首页 > 最新文献

Journal of Engineering Education最新文献

英文 中文
Exploring engagement narratives among self-identified Hispanic women's experiences in engineering counterspaces 探索自我认同的西班牙裔女性在工程柜台空间的经历中的参与叙事
IF 3.9 2区 工程技术 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2025-02-13 DOI: 10.1002/jee.20630
Madeline Polmear, Elizabeth Volpe, Idalis Villanueva Alarcón, Denise R. Simmons

Background

Diversity, equity, and inclusion efforts in higher education are increasingly recognizing the importance of understanding students' lived experience. More research is needed to deeply and contextually uncover voices, meanings, and stories that are enveloped within the complex realities of Hispanic women in engineering.

Purpose

While the Latiné/x/a/o, Hispanic women population is one of the fastest growing ethnic groups in the United States, they receive only 3% of engineering undergraduate degrees. This research explored how self-identified Hispanic women experienced engagement outside of class.

Design/Method

This exploratory qualitative research employed narrative inquiry design using a paradigmatic analysis method. We conducted two in-depth interviews with five undergraduate engineering students who self-identified as international Hispanic women.

Findings

By examining the narratives through a novel synthesis of a socio-ecological framework of engagement and community cultural wealth, we identified three themes that tell the story of students' experiences outside of class: (i) Perceived benefits and level of involvement informed student dispositions and aspirational capital in counterspaces; (ii) Linguistic capital served as the entry point for receiving social and navigational capital; and (iii) Cultural and linguistic similarities provide a counterspace where students gained the drive, disposition, and aspiration to persist in engineering.

Conclusions

The findings identified the capital that drove students to engage outside of the classroom and capital they gained in return. Out-of-class activities provided a counterspace for Hispanic women in engineering that supported their sense of belonging, ability to navigate engineering, and professional development. Based on these findings, we provide recommendations for engineering education and research.

高等教育的多样性、公平性和包容性越来越多地认识到理解学生生活经历的重要性。需要更多的研究来深入和背景地揭示隐藏在西班牙裔工程女性复杂现实中的声音、意义和故事。虽然拉丁裔/x/a/o,西班牙裔女性人口是美国增长最快的族群之一,但她们只获得3%的工程本科学位。这项研究探讨了自我认同的西班牙裔女性如何体验课外活动。设计/方法本探索性质的研究采用叙事探究设计和范式分析法。我们对五名自称为国际西班牙裔女性的工科本科生进行了两次深度访谈。通过对参与和社区文化财富的社会生态框架的新颖综合来检查叙述,我们确定了三个主题,讲述了学生课堂外经历的故事:(i)感知利益和参与水平告知了学生在counterspaces的倾向和抱负资本;语言资本是获得社会和航海资本的切入点;(三)文化和语言的相似性为学生获得坚持工程的动力、性格和愿望提供了一个抗衡空间。研究结果确定了驱使学生参与课堂外活动的资本,以及他们从中获得的资本。课外活动为西班牙裔女性在工程领域提供了一个抗衡空间,支持了她们的归属感、驾驭工程的能力和专业发展。基于这些发现,我们提出了工程教育和研究的建议。
{"title":"Exploring engagement narratives among self-identified Hispanic women's experiences in engineering counterspaces","authors":"Madeline Polmear,&nbsp;Elizabeth Volpe,&nbsp;Idalis Villanueva Alarcón,&nbsp;Denise R. Simmons","doi":"10.1002/jee.20630","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20630","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Background</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Diversity, equity, and inclusion efforts in higher education are increasingly recognizing the importance of understanding students' lived experience. More research is needed to deeply and contextually uncover voices, meanings, and stories that are enveloped within the complex realities of Hispanic women in engineering.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Purpose</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>While the Latiné/x/a/o, Hispanic women population is one of the fastest growing ethnic groups in the United States, they receive only 3% of engineering undergraduate degrees. This research explored how self-identified Hispanic women experienced engagement outside of class.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Design/Method</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>This exploratory qualitative research employed narrative inquiry design using a paradigmatic analysis method. We conducted two in-depth interviews with five undergraduate engineering students who self-identified as international Hispanic women.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Findings</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>By examining the narratives through a novel synthesis of a socio-ecological framework of engagement and community cultural wealth, we identified three themes that tell the story of students' experiences outside of class: (i) Perceived benefits and level of involvement informed student dispositions and aspirational capital in counterspaces; (ii) Linguistic capital served as the entry point for receiving social and navigational capital; and (iii) Cultural and linguistic similarities provide a counterspace where students gained the drive, disposition, and aspiration to persist in engineering.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusions</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>The findings identified the capital that drove students to engage outside of the classroom and capital they gained in return. Out-of-class activities provided a counterspace for Hispanic women in engineering that supported their sense of belonging, ability to navigate engineering, and professional development. Based on these findings, we provide recommendations for engineering education and research.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":50206,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Engineering Education","volume":"114 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2025-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jee.20630","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143404531","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Supporting engineering students' representational competencies in individual and collaborative learning settings 支持工科学生在个人和合作学习环境中的代表性能力
IF 3.9 2区 工程技术 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2025-02-13 DOI: 10.1002/jee.20631
Jihyun Rho, Martina A. Rau, Barry Van Veen

Background

Visual representations are pervasive in electrical engineering instruction in various instructional settings. Further, electrical engineering instruction often requires students to extend simple visual representations to learn about more complex visualization in subsequent instruction. Yet, students often struggle to understand visualizations. An open question is whether supporting students' understanding of visual representations enhances their subsequent learning. We investigate this question in both individual and collaborative learning settings.

Purpose

We investigated the impact of support for students' understanding of simple visual representations on students' learning of subsequently presented complex visual representations. Further, we investigated whether students' level of mental rotation skills moderates the impact of such instructional support.

Method

Two experiments tested the impact of instructional support for visual representations in an individual or a collaborative learning setting. Students were randomly assigned to receive different versions of instructional support, or none.

Results

Study 1 was conducted in an individual learning setting. While students with high mental rotation skills benefited from the instructional support, students with low mental rotation skills did not benefit. Study 2 was conducted in a collaborative learning setting. Here, all students benefited equally from the support.

Conclusions

Our findings suggest that instructional support for simple visual representations can enhance students' subsequent learning with complex visual representations. Further, our findings suggest that a collaborative learning setting may be particularly beneficial to students with low mental rotation skills. This study contributes to an understanding of instructional environments that can improve learning with visual representations in engineering education.

视觉表征在电气工程教学中普遍存在于各种教学环境中。此外,电气工程教学通常要求学生扩展简单的可视化表示,以便在随后的教学中学习更复杂的可视化。然而,学生们常常难以理解可视化。一个悬而未决的问题是,支持学生对视觉表征的理解是否能促进他们随后的学习。我们在个人和合作学习环境中调查了这个问题。目的研究支持学生理解简单视觉表征对学生随后呈现的复杂视觉表征学习的影响。进一步,我们调查了学生的心理旋转技能水平是否调节了这种教学支持的影响。方法两个实验测试了教学支持在个体学习和协作学习环境下对视觉表征的影响。学生们被随机分配接受不同版本的教学支持,或者没有。研究1是在个体学习环境下进行的。心理旋转技能高的学生从教学支持中受益,而心理旋转技能低的学生则没有受益。研究2在协作学习环境中进行。在这里,所有学生都平等地受益于这种支持。结论简单视觉表征的教学支持有助于提高学生对复杂视觉表征的后续学习。此外,我们的研究结果表明,协作学习环境可能对心理旋转技能较低的学生特别有益。本研究有助于了解在工程教育中,如何透过视觉呈现来改善学习。
{"title":"Supporting engineering students' representational competencies in individual and collaborative learning settings","authors":"Jihyun Rho,&nbsp;Martina A. Rau,&nbsp;Barry Van Veen","doi":"10.1002/jee.20631","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20631","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Background</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Visual representations are pervasive in electrical engineering instruction in various instructional settings. Further, electrical engineering instruction often requires students to extend simple visual representations to learn about more complex visualization in subsequent instruction. Yet, students often struggle to understand visualizations. An open question is whether supporting students' understanding of visual representations enhances their subsequent learning. We investigate this question in both individual and collaborative learning settings.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Purpose</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>We investigated the impact of support for students' understanding of simple visual representations on students' learning of subsequently presented complex visual representations. Further, we investigated whether students' level of mental rotation skills moderates the impact of such instructional support.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Method</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Two experiments tested the impact of instructional support for visual representations in an individual or a collaborative learning setting. Students were randomly assigned to receive different versions of instructional support, or none.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Study 1 was conducted in an individual learning setting. While students with high mental rotation skills benefited from the instructional support, students with low mental rotation skills did not benefit. Study 2 was conducted in a collaborative learning setting. Here, all students benefited equally from the support.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusions</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Our findings suggest that instructional support for simple visual representations can enhance students' subsequent learning with complex visual representations. Further, our findings suggest that a collaborative learning setting may be particularly beneficial to students with low mental rotation skills. This study contributes to an understanding of instructional environments that can improve learning with visual representations in engineering education.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":50206,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Engineering Education","volume":"114 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2025-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jee.20631","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143404532","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Mental health and treatment use in undergraduate engineering students: A comparative analysis to students in other academic fields of study 工科本科学生的心理健康与治疗:与其他学术领域学生的比较分析
IF 3.9 2区 工程技术 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2025-01-28 DOI: 10.1002/jee.20629
Matthew D. Whitwer, Sarah A. Wilson, Joseph H. Hammer, Brenna Gomer

Background

Engineering students experience high levels of distress and low rates of mental health treatment seeking, yet there is a gap in knowledge around how this compares with that of students in other fields of study. Given the influence of social identity (e.g., gender identity, race/ethnicity) on mental health and treatment seeking, it is important to account for sociodemographic variation across fields when performing such comparisons.

Purpose

This study used Andersen's Behavioral Model to compare mental health distress and treatment use between students in engineering and other fields while controlling for sociodemographic factors.

Methods

Survey data came from the 2021–2022 Healthy Minds Study (N > 50,000). Measures related to mental health, treatment use, and diagnosis were examined. Descriptive statistics were determined for each field of study, and regression analyses were used to assess differences across fields while accounting for covariates.

Results

Compared to students from other fields, engineering students were among the least likely to report symptoms of depression and anxiety. However, 44.4% of undergraduate engineering students screened positive for current depression and/or anxiety. Of those who screened positive, only 40.4% had received therapy/counseling in the past year. Further, they were the least likely to have received a depression or anxiety diagnosis when compared to students from other fields.

Conclusion

When controlling for sociodemographic factors, undergraduate engineering students reported lower rates of mental health distress and treatment use compared to students in other fields. This study highlights the need for considering engineering culture in the interpretation of student mental health and treatment.

工程专业的学生经历了高水平的痛苦,寻求心理健康治疗的比例很低,但与其他学习领域的学生相比,这方面的知识存在差距。鉴于社会认同(如性别认同、种族/族裔)对心理健康和寻求治疗的影响,在进行这种比较时,必须考虑到不同领域的社会人口差异。目的本研究在控制社会人口学因素的情况下,采用Andersen行为模型比较工科学生和其他专业学生的心理健康困扰和治疗情况。方法调查数据来自2021-2022年健康心理研究(N > 50,000)。对与心理健康、治疗使用和诊断有关的措施进行了检查。对每个研究领域进行描述性统计,并使用回归分析来评估各领域之间的差异,同时考虑协变量。结果与其他专业的学生相比,工科学生是最不可能出现抑郁和焦虑症状的学生之一。然而,44.4%的本科工程专业学生目前的抑郁和/或焦虑筛查呈阳性。在筛检呈阳性的人士中,只有40.4%在过去一年曾接受治疗/谘询。此外,与其他领域的学生相比,他们最不可能被诊断出患有抑郁症或焦虑症。结论在控制社会人口因素的情况下,与其他专业的学生相比,工科本科学生的心理健康困扰率和治疗使用率较低。本研究强调了在解释学生心理健康和治疗时考虑工程文化的必要性。
{"title":"Mental health and treatment use in undergraduate engineering students: A comparative analysis to students in other academic fields of study","authors":"Matthew D. Whitwer,&nbsp;Sarah A. Wilson,&nbsp;Joseph H. Hammer,&nbsp;Brenna Gomer","doi":"10.1002/jee.20629","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20629","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Background</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Engineering students experience high levels of distress and low rates of mental health treatment seeking, yet there is a gap in knowledge around how this compares with that of students in other fields of study. Given the influence of social identity (e.g., gender identity, race/ethnicity) on mental health and treatment seeking, it is important to account for sociodemographic variation across fields when performing such comparisons.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Purpose</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>This study used Andersen's Behavioral Model to compare mental health distress and treatment use between students in engineering and other fields while controlling for sociodemographic factors.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Survey data came from the 2021–2022 Healthy Minds Study (<i>N</i> &gt; 50,000). Measures related to mental health, treatment use, and diagnosis were examined. Descriptive statistics were determined for each field of study, and regression analyses were used to assess differences across fields while accounting for covariates.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Compared to students from other fields, engineering students were among the least likely to report symptoms of depression and anxiety. However, 44.4% of undergraduate engineering students screened positive for current depression and/or anxiety. Of those who screened positive, only 40.4% had received therapy/counseling in the past year. Further, they were the least likely to have received a depression or anxiety diagnosis when compared to students from other fields.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusion</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>When controlling for sociodemographic factors, undergraduate engineering students reported lower rates of mental health distress and treatment use compared to students in other fields. This study highlights the need for considering engineering culture in the interpretation of student mental health and treatment.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":50206,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Engineering Education","volume":"114 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2025-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jee.20629","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143120495","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A systematic review of differences for disabled students in STEM versus other disciplinary undergraduate settings 对STEM与其他学科本科设置中残疾学生差异的系统回顾
IF 3.9 2区 工程技术 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2025-01-08 DOI: 10.1002/jee.20627
Ariel Chasen, Maura Borrego, Elisa Koolman, Emily Landgren, Hannah Chapman Tripp

Background

Engineering education and other discipline-based education researchers may motivate their work with claims that STEM (science, technology, engineering, and mathematics) norms and culture are unique, thus requiring focused study. As research on disabled students gains momentum in engineering education, it is important to understand differences that limit generalizability of prior work in other disciplines to STEM.

Purpose

What do studies document as differences between STEM and non-STEM settings that impact disabled undergraduates, and to what extent are these studies using asset-based perspectives of disability?

Scope/Method

This systematic review identified US studies that compared STEM to non-STEM disciplines in regards to disabled undergraduate students. The qualifying studies, published during 1979–2023, comprise 22 journal articles and 15 doctoral or master's theses. Most studies used quantitative methods (n = 28).

Results

Of the 37 qualifying studies, 20 instructor studies provided moderate evidence that STEM instructors are less willing or less knowledgeable about how to support disabled students through accommodations or course design. We highlight a small number of student studies identifying assets of disabled students, although most took a deficit view by comparing disabled student experiences to an able-bodied norm. Few studies emphasized the structural characteristics of STEM such as culture and educational practices that contribute to socially constructing disability by acting as barriers that disable students.

Conclusions

More work is needed to examine instructor actions beyond their intentions and attitudes toward disabled students. Critical and asset-based perspectives are needed in future study designs that center disability to uncover systemic barriers and identify assets disabled students bring to STEM.

工程教育和其他基于学科的教育研究人员可能会声称STEM(科学、技术、工程和数学)规范和文化是独特的,因此需要重点研究,以此来激励他们的工作。随着对残疾学生的研究在工程教育中获得动力,重要的是要了解限制其他学科先前工作推广到STEM的差异。研究记录了影响残疾本科生的STEM和非STEM环境之间的哪些差异,这些研究在多大程度上使用了基于资产的残疾视角?范围/方法本系统综述确定了在残疾本科生方面比较STEM和非STEM学科的美国研究。这些合格的研究发表于1979-2023年间,包括22篇期刊论文和15篇博士或硕士论文。大多数研究采用定量方法(n = 28)。在37项合格的研究中,20项教师研究提供了适度的证据,表明STEM教师不太愿意或不太了解如何通过住宿或课程设计来支持残疾学生。我们强调了少数确定残疾学生资产的学生研究,尽管大多数通过将残疾学生的经历与健全的标准进行比较而采取了缺陷观点。很少有研究强调STEM的结构特征,如文化和教育实践,通过充当残疾学生的障碍,有助于社会构建残疾。结论需要更多的工作来检查教师的行为,而不是他们对残疾学生的意图和态度。在未来的研究设计中,需要以残疾为中心的批判性和基于资产的视角,以发现系统性障碍,并识别残疾学生为STEM带来的资产。
{"title":"A systematic review of differences for disabled students in STEM versus other disciplinary undergraduate settings","authors":"Ariel Chasen,&nbsp;Maura Borrego,&nbsp;Elisa Koolman,&nbsp;Emily Landgren,&nbsp;Hannah Chapman Tripp","doi":"10.1002/jee.20627","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20627","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Background</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Engineering education and other discipline-based education researchers may motivate their work with claims that STEM (science, technology, engineering, and mathematics) norms and culture are unique, thus requiring focused study. As research on disabled students gains momentum in engineering education, it is important to understand differences that limit generalizability of prior work in other disciplines to STEM.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Purpose</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>What do studies document as differences between STEM and non-STEM settings that impact disabled undergraduates, and to what extent are these studies using asset-based perspectives of disability?</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Scope/Method</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>This systematic review identified US studies that compared STEM to non-STEM disciplines in regards to disabled undergraduate students. The qualifying studies, published during 1979–2023, comprise 22 journal articles and 15 doctoral or master's theses. Most studies used quantitative methods (<i>n</i> = 28).</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Of the 37 qualifying studies, 20 instructor studies provided moderate evidence that STEM instructors are less willing or less knowledgeable about how to support disabled students through accommodations or course design. We highlight a small number of student studies identifying assets of disabled students, although most took a deficit view by comparing disabled student experiences to an able-bodied norm. Few studies emphasized the structural characteristics of STEM such as culture and educational practices that contribute to socially constructing disability by acting as barriers that disable students.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusions</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>More work is needed to examine instructor actions beyond their intentions and attitudes toward disabled students. Critical and asset-based perspectives are needed in future study designs that center disability to uncover systemic barriers and identify assets disabled students bring to STEM.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":50206,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Engineering Education","volume":"114 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2025-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jee.20627","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143113049","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Promoting sociotechnical perspectives of engineering during a summer bridge program 在夏季桥梁项目中促进工程的社会技术观点
IF 3.9 2区 工程技术 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2024-12-28 DOI: 10.1002/jee.20626
Jacob Pleasants, Richard Velasco, Claudia Colonnello, Shansley Glenn, Samuel Crapitto, Kate Raymond, Brandon Abbott

Background

To address complex challenges of modern society, engineering education needs to help students develop sociotechnical perspectives of engineering. Research has documented efforts to incorporate sociotechnical thinking into undergraduate engineering education, but those perspectives must often compete with more dominant technocentric views. Research is needed to investigate how and why students do or do not adopt sociotechnical views.

Purpose/Hypothesis(es)

In this study, we investigated the extent to which students' views of engineering changed in the context of an Engineering Summer Bridge (ESB) program, in which engineering is promoted as a socially engaged practice.

Design/Method

We used a multiple case study methodology to investigate patterns across 24 ESB participants. We gathered multiple sources of data to investigate changes in participants' thinking, including pre/post surveys, weekly reflections during ESB, and follow-up participant interviews. We grouped participants based on the extent to which they added socially engaged perspectives to their perceptions of engineering. We then identified variables associated with those groupings.

Results

Approximately one-third of participants added socially engaged perspectives to their views of engineering. These students tended to have fewer prior engineering experiences prior to ESB and often self-identified as having limited prior knowledge of engineering. They were also more likely to hold motivations and interests oriented toward the public good.

Conclusions

Our study identifies variables that potentially support and inhibit students' development of socially engaged views of engineering. It highlights the importance of early learning experiences and suggests that technocentric perspectives can be well established even before students begin their undergraduate programs.

为了应对现代社会的复杂挑战,工程教育需要帮助学生发展工程的社会技术视角。研究记录了将社会技术思维纳入本科工程教育的努力,但这些观点必须经常与更主流的技术中心观点竞争。需要进行研究,以调查学生如何以及为什么采用或不采用社会技术观点。目的/假设:在本研究中,我们调查了在工程暑期桥(ESB)项目背景下,学生对工程的看法发生了多大程度的变化,在该项目中,工程被作为一种社会参与的实践来推广。设计/方法我们使用多案例研究方法来研究24个ESB参与者的模式。我们收集了多个数据源来调查参与者思维的变化,包括前后调查、ESB期间的每周反思和后续参与者访谈。我们根据他们在工程认知中加入社会参与视角的程度对参与者进行分组。然后,我们确定了与这些分组相关的变量。结果:大约三分之一的参与者在他们的工程观点中加入了社会参与的观点。这些学生倾向于在ESB之前拥有较少的工程经验,并且经常自认为拥有有限的工程知识。他们也更有可能拥有面向公共利益的动机和兴趣。我们的研究确定了可能支持和抑制学生社会参与工程观点发展的变量。它强调了早期学习经验的重要性,并建议甚至在学生开始他们的本科课程之前就可以很好地建立以技术为中心的观点。
{"title":"Promoting sociotechnical perspectives of engineering during a summer bridge program","authors":"Jacob Pleasants,&nbsp;Richard Velasco,&nbsp;Claudia Colonnello,&nbsp;Shansley Glenn,&nbsp;Samuel Crapitto,&nbsp;Kate Raymond,&nbsp;Brandon Abbott","doi":"10.1002/jee.20626","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20626","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Background</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>To address complex challenges of modern society, engineering education needs to help students develop sociotechnical perspectives of engineering. Research has documented efforts to incorporate sociotechnical thinking into undergraduate engineering education, but those perspectives must often compete with more dominant technocentric views. Research is needed to investigate how and why students do or do not adopt sociotechnical views.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Purpose/Hypothesis(es)</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>In this study, we investigated the extent to which students' views of engineering changed in the context of an Engineering Summer Bridge (ESB) program, in which engineering is promoted as a socially engaged practice.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Design/Method</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>We used a multiple case study methodology to investigate patterns across 24 ESB participants. We gathered multiple sources of data to investigate changes in participants' thinking, including pre/post surveys, weekly reflections during ESB, and follow-up participant interviews. We grouped participants based on the extent to which they added socially engaged perspectives to their perceptions of engineering. We then identified variables associated with those groupings.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Approximately one-third of participants added socially engaged perspectives to their views of engineering. These students tended to have fewer prior engineering experiences prior to ESB and often self-identified as having limited prior knowledge of engineering. They were also more likely to hold motivations and interests oriented toward the public good.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusions</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Our study identifies variables that potentially support and inhibit students' development of socially engaged views of engineering. It highlights the importance of early learning experiences and suggests that technocentric perspectives can be well established even before students begin their undergraduate programs.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":50206,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Engineering Education","volume":"114 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2024-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143120152","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Elements of disenchantment: Exploring the development of academic disenchantment among US engineering graduate students 迷失的要素:探索美国工程学研究生的学术失意发展历程
IF 3.9 2区 工程技术 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2024-12-19 DOI: 10.1002/jee.20624
Kanembe Shanachilubwa, Gabriella Sallai, Catherine G. P. Berdanier

Background

Given high attrition rates and lack of interest in faculty careers, it is crucial to understand how doctoral engineering students conceptualize academia and academic careers.

Purpose/Hypothesis

This study aims to characterize the development of academic disenchantment among engineering students who have considered departure from their doctoral programs. Schema theory was used to explore how students develop and evolve in their conceptualizations of academia through their lived experiences.

Design/Method

Data were collected from 42 graduate students from research-intensive universities across the United States who participated in qualitative, semi-structured interviews investigating expectations for graduate school, experiences, attrition and persistence considerations, and career trajectories. The transcripts were thematically analyzed through open and axial coding to understand how students constructed their schemas of the academy.

Findings

Experiences and quotations of four participants are presented to describe the results of the transcripts. Participants' misaligned expectations of their graduate program's values and practices, coupled with a lack of agency and support, led them to see their graduate programs as antagonistic to their short- and long-term career success. Even for students who may likely persist through to PhD degree completion, the development of disenchantment dissuades students—even those who once desired a faculty career—from interest in the academy.

Conclusions

By understanding how disenchantment arose in our participants' experiences, we better understand how to equip students with resources that will help them navigate graduate programs. This research advances the literature by identifying underutilized opportunities to prepare students to cope with the challenges of engineering doctoral education.

背景 鉴于自然减员率高以及对教师职业缺乏兴趣,了解工科博士生如何看待学术界和学术职 业至关重要。 目的/假设 本研究旨在描述那些曾考虑离开其博士课程的工科学生对学术失去兴趣的发展过程。研究采用了模式理论来探讨学生如何通过他们的生活经历发展和演变他们的学术概念。 设计/方法 收集了来自美国研究密集型大学的 42 名研究生的数据,他们参加了半结构化定性访谈,调查了他们对研究生院的期望、经历、减员和坚持的考虑因素以及职业轨迹。我们通过开放式编码和轴向编码对访谈记录进行了主题分析,以了解学生是如何构建他们的学院图式的。 研究结果 本文介绍了四位参与者的经历和引文,以描述记录誊本的结果。参与者对他们研究生项目的价值观和实践的期望不一致,再加上缺乏代理和支持,导致他们认为他们的研究生项目与他们短期和长期的职业成功是对立的。即使是那些有可能坚持到博士毕业的学生,他们也会因为对研究生项目的失望而对学术界失去兴趣,即使是那些曾经希望从事教师职业的学生也不例外。 结论 通过了解我们的参与者是如何产生厌学情绪的,我们可以更好地理解如何为学生提供资源,帮助他们顺利完成研究生课程。这项研究发现了一些未被充分利用的机会,以帮助学生做好准备应对工程学博士教育的挑战,从而推动了相关文献的发展。
{"title":"Elements of disenchantment: Exploring the development of academic disenchantment among US engineering graduate students","authors":"Kanembe Shanachilubwa,&nbsp;Gabriella Sallai,&nbsp;Catherine G. P. Berdanier","doi":"10.1002/jee.20624","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20624","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Background</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Given high attrition rates and lack of interest in faculty careers, it is crucial to understand how doctoral engineering students conceptualize academia and academic careers.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Purpose/Hypothesis</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>This study aims to characterize the development of academic disenchantment among engineering students who have considered departure from their doctoral programs. Schema theory was used to explore how students develop and evolve in their conceptualizations of academia through their lived experiences.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Design/Method</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Data were collected from 42 graduate students from research-intensive universities across the United States who participated in qualitative, semi-structured interviews investigating expectations for graduate school, experiences, attrition and persistence considerations, and career trajectories. The transcripts were thematically analyzed through open and axial coding to understand how students constructed their schemas of the academy.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Findings</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Experiences and quotations of four participants are presented to describe the results of the transcripts. Participants' misaligned expectations of their graduate program's values and practices, coupled with a lack of agency and support, led them to see their graduate programs as antagonistic to their short- and long-term career success. Even for students who may likely persist through to PhD degree completion, the development of disenchantment dissuades students—even those who once desired a faculty career—from interest in the academy.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusions</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>By understanding how disenchantment arose in our participants' experiences, we better understand how to equip students with resources that will help them navigate graduate programs. This research advances the literature by identifying underutilized opportunities to prepare students to cope with the challenges of engineering doctoral education.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":50206,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Engineering Education","volume":"114 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2024-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jee.20624","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142861812","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Exploring how personal and program characteristics inform the experiences of engineering students abroad 探讨个人和项目特点如何影响国外工程专业学生的经历
IF 3.9 2区 工程技术 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2024-12-09 DOI: 10.1002/jee.20625
Kirsten A. Davis, David B. Knight

Background

As more universities seek to offer international experiences for engineering students, it is important to design such programs to effectively support student learning abroad. Previous research on study abroad has focused on a limited number of outcomes and therefore failed to consider the diversity of experiences students may have in the same program and the range of learning outcomes they may develop while abroad.

Purpose

We explored student experiences across multiple types of engineering study abroad programs to address the research question: How do the types of significant experiences students highlighted from their time abroad differ based on student and/or program characteristics?

Method

We interviewed 79 engineering students after completing their study abroad programs using the critical incident technique to identify significant experiences from their time abroad. We used multiple rounds of coding to characterize the critical incidents identified by students and then compared the frequency of our main themes across student and program characteristics.

Results

We found that student experiences differed across both personal and program characteristics, in particular students' prior travel experiences, program duration, and the destination's cultural distance from the United States.

Conclusions

Our findings can inform the design of global engineering programs, which should consider the impact of program characteristics on student experiences and employ a variety of pedagogies to accommodate differences in students' needs and prior experiences. We also argue that it is important to consider students' experiences more holistically in research and evaluation of global engineering programs.

随着越来越多的大学寻求为工科学生提供国际经验,设计这样的项目来有效地支持学生的海外学习是很重要的。以往关于出国留学的研究关注的是有限的结果,因此没有考虑到学生在同一个项目中可能拥有的经历的多样性,以及他们在国外可能发展的学习成果的范围。我们探讨了学生在多种类型的海外工程学习项目中的经历,以解决研究问题:学生在海外学习期间所强调的重要经历的类型如何根据学生和/或项目的特点而有所不同?方法采用关键事件技术对79名完成海外留学项目的工科学生进行访谈,找出他们在海外学习期间的重要经历。我们使用多轮编码来描述学生识别的关键事件,然后比较我们的主题在学生和项目特征中的频率。我们发现,学生的经历在个人和项目特征上都存在差异,特别是学生之前的旅行经历、项目持续时间以及目的地与美国的文化距离。我们的研究结果可以为全球工程专业的设计提供信息,他们应该考虑课程特征对学生体验的影响,并采用各种教学法来适应学生需求和先前经验的差异。我们还认为,在全球工程项目的研究和评估中,更全面地考虑学生的经历是很重要的。
{"title":"Exploring how personal and program characteristics inform the experiences of engineering students abroad","authors":"Kirsten A. Davis,&nbsp;David B. Knight","doi":"10.1002/jee.20625","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20625","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Background</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>As more universities seek to offer international experiences for engineering students, it is important to design such programs to effectively support student learning abroad. Previous research on study abroad has focused on a limited number of outcomes and therefore failed to consider the diversity of experiences students may have in the same program and the range of learning outcomes they may develop while abroad.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Purpose</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>We explored student experiences across multiple types of engineering study abroad programs to address the research question: How do the types of significant experiences students highlighted from their time abroad differ based on student and/or program characteristics?</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Method</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>We interviewed 79 engineering students after completing their study abroad programs using the critical incident technique to identify significant experiences from their time abroad. We used multiple rounds of coding to characterize the critical incidents identified by students and then compared the frequency of our main themes across student and program characteristics.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>We found that student experiences differed across both personal and program characteristics, in particular students' prior travel experiences, program duration, and the destination's cultural distance from the United States.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusions</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Our findings can inform the design of global engineering programs, which should consider the impact of program characteristics on student experiences and employ a variety of pedagogies to accommodate differences in students' needs and prior experiences. We also argue that it is important to consider students' experiences more holistically in research and evaluation of global engineering programs.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":50206,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Engineering Education","volume":"114 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2024-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jee.20625","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142860601","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Assessing the impact of online collaborative problem solving on a calculus class for first-year engineering students: A communities of practice lens 评估在线协作解决问题对一年级工科学生微积分课的影响:一个实践镜头的社区
IF 3.9 2区 工程技术 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2024-12-02 DOI: 10.1002/jee.20622
Brayan Díaz, Daniela Luengo-Aravena, Pia Barahona, Patricio Felmer

Background

We examine the efficacy of an online collaborative problem-solving (CPS) teaching approach in academic performance and student connections with other peers, among first-year engineering calculus students at a Latin American university. Our research uses communities of practice (CoP) to emphasize the social nature of learning and the importance of participation and interaction within a community.

Methods

The work applies a quasi-experimental design and social network analysis (SNA). A total of 202 engineering students were instructed using CPS methodology (experimental group), while 380 students received traditional online teaching methods (control group) during one semester in the first calculus class for engineers.

Results

Results show no significant difference in the grades obtained between the experimental and control groups. However, students exposed to CPS reported a statistically significant higher passing rate, as well as larger and more significant academic and social connections. Additionally, SNA results suggest that CPS facilitated stronger peer connections and promoted a more equitable distribution of participation among students, particularly women, compared to students taught under traditional online teaching methods.

Conclusions

The study underscores the importance of fostering collaborative learning environments and highlights CPS as a strategy to enhance student performance and network formation. Findings suggest that CPS can improve academic outcomes and promote more equitable learning practices, potentially reducing dropout rates among women engineering students. These findings contribute to the ongoing efforts to address systematic biases and enhance learning experiences in engineering education.

本研究以一所拉丁美洲大学的一年级工程微积分学生为研究对象,考察了在线协作解决问题(CPS)教学方法在学习成绩和学生与其他同学联系方面的效果。我们的研究使用实践社区(CoP)来强调学习的社会性质以及社区内参与和互动的重要性。方法采用准实验设计和社会网络分析(SNA)。在第一学期的工程师微积分课上,共有202名工程学生使用CPS方法进行教学(实验组),380名学生使用传统的在线教学方法(对照组)。结果实验组与对照组的成绩无显著差异。然而,接触过CPS的学生报告了统计上显著更高的通过率,以及更大、更重要的学术和社会联系。此外,SNA结果表明,与传统的在线教学方法相比,CPS促进了更强的同伴联系,并促进了学生(特别是女性)更公平的参与分配。该研究强调了培养协作学习环境的重要性,并强调CPS是提高学生表现和网络形成的一种策略。研究结果表明,CPS可以提高学习成绩,促进更公平的学习实践,有可能降低女性工程专业学生的辍学率。这些发现有助于解决系统偏见和提高工程教育中的学习经验。
{"title":"Assessing the impact of online collaborative problem solving on a calculus class for first-year engineering students: A communities of practice lens","authors":"Brayan Díaz,&nbsp;Daniela Luengo-Aravena,&nbsp;Pia Barahona,&nbsp;Patricio Felmer","doi":"10.1002/jee.20622","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20622","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Background</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>We examine the efficacy of an online collaborative problem-solving (CPS) teaching approach in academic performance and student connections with other peers, among first-year engineering calculus students at a Latin American university. Our research uses communities of practice (CoP) to emphasize the social nature of learning and the importance of participation and interaction within a community.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>The work applies a quasi-experimental design and social network analysis (SNA). A total of 202 engineering students were instructed using CPS methodology (experimental group), while 380 students received traditional online teaching methods (control group) during one semester in the first calculus class for engineers.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Results show no significant difference in the grades obtained between the experimental and control groups. However, students exposed to CPS reported a statistically significant higher passing rate, as well as larger and more significant academic and social connections. Additionally, SNA results suggest that CPS facilitated stronger peer connections and promoted a more equitable distribution of participation among students, particularly women, compared to students taught under traditional online teaching methods.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusions</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>The study underscores the importance of fostering collaborative learning environments and highlights CPS as a strategy to enhance student performance and network formation. Findings suggest that CPS can improve academic outcomes and promote more equitable learning practices, potentially reducing dropout rates among women engineering students. These findings contribute to the ongoing efforts to address systematic biases and enhance learning experiences in engineering education.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":50206,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Engineering Education","volume":"114 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2024-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jee.20622","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142764218","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Group diversity, diversity beliefs, and group processes in a design course for engineering students 工科学生设计课程中的群体多样性、多样性信念和群体过程
IF 3.9 2区 工程技术 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2024-12-02 DOI: 10.1002/jee.20623
Cui Ping, Ad Kleingeld, Marloes Hendrickx, Sonja Rispens, Ruurd Taconis

Background

The engineering profession has changed dramatically, and engineers today must work in diverse (multidisciplinary or international) groups. As such, practice in diverse student groupwork can be beneficial to develop all-round skillsets. However, simply mixing students with different backgrounds into one group is not always effective in engineering group projects.

Purpose

This study investigates how a diverse student group composition is related to group processes and, subsequently, group output, and also to see whether students' positive diversity beliefs influence the relation between diverse student group composition and group processes.

Method

Multilevel analyses were performed on 124 groups to analyze associations between diversity in group compositions (nationality and gender diversity), group processes (task elaboration, shared understanding of the task, and trust in the group), and group outcomes (performance and satisfaction), at both the individual and group level. Positive diversity beliefs were included as moderators.

Results

We found negative group-level associations between nationality diversity and shared understanding of the task and trust in the group. On the individual level, we found students' relative positive diversity beliefs to be positively associated with their perceptions of all group processes, which, in turn, were positively associated with perceived group performance and satisfaction.

Conclusions

A student group with different nationalities may encounter challenges in group processes, although we did not find direct implications for group performance and group-level satisfaction. Individual student perceptions of group processes were more clearly associated with outcomes than group-level aggregates. To facilitate diverse student groupwork, educators need to pay attention to and enhance students' awareness of the value of working in a diverse group.

工程专业已经发生了巨大的变化,今天的工程师必须在不同的(多学科或国际)团队中工作。因此,在不同的学生小组工作中进行实践有助于培养全面的技能。然而,在工程小组项目中,简单地将不同背景的学生混合在一起并不总是有效的。本研究旨在探讨多元化的学生群体构成与群体过程以及群体产出之间的关系,并探讨学生积极的多样性信念是否会影响多元化的学生群体构成与群体过程之间的关系。方法对124个群体进行多水平分析,从个人和群体层面分析群体构成多样性(国籍和性别多样性)、群体过程多样性(任务阐述、对任务的共同理解和对群体的信任)和群体结果多样性(绩效和满意度)之间的关系。积极的多样性信念作为调节因素。结果在群体层面上,国籍多样性对任务的共同理解和对群体的信任呈负相关。在个体层面上,我们发现学生的相对积极的多样性信念与他们对所有群体过程的感知呈正相关,而群体过程的感知又与群体表现和满意度呈正相关。结论不同国籍的学生群体在群体过程中可能会遇到挑战,尽管我们没有发现群体表现和群体水平满意度的直接影响。学生个体对群体过程的感知与结果的关系比群体层面的总和更明显。为了促进多样化的学生小组工作,教育工作者需要关注并提高学生对多元化小组工作价值的认识。
{"title":"Group diversity, diversity beliefs, and group processes in a design course for engineering students","authors":"Cui Ping,&nbsp;Ad Kleingeld,&nbsp;Marloes Hendrickx,&nbsp;Sonja Rispens,&nbsp;Ruurd Taconis","doi":"10.1002/jee.20623","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20623","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Background</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>The engineering profession has changed dramatically, and engineers today must work in diverse (multidisciplinary or international) groups. As such, practice in diverse student groupwork can be beneficial to develop all-round skillsets. However, simply mixing students with different backgrounds into one group is not always effective in engineering group projects.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Purpose</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>This study investigates how a diverse student group composition is related to group processes and, subsequently, group output, and also to see whether students' positive diversity beliefs influence the relation between diverse student group composition and group processes.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Method</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Multilevel analyses were performed on 124 groups to analyze associations between diversity in group compositions (nationality and gender diversity), group processes (task elaboration, shared understanding of the task, and trust in the group), and group outcomes (performance and satisfaction), at both the individual and group level. Positive diversity beliefs were included as moderators.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>We found negative group-level associations between nationality diversity and shared understanding of the task and trust in the group. On the individual level, we found students' relative positive diversity beliefs to be positively associated with their perceptions of all group processes, which, in turn, were positively associated with perceived group performance and satisfaction.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusions</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>A student group with different nationalities may encounter challenges in group processes, although we did not find direct implications for group performance and group-level satisfaction. Individual student perceptions of group processes were more clearly associated with outcomes than group-level aggregates. To facilitate diverse student groupwork, educators need to pay attention to and enhance students' awareness of the value of working in a diverse group.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":50206,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Engineering Education","volume":"114 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2024-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142764219","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Building bridges to engineering interest: Connections between student perceptions of instructor actions and interest in engineering classes 建立对工程兴趣的桥梁:学生对教师行为的感知与对工程课程的兴趣之间的联系
IF 3.9 2区 工程技术 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2024-11-29 DOI: 10.1002/jee.20621
Ella Miesner, Diane L. Schallert

Background

Development of subject-matter interest can motivate long-term learning. Prior research indicates that what instructors do in learning environments and how students feel about their relationship to instructors influence students' learning via the motivational mechanism of interest. This study's research into instructor actions in online learning contexts and in student perceptions of relatedness and interest was inspired by the 21st century transition to online instruction accelerated by COVID-19.

Purpose/Hypothesis(es)

This study sought to determine links between student-perceived teaching presence and immediacy behaviors, perceptions of relatedness to the instructor, and course subject interest. We hypothesized that student interest develops from instructor actions mediated by perceptions of relatedness to the instructor.

Design/Method

Multiple methods were used to investigate associations between instructor actions in college-level engineering courses taught synchronously online and students' perceptions of relatedness to instructor and interest. Qualitative interviews with engineering instructors corroborated use of teaching presence and immediacy behaviors as constructs to describe online instructional actions. Quantitative surveys were administered to undergraduate students (n = 141) enrolled in synchronous, online engineering classes. Qualitative interviews with 10 students supplemented survey findings.

Results

Path modeling and regression models of results indicated that students' perceptions of teaching presence online, but not immediacy behaviors, were predictive of relatedness to instructor and situational interest in course content. Qualitative data corroborated the survey findings by giving voice to students' lived experience.

Conclusions

Synthesis of results suggests strategies that could develop teaching presence and enhance student perceptions of relatedness to instructors online, ultimately enhancing interest in engineering.

主题兴趣的发展可以激发长期学习。已有研究表明,教师在学习环境中的行为以及学生对教师关系的感受通过兴趣动机机制影响学生的学习。受新冠肺炎疫情加速的21世纪在线教学转型的启发,本研究对教师在在线学习环境中的行为以及学生对相关性和兴趣的看法进行了研究。目的/假设:本研究旨在确定学生感知的教学存在与即时性行为、与教师的关系感知和课程主题兴趣之间的联系。我们假设学生的兴趣是从教师的行为中发展起来的,而教师的行为是由与教师的关系感知所介导的。设计/方法采用多种方法调查大学水平的在线同步教学工程课程中教师行为与学生对教师关系和兴趣的感知之间的关系。与工程教师的定性访谈证实了使用教学在场和即时行为作为描述在线教学行为的结构。对同步在线工程课程的本科生(n = 141)进行了定量调查。对10名学生的定性访谈补充了调查结果。结果路径模型和回归模型结果表明,学生对在线教学存在感的感知,而不是即时行为,可以预测与教师的关系和对课程内容的情境兴趣。定性数据通过表达学生的生活经历证实了调查结果。结论:综合研究结果,我们提出了一些策略,可以提高教学存在感,增强学生对在线教师的归属感,最终提高他们对工程学的兴趣。
{"title":"Building bridges to engineering interest: Connections between student perceptions of instructor actions and interest in engineering classes","authors":"Ella Miesner,&nbsp;Diane L. Schallert","doi":"10.1002/jee.20621","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20621","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Background</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Development of subject-matter interest can motivate long-term learning. Prior research indicates that what instructors do in learning environments and how students feel about their relationship to instructors influence students' learning via the motivational mechanism of interest. This study's research into instructor actions in online learning contexts and in student perceptions of relatedness and interest was inspired by the 21st century transition to online instruction accelerated by COVID-19.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Purpose/Hypothesis(es)</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>This study sought to determine links between student-perceived teaching presence and immediacy behaviors, perceptions of relatedness to the instructor, and course subject interest. We hypothesized that student interest develops from instructor actions mediated by perceptions of relatedness to the instructor.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Design/Method</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Multiple methods were used to investigate associations between instructor actions in college-level engineering courses taught synchronously online and students' perceptions of relatedness to instructor and interest. Qualitative interviews with engineering instructors corroborated use of <i>teaching presence</i> and <i>immediacy behaviors</i> as constructs to describe online instructional actions. Quantitative surveys were administered to undergraduate students (<i>n</i> = 141) enrolled in synchronous, online engineering classes. Qualitative interviews with 10 students supplemented survey findings.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Path modeling and regression models of results indicated that students' perceptions of teaching presence online, but not immediacy behaviors, were predictive of relatedness to instructor and situational interest in course content. Qualitative data corroborated the survey findings by giving voice to students' lived experience.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusions</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Synthesis of results suggests strategies that could develop teaching presence and enhance student perceptions of relatedness to instructors online, ultimately enhancing interest in engineering.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":50206,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Engineering Education","volume":"114 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2024-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142758048","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Journal of Engineering Education
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1