首页 > 最新文献

Journal of Rural Health最新文献

英文 中文
Cognitive impairment and limited health literacy are associated with poor health outcomes among patients with heart failure residing in rural areas
IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Pub Date : 2025-01-23 DOI: 10.1111/jrh.12919
Jia-Rong Wu PhD, RN, FAAN, FAHA, Chin-Yen Lin PhD, RN, JungHee Kang PhD, MPH, RN, Debra K. Moser PhD, RN, FAAN, FAHA

Background

Cognitive impairment and limited health literacy are prevalent among patients with heart failure, particularly those residing in rural areas, and are linked to poor health outcomes. Little is known about the intricate relationships among cognitive function, health literacy, and rehospitalization and death in rural patients with heart failure.

Objectives

To determine the relationships among cognitive function, health literacy, and cardiac event-free survival (ie, heart failure hospitalizations and cardiac mortality) in rural patients with heart failure.

Methods

This was a secondary data analysis of a randomized controlled trial of 573 rural patients with heart failure. Cognitive function was measured using the Mini-Cog test. Health literacy was measured by the Short Test of Functional Health Literacy in Adults. Cardiac event-free survival was followed for 2 years. Survival analyses (ie, Kaplan-Meier plots with log-rank test and Cox regression) were used.

Results

Cognitive impairment was associated with limited health literacy. Cognitive impairment and limited health literacy predicted worse cardiac event-free survival (P<.05). Patients with both cognitive impairment and limited health literacy had a 2.24 times higher risk of experiencing a cardiac event compared to those without cognitive impairment and with adequate health literacy (P<.001).

Conclusions

Patients with cognitive impairment and limited health literacy were at the highest risk of experiencing a cardiac event. It is important to screen rural patients with heart failure for cognitive impairment and limited health literacy. Interventions to improve outcomes need to be developed to target rural patients who have heart failure with cognitive impairment and limited health literacy.

背景:心力衰竭患者,尤其是居住在农村地区的心力衰竭患者普遍存在认知功能障碍和健康素养有限的问题,这与不良的健康后果有关。人们对农村心衰患者的认知功能、健康素养、再住院和死亡之间错综复杂的关系知之甚少:确定农村心衰患者的认知功能、健康素养和无心脏事件生存(即心衰住院和心脏死亡)之间的关系:这是一项对 573 名农村心衰患者进行的随机对照试验的二次数据分析。认知功能通过迷你慢动作测试(Mini-Cog test)进行测量。健康素养通过 "成人功能性健康素养简短测试 "进行测量。无心脏事件生存期为 2 年。采用生存分析(即带有对数秩检验和 Cox 回归的 Kaplan-Meier 图):结果:认知障碍与健康素养有限有关。认知障碍和健康知识水平有限预示着无心脏事件生存率(PConclusions:认知障碍和健康知识水平有限的患者发生心脏事件的风险最高。对农村心力衰竭患者进行认知障碍和健康知识不足筛查非常重要。需要针对认知障碍和健康知识水平有限的农村心衰患者制定干预措施,以改善预后。
{"title":"Cognitive impairment and limited health literacy are associated with poor health outcomes among patients with heart failure residing in rural areas","authors":"Jia-Rong Wu PhD, RN, FAAN, FAHA,&nbsp;Chin-Yen Lin PhD, RN,&nbsp;JungHee Kang PhD, MPH, RN,&nbsp;Debra K. Moser PhD, RN, FAAN, FAHA","doi":"10.1111/jrh.12919","DOIUrl":"10.1111/jrh.12919","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Background</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Cognitive impairment and limited health literacy are prevalent among patients with heart failure, particularly those residing in rural areas, and are linked to poor health outcomes. Little is known about the intricate relationships among cognitive function, health literacy, and rehospitalization and death in rural patients with heart failure.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Objectives</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>To determine the relationships among cognitive function, health literacy, and cardiac event-free survival (ie, heart failure hospitalizations and cardiac mortality) in rural patients with heart failure.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>This was a secondary data analysis of a randomized controlled trial of 573 rural patients with heart failure. Cognitive function was measured using the Mini-Cog test. Health literacy was measured by the Short Test of Functional Health Literacy in Adults. Cardiac event-free survival was followed for 2 years. Survival analyses (ie, Kaplan-Meier plots with log-rank test and Cox regression) were used.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Cognitive impairment was associated with limited health literacy. Cognitive impairment and limited health literacy predicted worse cardiac event-free survival (<i>P</i>&lt;.05). Patients with both cognitive impairment and limited health literacy had a 2.24 times higher risk of experiencing a cardiac event compared to those without cognitive impairment and with adequate health literacy (<i>P</i>&lt;.001).</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusions</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Patients with cognitive impairment and limited health literacy were at the highest risk of experiencing a cardiac event. It is important to screen rural patients with heart failure for cognitive impairment and limited health literacy. Interventions to improve outcomes need to be developed to target rural patients who have heart failure with cognitive impairment and limited health literacy.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":50060,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rural Health","volume":"41 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2025-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143034750","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Alzheimer's disease and related dementias among Medicare beneficiaries aged ≥ 65 years in rural America, by Census region and select demographic characteristics: 2020 美国农村≥65岁医疗保险受益人的阿尔茨海默病和相关痴呆,按人口普查地区和选择人口特征:2020
IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Pub Date : 2025-01-22 DOI: 10.1111/jrh.12902
Kevin A. Matthews PhD, Christian T. Murray MSc, Brenda L. Nguyen MPH, Katie S. Spears MPH, Eva M. J. Jackson MPH, Diane M. Hall PhD, Lisa C. McGuire PhD

Purpose

Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD) are a significant public health concern characterized by memory decline that, over time, leads to loss of independence. This study reports ADRD diagnosis rates among Medicare beneficiaries aged ≥ 65 years in rural America.

Methods

We conducted a descriptive analysis of Medicare Fee-for-Service (FFS) and Medicare Advantage enrollees using administrative Medicare data from 2020. Combining data from Medicare FFS and Medicare Advantage produces a more complete and representative sample of older adults than previous studies that used FFS data alone. Nonmetropolitan counties were used to define rural. Rural ADRD diagnosis rates, stratified by age, sex, race/ethnicity, and Census region, were adjusted using the 2000 Census population standard.

Findings

The study population consisted of 54 million Medicare data Fee-for-Service (FFS) and Medicare Advantage enrollees aged ≥ 65; 5.3 million beneficiaries were diagnosed with ADRD, and 16.2% (n = 861,337) of beneficiaries diagnosed with ADRD resided in rural America. The age-adjusted ADRD diagnosis rate was slightly lower in rural America (9.6 per 100 beneficiaries) than in the United States (10.0 per 100 beneficiaries). The South Census region had the highest rural ADRD diagnosis rates.

Conclusion

These findings underscore the need for targeted interventions and support mechanisms to address the growing burden of ADRD in rural communities.

目的:阿尔茨海默病和相关痴呆(ADRD)是一个重要的公共卫生问题,其特征是记忆衰退,随着时间的推移,导致独立性丧失。本研究报告了美国农村年龄≥65岁的医疗保险受益人的ADRD诊断率。方法:我们使用2020年以来的医疗保险行政数据对医疗保险按服务收费(FFS)和医疗保险优势(Medicare Advantage)参保人进行了描述性分析。与以前单独使用FFS数据的研究相比,将Medicare FFS和Medicare Advantage的数据结合起来,可以产生更完整、更有代表性的老年人样本。非大都市县被用来定义农村。按年龄、性别、种族/民族和普查地区分层的农村ADRD诊出率采用2000年普查人口标准进行调整。结果:研究人群包括5400万年龄≥65岁的医疗保险数据按服务收费(FFS)和医疗保险优势(Medicare Advantage)参保人;530万受益人被诊断为ADRD,其中16.2% (n = 861,337)的受益人居住在美国农村。美国农村地区经年龄调整的ADRD诊断率(每100名受益人9.6例)略低于美国(每100名受益人10.0例)。南方人口普查区农村ADRD诊断率最高。结论:这些发现强调需要有针对性的干预措施和支持机制来解决农村社区日益增长的ADRD负担。
{"title":"Alzheimer's disease and related dementias among Medicare beneficiaries aged ≥ 65 years in rural America, by Census region and select demographic characteristics: 2020","authors":"Kevin A. Matthews PhD,&nbsp;Christian T. Murray MSc,&nbsp;Brenda L. Nguyen MPH,&nbsp;Katie S. Spears MPH,&nbsp;Eva M. J. Jackson MPH,&nbsp;Diane M. Hall PhD,&nbsp;Lisa C. McGuire PhD","doi":"10.1111/jrh.12902","DOIUrl":"10.1111/jrh.12902","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Purpose</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD) are a significant public health concern characterized by memory decline that, over time, leads to loss of independence. This study reports ADRD diagnosis rates among Medicare beneficiaries aged ≥ 65 years in rural America.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>We conducted a descriptive analysis of Medicare Fee-for-Service (FFS) and Medicare Advantage enrollees using administrative Medicare data from 2020. Combining data from Medicare FFS and Medicare Advantage produces a more complete and representative sample of older adults than previous studies that used FFS data alone. Nonmetropolitan counties were used to define rural. Rural ADRD diagnosis rates, stratified by age, sex, race/ethnicity, and Census region, were adjusted using the 2000 Census population standard.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Findings</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>The study population consisted of 54 million Medicare data Fee-for-Service (FFS) and Medicare Advantage enrollees aged ≥ 65; 5.3 million beneficiaries were diagnosed with ADRD, and 16.2% (<i>n</i> = 861,337) of beneficiaries diagnosed with ADRD resided in rural America. The age-adjusted ADRD diagnosis rate was slightly lower in rural America (9.6 per 100 beneficiaries) than in the United States (10.0 per 100 beneficiaries). The South Census region had the highest rural ADRD diagnosis rates.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusion</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>These findings underscore the need for targeted interventions and support mechanisms to address the growing burden of ADRD in rural communities.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":50060,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rural Health","volume":"41 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2025-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143015107","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The influence of rurality on self-reported physical therapy utilization among patients with severe chronic back pain in the United States 美国乡村生活对重度慢性背痛患者自我报告的物理治疗利用的影响
IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Pub Date : 2025-01-21 DOI: 10.1111/jrh.12923
Kevin H. McLaughlin PT, DPT

Purpose

To examine the association of rurality and physical therapy utilization among a nationally representative sample of individuals with severe chronic back pain.

Methods

This study utilized a publicly available dataset from the 2019 National Health Information Survey (Adult Sample). Individuals with severe chronic back pain were identified based on survey items examining respondents’ pain frequency and location. Physical therapy utilization was identified based on survey questions asking about pain management strategies utilized over the previous 3 months. Rurality was classified as large central metro, large fringe metro, medium and small metro, and nonmetropolitan/rural, based on the county of residence. Regression was used to examine the association between rurality and physical therapy utilization, while controlling for relevant covariates. National estimates were calculated using provided weighting variables.

Results

We identified 2925 individuals (weighted = 20,468,134) meeting the criteria for severe chronic back pain. We observed that individuals with severe chronic back pain living in nonmetropolitan/rural areas had 34% lower odds of (weighted OR: 0.66, 95% CI: 0.47, 0.92) utilizing physical therapy compared to individuals living in large central metropolitan areas. We did not observe significant differences in the odds of utilizing physical therapy among individuals living in large fringe metropolitan areas or medium–small metropolitan areas.

Conclusions

Individuals living in rural parts of the United States have lower odds of using physical therapy for management of their severe chronic back pain. Additional research is needed to examine the factors that contribute to these differences and improve access to care.

目的:在全国具有代表性的重度慢性背痛患者样本中,研究乡村性与物理治疗使用的关系。方法:本研究利用了2019年全国健康信息调查(成人样本)的公开数据集。根据调查对象疼痛频率和部位的调查项目,确定患有严重慢性背痛的个体。通过询问患者在过去3个月内使用的疼痛管理策略的调查问题来确定物理治疗的使用情况。农村地区根据居住的县分为大型中心地铁、大型边缘地铁、中小地铁和非大都市/农村。在控制相关协变量的同时,采用回归来检验乡村性与物理治疗利用之间的关系。使用提供的加权变量计算国家估计数。结果:我们确定了2925人(加权= 20,468,134)符合严重慢性背痛的标准。我们观察到,与生活在大城市中心地区的患者相比,生活在非大都市/农村地区的重度慢性背痛患者使用物理治疗的几率(加权OR: 0.66, 95% CI: 0.47, 0.92)低34%。我们没有观察到生活在大城市边缘地区和中小城市地区的个体使用物理治疗的几率有显著差异。结论:生活在美国农村地区的个体使用物理疗法治疗严重慢性背痛的几率较低。需要进一步的研究来检查造成这些差异的因素,并改善获得护理的机会。
{"title":"The influence of rurality on self-reported physical therapy utilization among patients with severe chronic back pain in the United States","authors":"Kevin H. McLaughlin PT, DPT","doi":"10.1111/jrh.12923","DOIUrl":"10.1111/jrh.12923","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Purpose</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>To examine the association of rurality and physical therapy utilization among a nationally representative sample of individuals with severe chronic back pain.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>This study utilized a publicly available dataset from the 2019 National Health Information Survey (Adult Sample). Individuals with severe chronic back pain were identified based on survey items examining respondents’ pain frequency and location. Physical therapy utilization was identified based on survey questions asking about pain management strategies utilized over the previous 3 months. Rurality was classified as <i>large central metro</i>, <i>large fringe metro</i>, <i>medium and small metro</i>, and <i>nonmetropolitan/rural</i>, based on the county of residence. Regression was used to examine the association between rurality and physical therapy utilization, while controlling for relevant covariates. National estimates were calculated using provided weighting variables.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>We identified 2925 individuals (weighted = 20,468,134) meeting the criteria for severe chronic back pain. We observed that individuals with severe chronic back pain living in nonmetropolitan/rural areas had 34% lower odds of (weighted OR: 0.66, 95% CI: 0.47, 0.92) utilizing physical therapy compared to individuals living in large central metropolitan areas. We did not observe significant differences in the odds of utilizing physical therapy among individuals living in large fringe metropolitan areas or medium–small metropolitan areas.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusions</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Individuals living in rural parts of the United States have lower odds of using physical therapy for management of their severe chronic back pain. Additional research is needed to examine the factors that contribute to these differences and improve access to care.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":50060,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rural Health","volume":"41 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2025-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143015112","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Correction to “Rural–urban disparities in cardiovascular disease mortality vary by poverty level and region” 修正“城乡心血管疾病死亡率差异因贫困程度和地区而异”。
IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Pub Date : 2025-01-20 DOI: 10.1111/jrh.12918

Sekkarie A, Woodruff RC, Casper M, Thompson-Paul AM, Vaughan AS. Rural–urban disparities in cardiovascular disease mortality vary by poverty level and region. The Journal of Rural Health. 2025; 41 (1): e12874. https://doi.org/10.1111/jrh.12874

The following correction has been made after publication:

The author name “Angela-Thompson Paul” has been corrected to “Angela M. Thompson-Paul”.

The online version of this article has been corrected accordingly.

We apologize for this error.

{"title":"Correction to “Rural–urban disparities in cardiovascular disease mortality vary by poverty level and region”","authors":"","doi":"10.1111/jrh.12918","DOIUrl":"10.1111/jrh.12918","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Sekkarie A, Woodruff RC, Casper M, Thompson-Paul AM, Vaughan AS. Rural–urban disparities in cardiovascular disease mortality vary by poverty level and region. The Journal of Rural Health. 2025; 41 (1): e12874. https://doi.org/10.1111/jrh.12874</p><p>The following correction has been made after publication:</p><p>The author name “Angela-Thompson Paul” has been corrected to “Angela M. Thompson-Paul”.</p><p>The online version of this article has been corrected accordingly.</p><p>We apologize for this error.</p>","PeriodicalId":50060,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rural Health","volume":"41 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2025-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jrh.12918","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143015109","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Rural nonprofit hospital community benefit and financial assistance spending: A call for greater reporting transparency 农村非营利性医院社区福利和财政援助支出:呼吁提高报告透明度。
IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Pub Date : 2025-01-11 DOI: 10.1111/jrh.12914
Hannah MacDougall PhD, Melissa Latcham MSW, Erica Eliason PhD

Purpose

US nonprofit hospitals must provide community benefits including financial assistance to be tax-exempt. Rural residents particularly benefit from financial assistance because they have higher medical debt on average. The Internal Revenue Service allows nonprofit hospitals that are members of health systems to report expenditures for their entire system (group returns) rather than for individual hospitals. Our study examined how (if at all) rural nonprofit hospitals filing group returns are different than those filing individual returns.

Methods

We used 2021 data extracted from Community Benefit Insight and the American Hospital Association for 100 rural nonprofit hospitals in Wisconsin and Minnesota. We conducted bivariate analyses examining differences in mean total community benefit spending and mean financial assistance spending as a percentage of total operating expenses for hospitals filing individual versus group returns. We conducted multivariable regression models examining the association of filing group returns and individual returns with community benefit spending and financial assistance spending.

Findings

Bivariate analysis revealed significant differences between group return hospitals and individual return hospitals in spending on community benefits (5.81% vs. 9.49%, respectively) and on financial assistance (0.36% vs. 0.71% respectively). Multivariable regression demonstrated filing group returns is significantly negatively associated with community benefit expenditures (β = –2.90, p < 0.05) and financial assistance expenditures (β = –0.31, p < 0.01).

Conclusion

In our sample, filing group returns was associated with less spending on community benefits and financial assistance. To understand this finding, researchers need data on individual hospital spending to increase transparency and accountability.

目的:美国非营利性医院必须提供包括财政援助在内的社区福利才能免税。农村居民尤其受益于财政援助,因为他们的平均医疗债务更高。美国国税局允许作为卫生系统成员的非营利性医院报告其整个系统的支出(集团回报),而不是单个医院的支出。我们的研究考察了(如果有的话)农村非营利医院提交集体申报与提交个人申报有何不同。方法:我们使用了从社区福利洞察和美国医院协会提取的2021年数据,用于威斯康星州和明尼苏达州的100家农村非营利医院。我们进行了双变量分析,检查了提交个人和团体回报的医院的平均总社区福利支出和平均财政援助支出占总运营支出的百分比的差异。我们进行了多变量回归模型,检验了团体报税和个人报税与社区福利支出和财政援助支出之间的关系。结果:双变量分析显示,团体返回医院和个体返回医院在社区福利支出(分别为5.81%对9.49%)和财政援助支出(分别为0.36%对0.71%)方面存在显著差异。多变量回归表明,申报组收益与社区福利支出(β = -2.90, p < 0.05)和财政援助支出(β = -0.31, p < 0.01)呈显著负相关。结论:在我们的样本中,提交团体申报表与较少的社区福利和财政援助支出有关。为了理解这一发现,研究人员需要有关个别医院支出的数据,以提高透明度和问责制。
{"title":"Rural nonprofit hospital community benefit and financial assistance spending: A call for greater reporting transparency","authors":"Hannah MacDougall PhD,&nbsp;Melissa Latcham MSW,&nbsp;Erica Eliason PhD","doi":"10.1111/jrh.12914","DOIUrl":"10.1111/jrh.12914","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Purpose</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>US nonprofit hospitals must provide community benefits including financial assistance to be tax-exempt. Rural residents particularly benefit from financial assistance because they have higher medical debt on average. The Internal Revenue Service allows nonprofit hospitals that are members of health systems to report expenditures for their entire system (group returns) rather than for individual hospitals. Our study examined how (if at all) rural nonprofit hospitals filing group returns are different than those filing individual returns.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>We used 2021 data extracted from Community Benefit Insight and the American Hospital Association for 100 rural nonprofit hospitals in Wisconsin and Minnesota. We conducted bivariate analyses examining differences in mean total community benefit spending and mean financial assistance spending as a percentage of total operating expenses for hospitals filing individual versus group returns. We conducted multivariable regression models examining the association of filing group returns and individual returns with community benefit spending and financial assistance spending.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Findings</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Bivariate analysis revealed significant differences between group return hospitals and individual return hospitals in spending on community benefits (5.81% vs. 9.49%, respectively) and on financial assistance (0.36% vs. 0.71% respectively). Multivariable regression demonstrated filing group returns is significantly negatively associated with community benefit expenditures (<i>β</i> = –2.90, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.05) and financial assistance expenditures (<i>β</i> = –0.31, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.01).</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusion</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>In our sample, filing group returns was associated with less spending on community benefits and financial assistance. To understand this finding, researchers need data on individual hospital spending to increase transparency and accountability.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":50060,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rural Health","volume":"41 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2025-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11724223/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142967314","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Determinants of HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) use among men who have sex with men (MSM) living in rural areas of the United States: A scoping review framed by the PrEP care continuum 美国农村地区男男性行为者(MSM)使用HIV暴露前预防(PrEP)的决定因素:PrEP护理连续体框架的范围审查。
IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Pub Date : 2025-01-08 DOI: 10.1111/jrh.12916
Andrew M. O'Neil MPH, Randolph D. Hubach PhD, MPH, Christopher Owens PhD, MPH, Jennifer L. Walsh PhD, Katherine G. Quinn PhD, Steven A. John PhD, MPH

Background

HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is a highly effective intervention to prevent HIV transmission among men who have sex with men (MSM). Despite its effectiveness, PrEP uptake and adherence among MSM in the United States remain suboptimal, particularly in rural areas.

Objective

The present study presents a scoping review of the self-reported barriers and facilitators of PrEP use among MSM living in rural areas of the United States.

Design

Preferred Items for Systematic Reviews—Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines informed this review. Seven online databases were searched to identify papers published from 2012 to 2023 in English with keywords related the concepts of MSM, rural, and HIV PrEP.

Results

From an initial 340 articles, nine were selected. Awareness significantly impacts PrEP uptake in rural areas, with challenges including limited dissemination of information through mainstream channels and low perceived HIV risk among rural MSM. However, nonmainstream information sources can enhance PrEP awareness and use. Several barriers hinder rural residents from accessing PrEP, such as a lack of competent providers, geographic isolation, cost, and stigma. High PrEP care costs, lack of financial assistance for lab work, and limited telePrEP options are key challenges in retaining individuals in PrEP care.

Conclusions

Suboptimal PrEP uptake in rural areas with high HIV burden remains a concern, hindered by limited information dissemination, low perceived HIV risk, geographic isolation, nonaffirming medical providers, and expensive PrEP care. Leveraging telePrEP, co-pay assistance, 340B drug pricing, and geospatial networking apps can enhance PrEP use. Multilevel interventions are crucial to combat the HIV epidemic in rural regions.

背景:HIV暴露前预防(PrEP)是预防HIV在男男性行为者(MSM)中传播的一种非常有效的干预措施。尽管PrEP有效,但在美国,尤其是在农村地区,男男性接触者对PrEP的接受和坚持程度仍不理想。目的:本研究提出了一个范围审查自我报告的障碍和促进PrEP使用在生活在美国农村地区的男同性恋者。设计:系统评价首选项目-扩展范围评价(PRISMA-ScR)指南为本次评价提供了依据。在7个在线数据库中检索2012 - 2023年间发表的与MSM、农村和HIV prep概念相关的英文论文。结果:从最初的340篇论文中筛选出9篇。意识对农村地区预防措施的接受有重大影响,面临的挑战包括通过主流渠道传播信息有限以及农村男男性行为者对艾滋病毒风险的认知较低。然而,非主流信息来源可以提高PrEP的认识和使用。一些障碍阻碍农村居民获得预防措施,如缺乏合格的提供者、地理隔离、费用和耻辱。高昂的PrEP护理费用、缺乏对实验室工作的财政援助以及有限的远程PrEP选择是留住PrEP护理人员的主要挑战。结论:在艾滋病毒负担高的农村地区,由于信息传播有限、艾滋病毒风险认知低、地理隔离、医疗服务提供者不确定以及PrEP护理费用昂贵,PrEP使用率不佳仍然是一个问题。利用远程PrEP、共同支付援助、340B药品定价和地理空间网络应用程序可以提高PrEP的使用。多层干预措施对于在农村地区防治艾滋病毒流行病至关重要。
{"title":"Determinants of HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) use among men who have sex with men (MSM) living in rural areas of the United States: A scoping review framed by the PrEP care continuum","authors":"Andrew M. O'Neil MPH,&nbsp;Randolph D. Hubach PhD, MPH,&nbsp;Christopher Owens PhD, MPH,&nbsp;Jennifer L. Walsh PhD,&nbsp;Katherine G. Quinn PhD,&nbsp;Steven A. John PhD, MPH","doi":"10.1111/jrh.12916","DOIUrl":"10.1111/jrh.12916","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Background</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is a highly effective intervention to prevent HIV transmission among men who have sex with men (MSM). Despite its effectiveness, PrEP uptake and adherence among MSM in the United States remain suboptimal, particularly in rural areas.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Objective</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>The present study presents a scoping review of the self-reported barriers and facilitators of PrEP use among MSM living in rural areas of the United States.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Design</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Preferred Items for Systematic Reviews—Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines informed this review. Seven online databases were searched to identify papers published from 2012 to 2023 in English with keywords related the concepts of MSM, rural, and HIV PrEP.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>From an initial 340 articles, nine were selected. Awareness significantly impacts PrEP uptake in rural areas, with challenges including limited dissemination of information through mainstream channels and low perceived HIV risk among rural MSM. However, nonmainstream information sources can enhance PrEP awareness and use. Several barriers hinder rural residents from accessing PrEP, such as a lack of competent providers, geographic isolation, cost, and stigma. High PrEP care costs, lack of financial assistance for lab work, and limited telePrEP options are key challenges in retaining individuals in PrEP care.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusions</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Suboptimal PrEP uptake in rural areas with high HIV burden remains a concern, hindered by limited information dissemination, low perceived HIV risk, geographic isolation, nonaffirming medical providers, and expensive PrEP care. Leveraging telePrEP, co-pay assistance, 340B drug pricing, and geospatial networking apps can enhance PrEP use. Multilevel interventions are crucial to combat the HIV epidemic in rural regions.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":50060,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rural Health","volume":"41 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2025-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142958011","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Sexualized drug use factors among rural sexual minority men 农村性少数群体男性性化用药因素分析
IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Pub Date : 2025-01-08 DOI: 10.1111/jrh.12917
Christopher Owens PhD, MPH, Benjamin N. Montemayor PhD

Purpose

Although rural sexual minority men (SMM) use substances immediately before/during sex (i.e., sexualized drug use), the factors contributing to this behavior are unknown. We examined the factors associated with past year sexualized drug use among rural SMM.

Methods

Rural SMM in the Southern region of the United States (N = 345) completed an online cross-sectional survey from February to March 23, 2024. Participants answered questions about their sexualized drug use behaviors, sexual behaviors, minority stressors, and demographics. We conducted a hierarchical logistic regression to estimate the adjusted odds ratios (aORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for factors associated with past year sexualized drug use.

Findings

Over three-quarters of participants (79.7%) used substances immediately before/during sex in the past year. Sexualized drug use was associated with exposure to sexual minority stressors, polysubstance use, sexually transmitted infection testing, having oral sex, receiving drugs from a man in exchange for sex, and older age.

Conclusion

Sexualized drug use is prevalent among rural SMM, and sexual minority stressors and past year sexual risk and substance misuse behaviors were contributing factors. Rural primary care clinics, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)/acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) service organizations, and outpatient and inpatient substance use organizations should implement integrative sexual and substance use screening, counseling, and referral services for their rural clients.

目的:尽管农村性少数男性(SMM)在性行为前/性交中立即使用药物(即性化药物使用),但导致这种行为的因素尚不清楚。我们调查了过去一年中农村SMM中性化药物使用的相关因素。方法:于2024年2月至3月23日,对美国南部地区农村SMM (N = 345)进行在线横断面调查。参与者回答了关于他们的性化药物使用行为、性行为、少数民族压力源和人口统计学的问题。我们进行了分层逻辑回归来估计与过去一年性别化药物使用相关因素的调整优势比(aORs)和95%置信区间(CIs)。调查结果:过去一年,超过四分之三(79.7%)的参与者在做爱前或做爱时立即使用药物。性化药物使用与暴露于性少数压力源、多种物质使用、性传播感染检测、口交、从男性处接受药物以换取性行为以及年龄较大有关。结论:性化吸毒在农村中小农民工中普遍存在,性少数压力源、过去一年的性风险和药物滥用行为是影响因素。农村初级保健诊所、人类免疫缺陷病毒(艾滋病毒)/获得性免疫缺陷综合症(艾滋病)服务组织以及门诊和住院药物使用组织应为其农村客户实施综合性和药物使用筛查、咨询和转诊服务。
{"title":"Sexualized drug use factors among rural sexual minority men","authors":"Christopher Owens PhD, MPH,&nbsp;Benjamin N. Montemayor PhD","doi":"10.1111/jrh.12917","DOIUrl":"10.1111/jrh.12917","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Purpose</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Although rural sexual minority men (SMM) use substances immediately before/during sex (i.e., sexualized drug use), the factors contributing to this behavior are unknown. We examined the factors associated with past year sexualized drug use among rural SMM.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Rural SMM in the Southern region of the United States (<i>N</i> = 345) completed an online cross-sectional survey from February to March 23, 2024. Participants answered questions about their sexualized drug use behaviors, sexual behaviors, minority stressors, and demographics. We conducted a hierarchical logistic regression to estimate the adjusted odds ratios (aORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for factors associated with past year sexualized drug use.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Findings</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Over three-quarters of participants (79.7%) used substances immediately before/during sex in the past year. Sexualized drug use was associated with exposure to sexual minority stressors, polysubstance use, sexually transmitted infection testing, having oral sex, receiving drugs from a man in exchange for sex, and older age.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusion</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Sexualized drug use is prevalent among rural SMM, and sexual minority stressors and past year sexual risk and substance misuse behaviors were contributing factors. Rural primary care clinics, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)/acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) service organizations, and outpatient and inpatient substance use organizations should implement integrative sexual and substance use screening, counseling, and referral services for their rural clients.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":50060,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rural Health","volume":"41 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2025-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11711912/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142958012","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Well-being interventions for rural health professionals: A scoping review 农村卫生专业人员的福祉干预:范围审查。
IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Pub Date : 2025-01-05 DOI: 10.1111/jrh.12909
Skye McKennon PharmD, BCPS, ACSM-GEI, Suzanne Fricke DVM, MLIS, Dawn DeWitt MDMSc, CMedEd, MACP, FRACP, FRCP-London

Introduction

The objective of this scoping review is to identify interventions to promote well-being that have been tried or proven effective to prevent or address burnout in rural health care professionals and trainees (HCPTs). Secondarily, we aimed to identify potentially applicable and feasible well-being interventions that could help rural HCPTs.

Methods and analysis

We used PRISMA guidelines to conduct a scoping review of peer-reviewed English language studies, from all countries, published in core health sciences databases. We focused on intervention studies for burnout and well-being in rural HCPTs published from July 2013 to January 2024. Searches identified 571 studies; 18 additional studies were identified from hand searches of websites, reviews, and bibliographies identified in the original search strategy. Two authors screened and extracted all data using Covidence.

Findings

After deduplication, 507 studies were screened for inclusion, and 50 full-text studies were assessed for eligibility. After discussion and consensus, 30 studies were selected for inclusion. We included selected “applicable” studies, for example, online interventions. We excluded potentially applicable studies that would not be feasible in rural settings, that is, health system interventions requiring substantial personnel and infrastructure. Interventions included individual interventions (eg, mindfulness), increased support for professionals (eg, remote pharmacist assistance), and interventions to improve quality or teamwork.

Conclusions

Few interventional studies have been done to support well-being and prevent burnout in vulnerable rural HCPTs. While individual interventions, such as mindfulness, are most effective to date, studies replicating or extending these interventions, and to identify supports that address workload and systems issues are needed.

引言:本范围审查的目的是确定已被尝试或证明有效预防或解决农村卫生保健专业人员和受训人员(HCPTs)倦怠的促进福祉的干预措施。其次,我们的目标是确定可能适用和可行的福祉干预措施,可以帮助农村HCPTs。方法和分析:我们使用PRISMA指南对发表在核心健康科学数据库中的来自所有国家的同行评议的英语研究进行了范围审查。我们关注2013年7月至2024年1月发表的农村HCPTs的倦怠和幸福感干预研究。搜索确定了571项研究;从原始搜索策略中确定的网站、评论和参考书目中手工搜索确定了另外18项研究。两位作者使用covid - ence筛选和提取了所有数据。结果:在重复数据删除后,507项研究被筛选纳入,50项全文研究被评估为合格。经过讨论和共识,我们选择了30项研究纳入。我们选择了“适用”的研究,例如在线干预。我们排除了在农村环境中不可行的潜在适用研究,即需要大量人员和基础设施的卫生系统干预措施。干预措施包括个人干预(例如,正念),增加对专业人员的支持(例如,远程药剂师协助),以及提高质量或团队合作的干预措施。结论:很少有干预研究支持农村弱势HCPTs的福祉和预防倦怠。虽然个人干预措施,如正念,是迄今为止最有效的,但需要研究复制或扩展这些干预措施,并确定解决工作量和系统问题的支持。
{"title":"Well-being interventions for rural health professionals: A scoping review","authors":"Skye McKennon PharmD, BCPS, ACSM-GEI,&nbsp;Suzanne Fricke DVM, MLIS,&nbsp;Dawn DeWitt MDMSc, CMedEd, MACP, FRACP, FRCP-London","doi":"10.1111/jrh.12909","DOIUrl":"10.1111/jrh.12909","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Introduction</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>The objective of this scoping review is to identify interventions to promote well-being that have been tried or proven effective to prevent or address burnout in rural health care professionals and trainees (HCPTs). Secondarily, we aimed to identify potentially applicable and feasible well-being interventions that could help rural HCPTs.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods and analysis</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>We used PRISMA guidelines to conduct a scoping review of peer-reviewed English language studies, from all countries, published in core health sciences databases. We focused on intervention studies for burnout and well-being in rural HCPTs published from July 2013 to January 2024. Searches identified 571 studies; 18 additional studies were identified from hand searches of websites, reviews, and bibliographies identified in the original search strategy. Two authors screened and extracted all data using Covidence.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Findings</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>After deduplication, 507 studies were screened for inclusion, and 50 full-text studies were assessed for eligibility. After discussion and consensus, 30 studies were selected for inclusion. We included selected “applicable” studies, for example, online interventions. We excluded potentially applicable studies that would not be feasible in rural settings, that is, health system interventions requiring substantial personnel and infrastructure. Interventions included individual interventions (eg, mindfulness), increased support for professionals (eg, remote pharmacist assistance), and interventions to improve quality or teamwork.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusions</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Few interventional studies have been done to support well-being and prevent burnout in vulnerable rural HCPTs. While individual interventions, such as mindfulness, are most effective to date, studies replicating or extending these interventions, and to identify supports that address workload and systems issues are needed.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":50060,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rural Health","volume":"41 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2025-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11701247/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142933401","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
What cancers explain the growing rural-urban gap in human papillomavirus-associated cancer incidence? 哪些癌症可以解释人乳头瘤病毒相关癌症发病率的城乡差距?
IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Pub Date : 2025-01-05 DOI: 10.1111/jrh.12915
Jason Semprini PhD, MPP, Whitney Zahnd PhD, Heather M. Brandt PhD

Purpose

Human papillomavirus (HPV) can cause cancers of the genital system, anus/rectum, and oropharynx. Prior research showed that HPV-associated cancer incidence was rising faster in nonmetro than in metro populations. Our study identified which cancers contributed to the widening disparity.

Methods

Representing ∼93% of all cancers in the United States, we analyzed data from the North American Association of Central Cancer Registries (2000-2019). Restricting the analysis to HPV-associated cancers, we compared 5-year average age-adjusted incidence rates (per 100,000 population) for nonmetropolitan (Rural-Urban Continuum Codes 4-9) and metropolitan populations, by sex and cancer site. To quantify the rural-urban gap, we calculated rate ratios and absolute differences of incidence trends.

Results

Although incidence was similar in 2000-2004 (nonmetropolitan = 9.9; metropolitan = 9.9), incidence in 2015-2019 was significantly higher in nonmetropolitan (12.3) than metropolitan (11.1) populations. The gap was widest for cervical cancers (females) in 2015-2019 (1.0 case per 100,000) but grew the most since 2000-2004 in oropharyngeal cancers among males (+1.1 cases per 100,000). The nonmetropolitan rate ratios for females (RR = 1.15, 95% C.I. = 1.13, 1.17) and males (RR = 1.07, 95% C.I. = 1.05, 1.09) in 2015-2019 were higher than the respective RRs for all other years. Since 2000, the nonmetropolitan disparity has significantly grown for anal and cervical cancers in females, and oropharyngeal cancers in both sexes.

Discussion

Although preventable, nonmetropolitan Americans have shouldered a growing burden of HPV-associated cancers. To address these cervical, anal, and oropharyngeal cancer disparities, it is imperative that HPV vaccination programs are effectively implemented at scale.

目的:人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)可引起生殖系统、肛门/直肠和口咽部的癌症。先前的研究表明,与hpv相关的癌症发病率在非城市人口中比在城市人口中上升得更快。我们的研究确定了哪些癌症导致了差距的扩大。方法:我们分析了北美中央癌症登记协会(2000-2019)的数据,代表了美国所有癌症的93%。将分析限制在hpv相关癌症,我们比较了非大都市(城乡连续代码4-9)和大都市人口按性别和癌症部位的5年平均年龄调整发病率(每10万人)。为了量化城乡差距,我们计算了发病率比和发病率趋势的绝对差异。结果:虽然2000-2004年发病率相似(非大都市= 9.9;大都市= 9.9),2015-2019年非大都市人群的发病率(12.3)明显高于大都市人群(11.1)。2015-2019年宫颈癌(女性)的差距最大(每10万例1.0例),但自2000-2004年以来,男性口咽癌的差距最大(每10万例+1.1例)。2015-2019年女性(RR = 1.15, 95% C.I. = 1.13, 1.17)和男性(RR = 1.07, 95% C.I. = 1.05, 1.09)的非大都市发病率比均高于其他年份。自2000年以来,女性肛门癌和宫颈癌以及男女口咽癌的非都市差异显著扩大。讨论:虽然可以预防,但非大城市的美国人已经承担了越来越多的hpv相关癌症的负担。为了解决这些宫颈癌、肛门癌和口咽癌的差异,必须大规模有效地实施HPV疫苗接种计划。
{"title":"What cancers explain the growing rural-urban gap in human papillomavirus-associated cancer incidence?","authors":"Jason Semprini PhD, MPP,&nbsp;Whitney Zahnd PhD,&nbsp;Heather M. Brandt PhD","doi":"10.1111/jrh.12915","DOIUrl":"10.1111/jrh.12915","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Purpose</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Human papillomavirus (HPV) can cause cancers of the genital system, anus/rectum, and oropharynx. Prior research showed that HPV-associated cancer incidence was rising faster in nonmetro than in metro populations. Our study identified which cancers contributed to the widening disparity.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Representing ∼93% of all cancers in the United States, we analyzed data from the North American Association of Central Cancer Registries (2000-2019). Restricting the analysis to HPV-associated cancers, we compared 5-year average age-adjusted incidence rates (per 100,000 population) for nonmetropolitan (Rural-Urban Continuum Codes 4-9) and metropolitan populations, by sex and cancer site. To quantify the rural-urban gap, we calculated rate ratios and absolute differences of incidence trends.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Although incidence was similar in 2000-2004 (nonmetropolitan = 9.9; metropolitan = 9.9), incidence in 2015-2019 was significantly higher in nonmetropolitan (12.3) than metropolitan (11.1) populations. The gap was widest for cervical cancers (females) in 2015-2019 (1.0 case per 100,000) but grew the most since 2000-2004 in oropharyngeal cancers among males (+1.1 cases per 100,000). The nonmetropolitan rate ratios for females (RR = 1.15, 95% C.I. = 1.13, 1.17) and males (RR = 1.07, 95% C.I. = 1.05, 1.09) in 2015-2019 were higher than the respective RRs for all other years. Since 2000, the nonmetropolitan disparity has significantly grown for anal and cervical cancers in females, and oropharyngeal cancers in both sexes.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Discussion</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Although preventable, nonmetropolitan Americans have shouldered a growing burden of HPV-associated cancers. To address these cervical, anal, and oropharyngeal cancer disparities, it is imperative that HPV vaccination programs are effectively implemented at scale.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":50060,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rural Health","volume":"41 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2025-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jrh.12915","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142933404","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Social determinants of contraception use among rural adolescents: Implications for addressing disparities 农村青少年避孕使用的社会决定因素:解决差异的意义。
IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Pub Date : 2024-12-27 DOI: 10.1111/jrh.12901
Asia S. Bishop MSW, PhD, Paula S. Nurius MSW, PhD, Ashley N. Rousson MSW, PhD, Anindita Bhattacharya MSW, PhD, Ella B. Baumgarten MPH

Purpose

Few studies have examined disparities in—and social determinants of—contraception use among rural adolescents despite evidence of higher teen birth rates and greater STI risk in rural communities. Guided by a social determinants of health (SDoH) framework, this cross-sectional study aimed to address these gaps.

Methods

Data come from the 2018 Healthy Youth Survey, including N = 3757 sexually active, rural-based adolescents. Chi-square and independent samples t-tests examined group differences in rates of self-reported contraception use (condoms and any form of contraception) at last sex. Logistic regression models examined associations between SDoH factors (social/community, economic, and health care access) and contraception use outcomes.

Findings

Contraception use disparities were observed for rural-based youth identifying as Black, Asian, Indigenous, and Latino/a/x/e; lesbian, gay, bisexual, and questioning their sexual identity (LGBQ); and those experiencing poverty. Regression models accounting for youth characteristics found that SDoH factors across the social/community domain—but not economic or health care access—were the strongest predictors of contraception use outcomes. In these models, LGBQ status remained negatively associated with contraception use.

Conclusions

Rural disparities in contraception use, particularly for marginalized youth, call for service approaches that are relevant and responsive to diverse needs. Findings also suggest that rural disparities are influenced by a complex interplay of social factors, where existing health care resources may not sufficiently mitigate youths’ adverse living conditions. Addressing contraception use disparities in rural communities will require greater uptake of comprehensive sexuality education and multilevel service approaches that attend to youths’ social contexts.

目的:很少有研究调查农村青少年避孕使用的差异和社会决定因素,尽管有证据表明农村社区的青少年出生率更高,性传播感染风险更高。在健康的社会决定因素框架的指导下,这项横断面研究旨在解决这些差距。方法:数据来自2018年健康青少年调查,包括N = 3757名性活跃的农村青少年。卡方检验和独立样本t检验检验了自我报告的最后一次性行为中使用避孕措施(避孕套和任何形式的避孕措施)的比率的组间差异。Logistic回归模型检验了SDoH因素(社会/社区、经济和卫生保健获取)与避孕使用结果之间的关系。研究结果:在黑人、亚洲人、土著和拉丁裔/a/x/e的农村青年中观察到避孕使用的差异;女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋,质疑自己的性身份(LGBQ);还有那些正在经历贫困的人。考虑青年特征的回归模型发现,整个社会/社区领域的SDoH因素(而不是经济或医疗保健获取)是避孕使用结果的最强预测因子。在这些模型中,LGBQ身份与避孕措施的使用仍然呈负相关。结论:农村避孕措施使用的差异,特别是边缘化青年的差异,要求采取相关的服务方法,满足不同的需求。研究结果还表明,农村差距受到社会因素复杂相互作用的影响,现有的卫生保健资源可能不足以缓解青年的恶劣生活条件。解决农村社区避孕使用差异的问题需要更多地采用综合性教育和针对青年社会背景的多层次服务方法。
{"title":"Social determinants of contraception use among rural adolescents: Implications for addressing disparities","authors":"Asia S. Bishop MSW, PhD,&nbsp;Paula S. Nurius MSW, PhD,&nbsp;Ashley N. Rousson MSW, PhD,&nbsp;Anindita Bhattacharya MSW, PhD,&nbsp;Ella B. Baumgarten MPH","doi":"10.1111/jrh.12901","DOIUrl":"10.1111/jrh.12901","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Purpose</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Few studies have examined disparities in—and social determinants of—contraception use among rural adolescents despite evidence of higher teen birth rates and greater STI risk in rural communities. Guided by a social determinants of health (SDoH) framework, this cross-sectional study aimed to address these gaps.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Data come from the 2018 Healthy Youth Survey, including <i>N</i> = 3757 sexually active, rural-based adolescents. Chi-square and independent samples <i>t</i>-tests examined group differences in rates of self-reported contraception use (condoms and any form of contraception) at last sex. Logistic regression models examined associations between SDoH factors (social/community, economic, and health care access) and contraception use outcomes.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Findings</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Contraception use disparities were observed for rural-based youth identifying as Black, Asian, Indigenous, and Latino/a/x/e; lesbian, gay, bisexual, and questioning their sexual identity (LGBQ); and those experiencing poverty. Regression models accounting for youth characteristics found that SDoH factors across the social/community domain—but not economic or health care access—were the strongest predictors of contraception use outcomes. In these models, LGBQ status remained negatively associated with contraception use.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusions</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Rural disparities in contraception use, particularly for marginalized youth, call for service approaches that are relevant and responsive to diverse needs. Findings also suggest that rural disparities are influenced by a complex interplay of social factors, where existing health care resources may not sufficiently mitigate youths’ adverse living conditions. Addressing contraception use disparities in rural communities will require greater uptake of comprehensive sexuality education and multilevel service approaches that attend to youths’ social contexts.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":50060,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rural Health","volume":"41 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2024-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142899922","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Journal of Rural Health
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1