Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery最新文献

The 5-factor modified Frailty Index (mFI-5) is a risk-stratification tool utilized to predict complications and mortality following major lower extremity (LE) amputation. However, its prognostic value for long-term mortality is unknown. The study aim was to assess whether a high mFI-5 score relates to long-term mortality following major LE amputation for chronic wounds. Patients ≥60 years who underwent major LE amputation from 2017 to 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. Data regarding demographics, comorbidities, perioperative factors, amputation type, and postoperative complications was collected and mFI-5 was calculated. Survival analysis was performed with Kaplan-Meier curves and differences were assessed with Log-Rank test. A total of 172 patients were identified. Mean age was 70.7 ± 8.0 years. Median time to ambulation was 3.7 months (IQR 4.0). By final follow-up of 17.5 ± 15.9 months, ambulatory rate was 51.7% (n = 89), overall mortality 36.0% (n = 62), 1-year mortality 14.0% (n = 24), and 3-year mortality 27.9% (n = 48). Patients with an mFI-5 of ≥4 (26.7%, n = 46) compared with patients with mFI-5 <4 (73.3%, n = 126) had a higher rate of prolonged postoperative LOS (34.8% vs 19.8%, p = .042), overall mortality (52.2% vs 30.2%, p = .008), 1-year mortality (23.9% vs 10.3%, p = .023), and 3-year mortality (45.7% vs 21.4%, p = .002). Multivariate analysis demonstrated mFI-5 was an independent predictor of 3-year mortality (OR 2.35, p = .043). At a threshold ≥4, the mFI-5 demonstrated utility in predicting long-term mortality. The value of this prognostic indicator is in its preoperative application of assessing risk of mortality, which should be utilized in conjunction with other measures.

Considerable resources are dedicated on an annual basis to the podiatric medicine and surgery residency interview by both students and programs. Despite this, relatively little is known about student perception of the process, nor the format and content of interview. The objective of this investigation was to study and organize experiences of fourth-year podiatric medical students following the 2024 Centralized Residency Interview Program (CRIP) process. An anonymous and voluntary survey was developed and made available to fourth year podiatric medical students. It was relatively common for there to be academic, social/personal, case work-up, and rapid-fire academic question components to the interview. It was also very common to be provided with the opportunity to ask programs questions. It was relatively uncommon for there to be ethical/moral questions, personality/psychologic assessments, logic assessments, and hands-on demonstrations. The most common hands-on demonstrations were suturing, hand ties and performance of fixation principles. Relatively high yield academic topics included plain film radiography interpretation, rearfoot/ankle osseous trauma, diabetic foot infection, advanced imaging interpretation, and fixation constructs/principles. When evaluating programs, students placed high value on surgical volume, surgical variety, relative resident autonomy, program location, exposure to outpatient clinics, salary, future connections as a program alumnus, unique off-service rotations, exposure to business management/coding/billing, scope of practice, exposure to inpatient management, resident salary, and who the senior co-residents would be. The results of this investigation provide unique information for both medical students and residency programs with respect to the perception, format and content of the podiatric residency interview process.

Different aspects of the learning curve in total ankle replacement (TAR) have been studied in the short to mid-term, with 30 cases often considered critical. However, its impact on long-term (10- and 15-year) survival remains unclear. Therefore, we retrospectively analyzed 77 consecutive TARs performed by one orthopedic surgeon. The main outcome was long-term survival between cases 1-30 and 31-77 using the Kaplan-Meier with Competing Risk Analyses. Secondarily, we used Moving Average Method with LOESS regression to confirm the learning curve based on the perioperative complications. Thirdly, associations between perioperative complications and operation time on long-term survival were assessed using Cox proportional hazard models. The 10-year survival of cases 1-30 was 89.9% (95% CI 70.4-96.5), and of 31-77, 92.4% (95% CI 7745- 97.5) (p = .58). The 15-year survival was 81.8% (95% CI 59.5-91.8) and 74.8% (95% CI 52.4-86.6), respectively (p = .97). The long-term survival rate for the TAR that endured perioperative complication was 96.70% (95% CI 90.28-103.12), and for the uncomplicated TAR 87.50% (95% CI 77.12-97.88%) (p = .24). Operating time nor occurrence of perioperative fractures were significantly associated with long-term survival (p = .11 and 0.26, respectively). However, moving average method revealed a significant decreasing trend with a cut-off value of 33 procedures regarding the marginal probability of perioperative osseous complications (p < .01). In conclusion, surgeons should note a learning curve when adapting arthroplasty procedures. After the prosthesis design switch, the learning curve regarding perioperative osseous complications was confirmed at 33 TAR. The switch did not affect long-term survival.

Surgical methods for lateral ray polydactyly with brachydactyly of the foot include simple toe ablation and toe lengthening. However, there are few reports on comparative studies, and there is no standard treatment. We retrospectively investigated cases of lateral ray polydactyly with brachydactyly treated at our department and related facilities. In our study, the prevalence of Hirai-Togashi classification type IV was 8.8% (13/147 toes). Five patients did not request toe lengthening and underwent simple ablation, resulting in a shortened remaining toe in these 5 patients. The surgical methods for toe lengthening were pedicle bone grafting in 2 cases and on-top formation in 6 cases. Good results can be obtained in the most common phalangeal type cases, but care must be taken in cases with block-shaped metatarsal heads to avoid poor toe alignment.