Pub Date : 2026-02-01Epub Date: 2024-05-31DOI: 10.1177/15266028241257106
Maysam Shehab, Anders Wanhainen, Gustaf Tegler, David Lindstrom, William Yoon, Kevin Mani
Introduction: Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) in chronic dissection is associated with a risk for distal stent-graft-induced new entry (dSINE) in up to a quarter of cases. We assess the mid-term outcome of a novel dissection-specific stent-graft (DSSG), which is a custom-made device based on the Cook Alpha platform, with a modified graft design and a distal endovascular elephant trunk without any supporting stent to reduce the radial force on the dissection membrane at the distal landing zone.
Methods: A retrospective single-center study of chronic dissection patients at high risk of dSINE who received an elective endovascular repair with DSSG from January 2017 to June 2023. The primary outcome is Kaplan-Meier (KM) estimated freedom from dSINE during follow-up. Secondary outcomes included technical success, aortic remodeling, and anatomical evaluation of the distal landing zone in cases with dSINE during follow-up versus those without.
Results: Thirty patients (24 males) with a median age of 66 years [range=31-78] underwent elective TEVAR with the DSSG. The majority, n=27 (90%), had previous aortic repair; 7 (23%) had established connective tissue disease, and 6 (20%) had established dSINE after previous stent-graft implantation as an indication for TEVAR. Technical success was achieved in n=29 (97%). Median follow-up was 38.5 months (4.3-76.4), and KM estimated freedom from dSINE at 1 and 3 years was 95.6% (SE 0.043) and 89% (SE 0.081), respectively Four cases developed dSINE during follow-up. The median distance from the distal stent-graft to the coeliac trunk was 74mm (range=18-123) in the dSINE group versus 26mm (range=0-74) in the non-dSINE group (p=0.049). Median proximal tangential aortic angulation in the distal landing zone was 38.5° (range=26°-50°) in the dSINE group compared to 21° (range=3-61°) in the non-dSINE group (p=0.052).
Conclusions: The Use of a novel DSSG with low radial force for TEVAR in the setting of chronic dissection is safe and feasible, with remodeling outcomes comparable with standard TEVAR. The reduced distal radial force in the DSSG does not eliminate the risk for dSINE over time, with new entries occurring, particularly in cases where the distal landing zone is in a tortuous aortic segment and not close to the coeliac trunk.Clinical ImpactUsing the novel dissection-specific stent-graft with reduced radial force is safe and feasible but does not completely eliminate the risk of dSINE occurring over time. The exact positioning of the distal stent-graft in a straight aortic segment, close to the coeliac trunk, may be of importance to further mitigate the risk.
{"title":"Six Years' Experience With a Novel Dissection-Specific Stent-Graft to Prevent Distal Stent-Graft-Induced New Entry.","authors":"Maysam Shehab, Anders Wanhainen, Gustaf Tegler, David Lindstrom, William Yoon, Kevin Mani","doi":"10.1177/15266028241257106","DOIUrl":"10.1177/15266028241257106","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) in chronic dissection is associated with a risk for distal stent-graft-induced new entry (dSINE) in up to a quarter of cases. We assess the mid-term outcome of a novel dissection-specific stent-graft (DSSG), which is a custom-made device based on the Cook Alpha platform, with a modified graft design and a distal endovascular elephant trunk without any supporting stent to reduce the radial force on the dissection membrane at the distal landing zone.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective single-center study of chronic dissection patients at high risk of dSINE who received an elective endovascular repair with DSSG from January 2017 to June 2023. The primary outcome is Kaplan-Meier (KM) estimated freedom from dSINE during follow-up. Secondary outcomes included technical success, aortic remodeling, and anatomical evaluation of the distal landing zone in cases with dSINE during follow-up versus those without.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty patients (24 males) with a median age of 66 years [range=31-78] underwent elective TEVAR with the DSSG. The majority, n=27 (90%), had previous aortic repair; 7 (23%) had established connective tissue disease, and 6 (20%) had established dSINE after previous stent-graft implantation as an indication for TEVAR. Technical success was achieved in n=29 (97%). Median follow-up was 38.5 months (4.3-76.4), and KM estimated freedom from dSINE at 1 and 3 years was 95.6% (SE 0.043) and 89% (SE 0.081), respectively Four cases developed dSINE during follow-up. The median distance from the distal stent-graft to the coeliac trunk was 74mm (range=18-123) in the dSINE group versus 26mm (range=0-74) in the non-dSINE group (p=0.049). Median proximal tangential aortic angulation in the distal landing zone was 38.5° (range=26°-50°) in the dSINE group compared to 21° (range=3-61°) in the non-dSINE group (p=0.052).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The Use of a novel DSSG with low radial force for TEVAR in the setting of chronic dissection is safe and feasible, with remodeling outcomes comparable with standard TEVAR. The reduced distal radial force in the DSSG does not eliminate the risk for dSINE over time, with new entries occurring, particularly in cases where the distal landing zone is in a tortuous aortic segment and not close to the coeliac trunk.Clinical ImpactUsing the novel dissection-specific stent-graft with reduced radial force is safe and feasible but does not completely eliminate the risk of dSINE occurring over time. The exact positioning of the distal stent-graft in a straight aortic segment, close to the coeliac trunk, may be of importance to further mitigate the risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":50210,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Endovascular Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"397-405"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12804415/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141181389","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-30DOI: 10.1177/15266028261418847
Miguel Godeiro Fernandez, Grace Carvajal Mulatti, Lucas Portela Tavares, Walter Campos, José Siqueira de Araújo Filho, Nelson De Luccia, André Brito-Queiroz
Purpose: To describe a standardized technique for managing "wire wrap" during the implantation of fenestrated endografts in the aortic arch. This approach aims to enhance wire position predictability, reduce unnecessary device manipulations, and improve procedural safety in fenestrated thoracic endovascular aortic repair (f-TEVAR).
Technique: The technique is illustrated through 3 representative cases, including a customized triple-wide scallop endograft with a single fenestration featuring a preloaded guidewire, as well as 2 additional physician-modified endograft cases. The procedure begins with detailed preoperative imaging to plan graft selection and positioning. A through-and-through wire system is employed, with careful advancement of the delivery system into the descending thoracic aorta. We distinguish 3 possible scenarios in right anterior oblique fluoroscopy regarding wire position: guidewire aligned, graft positioned posterior to the wire, or graft positioned anterior to the wire. Specific rotational maneuvers-clockwise or counterclockwise-are performed in the descending thoracic aorta to resolve wire wrapping. Once corrected, the fenestration aligns precisely with the targeted supra-aortic branch for graft deployment.
Conclusion: The systematic approach to addressing "wire wrap" during f-TEVAR minimizes embolization and device distortion risks while optimizing procedural efficiency. This reproducible technique provides a valuable tool for advancing endovascular repair in challenging aortic arch pathologies.Clinical ImpactThis standardized technique for managing "wire wrap" during fenestrated thoracic endovascular aortic repair provides a reproducible and practical approach to a well-recognized intraoperative challenge. By systematizing wire handling, the technique enhances procedural safety and minimizes unplanned maneuvers that may increase operative time and radiation exposure while also facilitating device alignment and deployment in demanding scenarios. The innovation lies in offering a simple, easily adoptable strategy that can be consistently applied across operators and centers, supporting safer dissemination of complex endovascular techniques and promoting more predictable outcomes in advanced aortic repair.
{"title":"Right Anterior Oblique-Based Approach for Managing Wire Wrap During Fenestrated TEVAR.","authors":"Miguel Godeiro Fernandez, Grace Carvajal Mulatti, Lucas Portela Tavares, Walter Campos, José Siqueira de Araújo Filho, Nelson De Luccia, André Brito-Queiroz","doi":"10.1177/15266028261418847","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15266028261418847","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To describe a standardized technique for managing \"wire wrap\" during the implantation of fenestrated endografts in the aortic arch. This approach aims to enhance wire position predictability, reduce unnecessary device manipulations, and improve procedural safety in fenestrated thoracic endovascular aortic repair (f-TEVAR).</p><p><strong>Technique: </strong>The technique is illustrated through 3 representative cases, including a customized triple-wide scallop endograft with a single fenestration featuring a preloaded guidewire, as well as 2 additional physician-modified endograft cases. The procedure begins with detailed preoperative imaging to plan graft selection and positioning. A through-and-through wire system is employed, with careful advancement of the delivery system into the descending thoracic aorta. We distinguish 3 possible scenarios in right anterior oblique fluoroscopy regarding wire position: guidewire aligned, graft positioned posterior to the wire, or graft positioned anterior to the wire. Specific rotational maneuvers-clockwise or counterclockwise-are performed in the descending thoracic aorta to resolve wire wrapping. Once corrected, the fenestration aligns precisely with the targeted supra-aortic branch for graft deployment.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The systematic approach to addressing \"wire wrap\" during f-TEVAR minimizes embolization and device distortion risks while optimizing procedural efficiency. This reproducible technique provides a valuable tool for advancing endovascular repair in challenging aortic arch pathologies.Clinical ImpactThis standardized technique for managing \"wire wrap\" during fenestrated thoracic endovascular aortic repair provides a reproducible and practical approach to a well-recognized intraoperative challenge. By systematizing wire handling, the technique enhances procedural safety and minimizes unplanned maneuvers that may increase operative time and radiation exposure while also facilitating device alignment and deployment in demanding scenarios. The innovation lies in offering a simple, easily adoptable strategy that can be consistently applied across operators and centers, supporting safer dissemination of complex endovascular techniques and promoting more predictable outcomes in advanced aortic repair.</p>","PeriodicalId":50210,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Endovascular Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"15266028261418847"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2026-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146094656","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Persistent sciatic artery (PSA) is a rare congenital vascular abnormality associated with the embryonic development of the iliac, common femoral, and superficial femoral arteries. Most cases of PSA are incidentally detected and are generally asymptomatic. However, PSA can present as chronic pain, such as neuralgia from aneurysmal dilatation compressing the sciatic nerve, or ischemic pain due to thrombus embolization from the aneurysm. In severe cases, aneurysm rupture poses a significant threat to both limb and life. Timely detection and appropriate intervention are therefore crucial. This article explores the clinical characteristics and treatment strategies of PSA, exemplified through the management of a patient with PSA complicated by distal embolization.Clinical ImpactThis study underscores the importance of simultaneously addressing both the aneurysm and distal thromboembolism in symptomatic persistent sciatic artery (PSA) cases, rather than treating embolic events alone. It reinforces endovascular repair as a preferred, minimally invasive strategy, reducing surgical trauma and nerve injury risk. For clinicians, this highlights the need for vigilant follow-up and consideration of early combined intervention to prevent recurrence. The innovation lies in demonstrating the efficacy of a staged, hybrid endovascular approach and proposing postural modification as a potential adjunct to slow aneurysm progression, offering a refined management paradigm for this rare condition.
{"title":"Endovascular Treatment of a Persistent Sciatic Artery Aneurysm Complicated by Lower Extremity Arterial Embolism.","authors":"Wenfei Guan, Peng Jiang, Yongpan Cui, Zihan Zhang, Jian He, Kewei Wang, Jianfeng Sun, Fei Mei","doi":"10.1177/15266028261417148","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15266028261417148","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Persistent sciatic artery (PSA) is a rare congenital vascular abnormality associated with the embryonic development of the iliac, common femoral, and superficial femoral arteries. Most cases of PSA are incidentally detected and are generally asymptomatic. However, PSA can present as chronic pain, such as neuralgia from aneurysmal dilatation compressing the sciatic nerve, or ischemic pain due to thrombus embolization from the aneurysm. In severe cases, aneurysm rupture poses a significant threat to both limb and life. Timely detection and appropriate intervention are therefore crucial. This article explores the clinical characteristics and treatment strategies of PSA, exemplified through the management of a patient with PSA complicated by distal embolization.Clinical ImpactThis study underscores the importance of simultaneously addressing both the aneurysm and distal thromboembolism in symptomatic persistent sciatic artery (PSA) cases, rather than treating embolic events alone. It reinforces endovascular repair as a preferred, minimally invasive strategy, reducing surgical trauma and nerve injury risk. For clinicians, this highlights the need for vigilant follow-up and consideration of early combined intervention to prevent recurrence. The innovation lies in demonstrating the efficacy of a staged, hybrid endovascular approach and proposing postural modification as a potential adjunct to slow aneurysm progression, offering a refined management paradigm for this rare condition.</p>","PeriodicalId":50210,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Endovascular Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"15266028261417148"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2026-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146094696","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-26DOI: 10.1177/15266028251401192
Nicola Leone, Luigi Alberto Maria Bartolotti, Francesco Andreoli, Mattia Migliari, Andrea Ferri, Pietro Paolo Nicoletti, Roberto Silingardi, Stefano Gennai
Introduction: Endovascular repair of the aortic arch has emerged as an alternative to open surgery, particularly for high-risk and elderly patients. While multibranched endografts have demonstrated technical success, anatomical suitability remains a key limiting factor, especially given the variability of arch anatomy. The aim of the present study is to evaluate the suitability of the Hector multibranch device in a cohort of patients who underwent endovascular treatment for aortic arch's lesions.
Methods: A total of 539 patients were treated between 1999 and 2024, with 79 included in a single-center, retrospective, preclinical study. The suitability for device and its connecting stent was defined according to the manufacturer's instructions for use. Extended suitability was also evaluated, including patients excluded for limiting anatomical criteria. Secondary outcomes were suitable and non-suitable patients' comparison, exclusion causes analysis, and anatomical characteristics associated with suitability. A logistic regression model assessed associations between baseline and non-suitability.
Results: A total of 50 patients (63.2%) were suitable for implantation, raising to 54 (68.4%) by using other available bridging stents. Approximately half of the eligible patients could have been treated using 14 configurations for the analyzed device. The left common carotid artery bridging stent was appropriate for all suitable patients, while the appropriateness rate for the left subclavian artery stent was 92.6%. The odds of non-feasibility increased with proximal landing zone shortening (OR=1.05, p=0.015), whereas each additional millimeter in BCT length increased the odds of suitability by 6% (OR=1.06, p=0.046).
Conclusions: The Hector Stent Graft system coupled with commercially available bridging stents for supra-aortic trunks proved to be feasible for more than two-thirds of patients previously subjected to an endovascular treatment for aortic arch pathologies. The left common carotid artery bridging stent was suitable for all patients, while the one for the left subclavian artery was adequate for 9 out of 10 cases.Clinical ImpactThe Hector™ Stent Graft system shows high anatomical feasibility for endovascular aortic arch repair, with broad applicability using limited configurations. Its design may help minimize supra-aortic-trunks manipulation and facilitate safer, more streamlined procedures to treat the aortic arch pathologies in a complete endovascular fashion.
{"title":"Anatomical Viability of the \"Hector Multibranched Thoracic Stent-Graft System\" and Connecting Stent for Endovascular Aortic Arch Repair.","authors":"Nicola Leone, Luigi Alberto Maria Bartolotti, Francesco Andreoli, Mattia Migliari, Andrea Ferri, Pietro Paolo Nicoletti, Roberto Silingardi, Stefano Gennai","doi":"10.1177/15266028251401192","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15266028251401192","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Endovascular repair of the aortic arch has emerged as an alternative to open surgery, particularly for high-risk and elderly patients. While multibranched endografts have demonstrated technical success, anatomical suitability remains a key limiting factor, especially given the variability of arch anatomy. The aim of the present study is to evaluate the suitability of the Hector multibranch device in a cohort of patients who underwent endovascular treatment for aortic arch's lesions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 539 patients were treated between 1999 and 2024, with 79 included in a single-center, retrospective, preclinical study. The suitability for device and its connecting stent was defined according to the manufacturer's instructions for use. Extended suitability was also evaluated, including patients excluded for limiting anatomical criteria. Secondary outcomes were suitable and non-suitable patients' comparison, exclusion causes analysis, and anatomical characteristics associated with suitability. A logistic regression model assessed associations between baseline and non-suitability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 50 patients (63.2%) were suitable for implantation, raising to 54 (68.4%) by using other available bridging stents. Approximately half of the eligible patients could have been treated using 14 configurations for the analyzed device. The left common carotid artery bridging stent was appropriate for all suitable patients, while the appropriateness rate for the left subclavian artery stent was 92.6%. The odds of non-feasibility increased with proximal landing zone shortening (OR=1.05, p=0.015), whereas each additional millimeter in BCT length increased the odds of suitability by 6% (OR=1.06, p=0.046).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The Hector Stent Graft system coupled with commercially available bridging stents for supra-aortic trunks proved to be feasible for more than two-thirds of patients previously subjected to an endovascular treatment for aortic arch pathologies. The left common carotid artery bridging stent was suitable for all patients, while the one for the left subclavian artery was adequate for 9 out of 10 cases.Clinical ImpactThe Hector™ Stent Graft system shows high anatomical feasibility for endovascular aortic arch repair, with broad applicability using limited configurations. Its design may help minimize supra-aortic-trunks manipulation and facilitate safer, more streamlined procedures to treat the aortic arch pathologies in a complete endovascular fashion.</p>","PeriodicalId":50210,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Endovascular Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"15266028251401192"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2026-01-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146053875","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-25DOI: 10.1177/15266028251407974
Sinem Nur Sever, Hale Oktem, Yusuf Jamil, Can Pelin
Background: Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) has become a standard treatment for abdominal aortic aneurysms. However, the evolution of EVAR research and its global landscape remain underexplored. This bibliometric analysis aims to map publication trends, identify key contributors, and analyze thematic shifts in EVAR literature over the past three decades.
Methods: Data were collected from the Web of Science Core Collection (SCIE) in May 2025. A total of 4264 original research articles on EVAR were analyzed using VOSviewer for co-authorship, co-citation, and keyword co-occurrence mapping. Citation trends, geographical distribution, and institutional contributions were also assessed.
Results: Research on EVAR showed steady growth, with a peak of 295 publications in 2024. The United States contributed the largest share (33.02%) of publications. Prolific authors such as Schermerhorn and Verhagen, affiliated with leading institutions like Harvard University, played a pivotal role in advancing the field. Keyword analysis revealed a shift from technical terms (e.g., "stent graft") to clinical outcomes (e.g., "reintervention") over time. The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) in EVAR research is emerging as a key focus area.
Conclusion: This study highlights the growth and evolving focus of EVAR research, with a notable shift toward patient-centered outcomes. Despite strong contributions from high-income countries, there is a significant gap in research from low-resource settings. Future directions should include addressing gaps in radiation safety, emergency EVAR applications, and exploring AI-driven clinical decision-making for personalized treatments. Complex EVAR research continues expanding, reflecting guideline evolution and advancing practice in anatomically challenging cases.Clinical ImpactThis bibliometric analysis demonstrates how EVAR has progressed from an emerging minimally invasive technique to a guideline driven standard of care, with a growing emphasis on complex fenestrated and branched procedures. For clinicians, the findings clarify where the evidence base is well established, particularly for standard infrarenal EVAR, and where further caution and innovation are required, including complex anatomies, long term durability, and reintervention risk. By synthesizing influential studies, key guideline milestones, and evolving research themes, this study supports evidence based clinical decision making, improves patient counseling, and reinforces the importance of lifelong surveillance. Its innovation lies in translating three decades of global research into clinically actionable insight.
背景:血管内动脉瘤修复术(EVAR)已成为腹主动脉瘤的标准治疗方法。然而,EVAR研究的演变及其全球格局仍未得到充分探索。这个文献计量分析的目的是绘制出版趋势,确定关键贡献者,并分析在过去三十年EVAR文献的主题变化。方法:数据收集于2025年5月的SCIE (Web of Science Core Collection)。利用VOSviewer对共4264篇EVAR原创研究文章进行合著、共被引和关键词共现映射分析。还评估了引文趋势、地理分布和机构贡献。结果:EVAR研究稳步增长,2024年达到峰值295篇。美国贡献了最大的份额(33.02%)。Schermerhorn和Verhagen等多产的作者,隶属于哈佛大学等领先机构,在推动这一领域的发展方面发挥了关键作用。关键词分析显示,随着时间的推移,从技术术语(如“支架移植”)到临床结果(如“再干预”)的转变。人工智能(AI)在EVAR研究中的集成正成为一个重点研究领域。结论:本研究突出了EVAR研究的发展和发展重点,并显著转向以患者为中心的结果。尽管来自高收入国家的贡献很大,但来自低资源环境的研究存在很大差距。未来的方向应包括解决辐射安全、紧急EVAR应用方面的差距,以及探索人工智能驱动的个性化治疗临床决策。复杂的EVAR研究不断扩大,反映了指南的演变和在解剖学上具有挑战性的病例中推进实践。临床影响本文献计量学分析展示了EVAR是如何从一种新兴的微创技术发展成为指导驱动的护理标准的,并越来越强调复杂的开窗和分支手术。对于临床医生来说,研究结果明确了证据基础的建立,特别是对于标准的肾下EVAR,以及需要进一步谨慎和创新的地方,包括复杂的解剖结构、长期耐久性和再干预风险。通过综合有影响力的研究、关键的指导里程碑和不断发展的研究主题,本研究支持基于证据的临床决策,改善患者咨询,并加强终身监测的重要性。其创新之处在于将三十年的全球研究成果转化为临床可行的见解。
{"title":"Trends and Scientific Evolution in Endovascular Aneurysm Repair (EVAR) Research: A Comprehensive Bibliometric Study Using VOSviewer.","authors":"Sinem Nur Sever, Hale Oktem, Yusuf Jamil, Can Pelin","doi":"10.1177/15266028251407974","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15266028251407974","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) has become a standard treatment for abdominal aortic aneurysms. However, the evolution of EVAR research and its global landscape remain underexplored. This bibliometric analysis aims to map publication trends, identify key contributors, and analyze thematic shifts in EVAR literature over the past three decades.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were collected from the Web of Science Core Collection (SCIE) in May 2025. A total of 4264 original research articles on EVAR were analyzed using VOSviewer for co-authorship, co-citation, and keyword co-occurrence mapping. Citation trends, geographical distribution, and institutional contributions were also assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Research on EVAR showed steady growth, with a peak of 295 publications in 2024. The United States contributed the largest share (33.02%) of publications. Prolific authors such as Schermerhorn and Verhagen, affiliated with leading institutions like Harvard University, played a pivotal role in advancing the field. Keyword analysis revealed a shift from technical terms (e.g., \"stent graft\") to clinical outcomes (e.g., \"reintervention\") over time. The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) in EVAR research is emerging as a key focus area.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study highlights the growth and evolving focus of EVAR research, with a notable shift toward patient-centered outcomes. Despite strong contributions from high-income countries, there is a significant gap in research from low-resource settings. Future directions should include addressing gaps in radiation safety, emergency EVAR applications, and exploring AI-driven clinical decision-making for personalized treatments. Complex EVAR research continues expanding, reflecting guideline evolution and advancing practice in anatomically challenging cases.Clinical ImpactThis bibliometric analysis demonstrates how EVAR has progressed from an emerging minimally invasive technique to a guideline driven standard of care, with a growing emphasis on complex fenestrated and branched procedures. For clinicians, the findings clarify where the evidence base is well established, particularly for standard infrarenal EVAR, and where further caution and innovation are required, including complex anatomies, long term durability, and reintervention risk. By synthesizing influential studies, key guideline milestones, and evolving research themes, this study supports evidence based clinical decision making, improves patient counseling, and reinforces the importance of lifelong surveillance. Its innovation lies in translating three decades of global research into clinically actionable insight.</p>","PeriodicalId":50210,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Endovascular Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"15266028251407974"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2026-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146047362","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: Fibrosing mediastinitis is a rare critical disease that encases and compresses mediastinal structures. It is classified as either primary (idiopathic) or secondary based on the underlying etiology. Idiopathic fibrosing mediastinitis presents significant diagnostic challenges, particularly when patients presented with nonspecific symptoms, which may result in misdiagnosis.
Case report: A 53-year-old male patient with bilateral pulmonary artery stenosis due to idiopathic fibrosing mediastinitis was successfully treated with balloon angioplasty and bilateral stent implantation. Subsequent follow-up visits over 3 years demonstrated sustained improvement in the patient's symptoms. Imaging studies confirmed the complete patency of the implanted stents, with no evidence of vascular defects or in-stent restenosis.
Conclusion: Achieving an accurate diagnosis is critical in these cases; furthermore, transcatheter stent implantation is an effective intervention for managing vascular stenosis associated with fibrosing mediastinitis.Clinical ImpactThe rarity of idiopathic fibrosing mediastinitis and the lack of evidence-based treatment strategies make the diagnosis and management challenging. This case emphasizes the importance of endovascular intervention and underscores its role as a viable treatment option for managing similar cases of pulmonary artery stenosis due to fibrosing mediastinitis.
{"title":"Transcatheter Stent Placement for Bilateral Pulmonary Artery Stenosis Due to Idiopathic Fibrosing Mediastinitis.","authors":"Ashraf Haidarah, Hussam Alsawidi, Chen Mao, Yuan Feng","doi":"10.1177/15266028251410798","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15266028251410798","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Fibrosing mediastinitis is a rare critical disease that encases and compresses mediastinal structures. It is classified as either primary (idiopathic) or secondary based on the underlying etiology. Idiopathic fibrosing mediastinitis presents significant diagnostic challenges, particularly when patients presented with nonspecific symptoms, which may result in misdiagnosis.</p><p><strong>Case report: </strong>A 53-year-old male patient with bilateral pulmonary artery stenosis due to idiopathic fibrosing mediastinitis was successfully treated with balloon angioplasty and bilateral stent implantation. Subsequent follow-up visits over 3 years demonstrated sustained improvement in the patient's symptoms. Imaging studies confirmed the complete patency of the implanted stents, with no evidence of vascular defects or in-stent restenosis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Achieving an accurate diagnosis is critical in these cases; furthermore, transcatheter stent implantation is an effective intervention for managing vascular stenosis associated with fibrosing mediastinitis.Clinical ImpactThe rarity of idiopathic fibrosing mediastinitis and the lack of evidence-based treatment strategies make the diagnosis and management challenging. This case emphasizes the importance of endovascular intervention and underscores its role as a viable treatment option for managing similar cases of pulmonary artery stenosis due to fibrosing mediastinitis.</p>","PeriodicalId":50210,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Endovascular Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"15266028251410798"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2026-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146047288","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-25DOI: 10.1177/15266028261420457
{"title":"Thanks to Reviewers.","authors":"","doi":"10.1177/15266028261420457","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15266028261420457","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":50210,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Endovascular Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"15266028261420457"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2026-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146047359","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-24DOI: 10.1177/15266028251408978
Milton Sérgio Bohatch Júnior, Beatriz de Melo Silva, Elisabeth Amanda Gomes Soares, Nathalia de Carvalho Dias Miranda, Eduardo Corvello Teixeira, Luccas Marcolin Miranda, Tayrine Mazotti de Moraes, Amanda Fernandes Vidal da Silva, Fernando Reis Neto, Jose Maria Pereira de Godoy, Edwaldo Édner Joviliano
<p><strong>Background: </strong>High-risk features in patients with uncomplicated type B aortic dissection (hrTBAD) have been associated with adverse aortic events and poor prognosis when managed with optimal medical therapy (OMT) alone. However, the role of thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) in this specific subgroup remains controversial. While some studies suggest that early endovascular intervention may improve long-term aortic remodeling and reduce late complications, others emphasize the potential procedural risks and lack of randomized evidence. To address these uncertainties, we conducted a systematic review and single-arm meta-analysis to evaluate the early and long-term outcomes of TEVAR in patients with hrTBAD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library through January 2025 for studies reporting outcomes of TEVAR in hrTBAD. Eligible studies were observational cohorts or trials including patients with hrTBAD, as defined by Society for Vascular Surgery criteria. Data were synthesized using random-effects models. Individual patient data were reconstructed from Kaplan-Meier curves to estimate pooled survival.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ten retrospective cohort studies involving 1971 patients were included. Pooled early mortality was 1.22% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.14%-2.96%), stroke 3.29%, spinal cord ischemia 1.10%, and early Stanford type A dissection 0.40%. Late outcomes showed survival rates of 88.0% at 1 year, 84.0% at 3 years, and 77.4% at 5 years. Reintervention occurred in 6.63%, with considerable heterogeneity. Late complications included retrograde type A dissection (2.27%), aortic rupture (2.63%), and stent-induced new entry (3.10%). Aortic remodeling analysis revealed a mean thoracic diameter reduction of 4.29 mm and a false lumen thrombosis rate of 14.65%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Thoracic endovascular aortic repair in hrTBAD patients is associated with low early mortality and favorable long-term survival and aortic remodeling, especially when performed during the subacute phase. Despite encouraging results, current evidence is limited to non-randomized studies. Further prospective trials are needed to refine patient selection and determine long-term efficacy.Clinical ImpactThis meta-analysis reinforces that thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for high-risk uncomplicated type B aortic dissection (hrTBAD) is safe and potentially beneficial, demonstrating low early mortality and encouraging aortic remodeling outcomes. However, the procedure is not devoid of complications, such as stroke, spinal cord ischemia, stent-induced new entry (SINE), or retrograde dissection, which may be infrequent in conservatively managed patients. Until randomized evidence becomes available, TEVAR should be considered on a case-by-case basis, integrating anatomical risk profiles, institutional expertise, and individualized prognostic assessment within multidisciplinary decis
{"title":"Endovascular Repair in High-Risk Uncomplicated Type B Aortic Dissection: A Systematic Review and Single-Arm Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Milton Sérgio Bohatch Júnior, Beatriz de Melo Silva, Elisabeth Amanda Gomes Soares, Nathalia de Carvalho Dias Miranda, Eduardo Corvello Teixeira, Luccas Marcolin Miranda, Tayrine Mazotti de Moraes, Amanda Fernandes Vidal da Silva, Fernando Reis Neto, Jose Maria Pereira de Godoy, Edwaldo Édner Joviliano","doi":"10.1177/15266028251408978","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15266028251408978","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>High-risk features in patients with uncomplicated type B aortic dissection (hrTBAD) have been associated with adverse aortic events and poor prognosis when managed with optimal medical therapy (OMT) alone. However, the role of thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) in this specific subgroup remains controversial. While some studies suggest that early endovascular intervention may improve long-term aortic remodeling and reduce late complications, others emphasize the potential procedural risks and lack of randomized evidence. To address these uncertainties, we conducted a systematic review and single-arm meta-analysis to evaluate the early and long-term outcomes of TEVAR in patients with hrTBAD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library through January 2025 for studies reporting outcomes of TEVAR in hrTBAD. Eligible studies were observational cohorts or trials including patients with hrTBAD, as defined by Society for Vascular Surgery criteria. Data were synthesized using random-effects models. Individual patient data were reconstructed from Kaplan-Meier curves to estimate pooled survival.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ten retrospective cohort studies involving 1971 patients were included. Pooled early mortality was 1.22% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.14%-2.96%), stroke 3.29%, spinal cord ischemia 1.10%, and early Stanford type A dissection 0.40%. Late outcomes showed survival rates of 88.0% at 1 year, 84.0% at 3 years, and 77.4% at 5 years. Reintervention occurred in 6.63%, with considerable heterogeneity. Late complications included retrograde type A dissection (2.27%), aortic rupture (2.63%), and stent-induced new entry (3.10%). Aortic remodeling analysis revealed a mean thoracic diameter reduction of 4.29 mm and a false lumen thrombosis rate of 14.65%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Thoracic endovascular aortic repair in hrTBAD patients is associated with low early mortality and favorable long-term survival and aortic remodeling, especially when performed during the subacute phase. Despite encouraging results, current evidence is limited to non-randomized studies. Further prospective trials are needed to refine patient selection and determine long-term efficacy.Clinical ImpactThis meta-analysis reinforces that thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for high-risk uncomplicated type B aortic dissection (hrTBAD) is safe and potentially beneficial, demonstrating low early mortality and encouraging aortic remodeling outcomes. However, the procedure is not devoid of complications, such as stroke, spinal cord ischemia, stent-induced new entry (SINE), or retrograde dissection, which may be infrequent in conservatively managed patients. Until randomized evidence becomes available, TEVAR should be considered on a case-by-case basis, integrating anatomical risk profiles, institutional expertise, and individualized prognostic assessment within multidisciplinary decis","PeriodicalId":50210,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Endovascular Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"15266028251408978"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2026-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146041914","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-22DOI: 10.1177/15266028251406646
Mayra Citlalli Velarde-Castillo, Javier E Anaya-Ayala, Jose Andres Najera-Martinez, Salomon Cohen-Mussali, Dayri Alejandra Cruz-Melendrez, Julia Moscardini-Martelli, Alejandro Celis-Jimenez
Background: Perirectal vascular malformations are uncommon and difficult lesions due to their deep location and proximity to vital pelvic structures. Traditional treatments include endoscopic, percutaneous, or surgical methods, each with potential risks. We aim to describe a novel, minimally invasive transperineal approach technique for treating perirectal venous and lymphatic malformations using combined polidocanol and bleomycin sclerotherapy.
Methods: Three patients with perirectal vascular malformations were treated using a transrectal digital-guided (finger) approach under fluoroscopic control. After lesion mapping with ionic or non-ionic contrast, sclerotherapy was performed using polidocanol-based foam combined with bleomycin.
Results: All procedures were technically successful. The approach allowed accurate localization, safe puncture, and effective sclerosis of the lesions while reducing procedural trauma. Postoperative pain was mild and self-limited. No cases of systemic toxicity, deep venous thrombosis, or tissue necrosis were observed during follow-up.
Conclusion: The transperineal approach provides a safe and effective alternative for treating perirectal vascular malformations, offering excellent anatomic control and reduced morbidity. Combined polidocanol-bleomycin sclerotherapy appears to be a feasible and well-tolerated therapeutic option; however, larger studies are needed to confirm its efficacy and long-term outcomes.Clinical ImpactThe transperineal approach for the management of slow-flow vascular malformations represents a practical, safe, and reproducible therapeutic option that provides minimally invasive access to complex perirectal lesions. By eliminating the need for endoscopic instruments or major surgical procedures, it reduces both procedural risks and associated costs. Its technical simplicity and minimal equipment requirements facilitate its implementation in most vascular centers, broadening access to specialized care across various clinical settings.
{"title":"Transperineal approach technique for the treatment of slow-flow perirectal vascular malformations.","authors":"Mayra Citlalli Velarde-Castillo, Javier E Anaya-Ayala, Jose Andres Najera-Martinez, Salomon Cohen-Mussali, Dayri Alejandra Cruz-Melendrez, Julia Moscardini-Martelli, Alejandro Celis-Jimenez","doi":"10.1177/15266028251406646","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15266028251406646","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Perirectal vascular malformations are uncommon and difficult lesions due to their deep location and proximity to vital pelvic structures. Traditional treatments include endoscopic, percutaneous, or surgical methods, each with potential risks. We aim to describe a novel, minimally invasive transperineal approach technique for treating perirectal venous and lymphatic malformations using combined polidocanol and bleomycin sclerotherapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Three patients with perirectal vascular malformations were treated using a transrectal digital-guided (finger) approach under fluoroscopic control. After lesion mapping with ionic or non-ionic contrast, sclerotherapy was performed using polidocanol-based foam combined with bleomycin.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All procedures were technically successful. The approach allowed accurate localization, safe puncture, and effective sclerosis of the lesions while reducing procedural trauma. Postoperative pain was mild and self-limited. No cases of systemic toxicity, deep venous thrombosis, or tissue necrosis were observed during follow-up.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The transperineal approach provides a safe and effective alternative for treating perirectal vascular malformations, offering excellent anatomic control and reduced morbidity. Combined polidocanol-bleomycin sclerotherapy appears to be a feasible and well-tolerated therapeutic option; however, larger studies are needed to confirm its efficacy and long-term outcomes.Clinical ImpactThe transperineal approach for the management of slow-flow vascular malformations represents a practical, safe, and reproducible therapeutic option that provides minimally invasive access to complex perirectal lesions. By eliminating the need for endoscopic instruments or major surgical procedures, it reduces both procedural risks and associated costs. Its technical simplicity and minimal equipment requirements facilitate its implementation in most vascular centers, broadening access to specialized care across various clinical settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":50210,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Endovascular Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"15266028251406646"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2026-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146031497","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-20DOI: 10.1177/15266028251408031
Dorelly-Tanayra Martínez Del Carmen, Pablo Saldaña Gutiérrez, Carlos Martínez Rico, Albert Castellà Durall, Emilio Ramos Rubio, Elena Iborra Ortega
Objective: This study aimed to assess the current status of radiation safety training, practices, and exposure awareness among vascular surgery trainees and consultants across Spain.
Methods: This was a national cross-sectional survey. An anonymous online questionnaire was distributed to all members of the Spanish Society of Angiology and Vascular Surgery. The survey collected data on professional status (trainee or consultant), years of training or practice, formal radiation protection education, feedback on exposure levels, use of personal protective equipment, and adherence to As Low As Reasonably Achievable (ALARA) principles. All responses were recorded electronically and analyzed using descriptive statistics.
Results: Ninety participants completed the survey, including 21 trainees (23.3%) and 69 consultants (76.7%). Among them, 94.1% of trainees and 75% of consultants reported receiving formal radiation safety training during residency. However, only 15.8% of trainees and 44.9% of consultants had completed an updated radiation protection course. Regarding routine feedback on occupational exposure, 38.1% of trainees and 72.5% of consultants reported receiving regular updates. Advanced protective measures were underused. None of the trainees and 4.4% of consultant members reported exceeding the annual dose limit of 20 mSv.
Conclusion: Our findings provide relevant information on radiation safety practices among vascular surgery professionals in Spain. A significant proportion of both trainees and consultants lack regular exposure feedback and have limited interaction with radiation safety personnel. In addition, many have not received recent refresher training. These results support the need for structured education, consistent exposure monitoring, and reinforcement of safety protocols across all levels of surgical training.Clinical ImpactThis nationwide survey provides a national overview of radiation safety training, monitoring, and protective practices among vascular surgery trainees and consultants in Spain. It shows that, despite widespread use of basic protective equipment, relevant gaps persist in refresher education, exposure feedback, and the implementation of advanced ALARA strategies. For clinicians, these findings underscore the need to move beyond individual protective measures toward structured, institutionally supported radiation safety practices. This study represents the first national evidence in Spain to support standardized training programs, institutional radiation safety protocols, and policies to reduce long-term occupational radiation exposure.
{"title":"National Survey on Radiation Safety Practices and Exposure Among Vascular Surgery Trainees and Consultants in Spain.","authors":"Dorelly-Tanayra Martínez Del Carmen, Pablo Saldaña Gutiérrez, Carlos Martínez Rico, Albert Castellà Durall, Emilio Ramos Rubio, Elena Iborra Ortega","doi":"10.1177/15266028251408031","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15266028251408031","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to assess the current status of radiation safety training, practices, and exposure awareness among vascular surgery trainees and consultants across Spain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a national cross-sectional survey. An anonymous online questionnaire was distributed to all members of the Spanish Society of Angiology and Vascular Surgery. The survey collected data on professional status (trainee or consultant), years of training or practice, formal radiation protection education, feedback on exposure levels, use of personal protective equipment, and adherence to As Low As Reasonably Achievable (ALARA) principles. All responses were recorded electronically and analyzed using descriptive statistics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ninety participants completed the survey, including 21 trainees (23.3%) and 69 consultants (76.7%). Among them, 94.1% of trainees and 75% of consultants reported receiving formal radiation safety training during residency. However, only 15.8% of trainees and 44.9% of consultants had completed an updated radiation protection course. Regarding routine feedback on occupational exposure, 38.1% of trainees and 72.5% of consultants reported receiving regular updates. Advanced protective measures were underused. None of the trainees and 4.4% of consultant members reported exceeding the annual dose limit of 20 mSv.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings provide relevant information on radiation safety practices among vascular surgery professionals in Spain. A significant proportion of both trainees and consultants lack regular exposure feedback and have limited interaction with radiation safety personnel. In addition, many have not received recent refresher training. These results support the need for structured education, consistent exposure monitoring, and reinforcement of safety protocols across all levels of surgical training.Clinical ImpactThis nationwide survey provides a national overview of radiation safety training, monitoring, and protective practices among vascular surgery trainees and consultants in Spain. It shows that, despite widespread use of basic protective equipment, relevant gaps persist in refresher education, exposure feedback, and the implementation of advanced ALARA strategies. For clinicians, these findings underscore the need to move beyond individual protective measures toward structured, institutionally supported radiation safety practices. This study represents the first national evidence in Spain to support standardized training programs, institutional radiation safety protocols, and policies to reduce long-term occupational radiation exposure.</p>","PeriodicalId":50210,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Endovascular Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"15266028251408031"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2026-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146013258","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}