Eye & Contact Lens-Science and Clinical Practice最新文献

Purpose: The aim of this study was to determine the association between family history and corneal characteristics of keratoconus in Japan.

Methods: The clinical records of patients with keratoconus who were interviewed regarding family history of keratoconus were retrospectively reviewed. Corneal indices derived from anterior segment optical coherence tomography were compared between the positive and negative family history groups using multiple linear regression analysis adjusted with age, sex, and history of atopy and eye rubbing.

Results: A total of 2,701 eyes, including 122 eyes with positive family history, were enrolled. Based on the adjusted multiple linear regression analysis, no significant differences were found between groups with and without a family history except for paracentral and mid-peripheral corneal thickness. The adjusted mean differences in paracentral and mid-peripheral corneal thicknesses between the two groups were -10.33 (95% confidence interval -20.29 to -0.37 P -value <0.05) and -9.78 (95% confidence interval -16.70 to -2.85, P -value <0.01), respectively.

Conclusions: There was no significant association between family history and corneal indices in Japanese patients with keratoconus, except for paracentral and mid-peripheral corneal thicknesses. A Japanese patient with keratoconus who had a family history showed significantly lower paracentral and mid-peripheral corneal thicknesses than those with no family history.

Abstract: We present an alternative surgical procedure including simultaneous deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK) and Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) in a case with endothelial failure and stromal scarring. A 62-year-old woman presented with vision loss caused by pseudophakic bullous keratopathy. While waiting for a corneal transplant, the patient developed infectious keratitis, which was treated with medication. Although the keratitis healed, it left a scar. To improve the patient's vision, a corneal transplant surgery that included simultaneous DALK and DMEK was performed. Postoperatively, the corneal graft was clear, and the Descemet membrane was well attached. However, there was an interface haze because of residual stromal tissue. The patient's best-corrected visual acuity improved from hand motion to 0.2 (decimal). This combined procedure allows for lamellar keratoplasty in cases with coexistence of corneal endothelial and stromal involvement.

Purpose: The Zoster Eye Disease Study (ZEDS) is a multicenter randomized clinical trial (RCT) funded by the National Eye Institute aiming to determine the efficacy of suppressive valacyclovir treatment in herpes zoster ophthalmicus (HZO) that enrolled fewer participants than planned (527/780, 67.6%). Understanding reasons for nonparticipation of likely eligible prescreened patients provides insights into patient populations that are not represented by ZEDS and barriers in clinical trials.

Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, HZO adults likely eligible for ZEDS with a history of a typical rash and a medical record within the past year of an episode of epithelial or stromal keratitis or iritis were prescreened at activated Participating Clinical Centers from 2017 to 2022 using a standard prescreening log. De-identified data including demographic information, reasons for exclusion because of ineligibility, and patient refusal were retrospectively entered into REDCap and analyzed.

Results: Prescreening logs with reasons for nonconsent (1244/1706, 72.9%) were included in the data set. Patients were excluded from the study (915/1244, 73.6%) because they did not meet all inclusion criteria (619/915, 67.7%) or met an exclusion criterion (296/915, 32.3%). Among the 12 exclusion criteria for the ZEDS study, immunocompromise (76/296, 25.7%) and renal insufficiency (50/296, 16.9%) were most frequently reported. Patient refusal to participate (327/1,244, 26.3%) was common.

Conclusion: The most common reasons for ineligibility were immunocompromise and renal insufficiency. There may be benefits to long-term antiviral use in these populations not captured in ZEDS. A quarter (26.3%) of prescreened patients refused participation, showing the substantial impact of patient preferences on trial participation.

Purpose: To investigate and compare the morphological features and differences among Gaussian, Sagittal, and Tangential anterior corneal curvature maps obtained with an anterior segment optical coherence tomographer combined with a Placido disc MS-39 device in keratoconus (KC) and normal eyes.

Methods: Prospective, cross-sectional study including 37 KC and 51 healthy eyes. The pattern of astigmatism and maximum keratometry (Kmax), keratometry at the thinnest point (Ktp) and 2 mm diameter (K 2mm ), and inferior-superior dioptric asymmetry values were obtained and calculated from Gaussian, Tangential, and Sagittal curvature maps using the MS-39 (CSO).

Results: In KC eyes, an asymmetric bowtie pattern was observed in 64.86% (24/37), 64.86% (24/37), and 0% in the Sagittal, Tangential, and Gaussian maps, respectively. In normal eyes, 51.0% (26/51), 51.0% (26/51), and 0% showed a symmetric bowtie pattern in the Sagittal, Tangential, and Gaussian maps, respectively. There was a significant difference for the variables Kmax, Ktp, and K 2mm inferior among the Gaussian, Tangential, and Sagittal maps in both normal and KC groups. Sensitivity discriminating between normal and KC eyes was 100%, 97.3%, and 90.9% and specificity was 94.1%, 100%, and 100% for Kmax coming from the Tangential, Gaussian, and Sagittal maps, respectively.

Conclusions: Gaussian maps displayed significantly different morphological features when compared with Sagittal and Tangential maps in normal and KC eyes. Anterior curvature maps from Gaussian maps do not show the morphological pattern of symmetric bowtie in normal eyes nor asymmetric bowtie in KC eyes. Kmax from Gaussian maps are more specific, however less sensitive than Tangential maps in discriminating KC from normal eyes.

Objective: Scleral lenses (SLs) can be customized using traditional diagnostic lens fitting or by using image- and/or impression-based technologies. This study describes the availability and usage of SL fitting technology in patients with keratoconus.

Methods: An online survey queried practitioners on the mode of practice, country of residence, and estimated number of SL fits completed for keratoconus. Practitioners were asked whether they had access to image- and/or impression-based technology and to estimate the percentage of fits completed using diagnostic fitting, image-based technology, and impression-based technology. Access and usage of technology was compared between academic and community practices, United States and non-United States, and high-volume (≥60 SLs) and low-volume fitters.

Results: 423 practitioners who fit SL for keratoconus participated. Image- and impression-based technologies were more frequently available in academic practices compared with community practices and high-volume compared with low-volume practitioners ( P <0.005). Practitioners with image-based technology used it for a median [interquartile range] 5 [25]% of SL fittings; those with impression-based technology used it for 8 [9]% of fittings, and those with both types of technology used image-based devices for 12 [23]% of fittings and impression-based for 5 [8]% of fittings.

Conclusions: In this study, most participants report using diagnostic lenses to fit SLs for patients with keratoconus.

Abstract: Radial keratotomy (RK) was commonly performed in the 1980s and 1990s. We aimed to clarify the current status of post-RK refractive correction and treatment. We retrospectively reviewed the charts of 70 patients with a history of RK. Of the 70 patients, 44 were identified for clinical outcomes. Refractive or therapeutic intervention (rigid gas-permeable contact lens fit, spectacle prescription, corneal surgery, and use of pilocarpine hydrochloride for photophobia) was possible in 59% of patients with postoperative visual deterioration after RK; in the remaining 41%, therapeutic intervention was not possible. Rigid gas-permeable contact lens fit for corneal irregular astigmatism was the most common refractive intervention and was effective in 36% of cases in the university hospital.

Objective: To evaluate the prevalence of dry eye disease (DED) in laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) candidates.

Methods: A chart review of consecutive LASIK candidates who underwent full ocular surface work-up was performed, including ocular surface disease index (OSDI), noninvasive tests (noninvasive tear breakup time [ni-TBUT], tear meniscus height, lipid layer thickness, and meibography), and invasive tests (Schirmer test I, fluorescein TBUT, corneal staining, and meibomian gland [MG] expressibility). The prevalence of DED was calculated according to the Dry Eye Workshop II (DEWS II), and Japanese and Asia Dry Eye Society (JDES/ADES) criteria.

Results: In total, 135 patients (270 eyes) were evaluated. The mean age was 32.6±8.3 years, and 62.9% were women (n=85); 19 patients (15.4%) wore contact lenses, and 31 patients (23.8%) used artificial tears. The mean OSDI was 18.2±16.9, which was abnormal in 54.1% (n=62). Inferior lid MG dropout was the sign with the highest percentage of abnormal results (61.5%; n=83). There were no differences between men and women in any test except for ni-TBUT (6.3±0.3 and 7.2±0.2, respectively; P=0.002). Dry eye disease prevalence was 25.9% and 53.3%, according to JDES/ADES and DEWS II criteria, respectively. The only significant risk factor for DED was artificial tear use for both DEWS II (odds ratio [OR]=3.5, confidence interval [CI] [1.35-9.39]) and JDES/ADES (OR=2.58, CI [1.03-6.48]).

Conclusions: This study found a high prevalence of DED and abnormalities in LASIK candidates and highlights the importance of ocular surface evaluation before photorefractive surgery.

Abstract: Corneal abrasions are among the most common ophthalmic injuries in the emergency department (ED) and primarily present as severe ocular pain. Topical anesthetics provide temporary analgesia, but overuse is associated with complications including further corneal injury, infection, and vision loss. This case series describes three patients who used a 15-mL bottle of 0.05% proparacaine hydrochloride ophthalmic solution after discharge from the ED and returned within three days with corneal injury and pain. Although the use of topical anesthetics is traditionally discouraged by ophthalmologists, publications in the emergency medicine literature support their use. We review the literature surrounding topical anesthetic use in the ED setting and caution against prescribing patients topical anesthetics for corneal abrasions, particularly without patient counseling and significant restriction of anesthetic supply.