首页 > 最新文献

Journal of Endovascular Therapy最新文献

英文 中文
Six Years' Experience With a Novel Dissection-Specific Stent-Graft to Prevent Distal Stent-Graft-Induced New Entry. 使用新型交叉口特异性支架移植物预防远端支架移植物引发新入口的六年经验。
IF 1.5 2区 医学 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE Pub Date : 2026-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-31 DOI: 10.1177/15266028241257106
Maysam Shehab, Anders Wanhainen, Gustaf Tegler, David Lindstrom, William Yoon, Kevin Mani

Introduction: Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) in chronic dissection is associated with a risk for distal stent-graft-induced new entry (dSINE) in up to a quarter of cases. We assess the mid-term outcome of a novel dissection-specific stent-graft (DSSG), which is a custom-made device based on the Cook Alpha platform, with a modified graft design and a distal endovascular elephant trunk without any supporting stent to reduce the radial force on the dissection membrane at the distal landing zone.

Methods: A retrospective single-center study of chronic dissection patients at high risk of dSINE who received an elective endovascular repair with DSSG from January 2017 to June 2023. The primary outcome is Kaplan-Meier (KM) estimated freedom from dSINE during follow-up. Secondary outcomes included technical success, aortic remodeling, and anatomical evaluation of the distal landing zone in cases with dSINE during follow-up versus those without.

Results: Thirty patients (24 males) with a median age of 66 years [range=31-78] underwent elective TEVAR with the DSSG. The majority, n=27 (90%), had previous aortic repair; 7 (23%) had established connective tissue disease, and 6 (20%) had established dSINE after previous stent-graft implantation as an indication for TEVAR. Technical success was achieved in n=29 (97%). Median follow-up was 38.5 months (4.3-76.4), and KM estimated freedom from dSINE at 1 and 3 years was 95.6% (SE 0.043) and 89% (SE 0.081), respectively Four cases developed dSINE during follow-up. The median distance from the distal stent-graft to the coeliac trunk was 74mm (range=18-123) in the dSINE group versus 26mm (range=0-74) in the non-dSINE group (p=0.049). Median proximal tangential aortic angulation in the distal landing zone was 38.5° (range=26°-50°) in the dSINE group compared to 21° (range=3-61°) in the non-dSINE group (p=0.052).

Conclusions: The Use of a novel DSSG with low radial force for TEVAR in the setting of chronic dissection is safe and feasible, with remodeling outcomes comparable with standard TEVAR. The reduced distal radial force in the DSSG does not eliminate the risk for dSINE over time, with new entries occurring, particularly in cases where the distal landing zone is in a tortuous aortic segment and not close to the coeliac trunk.Clinical ImpactUsing the novel dissection-specific stent-graft with reduced radial force is safe and feasible but does not completely eliminate the risk of dSINE occurring over time. The exact positioning of the distal stent-graft in a straight aortic segment, close to the coeliac trunk, may be of importance to further mitigate the risk.

导言:慢性夹层的胸腔内血管主动脉修复术(TEVAR)与远端支架移植物诱发新入口(dSINE)的风险有关,这种风险高达四分之一的病例。我们评估了一种新型夹层特异性支架移植物(DSSG)的中期效果,该移植物是基于库克阿尔法平台定制的设备,采用了改进的移植物设计和远端血管内象干,没有任何支撑支架,以减少远端着床区夹层膜上的径向力:一项回顾性单中心研究,对象为2017年1月至2023年6月期间接受DSSG选择性血管内修复术的dSINE高风险慢性夹层患者。主要结果是随访期间估计的dSINE自由度Kaplan-Meier(KM)。次要结果包括技术成功率、主动脉重塑以及随访期间有dSINE与无dSINE病例远端着床区的解剖学评估:30名患者(24名男性)接受了使用DSSG的择期TEVAR手术,中位年龄为66岁[范围=31-78]。大多数患者(27 人,占 90%)既往接受过主动脉修补术;7 人(23%)患有结缔组织病,6 人(20%)在既往作为 TEVAR 适应症的支架移植物植入术后确立了 dSINE。29人(97%)获得了技术成功。中位随访时间为 38.5 个月(4.3-76.4 个月),估计 1 年和 3 年后无 dSINE 的 KM 分别为 95.6% (SE 0.043) 和 89% (SE 0.081) 随访期间有 4 例出现 dSINE。dSINE 组远端支架移植物到腹腔干的中位距离为 74 毫米(范围=18-123),而非 dSINE 组为 26 毫米(范围=0-74)(P=0.049)。dSINE组远端着床区主动脉切线角度中位数为38.5°(范围=26°-50°),而非dSINE组为21°(范围=3-61°)(P=0.052):结论:在慢性夹层情况下使用桡侧力较低的新型 DSSG 进行 TEVAR 是安全可行的,其重塑效果与标准 TEVAR 相当。DSSG远端桡侧力的降低并不能消除随着时间推移出现dSINE的风险,尤其是在远端着床区位于迂曲主动脉段且不靠近腹腔干的病例中,会出现新的入口:临床影响:使用新型夹层专用支架移植物并减少桡侧力是安全可行的,但并不能完全消除随着时间推移出现 dSINE 的风险。将远端支架移植物精确定位在靠近腹腔干的平直主动脉段可能对进一步降低风险非常重要。
{"title":"Six Years' Experience With a Novel Dissection-Specific Stent-Graft to Prevent Distal Stent-Graft-Induced New Entry.","authors":"Maysam Shehab, Anders Wanhainen, Gustaf Tegler, David Lindstrom, William Yoon, Kevin Mani","doi":"10.1177/15266028241257106","DOIUrl":"10.1177/15266028241257106","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) in chronic dissection is associated with a risk for distal stent-graft-induced new entry (dSINE) in up to a quarter of cases. We assess the mid-term outcome of a novel dissection-specific stent-graft (DSSG), which is a custom-made device based on the Cook Alpha platform, with a modified graft design and a distal endovascular elephant trunk without any supporting stent to reduce the radial force on the dissection membrane at the distal landing zone.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective single-center study of chronic dissection patients at high risk of dSINE who received an elective endovascular repair with DSSG from January 2017 to June 2023. The primary outcome is Kaplan-Meier (KM) estimated freedom from dSINE during follow-up. Secondary outcomes included technical success, aortic remodeling, and anatomical evaluation of the distal landing zone in cases with dSINE during follow-up versus those without.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty patients (24 males) with a median age of 66 years [range=31-78] underwent elective TEVAR with the DSSG. The majority, n=27 (90%), had previous aortic repair; 7 (23%) had established connective tissue disease, and 6 (20%) had established dSINE after previous stent-graft implantation as an indication for TEVAR. Technical success was achieved in n=29 (97%). Median follow-up was 38.5 months (4.3-76.4), and KM estimated freedom from dSINE at 1 and 3 years was 95.6% (SE 0.043) and 89% (SE 0.081), respectively Four cases developed dSINE during follow-up. The median distance from the distal stent-graft to the coeliac trunk was 74mm (range=18-123) in the dSINE group versus 26mm (range=0-74) in the non-dSINE group (p=0.049). Median proximal tangential aortic angulation in the distal landing zone was 38.5° (range=26°-50°) in the dSINE group compared to 21° (range=3-61°) in the non-dSINE group (p=0.052).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The Use of a novel DSSG with low radial force for TEVAR in the setting of chronic dissection is safe and feasible, with remodeling outcomes comparable with standard TEVAR. The reduced distal radial force in the DSSG does not eliminate the risk for dSINE over time, with new entries occurring, particularly in cases where the distal landing zone is in a tortuous aortic segment and not close to the coeliac trunk.Clinical ImpactUsing the novel dissection-specific stent-graft with reduced radial force is safe and feasible but does not completely eliminate the risk of dSINE occurring over time. The exact positioning of the distal stent-graft in a straight aortic segment, close to the coeliac trunk, may be of importance to further mitigate the risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":50210,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Endovascular Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"397-405"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12804415/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141181389","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Right Anterior Oblique-Based Approach for Managing Wire Wrap During Fenestrated TEVAR. 右前斜入路处理开窗TEVAR中钢丝包裹。
IF 1.5 2区 医学 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE Pub Date : 2026-01-30 DOI: 10.1177/15266028261418847
Miguel Godeiro Fernandez, Grace Carvajal Mulatti, Lucas Portela Tavares, Walter Campos, José Siqueira de Araújo Filho, Nelson De Luccia, André Brito-Queiroz

Purpose: To describe a standardized technique for managing "wire wrap" during the implantation of fenestrated endografts in the aortic arch. This approach aims to enhance wire position predictability, reduce unnecessary device manipulations, and improve procedural safety in fenestrated thoracic endovascular aortic repair (f-TEVAR).

Technique: The technique is illustrated through 3 representative cases, including a customized triple-wide scallop endograft with a single fenestration featuring a preloaded guidewire, as well as 2 additional physician-modified endograft cases. The procedure begins with detailed preoperative imaging to plan graft selection and positioning. A through-and-through wire system is employed, with careful advancement of the delivery system into the descending thoracic aorta. We distinguish 3 possible scenarios in right anterior oblique fluoroscopy regarding wire position: guidewire aligned, graft positioned posterior to the wire, or graft positioned anterior to the wire. Specific rotational maneuvers-clockwise or counterclockwise-are performed in the descending thoracic aorta to resolve wire wrapping. Once corrected, the fenestration aligns precisely with the targeted supra-aortic branch for graft deployment.

Conclusion: The systematic approach to addressing "wire wrap" during f-TEVAR minimizes embolization and device distortion risks while optimizing procedural efficiency. This reproducible technique provides a valuable tool for advancing endovascular repair in challenging aortic arch pathologies.Clinical ImpactThis standardized technique for managing "wire wrap" during fenestrated thoracic endovascular aortic repair provides a reproducible and practical approach to a well-recognized intraoperative challenge. By systematizing wire handling, the technique enhances procedural safety and minimizes unplanned maneuvers that may increase operative time and radiation exposure while also facilitating device alignment and deployment in demanding scenarios. The innovation lies in offering a simple, easily adoptable strategy that can be consistently applied across operators and centers, supporting safer dissemination of complex endovascular techniques and promoting more predictable outcomes in advanced aortic repair.

目的:描述一种在主动脉弓开窗内移植物植入过程中处理“钢丝包裹”的标准化技术。该方法旨在提高导线位置的可预测性,减少不必要的设备操作,并提高开窗胸血管内主动脉修复(f-TEVAR)的手术安全性。技术:该技术通过3例有代表性的病例来说明,包括一个定制的三宽扇贝内移植物,带有预载导丝的单开窗,以及另外2个医生修改的内移植物病例。手术开始于详细的术前成像,以计划移植物的选择和定位。采用贯穿式导线系统,小心地将输送系统推进至胸降主动脉。在右前斜透视中,我们区分了三种可能的情况:导丝对齐、移植物位于导丝后方或移植物位于导丝前方。在胸降主动脉中进行顺时针或逆时针的特定旋转操作,以解决钢丝缠绕问题。校正后,开窗与目标主动脉上分支精确对齐,便于移植物部署。结论:系统解决f-TEVAR中“钢丝缠绕”的方法可以最大限度地降低栓塞和器械扭曲风险,同时优化手术效率。这种可重复的技术为推进具有挑战性的主动脉弓病变的血管内修复提供了宝贵的工具。临床影响:在开窗胸腔血管内主动脉修复术中,这种标准化的“钢丝缠绕”处理技术为术中公认的挑战提供了一种可重复且实用的方法。通过将导线处理系统化,该技术提高了操作安全性,最大限度地减少了可能增加操作时间和辐射暴露的计划外操作,同时也促进了设备在要求苛刻的情况下的对准和部署。创新之处在于提供了一种简单、易于采用的策略,可以在操作员和中心之间持续应用,支持更安全地传播复杂的血管内技术,并在晚期主动脉修复中促进更可预测的结果。
{"title":"Right Anterior Oblique-Based Approach for Managing Wire Wrap During Fenestrated TEVAR.","authors":"Miguel Godeiro Fernandez, Grace Carvajal Mulatti, Lucas Portela Tavares, Walter Campos, José Siqueira de Araújo Filho, Nelson De Luccia, André Brito-Queiroz","doi":"10.1177/15266028261418847","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15266028261418847","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To describe a standardized technique for managing \"wire wrap\" during the implantation of fenestrated endografts in the aortic arch. This approach aims to enhance wire position predictability, reduce unnecessary device manipulations, and improve procedural safety in fenestrated thoracic endovascular aortic repair (f-TEVAR).</p><p><strong>Technique: </strong>The technique is illustrated through 3 representative cases, including a customized triple-wide scallop endograft with a single fenestration featuring a preloaded guidewire, as well as 2 additional physician-modified endograft cases. The procedure begins with detailed preoperative imaging to plan graft selection and positioning. A through-and-through wire system is employed, with careful advancement of the delivery system into the descending thoracic aorta. We distinguish 3 possible scenarios in right anterior oblique fluoroscopy regarding wire position: guidewire aligned, graft positioned posterior to the wire, or graft positioned anterior to the wire. Specific rotational maneuvers-clockwise or counterclockwise-are performed in the descending thoracic aorta to resolve wire wrapping. Once corrected, the fenestration aligns precisely with the targeted supra-aortic branch for graft deployment.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The systematic approach to addressing \"wire wrap\" during f-TEVAR minimizes embolization and device distortion risks while optimizing procedural efficiency. This reproducible technique provides a valuable tool for advancing endovascular repair in challenging aortic arch pathologies.Clinical ImpactThis standardized technique for managing \"wire wrap\" during fenestrated thoracic endovascular aortic repair provides a reproducible and practical approach to a well-recognized intraoperative challenge. By systematizing wire handling, the technique enhances procedural safety and minimizes unplanned maneuvers that may increase operative time and radiation exposure while also facilitating device alignment and deployment in demanding scenarios. The innovation lies in offering a simple, easily adoptable strategy that can be consistently applied across operators and centers, supporting safer dissemination of complex endovascular techniques and promoting more predictable outcomes in advanced aortic repair.</p>","PeriodicalId":50210,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Endovascular Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"15266028261418847"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2026-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146094656","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Endovascular Treatment of a Persistent Sciatic Artery Aneurysm Complicated by Lower Extremity Arterial Embolism. 持续性坐骨动脉瘤合并下肢动脉栓塞的血管内治疗。
IF 1.5 2区 医学 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE Pub Date : 2026-01-30 DOI: 10.1177/15266028261417148
Wenfei Guan, Peng Jiang, Yongpan Cui, Zihan Zhang, Jian He, Kewei Wang, Jianfeng Sun, Fei Mei

Persistent sciatic artery (PSA) is a rare congenital vascular abnormality associated with the embryonic development of the iliac, common femoral, and superficial femoral arteries. Most cases of PSA are incidentally detected and are generally asymptomatic. However, PSA can present as chronic pain, such as neuralgia from aneurysmal dilatation compressing the sciatic nerve, or ischemic pain due to thrombus embolization from the aneurysm. In severe cases, aneurysm rupture poses a significant threat to both limb and life. Timely detection and appropriate intervention are therefore crucial. This article explores the clinical characteristics and treatment strategies of PSA, exemplified through the management of a patient with PSA complicated by distal embolization.Clinical ImpactThis study underscores the importance of simultaneously addressing both the aneurysm and distal thromboembolism in symptomatic persistent sciatic artery (PSA) cases, rather than treating embolic events alone. It reinforces endovascular repair as a preferred, minimally invasive strategy, reducing surgical trauma and nerve injury risk. For clinicians, this highlights the need for vigilant follow-up and consideration of early combined intervention to prevent recurrence. The innovation lies in demonstrating the efficacy of a staged, hybrid endovascular approach and proposing postural modification as a potential adjunct to slow aneurysm progression, offering a refined management paradigm for this rare condition.

持续性坐骨动脉(PSA)是一种罕见的先天性血管异常,与髂动脉、股总动脉和股浅动脉的胚胎发育有关。大多数PSA病例是偶然发现的,通常无症状。然而,PSA可表现为慢性疼痛,如由动脉瘤扩张压迫坐骨神经引起的神经痛,或由动脉瘤血栓栓塞引起的缺血性疼痛。在严重的情况下,动脉瘤破裂会对肢体和生命造成重大威胁。因此,及时发现和适当干预至关重要。本文探讨了PSA的临床特点和治疗策略,并通过对PSA合并远端栓塞患者的处理为例。本研究强调了在有症状的持续性坐骨动脉(PSA)病例中同时处理动脉瘤和远端血栓栓塞的重要性,而不是单独治疗栓塞事件。它加强了血管内修复作为首选的微创策略,减少了手术创伤和神经损伤的风险。对于临床医生来说,这突出了警惕随访和考虑早期联合干预以防止复发的必要性。创新之处在于证明了分阶段、混合血管内入路的有效性,并提出了姿势调整作为减缓动脉瘤进展的潜在辅助手段,为这种罕见疾病提供了一种完善的管理范例。
{"title":"Endovascular Treatment of a Persistent Sciatic Artery Aneurysm Complicated by Lower Extremity Arterial Embolism.","authors":"Wenfei Guan, Peng Jiang, Yongpan Cui, Zihan Zhang, Jian He, Kewei Wang, Jianfeng Sun, Fei Mei","doi":"10.1177/15266028261417148","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15266028261417148","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Persistent sciatic artery (PSA) is a rare congenital vascular abnormality associated with the embryonic development of the iliac, common femoral, and superficial femoral arteries. Most cases of PSA are incidentally detected and are generally asymptomatic. However, PSA can present as chronic pain, such as neuralgia from aneurysmal dilatation compressing the sciatic nerve, or ischemic pain due to thrombus embolization from the aneurysm. In severe cases, aneurysm rupture poses a significant threat to both limb and life. Timely detection and appropriate intervention are therefore crucial. This article explores the clinical characteristics and treatment strategies of PSA, exemplified through the management of a patient with PSA complicated by distal embolization.Clinical ImpactThis study underscores the importance of simultaneously addressing both the aneurysm and distal thromboembolism in symptomatic persistent sciatic artery (PSA) cases, rather than treating embolic events alone. It reinforces endovascular repair as a preferred, minimally invasive strategy, reducing surgical trauma and nerve injury risk. For clinicians, this highlights the need for vigilant follow-up and consideration of early combined intervention to prevent recurrence. The innovation lies in demonstrating the efficacy of a staged, hybrid endovascular approach and proposing postural modification as a potential adjunct to slow aneurysm progression, offering a refined management paradigm for this rare condition.</p>","PeriodicalId":50210,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Endovascular Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"15266028261417148"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2026-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146094696","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Anatomical Viability of the "Hector Multibranched Thoracic Stent-Graft System" and Connecting Stent for Endovascular Aortic Arch Repair. “Hector多支胸椎支架-移植物系统”及连接支架在血管内主动脉弓修复中的解剖学可行性。
IF 1.5 2区 医学 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE Pub Date : 2026-01-26 DOI: 10.1177/15266028251401192
Nicola Leone, Luigi Alberto Maria Bartolotti, Francesco Andreoli, Mattia Migliari, Andrea Ferri, Pietro Paolo Nicoletti, Roberto Silingardi, Stefano Gennai

Introduction: Endovascular repair of the aortic arch has emerged as an alternative to open surgery, particularly for high-risk and elderly patients. While multibranched endografts have demonstrated technical success, anatomical suitability remains a key limiting factor, especially given the variability of arch anatomy. The aim of the present study is to evaluate the suitability of the Hector multibranch device in a cohort of patients who underwent endovascular treatment for aortic arch's lesions.

Methods: A total of 539 patients were treated between 1999 and 2024, with 79 included in a single-center, retrospective, preclinical study. The suitability for device and its connecting stent was defined according to the manufacturer's instructions for use. Extended suitability was also evaluated, including patients excluded for limiting anatomical criteria. Secondary outcomes were suitable and non-suitable patients' comparison, exclusion causes analysis, and anatomical characteristics associated with suitability. A logistic regression model assessed associations between baseline and non-suitability.

Results: A total of 50 patients (63.2%) were suitable for implantation, raising to 54 (68.4%) by using other available bridging stents. Approximately half of the eligible patients could have been treated using 14 configurations for the analyzed device. The left common carotid artery bridging stent was appropriate for all suitable patients, while the appropriateness rate for the left subclavian artery stent was 92.6%. The odds of non-feasibility increased with proximal landing zone shortening (OR=1.05, p=0.015), whereas each additional millimeter in BCT length increased the odds of suitability by 6% (OR=1.06, p=0.046).

Conclusions: The Hector Stent Graft system coupled with commercially available bridging stents for supra-aortic trunks proved to be feasible for more than two-thirds of patients previously subjected to an endovascular treatment for aortic arch pathologies. The left common carotid artery bridging stent was suitable for all patients, while the one for the left subclavian artery was adequate for 9 out of 10 cases.Clinical ImpactThe Hector™ Stent Graft system shows high anatomical feasibility for endovascular aortic arch repair, with broad applicability using limited configurations. Its design may help minimize supra-aortic-trunks manipulation and facilitate safer, more streamlined procedures to treat the aortic arch pathologies in a complete endovascular fashion.

主动脉弓血管内修复术已成为开放手术的一种替代方法,特别是对于高危和老年患者。虽然多支内移植物在技术上已经取得了成功,但解剖适应性仍然是一个关键的限制因素,特别是考虑到弓解剖的可变性。本研究的目的是评估Hector多分支装置在主动脉弓病变接受血管内治疗的患者队列中的适用性。方法:在1999年至2024年间,共有539例患者接受了治疗,其中79例纳入了单中心、回顾性、临床前研究。器械及其连接支架的适用性根据制造商的使用说明书进行定义。还评估了扩展适用性,包括因限制解剖标准而被排除的患者。次要结局是适宜和不适宜患者的比较、排除原因分析以及与适宜性相关的解剖学特征。逻辑回归模型评估了基线和不适宜性之间的关系。结果:50例(63.2%)患者适合种植,54例(68.4%)患者使用其他可用的桥架。大约一半的符合条件的患者可以使用14种配置的分析设备进行治疗。左侧颈总动脉搭桥支架适用于所有合适的患者,左侧锁骨下动脉支架适合率为92.6%。不可行的几率随着近端着陆区缩短而增加(OR=1.05, p=0.015),而BCT长度每增加一毫米,合适的几率增加6% (OR=1.06, p=0.046)。结论:Hector支架移植系统与市购的主动脉上主干桥接支架相结合,对于超过三分之二的先前接受血管内治疗的主动脉弓病变患者是可行的。左侧颈总动脉桥式支架适用于所有患者,左侧锁骨下动脉桥式支架适用于9 / 10的患者。临床影响Hector™支架系统在血管内主动脉弓修复中具有很高的解剖学可行性,在有限的配置下具有广泛的适用性。它的设计可能有助于减少对主动脉上干的操作,并促进更安全、更简化的手术,以完全的血管内方式治疗主动脉弓病变。
{"title":"Anatomical Viability of the \"Hector Multibranched Thoracic Stent-Graft System\" and Connecting Stent for Endovascular Aortic Arch Repair.","authors":"Nicola Leone, Luigi Alberto Maria Bartolotti, Francesco Andreoli, Mattia Migliari, Andrea Ferri, Pietro Paolo Nicoletti, Roberto Silingardi, Stefano Gennai","doi":"10.1177/15266028251401192","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15266028251401192","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Endovascular repair of the aortic arch has emerged as an alternative to open surgery, particularly for high-risk and elderly patients. While multibranched endografts have demonstrated technical success, anatomical suitability remains a key limiting factor, especially given the variability of arch anatomy. The aim of the present study is to evaluate the suitability of the Hector multibranch device in a cohort of patients who underwent endovascular treatment for aortic arch's lesions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 539 patients were treated between 1999 and 2024, with 79 included in a single-center, retrospective, preclinical study. The suitability for device and its connecting stent was defined according to the manufacturer's instructions for use. Extended suitability was also evaluated, including patients excluded for limiting anatomical criteria. Secondary outcomes were suitable and non-suitable patients' comparison, exclusion causes analysis, and anatomical characteristics associated with suitability. A logistic regression model assessed associations between baseline and non-suitability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 50 patients (63.2%) were suitable for implantation, raising to 54 (68.4%) by using other available bridging stents. Approximately half of the eligible patients could have been treated using 14 configurations for the analyzed device. The left common carotid artery bridging stent was appropriate for all suitable patients, while the appropriateness rate for the left subclavian artery stent was 92.6%. The odds of non-feasibility increased with proximal landing zone shortening (OR=1.05, p=0.015), whereas each additional millimeter in BCT length increased the odds of suitability by 6% (OR=1.06, p=0.046).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The Hector Stent Graft system coupled with commercially available bridging stents for supra-aortic trunks proved to be feasible for more than two-thirds of patients previously subjected to an endovascular treatment for aortic arch pathologies. The left common carotid artery bridging stent was suitable for all patients, while the one for the left subclavian artery was adequate for 9 out of 10 cases.Clinical ImpactThe Hector™ Stent Graft system shows high anatomical feasibility for endovascular aortic arch repair, with broad applicability using limited configurations. Its design may help minimize supra-aortic-trunks manipulation and facilitate safer, more streamlined procedures to treat the aortic arch pathologies in a complete endovascular fashion.</p>","PeriodicalId":50210,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Endovascular Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"15266028251401192"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2026-01-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146053875","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Trends and Scientific Evolution in Endovascular Aneurysm Repair (EVAR) Research: A Comprehensive Bibliometric Study Using VOSviewer. 血管内动脉瘤修复(EVAR)研究的趋势和科学演变:使用VOSviewer的综合文献计量学研究。
IF 1.5 2区 医学 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE Pub Date : 2026-01-25 DOI: 10.1177/15266028251407974
Sinem Nur Sever, Hale Oktem, Yusuf Jamil, Can Pelin

Background: Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) has become a standard treatment for abdominal aortic aneurysms. However, the evolution of EVAR research and its global landscape remain underexplored. This bibliometric analysis aims to map publication trends, identify key contributors, and analyze thematic shifts in EVAR literature over the past three decades.

Methods: Data were collected from the Web of Science Core Collection (SCIE) in May 2025. A total of 4264 original research articles on EVAR were analyzed using VOSviewer for co-authorship, co-citation, and keyword co-occurrence mapping. Citation trends, geographical distribution, and institutional contributions were also assessed.

Results: Research on EVAR showed steady growth, with a peak of 295 publications in 2024. The United States contributed the largest share (33.02%) of publications. Prolific authors such as Schermerhorn and Verhagen, affiliated with leading institutions like Harvard University, played a pivotal role in advancing the field. Keyword analysis revealed a shift from technical terms (e.g., "stent graft") to clinical outcomes (e.g., "reintervention") over time. The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) in EVAR research is emerging as a key focus area.

Conclusion: This study highlights the growth and evolving focus of EVAR research, with a notable shift toward patient-centered outcomes. Despite strong contributions from high-income countries, there is a significant gap in research from low-resource settings. Future directions should include addressing gaps in radiation safety, emergency EVAR applications, and exploring AI-driven clinical decision-making for personalized treatments. Complex EVAR research continues expanding, reflecting guideline evolution and advancing practice in anatomically challenging cases.Clinical ImpactThis bibliometric analysis demonstrates how EVAR has progressed from an emerging minimally invasive technique to a guideline driven standard of care, with a growing emphasis on complex fenestrated and branched procedures. For clinicians, the findings clarify where the evidence base is well established, particularly for standard infrarenal EVAR, and where further caution and innovation are required, including complex anatomies, long term durability, and reintervention risk. By synthesizing influential studies, key guideline milestones, and evolving research themes, this study supports evidence based clinical decision making, improves patient counseling, and reinforces the importance of lifelong surveillance. Its innovation lies in translating three decades of global research into clinically actionable insight.

背景:血管内动脉瘤修复术(EVAR)已成为腹主动脉瘤的标准治疗方法。然而,EVAR研究的演变及其全球格局仍未得到充分探索。这个文献计量分析的目的是绘制出版趋势,确定关键贡献者,并分析在过去三十年EVAR文献的主题变化。方法:数据收集于2025年5月的SCIE (Web of Science Core Collection)。利用VOSviewer对共4264篇EVAR原创研究文章进行合著、共被引和关键词共现映射分析。还评估了引文趋势、地理分布和机构贡献。结果:EVAR研究稳步增长,2024年达到峰值295篇。美国贡献了最大的份额(33.02%)。Schermerhorn和Verhagen等多产的作者,隶属于哈佛大学等领先机构,在推动这一领域的发展方面发挥了关键作用。关键词分析显示,随着时间的推移,从技术术语(如“支架移植”)到临床结果(如“再干预”)的转变。人工智能(AI)在EVAR研究中的集成正成为一个重点研究领域。结论:本研究突出了EVAR研究的发展和发展重点,并显著转向以患者为中心的结果。尽管来自高收入国家的贡献很大,但来自低资源环境的研究存在很大差距。未来的方向应包括解决辐射安全、紧急EVAR应用方面的差距,以及探索人工智能驱动的个性化治疗临床决策。复杂的EVAR研究不断扩大,反映了指南的演变和在解剖学上具有挑战性的病例中推进实践。临床影响本文献计量学分析展示了EVAR是如何从一种新兴的微创技术发展成为指导驱动的护理标准的,并越来越强调复杂的开窗和分支手术。对于临床医生来说,研究结果明确了证据基础的建立,特别是对于标准的肾下EVAR,以及需要进一步谨慎和创新的地方,包括复杂的解剖结构、长期耐久性和再干预风险。通过综合有影响力的研究、关键的指导里程碑和不断发展的研究主题,本研究支持基于证据的临床决策,改善患者咨询,并加强终身监测的重要性。其创新之处在于将三十年的全球研究成果转化为临床可行的见解。
{"title":"Trends and Scientific Evolution in Endovascular Aneurysm Repair (EVAR) Research: A Comprehensive Bibliometric Study Using VOSviewer.","authors":"Sinem Nur Sever, Hale Oktem, Yusuf Jamil, Can Pelin","doi":"10.1177/15266028251407974","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15266028251407974","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) has become a standard treatment for abdominal aortic aneurysms. However, the evolution of EVAR research and its global landscape remain underexplored. This bibliometric analysis aims to map publication trends, identify key contributors, and analyze thematic shifts in EVAR literature over the past three decades.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were collected from the Web of Science Core Collection (SCIE) in May 2025. A total of 4264 original research articles on EVAR were analyzed using VOSviewer for co-authorship, co-citation, and keyword co-occurrence mapping. Citation trends, geographical distribution, and institutional contributions were also assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Research on EVAR showed steady growth, with a peak of 295 publications in 2024. The United States contributed the largest share (33.02%) of publications. Prolific authors such as Schermerhorn and Verhagen, affiliated with leading institutions like Harvard University, played a pivotal role in advancing the field. Keyword analysis revealed a shift from technical terms (e.g., \"stent graft\") to clinical outcomes (e.g., \"reintervention\") over time. The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) in EVAR research is emerging as a key focus area.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study highlights the growth and evolving focus of EVAR research, with a notable shift toward patient-centered outcomes. Despite strong contributions from high-income countries, there is a significant gap in research from low-resource settings. Future directions should include addressing gaps in radiation safety, emergency EVAR applications, and exploring AI-driven clinical decision-making for personalized treatments. Complex EVAR research continues expanding, reflecting guideline evolution and advancing practice in anatomically challenging cases.Clinical ImpactThis bibliometric analysis demonstrates how EVAR has progressed from an emerging minimally invasive technique to a guideline driven standard of care, with a growing emphasis on complex fenestrated and branched procedures. For clinicians, the findings clarify where the evidence base is well established, particularly for standard infrarenal EVAR, and where further caution and innovation are required, including complex anatomies, long term durability, and reintervention risk. By synthesizing influential studies, key guideline milestones, and evolving research themes, this study supports evidence based clinical decision making, improves patient counseling, and reinforces the importance of lifelong surveillance. Its innovation lies in translating three decades of global research into clinically actionable insight.</p>","PeriodicalId":50210,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Endovascular Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"15266028251407974"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2026-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146047362","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Transcatheter Stent Placement for Bilateral Pulmonary Artery Stenosis Due to Idiopathic Fibrosing Mediastinitis. 特发性纤维化纵隔炎所致双侧肺动脉狭窄的经导管支架置入术。
IF 1.5 2区 医学 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE Pub Date : 2026-01-25 DOI: 10.1177/15266028251410798
Ashraf Haidarah, Hussam Alsawidi, Chen Mao, Yuan Feng

Background: Fibrosing mediastinitis is a rare critical disease that encases and compresses mediastinal structures. It is classified as either primary (idiopathic) or secondary based on the underlying etiology. Idiopathic fibrosing mediastinitis presents significant diagnostic challenges, particularly when patients presented with nonspecific symptoms, which may result in misdiagnosis.

Case report: A 53-year-old male patient with bilateral pulmonary artery stenosis due to idiopathic fibrosing mediastinitis was successfully treated with balloon angioplasty and bilateral stent implantation. Subsequent follow-up visits over 3 years demonstrated sustained improvement in the patient's symptoms. Imaging studies confirmed the complete patency of the implanted stents, with no evidence of vascular defects or in-stent restenosis.

Conclusion: Achieving an accurate diagnosis is critical in these cases; furthermore, transcatheter stent implantation is an effective intervention for managing vascular stenosis associated with fibrosing mediastinitis.Clinical ImpactThe rarity of idiopathic fibrosing mediastinitis and the lack of evidence-based treatment strategies make the diagnosis and management challenging. This case emphasizes the importance of endovascular intervention and underscores its role as a viable treatment option for managing similar cases of pulmonary artery stenosis due to fibrosing mediastinitis.

背景:纤维性纵隔炎是一种罕见的危及纵隔结构的疾病。根据潜在的病因分为原发性(特发性)或继发性。特发性纤维化纵隔炎提出了重大的诊断挑战,特别是当患者出现非特异性症状时,这可能导致误诊。病例报告:一例53岁男性患者因特发性纤维化纵隔炎导致双侧肺动脉狭窄,经球囊成形术及双侧支架植入术治疗成功。随后3年的随访显示患者症状持续改善。影像学检查证实植入的支架完全通畅,无血管缺损或支架内再狭窄的证据。结论:在这些病例中,获得准确的诊断至关重要;此外,经导管支架植入术是治疗纤维化性纵隔炎相关血管狭窄的有效干预手段。特发性纤维化性纵隔炎的罕见性和缺乏循证治疗策略使其诊断和治疗具有挑战性。本病例强调了血管内介入的重要性,并强调了其作为治疗由纤维化性纵隔炎引起的类似肺动脉狭窄病例的可行治疗选择的作用。
{"title":"Transcatheter Stent Placement for Bilateral Pulmonary Artery Stenosis Due to Idiopathic Fibrosing Mediastinitis.","authors":"Ashraf Haidarah, Hussam Alsawidi, Chen Mao, Yuan Feng","doi":"10.1177/15266028251410798","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15266028251410798","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Fibrosing mediastinitis is a rare critical disease that encases and compresses mediastinal structures. It is classified as either primary (idiopathic) or secondary based on the underlying etiology. Idiopathic fibrosing mediastinitis presents significant diagnostic challenges, particularly when patients presented with nonspecific symptoms, which may result in misdiagnosis.</p><p><strong>Case report: </strong>A 53-year-old male patient with bilateral pulmonary artery stenosis due to idiopathic fibrosing mediastinitis was successfully treated with balloon angioplasty and bilateral stent implantation. Subsequent follow-up visits over 3 years demonstrated sustained improvement in the patient's symptoms. Imaging studies confirmed the complete patency of the implanted stents, with no evidence of vascular defects or in-stent restenosis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Achieving an accurate diagnosis is critical in these cases; furthermore, transcatheter stent implantation is an effective intervention for managing vascular stenosis associated with fibrosing mediastinitis.Clinical ImpactThe rarity of idiopathic fibrosing mediastinitis and the lack of evidence-based treatment strategies make the diagnosis and management challenging. This case emphasizes the importance of endovascular intervention and underscores its role as a viable treatment option for managing similar cases of pulmonary artery stenosis due to fibrosing mediastinitis.</p>","PeriodicalId":50210,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Endovascular Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"15266028251410798"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2026-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146047288","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Thanks to Reviewers. 感谢评论者。
IF 1.5 2区 医学 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE Pub Date : 2026-01-25 DOI: 10.1177/15266028261420457
{"title":"Thanks to Reviewers.","authors":"","doi":"10.1177/15266028261420457","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15266028261420457","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":50210,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Endovascular Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"15266028261420457"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2026-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146047359","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Endovascular Repair in High-Risk Uncomplicated Type B Aortic Dissection: A Systematic Review and Single-Arm Meta-Analysis. 高危无并发症B型主动脉夹层的血管内修复:系统回顾和单组meta分析
IF 1.5 2区 医学 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE Pub Date : 2026-01-24 DOI: 10.1177/15266028251408978
Milton Sérgio Bohatch Júnior, Beatriz de Melo Silva, Elisabeth Amanda Gomes Soares, Nathalia de Carvalho Dias Miranda, Eduardo Corvello Teixeira, Luccas Marcolin Miranda, Tayrine Mazotti de Moraes, Amanda Fernandes Vidal da Silva, Fernando Reis Neto, Jose Maria Pereira de Godoy, Edwaldo Édner Joviliano
<p><strong>Background: </strong>High-risk features in patients with uncomplicated type B aortic dissection (hrTBAD) have been associated with adverse aortic events and poor prognosis when managed with optimal medical therapy (OMT) alone. However, the role of thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) in this specific subgroup remains controversial. While some studies suggest that early endovascular intervention may improve long-term aortic remodeling and reduce late complications, others emphasize the potential procedural risks and lack of randomized evidence. To address these uncertainties, we conducted a systematic review and single-arm meta-analysis to evaluate the early and long-term outcomes of TEVAR in patients with hrTBAD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library through January 2025 for studies reporting outcomes of TEVAR in hrTBAD. Eligible studies were observational cohorts or trials including patients with hrTBAD, as defined by Society for Vascular Surgery criteria. Data were synthesized using random-effects models. Individual patient data were reconstructed from Kaplan-Meier curves to estimate pooled survival.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ten retrospective cohort studies involving 1971 patients were included. Pooled early mortality was 1.22% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.14%-2.96%), stroke 3.29%, spinal cord ischemia 1.10%, and early Stanford type A dissection 0.40%. Late outcomes showed survival rates of 88.0% at 1 year, 84.0% at 3 years, and 77.4% at 5 years. Reintervention occurred in 6.63%, with considerable heterogeneity. Late complications included retrograde type A dissection (2.27%), aortic rupture (2.63%), and stent-induced new entry (3.10%). Aortic remodeling analysis revealed a mean thoracic diameter reduction of 4.29 mm and a false lumen thrombosis rate of 14.65%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Thoracic endovascular aortic repair in hrTBAD patients is associated with low early mortality and favorable long-term survival and aortic remodeling, especially when performed during the subacute phase. Despite encouraging results, current evidence is limited to non-randomized studies. Further prospective trials are needed to refine patient selection and determine long-term efficacy.Clinical ImpactThis meta-analysis reinforces that thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for high-risk uncomplicated type B aortic dissection (hrTBAD) is safe and potentially beneficial, demonstrating low early mortality and encouraging aortic remodeling outcomes. However, the procedure is not devoid of complications, such as stroke, spinal cord ischemia, stent-induced new entry (SINE), or retrograde dissection, which may be infrequent in conservatively managed patients. Until randomized evidence becomes available, TEVAR should be considered on a case-by-case basis, integrating anatomical risk profiles, institutional expertise, and individualized prognostic assessment within multidisciplinary decis
背景:单纯B型主动脉夹层(hrTBAD)患者的高危特征与不良主动脉事件和不良预后相关,仅采用最佳药物治疗(OMT)。然而,胸椎血管内主动脉修复(TEVAR)在这一特定亚组中的作用仍存在争议。虽然一些研究表明早期血管内介入可能改善长期主动脉重塑并减少晚期并发症,但其他研究强调潜在的程序风险和缺乏随机证据。为了解决这些不确定性,我们进行了系统回顾和单臂荟萃分析,以评估hrTBAD患者TEVAR的早期和长期结果。方法:我们检索MEDLINE、Embase和Cochrane图书馆,检索截至2025年1月报告TEVAR治疗hrTBAD结果的研究。符合条件的研究是观察性队列或试验,包括由血管外科学会标准定义的hrTBAD患者。数据采用随机效应模型合成。根据Kaplan-Meier曲线重建个体患者数据以估计总生存率。结果:纳入10项回顾性队列研究,涉及1971例患者。合并早期死亡率为1.22%(95%可信区间[CI], 0.14%-2.96%),卒中3.29%,脊髓缺血1.10%,早期Stanford A型夹层0.40%。晚期预后显示1年生存率为88.0%,3年生存率为84.0%,5年生存率为77.4%。再干预发生率为6.63%,存在较大的异质性。晚期并发症包括逆行性A型夹层(2.27%)、主动脉破裂(2.63%)和支架所致新入腔(3.10%)。主动脉重塑分析显示,平均胸径缩小4.29 mm,假腔血栓形成率为14.65%。结论:hrTBAD患者的胸部血管内主动脉修复与低早期死亡率、良好的长期生存率和主动脉重塑相关,特别是在亚急性期进行修复。尽管结果令人鼓舞,但目前的证据仅限于非随机研究。需要进一步的前瞻性试验来完善患者选择并确定长期疗效。临床影响:本荟萃分析强调,胸椎血管内主动脉修复术(TEVAR)治疗高风险无并发症B型主动脉夹层(hrTBAD)是安全且潜在有益的,显示出较低的早期死亡率和促进主动脉重塑的结果。然而,该手术并非没有并发症,如中风、脊髓缺血、支架诱导的新入路(SINE)或逆行夹层,这在保守治疗的患者中可能不常见。在获得随机证据之前,TEVAR应该在个案的基础上进行考虑,在多学科决策中整合解剖风险概况、机构专业知识和个性化预后评估。
{"title":"Endovascular Repair in High-Risk Uncomplicated Type B Aortic Dissection: A Systematic Review and Single-Arm Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Milton Sérgio Bohatch Júnior, Beatriz de Melo Silva, Elisabeth Amanda Gomes Soares, Nathalia de Carvalho Dias Miranda, Eduardo Corvello Teixeira, Luccas Marcolin Miranda, Tayrine Mazotti de Moraes, Amanda Fernandes Vidal da Silva, Fernando Reis Neto, Jose Maria Pereira de Godoy, Edwaldo Édner Joviliano","doi":"10.1177/15266028251408978","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15266028251408978","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Background: &lt;/strong&gt;High-risk features in patients with uncomplicated type B aortic dissection (hrTBAD) have been associated with adverse aortic events and poor prognosis when managed with optimal medical therapy (OMT) alone. However, the role of thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) in this specific subgroup remains controversial. While some studies suggest that early endovascular intervention may improve long-term aortic remodeling and reduce late complications, others emphasize the potential procedural risks and lack of randomized evidence. To address these uncertainties, we conducted a systematic review and single-arm meta-analysis to evaluate the early and long-term outcomes of TEVAR in patients with hrTBAD.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Methods: &lt;/strong&gt;We searched MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library through January 2025 for studies reporting outcomes of TEVAR in hrTBAD. Eligible studies were observational cohorts or trials including patients with hrTBAD, as defined by Society for Vascular Surgery criteria. Data were synthesized using random-effects models. Individual patient data were reconstructed from Kaplan-Meier curves to estimate pooled survival.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Results: &lt;/strong&gt;Ten retrospective cohort studies involving 1971 patients were included. Pooled early mortality was 1.22% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.14%-2.96%), stroke 3.29%, spinal cord ischemia 1.10%, and early Stanford type A dissection 0.40%. Late outcomes showed survival rates of 88.0% at 1 year, 84.0% at 3 years, and 77.4% at 5 years. Reintervention occurred in 6.63%, with considerable heterogeneity. Late complications included retrograde type A dissection (2.27%), aortic rupture (2.63%), and stent-induced new entry (3.10%). Aortic remodeling analysis revealed a mean thoracic diameter reduction of 4.29 mm and a false lumen thrombosis rate of 14.65%.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Conclusion: &lt;/strong&gt;Thoracic endovascular aortic repair in hrTBAD patients is associated with low early mortality and favorable long-term survival and aortic remodeling, especially when performed during the subacute phase. Despite encouraging results, current evidence is limited to non-randomized studies. Further prospective trials are needed to refine patient selection and determine long-term efficacy.Clinical ImpactThis meta-analysis reinforces that thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for high-risk uncomplicated type B aortic dissection (hrTBAD) is safe and potentially beneficial, demonstrating low early mortality and encouraging aortic remodeling outcomes. However, the procedure is not devoid of complications, such as stroke, spinal cord ischemia, stent-induced new entry (SINE), or retrograde dissection, which may be infrequent in conservatively managed patients. Until randomized evidence becomes available, TEVAR should be considered on a case-by-case basis, integrating anatomical risk profiles, institutional expertise, and individualized prognostic assessment within multidisciplinary decis","PeriodicalId":50210,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Endovascular Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"15266028251408978"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2026-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146041914","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Transperineal approach technique for the treatment of slow-flow perirectal vascular malformations. 经会阴入路技术治疗慢流直肠周围血管畸形。
IF 1.5 2区 医学 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE Pub Date : 2026-01-22 DOI: 10.1177/15266028251406646
Mayra Citlalli Velarde-Castillo, Javier E Anaya-Ayala, Jose Andres Najera-Martinez, Salomon Cohen-Mussali, Dayri Alejandra Cruz-Melendrez, Julia Moscardini-Martelli, Alejandro Celis-Jimenez

Background: Perirectal vascular malformations are uncommon and difficult lesions due to their deep location and proximity to vital pelvic structures. Traditional treatments include endoscopic, percutaneous, or surgical methods, each with potential risks. We aim to describe a novel, minimally invasive transperineal approach technique for treating perirectal venous and lymphatic malformations using combined polidocanol and bleomycin sclerotherapy.

Methods: Three patients with perirectal vascular malformations were treated using a transrectal digital-guided (finger) approach under fluoroscopic control. After lesion mapping with ionic or non-ionic contrast, sclerotherapy was performed using polidocanol-based foam combined with bleomycin.

Results: All procedures were technically successful. The approach allowed accurate localization, safe puncture, and effective sclerosis of the lesions while reducing procedural trauma. Postoperative pain was mild and self-limited. No cases of systemic toxicity, deep venous thrombosis, or tissue necrosis were observed during follow-up.

Conclusion: The transperineal approach provides a safe and effective alternative for treating perirectal vascular malformations, offering excellent anatomic control and reduced morbidity. Combined polidocanol-bleomycin sclerotherapy appears to be a feasible and well-tolerated therapeutic option; however, larger studies are needed to confirm its efficacy and long-term outcomes.Clinical ImpactThe transperineal approach for the management of slow-flow vascular malformations represents a practical, safe, and reproducible therapeutic option that provides minimally invasive access to complex perirectal lesions. By eliminating the need for endoscopic instruments or major surgical procedures, it reduces both procedural risks and associated costs. Its technical simplicity and minimal equipment requirements facilitate its implementation in most vascular centers, broadening access to specialized care across various clinical settings.

背景:直肠周围血管畸形是一种罕见且困难的病变,因为其位置较深且靠近重要的骨盆结构。传统的治疗方法包括内窥镜、经皮或手术方法,每种方法都有潜在的风险。我们的目的是描述一种新的,微创经会阴入路技术治疗直肠周围静脉和淋巴畸形使用联合多卡因醇和博来霉素硬化疗法。方法:对3例直肠周围血管畸形患者在透视控制下采用经直肠指指入路治疗。在用离子或非离子造影剂进行病变定位后,使用聚多醇基泡沫联合博来霉素进行硬化治疗。结果:所有手术在技术上均成功。该入路可以准确定位,安全穿刺,有效硬化病变,同时减少手术创伤。术后疼痛轻微,自限性强。随访期间未见全身性毒性、深静脉血栓形成或组织坏死病例。结论:经会阴入路是一种安全有效的治疗直肠周围血管畸形的方法,具有良好的解剖控制和较低的发病率。多元醇-博来霉素联合硬化治疗似乎是一种可行且耐受性良好的治疗选择;然而,需要更大规模的研究来证实其疗效和长期结果。临床影响经会阴入路治疗慢血流血管畸形是一种实用、安全、可重复的治疗选择,为复杂的直肠周围病变提供了微创治疗。通过消除对内窥镜器械或主要外科手术的需要,它降低了手术风险和相关成本。其技术的简单性和最小的设备要求促进了其在大多数血管中心的实施,扩大了在各种临床环境中获得专业护理的机会。
{"title":"Transperineal approach technique for the treatment of slow-flow perirectal vascular malformations.","authors":"Mayra Citlalli Velarde-Castillo, Javier E Anaya-Ayala, Jose Andres Najera-Martinez, Salomon Cohen-Mussali, Dayri Alejandra Cruz-Melendrez, Julia Moscardini-Martelli, Alejandro Celis-Jimenez","doi":"10.1177/15266028251406646","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15266028251406646","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Perirectal vascular malformations are uncommon and difficult lesions due to their deep location and proximity to vital pelvic structures. Traditional treatments include endoscopic, percutaneous, or surgical methods, each with potential risks. We aim to describe a novel, minimally invasive transperineal approach technique for treating perirectal venous and lymphatic malformations using combined polidocanol and bleomycin sclerotherapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Three patients with perirectal vascular malformations were treated using a transrectal digital-guided (finger) approach under fluoroscopic control. After lesion mapping with ionic or non-ionic contrast, sclerotherapy was performed using polidocanol-based foam combined with bleomycin.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All procedures were technically successful. The approach allowed accurate localization, safe puncture, and effective sclerosis of the lesions while reducing procedural trauma. Postoperative pain was mild and self-limited. No cases of systemic toxicity, deep venous thrombosis, or tissue necrosis were observed during follow-up.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The transperineal approach provides a safe and effective alternative for treating perirectal vascular malformations, offering excellent anatomic control and reduced morbidity. Combined polidocanol-bleomycin sclerotherapy appears to be a feasible and well-tolerated therapeutic option; however, larger studies are needed to confirm its efficacy and long-term outcomes.Clinical ImpactThe transperineal approach for the management of slow-flow vascular malformations represents a practical, safe, and reproducible therapeutic option that provides minimally invasive access to complex perirectal lesions. By eliminating the need for endoscopic instruments or major surgical procedures, it reduces both procedural risks and associated costs. Its technical simplicity and minimal equipment requirements facilitate its implementation in most vascular centers, broadening access to specialized care across various clinical settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":50210,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Endovascular Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"15266028251406646"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2026-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146031497","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
National Survey on Radiation Safety Practices and Exposure Among Vascular Surgery Trainees and Consultants in Spain. 西班牙血管外科受训人员和顾问的辐射安全实践和暴露全国调查。
IF 1.5 2区 医学 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE Pub Date : 2026-01-20 DOI: 10.1177/15266028251408031
Dorelly-Tanayra Martínez Del Carmen, Pablo Saldaña Gutiérrez, Carlos Martínez Rico, Albert Castellà Durall, Emilio Ramos Rubio, Elena Iborra Ortega

Objective: This study aimed to assess the current status of radiation safety training, practices, and exposure awareness among vascular surgery trainees and consultants across Spain.

Methods: This was a national cross-sectional survey. An anonymous online questionnaire was distributed to all members of the Spanish Society of Angiology and Vascular Surgery. The survey collected data on professional status (trainee or consultant), years of training or practice, formal radiation protection education, feedback on exposure levels, use of personal protective equipment, and adherence to As Low As Reasonably Achievable (ALARA) principles. All responses were recorded electronically and analyzed using descriptive statistics.

Results: Ninety participants completed the survey, including 21 trainees (23.3%) and 69 consultants (76.7%). Among them, 94.1% of trainees and 75% of consultants reported receiving formal radiation safety training during residency. However, only 15.8% of trainees and 44.9% of consultants had completed an updated radiation protection course. Regarding routine feedback on occupational exposure, 38.1% of trainees and 72.5% of consultants reported receiving regular updates. Advanced protective measures were underused. None of the trainees and 4.4% of consultant members reported exceeding the annual dose limit of 20 mSv.

Conclusion: Our findings provide relevant information on radiation safety practices among vascular surgery professionals in Spain. A significant proportion of both trainees and consultants lack regular exposure feedback and have limited interaction with radiation safety personnel. In addition, many have not received recent refresher training. These results support the need for structured education, consistent exposure monitoring, and reinforcement of safety protocols across all levels of surgical training.Clinical ImpactThis nationwide survey provides a national overview of radiation safety training, monitoring, and protective practices among vascular surgery trainees and consultants in Spain. It shows that, despite widespread use of basic protective equipment, relevant gaps persist in refresher education, exposure feedback, and the implementation of advanced ALARA strategies. For clinicians, these findings underscore the need to move beyond individual protective measures toward structured, institutionally supported radiation safety practices. This study represents the first national evidence in Spain to support standardized training programs, institutional radiation safety protocols, and policies to reduce long-term occupational radiation exposure.

目的:本研究旨在评估西班牙血管外科受训人员和顾问的辐射安全培训、实践和暴露意识的现状。方法:这是一个全国性的横断面调查。一份匿名的在线调查问卷被分发给了西班牙血管学和血管外科学会的所有成员。调查收集了以下方面的数据:专业状况(受训人员或顾问)、培训或实践年数、正式的辐射防护教育、照射水平反馈、个人防护设备的使用情况以及遵守“尽可能低”原则(ALARA)。所有的回答都以电子方式记录下来,并使用描述性统计进行分析。结果:共90人完成调查,其中学员21人(23.3%),咨询师69人(76.7%)。其中,94.1%的受训人员和75%的顾问在住院期间接受过正规的辐射安全培训。然而,只有15.8%的受训人员和44.9%的顾问完成了最新的辐射防护课程。关于职业暴露的常规反馈,38.1%的受训者和72.5%的咨询师报告定期收到反馈。先进的保护措施没有得到充分利用。没有学员和4.4%的顾问成员报告超过20毫西沃特的年剂量上限。结论:我们的研究结果为西班牙血管外科专业人员的辐射安全实践提供了相关信息。很大一部分受训人员和顾问缺乏定期的照射反馈,与辐射安全人员的互动有限。此外,许多人最近没有接受过进修培训。这些结果支持在各级外科培训中进行结构化教育、一致的暴露监测和加强安全规程的必要性。临床影响这项全国性的调查提供了西班牙血管外科受训人员和顾问的辐射安全培训、监测和防护实践的全国概况。它表明,尽管广泛使用了基本防护装备,但在更新教育、暴露反馈和执行先进的ALARA战略方面仍然存在相关差距。对于临床医生来说,这些发现强调了从个人防护措施转向结构化、制度性支持的辐射安全实践的必要性。这项研究是西班牙第一个支持标准化培训计划、机构辐射安全协议和减少长期职业辐射暴露政策的国家证据。
{"title":"National Survey on Radiation Safety Practices and Exposure Among Vascular Surgery Trainees and Consultants in Spain.","authors":"Dorelly-Tanayra Martínez Del Carmen, Pablo Saldaña Gutiérrez, Carlos Martínez Rico, Albert Castellà Durall, Emilio Ramos Rubio, Elena Iborra Ortega","doi":"10.1177/15266028251408031","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15266028251408031","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to assess the current status of radiation safety training, practices, and exposure awareness among vascular surgery trainees and consultants across Spain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a national cross-sectional survey. An anonymous online questionnaire was distributed to all members of the Spanish Society of Angiology and Vascular Surgery. The survey collected data on professional status (trainee or consultant), years of training or practice, formal radiation protection education, feedback on exposure levels, use of personal protective equipment, and adherence to As Low As Reasonably Achievable (ALARA) principles. All responses were recorded electronically and analyzed using descriptive statistics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ninety participants completed the survey, including 21 trainees (23.3%) and 69 consultants (76.7%). Among them, 94.1% of trainees and 75% of consultants reported receiving formal radiation safety training during residency. However, only 15.8% of trainees and 44.9% of consultants had completed an updated radiation protection course. Regarding routine feedback on occupational exposure, 38.1% of trainees and 72.5% of consultants reported receiving regular updates. Advanced protective measures were underused. None of the trainees and 4.4% of consultant members reported exceeding the annual dose limit of 20 mSv.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings provide relevant information on radiation safety practices among vascular surgery professionals in Spain. A significant proportion of both trainees and consultants lack regular exposure feedback and have limited interaction with radiation safety personnel. In addition, many have not received recent refresher training. These results support the need for structured education, consistent exposure monitoring, and reinforcement of safety protocols across all levels of surgical training.Clinical ImpactThis nationwide survey provides a national overview of radiation safety training, monitoring, and protective practices among vascular surgery trainees and consultants in Spain. It shows that, despite widespread use of basic protective equipment, relevant gaps persist in refresher education, exposure feedback, and the implementation of advanced ALARA strategies. For clinicians, these findings underscore the need to move beyond individual protective measures toward structured, institutionally supported radiation safety practices. This study represents the first national evidence in Spain to support standardized training programs, institutional radiation safety protocols, and policies to reduce long-term occupational radiation exposure.</p>","PeriodicalId":50210,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Endovascular Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"15266028251408031"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2026-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146013258","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Journal of Endovascular Therapy
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1