首页 > 最新文献

Annals of Surgery Open最新文献

英文 中文
To Dissect or Not to Dissect? The Surgeon’s Perspective on the Prediction of Greater Than or Equal to 4 Axillary Lymph Node Metastasis in Early-Stage Breast Cancer: A Comparative Analysis of the Per-Protocol Population of the SINODAR-ONE Clinical Trial 解剖还是不解剖?外科医生对早期乳腺癌腋窝淋巴结转移大于或等于 4 个的预测观点:SINODAR-ONE临床试验按方案人群的比较分析
Pub Date : 2024-03-01 DOI: 10.1097/as9.0000000000000405
C. Tinterri, Giuseppe Canavese, D. Gentile
{"title":"To Dissect or Not to Dissect? The Surgeon’s Perspective on the Prediction of Greater Than or Equal to 4 Axillary Lymph Node Metastasis in Early-Stage Breast Cancer: A Comparative Analysis of the Per-Protocol Population of the SINODAR-ONE Clinical Trial","authors":"C. Tinterri, Giuseppe Canavese, D. Gentile","doi":"10.1097/as9.0000000000000405","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/as9.0000000000000405","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":503165,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Surgery Open","volume":"26 24","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140269050","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Comment on “Total Pancreatectomy With Islet Autotransplantation as an Alternative to High-Risk Pancreatojejunostomy After Pancreaticoduodenectomy: A Prospective Randomized Trial” 关于 "胰十二指肠切除术后胰岛自体移植替代高风险胰空肠吻合术:一项前瞻性随机试验"
Pub Date : 2024-03-01 DOI: 10.1097/as9.0000000000000393
Leo Buhler, Ty Dunn, U. Boggi, C. Vollmer, Jens Werner, Christos Dervenis, Giovanni Marchegiani, Shailesh V Shrikhande, I. Khatkov, Abraham Fingerhut
{"title":"Comment on “Total Pancreatectomy With Islet Autotransplantation as an Alternative to High-Risk Pancreatojejunostomy After Pancreaticoduodenectomy: A Prospective Randomized Trial”","authors":"Leo Buhler, Ty Dunn, U. Boggi, C. Vollmer, Jens Werner, Christos Dervenis, Giovanni Marchegiani, Shailesh V Shrikhande, I. Khatkov, Abraham Fingerhut","doi":"10.1097/as9.0000000000000393","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/as9.0000000000000393","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":503165,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Surgery Open","volume":"7 25","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140084121","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
How Reliable Is Endoscopic Scoring of Postoperative Recurrence in Crohn Disease?: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis 克罗恩病术后复发的内镜评分有多可靠?系统回顾与元分析
Pub Date : 2024-03-01 DOI: 10.1097/as9.0000000000000397
E. M. L. van der Does de Willebois, Vittoria Bellato, M. Duijvestein, Susan van Dieren, S. Danese, Pierpaolo Sileri, C. Buskens, Andrea Vignali, Willem Bemelman
Guidelines advise to perform endoscopic surveillance following ileocolic resection (ICR) in Crohn disease (CD) for timely diagnosis of recurrence. This study aims to assess the variation in endoscopic recurrence (ER) rates in patients after ICR for CD using the most commonly used classification systems, the Rutgeerts score (RS) and modified Rutgeerts score (mRS) classifications. A systematic literature search using MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library was performed. Randomized controlled trials and cohort studies describing ER < 12 months after an ICR for CD were included. Animal studies, reviews, case reports (<30 included patients), pediatric studies, and letters were excluded. The Newcastle–Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale and Cochrane Collaboration’s tool were used to assess risk of bias. Main outcome was the range of ER rates within 12 months postoperatively, defined as RS ≥ i2 and/or mRS ≥ i2b. A proportional meta-analysis was performed. The final search was performed on January 4, 2022. The study was registered at PROSPERO, CRD42022363208. Seventy-six studies comprising 7751 patients were included. The weighted mean of ER rates in all included studies was 44.0% (95% confidence interval, 43.56–44.43). The overall range was 5.0% to 93.0% [interquartile range (IQR), 29.2–59.0]. The weighted means for RS and mRS were 44.0% and 41.1%, respectively. The variation in ER rates for RS and mRS were 5.0% to 93.0% (IQR, 29.0–59.5) and 19.8% to 62.9% (IQR, 37.3–46.5), respectively. Within studies reporting both RS and mRS, the weighted means for ER were 61.3% and 40.6%, respectively. This study demonstrates a major variation in ER rates after ICR for CD, suggesting a high likelihood of inadequate diagnosis of disease recurrence, with potentially impact on quality of life and health care consumption. Therefore, there is an important need to improve endoscopic scoring of recurrent disease.
指南建议在克罗恩病(CD)的回结肠切除术(ICR)后进行内镜监测,以便及时诊断复发。本研究旨在使用最常用的分类系统,即鲁格尔茨评分(RS)和改良鲁格尔茨评分(mRS)分类,评估克罗恩病(CD)ICR术后患者内镜复发(ER)率的变化。 我们使用 MEDLINE、Embase 和 Cochrane 图书馆进行了系统的文献检索。纳入的文献包括随机对照试验和队列研究,这些研究描述了 CD ICR 后 12 个月内的 ER 情况。动物研究、综述、病例报告(纳入患者<30例)、儿科研究和信件均被排除在外。采用纽卡斯尔-渥太华质量评估量表和 Cochrane 协作工具评估偏倚风险。主要结果是术后12个月内的ER率范围,定义为RS≥i2和/或mRS≥i2b。进行了比例荟萃分析。最终检索于2022年1月4日完成。该研究已在 PROSPERO 注册,编号为 CRD42022363208。 共纳入 76 项研究,包括 7751 名患者。所有纳入研究的急诊室率加权平均值为 44.0%(95% 置信区间,43.56-44.43)。总体范围为 5.0% 至 93.0% [四分位数间距 (IQR),29.2-59.0]。RS和mRS的加权平均值分别为44.0%和41.1%。RS和mRS的ER率差异分别为5.0%至93.0%(IQR,29.0-59.5)和19.8%至62.9%(IQR,37.3-46.5)。在同时报告 RS 和 mRS 的研究中,ER 的加权平均值分别为 61.3% 和 40.6%。 这项研究表明,CD 患者在接受 ICR 治疗后的 ER 率存在很大差异,这表明疾病复发诊断不充分的可能性很高,可能会对生活质量和医疗消耗产生影响。因此,亟需改进对复发疾病的内镜评分。
{"title":"How Reliable Is Endoscopic Scoring of Postoperative Recurrence in Crohn Disease?: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis","authors":"E. M. L. van der Does de Willebois, Vittoria Bellato, M. Duijvestein, Susan van Dieren, S. Danese, Pierpaolo Sileri, C. Buskens, Andrea Vignali, Willem Bemelman","doi":"10.1097/as9.0000000000000397","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/as9.0000000000000397","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 \u0000 Guidelines advise to perform endoscopic surveillance following ileocolic resection (ICR) in Crohn disease (CD) for timely diagnosis of recurrence. This study aims to assess the variation in endoscopic recurrence (ER) rates in patients after ICR for CD using the most commonly used classification systems, the Rutgeerts score (RS) and modified Rutgeerts score (mRS) classifications.\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 \u0000 A systematic literature search using MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library was performed. Randomized controlled trials and cohort studies describing ER < 12 months after an ICR for CD were included. Animal studies, reviews, case reports (<30 included patients), pediatric studies, and letters were excluded. The Newcastle–Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale and Cochrane Collaboration’s tool were used to assess risk of bias. Main outcome was the range of ER rates within 12 months postoperatively, defined as RS ≥ i2 and/or mRS ≥ i2b. A proportional meta-analysis was performed. The final search was performed on January 4, 2022. The study was registered at PROSPERO, CRD42022363208.\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 \u0000 Seventy-six studies comprising 7751 patients were included. The weighted mean of ER rates in all included studies was 44.0% (95% confidence interval, 43.56–44.43). The overall range was 5.0% to 93.0% [interquartile range (IQR), 29.2–59.0]. The weighted means for RS and mRS were 44.0% and 41.1%, respectively. The variation in ER rates for RS and mRS were 5.0% to 93.0% (IQR, 29.0–59.5) and 19.8% to 62.9% (IQR, 37.3–46.5), respectively. Within studies reporting both RS and mRS, the weighted means for ER were 61.3% and 40.6%, respectively.\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 \u0000 This study demonstrates a major variation in ER rates after ICR for CD, suggesting a high likelihood of inadequate diagnosis of disease recurrence, with potentially impact on quality of life and health care consumption. Therefore, there is an important need to improve endoscopic scoring of recurrent disease.\u0000","PeriodicalId":503165,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Surgery Open","volume":"512 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140274897","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Is Everyone Beating Around the Bush?: A Qualitative Study Examining the Status of Shared Decision-Making Between Veterans Affairs Providers and Surgical Patients in the ICU 每个人都在喋喋不休吗?一项定性研究,探讨退伍军人事务提供者与重症监护室手术患者之间共同决策的现状
Pub Date : 2024-03-01 DOI: 10.1097/as9.0000000000000403
M. A. Millis, C. Vitous, Cara Ferguson, Maedeh A. Marzoughi, Erin Kim, Sarah E. Bradley, A. Duby, P. Suwanabol
We sought to determine if and how providers use elements of shared decision-making (SDM) in the care of surgical patients in the intensive care unit (ICU). SDM is the gold standard for decision-making in the ICU. However, it is unknown if this communication style is used in caring for critically ill surgical patients. Qualitative interviews were conducted with providers who provide ICU-level care to surgical patients in Veterans Affairs hospitals. Interviews were designed to examine end-of-life care among veterans who have undergone surgery and require ICU-level care. Forty-eight providers across 14 Veterans Affairs hospitals were interviewed. These participants were diverse with respect to age, race, and sex. Participant dialogue was deductively mapped into 8 established SDM components: describing treatment options; determining roles in the decision-making process; fostering partnerships; health care professional preferences; learning about the patient; patient preferences; supporting the decision-making process; and tailoring the information. Within these components, participants shared preferred tools and tactics used to satisfy a given SDM component. Participants also noted numerous barriers to achieving SDM among surgical patients. Providers use elements of SDM when caring for critically ill surgical patients. Additionally, this work identifies facilitators that can be leveraged and barriers that can be addressed to facilitate better communication and decision-making through SDM. These findings are of value for future interventions that seek to enhance SDM among surgical patients both in the ICU and in other settings.
我们试图确定在重症监护病房(ICU)护理手术患者时,医疗服务提供者是否以及如何使用共同决策(SDM)要素。 SDM 是重症监护室决策的黄金标准。然而,这种沟通方式是否用于重症外科病人的护理还不得而知。 我们对退伍军人事务医院中为外科手术患者提供 ICU 级护理的医护人员进行了定性访谈。访谈旨在研究接受过手术并需要 ICU 级护理的退伍军人的临终关怀。 14 家退伍军人事务医院的 48 名医护人员接受了访谈。这些参与者的年龄、种族和性别各不相同。参与者的对话被演绎为 8 个既定的 SDM 要素:描述治疗方案;确定决策过程中的角色;促进合作;医护人员的偏好;了解患者;患者的偏好;支持决策过程;以及定制信息。在这些组成部分中,与会者分享了用于满足特定 SDM 组成部分的首选工具和策略。与会者还指出了手术患者实现 SDM 的诸多障碍。 医护人员在护理重症手术患者时会使用 SDM 要素。此外,这项工作还确定了可以利用的促进因素和可以解决的障碍,以通过 SDM 促进更好的沟通和决策。这些发现对于未来在重症监护室和其他环境中寻求加强外科手术患者 SDM 的干预措施很有价值。
{"title":"Is Everyone Beating Around the Bush?: A Qualitative Study Examining the Status of Shared Decision-Making Between Veterans Affairs Providers and Surgical Patients in the ICU","authors":"M. A. Millis, C. Vitous, Cara Ferguson, Maedeh A. Marzoughi, Erin Kim, Sarah E. Bradley, A. Duby, P. Suwanabol","doi":"10.1097/as9.0000000000000403","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/as9.0000000000000403","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 \u0000 We sought to determine if and how providers use elements of shared decision-making (SDM) in the care of surgical patients in the intensive care unit (ICU).\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 \u0000 SDM is the gold standard for decision-making in the ICU. However, it is unknown if this communication style is used in caring for critically ill surgical patients.\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 \u0000 Qualitative interviews were conducted with providers who provide ICU-level care to surgical patients in Veterans Affairs hospitals. Interviews were designed to examine end-of-life care among veterans who have undergone surgery and require ICU-level care.\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 \u0000 Forty-eight providers across 14 Veterans Affairs hospitals were interviewed. These participants were diverse with respect to age, race, and sex. Participant dialogue was deductively mapped into 8 established SDM components: describing treatment options; determining roles in the decision-making process; fostering partnerships; health care professional preferences; learning about the patient; patient preferences; supporting the decision-making process; and tailoring the information. Within these components, participants shared preferred tools and tactics used to satisfy a given SDM component. Participants also noted numerous barriers to achieving SDM among surgical patients.\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 \u0000 Providers use elements of SDM when caring for critically ill surgical patients. Additionally, this work identifies facilitators that can be leveraged and barriers that can be addressed to facilitate better communication and decision-making through SDM. These findings are of value for future interventions that seek to enhance SDM among surgical patients both in the ICU and in other settings.\u0000","PeriodicalId":503165,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Surgery Open","volume":"29 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140269260","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Cost Analysis for Robotic and Open Gastrectomy 机器人和开腹胃切除术的成本分析
Pub Date : 2024-03-01 DOI: 10.1097/as9.0000000000000396
Y. Hirata, Heather Lyu, Ahad M. Azimuddin, Pamela Lu, Jeeva Ajith, Jason A. Schmeisser, Elizabeth P. Ninan, Kyung Hyun Lee, B. Badgwell, Paul F. Mansfield, N. Ikoma
To determine the magnitude of the perioperative costs associated with robotic gastrectomy (RG). A robotic surgery platform has a high implementation cost and requires maintenance costs; however, whether the overall cost of RG, including all perioperative costs, is higher than conventional open gastrectomy (OG) remains unknown. Patients who underwent a major gastrectomy during February 2018 through December 2021 were retrospectively identified. We calculated the perioperative costs of RG and OG and compared them overall as well as in different phases, including intraoperative costs and 30-day postsurgery inpatient and outpatient costs. We investigated factors potentially associated with high cost and estimated the likelihood of RG to reduce overall cost under a Bayesian framework. All cost data were converted to ratios to the average cost of all operations performed at our center in year FY2021. We identified 119 patients who underwent gastrectomy. The incidence of postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo >IIIa; RG, 10% vs OG, 13%) did not significantly differ between approaches. The median length of stay was 3 days shorter for RG versus OG (4 vs 7 days, P < 0.001). Intraoperative cost ratios were significantly higher for RG (RG, 2.6 vs OG, 1.7; P < 0.001). However, postoperative hospitalization cost ratios were significantly lower for RG (RG, 2.8 vs OG, 3.9; P < 0.001). Total perioperative cost ratios were similar between groups (RG, 6.1 vs OG, 6.4; P = 0.534). The multiple Bayesian generalized linear analysis showed RG had 76.5% posterior probability of overall perioperative cost reduction (adjusted risk ratio of 0.95; 95% credible interval, 0.85–1.07). Despite increased intraoperative costs, total perioperative costs in the RG group were similar to those in the OG group because of reduced postoperative hospitalization costs.
确定与机器人胃切除术(RG)相关的围手术期成本的规模。 机器人手术平台的实施成本很高,并且需要维护成本;然而,机器人胃切除术的总体成本(包括所有围手术期成本)是否高于传统的开腹胃切除术(OG)仍是未知数。 我们对 2018 年 2 月至 2021 年 12 月期间接受胃大部切除术的患者进行了回顾性鉴定。我们计算了RG和OG的围手术期成本,并对两者的总体成本以及不同阶段的成本进行了比较,包括术中成本和术后30天的住院和门诊成本。我们研究了可能与高成本相关的因素,并在贝叶斯框架下估计了 RG 降低总体成本的可能性。我们将所有成本数据转换为 2021 财年本中心所有手术平均成本的比率。 我们确定了 119 名接受胃切除术的患者。不同方法的术后并发症发生率(Clavien-Dindo >IIIa;RG,10% vs OG,13%)无显著差异。RG 与 OG 相比,中位住院时间缩短了 3 天(4 天 vs 7 天,P < 0.001)。RG 的术中成本比明显更高(RG 2.6 vs OG 1.7;P < 0.001)。但是,RG 的术后住院费用比明显较低(RG,2.8 vs OG,3.9;P <0.001)。两组的围手术期总成本比相似(RG,6.1 vs OG,6.4;P = 0.534)。多重贝叶斯广义线性分析显示,RG 有 76.5% 的后验概率使围手术期总成本降低(调整风险比为 0.95;95% 可信区间为 0.85-1.07)。 尽管术中费用增加,但由于术后住院费用减少,RG 组的围手术期总费用与 OG 组相似。
{"title":"Cost Analysis for Robotic and Open Gastrectomy","authors":"Y. Hirata, Heather Lyu, Ahad M. Azimuddin, Pamela Lu, Jeeva Ajith, Jason A. Schmeisser, Elizabeth P. Ninan, Kyung Hyun Lee, B. Badgwell, Paul F. Mansfield, N. Ikoma","doi":"10.1097/as9.0000000000000396","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/as9.0000000000000396","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 \u0000 To determine the magnitude of the perioperative costs associated with robotic gastrectomy (RG).\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 \u0000 A robotic surgery platform has a high implementation cost and requires maintenance costs; however, whether the overall cost of RG, including all perioperative costs, is higher than conventional open gastrectomy (OG) remains unknown.\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 \u0000 Patients who underwent a major gastrectomy during February 2018 through December 2021 were retrospectively identified. We calculated the perioperative costs of RG and OG and compared them overall as well as in different phases, including intraoperative costs and 30-day postsurgery inpatient and outpatient costs. We investigated factors potentially associated with high cost and estimated the likelihood of RG to reduce overall cost under a Bayesian framework. All cost data were converted to ratios to the average cost of all operations performed at our center in year FY2021.\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 \u0000 We identified 119 patients who underwent gastrectomy. The incidence of postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo >IIIa; RG, 10% vs OG, 13%) did not significantly differ between approaches. The median length of stay was 3 days shorter for RG versus OG (4 vs 7 days, P < 0.001). Intraoperative cost ratios were significantly higher for RG (RG, 2.6 vs OG, 1.7; P < 0.001). However, postoperative hospitalization cost ratios were significantly lower for RG (RG, 2.8 vs OG, 3.9; P < 0.001). Total perioperative cost ratios were similar between groups (RG, 6.1 vs OG, 6.4; P = 0.534). The multiple Bayesian generalized linear analysis showed RG had 76.5% posterior probability of overall perioperative cost reduction (adjusted risk ratio of 0.95; 95% credible interval, 0.85–1.07).\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 \u0000 Despite increased intraoperative costs, total perioperative costs in the RG group were similar to those in the OG group because of reduced postoperative hospitalization costs.\u0000","PeriodicalId":503165,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Surgery Open","volume":"155 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140275932","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Left Gastric Vein Direct Anastomosis as Alternative to Portal Flow Reconstruction in Liver Transplantation 肝脏移植中左胃静脉直接吻合术替代门静脉血流重建术
Pub Date : 2024-02-27 DOI: 10.1097/as9.0000000000000382
Raquel Lima Sampaio, G. R. Coelho, D. Mesquita, Carlos Eduardo Lopes Soares, José Huygens Parente Garcia
The most relevant limiting factor for performing end-to-end anastomosis is portal vein thrombosis (PVT), which leads to challenging vascular reconstructions. This study aimed to analyze a single center’s experience using the left gastric vein (LGV) for portal flow reconstruction in liver transplantation (LT). This retrospective observational study reviewed laboratory and imaging tests, a description of the surgical technique, and outpatient follow-up of patients with portal system thrombosis undergoing LT with portal flow reconstruction using the LGV. This study was conducted at a single transplant reference center in the northeast region of Brazil from January 2016 to December 2021. Between January 2016 and December 2021, 848 transplants were performed at our center. Eighty-two patients (9.7%) presented with PVT, most of whom were treated with thrombectomy. Nine patients (1.1% with PVT) had extensive thrombosis of the portal system (Yerdel III or IV), which required end-to-side anastomosis between the portal vein and the LGV without graft, and had no intraoperative complications. All patients had successful portal flow in Doppler ultrasound control evaluations. The goal was to reestablish physiological flow to the graft. A surgical strategy includes using the LGV graft. According to our reports, using LGV fulfilled the requirements for excellent vascular anastomosis and even allowed the dispensing of venous grafts. This is the largest case series in a single center of reconstruction of portal flow with direct anastomosis with the LGV without needing a vascular graft.
门静脉血栓(PVT)是进行端到端吻合术的最大限制因素,导致血管重建面临挑战。本研究旨在分析一个中心在肝移植(LT)中使用胃左静脉(LGV)进行门静脉血流重建的经验。 这项回顾性观察研究回顾了门静脉系统血栓患者接受肝移植门静脉血流重建术的实验室和影像学检查、手术技术描述和门诊随访情况。这项研究于2016年1月至2021年12月在巴西东北部地区的一家移植参考中心进行。 2016 年 1 月至 2021 年 12 月期间,我们中心共进行了 848 例移植手术。82名患者(9.7%)出现了PVT,其中大部分患者接受了血栓切除术治疗。9名患者(占PVT患者的1.1%)门静脉系统广泛血栓形成(Yerdel III或IV),需要在门静脉和LGV之间进行端对端吻合,且无需移植物,术中无并发症。在多普勒超声控制评估中,所有患者的门静脉血流都很通畅。 手术的目的是重建移植物的生理血流。手术策略包括使用 LGV 移植。根据我们的报告,使用 LGV 满足了良好血管吻合的要求,甚至可以不用静脉移植物。这是单个中心使用 LGV 直接吻合重建门静脉血流而无需血管移植的最大系列病例。
{"title":"Left Gastric Vein Direct Anastomosis as Alternative to Portal Flow Reconstruction in Liver Transplantation","authors":"Raquel Lima Sampaio, G. R. Coelho, D. Mesquita, Carlos Eduardo Lopes Soares, José Huygens Parente Garcia","doi":"10.1097/as9.0000000000000382","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/as9.0000000000000382","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 \u0000 The most relevant limiting factor for performing end-to-end anastomosis is portal vein thrombosis (PVT), which leads to challenging vascular reconstructions. This study aimed to analyze a single center’s experience using the left gastric vein (LGV) for portal flow reconstruction in liver transplantation (LT).\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 \u0000 This retrospective observational study reviewed laboratory and imaging tests, a description of the surgical technique, and outpatient follow-up of patients with portal system thrombosis undergoing LT with portal flow reconstruction using the LGV. This study was conducted at a single transplant reference center in the northeast region of Brazil from January 2016 to December 2021.\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 \u0000 Between January 2016 and December 2021, 848 transplants were performed at our center. Eighty-two patients (9.7%) presented with PVT, most of whom were treated with thrombectomy. Nine patients (1.1% with PVT) had extensive thrombosis of the portal system (Yerdel III or IV), which required end-to-side anastomosis between the portal vein and the LGV without graft, and had no intraoperative complications. All patients had successful portal flow in Doppler ultrasound control evaluations.\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 \u0000 The goal was to reestablish physiological flow to the graft. A surgical strategy includes using the LGV graft. According to our reports, using LGV fulfilled the requirements for excellent vascular anastomosis and even allowed the dispensing of venous grafts. This is the largest case series in a single center of reconstruction of portal flow with direct anastomosis with the LGV without needing a vascular graft.\u0000","PeriodicalId":503165,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Surgery Open","volume":"14 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140426022","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A Day in the Life of a Surgical Instrument: The Cycle of Sterilization 手术器械的一天:绝育周期
Pub Date : 2024-02-22 DOI: 10.1097/as9.0000000000000381
Robert E. George, Caroline C. Bay, E. Shaffrey, Peter J. Wirth, Venkat K. Rao
Surgeons must be confident that the instruments they use do not pose risk of infection to patients due to bioburden or contamination. Despite this importance, surgeons are not necessarily aware of the steps required to ensure that an instrument has been properly sterilized, processed, and prepared for the next operation. At the end of an operation, instruments must be transported to the sterile processing unit. There, instruments are decontaminated before being sterilized by heat, chemical, or radiation-based methods. Following this, they are stored before being brought back into use. This review highlights the intricacies of the processing of surgical instruments at the conclusion of an operation so that they are ready for the next one.
外科医生必须确信,他们使用的器械不会因生物负载或污染而对患者造成感染风险。尽管这一点很重要,但外科医生并不一定知道需要采取哪些步骤来确保器械经过适当消毒、处理并为下一次手术做好准备。手术结束后,必须将器械运送到无菌处理装置。在那里,器械在通过加热、化学或辐射方法灭菌之前要先进行去污处理。之后,这些器械被储存起来,然后再重新投入使用。本综述重点介绍了手术结束后如何处理手术器械,以便为下一次手术做好准备。
{"title":"A Day in the Life of a Surgical Instrument: The Cycle of Sterilization","authors":"Robert E. George, Caroline C. Bay, E. Shaffrey, Peter J. Wirth, Venkat K. Rao","doi":"10.1097/as9.0000000000000381","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/as9.0000000000000381","url":null,"abstract":"Surgeons must be confident that the instruments they use do not pose risk of infection to patients due to bioburden or contamination. Despite this importance, surgeons are not necessarily aware of the steps required to ensure that an instrument has been properly sterilized, processed, and prepared for the next operation. At the end of an operation, instruments must be transported to the sterile processing unit. There, instruments are decontaminated before being sterilized by heat, chemical, or radiation-based methods. Following this, they are stored before being brought back into use. This review highlights the intricacies of the processing of surgical instruments at the conclusion of an operation so that they are ready for the next one.","PeriodicalId":503165,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Surgery Open","volume":"24 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140441078","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Trends in Survival for Adult Organ Transplantation 成人器官移植的生存趋势
Pub Date : 2024-02-22 DOI: 10.1097/as9.0000000000000383
Grant Patrick, Brian Hickner, Karthik Goli, Liam D. Ferreira, John A Goss, Abbas Rana
Intent-to-treat analysis follows patients from listing to death, regardless of their transplant status, and aims to provide a more holistic scope of the progress made in adult solid-organ transplantation. Many studies have shown progress in waitlist and post-transplant survival for adult kidney, liver, heart, and lung transplants, but there is a need to provide a more comprehensive perspective of transplant outcomes for patients and their families. Univariable and multivariable Cox regression analyses were used to analyze factors contributing to intent-to-treat survival in 813,862 adults listed for kidney, liver, heart, and lung transplants. The Kaplan–Meier method was used to examine changes in waitlist, post-transplant, and intent-to-treat survival. Transplantation rates were compared using χ2 tests. Intent-to-treat survival has steadily increased for liver, heart, and lung transplants. The percentage of patients transplanted within 1 year significantly increased for heart (57.4% from 52.9%) and lung (73.5% from 33.2%). However, the percentage of patients transplanted within 1 year significantly decreased from 35.8% to 21.2% for kidney transplant. Notably, intent-to-treat survival has decreased for kidneys despite increases in waitlist and post-transplant survival, likely because of the decreased transplant rate. Intent-to-treat survival steadily improved for liver, heart, and lung transplant over the 30-year study period. Continued advancements in allocation policy, immunosuppression, and improved care of patients on the waitlist may contribute to further progress in outcomes of all organs, but the increasing discrepancy in supply and demand of donor kidneys is alarming and has impeded the progress of kidney intent-to-treat survival.
意向治疗分析跟踪患者从列名到死亡的整个过程,无论其移植状态如何,旨在更全面地了解成人实体器官移植所取得的进展。 许多研究表明,成人肾脏、肝脏、心脏和肺移植的候选名单和移植后存活率有所提高,但还需要从更全面的角度为患者及其家属提供移植结果。 我们使用单变量和多变量 Cox 回归分析法对 813,862 名列入肾移植、肝移植、心脏移植和肺移植名单的成人的意向治疗存活率因素进行了分析。采用 Kaplan-Meier 法检查候选名单、移植后和意向治疗存活率的变化。移植率采用χ2检验进行比较。 肝脏、心脏和肺移植的意向治疗存活率稳步上升。心脏(从 52.9% 增加到 57.4%)和肺(从 33.2% 增加到 73.5%)移植患者在 1 年内接受移植的比例显著增加。然而,肾移植患者在 1 年内接受移植的比例则从 35.8% 显著下降到 21.2%。值得注意的是,尽管等待名单和移植后存活率有所提高,但肾脏的意向治疗存活率却有所下降,这可能是因为移植率下降的缘故。 在 30 年的研究期间,肝脏、心脏和肺移植的意向治疗存活率稳步提高。分配政策、免疫抑制的不断进步以及对等待名单上患者护理的改善可能有助于进一步提高所有器官的治疗效果,但供体肾脏供需矛盾的日益加剧令人担忧,也阻碍了肾脏意向治疗存活率的提高。
{"title":"Trends in Survival for Adult Organ Transplantation","authors":"Grant Patrick, Brian Hickner, Karthik Goli, Liam D. Ferreira, John A Goss, Abbas Rana","doi":"10.1097/as9.0000000000000383","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/as9.0000000000000383","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 \u0000 Intent-to-treat analysis follows patients from listing to death, regardless of their transplant status, and aims to provide a more holistic scope of the progress made in adult solid-organ transplantation.\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 \u0000 Many studies have shown progress in waitlist and post-transplant survival for adult kidney, liver, heart, and lung transplants, but there is a need to provide a more comprehensive perspective of transplant outcomes for patients and their families.\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 \u0000 Univariable and multivariable Cox regression analyses were used to analyze factors contributing to intent-to-treat survival in 813,862 adults listed for kidney, liver, heart, and lung transplants. The Kaplan–Meier method was used to examine changes in waitlist, post-transplant, and intent-to-treat survival. Transplantation rates were compared using χ2 tests.\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 \u0000 Intent-to-treat survival has steadily increased for liver, heart, and lung transplants. The percentage of patients transplanted within 1 year significantly increased for heart (57.4% from 52.9%) and lung (73.5% from 33.2%). However, the percentage of patients transplanted within 1 year significantly decreased from 35.8% to 21.2% for kidney transplant. Notably, intent-to-treat survival has decreased for kidneys despite increases in waitlist and post-transplant survival, likely because of the decreased transplant rate.\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 \u0000 Intent-to-treat survival steadily improved for liver, heart, and lung transplant over the 30-year study period. Continued advancements in allocation policy, immunosuppression, and improved care of patients on the waitlist may contribute to further progress in outcomes of all organs, but the increasing discrepancy in supply and demand of donor kidneys is alarming and has impeded the progress of kidney intent-to-treat survival.\u0000","PeriodicalId":503165,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Surgery Open","volume":"15 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140441122","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Stapled End-To-Side Ileocolic Anastomosis in Crohn’s Disease: Old Dog, Reliable Tricks? A Retrospective Two-Center Cohort Study 克罗恩病中的缝合端侧回结肠吻合术:老狗,可靠的技巧?一项双中心队列回顾性研究
Pub Date : 2024-02-19 DOI: 10.1097/as9.0000000000000374
V. Doğru, Jean H. Ashburn, Umut Akova, A. Sutter, E. Esen, E. M. Gardner, A. da Luz Moreira, A. Erkan, John Kirat, M. Grieco, F. Remzi
Analyze our long-term experience with a less-popularized but stalwart approach, the stapled end-to-side ileocolic anastomosis. The choice of technical approach to ileocolic anastomosis after ileocecal resection for Crohn’s disease affects surgical outcomes and recurrence. Yet, despite heterogeneous data from different anastomotic configurations, there remains no clear guidance as to the optimal technique. In a retrospective cohort design, patients undergoing ileocolic anastomosis in the setting of Crohn’s disease between 2016 and 2021 at two institutions were identified. Patient characteristics and surgical outcomes in terms of recurrence (surgical, clinical, and endoscopic) were studied. In total, 211 patients were included. Before surgery, 80% were exposed to at least 1 cycle of systemic steroids and 71% had at least 1 biologic agent; 60% exhibited penetrating disease and 38% developed an intra-abdominal abscess. After surgery, one anastomosis leaked (0.5%). Over 2.4 years of follow-up (IQR = 1.3–3.9), surgical recurrence was 0.9%. Two-year overall recurrence-free and endoscopic recurrence-free survivals were 74% and 85% (95% CI = 68–81 and 80–91), respectively. The adjusted hazard ratio of endoscopic recurrence was 3.0 (95% CI = 1.4–6.2) for males and 5.2 (1.2–22) for patients who received systemic steroids before the surgery. The stapled end-to-side anastomosis is an efficient, reliable, and reproducible approach to maintain bowel continuity after ileocecal resection with durable outcomes. Our outcomes demonstrate low rates of disease recurrence and stand favorably in comparison to other more technically complex or protracted anastomotic approaches. This anastomosis is an ideal reconstructive approach after ileocecal resection for Crohn’s disease.
分析我们对一种不太流行但却非常有效的方法--订书钉端侧回肠结肠吻合术--的长期经验。 克罗恩病回盲切除术后回结肠吻合技术方法的选择会影响手术效果和复发率。然而,尽管来自不同吻合器配置的数据各不相同,但最佳技术仍无明确指南。 在一项回顾性队列设计中,研究人员确定了两家医疗机构在2016年至2021年间接受回结肠吻合术的克罗恩病患者。研究了患者特征和复发方面的手术结果(手术、临床和内镜)。 共纳入 211 名患者。手术前,80%的患者至少接受过一个周期的全身类固醇治疗,71%的患者至少使用过一种生物制剂;60%的患者表现为穿透性疾病,38%的患者出现腹腔内脓肿。术后有一处吻合口渗漏(0.5%)。随访2.4年(IQR = 1.3-3.9),手术复发率为0.9%。两年无复发和无内镜复发的总生存率分别为 74% 和 85% (95% CI = 68-81 和 80-91)。男性患者内镜复发的调整后危险比为3.0(95% CI = 1.4-6.2),术前接受全身类固醇治疗的患者内镜复发的调整后危险比为5.2(1.2-22)。 订书钉端侧吻合术是回盲肠切除术后保持肠道连续性的一种高效、可靠、可重复的方法,效果持久。我们的结果显示疾病复发率很低,与其他技术更复杂或时间更长的吻合方法相比更胜一筹。这种吻合术是克罗恩病回盲切除术后的理想重建方法。
{"title":"Stapled End-To-Side Ileocolic Anastomosis in Crohn’s Disease: Old Dog, Reliable Tricks? A Retrospective Two-Center Cohort Study","authors":"V. Doğru, Jean H. Ashburn, Umut Akova, A. Sutter, E. Esen, E. M. Gardner, A. da Luz Moreira, A. Erkan, John Kirat, M. Grieco, F. Remzi","doi":"10.1097/as9.0000000000000374","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/as9.0000000000000374","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 \u0000 Analyze our long-term experience with a less-popularized but stalwart approach, the stapled end-to-side ileocolic anastomosis.\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 \u0000 The choice of technical approach to ileocolic anastomosis after ileocecal resection for Crohn’s disease affects surgical outcomes and recurrence. Yet, despite heterogeneous data from different anastomotic configurations, there remains no clear guidance as to the optimal technique.\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 \u0000 In a retrospective cohort design, patients undergoing ileocolic anastomosis in the setting of Crohn’s disease between 2016 and 2021 at two institutions were identified. Patient characteristics and surgical outcomes in terms of recurrence (surgical, clinical, and endoscopic) were studied.\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 \u0000 In total, 211 patients were included. Before surgery, 80% were exposed to at least 1 cycle of systemic steroids and 71% had at least 1 biologic agent; 60% exhibited penetrating disease and 38% developed an intra-abdominal abscess. After surgery, one anastomosis leaked (0.5%). Over 2.4 years of follow-up (IQR = 1.3–3.9), surgical recurrence was 0.9%. Two-year overall recurrence-free and endoscopic recurrence-free survivals were 74% and 85% (95% CI = 68–81 and 80–91), respectively. The adjusted hazard ratio of endoscopic recurrence was 3.0 (95% CI = 1.4–6.2) for males and 5.2 (1.2–22) for patients who received systemic steroids before the surgery.\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 \u0000 The stapled end-to-side anastomosis is an efficient, reliable, and reproducible approach to maintain bowel continuity after ileocecal resection with durable outcomes. Our outcomes demonstrate low rates of disease recurrence and stand favorably in comparison to other more technically complex or protracted anastomotic approaches. This anastomosis is an ideal reconstructive approach after ileocecal resection for Crohn’s disease.\u0000","PeriodicalId":503165,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Surgery Open","volume":"3 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139958763","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Comment on Article “Risk Models for Developing Pancreatic Fistula After Pancreatoduodenectomy: Validation in a Nationwide Prospective Cohort” 评论文章 "胰十二指肠切除术后患胰瘘的风险模型:在全国性前瞻性队列中进行验证"
Pub Date : 2024-02-19 DOI: 10.1097/as9.0000000000000392
Yanfei Yang, Ziqiang Du, Rui Du
{"title":"Comment on Article “Risk Models for Developing Pancreatic Fistula After Pancreatoduodenectomy: Validation in a Nationwide Prospective Cohort”","authors":"Yanfei Yang, Ziqiang Du, Rui Du","doi":"10.1097/as9.0000000000000392","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/as9.0000000000000392","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":503165,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Surgery Open","volume":"23 13","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140450643","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Annals of Surgery Open
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1