Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand最新文献

The majority of children and young people in Aotearoa New Zealand (NZ) experience good health and wellbeing, but there are key areas where they compare unfavourably to those in other rich countries. However, current measures of wellbeing are critically limited in their suitability to reflect the dynamic, culture-bound, and subjective nature of the concept of 'wellbeing'. In particular, there is a lack of measurement in primary school-aged children and in ways that incorporate Māori perspectives on wellbeing. A Better Start National Science Challenge work in the areas of Big Data, Healthy Weight, Resilient Teens, and Successful learning demonstrates how research is increasing our understanding of, and our ability to enhance, wellbeing for NZ children. As we look ahead to the future, opportunities to support the wellbeing of NZ young people will be shaped by how we embrace and mitigate against potential harms of new technologies, and our ability to respond to new challenges that arise due to climate change. In order to avoid increasing inequity in who experiences wellbeing in NZ, wellbeing must be monitored in ways that are culturally acceptable, universal, and recognise what makes children flourish.

There is increasing support, in international legal theory and advocacy, for water governance approaches that go beyond the technocratic, and recognise the reciprocal relatedness of water peoples and water places. Such an approach may seem logical within certain Indigenous law and belief systems, but can Western legal frameworks become more 'relational'? How can they evolve to be capable of meaningfully relating with Indigenous systems of law and governance for water? This article draws on a comprehensive survey of comparative legal developments affecting water across seven settler-colonial countries in Australasia and Latin America that attempt (or profess) to be relational. I critically evaluate these attempts against the 'yardstick' of relationality. In each jurisdiction there are unresolved calls for a social, cultural and constitutional transformation of some sort, in which Indigenous and environmental justice are key. The analysis here reveals the potential for constitutional law to drive relational water laws, although without place-based specificity and supporting institutions, resources and redistributions of power, constitutional approaches risk having little practical impact.

This article presents a community-led kaupapa Māori research project involving Whakatōhea and neighbouring rohe (areas). This project arose from a moemoeā (dream or vision) of Tawhai, a stroke survivor who wanted to help fellow stroke survivors. We began with a survey of stroke survivors, community members and service providers in Ōpōtiki and surrounding areas, investigating community knowledge of stroke, barriers and facilitators to recovery, and the availability and appropriateness of health services for stroke survivors in the area. The ultimate aim was to facilitate Māori stroke survivors and whānau (family) to support recent stroke survivors, and find funding to allow sustainable employment of stroke survivors in this capacity. Survey results depicted an isolated community with very poor knowledge of stroke and little access to stroke services. However, they also revealed a community that is determined to look after their own, improve outcomes, and has the support of local health and social service providers. Community-based discussions on the survey results resulted in a vision for He Whare Oranga Tonutanga - a place where Māori stroke survivors and whānau could come to contribute what they can and take what they need. Māori stroke survivors could be employed to provide mentoring and run the centre.

Insufficient water for irrigation is a common problem in the Canterbury Region of New Zealand. Farmers have the option of applying for resource consent or joining a community irrigation scheme to take water. Water supply becomes more problematic during drought seasons as farmers must adhere to water restrictions imposed by the water authority. To deal with this problem, we developed an agent-based irrigation management system that can be used by farmers to calculate the ideal crop water needs on individual farms, which is particularly useful during periods of water scarcity. During water scarcity, most farms will have shortages of water. However, it is possible that there are farmers who will have excess water that could be distributed to those who need it. By doing this, farmers with excess water can make more profit and those who do not have enough water can purchase water to reduce their losses. In this work, we explore how auction-based negotiation in a multi-agent setting can be used to maximise water sharing within a community during periods of water scarcity. We evaluate various auction mechanisms that can be used to distribute excess water. In addition, we investigate the effect of various different agents' behaviours on water distribution and community profit.

ABSTRACT

The judiciary has historically been conservative in its use of Artificial Intelligence, but recent advances in machine learning have prompted scholars to reconsider such use in tasks like sentence prediction. This paper investigates by experimentation the potential use of explainable artificial intelligence for predicting imprisonment sentences in assault cases in New Zealand’s courts. We propose a proof-of-concept explainable model and verify in practice that it is fit for purpose, with predicted sentences accurate to within one year. We further analyse the model to understand the most influential phrases in sentence length prediction. We conclude the paper with an evaluative discussion of the future benefits and risks of different ways of using such an AI model in New Zealand’s courts.