Pub Date : 2023-10-15DOI: 10.22373/petita.v8i2.196
Iman Jauhari, Azhari Yahya, Darmawan Darmawan, Dahlan Dahlan, Muhammad Nasir
The purpose of this study is to scrutinize the legal analysis of unregistered marriage, to identify the factors that cause unregistered marriages, and to analyze the views of ulama about unregistered marriage in Aceh. The method used in this research is an empirical juridical method with a qualitative approach. This research was conducted in Aceh and data collection was carried out by means of field research supported by library research. The results show that marriage registration has been regulated in the Marriage Law and in the Islamic Compilation Law as well as a set of implementing regulations in the field of marriage registration. The factors that cause unregistered marriage in Aceh among others are economic factors, illegal pregnancy, lack of understanding and awareness about marriage law, prolonged affairs, not having a guardian, avoiding administrative procedures, and avoiding adultery. The Acehnese Ulama say that generally, they accept marriage registration because it has benefits for the family such as registration of children's birth certificates, and family cards as administrative requirements in other legal acts. However, they refuse to register the marriage if it is related to other provisions such as the age of marriage, polygamy permits, and disputes involving the family.
{"title":"LEGAL ANALYSIS OF UNREGISTERED MARRIAGE VIEWED FROM ULAMA’S PERSPECTIVE IN ACEH PROVINCE","authors":"Iman Jauhari, Azhari Yahya, Darmawan Darmawan, Dahlan Dahlan, Muhammad Nasir","doi":"10.22373/petita.v8i2.196","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.22373/petita.v8i2.196","url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study is to scrutinize the legal analysis of unregistered marriage, to identify the factors that cause unregistered marriages, and to analyze the views of ulama about unregistered marriage in Aceh. The method used in this research is an empirical juridical method with a qualitative approach. This research was conducted in Aceh and data collection was carried out by means of field research supported by library research. The results show that marriage registration has been regulated in the Marriage Law and in the Islamic Compilation Law as well as a set of implementing regulations in the field of marriage registration. The factors that cause unregistered marriage in Aceh among others are economic factors, illegal pregnancy, lack of understanding and awareness about marriage law, prolonged affairs, not having a guardian, avoiding administrative procedures, and avoiding adultery. The Acehnese Ulama say that generally, they accept marriage registration because it has benefits for the family such as registration of children's birth certificates, and family cards as administrative requirements in other legal acts. However, they refuse to register the marriage if it is related to other provisions such as the age of marriage, polygamy permits, and disputes involving the family.","PeriodicalId":500566,"journal":{"name":"Petita : jurnal kajian ilmu hukum dan syariah","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"136185064","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-10-15DOI: 10.22373/petita.v8i2.220
Tanto Lailam, Putri Anggia, Nita Andrianti
The research focused on the proportionality analysis (proportionality principle) as a Legal Reasoning Method to decide competing rights caseS in the German Federal Constitutional Court (GFCC) or Bundesverfassungsgericht. It is the ultimate rule of law, global constitutionalism value, and the benchmark for constitutional judges to review conflicts between individual rights and state interests. Hence, an analysis model for measuring conflicts of competence between the European Union and Germany. It is four stage assessment analysis: legitimate aims, suitable, necessary, and balancing (strict sense). The result of the research saw that it is used as a constitutional reasoning model in landmark decision cases in 2020-2022, namely: the European Central Bank asset case, the climate change case, the Election of a Vice-President of the Bundestag case, and the Bavarian Constitution Protection Act case. Based on these case reviews, it is well applied, systemised, structured, and comprehensive in each case. However, not all stages are used in competing rights analysis, especially the balancing test as the last analysis in proportionality.
{"title":"THE GERMAN FEDERAL CONSTITUTIONAL COURT APPROACHES PROPORTIONALITY ANALYSIS AS A LEGAL REASONING METHOD TO DECIDE INVOLVING COMPETING RIGHTS CASES","authors":"Tanto Lailam, Putri Anggia, Nita Andrianti","doi":"10.22373/petita.v8i2.220","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.22373/petita.v8i2.220","url":null,"abstract":"The research focused on the proportionality analysis (proportionality principle) as a Legal Reasoning Method to decide competing rights caseS in the German Federal Constitutional Court (GFCC) or Bundesverfassungsgericht. It is the ultimate rule of law, global constitutionalism value, and the benchmark for constitutional judges to review conflicts between individual rights and state interests. Hence, an analysis model for measuring conflicts of competence between the European Union and Germany. It is four stage assessment analysis: legitimate aims, suitable, necessary, and balancing (strict sense). The result of the research saw that it is used as a constitutional reasoning model in landmark decision cases in 2020-2022, namely: the European Central Bank asset case, the climate change case, the Election of a Vice-President of the Bundestag case, and the Bavarian Constitution Protection Act case. Based on these case reviews, it is well applied, systemised, structured, and comprehensive in each case. However, not all stages are used in competing rights analysis, especially the balancing test as the last analysis in proportionality.","PeriodicalId":500566,"journal":{"name":"Petita : jurnal kajian ilmu hukum dan syariah","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"136185236","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-10-15DOI: 10.22373/petita.v8i2.227
Asri Wijayanti
The status of stevedoring labor legal relations is still debated among labor law experts. As a permanent worker, outsourcer, day laborer, or no employment relationship. This study aims to analyze the status of the legal relationship between stevedoring workers and the legal consequences, along with legal remedies that can be taken by stevedoring workers, if they have not received maximum rights. This legal research uses a statutory and case approach. The results of the study after analysis of the substance and procedure are the status of legal relations of stevedoring labor, more precisely as daily workers, and as members of cooperatives. The legal consequence of the employment relationship status of stevedoring workers with cooperatives is the right to share the remaining operating results, at the end of the year. The legal consequence of the loading and unloading labor service work is wages based on daily time units. There is no right to severance pay, service award money, and reimbursement money, because it is not stipulated in the Cooperative Annual Member Meeting. Legal remedies that can be taken by stevedoring workers if they do not get their rights can file a default lawsuit in the local District Court. The recommendation given is that cooperatives can establish additional rights for bonfire loading workers, such as rights that should obtain permanent employment, through the annual meeting of cooperative members.
{"title":"THE LEGAL RELATIONSHIP STATUS OF LOADING AND UNLOADING AFTER THE JOB CREATION LAW","authors":"Asri Wijayanti","doi":"10.22373/petita.v8i2.227","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.22373/petita.v8i2.227","url":null,"abstract":"The status of stevedoring labor legal relations is still debated among labor law experts. As a permanent worker, outsourcer, day laborer, or no employment relationship. This study aims to analyze the status of the legal relationship between stevedoring workers and the legal consequences, along with legal remedies that can be taken by stevedoring workers, if they have not received maximum rights. This legal research uses a statutory and case approach. The results of the study after analysis of the substance and procedure are the status of legal relations of stevedoring labor, more precisely as daily workers, and as members of cooperatives. The legal consequence of the employment relationship status of stevedoring workers with cooperatives is the right to share the remaining operating results, at the end of the year. The legal consequence of the loading and unloading labor service work is wages based on daily time units. There is no right to severance pay, service award money, and reimbursement money, because it is not stipulated in the Cooperative Annual Member Meeting. Legal remedies that can be taken by stevedoring workers if they do not get their rights can file a default lawsuit in the local District Court. The recommendation given is that cooperatives can establish additional rights for bonfire loading workers, such as rights that should obtain permanent employment, through the annual meeting of cooperative members.
 
","PeriodicalId":500566,"journal":{"name":"Petita : jurnal kajian ilmu hukum dan syariah","volume":"75 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"136185379","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-10-08DOI: 10.22373/petita.v8i2.200
Muhammad Mutawalli, None Maskun, Zainal Amin Ayub, Muhammad Saleh Tajuddin, Harlida Abdul Wahab
This study aims to analyze the constitutionality of legislative general elections with a review of the closed proportional system in the 1945 Constitution. The legislative election system is an important tool for maintaining democratic principles and fair representation in a country. The constitutionality of the closed proportional system has been the subject of ongoing debate. This study uses a qualitative approach with normative juridical methods to analyze the constitutionality of general legislative elections that use a closed proportional system. This approach involved collecting data from legal documents, literature studies, and court decisions that were relevant to this topic. The results of the study showed that the application of a closed proportional system in legislative general elections has several constitutional implications, such as the limitation of political access for individuals outside of political parties, which can be considered as a violation of the individual's constitutional right to participate in the political process. This research also showed that a closed proportional system can provide greater political stability and strengthen the role of political parties in the political system. This study also analyzed the implications of implementing an open proportional system in legislative general elections.
Abstrak: Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji konstitusionalitas pemilihan umum legislatif dengan tinjauan terhadap sistem proporsional tertutup dalam UUD 1945. Sistem pemilihan umum legislatif adalah aspek penting dalam menjaga prinsip demokrasi dan keterwakilan yang adil dalam sebuah negara. Sistem proporsional tertutup telah menjadi subjek perdebatan yang berkelanjutan mengenai konstitusionalitasnya dalam konteks UUD 1945. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif dengan metode yuridis normatif untuk menganalisis konstitusionalitas pemilihan umum legislatif dengan menggunakan sistem proporsional tertutup. Pendekatan ini melibatkan pengumpulan data dari dokumen hukum, studi literatur, dan putusan pengadilan yang relevan dengan topik ini. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa penerapan sistem proporsional tertutup dalam pemilihan umum legislatif memiliki beberapa implikasi konstitusional. Pertama, sistem ini dapat membatasi akses politik bagi individu di luar partai politik, yang dapat dianggap sebagai pelanggaran terhadap hak konstitusional individu untuk berpartisipasi dalam proses politik. Penelitian ini juga menganalisis implikasi penerapan sistem proporsional terbuka dalam pemilihan umum legislatif. Penelitian ini juga menunjukkan bahwa sistem proporsional tertutup dapat memberikan stabilitas politik yang lebih besar dan memperkuat peran partai politik dalam sistem politik.
Kata Kunci: Konstitusionalitas, Pemilihan Umum Legislatif, Sistem Proporsional Tertutup, UUD 1945, Kebebasan Politik
本文旨在通过对1945年《宪法》中封闭比例制度的考察，分析立法选举的合宪性。立法选举制度是维护国家民主原则和公平代表制的重要工具。封闭比例制度的合宪性一直是持续辩论的主题。本研究采用定性方法与规范的司法方法，分析采用封闭比例制的普选的合宪性。这种方法包括从与本主题相关的法律文件、文献研究和法院判决中收集数据。研究结果表明，在立法普选中采用封闭比例制度会产生若干宪法影响，例如限制政党以外的个人参政，这可被视为侵犯了个人参与政治进程的宪法权利。该研究还表明，封闭的比例制度可以提供更大的政治稳定性，并加强政党在政治制度中的作用。本研究还分析了在立法机构普选中实施开放式比例制度的影响。
[摘要]自1945年以来，我国立法制度一直是我国立法体制的重要组成部分。全国人大常委会主席潘伟迪在讲话中说，民主主席潘伟迪在讲话中说，民主主席潘伟迪在讲话中说，民主主席潘伟迪在讲话中说。系统的比例结构和结构，以及结构和结构，以及结构和结构，以及结构和结构。penpentian ini mongunakan penpenkan是一种质量管理方法，是一种规范管理方法，是一种宪政管理方法，是一种立法管理方法，是一种孟古纳罕制度比例管理方法。Pendekatan ini melibatkan pengpulan data dari dokumen hukum, study literature, danputusan pengadian yang相关的dunan topic。国会议员的立法是立法的，国会议员的立法是宪法的，国会议员的立法是宪法。Pertama, system ini patat mematasi akses politik bagi individual di partitek politics, yang dapat dianggap sebagai pelanggaran terhadap hak constitutional individual untuk berpartisipasi dalam prostk politics。penpenelitian的翻译结果:penpenelitian的翻译结果:penpenelitian的翻译结果:penpenelitian的翻译结果:Penelitian ini juga menunjukkan bahwa制度比例结构;成员稳定政治;yang lebih besar;Kata Kunci:《宪制论》，《国家立法》，《制度比例论》，1945年，《中国政治》
{"title":"LEGISLATIVE ELECTIONS: AN OVERVIEW OF CLOSED PROPORTIONAL SYSTEM","authors":"Muhammad Mutawalli, None Maskun, Zainal Amin Ayub, Muhammad Saleh Tajuddin, Harlida Abdul Wahab","doi":"10.22373/petita.v8i2.200","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.22373/petita.v8i2.200","url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to analyze the constitutionality of legislative general elections with a review of the closed proportional system in the 1945 Constitution. The legislative election system is an important tool for maintaining democratic principles and fair representation in a country. The constitutionality of the closed proportional system has been the subject of ongoing debate. This study uses a qualitative approach with normative juridical methods to analyze the constitutionality of general legislative elections that use a closed proportional system. This approach involved collecting data from legal documents, literature studies, and court decisions that were relevant to this topic. The results of the study showed that the application of a closed proportional system in legislative general elections has several constitutional implications, such as the limitation of political access for individuals outside of political parties, which can be considered as a violation of the individual's constitutional right to participate in the political process. This research also showed that a closed proportional system can provide greater political stability and strengthen the role of political parties in the political system. This study also analyzed the implications of implementing an open proportional system in legislative general elections.
 Abstrak: Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji konstitusionalitas pemilihan umum legislatif dengan tinjauan terhadap sistem proporsional tertutup dalam UUD 1945. Sistem pemilihan umum legislatif adalah aspek penting dalam menjaga prinsip demokrasi dan keterwakilan yang adil dalam sebuah negara. Sistem proporsional tertutup telah menjadi subjek perdebatan yang berkelanjutan mengenai konstitusionalitasnya dalam konteks UUD 1945. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif dengan metode yuridis normatif untuk menganalisis konstitusionalitas pemilihan umum legislatif dengan menggunakan sistem proporsional tertutup. Pendekatan ini melibatkan pengumpulan data dari dokumen hukum, studi literatur, dan putusan pengadilan yang relevan dengan topik ini. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa penerapan sistem proporsional tertutup dalam pemilihan umum legislatif memiliki beberapa implikasi konstitusional. Pertama, sistem ini dapat membatasi akses politik bagi individu di luar partai politik, yang dapat dianggap sebagai pelanggaran terhadap hak konstitusional individu untuk berpartisipasi dalam proses politik. Penelitian ini juga menganalisis implikasi penerapan sistem proporsional terbuka dalam pemilihan umum legislatif. Penelitian ini juga menunjukkan bahwa sistem proporsional tertutup dapat memberikan stabilitas politik yang lebih besar dan memperkuat peran partai politik dalam sistem politik.
 Kata Kunci: Konstitusionalitas, Pemilihan Umum Legislatif, Sistem Proporsional Tertutup, UUD 1945, Kebebasan Politik","PeriodicalId":500566,"journal":{"name":"Petita : jurnal kajian ilmu hukum dan syariah","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135251814","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：