configuration has been implemented operationally, comprising of output from five separate ensembles, and provides a single best forecast from day one out to day 45. Objective verification for a set of eight weather pattern groups covering forecasts initialized over a 6-year period (2017–2022) shows that the seamless blended multi-model ensemble forecasts are at least as good as, if not better than the best performing individual model.</p>","PeriodicalId":49825,"journal":{"name":"Meteorological Applications","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2024-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/met.2179","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139901689","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Yiming Sun, Ian Simpson, Hua-Liang Wei, Edward Hanna
Dynamical seasonal forecast models are improving with time but tend to underestimate the amplitude of atmospheric circulation variability and to have lower skill in predicting summer variability than in winter. Here, we construct Nonlinear AutoRegressive Moving Average models with eXogenous inputs (NARMAX) to develop the analysis of drivers of North Atlantic atmospheric circulation and jet-stream variability, focusing on the East Atlantic (EA) and Scandinavian (SCA) patterns as well as the North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO) index. New time series of these indices are developed from empirical orthogonal function (EOF) analysis. Geopotential height data from the ERA5 reanalysis are used to generate the EOFs. Sets of predictors with known associations with these drivers are developed and used to formulate a sliding-window NARMAX model. This model demonstrates a high degree of predictive accuracy, as indicated by its average correlation coefficients over the testing period (2006–2021): 0.78 for NAO, 0.83 for EA and 0.68 for SCA. In comparison, the SEAS5 and GloSea5 dynamical forecast models exhibit lower correlations with observed circulation changes: for NAO, the correlation coefficients are 0.51 for SEAS5 and 0.34 for GloSea5, for EA they are 0.15 and 0.09, respectively, and for SCA, they are 0.28 and 0.24, respectively. Comparison of NARMAX predictions with forecasts and hindcasts from the SEAS5 and GloSea5 models highlights areas where NARMAX can be used to help improve seasonal forecast skill and inform the development of dynamical models, especially in the case of summer.
{"title":"Probabilistic seasonal forecasts of North Atlantic atmospheric circulation using complex systems modelling and comparison with dynamical models","authors":"Yiming Sun, Ian Simpson, Hua-Liang Wei, Edward Hanna","doi":"10.1002/met.2178","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/met.2178","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Dynamical seasonal forecast models are improving with time but tend to underestimate the amplitude of atmospheric circulation variability and to have lower skill in predicting summer variability than in winter. Here, we construct Nonlinear AutoRegressive Moving Average models with eXogenous inputs (NARMAX) to develop the analysis of drivers of North Atlantic atmospheric circulation and jet-stream variability, focusing on the East Atlantic (EA) and Scandinavian (SCA) patterns as well as the North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO) index. New time series of these indices are developed from empirical orthogonal function (EOF) analysis. Geopotential height data from the ERA5 reanalysis are used to generate the EOFs. Sets of predictors with known associations with these drivers are developed and used to formulate a sliding-window NARMAX model. This model demonstrates a high degree of predictive accuracy, as indicated by its average correlation coefficients over the testing period (2006–2021): 0.78 for NAO, 0.83 for EA and 0.68 for SCA. In comparison, the SEAS5 and GloSea5 dynamical forecast models exhibit lower correlations with observed circulation changes: for NAO, the correlation coefficients are 0.51 for SEAS5 and 0.34 for GloSea5, for EA they are 0.15 and 0.09, respectively, and for SCA, they are 0.28 and 0.24, respectively. Comparison of NARMAX predictions with forecasts and hindcasts from the SEAS5 and GloSea5 models highlights areas where NARMAX can be used to help improve seasonal forecast skill and inform the development of dynamical models, especially in the case of summer.</p>","PeriodicalId":49825,"journal":{"name":"Meteorological Applications","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2024-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/met.2178","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139744917","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Biomass burning (BB) as an important atmospheric carbon source has significant environmental and climatic influence. The frequent extreme BB cases in recent years have raised extensive concerns, yet the latest changes in BB emission on a global scale are not fully understood. Here, we systematically quantify the changes in BB carbon emission for 1999–2022 by fire types and on different scales based on the Global Fire Emissions Database with small fires (GFED4s) dataset. We find contrasting trends of savanna and boreal forest fires persistent over the study period, shaping the variation of global total BB carbon emission. The receding savanna fire drives a declining global BB carbon emission at −8 Tg C year−1 (−0.4% year−1) for 1999–2022, while an upturn of global carbon emission (5 Tg C year−1, 0.3% year−1) occurs in the recent decadal period (2008–2022) due to intensified boreal forest fires. The burned area decouples from carbon emission in terms of the changing tendency, as exhibited by the decreasing global burned area after 2008. Regionally, the fire carbon emission enhancement over the past 15 years (2008–2022) mainly comes from the boreal forests in northwestern North America, northeastern Siberia, and parts of the savanna area, all of which coincide with local climate change toward higher fire proneness. This study reveals a climate-driven aggravation of the BB carbon emission, especially in high-latitude boreal forests, and calls for attention to its potential impacts and effective fire management strategies.
生物质燃烧(BB)作为一种重要的大气碳源,对环境和气候有着重大影响。近年来频发的生物质燃烧极端事件引起了广泛关注,但人们对全球范围内生物质燃烧碳排放的最新变化还不完全了解。在此,我们基于全球小型火灾排放数据库(GFED4s)数据集,按火灾类型和不同尺度系统地量化了1999-2022年BB碳排放的变化。我们发现,热带稀树草原和北方森林火灾在研究期间的持续趋势形成了鲜明对比,影响了全球生物圈碳排放总量的变化。1999-2022年,热带稀树草原火灾的减弱导致全球生物圈碳排放量下降,为-8 Tg C year-1(-0.4% year-1),而最近十年(2008-2022年),由于北方森林火灾的加剧,全球碳排放量回升(5 Tg C year-1,0.3% year-1)。从变化趋势来看,燃烧面积与碳排放量脱钩,2008 年后全球燃烧面积不断减少。从地区来看,过去 15 年(2008-2022 年)火灾碳排放量的增加主要来自北美西北部的北方森林、西伯利亚东北部以及热带草原的部分地区,这些地区都与当地气候向更易发生火灾的方向变化相吻合。这项研究揭示了气候驱动的 BB 碳排放加剧,尤其是在高纬度北方森林,并呼吁关注其潜在影响和有效的火灾管理策略。
{"title":"Contrasting trends of carbon emission from savanna and boreal forest fires during 1999–2022","authors":"Yunfan Liu, Aijun Ding","doi":"10.1002/met.2177","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/met.2177","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Biomass burning (BB) as an important atmospheric carbon source has significant environmental and climatic influence. The frequent extreme BB cases in recent years have raised extensive concerns, yet the latest changes in BB emission on a global scale are not fully understood. Here, we systematically quantify the changes in BB carbon emission for 1999–2022 by fire types and on different scales based on the Global Fire Emissions Database with small fires (GFED4s) dataset. We find contrasting trends of savanna and boreal forest fires persistent over the study period, shaping the variation of global total BB carbon emission. The receding savanna fire drives a declining global BB carbon emission at −8 Tg C year<sup>−1</sup> (−0.4% year<sup>−1</sup>) for 1999–2022, while an upturn of global carbon emission (5 Tg C year<sup>−1</sup>, 0.3% year<sup>−1</sup>) occurs in the recent decadal period (2008–2022) due to intensified boreal forest fires. The burned area decouples from carbon emission in terms of the changing tendency, as exhibited by the decreasing global burned area after 2008. Regionally, the fire carbon emission enhancement over the past 15 years (2008–2022) mainly comes from the boreal forests in northwestern North America, northeastern Siberia, and parts of the savanna area, all of which coincide with local climate change toward higher fire proneness. This study reveals a climate-driven aggravation of the BB carbon emission, especially in high-latitude boreal forests, and calls for attention to its potential impacts and effective fire management strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":49825,"journal":{"name":"Meteorological Applications","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2024-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/met.2177","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139744962","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Recurving tropical cyclones (TCs) can sometimes produce tornado outbreaks, while some TCs with similar tracks and intensities may produce none of tornado, which makes it challenging to assess tornado risk within recurving TCs. This study investigates two recurving TCs, Typhoon Yagi (2018) and Typhoon In-Fa (2021), that made landfall in eastern China. Despite the similar recurving tracks and intensities, Yagi produced 11 tornadoes while In-Fa produced none. Results show that both TCs were characterized by similar large-scale conditions that were dynamically favourable for tornadoes during the recurvature process. The non-tornadic In-Fa even featured a higher shear and helicity environment in its northeast sector than did the tornado-productive Yagi. The greatest difference between Yagi and In-Fa is the thermodynamic instability owing to the different lower–middle-tropospheric lapse rates that are attributable to the differences in air trajectories at low levels. In-Fa featured marginal instability due to the cooler air at low levels because almost all of the air parcels came from the Pacific Ocean while most air parcels for Yagi came from the warm land. The cooler low-level air tends to create higher relative humidity in In-Fa's interior and thus leads to widespread precipitation which in turn also contributes to the low-level cooling. The different air trajectories are demonstrated related to the TC's translation speed, size and synoptic characteristics days before TC's landfall. Numerical simulations suggest that the upward motions within the widespread precipitation regions of In-Fa are overall weaker than those of Yagi due to the limited instability in the former. These findings suggest that even though two TCs were characterized by similar tracks, intensities and large-scale forcings, their different low-level air pathways may have significant influence on priming the mesoscale environment for supercell or tornado formation.
{"title":"Environmental ingredients that lead to tornado outbreak and tornado failure: A comparison between two similar recurving tropical cyclones","authors":"Zhaoming Li, Lanqiang Bai, Hongxing Chu, Xianxiang Huang","doi":"10.1002/met.2175","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/met.2175","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Recurving tropical cyclones (TCs) can sometimes produce tornado outbreaks, while some TCs with similar tracks and intensities may produce none of tornado, which makes it challenging to assess tornado risk within recurving TCs. This study investigates two recurving TCs, Typhoon Yagi (2018) and Typhoon In-Fa (2021), that made landfall in eastern China. Despite the similar recurving tracks and intensities, Yagi produced 11 tornadoes while In-Fa produced none. Results show that both TCs were characterized by similar large-scale conditions that were dynamically favourable for tornadoes during the recurvature process. The non-tornadic In-Fa even featured a higher shear and helicity environment in its northeast sector than did the tornado-productive Yagi. The greatest difference between Yagi and In-Fa is the thermodynamic instability owing to the different lower–middle-tropospheric lapse rates that are attributable to the differences in air trajectories at low levels. In-Fa featured marginal instability due to the cooler air at low levels because almost all of the air parcels came from the Pacific Ocean while most air parcels for Yagi came from the warm land. The cooler low-level air tends to create higher relative humidity in In-Fa's interior and thus leads to widespread precipitation which in turn also contributes to the low-level cooling. The different air trajectories are demonstrated related to the TC's translation speed, size and synoptic characteristics days before TC's landfall. Numerical simulations suggest that the upward motions within the widespread precipitation regions of In-Fa are overall weaker than those of Yagi due to the limited instability in the former. These findings suggest that even though two TCs were characterized by similar tracks, intensities and large-scale forcings, their different low-level air pathways may have significant influence on priming the mesoscale environment for supercell or tornado formation.</p>","PeriodicalId":49825,"journal":{"name":"Meteorological Applications","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2024-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/met.2175","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139720136","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}