首页 > 最新文献

Journal of Rural Health最新文献

英文 中文
The new Rural Emergency Hospital Designation Program: Will it improve access to care for rural Americans? 新的农村急救医院指定计划:它会改善美国农村居民获得护理的机会吗?
IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Pub Date : 2025-10-14 DOI: 10.1111/jrh.70079
Suzanne B. Daly PhD, Wei You MS, Elizabeth I. Merwin PhD
<p>Rural and urban differences in mortality and morbidity have been persistent.<span><sup>1-6</sup></span> Rural patients have higher rates of acute and chronic health problems such as obesity, diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and cancer.<span><sup>2, 7, 8</sup></span> Rural communities have higher numbers of uninsured individuals, rates of poverty and unemployment, lower rates of education, and greater difficulty accessing reliable transportation.<span><sup>2, 9</sup></span> They also have fewer hospitals and health care providers, and, despite numerous interventions, rural hospitals continue to close at a rapid rate, leaving rural patients facing increased challenges accessing health care.<span><sup>9, 10</sup></span> The combination of these factors has likely contributed to the gap between rural and urban morbidity and mortality that has continued to expand over the last several decades.</p><p>Rural hospitals are often the only source of care in their communities, as well as the largest employer, and closures threaten the health of rural communities.<span><sup>8, 11</sup></span> Medicaid expansion in 40 states and the District of Columbia has helped rural hospitals by providing compensation for care for patients who would otherwise be unable to pay.<span><sup>12, 13</sup></span> As shown in Figure 1, since 2005, 111 rural hospitals have completely closed, leaving many communities without local access to emergency, obstetric, and other medical services.<span><sup>14</sup></span> Over half of these closures have happened since 2014, the year Medicaid expansion coverage was available, with many closures occurring in states that had not or have not opted to expand Medicaid.<span><sup>13, 15</sup></span> Out of the top five states with the highest numbers of rural hospitals at risk of closure, only Oklahoma has chosen to expand Medicaid.<span><sup>12, 16</sup></span></p><p>In December 2020, a new federal payment program—the Rural Emergency Hospital (REH) program—was established by the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2021<span><sup>17</sup></span> in an effort to provide financial stability for rural hospitals and ensure local access to care for rural residents.<span><sup>10, 18</sup></span> The first hospitals were eligible to convert to a REH on January 1, 2023, with over 1500 hospitals eligible for the new designation.<span><sup>19</sup></span> In 2023, 19 hospitals converted, 18 in 2024, and three so far in 2025, for a total of 40 REHs currently operating.<span><sup>20</sup></span></p><p>Rural communities can ill-afford to lose access to health care. The loss of a hospital is not only the loss of health care services to patients in the community, it is an economic blow for the community with rural communities seeing hospital and non-hospital job losses.<span><sup>15</sup></span> Shuttering inpatient beds and no longer providing that service is not an easy decision for rural hospital executives, and understanding why these decisions are made i
农村和城市在死亡率和发病率方面的差异一直存在。农村患者患急性和慢性健康问题的比率较高,如肥胖、糖尿病、心血管疾病和癌症。2,7,8农村社区没有保险的人数较多,贫困率和失业率较高,受教育程度较低,获得可靠交通工具的难度较大。2,9农村的医院和保健提供者也较少,尽管采取了许多干预措施,但农村医院仍在迅速关闭,使农村病人在获得保健服务方面面临越来越大的挑战。9,10这些因素加在一起很可能造成了农村和城市发病率和死亡率之间的差距,这种差距在过去几十年里继续扩大。农村医院往往是所在社区唯一的保健来源,也是最大的雇主,关闭医院威胁到农村社区的健康。11、医疗补助计划在40个州和哥伦比亚特区的扩张帮助了农村医院,为那些无法支付医疗费用的病人提供了医疗补偿。12,13如图1所示,自2005年以来,111家农村医院完全关闭,使许多社区无法在当地获得急诊、产科和其他医疗服务其中超过一半的关闭发生在2014年之后,即医疗补助扩大覆盖范围的那一年,许多关闭发生在没有或没有选择扩大医疗补助的州。在面临关闭风险的乡村医院数量最多的五个州中,只有俄克拉荷马州选择了扩大医疗补助。“202117”,稳定农村医院资金,保障农村居民就近就医。10,18第一批医院于2023年1月1日有资格转换为REH,有1500多家医院有资格获得新的名称2023年,19家医院改造,2024年改造18家,2025年改造3家,目前总共有40家REHs在运营。20 .农村社区承受不起失去获得保健的机会。失去医院不仅是失去了对社区病人的医疗保健服务,而且是对社区的经济打击,农村社区看到医院和非医院工作岗位的损失对农村医院的管理者来说,关闭住院床位和不再提供医疗服务并不是一个容易的决定,了解做出这些决定的原因对于确定REH项目是否成功至关重要。40,55,56同样重要的是要确定决定转换(或不转换)到REH的财务影响。确定这项新方案是否正在改善农村医院的财务状况并使其免于关闭至关重要,因为这是改善农村患者和社区获得医疗服务的第一步。此外,研究人员需要检查患者的护理质量和结果,包括从REHs出院的患者和转移到一级或二级设施的患者。REH计划确实有可能为许多苦苦挣扎的农村医院提供生命线,并保留了获得门诊和急诊服务等基本护理的机会,否则如果农村医院完全关闭,这些服务就会消失。了解和评估新的REH项目的真正影响对于稳定和改善农村医疗保健和农村患者的预后至关重要。作者声明无利益冲突。所有的作者对这份手稿的准备都作出了实质性的贡献。作者证明,他们没有隶属关系或参与任何组织或实体与任何经济利益相关的材料在这篇文章中讨论。
{"title":"The new Rural Emergency Hospital Designation Program: Will it improve access to care for rural Americans?","authors":"Suzanne B. Daly PhD,&nbsp;Wei You MS,&nbsp;Elizabeth I. Merwin PhD","doi":"10.1111/jrh.70079","DOIUrl":"10.1111/jrh.70079","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;Rural and urban differences in mortality and morbidity have been persistent.&lt;span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;1-6&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/span&gt; Rural patients have higher rates of acute and chronic health problems such as obesity, diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and cancer.&lt;span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;2, 7, 8&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/span&gt; Rural communities have higher numbers of uninsured individuals, rates of poverty and unemployment, lower rates of education, and greater difficulty accessing reliable transportation.&lt;span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;2, 9&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/span&gt; They also have fewer hospitals and health care providers, and, despite numerous interventions, rural hospitals continue to close at a rapid rate, leaving rural patients facing increased challenges accessing health care.&lt;span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;9, 10&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/span&gt; The combination of these factors has likely contributed to the gap between rural and urban morbidity and mortality that has continued to expand over the last several decades.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Rural hospitals are often the only source of care in their communities, as well as the largest employer, and closures threaten the health of rural communities.&lt;span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;8, 11&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/span&gt; Medicaid expansion in 40 states and the District of Columbia has helped rural hospitals by providing compensation for care for patients who would otherwise be unable to pay.&lt;span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;12, 13&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/span&gt; As shown in Figure 1, since 2005, 111 rural hospitals have completely closed, leaving many communities without local access to emergency, obstetric, and other medical services.&lt;span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;14&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/span&gt; Over half of these closures have happened since 2014, the year Medicaid expansion coverage was available, with many closures occurring in states that had not or have not opted to expand Medicaid.&lt;span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;13, 15&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/span&gt; Out of the top five states with the highest numbers of rural hospitals at risk of closure, only Oklahoma has chosen to expand Medicaid.&lt;span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;12, 16&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In December 2020, a new federal payment program—the Rural Emergency Hospital (REH) program—was established by the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2021&lt;span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;17&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/span&gt; in an effort to provide financial stability for rural hospitals and ensure local access to care for rural residents.&lt;span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;10, 18&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/span&gt; The first hospitals were eligible to convert to a REH on January 1, 2023, with over 1500 hospitals eligible for the new designation.&lt;span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;19&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/span&gt; In 2023, 19 hospitals converted, 18 in 2024, and three so far in 2025, for a total of 40 REHs currently operating.&lt;span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;20&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Rural communities can ill-afford to lose access to health care. The loss of a hospital is not only the loss of health care services to patients in the community, it is an economic blow for the community with rural communities seeing hospital and non-hospital job losses.&lt;span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;15&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/span&gt; Shuttering inpatient beds and no longer providing that service is not an easy decision for rural hospital executives, and understanding why these decisions are made i","PeriodicalId":50060,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rural Health","volume":"41 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12521877/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145294289","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Rural-urban differences in dietary intake across pregnancy trimesters: A multisite prospective cohort study 孕期饮食摄入的城乡差异:一项多地点前瞻性队列研究。
IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Pub Date : 2025-10-14 DOI: 10.1111/jrh.70085
Alex H. Crisp PhD, Bethany Barone Gibbs PhD, Jacob B. Gallagher PhD, Katrina L. Wilhite PhD, Angela C. B. Trude PhD, Treah Haggerty PhD, Kara M. Whitaker PhD

Purpose

Poor diet during pregnancy compromises maternal–fetal health and may reflect broader environmental and structural inequities. This study investigated differences in dietary intake across pregnancy among rural and urban women in the United States and assessed whether socioeconomic status (SES) modified rural–urban differences.

Methods

In this prospective study, pregnant women (n = 495; 22.4% rural) from three sites (Iowa, Pennsylvania, West Virginia) had dietary intake estimated via the 26-item Dietary Screener Questionnaire (DSQ) during each trimester. Rural was defined as Rural–Urban Commuting Area (RUCA) code ≥ 4. A SES score was derived using Principal Component Analysis of education, annual household income, and insurance type. Adjusted robust linear mixed-effects models (controlled for site, age, minority status, pre-pregnancy BMI) compared dietary intakes between rural and urban participants, with trimester and SES interactions.

Findings

Compared to their urban counterparts, rural participants had higher predicted intakes of added sugars from sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs) in the first (0.61 tsp eq/day; 95% CI: [0.04, 1.18]) and second trimesters (0.62 tsp eq/day [0.05, 1.21]), and less fiber across all trimesters (ranging from –0.90 g/day [–1.7, –0.1] to –1.2 g/day [–2.0, –0.3]). Women in the high-SES urban group had higher intakes of fiber and calcium, and lower intakes of SSBs compared to their low-SES counterparts in both rural and urban settings.

Conclusions

Although rurality was associated with greater SSBs and lower fiber intake, differences were modest. Low-SES was related to a poorer diet regardless of geography, highlighting the need for targeted interventions for both rural and urban low-SES pregnant women.

目的:怀孕期间不良饮食会损害母胎健康,并可能反映更广泛的环境和结构不平等。本研究调查了美国农村和城市妇女怀孕期间饮食摄入量的差异,并评估了社会经济地位(SES)是否会改变城乡差异。方法:在这项前瞻性研究中,来自三个地区(爱荷华州、宾夕法尼亚州和西弗吉尼亚州)的孕妇(n = 495; 22.4%为农村孕妇)在每个三个月通过26项饮食筛查问卷(DSQ)评估饮食摄入量。农村定义为城乡通勤区(RUCA)代码≥4。利用教育程度、家庭年收入和保险类型的主成分分析得出SES得分。调整后的鲁棒线性混合效应模型(控制地点、年龄、少数民族身份、孕前BMI)比较了农村和城市参与者的饮食摄入量,以及孕期和SES的相互作用。研究结果:与城市参与者相比,农村参与者在妊娠早期(0.61茶匙当量/天;95% CI:[0.04, 1.18])和妊娠中期(0.62茶匙当量/天[0.05,1.21])预测从含糖饮料(SSBs)中添加糖的摄入量更高,而在所有妊娠期间(范围从-0.90克/天[-1.7,-0.1]到-1.2克/天[-2.0,-0.3])纤维摄入量更少。高社会经济地位的城市妇女与农村和城市的低社会经济地位妇女相比,纤维和钙的摄入量更高,SSBs的摄入量更低。结论:尽管农村生活与较高的ssb和较低的纤维摄入量有关,但差异不大。无论地理位置如何,低社会经济地位与较差的饮食有关,这突出了对农村和城市低社会经济地位孕妇进行有针对性干预的必要性。
{"title":"Rural-urban differences in dietary intake across pregnancy trimesters: A multisite prospective cohort study","authors":"Alex H. Crisp PhD,&nbsp;Bethany Barone Gibbs PhD,&nbsp;Jacob B. Gallagher PhD,&nbsp;Katrina L. Wilhite PhD,&nbsp;Angela C. B. Trude PhD,&nbsp;Treah Haggerty PhD,&nbsp;Kara M. Whitaker PhD","doi":"10.1111/jrh.70085","DOIUrl":"10.1111/jrh.70085","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Purpose</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Poor diet during pregnancy compromises maternal–fetal health and may reflect broader environmental and structural inequities. This study investigated differences in dietary intake across pregnancy among rural and urban women in the United States and assessed whether socioeconomic status (SES) modified rural–urban differences.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>In this prospective study, pregnant women (<i>n</i> = 495; 22.4% rural) from three sites (Iowa, Pennsylvania, West Virginia) had dietary intake estimated via the 26-item Dietary Screener Questionnaire (DSQ) during each trimester. Rural was defined as Rural–Urban Commuting Area (RUCA) code ≥ 4. A SES score was derived using Principal Component Analysis of education, annual household income, and insurance type. Adjusted robust linear mixed-effects models (controlled for site, age, minority status, pre-pregnancy BMI) compared dietary intakes between rural and urban participants, with trimester and SES interactions.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Findings</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Compared to their urban counterparts, rural participants had higher predicted intakes of added sugars from sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs) in the first (0.61 tsp eq/day; 95% CI: [0.04, 1.18]) and second trimesters (0.62 tsp eq/day [0.05, 1.21]), and less fiber across all trimesters (ranging from –0.90 g/day [–1.7, –0.1] to –1.2 g/day [–2.0, –0.3]). Women in the high-SES urban group had higher intakes of fiber and calcium, and lower intakes of SSBs compared to their low-SES counterparts in both rural and urban settings.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusions</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Although rurality was associated with greater SSBs and lower fiber intake, differences were modest. Low-SES was related to a poorer diet regardless of geography, highlighting the need for targeted interventions for both rural and urban low-SES pregnant women.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":50060,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rural Health","volume":"41 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12519541/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145287574","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Bridging the gaps: Rural recovery community centers and their role in addressing substance use disorders 弥合差距:农村康复社区中心及其在解决药物使用障碍方面的作用
IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Pub Date : 2025-10-10 DOI: 10.1111/jrh.70084
Robert M. Bohler PhD, Ryan J. Lofaro PhD, Kenneth D. Smith PhD, J. Aaron Johnson PhD, Blerta Shehaj DrPH, Brian Kite CARES, CPS-AD, William A. Mase DrPH

Purpose

Recovery community centers (RCCs) offer a range of non-clinical services for individuals in recovery from substance use disorder (SUD). RCCs may play an important role in addressing rural service gaps. This study aims to increase our understanding of how rural RCCs address SUD, including how they serve individuals receiving medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD).

Methods

We conducted a mixed methods study consisting of pre-interview surveys and semi-structured interviews with 12 RCC directors in rural Georgia. The surveys examined organizational and participant characteristics and MOUD attitudes, and the interviews explored rural challenges, strategies to overcome challenges, and community collaborations. We conducted descriptive analyses of the survey data and analyzed interviews using thematic analysis.

Results

RCCs serviced an average of 41 new members per month and had an annual budget of $225,407. RCCs provided in-house or linked to many services that addressed social determinants of health. Most participants were in early recovery (<1 year), had criminal legal involvement, and lacked a high school education. In the thematic analysis, transportation and housing were commonly reported challenges. Additionally, RCCs provided essential treatment linkage, were the primary naloxone distributor in the area, and provided in-house mutual help organizations representing alternative recovery pathways. Collaboration with MOUD providers was minimal despite RCC efforts. Directors generally had positive attitudes towards MOUD.

Conclusion

Rural RCCs address a range of social determinants of health and may fill gaps in the SUD continuum of care, including harm reduction services, linkage to treatment, and expansion of recovery pathways.

康复社区中心(RCCs)为从物质使用障碍(SUD)中康复的个人提供一系列非临床服务。农村信用社可能在解决农村服务差距方面发挥重要作用。本研究旨在增加我们对农村rcc如何解决SUD的理解,包括他们如何为接受阿片类药物使用障碍(mod)药物治疗的个体提供服务。方法采用访谈前调查和半结构化访谈相结合的方法,对乔治亚州农村地区的12名RCC主任进行了研究。调查考察了组织和参与者的特征以及mod的态度,访谈探讨了农村面临的挑战、克服挑战的策略以及社区合作。我们对调查数据进行了描述性分析,并对访谈进行了专题分析。结果rcc平均每月服务41名新会员,年度预算为225,407美元。rcc提供内部服务或与许多解决健康问题社会决定因素的服务相联系。大多数参与者处于早期康复期(1年),有刑事法律案件,缺乏高中教育。在专题分析中,交通和住房是普遍报告的挑战。此外,rcc提供了必要的治疗联系,是该地区主要的纳洛酮分销商,并提供了代表替代康复途径的内部互助组织。尽管RCC做出了努力,但与mod提供商的合作仍然很少。导演们普遍对mod持积极态度。结论农村rcc解决了一系列健康的社会决定因素,并可能填补SUD连续护理的空白,包括减少危害服务,与治疗的联系,以及扩大康复途径。
{"title":"Bridging the gaps: Rural recovery community centers and their role in addressing substance use disorders","authors":"Robert M. Bohler PhD,&nbsp;Ryan J. Lofaro PhD,&nbsp;Kenneth D. Smith PhD,&nbsp;J. Aaron Johnson PhD,&nbsp;Blerta Shehaj DrPH,&nbsp;Brian Kite CARES, CPS-AD,&nbsp;William A. Mase DrPH","doi":"10.1111/jrh.70084","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jrh.70084","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Purpose</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Recovery community centers (RCCs) offer a range of non-clinical services for individuals in recovery from substance use disorder (SUD). RCCs may play an important role in addressing rural service gaps. This study aims to increase our understanding of how rural RCCs address SUD, including how they serve individuals receiving medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD).</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>We conducted a mixed methods study consisting of pre-interview surveys and semi-structured interviews with 12 RCC directors in rural Georgia. The surveys examined organizational and participant characteristics and MOUD attitudes, and the interviews explored rural challenges, strategies to overcome challenges, and community collaborations. We conducted descriptive analyses of the survey data and analyzed interviews using thematic analysis.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>RCCs serviced an average of 41 new members per month and had an annual budget of $225,407. RCCs provided in-house or linked to many services that addressed social determinants of health. Most participants were in early recovery (&lt;1 year), had criminal legal involvement, and lacked a high school education. In the thematic analysis, transportation and housing were commonly reported challenges. Additionally, RCCs provided essential treatment linkage, were the primary naloxone distributor in the area, and provided in-house mutual help organizations representing alternative recovery pathways. Collaboration with MOUD providers was minimal despite RCC efforts. Directors generally had positive attitudes towards MOUD.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusion</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Rural RCCs address a range of social determinants of health and may fill gaps in the SUD continuum of care, including harm reduction services, linkage to treatment, and expansion of recovery pathways.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":50060,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rural Health","volume":"41 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145272700","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Weaving the rural health safety net: Voices from the field 编织农村卫生安全网:来自田野的声音。
IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Pub Date : 2025-09-29 DOI: 10.1111/jrh.70080
Jessica Riley MS, Eileen M. Dryden PhD, Catherine M. P. Dawson MD, Meaghan A. Kennedy MD, MPH, Lauren R. Moo MD, Camilla B. Pimentel PhD, William Hung MD
{"title":"Weaving the rural health safety net: Voices from the field","authors":"Jessica Riley MS,&nbsp;Eileen M. Dryden PhD,&nbsp;Catherine M. P. Dawson MD,&nbsp;Meaghan A. Kennedy MD, MPH,&nbsp;Lauren R. Moo MD,&nbsp;Camilla B. Pimentel PhD,&nbsp;William Hung MD","doi":"10.1111/jrh.70080","DOIUrl":"10.1111/jrh.70080","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":50060,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rural Health","volume":"41 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145187395","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The roles of COVID-19 pandemic exposure and telehealth in prenatal care access for rural and racial minority communities in the United States: A retrospective cohort study COVID-19大流行暴露和远程医疗在美国农村和少数族裔社区产前护理获取中的作用:一项回顾性队列研究
IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Pub Date : 2025-09-29 DOI: 10.1111/jrh.70077
Peiyin Hung PhD, Jiani Yu PhD, Adiba B. Promiti MS, Berry A. Campbell MD, MFM, Nansi S. Boghossian PhD, Anirban Chatterjee MD, Bo Cai PhD, Jihong Liu ScD, the National COVID Cohort Collaborative Consortium

Purpose

To examine how COVID-19 public health emergency (PHE) exposure during pregnancy and telehealth use were associated with rural-urban and racial/ethnic differences in prenatal care initiation timing and frequency.

Methods

This retrospective cohort study of 349,682 pregnancies to birthing individuals who received both prenatal and intrapartum care at the 75 health systems in the United States contributing to the National Clinical Cohort Collaborative (N3C) from 6/1/2018 through 5/31/2022. Outcomes included prenatal care initiation timing and the number of prenatal care visits. Prenatal periods were categorized into 3 PHE exposure groups: (1) never, (2) partially, and (3) fully exposed to the PHE. The full-exposure group was further categorized into telehealth users and those with exclusively in-person care.

Findings

The full-exposure group with telehealth uptake had the earliest prenatal care initiation (median: 9 weeks [interquartile range: 7-13]) and the most visits (19 visits [12-20]). In contrast, the full-exposure group without telehealth use initiated care the latest (11 weeks [8-21]) and had the fewest visits (13 visits [6-22]). Rural-urban disparities persisted; however, telehealth users in both groups had earlier initiation and more visits. Racial and ethnic disparities in timeliness to initiation were most pronounced among the full-exposure group with telehealth (Black-White: adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]: 0.76, 95% CI, 0.70-0.83; Hispanic-White: aHR: 0.62, 95% CI, 0.58-0.68), compared to the full-exposure group with exclusively in-person care (Black-White: 0.95 [0.93-0.94]; Hispanic-White: 0.80 [0.80-0.81]).

Conclusions

Prenatal telehealth care improved early initiation but also exacerbated racial/ethnic disparities in the timeliness of prenatal care access. However, rural-urban disparities persisted.

目的:探讨妊娠期COVID-19突发公共卫生事件(PHE)暴露和远程医疗使用与城乡和种族/民族产前护理开始时间和频率差异的关系。方法:从2018年6月1日至2022年5月31日,这项回顾性队列研究纳入了349,682名怀孕至分娩的个体,这些个体在美国75个卫生系统接受了产前和产时护理,这些卫生系统为国家临床队列协作(N3C)做出了贡献。结果包括产前护理开始时间和产前护理访问次数。产前期被分为三个PHE暴露组:(1)从不暴露,(2)部分暴露,(3)完全暴露于PHE。全面接触组进一步分为远程保健用户和仅接受面对面护理的用户。结果:远程医疗全暴露组产前护理开始时间最早(中位数:9周[四分位数间距:7-13]),就诊次数最多(19次[12-20])。相比之下,未使用远程医疗的全暴露组开始护理时间最晚(11周[8-21]),就诊次数最少(13次[6-22])。城乡差距依然存在;然而,两组的远程医疗用户都有较早的开始和更多的访问。与完全面对面护理的完全接触组(黑人-白人:调整风险比[aHR]: 0.76, 95% CI, 0.70-0.83;西班牙裔-白人:aHR: 0.62, 95% CI, 0.58-0.68)相比,远程医疗的全面接触组(黑人-白人:0.95[0.93-0.94];西班牙裔-白人:0.80[0.80-0.81]),在开始治疗的及时性方面的种族和民族差异最为明显。结论:产前远程保健改善了早期启动,但也加剧了产前护理获得及时性的种族/民族差异。然而,城乡差距依然存在。
{"title":"The roles of COVID-19 pandemic exposure and telehealth in prenatal care access for rural and racial minority communities in the United States: A retrospective cohort study","authors":"Peiyin Hung PhD,&nbsp;Jiani Yu PhD,&nbsp;Adiba B. Promiti MS,&nbsp;Berry A. Campbell MD, MFM,&nbsp;Nansi S. Boghossian PhD,&nbsp;Anirban Chatterjee MD,&nbsp;Bo Cai PhD,&nbsp;Jihong Liu ScD,&nbsp;the National COVID Cohort Collaborative Consortium","doi":"10.1111/jrh.70077","DOIUrl":"10.1111/jrh.70077","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Purpose</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>To examine how COVID-19 public health emergency (PHE) exposure during pregnancy and telehealth use were associated with rural-urban and racial/ethnic differences in prenatal care initiation timing and frequency.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>This retrospective cohort study of 349,682 pregnancies to birthing individuals who received both prenatal and intrapartum care at the 75 health systems in the United States contributing to the National Clinical Cohort Collaborative (N3C) from 6/1/2018 through 5/31/2022. Outcomes included prenatal care initiation timing and the number of prenatal care visits. Prenatal periods were categorized into 3 PHE exposure groups: (1) never, (2) partially, and (3) fully exposed to the PHE. The full-exposure group was further categorized into telehealth users and those with exclusively in-person care.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Findings</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>The full-exposure group with telehealth uptake had the earliest prenatal care initiation (median: 9 weeks [interquartile range: 7-13]) and the most visits (19 visits [12-20]). In contrast, the full-exposure group <i>without</i> telehealth use initiated care the latest (11 weeks [8-21]) and had the fewest visits (13 visits [6-22]). Rural-urban disparities persisted; however, telehealth users in both groups had earlier initiation and more visits. Racial and ethnic disparities in timeliness to initiation were most pronounced among the full-exposure group with telehealth (Black-White: adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]: 0.76, 95% CI, 0.70-0.83; Hispanic-White: aHR: 0.62, 95% CI, 0.58-0.68), compared to the full-exposure group with exclusively in-person care (Black-White: 0.95 [0.93-0.94]; Hispanic-White: 0.80 [0.80-0.81]).</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusions</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Prenatal telehealth care improved early initiation but also exacerbated racial/ethnic disparities in the timeliness of prenatal care access. However, rural-urban disparities persisted.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":50060,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rural Health","volume":"41 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12481008/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145193700","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Differences in the travel burden for care between rural and urban patients with opioid use disorder by insurance type 农村和城市阿片类药物使用障碍患者按保险类型的医疗差旅负担差异
IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Pub Date : 2025-09-29 DOI: 10.1111/jrh.70078
C. Holly A. Andrilla MS, Sara C. Woolcock MPH, Lisa A. Garberson PhD, Janessa M. Graves PhD

Purpose

To compare the time and distance travel burden to access care for rural and urban Medicaid and commercially insured patients with opioid use disorder (OUD), and to understand where they travel for care.

Methods

We used Medicaid and the Health Care Cost Institute commercial insurance administrative claims data from 2019 to examine the travel burden to health care for adults ages 18 years and older with OUD. We calculated the one-way driving distance and travel time between the enrollee's residence and the provider's location. We used the 2013 Urban Influence Codes (UIC) to classify enrollees as either urban (UIC 1–2) or rural (UIC 3–12) based on the patient's residence county.

Findings

The median distance traveled for a visit by a rural Medicaid or rural commercially insured enrollee was more than twice as far as their urban counterparts (rural Medicaid: 45.9 miles, urban Medicaid: 13.9 miles; rural commercially insured: 32.9 miles, urban commercially insured: 12.4 miles). When we imputed zeros for care provided in the same ZIP Code as an enrollee's residence, these differences persisted. Rural Medicaid enrollees carried the largest travel burden spending an average of more than 60 min traveling to care, about 30 min more than rural commercially insured enrollees. Urban enrollees, regardless of insurance type received almost all of their care in an urban location while rural Medicaid and commercially insured patients traveled to an urban location for about half their visits.

Conclusions

Rural and urban Medicaid and commercially insured enrollees experience different time and distance travel burdens.

目的:比较农村和城市医疗补助和商业保险的阿片类药物使用障碍(OUD)患者获得护理的时间和距离负担,并了解他们前往何处接受护理。方法:我们使用医疗补助计划和医疗保健成本研究所2019年的商业保险行政索赔数据,研究18岁及以上OUD患者的医疗保健旅行负担。我们计算了投保人住所和医疗机构所在地之间的单程驾驶距离和旅行时间。我们使用2013年城市影响代码(UIC)根据患者居住的县将参选者分为城市(UIC 1-2)或农村(UIC 3-12)。研究结果:农村医疗补助计划或农村商业保险参保者就诊的中位数距离是城市参保者的两倍多(农村医疗补助计划:45.9英里,城市医疗补助计划:13.9英里;农村商业保险:32.9英里,城市商业保险:12.4英里)。当我们对与参保人居住地相同的邮政编码提供的医疗服务进行零输入时,这些差异仍然存在。农村医疗补助计划的参保者承担的旅行负担最大,平均花费超过60分钟,比农村商业参保的参保者多30分钟。无论保险类型如何,城市参保者几乎在城市地区接受了所有的医疗服务,而农村医疗补助计划和商业参保的患者大约有一半的就诊时间前往城市地区。结论:城乡医疗补助和商业参保参保人的时间和距离负担不同。
{"title":"Differences in the travel burden for care between rural and urban patients with opioid use disorder by insurance type","authors":"C. Holly A. Andrilla MS,&nbsp;Sara C. Woolcock MPH,&nbsp;Lisa A. Garberson PhD,&nbsp;Janessa M. Graves PhD","doi":"10.1111/jrh.70078","DOIUrl":"10.1111/jrh.70078","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Purpose</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>To compare the time and distance travel burden to access care for rural and urban Medicaid and commercially insured patients with opioid use disorder (OUD), and to understand where they travel for care.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>We used Medicaid and the Health Care Cost Institute commercial insurance administrative claims data from 2019 to examine the travel burden to health care for adults ages 18 years and older with OUD. We calculated the one-way driving distance and travel time between the enrollee's residence and the provider's location. We used the 2013 Urban Influence Codes (UIC) to classify enrollees as either urban (UIC 1–2) or rural (UIC 3–12) based on the patient's residence county.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Findings</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>The median distance traveled for a visit by a rural Medicaid or rural commercially insured enrollee was more than twice as far as their urban counterparts (rural Medicaid: 45.9 miles, urban Medicaid: 13.9 miles; rural commercially insured: 32.9 miles, urban commercially insured: 12.4 miles). When we imputed zeros for care provided in the same ZIP Code as an enrollee's residence, these differences persisted. Rural Medicaid enrollees carried the largest travel burden spending an average of more than 60 min traveling to care, about 30 min more than rural commercially insured enrollees. Urban enrollees, regardless of insurance type received almost all of their care in an urban location while rural Medicaid and commercially insured patients traveled to an urban location for about half their visits.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusions</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Rural and urban Medicaid and commercially insured enrollees experience different time and distance travel burdens.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":50060,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rural Health","volume":"41 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145187373","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Adverse childhood experiences and preventive health care among rural US children: A cross-sectional examination of 2022 National Health Interview Survey data 美国农村儿童的不良童年经历和预防性保健:对2022年全国健康访谈调查数据的横断面检查
IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Pub Date : 2025-09-28 DOI: 10.1111/jrh.70081
Mary Labuhn MPH, Andrew Williams MPH, PhD

Purpose

Rural-residing children have poor access to preventive health care due to geographic and socioeconomic issues, yet the role of adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) in preventive care for rural children has been understudied. It is hypothesized that among rural-residing children, those with ≥1 ACE will have lower utilization of preventive health care, with differences by sex.

Methods

Data for 425 (weighted n = 3,949,102) children (aged 9-17) residing in “nonmetropolitan” (2013 NCHS Urban-Rural Classification) were drawn from the 2022 National Health Interview Survey. Physician visit in the past 12 months (yes/no), dental visit in the past 12 months (yes/no), COVID-19, flu, and HPV vaccination (yes/no) were self-reported. Participants self-reported (yes/no) to 6 ACEs (high ACEs ≥1). Logistic regression estimated odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals for associations between ACEs and preventive health outcomes, adjusted for demographic and health care factors. This manuscript adheres to STROBE guidelines.

Findings

Children with ≥1 ACE were 81% more likely (OR = 1.81, 95% CI 1.04, 3.18) to receive a flu vaccination and 184% (OR = 2.84, 95% CI 1.66, 4.85) more likely to receive an HPV vaccination compared to children with 0 ACEs. No significant associations were found between ACEs and other preventive health care. Boys with ≥1 ACE had decreased odds (OR = 0.34, 95% CI 0.13, 0.94) of visiting a dentist, while girls with ≥1 ACE had increased odds (OR = 3.87, 95% CI 1.56, 9.60) of receiving an HPV vaccination.

Conclusions

Children with ≥1 ACE were more likely to receive a flu vaccination and HPV vaccination. The effect of ACEs on preventive health care may differ by sex among rural residents, yet additional research is warranted to inform prevention efforts in rural communities.

目的由于地理和社会经济问题,农村儿童难以获得预防性保健,但不良童年经历(ace)在农村儿童预防性保健中的作用尚未得到充分研究。假设在农村儿童中,ACE≥1的儿童对预防性保健的利用率较低,且存在性别差异。方法从2022年全国健康访谈调查中抽取425名(加权n = 3,949,102)名居住在“非大都市”(2013年NCHS城乡分类)的儿童(9-17岁)的数据。自我报告过去12个月的医生就诊(是/否)、过去12个月的牙科就诊(是/否)、COVID-19、流感和HPV疫苗接种(是/否)。参与者自我报告(是/否)至6个ace(高ace≥1)。经人口统计学和卫生保健因素调整后,Logistic回归估计了ace与预防性健康结果之间的比值比和95%置信区间。本手稿遵循STROBE指南。与无ACE的儿童相比,ACE≥1的儿童接受流感疫苗接种的可能性增加81% (OR = 1.81, 95% CI 1.04, 3.18), HPV疫苗接种的可能性增加184% (OR = 2.84, 95% CI 1.66, 4.85)。ace与其他预防性保健之间未发现显著关联。ACE≥1的男孩看牙医的几率降低(OR = 0.34, 95% CI 0.13, 0.94),而ACE≥1的女孩接受HPV疫苗接种的几率增加(OR = 3.87, 95% CI 1.56, 9.60)。结论:ACE≥1的儿童更有可能接种流感疫苗和HPV疫苗。在农村居民中,ace对预防保健的影响可能因性别而异,但需要进一步的研究来为农村社区的预防工作提供信息。
{"title":"Adverse childhood experiences and preventive health care among rural US children: A cross-sectional examination of 2022 National Health Interview Survey data","authors":"Mary Labuhn MPH,&nbsp;Andrew Williams MPH, PhD","doi":"10.1111/jrh.70081","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jrh.70081","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Purpose</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Rural-residing children have poor access to preventive health care due to geographic and socioeconomic issues, yet the role of adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) in preventive care for rural children has been understudied. It is hypothesized that among rural-residing children, those with ≥1 ACE will have lower utilization of preventive health care, with differences by sex.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Data for 425 (weighted n = 3,949,102) children (aged 9-17) residing in “nonmetropolitan” (2013 NCHS Urban-Rural Classification) were drawn from the 2022 National Health Interview Survey. Physician visit in the past 12 months (yes/no), dental visit in the past 12 months (yes/no), COVID-19, flu, and HPV vaccination (yes/no) were self-reported. Participants self-reported (yes/no) to 6 ACEs (high ACEs ≥1). Logistic regression estimated odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals for associations between ACEs and preventive health outcomes, adjusted for demographic and health care factors. This manuscript adheres to STROBE guidelines.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Findings</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Children with ≥1 ACE were 81% more likely (OR = 1.81, 95% CI 1.04, 3.18) to receive a flu vaccination and 184% (OR = 2.84, 95% CI 1.66, 4.85) more likely to receive an HPV vaccination compared to children with 0 ACEs. No significant associations were found between ACEs and other preventive health care. Boys with ≥1 ACE had decreased odds (OR = 0.34, 95% CI 0.13, 0.94) of visiting a dentist, while girls with ≥1 ACE had increased odds (OR = 3.87, 95% CI 1.56, 9.60) of receiving an HPV vaccination.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusions</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Children with ≥1 ACE were more likely to receive a flu vaccination and HPV vaccination. The effect of ACEs on preventive health care may differ by sex among rural residents, yet additional research is warranted to inform prevention efforts in rural communities.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":50060,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rural Health","volume":"41 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jrh.70081","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145181585","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Skill mix versus flexibility: Decoding nurse staffing impacts on critical access hospitals 技能组合与灵活性:解码护士人员配置对关键医院的影响
IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Pub Date : 2025-08-28 DOI: 10.1111/jrh.70075
Dinesh R. Pai PhD, Esmaeil Bahalkeh PhD

Objective

This study examines the effect of nurse staffing (skill mix and flexibility) on the financial sustainability, efficiency, and quality of care in Pennsylvania's critical access hospitals (CAHs) from 2000 to 2023.

Methods

This retrospective longitudinal study utilized unbalanced panel data from Pennsylvania's CAHs (n = 357 hospital-year observations). We employed 2-way fixed effects regression models to analyze the relationship between nurse staffing variables (skill mix and flexibility) and hospital performance outcomes (total margin, cost per adjusted discharge [CPAD], cost per adjusted patient day [CPPD], average length of stay [ALOS], and readmission index). We controlled for hospital-specific, socioeconomic, and demographic factors.

Results

A higher registered nurse (RN) skill mix significantly reduced log(winsorized(CPAD)) (β = −0.495, p<0.01) and log(ALOS) (β = −0.571, p<0.01), indicating improved cost efficiency and patient throughput. Increased nurse flexibility significantly increased log(ALOS) (β = 0.315, p<0.05) but reduced the readmission index (β = −0.895, p<0.01). No significant associations were found between skill mix and total margin, CPPD, or readmission index, nor between flexibility and financial metrics.

Discussion

A richer RN skill mix enhances efficiency by reducing costs and length of stay, while increased staffing flexibility reduces readmissions but extends ALOS. These findings emphasize the complex interplay between nurse staffing and CAH performance. Strategic management of RN skill mix and flexibility is crucial for optimizing resource use and improving patient outcomes in rural hospitals.

Conclusions

Policymakers and CAH administrators should strategically balance RN expertise and staffing flexibility to ensure both financial viability and clinical excellence in these essential rural health care institutions.

目的:本研究探讨2000年至2023年宾夕法尼亚州关键医院(CAHs)护士人员配置(技能组合和灵活性)对财务可持续性、效率和护理质量的影响。方法本回顾性纵向研究利用来自宾夕法尼亚州CAHs的非平衡面板数据(n = 357个医院年观察)。我们采用双向固定效应回归模型分析护士人员配置变量(技能组合和灵活性)与医院绩效结果(总利润、每次调整出院成本(CPAD)、每次调整病人日成本(CPPD)、平均住院时间(ALOS)和再入院指数)之间的关系。我们控制了医院特定因素、社会经济因素和人口因素。结果较高的注册护士(RN)技能组合显著降低了log(winsorized, CPAD) (β = - 0.495, p<0.01)和log(ALOS) (β = - 0.571, p<0.01),提高了成本效率和患者吞吐量。增加护士灵活性可显著提高log(ALOS) (β = 0.315, p<0.05),降低再入院指数(β = - 0.895, p<0.01)。没有发现技能组合与总边际、CPPD或再入院指数之间的显著关联,也没有发现灵活性和财务指标之间的显著关联。更丰富的注册护士技能组合通过减少成本和住院时间来提高效率,而增加的人员灵活性减少了再入院,但延长了ALOS。这些发现强调了护士人员配置与CAH绩效之间复杂的相互作用。战略管理护士的技能组合和灵活性是优化资源利用和改善农村医院病人的结果至关重要。结论决策者和CAH管理者应在战略上平衡注册护士专业知识和人员配置灵活性,以确保这些基本农村卫生保健机构的财务可行性和临床卓越性。
{"title":"Skill mix versus flexibility: Decoding nurse staffing impacts on critical access hospitals","authors":"Dinesh R. Pai PhD,&nbsp;Esmaeil Bahalkeh PhD","doi":"10.1111/jrh.70075","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jrh.70075","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Objective</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>This study examines the effect of nurse staffing (skill mix and flexibility) on the financial sustainability, efficiency, and quality of care in Pennsylvania's critical access hospitals (CAHs) from 2000 to 2023.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>This retrospective longitudinal study utilized unbalanced panel data from Pennsylvania's CAHs (n = 357 hospital-year observations). We employed 2-way fixed effects regression models to analyze the relationship between nurse staffing variables (skill mix and flexibility) and hospital performance outcomes (total margin, cost per adjusted discharge [CPAD], cost per adjusted patient day [CPPD], average length of stay [ALOS], and readmission index). We controlled for hospital-specific, socioeconomic, and demographic factors.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>A higher registered nurse (RN) skill mix significantly reduced log(winsorized(CPAD)) (<i>β</i> = −0.495, <i>p</i>&lt;0.01) and log(ALOS) (<i>β</i> = −0.571, <i>p</i>&lt;0.01), indicating improved cost efficiency and patient throughput. Increased nurse flexibility significantly increased log(ALOS) (<i>β</i> = 0.315, <i>p</i>&lt;0.05) but reduced the readmission index (<i>β</i> = −0.895, <i>p</i>&lt;0.01). No significant associations were found between skill mix and total margin, CPPD, or readmission index, nor between flexibility and financial metrics.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Discussion</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>A richer RN skill mix enhances efficiency by reducing costs and length of stay, while increased staffing flexibility reduces readmissions but extends ALOS. These findings emphasize the complex interplay between nurse staffing and CAH performance. Strategic management of RN skill mix and flexibility is crucial for optimizing resource use and improving patient outcomes in rural hospitals.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusions</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Policymakers and CAH administrators should strategically balance RN expertise and staffing flexibility to ensure both financial viability and clinical excellence in these essential rural health care institutions.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":50060,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rural Health","volume":"41 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jrh.70075","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144910186","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Rural and urban differences in treatment on demand for substance use treatment involving medications for opioid use disorder 城乡在涉及阿片类药物使用障碍药物的物质使用治疗需求方面的差异
IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Pub Date : 2025-08-25 DOI: 10.1111/jrh.70076
Ryan J. Lofaro PhD, Robert M. Bohler PhD, Robert Spurgeon BA, William A. Mase DrPH

Purpose

Research has found that the use of medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD) varies across the rural-urban divide; however, relationships between rurality, MOUD, and substance use treatment wait times remain underexplored. This study analyzes associations between rurality, MOUD usage, and immediate access to outpatient treatment—that is, “treatment on demand”—in the United States.

Methods

Using 2021-2022 Treatment Episode Data Set Admissions (TEDS-A) data on outpatient treatment centers, we employ logistic regression to analyze treatment on demand (0-day wait time) as the outcome and rurality as the key predictor in models disaggregated into patients who utilized MOUD at intake and those who did not. Analyses are also disaggregated by Census region and division of the country.

Findings

Results show that rurality reduces the odds of treatment on demand in both MOUD (OR = .513, P <.001) and non-MOUD (OR = .593, P <.001) models, with slightly stronger effects in the former. Associations with rurality vary substantially by region of the country. MOUD models in the Midwest, West, and South show rurality has a significant negative effect; these negative associations held for non-MOUD models only in the South. Further, differences across Census divisions highlight rurality's spatial disparities at a more granular level.

Conclusions

Understanding barriers to treatment on demand for evidence-based treatments is a crucial aspect of ensuring people who have opioid use disorder in rural regions receive the care they need. Policies should focus on increasing access to treatment to avoid delays while considering regional differences.

研究发现,阿片类药物使用障碍(mod)的药物使用在农村和城市之间存在差异;然而,农村、mod和药物使用治疗等待时间之间的关系仍未得到充分探讨。本研究分析了在美国农村地区、mod使用情况和立即获得门诊治疗(即“按需治疗”)之间的关系。方法使用门诊治疗中心的2021-2022年治疗事件数据集入院(TEDS-A)数据,我们采用logistic回归分析按需治疗(0天等待时间)作为结果,农村性作为模型的关键预测因素,并将模型分解为在入院时使用mod和未使用mod的患者。分析还按人口普查地区和国家划分进行了分类。结果显示,乡村性降低了mode (OR = .513, P <.001)和非mode (OR = .593, P <.001)模型中按需治疗的几率,前者的影响略强。与乡村性的联系在全国各地差别很大。中西部、西部和南部的模型显示乡村性具有显著的负向影响;这些负面关联仅在南方的非mod模式中成立。此外,人口普查部门之间的差异在更细粒度的层面上突出了农村的空间差异。了解循证治疗需求治疗的障碍是确保农村地区阿片类药物使用障碍患者获得所需护理的一个关键方面。政策应侧重于增加获得治疗的机会,以避免延误,同时考虑到区域差异。
{"title":"Rural and urban differences in treatment on demand for substance use treatment involving medications for opioid use disorder","authors":"Ryan J. Lofaro PhD,&nbsp;Robert M. Bohler PhD,&nbsp;Robert Spurgeon BA,&nbsp;William A. Mase DrPH","doi":"10.1111/jrh.70076","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jrh.70076","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Purpose</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Research has found that the use of medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD) varies across the rural-urban divide; however, relationships between rurality, MOUD, and substance use treatment wait times remain underexplored. This study analyzes associations between rurality, MOUD usage, and immediate access to outpatient treatment—that is, “treatment on demand”—in the United States.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Using 2021-2022 Treatment Episode Data Set Admissions (TEDS-A) data on outpatient treatment centers, we employ logistic regression to analyze treatment on demand (0-day wait time) as the outcome and rurality as the key predictor in models disaggregated into patients who utilized MOUD at intake and those who did not. Analyses are also disaggregated by Census region and division of the country.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Findings</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Results show that rurality reduces the odds of treatment on demand in both MOUD (OR = .513, <i>P</i> &lt;.001) and non-MOUD (OR = .593, <i>P</i> &lt;.001) models, with slightly stronger effects in the former. Associations with rurality vary substantially by region of the country. MOUD models in the Midwest, West, and South show rurality has a significant negative effect; these negative associations held for non-MOUD models only in the South. Further, differences across Census divisions highlight rurality's spatial disparities at a more granular level.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusions</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Understanding barriers to treatment on demand for evidence-based treatments is a crucial aspect of ensuring people who have opioid use disorder in rural regions receive the care they need. Policies should focus on increasing access to treatment to avoid delays while considering regional differences.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":50060,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rural Health","volume":"41 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144897593","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Trends in mental health care utilization in rural and nonrural areas, 2019-2023 2019-2023年农村和非农村地区精神卫生保健利用趋势
IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Pub Date : 2025-08-23 DOI: 10.1111/jrh.70074
Bryce J. Stanley PhD

Purpose

The recent increase in mental health care providers offering telehealth may improve access by reducing travel costs, particularly for those in rural areas. This paper seeks to understand how mental health care utilization changed from 2019 to 2023 for rural and nonrural areas.

Methods

This study uses data from the National Health Interview Survey for 2019 and 2021-2023 (n = 118,652). To adjust the utilization rates for sociodemographic factors, a probit model with survey weights is used. For each year, the adjusted percentage of rural and nonrural populations receiving any mental health care in the past year is reported. Changes in demographic characteristics of those receiving care are also discussed.

Findings

This study finds that both rural and nonrural populations experienced large increases in adjusted mental health care utilization rates from 2019 to 2023. Utilization rates in rural areas grew 3.72 percentage points, from 9.35% (95% CI: 8.85-9.84) in 2019 to 13.07% (95% CI: 12.86-13.28) in 2023. For nonrural areas, utilization rates increased 4.40 percentage points, from 12.06% (95% CI: 11.79-12.74) in 2019 to 16.46% (95% CI: 15.82-17.11) in 2023.

Conclusion

Rural populations utilize less mental health care than nonrural populations, but both saw a substantial increase from 2019 to 2023. While telehealth may particularly benefit rural areas, these data suggest a larger increase in utilization for nonrural respondents. Future work is needed to better understand remote mental health care and rural populations.

目的最近提供远程医疗服务的精神卫生保健提供者的增加可以通过降低旅行费用,特别是农村地区的旅行费用,改善获得远程医疗服务的机会。本文旨在了解2019 - 2023年农村和非农村地区精神卫生保健利用的变化情况。方法本研究使用2019年和2021-2023年全国健康访谈调查数据(n = 118,652)。为了调整社会人口因素的利用率,使用了带有调查权重的概率模型。每年报告过去一年接受任何精神保健的农村和非农村人口的调整后百分比。还讨论了接受护理者人口统计学特征的变化。本研究发现,2019年至2023年,农村和非农村人口的调整后精神卫生保健使用率均大幅上升。农村地区的利用率增长了3.72个百分点,从2019年的9.35% (95% CI: 8.85-9.84)增长到2023年的13.07% (95% CI: 12.86-13.28)。在非农村地区,利用率提高了4.40个百分点,从2019年的12.06% (95% CI: 11.79-12.74)提高到2023年的16.46% (95% CI: 15.82-17.11)。结论农村人口的精神卫生保健使用率低于非农村人口,但从2019年到2023年,农村人口和非农村人口的精神卫生保健使用率均大幅上升。虽然远程保健可能特别有利于农村地区,但这些数据表明,非农村应答者利用远程保健的比例有较大提高。未来的工作需要更好地了解偏远地区的精神卫生保健和农村人口。
{"title":"Trends in mental health care utilization in rural and nonrural areas, 2019-2023","authors":"Bryce J. Stanley PhD","doi":"10.1111/jrh.70074","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jrh.70074","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Purpose</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>The recent increase in mental health care providers offering telehealth may improve access by reducing travel costs, particularly for those in rural areas. This paper seeks to understand how mental health care utilization changed from 2019 to 2023 for rural and nonrural areas.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>This study uses data from the National Health Interview Survey for 2019 and 2021-2023 (n = 118,652). To adjust the utilization rates for sociodemographic factors, a probit model with survey weights is used. For each year, the adjusted percentage of rural and nonrural populations receiving any mental health care in the past year is reported. Changes in demographic characteristics of those receiving care are also discussed.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Findings</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>This study finds that both rural and nonrural populations experienced large increases in adjusted mental health care utilization rates from 2019 to 2023. Utilization rates in rural areas grew 3.72 percentage points, from 9.35% (95% CI: 8.85-9.84) in 2019 to 13.07% (95% CI: 12.86-13.28) in 2023. For nonrural areas, utilization rates increased 4.40 percentage points, from 12.06% (95% CI: 11.79-12.74) in 2019 to 16.46% (95% CI: 15.82-17.11) in 2023.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusion</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Rural populations utilize less mental health care than nonrural populations, but both saw a substantial increase from 2019 to 2023. While telehealth may particularly benefit rural areas, these data suggest a larger increase in utilization for nonrural respondents. Future work is needed to better understand remote mental health care and rural populations.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":50060,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rural Health","volume":"41 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jrh.70074","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144891600","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Journal of Rural Health
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1