首页 > 最新文献

Journal of Endovascular Therapy最新文献

英文 中文
Development of a Multidisciplinary Decision Support Instrument for Patients With a Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Based on Multidisciplinary Codified Peer Expertise: A Discrete Choice Experiment. 基于多学科同行经验编纂的腹主动脉瘤破裂患者多学科决策支持工具的开发:一个离散选择实验。
IF 1.5 2区 医学 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE Pub Date : 2025-12-19 DOI: 10.1177/15266028251397338
Lotte F Hijkoop, Martijn L Dijkstra, Barbara L van Leeuwen, Sohrab Khadjeh, Willemina A van Veldhuizen, Koen M E M Reyntjens, Meine H Fernhout, Simone N Schuurman, Marije Smit, Barbara C van Munster, Richte C L Schuurmann, Jean-Paul P M de Vries
<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Treatment decisions for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (rAAA) patients are made under extreme time pressure and often with limited patient information and without opportunity for multidisciplinary consultation. This study describes the development of a decision-support instrument (DSI) to predict how experts would decide in real-life emergency scenarios, based on patient characteristics including frailty, estimated life expectancy, and treatment preference.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The DSI was developed using a discrete choice experiment. A multidisciplinary group of medical specialists, including vascular/oncological surgeons, anesthesiologists, intensivists, and geriatricians, defined the relevant criteria for deciding whether to operate on an rAAA based on patient-specific factors and expert opinion. The group identified relevant levels for each criterion, with an increasing risk for worse outcomes. Criteria that would immediately exclude a patient from treatment were designated as knockout criteria. An expert panel of 21 medical specialists evaluated 30 fictional patient scenarios, which resulted in a weight for each criterion expressed as relative importance (RI); a measure of how much each criterion, compared to the sum of all criteria, contributes to the model's outcome. The finalized DSI predicts the percentage of medical specialists who would choose to operate on a specific patient, based on the input criteria for that patient.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In 4 criteria sessions with medical experts, consensus was reached on 11 criteria that were judged to influence the decision whether to operate or not: <i>cardiopulmonary resuscitation, patient's wish for operation, renal function, age, life expectancy, endovascular treatment options, hemoglobin blood concentration, mean arterial pressure, pulmonary burden, cardiac burden</i>, and <i>clinical frailty score.</i> Nine criteria had a significant impact on the decision; the most significant were <i>cardiac burden (RI</i>, 15%), <i>age</i> (<i>RI</i>, 13%), <i>life expectancy</i> (<i>RI</i>, 13%), and <i>Clinical Frailty Scale and pulmonary burden</i> (both <i>RI</i>, 12%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A clinical DSI was developed, based on codified multidisciplinary peer expertise, to support real-life medical decision-making during acute treatment planning for rAAA. Three parameters that are underreported in previous scoring systems (patient's frailty, estimated life expectancy, and patient's desire to be operated) were considered most important for treatment decision.Clinical ImpactTreatment decisions for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm patients are time-critical and morally complex, often made with limited clinical information and without multidisciplinary consultation. This study describes the development of a transparent decision-support instrument (DSI) based on multidisciplinary peer expertise. By reflecting decision logic an
简介:腹主动脉瘤破裂(rAAA)患者的治疗决定是在极端的时间压力下做出的,通常患者信息有限,没有机会进行多学科咨询。本研究描述了决策支持工具(DSI)的发展,以预测专家如何在现实生活中的紧急情况下做出决定,基于患者的特征,包括虚弱,估计预期寿命和治疗偏好。方法:采用离散选择实验的方法建立DSI量表。一个多学科医学专家小组,包括血管/肿瘤外科医生、麻醉科医生、重症监护医生和老年病医生,根据患者的具体因素和专家意见,确定了决定是否在rAAA上进行手术的相关标准。该小组确定了每个标准的相关水平,结果恶化的风险增加。立即排除患者治疗的标准被指定为基因敲除标准。一个由21名医学专家组成的专家小组评估了30种虚构的病人情况,得出每个标准的相对重要性(RI)权重;与所有标准的总和相比,衡量每个标准对模型结果的贡献程度。最终确定的DSI预测了根据该患者的输入标准,选择对该患者进行手术的医学专家的百分比。结果:在与医学专家的4次标准会议中,就影响是否手术的11项标准达成共识:心肺复苏、患者手术意愿、肾功能、年龄、预期寿命、血管内治疗方案、血红蛋白血浓度、平均动脉压、肺负担、心脏负担、临床虚弱评分。9项标准对决定有重大影响;最重要的是心脏负担(RI, 15%)、年龄(RI, 13%)、预期寿命(RI, 13%)、临床虚弱量表和肺负担(均为RI, 12%)。结论:基于规范化的多学科同行专业知识,开发了临床DSI,以支持rAAA急性治疗计划期间的现实医疗决策。在以前的评分系统中被低估的三个参数(患者的虚弱程度、预计寿命和患者的手术意愿)被认为对治疗决策最重要。临床影响腹主动脉瘤破裂患者的治疗决策是时间紧迫和道德复杂的,通常是在有限的临床信息和没有多学科咨询的情况下做出的。本研究描述了基于多学科同行专业知识的透明决策支持工具(DSI)的开发。通过反映专家认为重要的决策逻辑和标准,DSI可能有助于更一致的决策,并帮助确定姑息治疗可能更适合的患者。尽管这种方法可能在紧急、道德复杂的情况下支持临床医生,但仍需进一步验证以确定其临床效用。
{"title":"Development of a Multidisciplinary Decision Support Instrument for Patients With a Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Based on Multidisciplinary Codified Peer Expertise: A Discrete Choice Experiment.","authors":"Lotte F Hijkoop, Martijn L Dijkstra, Barbara L van Leeuwen, Sohrab Khadjeh, Willemina A van Veldhuizen, Koen M E M Reyntjens, Meine H Fernhout, Simone N Schuurman, Marije Smit, Barbara C van Munster, Richte C L Schuurmann, Jean-Paul P M de Vries","doi":"10.1177/15266028251397338","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15266028251397338","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Introduction: &lt;/strong&gt;Treatment decisions for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (rAAA) patients are made under extreme time pressure and often with limited patient information and without opportunity for multidisciplinary consultation. This study describes the development of a decision-support instrument (DSI) to predict how experts would decide in real-life emergency scenarios, based on patient characteristics including frailty, estimated life expectancy, and treatment preference.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Methods: &lt;/strong&gt;The DSI was developed using a discrete choice experiment. A multidisciplinary group of medical specialists, including vascular/oncological surgeons, anesthesiologists, intensivists, and geriatricians, defined the relevant criteria for deciding whether to operate on an rAAA based on patient-specific factors and expert opinion. The group identified relevant levels for each criterion, with an increasing risk for worse outcomes. Criteria that would immediately exclude a patient from treatment were designated as knockout criteria. An expert panel of 21 medical specialists evaluated 30 fictional patient scenarios, which resulted in a weight for each criterion expressed as relative importance (RI); a measure of how much each criterion, compared to the sum of all criteria, contributes to the model's outcome. The finalized DSI predicts the percentage of medical specialists who would choose to operate on a specific patient, based on the input criteria for that patient.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Results: &lt;/strong&gt;In 4 criteria sessions with medical experts, consensus was reached on 11 criteria that were judged to influence the decision whether to operate or not: &lt;i&gt;cardiopulmonary resuscitation, patient's wish for operation, renal function, age, life expectancy, endovascular treatment options, hemoglobin blood concentration, mean arterial pressure, pulmonary burden, cardiac burden&lt;/i&gt;, and &lt;i&gt;clinical frailty score.&lt;/i&gt; Nine criteria had a significant impact on the decision; the most significant were &lt;i&gt;cardiac burden (RI&lt;/i&gt;, 15%), &lt;i&gt;age&lt;/i&gt; (&lt;i&gt;RI&lt;/i&gt;, 13%), &lt;i&gt;life expectancy&lt;/i&gt; (&lt;i&gt;RI&lt;/i&gt;, 13%), and &lt;i&gt;Clinical Frailty Scale and pulmonary burden&lt;/i&gt; (both &lt;i&gt;RI&lt;/i&gt;, 12%).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Conclusion: &lt;/strong&gt;A clinical DSI was developed, based on codified multidisciplinary peer expertise, to support real-life medical decision-making during acute treatment planning for rAAA. Three parameters that are underreported in previous scoring systems (patient's frailty, estimated life expectancy, and patient's desire to be operated) were considered most important for treatment decision.Clinical ImpactTreatment decisions for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm patients are time-critical and morally complex, often made with limited clinical information and without multidisciplinary consultation. This study describes the development of a transparent decision-support instrument (DSI) based on multidisciplinary peer expertise. By reflecting decision logic an","PeriodicalId":50210,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Endovascular Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"15266028251397338"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2025-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145783756","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Anatomical Feasibility of the Off-the-Shelf G-Branch System for Treatment of Thoracoabdominal Aortic Aneurysms. 现成的g支系统治疗胸腹主动脉瘤的解剖学可行性。
IF 1.5 2区 医学 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE Pub Date : 2025-12-18 DOI: 10.1177/15266028251396289
Yongle Xu, Xinhao Wang, Feng Liu, Hongpeng Zhang, Yangyang Ge, Jiangping Gao, Lijun Wang, Wei Guo

Objective: This study was performed to evaluate the anatomical feasibility of the off-the-shelf G-Branch device (Lifetech Scientific, Shenzhen, China) for the endovascular treatment of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAAs).

Methods: Digital computed tomography angiograms were analyzed in 171 consecutive patients with TAAAs who enrolled for imaging screening in a national multicentre clinical trial to evaluate the feasibility of the G-Branch system between November 12, 2021 and June 25, 2023. Anatomical feasibility was assessed based on the investigational protocols and the instructions for use (IFUs).

Results: According to the standard, conservative, and liberal IFU criteria, the overall feasibility of the G-Branch system was 74.9% (128/171), 59.1% (101/171), and 80.7% (138/171), respectively. The top 3 factors limiting feasibility by the standard IFU criteria were a stenosed or occlusive renal artery (19/171), an accessory renal artery with a diameter of ≥3 mm (15/171), and a renal artery landing zone of <15 mm (14/171).

Conclusions: The G-Branch system demonstrates favorable feasibility for the endovascular treatment of TAAAs, particularly with the aid of other endovascular techniques. The main limitations were stenosed or occlusive renovisceral arteries and accessory renal arteries.Clinical ImpactThe G-Branch system's high anatomical feasibility, especially with the aid of other endovascular techniques, has the potential to change clinical practice in the treatment of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAAs). For clinicians, it offers a more viable off-the-shelf option that can be applied to a large proportion of TAAA patients, expanding the scope of endovascular treatment and providing a more convenient and efficient alternative to traditional open surgery. The innovation behind this study lies in the comprehensive evaluation of the G-Branch system's anatomical feasibility based on a large sample size from a national multicentre clinical trial, which provides valuable insights into its clinical application and helps identify the main limitations that need to be addressed in future device development and clinical practice.

目的:本研究旨在评估现成的G-Branch装置(Lifetech science,深圳,中国)用于胸腹主动脉瘤(TAAAs)血管内治疗的解剖学可行性。方法:在2021年11月12日至2023年6月25日期间,对171例连续的taaa患者的数字计算机断层血管造影进行分析,这些患者参加了一项国家多中心临床试验,以评估G-Branch系统的可行性。根据研究方案和使用说明书(ifu)评估解剖可行性。结果:按照标准、保守和自由IFU标准,G-Branch系统的总体可行性分别为74.9%(128/171)、59.1%(101/171)和80.7%(138/171)。根据标准IFU标准,限制可行性的前3个因素是肾动脉狭窄或闭塞(19/171)、肾副动脉直径≥3mm(15/171)和肾动脉着陆区。结论:g支系统在血管内治疗TAAAs具有良好的可行性,特别是在其他血管内技术的辅助下。主要的局限性是肾脏动脉和副肾动脉狭窄或闭塞。临床影响G-Branch系统在解剖学上的高度可行性,特别是在其他血管内技术的帮助下,有可能改变胸腹主动脉瘤(TAAAs)治疗的临床实践。对于临床医生来说,它提供了一种更可行的现成选择,可以应用于大部分TAAA患者,扩大了血管内治疗的范围,为传统的开放手术提供了一种更方便、更有效的选择。本研究的创新之处在于,基于一项全国性多中心临床试验的大样本,对G-Branch系统的解剖学可行性进行了全面评估,为其临床应用提供了有价值的见解,并有助于确定未来设备开发和临床实践中需要解决的主要限制。
{"title":"Anatomical Feasibility of the Off-the-Shelf G-Branch System for Treatment of Thoracoabdominal Aortic Aneurysms.","authors":"Yongle Xu, Xinhao Wang, Feng Liu, Hongpeng Zhang, Yangyang Ge, Jiangping Gao, Lijun Wang, Wei Guo","doi":"10.1177/15266028251396289","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15266028251396289","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study was performed to evaluate the anatomical feasibility of the off-the-shelf G-Branch device (Lifetech Scientific, Shenzhen, China) for the endovascular treatment of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAAs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Digital computed tomography angiograms were analyzed in 171 consecutive patients with TAAAs who enrolled for imaging screening in a national multicentre clinical trial to evaluate the feasibility of the G-Branch system between November 12, 2021 and June 25, 2023. Anatomical feasibility was assessed based on the investigational protocols and the instructions for use (IFUs).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>According to the standard, conservative, and liberal IFU criteria, the overall feasibility of the G-Branch system was 74.9% (128/171), 59.1% (101/171), and 80.7% (138/171), respectively. The top 3 factors limiting feasibility by the standard IFU criteria were a stenosed or occlusive renal artery (19/171), an accessory renal artery with a diameter of ≥3 mm (15/171), and a renal artery landing zone of <15 mm (14/171).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The G-Branch system demonstrates favorable feasibility for the endovascular treatment of TAAAs, particularly with the aid of other endovascular techniques. The main limitations were stenosed or occlusive renovisceral arteries and accessory renal arteries.Clinical ImpactThe G-Branch system's high anatomical feasibility, especially with the aid of other endovascular techniques, has the potential to change clinical practice in the treatment of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAAs). For clinicians, it offers a more viable off-the-shelf option that can be applied to a large proportion of TAAA patients, expanding the scope of endovascular treatment and providing a more convenient and efficient alternative to traditional open surgery. The innovation behind this study lies in the comprehensive evaluation of the G-Branch system's anatomical feasibility based on a large sample size from a national multicentre clinical trial, which provides valuable insights into its clinical application and helps identify the main limitations that need to be addressed in future device development and clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":50210,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Endovascular Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"15266028251396289"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2025-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145776212","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Three-Year Outcomes of a Randomized Controlled Trial Investigating the Use of Intravascular Ultrasound in Femoropopliteal Endovascular Interventions. 一项研究股腘血管内超声介入的三年随机对照试验的结果。
IF 1.5 2区 医学 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE Pub Date : 2025-12-18 DOI: 10.1177/15266028251398977
Richard B Allan, Phillip J Puckridge, Christopher L Delaney

Objective: To investigate whether there was a difference in the rate of binary restenosis at 36 months post-endovascular treatment between procedures guided by addition of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) guidance and procedures guided by angiography alone.

Materials and methods: This was a prospective single-center trial of 150 patients undergoing femoropopliteal endovascular intervention, randomized (1:1) to a control group (guidance by angiography) or treatment group (guidance by IVUS and angiography). Follow-up of outcome measures was up to 36 months. The primary outcome measure was freedom from binary restenosis as defined by a peak systolic velocity ratio ≥ 2.4 on duplex ultrasound. Secondary outcomes included clinically-directed target lesion revascularization (cdTLR) and major adverse events (MAEs). Analysis of binary restenosis and directed target lesion revascularization by treatment subgroup was also performed.

Results: Freedom from binary restenosis up to 36 months post-procedure was significantly higher in the treatment group (IVUS and angiographic guidance) (48.8% vs 34.7%, p=0.011). There was no difference between the groups in freedom from cdTLR (66.7% vs 64.9%, p=0.697) or MAEs (40.5% vs 32.9%, p=0.397). Freedom from binary restenosis was higher in the treatment group for cases treated with drug-coated balloons (68.2% vs 47.5%, p=0.005).

Conclusions: Guidance with combined IVUS and angiography resulted in a higher proportion of cases remaining free of binary restenosis at 36 months compared with cases guided by angiography alone but no difference was seen between the groups for cdTLR.

Clinical trials registry: ACTRN12614000006640Clinical ImpactThis randomised controlled trial comparing 3 year outcomes for femoropopliteal endovascular procedures guided either by angiography or by angiography and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) found that the binary restenosis rates was lower when IVUS guidance was included. This represents the longest duration prospective evidence supporting the use of IVUS. The long-term clinical benefit of IVUS are less clear as there was no difference in target lesion revascularisation rates. The benefit appears to be primarily related to drug-coated balloon treatment and further studies powered specifically for this treatment are required to confirm whether clinical benefits are present.

目的:探讨血管内超声(IVUS)联合引导与单纯血管造影引导下血管内治疗后36个月二元再狭窄发生率的差异。材料和方法:这是一项前瞻性单中心试验,150例接受股腘血管内介入治疗的患者,随机(1:1)分为对照组(血管造影指导)和治疗组(IVUS和血管造影指导)。结果测量的随访时间长达36个月。主要结局指标为双超声收缩压峰值速比≥2.4,以确定患者是否存在二元再狭窄。次要结局包括临床定向靶病变血运重建术(cdTLR)和主要不良事件(MAEs)。对治疗亚组的二元再狭窄和定向靶区血运重建情况进行分析。结果:治疗组(IVUS和血管造影指导)术后36个月的二元再狭窄自由度显著高于对照组(48.8% vs 34.7%, p=0.011)。cdTLR自由度(66.7% vs 64.9%, p=0.697)和MAEs自由度(40.5% vs 32.9%, p=0.397)组间无差异。药物包被球囊治疗组患者的二元再狭窄发生率更高(68.2% vs 47.5%, p=0.005)。结论:联合IVUS和血管造影指导下36个月无二元再狭窄的病例比例高于单独血管造影指导下的病例,但cdTLR组间无差异。临床影响:这项随机对照试验比较了在血管造影或血管造影和血管内超声(IVUS)指导下进行股腘血管内手术的3年结果,发现在IVUS指导下,二元再狭窄率较低。这是支持IVUS使用的持续时间最长的前瞻性证据。IVUS的长期临床益处尚不清楚,因为在靶病变血运重建率方面没有差异。这种益处似乎主要与药物包被球囊治疗有关,需要进一步的研究来证实这种治疗是否存在临床益处。
{"title":"Three-Year Outcomes of a Randomized Controlled Trial Investigating the Use of Intravascular Ultrasound in Femoropopliteal Endovascular Interventions.","authors":"Richard B Allan, Phillip J Puckridge, Christopher L Delaney","doi":"10.1177/15266028251398977","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15266028251398977","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate whether there was a difference in the rate of binary restenosis at 36 months post-endovascular treatment between procedures guided by addition of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) guidance and procedures guided by angiography alone.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This was a prospective single-center trial of 150 patients undergoing femoropopliteal endovascular intervention, randomized (1:1) to a control group (guidance by angiography) or treatment group (guidance by IVUS and angiography). Follow-up of outcome measures was up to 36 months. The primary outcome measure was freedom from binary restenosis as defined by a peak systolic velocity ratio ≥ 2.4 on duplex ultrasound. Secondary outcomes included clinically-directed target lesion revascularization (cdTLR) and major adverse events (MAEs). Analysis of binary restenosis and directed target lesion revascularization by treatment subgroup was also performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Freedom from binary restenosis up to 36 months post-procedure was significantly higher in the treatment group (IVUS and angiographic guidance) (48.8% vs 34.7%, p=0.011). There was no difference between the groups in freedom from cdTLR (66.7% vs 64.9%, p=0.697) or MAEs (40.5% vs 32.9%, p=0.397). Freedom from binary restenosis was higher in the treatment group for cases treated with drug-coated balloons (68.2% vs 47.5%, p=0.005).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Guidance with combined IVUS and angiography resulted in a higher proportion of cases remaining free of binary restenosis at 36 months compared with cases guided by angiography alone but no difference was seen between the groups for cdTLR.</p><p><strong>Clinical trials registry: </strong>ACTRN12614000006640Clinical ImpactThis randomised controlled trial comparing 3 year outcomes for femoropopliteal endovascular procedures guided either by angiography or by angiography and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) found that the binary restenosis rates was lower when IVUS guidance was included. This represents the longest duration prospective evidence supporting the use of IVUS. The long-term clinical benefit of IVUS are less clear as there was no difference in target lesion revascularisation rates. The benefit appears to be primarily related to drug-coated balloon treatment and further studies powered specifically for this treatment are required to confirm whether clinical benefits are present.</p>","PeriodicalId":50210,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Endovascular Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"15266028251398977"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2025-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145776163","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Trends and Outcomes of Elective Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair in California State 2016 to 2022. 2016年至2022年加利福尼亚州选择性腹主动脉瘤修复的趋势和结果
IF 1.5 2区 医学 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE Pub Date : 2025-12-18 DOI: 10.1177/15266028251403923
Raed M Ennab
<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To describe statewide trends in elective intact abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair in California (2016-2022) and to evaluate hospital-level volume-outcome relationships for endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) and open surgical repair (OSR) during 2019 to 2022.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective analysis of the California Inpatient Mortality Indicators. The primary outcome was 30-day crude mortality; the 2022 risk-adjusted mortality rate (RAMR) served as a benchmark. Hospitals were aggregated across 2019 to 2022. Associations between hospital volume and mortality were tested with Spearman correlation, data-driven threshold scans, and overdispersion-adjusted binomial funnel plots with outlier flagging restricted to hospitals with ≥30 procedures. Sensitivity analyses excluded hospitals with <10 cases and excluded 2020.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 2016 to 2022, there were 10 464 elective AAA repairs statewide. Since the coding split in 2019, EVAR has comprised ~92% of cases annually. Across 2019 to 2022, there were 6882 EVARs (53 deaths; crude mortality 0.77%) and 625 OSRs (42 deaths; 6.72%). In 2022, RAMR was 0.48% for EVAR and 4.43% for OSR. The highest-volume quartiles performed 55% of statewide cases for both modalities. For OSR, volume was not associated with mortality (ρ=0.15; p=0.27), no discrete volume threshold was identified, and no high- or low-mortality outliers were detected at ≥30 cases. For EVAR, volume correlated positively with crude mortality (ρ=0.36; p<0.001); no robust cut-point emerged; and a small number of high-mortality outliers appeared at the 95% limits and none at 99.8% (≥30 cases). Sensitivity analyses were concordant. The positive EVAR correlation likely reflects higher-risk case-mix at referral centers rather than a detrimental effect of volume.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Contemporary elective EVAR in California demonstrates uniformly low mortality with few outliers and no hospital-volume threshold. The OSR outcomes are more variable, yet hospital volume is not associated with mortality. These findings support broad access to EVAR with routine outcomes-based surveillance and suggest that any concentration of open repair should be guided by demonstrated outcomes rather than arbitrary minimum-volume mandates.Clinical ImpactThis study provides actionable guidance for service design and referral. Elective endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) shows uniformly low mortality across hospitals, so access can remain broad; quality efforts should focus on continuous audit and rapid remediation of the rare high-mortality outliers identified by funnel monitoring. Open repair exhibits wider variability without a defensible volume cutoff; therefore, complex or open-eligible cases should be preferentially directed to teams with demonstrated outcomes rather than to centers meeting arbitrary case counts. Programs should formalize escalation and transfer pathways for open repair
目的:描述加利福尼亚州(2016-2022年)选择性完整腹主动脉瘤(AAA)修复的全州趋势,并评估2019年至2022年期间血管内动脉瘤修复(EVAR)和开放式手术修复(OSR)的医院水平容量与结果的关系。方法:对加州住院病人死亡率指标进行回顾性分析。主要终点为30天粗死亡率;2022年风险调整死亡率(RAMR)作为基准。医院在2019年至2022年期间进行了汇总。采用Spearman相关性、数据驱动阈值扫描和过度分散调整二项漏斗图检验医院容量与死亡率之间的相关性,异常值标记仅限于手术≥30例的医院。结果:2016年至2022年,全州共有10464例选择性AAA修复。自2019年编码分裂以来,EVAR占每年病例的92%。2019年至2022年,共有6882例evar(53例死亡,粗死亡率0.77%)和625例osr(42例死亡,6.72%)。2022年,EVAR的RAMR为0.48%,OSR为4.43%。两种模式下,最高容量四分位数占全州病例的55%。对于OSR,体积与死亡率无关(ρ=0.15; p=0.27),没有确定离散体积阈值,在≥30例中没有检测到高或低死亡率异常值。对于EVAR,容积与粗死亡率呈正相关(ρ=0.36)。结论:加州当代选择性EVAR的死亡率一致较低,几乎没有异常值,也没有医院容积阈值。OSR结果变化较大,但医院容量与死亡率无关。这些发现支持通过常规的基于结果的监测来广泛开展EVAR,并建议任何开放性修复的集中都应以证明的结果为指导,而不是武断的最小容量授权。临床影响本研究为服务设计和转诊提供了可操作的指导。选择性血管内动脉瘤修复(EVAR)在各医院的死亡率均较低,因此可广泛使用;质量工作应侧重于持续审计和快速纠正通过漏斗监测确定的罕见的高死亡率异常值。开放式修复表现出更大的可变性,没有可防御的体积切断;因此,复杂的或符合开放条件的病例应优先指导具有证明结果的团队,而不是满足任意病例数的中心。项目应使开放性修复的升级和转移途径正规化,通过有针对性的病例集中和跨部位覆盖来维持外科医生的能力,并通过风险调整仪表板跟踪结果。对于患者,咨询可以强调EVAR的早期安全性,并在经验丰富的患者中选择性地使用开放手术。卫生系统可以将资源分配给EVAR能力、监测基础设施和保留主动脉瓣开放专业知识,而不是强制执行严格的最小容量。
{"title":"Trends and Outcomes of Elective Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair in California State 2016 to 2022.","authors":"Raed M Ennab","doi":"10.1177/15266028251403923","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15266028251403923","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Objective: &lt;/strong&gt;To describe statewide trends in elective intact abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair in California (2016-2022) and to evaluate hospital-level volume-outcome relationships for endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) and open surgical repair (OSR) during 2019 to 2022.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Methods: &lt;/strong&gt;Retrospective analysis of the California Inpatient Mortality Indicators. The primary outcome was 30-day crude mortality; the 2022 risk-adjusted mortality rate (RAMR) served as a benchmark. Hospitals were aggregated across 2019 to 2022. Associations between hospital volume and mortality were tested with Spearman correlation, data-driven threshold scans, and overdispersion-adjusted binomial funnel plots with outlier flagging restricted to hospitals with ≥30 procedures. Sensitivity analyses excluded hospitals with &lt;10 cases and excluded 2020.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Results: &lt;/strong&gt;From 2016 to 2022, there were 10 464 elective AAA repairs statewide. Since the coding split in 2019, EVAR has comprised ~92% of cases annually. Across 2019 to 2022, there were 6882 EVARs (53 deaths; crude mortality 0.77%) and 625 OSRs (42 deaths; 6.72%). In 2022, RAMR was 0.48% for EVAR and 4.43% for OSR. The highest-volume quartiles performed 55% of statewide cases for both modalities. For OSR, volume was not associated with mortality (ρ=0.15; p=0.27), no discrete volume threshold was identified, and no high- or low-mortality outliers were detected at ≥30 cases. For EVAR, volume correlated positively with crude mortality (ρ=0.36; p&lt;0.001); no robust cut-point emerged; and a small number of high-mortality outliers appeared at the 95% limits and none at 99.8% (≥30 cases). Sensitivity analyses were concordant. The positive EVAR correlation likely reflects higher-risk case-mix at referral centers rather than a detrimental effect of volume.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Conclusions: &lt;/strong&gt;Contemporary elective EVAR in California demonstrates uniformly low mortality with few outliers and no hospital-volume threshold. The OSR outcomes are more variable, yet hospital volume is not associated with mortality. These findings support broad access to EVAR with routine outcomes-based surveillance and suggest that any concentration of open repair should be guided by demonstrated outcomes rather than arbitrary minimum-volume mandates.Clinical ImpactThis study provides actionable guidance for service design and referral. Elective endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) shows uniformly low mortality across hospitals, so access can remain broad; quality efforts should focus on continuous audit and rapid remediation of the rare high-mortality outliers identified by funnel monitoring. Open repair exhibits wider variability without a defensible volume cutoff; therefore, complex or open-eligible cases should be preferentially directed to teams with demonstrated outcomes rather than to centers meeting arbitrary case counts. Programs should formalize escalation and transfer pathways for open repair","PeriodicalId":50210,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Endovascular Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"15266028251403923"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2025-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145783782","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Unique Stent-Graft Modification in Emergency High-Risk Patients for Aortic Arch Pathology. 特殊支架移植技术在主动脉弓病理高危患者中的应用
IF 1.5 2区 医学 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE Pub Date : 2025-12-18 DOI: 10.1177/15266028251396259
Michał Żołnierczuk, Paweł Rynio, Anita Rybicka, Tomasz Jędrzejczak, Jerzy Pacholewicz, Piotr Gutowski, Michał Kargul, Arkadiusz Kazimierczak

Purpose: Endovascular treatment of aortic arch pathologies remains a significant challenge due to the anatomical complexity of the supra-aortic vessels. Traditional approaches, such as custom-made devices (CMDs) or hybrid procedures, are often limited by delayed availability, invasiveness, and long production or preparation times. Physician-modified stent-grafts (PMSGs) offer a viable alternative for high-risk emergency patients requiring urgent intervention.

Methods: This single-center study evaluated the safety and efficacy of a novel PMSG technique in 18 patients with acute aortic syndromes, including ruptured or impending rupture of aneurysms and complicated dissections. Patients were selected according to defined inclusion criteria, excluding those eligible for alternative surgical or endovascular procedures. Stent-graft modifications-including single-fenestrated and triple-fenestrated grafts-were performed on the Medtronic Valiant platform using patient-specific, sterile 3-dimensional-printed templates. Technical success, early outcomes, and medium-term follow-up data were assessed, with particular attention to neurological complications, endoleaks (EL), and survival, using serial computed tomography angiography.

Results: Early outcomes demonstrated 100% technical success (18 of 18 patients), with no deaths during the first 30-day postoperative period. Four patients experienced non-disabling strokes. One patient required surgical revision for access-site bleeding, and another developed transient spinal cord ischemia. Mid-term follow-up (median = 43 months) revealed an overall survival rate of 83%, with 3 deaths unrelated to the endovascular procedure. Endoleaks were detected in 5 patients. No cases of graft infection or migration were reported.

Conclusion: Physician-modified stent-grafts represent a feasible and effective treatment option for high-risk patients with aortic arch pathologies requiring urgent intervention. The technique enables tailored management in cases where off-the-shelf solutions or custom devices are unavailable, offering high technical success and promising mid-term durability. Further multicenter studies are warranted to confirm long-term safety and refine procedural techniques.Clinical ImpactThis study shows that physician-modified stent grafts (PMSGs) are a feasible option for high-risk patients who cannot undergo open surgery or access custom-made devices. Using 3D-printed templates improves fenestration accuracy and arterial alignment. The 100% technical success rate and absence of early mortality indicate strong short-term effectiveness. However, the off-label nature of the technique and lack of standardization require experienced teams and careful patient selection. If confirmed in larger cohorts, PMSGs could become part of emergency aortic treatment protocols and influence future device development.

目的:由于主动脉上血管的解剖复杂性,主动脉弓病变的血管内治疗仍然是一个重大的挑战。传统的方法,如定制设备(cmd)或混合程序,通常受到延迟可用性、侵入性和较长的生产或准备时间的限制。医生改良支架移植物(pmsg)为需要紧急干预的高危急诊患者提供了一个可行的选择。方法:这项单中心研究评估了一种新型PMSG技术在18例急性主动脉综合征患者中的安全性和有效性,包括动脉瘤破裂或即将破裂和复杂的夹层。根据确定的纳入标准选择患者,排除那些符合替代手术或血管内手术条件的患者。支架移植修饰(包括单孔和三孔移植)在美敦力Valiant平台上使用患者特异性的无菌三维打印模板进行。评估技术成功、早期结果和中期随访数据,特别关注神经系统并发症、内漏(EL)和生存率,使用连续计算机断层血管造影。结果:早期结果显示100%的技术成功(18例患者中有18例),术后前30天无死亡。四名患者经历了非致残性中风。一名患者因通路部位出血需要手术翻修,另一名患者出现短暂性脊髓缺血。中期随访(中位= 43个月)显示总生存率为83%,其中3例死亡与血管内手术无关。5例患者检出内漏。无移植物感染或移植物迁移病例报道。结论:对于需要紧急干预的高危主动脉弓病变患者,医师改良支架移植是一种可行且有效的治疗选择。在没有现成解决方案或定制设备的情况下,该技术可以实现量身定制的管理,提供了很高的技术成功率和有希望的中期耐用性。需要进一步的多中心研究来确认长期安全性并完善手术技术。临床影响本研究表明,对于不能接受开放手术或使用定制设备的高危患者,医师改良支架移植(PMSGs)是一种可行的选择。使用3d打印模板可提高开窗精度和动脉对齐。100%的技术成功率和没有早期死亡表明短期效果很好。然而,该技术的标签外性质和缺乏标准化需要有经验的团队和仔细的患者选择。如果在更大的队列中得到证实,pmsg可能成为紧急主动脉治疗方案的一部分,并影响未来设备的发展。
{"title":"Unique Stent-Graft Modification in Emergency High-Risk Patients for Aortic Arch Pathology.","authors":"Michał Żołnierczuk, Paweł Rynio, Anita Rybicka, Tomasz Jędrzejczak, Jerzy Pacholewicz, Piotr Gutowski, Michał Kargul, Arkadiusz Kazimierczak","doi":"10.1177/15266028251396259","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15266028251396259","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Endovascular treatment of aortic arch pathologies remains a significant challenge due to the anatomical complexity of the supra-aortic vessels. Traditional approaches, such as custom-made devices (CMDs) or hybrid procedures, are often limited by delayed availability, invasiveness, and long production or preparation times. Physician-modified stent-grafts (PMSGs) offer a viable alternative for high-risk emergency patients requiring urgent intervention.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-center study evaluated the safety and efficacy of a novel PMSG technique in 18 patients with acute aortic syndromes, including ruptured or impending rupture of aneurysms and complicated dissections. Patients were selected according to defined inclusion criteria, excluding those eligible for alternative surgical or endovascular procedures. Stent-graft modifications-including single-fenestrated and triple-fenestrated grafts-were performed on the Medtronic Valiant platform using patient-specific, sterile 3-dimensional-printed templates. Technical success, early outcomes, and medium-term follow-up data were assessed, with particular attention to neurological complications, endoleaks (EL), and survival, using serial computed tomography angiography.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Early outcomes demonstrated 100% technical success (18 of 18 patients), with no deaths during the first 30-day postoperative period. Four patients experienced non-disabling strokes. One patient required surgical revision for access-site bleeding, and another developed transient spinal cord ischemia. Mid-term follow-up (median = 43 months) revealed an overall survival rate of 83%, with 3 deaths unrelated to the endovascular procedure. Endoleaks were detected in 5 patients. No cases of graft infection or migration were reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Physician-modified stent-grafts represent a feasible and effective treatment option for high-risk patients with aortic arch pathologies requiring urgent intervention. The technique enables tailored management in cases where off-the-shelf solutions or custom devices are unavailable, offering high technical success and promising mid-term durability. Further multicenter studies are warranted to confirm long-term safety and refine procedural techniques.Clinical ImpactThis study shows that physician-modified stent grafts (PMSGs) are a feasible option for high-risk patients who cannot undergo open surgery or access custom-made devices. Using 3D-printed templates improves fenestration accuracy and arterial alignment. The 100% technical success rate and absence of early mortality indicate strong short-term effectiveness. However, the off-label nature of the technique and lack of standardization require experienced teams and careful patient selection. If confirmed in larger cohorts, PMSGs could become part of emergency aortic treatment protocols and influence future device development.</p>","PeriodicalId":50210,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Endovascular Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"15266028251396259"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2025-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145776169","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Diagnosis and Treatment of an Ovarian Artery Aneurysm Rupture: A Case Report and Literature Review. 卵巢动脉瘤破裂的诊断与治疗:1例报告及文献复习。
IF 1.5 2区 医学 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE Pub Date : 2025-12-18 DOI: 10.1177/15266028251397793
Zacharie Gagné, Gregory Davies, Tin Li, Shaista Riaz, Hooman Hennessey

We present a rare case of a 31-year-old female, gravida 7, para 3, who presented to the emergency department 2 days following an uncomplicated vaginal delivery with complaints of abdominal pain radiating to the left flank. Multiphasic computed tomography and conventional angiography subsequently confirmed the rupture of a left ovarian artery aneurysm. The patient was treated with transcatheter arterial embolization (TAE) using microcoils and was discharged from the hospital after 2 days. A review of the English literature revealed only 44 other documented cases of ovarian artery aneurysm ruptures, with most of these cases being associated with pregnancy. Transcatheter arterial embolization has emerged as the preferred treatment for pelvic hemorrhage and is as effective as surgery, while also reducing patient complications. Spontaneous rupture of an ovarian artery aneurysm should be considered in the differential diagnosis of multiparous postpartum women presenting clinically with hypotension or shock in the absence of another identifiable source of bleeding.Clinical ImpactThis article provides a detailed review of the pathophysiology underlying the formation and rupture of ovarian artery aneurysms, their clinical presentation, and the available treatment options, with the goal of helping physicians identify and manage this rare condition.

我们报告一例罕见的病例,31岁女性,妊娠7期,第3段,在阴道分娩后2天以腹痛放射至左侧就诊于急诊科。多相计算机断层扫描和常规血管造影随后证实左侧卵巢动脉瘤破裂。患者采用微线圈经导管动脉栓塞术(TAE)治疗,2天后出院。对英国文献的回顾显示,只有44例其他记录在案的卵巢动脉瘤破裂病例,其中大多数与怀孕有关。经导管动脉栓塞已成为盆腔出血的首选治疗方法,与手术一样有效,同时也减少了患者的并发症。在临床上表现为低血压或休克而没有其他可识别的出血来源的多胎产后妇女的鉴别诊断中,应考虑卵巢动脉瘤自发性破裂。临床影响本文详细回顾了卵巢动脉瘤形成和破裂的病理生理学,其临床表现,以及可用的治疗方案,目的是帮助医生识别和治疗这种罕见的疾病。
{"title":"Diagnosis and Treatment of an Ovarian Artery Aneurysm Rupture: A Case Report and Literature Review.","authors":"Zacharie Gagné, Gregory Davies, Tin Li, Shaista Riaz, Hooman Hennessey","doi":"10.1177/15266028251397793","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15266028251397793","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We present a rare case of a 31-year-old female, gravida 7, para 3, who presented to the emergency department 2 days following an uncomplicated vaginal delivery with complaints of abdominal pain radiating to the left flank. Multiphasic computed tomography and conventional angiography subsequently confirmed the rupture of a left ovarian artery aneurysm. The patient was treated with transcatheter arterial embolization (TAE) using microcoils and was discharged from the hospital after 2 days. A review of the English literature revealed only 44 other documented cases of ovarian artery aneurysm ruptures, with most of these cases being associated with pregnancy. Transcatheter arterial embolization has emerged as the preferred treatment for pelvic hemorrhage and is as effective as surgery, while also reducing patient complications. Spontaneous rupture of an ovarian artery aneurysm should be considered in the differential diagnosis of multiparous postpartum women presenting clinically with hypotension or shock in the absence of another identifiable source of bleeding.Clinical ImpactThis article provides a detailed review of the pathophysiology underlying the formation and rupture of ovarian artery aneurysms, their clinical presentation, and the available treatment options, with the goal of helping physicians identify and manage this rare condition.</p>","PeriodicalId":50210,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Endovascular Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"15266028251397793"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2025-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145776196","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Suprainguinal Fascia Iliaca Block for Surgical Anesthesia in Endovenous Radiofrequency Ablation. 腹股沟上筋膜髂阻滞用于静脉内射频消融手术麻醉。
IF 1.5 2区 医学 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE Pub Date : 2025-12-17 DOI: 10.1177/15266028251401100
Ufuk Demir, Öztürk Taşkın, Üzeyir Yılmaz, Ayşe Yılmaz, Büşra Tanyıldızı Küçük
{"title":"Suprainguinal Fascia Iliaca Block for Surgical Anesthesia in Endovenous Radiofrequency Ablation.","authors":"Ufuk Demir, Öztürk Taşkın, Üzeyir Yılmaz, Ayşe Yılmaz, Büşra Tanyıldızı Küçük","doi":"10.1177/15266028251401100","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15266028251401100","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":50210,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Endovascular Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"15266028251401100"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2025-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145769753","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
From Coronary Arteries to Lower Limbs: Advances in Drug-Eluting Bioresorbable Scaffolds for Treating Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia. 从冠状动脉到下肢:药物洗脱生物可吸收支架治疗慢性肢体缺血的进展。
IF 1.5 2区 医学 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE Pub Date : 2025-12-15 DOI: 10.1177/15266028251399144
Andrew Holden, Ramon Varcoe, Brian DeRubertis, Hector M Garcia-Garcia, Yazan Khatib, Chris Metzger, Prakash Krishnan, Ian Cawich, Steven Kum, Anette Popiel, Richard Rapoza, Jennifer M Jones-McMeans, Sahil Parikh

As the most severe manifestation of peripheral arterial disease, patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) are at significant risk for adverse outcomes, such as amputation and mortality. A standard endovascular therapy for below the knee (BTK) intervention, percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA), has shown high rates of restenosis and frequent re-interventions. Alternative technologies, such as drug-eluting stents (DES) and drug-coated balloons, have not consistently demonstrated superiority over PTA and have not received US regulatory approval. Esprit BTK, recently approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), is a novel drug-eluting resorbable scaffold (DRS) designed for treatment of infrapopliteal artery disease in patients with CLTI. The Esprit BTK DRS has shown superior efficacy and non-inferior safety compared with PTA. This technology is an evolution of the coronary Absorb bioresorbable vascular scaffold (BVS) sought to improve upon the limitations of metallic DES. Coronary use of Absorb BVS provided both technical and clinical insights that informed the design and adaptation of bioresorbable scaffolds for infrapopliteal applications. Findings from the ABSORB coronary clinical trials and Absorb BTK studies for treating infrapopliteal atherosclerotic disease, including procedural and implantation best practices, were incorporated and implemented into the development of the Esprit BTK DRS and LIFE-BTK randomized controlled trial protocol.Clinical ImpactThe Esprit BTK drug-eluting resorbable scaffold is the first Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved bioresorbable device for infrapopliteal artery disease in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI). In the LIFE-BTK randomized trial, it demonstrated superior efficacy and non-inferior safety versus angioplasty. Designed with thinner struts and optimized for BTK anatomy, Esprit BTK incorporates learnings from Absorb bioresorbable vascular scaffold and emphasizes intravascular imaging and procedural best practices. These innovations address clinical challenges, offering clinicians a novel, evidence-based alternative to percutaneous transluminal angioplasty with the potential to improve long-term outcomes in patients with CLTI.

作为外周动脉疾病最严重的表现,慢性肢体威胁性缺血(CLTI)患者存在截肢和死亡等不良结局的显著风险。经皮腔内血管成形术(PTA)是膝关节以下(BTK)介入治疗的标准血管内治疗方法,但其再狭窄发生率高,再介入频率高。替代技术,如药物洗脱支架(DES)和药物涂层气球,并没有始终表现出优于PTA的优势,也没有得到美国监管机构的批准。Esprit BTK最近获得美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)批准,是一种新型药物洗脱可吸收支架(DRS),设计用于治疗CLTI患者的腘下动脉疾病。与PTA相比,Esprit BTK DRS具有优越的疗效和良好的安全性。这项技术是冠状动脉吸收生物可吸收血管支架(BVS)的发展,旨在改善金属DES的局限性。冠状动脉吸收生物可吸收血管支架的使用提供了技术和临床见解,为髌下应用的生物可吸收支架的设计和适应提供了信息。吸收冠状动脉临床试验和吸收BTK治疗膝下动脉粥样硬化疾病的研究结果,包括手术和植入的最佳实践,被纳入并实施到Esprit BTK DRS和LIFE-BTK随机对照试验方案的开发中。Esprit BTK药物洗脱可吸收支架是美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)批准的首个用于治疗慢性肢体缺血(CLTI)患者的膝下动脉疾病的生物可吸收装置。在LIFE-BTK随机试验中,与血管成形术相比,它表现出优越的疗效和良好的安全性。Esprit BTK采用了更薄的支撑结构,并针对BTK的解剖结构进行了优化,Esprit BTK结合了吸收生物可吸收血管支架的知识,并强调了血管内成像和手术的最佳实践。这些创新解决了临床挑战,为临床医生提供了一种新的、以证据为基础的经皮腔内血管成形术的替代方案,有可能改善CLTI患者的长期预后。
{"title":"From Coronary Arteries to Lower Limbs: Advances in Drug-Eluting Bioresorbable Scaffolds for Treating Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia.","authors":"Andrew Holden, Ramon Varcoe, Brian DeRubertis, Hector M Garcia-Garcia, Yazan Khatib, Chris Metzger, Prakash Krishnan, Ian Cawich, Steven Kum, Anette Popiel, Richard Rapoza, Jennifer M Jones-McMeans, Sahil Parikh","doi":"10.1177/15266028251399144","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15266028251399144","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>As the most severe manifestation of peripheral arterial disease, patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) are at significant risk for adverse outcomes, such as amputation and mortality. A standard endovascular therapy for below the knee (BTK) intervention, percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA), has shown high rates of restenosis and frequent re-interventions. Alternative technologies, such as drug-eluting stents (DES) and drug-coated balloons, have not consistently demonstrated superiority over PTA and have not received US regulatory approval. Esprit BTK, recently approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), is a novel drug-eluting resorbable scaffold (DRS) designed for treatment of infrapopliteal artery disease in patients with CLTI. The Esprit BTK DRS has shown superior efficacy and non-inferior safety compared with PTA. This technology is an evolution of the coronary Absorb bioresorbable vascular scaffold (BVS) sought to improve upon the limitations of metallic DES. Coronary use of Absorb BVS provided both technical and clinical insights that informed the design and adaptation of bioresorbable scaffolds for infrapopliteal applications. Findings from the ABSORB coronary clinical trials and Absorb BTK studies for treating infrapopliteal atherosclerotic disease, including procedural and implantation best practices, were incorporated and implemented into the development of the Esprit BTK DRS and LIFE-BTK randomized controlled trial protocol.Clinical ImpactThe Esprit BTK drug-eluting resorbable scaffold is the first Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved bioresorbable device for infrapopliteal artery disease in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI). In the LIFE-BTK randomized trial, it demonstrated superior efficacy and non-inferior safety versus angioplasty. Designed with thinner struts and optimized for BTK anatomy, Esprit BTK incorporates learnings from Absorb bioresorbable vascular scaffold and emphasizes intravascular imaging and procedural best practices. These innovations address clinical challenges, offering clinicians a novel, evidence-based alternative to percutaneous transluminal angioplasty with the potential to improve long-term outcomes in patients with CLTI.</p>","PeriodicalId":50210,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Endovascular Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"15266028251399144"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2025-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145764414","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Novel technique of innerbranch stent-grafts for common iliac artery aneurysm ensured blood flow to the pelvic region and lower extremities. 髂总动脉瘤分支内支架移植新技术保证了骨盆和下肢的血流。
IF 1.5 2区 医学 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE Pub Date : 2025-12-12 DOI: 10.1177/15266028251397301
Hiroaki Kaneyama, Kiyoshi Koizumi, Kenichi Hashizume, Manabu Misu, Koki Ikebata, Takashi Hashimoto, Hideyuki Shimizu

We report a technique to preserve the internal iliac artery (IIA) using a physician-modified contralateral limb (PMCL) with an inner branch stent-graft (IBS) for patients with common iliac artery aneurysms not suitable for commercially-available iliac branch devices (cIBDs). A fenestration was created in the tapered or 13 mm segment of an Endurant II contralateral limb, and an IBS-2 mm larger in diameter than the fenestration-was inserted and deployed with 15-20 mm inside the PMCL and 5 mm externally. The IBS was fixed at three points in parallel to the limb. A preloaded wire was inserted, and the system reloaded and implanted. Two patients were treated using this method, with the IIA stent-graft deployed into the superior gluteal artery. One had a fenestration in the tapered segment, the other in the 13 mm segment. Follow-up computed tomography showed no endoleaks and satisfactory pelvic perfusion in both cases, with no complications. This technique maintains pelvic and lower extremity blood flow, ensures graft stability, and allows future endovascular reintervention. It may be a valuable alternative for patients for whom cIBDs are not indicated.Clinical ImpactPreserving the internal iliac artery is essential, but maintaining adequate lower-extremity perfusion during treatment of common iliac artery aneurysms is equally important. Our physician-modified contralateral limb with an inner branch stent-graft successfully achieved both goals in two cases. The construct also maintained its shape without deformation and resisted migration, even when additional endovascular procedures involved the inner branch stent-graft.

我们报道了一种保留髂内动脉(IIA)的技术,该技术使用医师改良的对侧肢体(PMCL)和内分支支架移植物(IBS)来治疗不适合市售髂分支装置(cibd)的普通髂动脉瘤患者。在Endurant II对侧肢的锥形或13mm的部分上创建一个开窗,并插入一个直径比开窗大2mm的ibs,在PMCL内部15- 20mm,外部5mm。将IBS固定在与肢体平行的三个点上。插入预加载的导线,然后重新加载并植入系统。2例患者采用这种方法,将IIA支架植入臀上动脉。一个在锥形段有开窗,另一个在13毫米段。随访计算机断层扫描显示,两例患者均未见腔内渗漏,骨盆灌注良好,无并发症。该技术维持盆腔和下肢的血流量,确保移植物的稳定性,并允许未来血管内再介入治疗。对于不需要cibd的患者来说,这可能是一个有价值的选择。临床影响保留髂内动脉是必要的,但在治疗髂总动脉瘤时保持足够的下肢灌注同样重要。我们的医生改良的对侧肢体内支支架移植成功地实现了这两个目标。即使当额外的血管内手术涉及内支支架移植物时,该结构也能保持其形状而不变形和抵抗迁移。
{"title":"Novel technique of innerbranch stent-grafts for common iliac artery aneurysm ensured blood flow to the pelvic region and lower extremities.","authors":"Hiroaki Kaneyama, Kiyoshi Koizumi, Kenichi Hashizume, Manabu Misu, Koki Ikebata, Takashi Hashimoto, Hideyuki Shimizu","doi":"10.1177/15266028251397301","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15266028251397301","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We report a technique to preserve the internal iliac artery (IIA) using a physician-modified contralateral limb (PMCL) with an inner branch stent-graft (IBS) for patients with common iliac artery aneurysms not suitable for commercially-available iliac branch devices (cIBDs). A fenestration was created in the tapered or 13 mm segment of an Endurant II contralateral limb, and an IBS-2 mm larger in diameter than the fenestration-was inserted and deployed with 15-20 mm inside the PMCL and 5 mm externally. The IBS was fixed at three points in parallel to the limb. A preloaded wire was inserted, and the system reloaded and implanted. Two patients were treated using this method, with the IIA stent-graft deployed into the superior gluteal artery. One had a fenestration in the tapered segment, the other in the 13 mm segment. Follow-up computed tomography showed no endoleaks and satisfactory pelvic perfusion in both cases, with no complications. This technique maintains pelvic and lower extremity blood flow, ensures graft stability, and allows future endovascular reintervention. It may be a valuable alternative for patients for whom cIBDs are not indicated.Clinical ImpactPreserving the internal iliac artery is essential, but maintaining adequate lower-extremity perfusion during treatment of common iliac artery aneurysms is equally important. Our physician-modified contralateral limb with an inner branch stent-graft successfully achieved both goals in two cases. The construct also maintained its shape without deformation and resisted migration, even when additional endovascular procedures involved the inner branch stent-graft.</p>","PeriodicalId":50210,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Endovascular Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"15266028251397301"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2025-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145745591","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Combined Endovascular Treatment of False Aneurysm of Brachiocephalic Artery With Impending Rupture. 假性头臂动脉动脉瘤即将破裂的联合血管内治疗。
IF 1.5 2区 医学 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE Pub Date : 2025-12-10 DOI: 10.1177/15266028251397773
Shogo Sakurai, Masazumi Watanabe

This case report describes a false aneurysm of the brachiocephalic artery in a 78-year-old woman who presented at our hospital with dyspnea and chest pain caused by impending rupture. The infectious aneurysm was strongly suspected. Brachiocephalic artery aneurysms are very rare but life-threatening, and are difficult to treat especially in cases of infected false aneurysms. The treatment option performed on the patient was intended to save the patient's life, despite the risk of worsening the infection. This study indicated that the combined use of endovascular and bypass surgery is an effective strategy for the treatment of brachiocephalic false aneurysms.Clinical ImpactWe believe that our study makes a significant contribution to the literature because it describes how the treatment option of combining endovascular treatment and artificial vessel bypass surgery successfully saved the patient's life despite the risk of worsening infection. We believe that this paper will be of interest to the readership of your journal because currently there are no clear guidelines in the literature for the treatment of false aneurysms of the brachiocephalic artery, so case reports are valuable references for cardiologists.

本病例报告描述了一位78岁女性的假头臂动脉动脉瘤,她因即将破裂而出现呼吸困难和胸痛。强烈怀疑是感染性动脉瘤。头臂动脉瘤非常罕见,但危及生命,治疗困难,特别是感染的假动脉瘤。对患者进行的治疗方案旨在挽救患者的生命,尽管存在感染恶化的风险。本研究提示血管内搭桥手术联合应用是治疗头臂假性动脉瘤的有效策略。临床影响我们认为,我们的研究对文献有重大贡献,因为它描述了血管内治疗和人工血管搭桥手术相结合的治疗选择如何在感染恶化的风险下成功挽救了患者的生命。我们相信这篇文章会引起贵刊读者的兴趣,因为目前文献中对于头臂动脉假性动脉瘤的治疗没有明确的指导方针,所以病例报告对心脏病专家来说是有价值的参考。
{"title":"Combined Endovascular Treatment of False Aneurysm of Brachiocephalic Artery With Impending Rupture.","authors":"Shogo Sakurai, Masazumi Watanabe","doi":"10.1177/15266028251397773","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15266028251397773","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This case report describes a false aneurysm of the brachiocephalic artery in a 78-year-old woman who presented at our hospital with dyspnea and chest pain caused by impending rupture. The infectious aneurysm was strongly suspected. Brachiocephalic artery aneurysms are very rare but life-threatening, and are difficult to treat especially in cases of infected false aneurysms. The treatment option performed on the patient was intended to save the patient's life, despite the risk of worsening the infection. This study indicated that the combined use of endovascular and bypass surgery is an effective strategy for the treatment of brachiocephalic false aneurysms.Clinical ImpactWe believe that our study makes a significant contribution to the literature because it describes how the treatment option of combining endovascular treatment and artificial vessel bypass surgery successfully saved the patient's life despite the risk of worsening infection. We believe that this paper will be of interest to the readership of your journal because currently there are no clear guidelines in the literature for the treatment of false aneurysms of the brachiocephalic artery, so case reports are valuable references for cardiologists.</p>","PeriodicalId":50210,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Endovascular Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"15266028251397773"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2025-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145716589","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Journal of Endovascular Therapy
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1